55

A Letter from India: Stop WHO’s ‘Pandemic Preparedness’ Tyranny

Colin Todhunter

The global pandemic preparedness accord (‘pandemic treaty’) currently being put in place by the World Health Organization (WHO) will pave the way for “a fascist approach to societal management.” The beneficiaries will be unscrupulous corporations and investors whom the COVID‐19 response served well. This will result in the loss of human rights and individual freedom.

So says Dr David Bell, a clinical and public health physician with a PhD in population health and former WHO scientific and medical officer. The treaty represents a terrifying power grab that, if successful, will give the WHO a central directing role and monopoly power in global health governance.

As currently drafted, the treaty will hand the WHO the authority to order measures, including significant financial contributions by individual states, lockdowns, travel restrictions, forced medical examinations and mandatory vaccinations during a public health emergency of its own declaring.

The WHO will have sole and extensive power to declare Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) for any potential or real threat for extended areas, whether these threats are biological, climate or environment related. And it will do so without proper proof and solely decide measures and medical substances to be imposed on the public without informed consent.

Its powers will also include the official censorship of information, including free speech — views opposing the official narrative put out by the WHO ­— and it will be accountable to no national parliament or be limited by any constitutional safeguards.

A group of prominent lawyers, doctors and concerned citizens have written to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Minister of Health and Family Welfare Shri Mansukh L Mandaviya urging them to reject the WHO’s global pandemic treaty. The signatories are listed at the end of this article, and the 10-page letter can be accessed in full with all relevant links and references on the Awaken India website: WHO Pandemic Treaty Ultra Vires of the Constitution.

The WHO released a Zero Draft of the WHO CA+ (this ‘pandemic treaty’ is now officially known as an ‘accord’) with 38 Articles on 1 February 2023 and, subsequently, another draft with 41 Articles on 2 June 2023. The accord marks a fundamental change in how the WHO will function. It seeks secretively, behind closed doors, sweeping powers under its director general.

The signatories make clear that, under the proposed accord, the WHO can, at will, call a pandemic, declare a PHEIC and then take over the authority of national governments to detain citizens, restrict their travel, require them to have vaccine passports (forced testing and vaccination) and increase social media censorship. The accord would also operate as a ‘framework convention’ that’s on-going, year after year, indefinitely. It facilitates a dictatorship role for the WHO as it moves to acquire unfettered power.

Two instruments, the accord itself and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, are designed to operate in parallel to give draconian powers to the WHO. Both texts irremediably entail the transfer to the WHO of the power to threaten health freedom, thereby representing a fundamental threat to national, medical and bodily autonomy.

In their letter, the authors state that the WHO is an external, unelected body, which may not and cannot be appointed to such a dictatorship position. During the COVID-19 event, the WHO’s role in facilitating medical tyranny was clear to see.

It advocated enforced lockdowns, which destroyed the livelihoods of millions in India and across the world and created a surge in mental health problems. It shut down schools, putting back the education of a generation. It promoted incompletely tested and unapproved vaccines under EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation) that despite the claims of ‘safe and effective’ where nothing of the sort and caused a sharp rise in spike protein-induced heart and brain disease.

If adopted at the 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024 by a simple majority vote, the ‘pandemic treaty’ will come into force within 12 months for all countries, unless a country proactively files rejections or reservations within a 10-month period.

The letter to the prime minister and the health minister states that the accord and those pushing it are:

Manifestly violative of Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India and, therefore, Ultra Vires of the Indian Constitution. In their very intent, they cancel the fundamental right to bodily autonomy and integrity, through mandating medical procedures, coercion and further grossly illegal acts.”

The letter adds:

This is a breathtaking and terrifying onslaught on fundamental civil liberties. It must be understood as fundamental, that the negation of bodily integrity of any human being means the loss of all human rights.”

In making its point, the letter refers to the Nuremberg Code (1947) by stating:

The consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights resumed this ban against unintentional experimentation in its 1966 text, which states: no one may be subjected without his consent to medical or scientific experiment.”

