IC911’s inaugural ‘David Ray Griffin Annual Lecture’ with Dr Daniele Ganser

Part 2. – But there were doubts about what the native populations wanted; was it mandates, autonomies, independences, were they for or against Zionism, or were indifferent to it? To find that out an American commission was set up, to the grudge of the delegates of the Allied and, in July 1919, travelled to the Near-East to make inquiries. It’s called the King-Crane Commission and you may have never heard of it or of its report as it is a suppressed Official document of the United States Government; but you can find it at the HathiTrust website. “Their report, when eventually received, was a highly inconvenient document. But by that date President Wilson had left Paris for his final collapse. And the King-Crane Commission report was buried under the dust of subsequent diplomacy.” (Peacemaking 1919). Indeed, Britain and especially France followed instead their thirst for revenge and imperialist drives in denial of their solemn prior engagements. These are some of the Commission’s conclusions relevant to the savagery you mention:
 
Regarding Zionist Program: For complete Zionist Program – Jewish State and Immigration: 0.59%; for Modified Zionist Program: 0.4%; against Zionist Program: 72.3% (of a total of 1860 petitions).
 
In Palestine: Moslem population are about four fifths of the population; Christians, less than ten percent, and “[t]he Jews, who constitute a little more than ten percent of the population were all for Zionism. The Moslem and Christian population was practically unanimous against Zionism, usually expressing themselves with great emphasis.”
 
In the territories under Arab Occupation: At the Syrian Congress at Damascus, one of the points agreed upon was the “fundamental principles laid down by President Wilson in condemnation of secret treaties [which] impel us to protest most emphatically against any treaty that stipulates the partition of our Syrian country and against any private engagement aiming at the establishment of Zionism in the southern part of Syria [Palestine]; therefore we ask the complete annulment of these conventions and agreements.”
 
Under the heading Zionism: The report, after having confessed the personal sympathy of the commissioners to the cause of Zionism, made among other things the following observations:

“ ‘A National home for the Jewish people’ [as worded in the Balfour Declaration] is not equivalent to making Palestine into a Jewish State; nor can the erection of such a Jewish State be accomplished without the gravest trespass upon the ‘civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine’. The fact came out repeatedly in the Commission’s conference with Jewish representatives, that the Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase.”
 
“If that principle [Wilson’s idea that the wishes of the populations would be the decisive factor in any settlement rather than agreements between powers, and which was agreed upon] is to rule, and the wishes of Palestine’s population are to be decisive as to what is to be done with Palestine, then it is to be remembered that the non-Jewish population of Palestine – nearly nine tenths of the whole – are emphatically against the entire Zionist program. The tables show that there is no one thing upon which the population of Palestine were more agreed than upon this. To subject a people so minded to unlimited Jewish immigration , and to steady financial and social pressure to surrender the land, would be a gross violation of the principle just quoted, and of the people’s rights, though it kept within the forms of law.”
 
Look up the report, it has a wealth of information collected at the time about the sentiment of the populations of the Middle East on various matters.
 
So, you understand where savagery comes from? I’d go further: if it wasn’t for the resistance of the Palestinians who refused to leave their land in spite of coercion and violence to do so, and hence had to both face and – how could they help themselves? – commit acts of savagery, there would be no Palestinians, today, to talk about; they would have been absorbed by the nations of the world; and the Zionists would have succeeded in annihilating a whole nation with heavy historical content to affirm a non-existent one. That said, I can understand the Zionist standpoint when they assert that there is a vast land in other Arab or Moslem nations for the Palestinians to go to; but this idea is not as simple as it appears at first glance: to drive a whole nation out of its historical land for another to take its place is not a decision made lightly, and that’s why, although mentioned, the proposal was not elaborated as a serious or feasible one. Why indeed should the salvation of the sacrificed Jewish communities be bought with another sacrifice? Just think what it means for an individual to move from a place to another, even within the same country, just because someone wishes to occupy their place.
 
The truth is that the Christian States got tired of feeling guilty and took advantage of the war to illegally give their Jewish communities a land already occupied, thus creating another problem. And it is a supreme irony that those who protected and tolerated the Jewish communities while under Islamic banners (for original populations of Middle East are cousins regardless of faith) have today to be the goat to be butchered by the Israeli State itself under the watch of the West. Don’t forget that when the Moslems were defeated in Spain and crossed Gibraltar, the Jewish community followed them hurriedly lest they were left behind to the persecution and greed of the Christian State. I don’t think I have to remind you the pogroms the Jewish populations were victims of and how they made scapegoats of in any crisis. There was a problem there to be examined, but it was easier to just kick the can down the road over to Palestine.
 
