WATCH: JFK – From Mongoose to Gladio
We all know what happened on 11/22/63. But what about what happened on 11/22/90? And what connects these two events? And what does Seven Days in May have to do with it?
Join James Corbett for a special presentation to the JFK Lancer conference on “JFK: From Mongoose to Gladio.”
A full transcript, along with source links and download options is available HERE. For more Corbett Report content, click HERE.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Here come the CIA myth-programmed wackops to make us all look like fools! Universe have mercy!
What if Khruschev had died instead of Kennedy?
Prof. Kissinger gave a brilliant seminar on the theme. A student asked, “Professor, you admit your talk is pure speculation. Can you state anything for sure?
“Sure. Onassis would not have married Mrs.Khruschev”.
Often forgotten today: Castro was planted as a trigger for war BY THE US– by US intelligence & political establishment. Certain US media went to great lengths to sell Castro to the public.
Failing war, Castro then served several other Deep State purposes.
Yes, the idea that the CIA wanted to get rid of Castro was 100% wrong. Guantanamo Bay is also one of the biggest anomalies in history
Please offer any links proving this statement. I’ve heard some looney stuff here, but this is the topper. The FACTS are Castro contacted the US just as the revolution was concluding, asking for help transitioning to democratic socialism. [The objective of “revolution” is freedom. The objective of WAR is empire.].The answer to that came fast, furious and non-stop from US empire, nearly starving the country to death. I guess they just wanted to be frozen in ’53 Plymouths for the next 100 years? I lived through the period you state “Certain US media went to great lengths to sell Castro to the public.” Please tell us which “media” that did so. You can’t because this idea is made-up history.
Castro, Cuba, Guevara, were the Pinko, Red, Commie whipping boys of the WAR machine along with the McCarthy Trials and the completely ludicrous and incoherent destruction of lives of anyone exploring socialism as an alternative to exploitative capitalist WAR empire exemplified by a then purposeless Korean War. If the idea stated, making SOCIALISM the great whipping boy (while calling it “communism”) I’d say you were right. Socialism is the great bogeyman of capitalist empire and Cuba presented that threat 90 miles from ze “homeland” shores. A whole nation of people under CIA scripted and created “communist” totalitarianism? I think this theory to be more likely a CIA confusionist spin to vaporize the idea of socialism. Social Security, Medicare, USPS (before public-private-partnership sabotage) (and it had a Public Banking component back then), Public Utility Districts, Fire, Water, Roads, Public Hospitals, Street Cleaning, Schools (which capitalists have spent 43 years sabotaging into dumbing down 9am to 3pm prisons for children) and much more, are SOCIALISM. 1% capitalism’s objective is world 99% rentier serfdom. It demands Humanity pay them RENT for EVERYTHING monthly. And they are on the verge of doing just that with an AI, 5G, IoT, Digital Cash surveillance Panopticon, while people fumble and bumble wacko CIA “everything is staged” style history-myths.
CIA put Castro in power.
Earl T Smith (American ambassador to Cuba)
If we are to intervene sufficiently to bring about the overthrow of dictatorships, then we should intervene to whatever extent is required to fulfil our purpose. Otherwise, in my opinion, we must wait for the normal self-development of a people and not assist revolution. And we must be prepared to receive the criticism of supporting friendly governments recognized by the United States, although they have been labeled dictatorships. To make my point more clear, let me say that, we helped to overthrow the Batista dictatorship which was pro-American only to install the Castro dictatorship which is pro-Russian.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_T._Smith
I am going to get a copy of the book: The Fourth Floor : An Account of the Castro Communist Revolution and read it to confirm what you’re suggesting. But my bet is this quote is out context, inadequately describing the content of his book. My bet is the CIA botched some bullshit they were running, like they missestimated the movement’s veracity and bumbled whatever scheme they attempting. But the Bay of Pigs reflected the original intent. Snuff out all socialism, which is what Castro was about.
Radio Liberty
Former U.S. Ambassador to Cuba, Earl T. Smith, during Congressional testimony in 1960, declared flatly: “We put Castro in power.”
https://archive.org/details/FourthFloor
The Bay of Pigs was botched because air cover was (deliberately) not supplied. Full details
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion
The CIA sacrifices other people. Not it’s own. Your overly aggressive confidence in CIA competence is putting you into an indefensible corner.
The information above came from L. Fletcher Prouty, mentioned in this video and the special adviser to the film ‘JFK’. He was the character ‘X’ in the film.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Fletcher_Prouty#Controversy
On 15 April 1959, Castro began an 11-day visit to the United States, at the invitation of the American Society of Newspaper Editors. He said during his visit: “I know the world thinks of us, we are Communists, and of course I have said very clear that we are not Communists; very clear.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Revolution
They were socialists.
CIA arms embargo on Cuba.
Fall of Batista, rise of Castro.Fall of Batista, rise of Castro.
Deliberately botched Bay of Pigs.
(CIA asset ?) LHO emigrates to the SU then returns with ease. Joins pro Cuba group.
Cuban missile crisis
Kennedy assassinated
The end result was the most profitable war in history. The Cold War. Trillions of dollars were spent on nuclear weapons alone.