It also references the Geneva statement for doctors (1948):

I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patient. I will not use my medical knowledge to infringe human rights and civil liberties, even under force. I will keep absolute respect for human life, from conception. I will consider my patient’s health as my first concern.”

The signatories note that there is little alternative but to jettison the WHO from national life and implore the prime minister and the health minister to act to uphold the sovereignty of India and the rights of every citizen.

They add that unelected, unaccountable and largely unknown delegates from 194 countries meet in Geneva during World Health Assembly meetings, as they did in 2022 when they adopted amendments to the IHR. The process is fraught with secrecy, autocracy and impending tyranny, blatantly devoid of any transparent, democratic process.

These country delegates are unelected and do not represent the people of their country. The signatories ask:

How can they negotiate on behalf of nations, let alone an international/global health regulation binding on 194 countries?”

If the ‘global pandemic treaty’ is forced through, we could see perpetual lockdowns. At the same time, corporate interests will dominate. Pandemics will become self-sustaining by creating a bureaucracy whose existence will depend on them.

People will be at the mercy of the police and bureaucrats who will be immune to any penalty for any acts carried out in ‘good faith’. These acts could take the form of mandatory medical procedures, forced entry into premises, forced isolation and quarantine.

It was bad enough in 2020 with the full force of the state lined up against the public, especially those who did not agree with COVID policies, but imagine the abuse of power that could occur if the WHO acquires the powers it seeks.

The seeds of totalitarianism were clear to see with Anthony Fauci saying that he is ‘the science’, former New Zealand PM Jacinda Arden declaring the government as the ‘single source of truth’ and social media companies working hand in glove with the deep state to censor and deplatform prominent figures and world-renowned scientists who questioned the official narrative. 

We saw the suspension of fundamental civil liberties with the threat of state violence on hand, often resulting in citizens being abused by de facto paramilitary police forces for breaching ‘pandemic rules’ that had no scientific basis.

Governments declared that they were ‘following the science’, but what we saw were inflated death numbers, manipulated data and the fraudulent use of RT-PCR tests to help create the perception of a deadly pandemic in the minds of the public. Readers can consult the online article Stay Home, Save Lives: Uncovering the COVID Deception, which provides insight into the various deceptions that helped instil fear into the global population in 2020.

The WHO also provided a wrong projection of mortality. The exaggeration caused panic in the population ­— part of a carefully orchestrated ‘fear pandemic’ ­ and paved the way for lockdowns and the mass uptake of vaccines sold to the public based on false claims. The synthetic spike protein of the vaccines has resulted in clotting, bleeding, heart problems and brain blood clotting as well as neurodegenerative problems. And what we are seeing across so many countries since the vaccine rollout is significant excess mortality, which the media is silent about. 

Moreover, the WHO operates within a biopharmaceutical complex, a complicated syndicate that has formed over time, which instructs world health policies. This complex involves the health agencies of national governments, including India, the US and the UK, the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation, the Welcome Group and major pharmaceutical companies. Revolving door arrangements between these organisations have resulted in regulatory capture.

Researcher and campaigner Yohan Tengra of the Awaken India Movement conducted a two-year investigation into how this works in India. Through his research, he exposed the billionaire cartel that controlled India’s COVID-19 Task Force. Tengra listed not just the names of those who sat on this task force, but he also detailed how they are financially connected to the pharmaceutical-vaccine industry.

The task force was responsible for the aggressive push to lockdown, mandatory mask requirements, forced testing of asymptomatic people, dropping ivermectin from the national protocol, suppressing vaccine adverse events and much more.

Tengra also exposed how India’s prominent public health personalities, who regularly appeared in the media and on TV, are connected to the Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Welcome Trust, USAID, the World Bank and other aspects of the global deep state.

We have every right to be concerned about a ‘pandemic treaty’ shaped by powerful interests with stakes in closing down economies (see the online article Systemic Collapse and Pandemic Simulation by Fabio Vighi), mandatory vaccination programmes and digital surveillance who are all too willing to strip away our fundamental rights for their own gain.

The letter to India’s prime minister and the minister of health makes clear that the WHO’s massive conflict of interest should disqualify it from any role in world health.