So, the Zionist project was carried out not by right but by might in denial of the obvious objection of the native populations of the whole Middle East and in infringement of the previously agreed upon President Wilson’s principles upon which the Peace Conference was founded. Hence, the State of Israel was and still is an unwelcome, illegitimate State born in violence. Can it reasonably expect lasting peace?

What an utter, utter nonsense:

Quote from the book you have read:
“Not because of its severity, nor because of its lack of wisdom, but because it violated the terms of the Armistice of 11th November, 1918. It is important to remember this, for it was this dishonourable action which enabled Hitler to marshal the whole of Germany behind him and to justify in the eyes of the German people each infringement of the treaty he made.”
No. Hitler never marshaled the whole of Germany behind him; he intimidated, persecuted, tortured, murdered those who did not stand behind him.There was a considerable part of the population that despised Hitler, even long before he came to power. There were many who supported and admired Hitler, but there were also many who did not; some of them resisted openly, some in small and hidden ways, some did not resist at all, but still did not “stand behind” Hitler, and his actions were not “justified in their eyes”.
And the mature reader would throw a history book of an author who makes such a silly, outrageous, and clearly false claim into the dustbin right away.

Thomas Aquinas:
Beware of the man who has read one book.

Both International Communism and Fascism were created by the Monolithic Conspiracy – and they were used as a pincer operation to crush genuine, people-led, political organisation. Operation Gladio was a continuation of that policy, but one of the clearest demonstrations was in the Spanish Civil War. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_Days
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Orwell-Spain-Penguin-Classics-George/dp/0241418011

Christopher Hitchens, in the introduction to that book, writes that Orwell didn’t have the benefit of the Soviet archive – which was released following the collapse of the Union. However, Hitchens didn’t know (or could plead ignorance) that Mussolini had been an asset of British Intelligence (see below). Moreover, the Bolsheviks had been funded by western bankers and Stalin had been supplied with large volumes of US resources – including armaments. I don’t know if Hitchens ever acknowledged that the “Cold War” was a pseudo creation of the Monolithic Conspiracy, let alone the First and Second World Wars, but JFK would certainly have known! See: “From Major Jordan’s Diaries.”
—

Mussolini Was an Asset of British Intelligence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Hoare,_1st_Viscount_Templewood
Aged 34 at the time, Hoare joined the Army soon after the outbreak of the First World War. He was commissioned into the Norfolk Yeomanry as a temporary lieutenant on 17 October 1914.[17] To his disappointment, he was initially only a recruiting officer[12] and illness prevented him from serving at the front. He was promoted to temporary captain on 24 April 1915.[18]

While acting as a recruiting officer, he learnt Russian. In 1916, he was recruited by Mansfield Cumming to be the future MI6’s liaison officer with the Russian Intelligence service in Petrograd (now Saint Petersburg). He soon became head of the British Intelligence Mission to the Russian General Staff with the temporary rank of lieutenant-colonel.[12][19] In that post, he reported to the British government the death of Rasputin and apologised, because of the sensational nature of the event, for having written it in the style of the Daily Mail.[20]

In March 1917 he was posted to Rome, where he remained until the end of the war. His duties included helping to dissuade Italy from dropping out of the war.[12] In Italy, he met and recruited the former socialist leader Benito Mussolini on behalf of the British overseas intelligence service, which was then known as MI1(c). Britain’s intelligence service helped Mussolini to finance his first forays into Italian politics as a pro-war spokesman, giving the 34-year-old newspaper editor £100 a week to keep his propaganda flowing.[21]

For his services in the war, Hoare was twice mentioned in despatches, appointed Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George (CMG) in 1917, and awarded the Orders of St Anne and St Stanislas of Russia, and of St Maurice and St Lazarus of Italy.[8]
—

From Major Jordan’s Diaries

federalexpression
May 29, 2011
Speech from the 1960s. Major George Racey Jordan was responsible for fascilitating the transfer of American Arms and Technology to the USSR during WWII under the Lend Lease Program. He kept a detailed diary including Primary Source documentation.
https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/from-major-jordans-diaries