Big win for the military industrial complex
The alt-media constantly tells us JFK was an American Hero who was killed off by the Elite for daring to cross them. I’m pretty skeptical of this claim and suspect it’s a PSYOP. Miles Mathis has the interesting theory the Kennedy deaths were all fake- this theory has greater credence since it seems JFK really was gay which means we really didn’t know JFK at all then.
http://mileswmathis.com/jfkgay.pdf
I recently read Bain’s 2019 BlackJack book which claims the PTB have been observing the countdown of the 26,000 year precession of the Equinoxes for centuries and that events like JFK, 911 and perhaps even COVID were occult rituals to commemorate this countdown. In that context, if JFK really was killed- then perhaps he was a willing sacrificial victim.
Sorry, off topic, but this is an example of the sick, self serving and perverse behaviour of those who rule.
And it’s more than SIXTY years too late:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-25/canberra-prime-minister-saying-sorry-to-thalidomide-survivors/103110008
So we can expect the ‘Covid’ apologies in 2080 or 2090 then?
Jesus Christ! They make it easy to DESPISE them.
Does anybody know what happened 12 of December 1983?
An occult date all insiders among the entire global vaccinated population are looking forward to, that will change the world into something from where we can never get back!
!2 and 12 = 33, and 1983 is precisely 40 years ago. You cant make these things up!
Moses walking around in the desert in 40 years, the 40 Ali Baba thieves. That tells us the End is near and this time it is HUGE.
Imagination is the greatest nation of them all, keep on trucking.
the final judgement is already in
by the late great michael collins piper
everything else is anglo zio wind
No mention of Piper or his work that I can find in any of Corbett’s voluminous work.
“Why not ?” One might ask. Even to ‘debunk’ it ? Nothing.
“Factless nonsense”, some say. A lot of facts, that is for certain: Permindex, Shaw, Garrison’s comments, Lansky, Angleton, The French Connection, LBJ and ME policy reversal, Dimona, Ben Gurion
It’s almost as if people don’t want anyone to talk about it, or something.
Corbett glows from his appearance at the recent 60th anniversary conference, but Guyenot was barred from appearing. Perhaps because Specter’s old friend was organising the conference !
As you say, might as well blow against the wind…
Lots of people talk and write about everything you have mentioned.
Ever read JFK Assassination Forum?
Lots of talk by life long researchers on all of those topics.
Corbett can’t write about everything. And maybe he does not agree with Mathis.
But there are many people, besides Mathis, who DO write about Permindex, Shaw, Garrison (view John Barbours documentary on Garrison. Covers all of these players) Lansky, Angleton, etc.
Naturally, everyone has their own opinion, but it does get talked about in many circles.
Lots of people talk and write about everything you have mentioned.
I disagree, in that relative to the ongoing conversation about JFK taken as a whole, Piper’s theory is pretty much unheard of. I read JFK material for many years before I even came across him or his book, and I have heard the same experience from other readers too. All the big books on the subject and the Stone films do not mention Piper’s theory.
I have not read at the JFK Assassination Forum. It demands I give my personal details to read it, so I declined.
Corbett can’t write about everything.
So, you say lots of people are talking about the Piper theory, but Corbett just hasn’t covered it, even though he has done dozens of episodes and podcasts about JFK, including several debunks. Doesn’t add up, sounds like he is avoiding controversy.
I don’t know who you mean by Mathis.
I agree, there are different opinions about JFK, but my point stands that the opinions of Piper and Guyenot suggesting an Israeli angle are taboo in the JFK research community, and the conspiracy research circles generally. The theories are not taken seriously enough even to attempt debunking (perhaps because they are not easily debunked, perhaps because of the implications).
Sorry, I don’t know why I wrote Mathis instead of Piper.
I still disagree. I read many points about Israel and Dimona and the Mossad connection on JFK Assassination Forum which includes many of the JFK researchers.
Why, in your opinion has it not made it into more of the books and films ?
Why do you think Guyenot (and discussion of that theory) was kept out of the recent Pittsburgh conference ?
Guyenot on Douglass and his very well received and best selling JFK book :
‘I questioned Douglass about his silence over Kennedy’s determination to forestall Israel’s nuclear ambitions. Kennedy’s effort to lead the world towards general nuclear disarmament is the central and most inspiring theme in Douglass’s book. Kennedy’s resolute opposition to Israel’s secret nuclear bomb factory is the most dramatic manifestation of that effort. For what reason, then, did Douglass choose not to mention it? I asked him in an interview for the French website Reopen 9/11, and in a long, personal letter. In the interview, Douglass answered: “I have found no convincing evidence that Israel was involved in the Kennedy assassination. The story I wrote is about the reasons for his death. For Israel to be included in this story, Kennedy’s resistance to Israel’s nuclear weapons program would have to be linked to the plot against his life.” By letter, he responded to my arguments with a personal testimony of how Jewish writer André Schwarz-Bart, author of the novel The Last of the Just, “helped to liberate me from the Christendom that has so murderous a heritage, and to introduce me to a Jewish perspective that I needed to see from within a boxcar approaching Auschwitz.” From there he stated that he does not work on the assumption of Israel’s responsibility in the Kennedy assassination, 9/11, or any other crime.
…
Douglass kept silent on Kennedy’s angst over Dimona even though it would have reinforced his main thesis about Kennedy’s determination to stop and reverse nuclear proliferation. For some reason, Douglass made sure he didn’t give his readers the slightest chance to start imagining that Israel had any part in Kennedy’s problem with “the Unspeakable”.
https://www.unz.com/article/kennedy-assassination-cia-did-it-theorists-are-covering-for-israel/