Signatories:

Dr. Jacob Puliyel, Delhi, MD, MRCP, MPhil, Paediatrician and Visiting Faculty International
Prashant Bhushan, New Delhi, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India
Colin Gonsalves, New Delhi, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India
Nilesh Ojha, Mumbai, President – Indian Bar Association, Advocate Bombay High Court and Supreme Court of India, Human Rights Activist
Author Dr. Amitav Banerjee, Pune, MD, Formerly Epidemiologist, Indian Armed Forces
Dr Aseem Malhotra, London (Overseas Citizen of India), MBChB, MRCP. Consultant Cardiologist
Aruna Rodrigues, Mhow, Lead Petitioner: GMO PIL in the Supreme Court and Member Iridescent Blue Fish (IBF)
Dr. Donthi Narasimha Reddy, Hyderabad, Public Policy Expert and Campaigner
Dr. Megha Consul, Gurugram, Paediatrics, Senior Consultant, Neonatologist
Dr. Pravin Chordia, Pune, MD Surgeon
Dr. Lalitkumar Anande, Mumbai, MBBS, PG Diploma in Clinical Research
Dr. Vijay Raghava, Bangalore, MBBS Dr. Veena Raghava, Bangalore, MBBS, DA
Dr. Kuldeep Kumar, Haridwar, MBBS MS (GENERAL SURGERY) Dr. Praveen Saxena, Hyderabad, Radiologist & Clinical metal toxicologist, MBBS, DMRD Osmania
Dr. Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury, Faridabad, Ph.D (Diabetes)
Dr. Gautam Das, Kolkata, MBBS, General Physician
Saraswati Kavula, Hyderabad, Documentary Filmmaker & Freelance Journalist, Awaken India Movement
Bhaskaran Raman, Mumbai, Professor, Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Advocate
Ishwarlal S. Agarwal, Mumbai Advocate
Tanveer Nizam, Mumbai
Dr. Susan Raj, Chattisgrah, BSc Nurse, MSW(M&P), Doctorate Humanities, Behavior Specialist
Jagannath Chaterjee, Bhubhaneshwar, Social Activist
Dr. Abhay Chedda, Mumbai, BHMS, CCAH, FCAH
Dr. Gayatri Panditrao, Pune, Homeopathic Physician, BHMS, PGDEMS
Dr. Rashmi Menon, Mumbai, BHMS, ChT
Rossamma Thomas, Pala, Kottayam, Kerala, Freelance Journalist
Ambar Koiri, Mumbai, Awaken India Movement
Dr. G Prema, Tamil Nadu, Classical Homeopath, Aasil Health Care
Dr. S. G. Vombatkere, Mysuru, Human Rights Activist Advocate
Anand Singh Bahrawat, Indore, High Court of Indore Advocate
Vijay Kurle, Mumbai
Advocate L Shunondo Chandiramani, Indore, High Court of Indore

SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN

If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

4.6 28 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

55 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mgeo
mgeo
Dec 21, 2023 7:18 AM

The synthetic spike protein.. resulted in clotting, bleeding, heart problems and brain blood clotting as well as neurodegenerative problems.
The jab is not a vaccine for various reasons. Over 1,000 subsequent studies show that it is harmful. It infects, maims or kills in the short- or medium term by attacking every bodily system or organ. It is a witches’ brew of covert compounds and elements including graphene, magnetic material, self-assembling hydrogel, stainless steel, etc. Most of the medium-term harm comes from corrupted DNA. Most of the pre-jab “covid” deaths in 2020 came from euthanasia, a part of the effort to slash pensions, welfare and other obligations.

Steve
Steve
Dec 20, 2023 11:32 PM

Why do we talk about who can do what to us? Why do we accept the”section 2, paragraph 3 sub section 2 rules”.
Why do we comply? Why?
Let’s accept we are free ,if we don’t accept.
Nobody controls your life unless you accept their authority.

Erik Nielsen
Erik Nielsen
Dec 20, 2023 11:48 PM
Reply to  Steve

“Power is only power if you accept it”, (Mao).

