When illustrious leaders of the opposition cannot define what a woman is, you got to ask yourself, what the hell is going on?
Why is all this overrated, X-rated smut being peddled from every outlier?
Have we really flooded school libraries with homoerotic books meant for 6-year-old school kids?
Whose idea was it to enshrine drag queen-story hour as a rite of passage?
And since when was it acceptable for creeps with schoolgirl fetishes to have unsupervised, intimate conversations with our kids?
In any other time, it would be named indecent exposure or worse grooming. But not today. Self-indulgent narcissism is the gold standard of self-expression. The conversations people ought to be having with their therapist have become prime time debating points. It’s another day another carnivalesque parade of blokes in frocks swanning around social media, the creepier and more degenerate the content, the more of an inalienable right it is to rub your nose in it. For as long as their entitlements are upheld, all others are scattered to the wind. It’s no longer women and children first but every licentious adult male with a fetish in need of validation.
Typically, it’s a mind-numbing sideshow that would go entirely unnoticed if it wasn’t for the algorithms. Even amongst men lacking distinction, to paraphrase Catch 22, the likes of Dylan Mulvaney would inevitably stand out as men lacking even more distinction than all the rest.
But not so fast. Progressivism has managed to polish the turd, so much so that the most nauseating and cringeworthy are regaled into positions of mega-stardom, celebrated not for their virtue, but complete lack of credibility.
I’m all in favour of freedom of expression, men being in touch with their feminine side, it’s when schoolchildren are mandated to provide what constitutes a free psychotherapy session that I have a problem; and It’s when the most immoral are given the halo effect by conventional wisdom that alarms bells start ringing.
Not so long ago, the deranged ramblings of a person’s alter ego would be subject to strict patient doctor confidentially, but today they are celebrated as virtuous hallmarks of the post-modern citizen, by a society that loves to suffer more than the occasional fool.
Founded on the principles of diversity is our strength, your garden variety trans identifier is just another member of another club. Rather than being a unique personification of themselves, it’s one unattractive, overweight, offcut adrift in a sea of other unattractive, overweight, offcuts.
It’s not so much about defending individual expression but creating a mutual admiration society.
And what’s really under attack here is not, woe betide, people’s feelings, delusions of identity or, indeed, right to immoral debauchery, but the fundamentals of our humanity.
The rainbow flag hangs from every public institution, the NHS is erasing the word ‘women’, schools teach 11-year-olds – manythat have just started menstruating – that if they feel uncomfortable in their bodies they’re probably transgender, according to Wikipedia there are 107 gender identities and counting, and ask Google if a man can get pregnant and the answer is unequivocally “yes”.
If the lessons from history are anything to go by, systems of authoritarianism usually begin with people’s attempts to strong-arm the population into the kind of collectivist wrong-think rife throughout trans-ideology; and typically accompany people’s attempts to hijack science and values, language, and culture.
The rainbow is one such requisition, another is mermaids, pride comes from the family unit of lions, begging the question – was this always about children and family disruption, rather than self-expression and inclusion?
Amongst a consortium of vested interests is big pharma The sex reassignment surgery market valued at $623 million in 2022 is projected to reach a jaw-dropping $1.9 billion by 2032, with the cost of each surgical transition ranging from $125,000-$140,000.
Not to mention hormone replacement drugs and lifetime of prescription antidepressants for the unresolved mental health crisis which bodily mutilation is going to exacerbate, and you have a lot of money for political lobbying, influencers, and eventually social change.
In breach of their Hippocratic Oath surgeons have gone from amputating diseased tissues to healthy organs. It’s comparable to the illegal practice of genital mutilation frowned upon by the same moral crusaders defending trans-kids rights to violate their own sex organs. It’s the same energy underpinned by an acceptable rather than unacceptable moral imperative.
In the US, prescription of hormone therapies drugs has more than doubled amongst 6-17 year olds, while in the UK the effect of the pandemic saw the number of youngsters seeking help for mental health problems jump from 12% of children in 2017 to 17.8% in 2022.
It’s all fun and games until it’s not. One of the most conclusive studies from Sweden found that the suicide rate of those who had undergone sex-reassignment surgery rose to 20 times that of comparable peers.
Marketing Gender Dysphoria
The fact that 1.8% of kids and 0.6% of adults identify as the opposite sex, means that two-thirds of children who identify as transgender will eventually overcome gender dysphoria as adults.
But not if those pushing gender ideology have anything to do with it. In recent years marketing directly to children has skyrocketed as advertisers spend more than $12 billion each year targeting kids, and with a majority now having televisions in their bedrooms, it is estimated that children are viewing more than 40,000 commercials each year.
But the biggest explosion in advertising to the youth market comes from unsupervised internet time and advancement in the ways unscrupulous marketers target minors through influencers.
If pronouns are the gateway drug, influencers are the street-dealers. Even amongst adults, Influencers have huge persuasive power with 61% of adult consumers trusting their recommendations. Kids, on the other hand, don’t understand persuasive intent as adults do, since cognitive structures have not yet been formed.
Now imagine how a child’s myopia relates to influencers like Dylan Mulvaney or scar worshipping content on TikTok and Snapchat.
Or that one in five high schoolers identify as non-heterosexual?
Arguably it all goes back to Edward Bernays. the nephew of Sigmund Freud who helped shift the U.S from a nation of citizens into a nation of consumers.