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
Dec 20, 2023 4:46 PM

The World Health Organization’s broad definition of health . . . reflected an understanding of . . . the public health industry’s shameful facilitation of fascism.

The Health Department will be the most fundamental of all the departments of State.

All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.

To David Bell

Don’t you think you should cut the denial and recognise the pattern? This is that the Public Health industry is inherently and inescapably fascist. It habitually merges State and corporate power in controlling society and overriding the rights of individuals. Moreover, it was crafted by the likes of H.G. Wells as a totalitarian system of control long before the rise of 1930’s Fascism. And it employs State violence to impose and enforce ideological conformity – be it to medical materialism or transhumanist wokism. Furthermore, the “broad definition of health” is the very essence of fascist totalitarianism. It equates to the “nothing outside the state” ideology of Mussolini!

https://econpapers.repec.org/article/blaajecsc/v_3a82_3ay_3a2023_3ai_3a5_3ap_3a395-409.htm
Pandemic preparedness and the road to international fascism
David Bell
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2023, vol. 82, issue 5, 395-409

Abstract: The World Health Organization’s broad definition of health embraces physical, mental and social well‐being. Expressed in its 1946 constitution alongside concepts of community participation and national sovereignty, it reflected an understanding of a world emerging from centuries of colonialist oppression and the public health industry’s shameful facilitation of fascism. . . .

G.K. Chesterton – Eugenics and Other Evils (1922)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/25308

We now pass from mere individual men who obviously cannot be trusted, even if they are individual medical men, with such despotism over their neighbours; and we come to consider whether the Eugenists have at all clearly traced any more imaginable public authority, any apparatus of great experts or great examinations to which such risks of tyranny could be trusted. They are not very precise about this either; indeed, the great difficulty I have throughout in considering what are the Eugenist’s proposals is that they do not seem to know themselves. Some philosophic attitude which I cannot myself connect with human reason seems to make them actually proud of the dimness of their definitions and the uncompleteness of their plans. The Eugenic optimism seems to partake generally of the nature of that dazzled and confused confidence, so common in private theatricals, that it will be all right on the night. They have all the ancient despotism, but none of the ancient dogmatism. If they are ready to reproduce the secrecies and cruelties of the Inquisition, at least we cannot accuse them of offending us with any of that close and complicated thought, that arid and exact logic which narrowed the minds of the Middle Ages; they have discovered how to combine the hardening of the heart with a sympathetic softening of the head. Nevertheless, there is one large, though vague, idea of the Eugenists, which is an idea, and which we reach when we reach this problem of a more general supervision.

It was best presented perhaps by the distinguished doctor who wrote the article on these matters in that composite book which Mr. Wells edited, and called “The Great State.” He said the doctor should no longer be a mere plasterer of paltry maladies, but should be, in his own words, “the health adviser of the community.” . . .

 
https://archive.org/details/TheGreatState
H.G. Wells et al (1912)
Prefatory Note to The Great State

It is interesting to note certain juxtapositions; this is not a socialist volume, and the constructive spirit has long since passed beyond the purely socialist range. Neither Sir Ray Lankester, nor Mr. Haynes nor Mr. Fry would dream of calling himself a socialist; the former two would quite readily admit they were individualists. That old and largely fallacious antagonism of socialist and individualist is indeed dissolving out of contemporary thought altogether.

Health and Healing in the Great State
By C. J. Bond, F.R.C.S.
Chapter V. (pp. 143-80)
(p.174)

The enormous importance of the problem makes it a matter of vital concern that the ingoing information and the outgoing energy of a National Health Service should be co-ordinated in one central brain in one department under the control of a Minister of Health, and this Minister must combine in himself, or be able to obtain at first-hand, medical knowledge and a knowledge of biological Sociology; the Health Department will be the most fundamental of all the departments of State. It will be called upon to advise other departments concerning the biological principles upon which education and labour must be founded, upon which the activities of the soldier, sailor, and other public servants must be guided; and upon which the control and reformation of the mentally deficient, the pauper, and the criminal must be carried out.

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
Dec 20, 2023 9:47 PM

The Origins of Public Health

Even now the problem of how to eliminate this residuum of human unimprovability urgently presses for solution.

Health and Healing in the Great State
By C. J. Bond, F.R.C.S.
Chapter V. (pp. 143-80)

pp. 151-52

Our very familiarity with suffering and disharmony has clouded our vision: we accept the presence of disease as necessary, and we forget the enormous waste of human life which these ages of wandering in the wilderness of disease have caused. We can with difficulty gauge the gain in capacity for productive labour that the saving of even a few infant lives implies. Ignorance and Vice, Vice-caused disease and disease-produced Vice – these have also contributed towards the bankruptcy in Health of our city toilers and city dwellers. Disease and Poverty, leanness of body and leanness of soul, these work hand in hand, and these also must disappear in the Great State in the new era of Free Trade in human capacity as well as in material possessions.

But besides these failures in adjustment to diseases which come from without, there are also disharmonies which come from within. There are deficient capacities as well as injurious surroundings, there are errors in individual development of an hereditary kind.

These inborn deficiencies represent isolated flaws in that mosaic pattern of mental and bodily constitution which recent biological research tells us is the hereditary equipment of each individual; they may even represent a total failure in hereditary design, such as we find in the innately criminal and the congenitally feeble-minded. For such as these there will be neither use nor room in the Great State.

Even now the problem of how to eliminate this residuum of human unimprovability urgently presses for solution. The drain of unproductive existence on productive activity is already far too great, far greater than is necessary, as we believe, to favour the growth or to call forth the exercise of benevolence. The altruistic feelings of mankind can be more efficiently promoted by exercise in other fields and on worthier objects.

Man has no more power to overtake the results of anti-social conduct in the field of race production than in any other field of human activity. Here, as elsewhere, the only way of escape is to set about the elimination of capacity for anti-social conduct, or, if this be as yet impossible, to prevent as far as may be its exercise by those unfortunate individuals who inherit it. Our hope of success lies, not in a return to the old regime of natural selection, but in an extension of the newer method of environmental control.

We must learn, and that quickly, to apply to the problem of Race Culture those methods which we have already employed successfully in our struggle with disease. If, owing to lack of knowledge, further advance along Positive Eugenic lines should be at present too difficult, we can at any rate make a beginning by preventing the perpetuation of those characters which lead to race destruction.

NickM
NickM
Dec 23, 2023 2:33 PM

“We must learn, and that quickly, to apply to the problem of Race Culture those methods which we have already employed successfully in our struggle with disease.” — By C. J. Bond, F.R.C.S.

Do tell us, Dr.Bond, about the Medical Professions’ great successes in their struggle against the common cold. Not to mention cancer, heart, neurological degeneration, pain and ingrowing toenails.

NickM
NickM
Dec 20, 2023 3:25 PM

WHO’s massive conflict of interest should disqualify it from any role in world health.

Clear as crystal; the nub of the matter. If the UN were staffed by highly competent and conscientious persons (such as Scott Ritter) there would be some guarantee that these same WHO preposals would be applied for the public good. But with the present Private funding by parties with glaring business interests, all WHO measures — proposed under the exact same titles as above — would inevitably conspire against the Public good.

“Businessmen never get together, whether at work or for relaxation, without devising some Con-spiracy against the public” — Adam Smith, The Wealth of the Nations.

Tiggs
Tiggs
Dec 20, 2023 1:39 PM

https://t.me/wch_org/4613?single
The World Council For Health are on this. Look them up & join the fight. 👍

Freecus
Freecus
Dec 20, 2023 12:57 PM

It is really the UN membership system that we all need to exit from, just look at their control mechanisms and agencies:
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-system
https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/un_system_chart.pdf

Antonym
Antonym
Dec 20, 2023 11:31 AM

Finally I can really agree with Colin, but why limit halting the ‘WHO is who’ scheme to only India? This WEF club should be stopped world wide: the have net zero credibility left after their ‘Covid19’ advises.