Considered the founding father of propaganda, Bernays adapted Freud’s theory that people were motivated by hidden desires to convince Americans that they should buy consumer goods not because of their necessity, but because they expressed a hidden sense of their inner selves.
He persuaded corporations that if they created a surplus of desires within a society, those desires would not only be satisfied by consumables, but if those consumables were be linked to people’s feelings, Irrelevant objects would become powerful emotional symbols of worship.
Bernays’ theories helped powerful interests divorce the masses from public policy and transform consumerism into the central motor of American life.
On behalf of big tobacco interests Bernays convinced women in America to smoke – at a time when it was socially unacceptable for them to do so – on the back of psychologist, AA Brill’s theory that cigarettes were phallic symbols of male sexual power that would ‘give women their own penises.’
To test the theory Bernays Hijacked New York’s Easter Day parade with a group of rich debutants masquerading as suffragettes ready for Bernays signal to light up. And with the press at hand to capture the moment, the infamous campaign Torches of Freedom was unleashed across every front page.
Bernays had essentially created the idea that if a woman smoked, she would be more powerful, freer, and independent, and if others related to this ideal, they should light their torches of freedom in solidarity.
The same subliminal messaging pervades trans ideology. If you feel that you don’t fit into a profoundly polarised society then the fault lies with your own biology and not the prevailing zeitgeist. Social engineers create the conditions for existential disconnect and offer gender reassignment as the solution.
A similar movement was underway at the turn of the last century when eugenics policies set about eliminating undesirables from the gene pool by forcibly sterilising more than 70,000 feebleminded, disabled, homosexuals and ethnic minorities.
Underpinning the theory of eugenics were elitist, racist and sexist assumptions by government policy makers, prominent industrialists and largely left leaning psychologists, sexologists, educators, and social reformers, including British abortion pioneer Marie Stopes and Margaret Sanger, founder of The American Birth Control League, that would become Planned Parenthood,
In 1969 Planned Parenthood addressed a letter to the Rockefeller Foundations Population Council, known as the Jaffe Memo, proposing several mendacious policies for curbing population growth. These included child tax, compulsory abortions, compulsory sterilisations and, importantly, the encouragement of increased homosexuality.
Some argue that the trans-gendering of children is eugenics by another name. Homosexuals, sterilised under court order a century ago, are doing so of their own volition today. Teenagers weaned on hormone blockers for 12 months who transition to cross-sex hormones risk permanent sterilisation, or as the NHS puts it permanent infertility.
Studies suggest those on the autism spectrum are far more likely to identify as LGBTQ with research from Cambridge University suggesting that autistic adults and adolescents are approximately eight times more likely to identify as asexual and ‘other’ sexuality than their non-autistic peers. Which begs the question – is gender dysphoria misdiagnosis of neurodivergence, namely autism?
At the turn of the century those on the autism spectrum would have been diagnosed as feebleminded under penalty of sterilisation.
What eugenics and gender dysphoria also have in common, according to lesbian, feminist scholar, Sheila Jeffreys, is that…
“both practices are based upon the idea that certain problematic behaviours have a biological basis and can be “cured” by treatments which alter and affect sexual characteristics.”
Jeffreys argues that both are programs of institutionalised social engineering by largely left leaning socialist, academics, psychologists, and sexologists.
Heir to Bernays’ legacy are the predictive programming and subliminal messaging driving today’s public onion, where its sentiment over facts, feelings over morality, and state sponsored populism over traditional social causes.
The result is a generation weaned on corporate and political agenda masquerading as social ideals, and a society that has become an inversion of itself.
Despite the progressive appearances, gender ideology seeks to destroy the nuanced qualities of existential identity acquired over a lifetime of hands-on applied experience.
Under the LGBTQ rubric, it’s no longer about who you are, what you’re made from, the contents of your character, it’s about everything you imagine yourself to be, but are not. The lives you don’t live rather than the one they do. How you aimlessly feel from one idle day to the next, blowing in the wind like last year’s autumn leaves.
It is the manufacturing of a fantasy of what a woman should be, pronouncing her to be so unexceptional as to be instantly replicable. It’s a reductionist ideology that debases sociosexual characteristics into a handful of tropes, loads them into the back end of a social media vending machine which, like every other frontier of our post-consumer society, spits out entirely disposable things of no value. The peak throwaway culture spawned from Bernays propaganda now stretches beyond objects and things to people and their identities.
The same social engineering that divorced the masses from public policy using consumerism in the 1920’s, are dissociating minors from their bodies, some would argue, as a prelude to transhumanism.
You will own nothing, particularly your own identity, and with a host of neurological disorders, you will be happy on antidepressants.
If you enjoy synthetically modified RNA vaccines and gender reassignment surgery, you will love the Internet of Bodies.
Arguably, the intended consequences of gender ideology is to transform those on the Autism spectrum into prototypes for the future of humanity – a submissive, easily deceived generation without scruples, permanently at odds with their identity, meddling with their biology and primed for whatever socially engineered future their puppet masters have in store for them.
Dustin Broadbery is a writer and researcher from London trying to make sense of the New Normal these past three years. Particularly the ethical and legal issues around lockdowns and mandates, the history and roadmap to today’s biosecurity state, and the key players and institutions involved in the globalised takeover of our commons. You can find his work at www.thecogent.org, or follow him on twitter @TheCogent1
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.