Let's be Frank Joshua
Let's be Frank Joshua
Dec 20, 2023 2:34 PM
Reply to  Antonym

It is not limiting it to India. This is about publicising the letter due to a request by one of the signatories. You never did answer my questions from a couple of months back. Who are you? Why do you support foreign imperialism in India? Why do you attempt to denigrate those who call it out? Who is paying you to do that?

Antonym
Antonym
Dec 21, 2023 3:48 AM

Who is paying you to only hammer Modi and ignore Xi Jinping + dozens of other leaders of other developing countries? Which NGO? Soros?

Let's be Frank Joshua
Let's be Frank Joshua
Dec 21, 2023 7:11 AM
Reply to  Antonym

You are still not answering my questions. Whose pocket are you in? Why are you supporting the pro-foreign corporate agenda in India. Which NGO are you with? Soros? And please, no more whataboutism. It gets tedious. Stay on point and answer. If these questions are too difficult, we can even start things easy – who are you?

Antonym
Antonym
Dec 22, 2023 1:46 AM

You first: you’re using the Off-Guardian megaphone.

By the way, I am supporting a foreign corporate agenda you write? Based on what, having a different view point from you?

My point stands supported with 90% of your articles: they always are negative on Modi, a clear pattern. Off-Guardian is a world wide view site.

Let's be Frank Joshua
Let's be Frank Joshua
Dec 22, 2023 4:43 AM
Reply to  Antonym

So, you still refuse to answer the questions.

Based on what? Based on you decrying every article written on India that calls out the foreign-backed agenda, which is destroying Indian agriculture, livelihoods and culture.

You cannot grasp it is the system that is being critiqued and not any one individual like Modi.

Your questions on the motives for writing these articles were answered on here about two years ago (intentions, NGO links, funding etc.). You implied the answers were lies as they did not confirm your accusations.

Your questions were answered. It’s about time you reciprocated.

Cela
Cela
Dec 20, 2023 8:45 AM

PHEIC.
FAKE.
Knock knock.
Who’s there?
WHO.

Johnny
Johnny
Dec 20, 2023 4:42 AM

‘Lies, damn lies and statistics’
Someone with a better analytical mind and grasp of statistics might be able to interpret this:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-20/mortality-rates-australia-covid-excess/103241640

Johnny
Johnny
Dec 20, 2023 4:25 AM

Here’s the Ruling Ghouls having a party:

comment image

Bob Moran, of course.

Johnny
Johnny
Dec 20, 2023 8:09 AM
Reply to  Johnny

More of a Bloodbath really.
(Sanguin Balneum).

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
Dec 20, 2023 10:46 AM
Reply to  Johnny

Love Big Mike!

Antonym
Antonym
Dec 20, 2023 11:41 AM
Reply to  Johnny

Here one of the few child survivors of that Cabal speaking: Ronald Bernard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT_8DTjbNks

Paul Prichard
Paul Prichard
Dec 20, 2023 12:12 AM

Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2023-12-18. Mass negligent homicide for those manufacturing the vaccines. Insidious immune subversive mechanisms (blog, gab, tweet, pic1, pic2, pic3, pic4).

NickM
NickM
Dec 20, 2023 3:33 PM
Reply to  Paul Prichard

From your Link (search Mass negligent homicide);

“Direct talk, correct and unambiguous conclusion, stated by @P_McCulloughMD :”Any time a biopharmaceutical product remains on the market, despite excess mortality, and mounting and mounting evidence suggesting greater and greater deaths are accumulating with each and every day that the COVID-19 vaccines are left on the market, that does qualify as mass negligent homicide for all of those who are responsible for manufacturing the vaccines, distributing them, administering them, and then promoting them; each and every person that ever encouraged, pressured, coerced, or threatened reprisal for one of these COVID-19 vaccines is complicit in a crime against humanity. And that crime is mass negligent homicide!” (tweet)

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
Dec 20, 2023 12:07 AM

The Government wants to best protect the UK population including from future pandemics. COVID-19 has demonstrated that no-one is safe until we are all safe, and that effective global cooperation is needed to better protect the UK and other countries around the world from the detrimental health, social and economic impacts of pandemics and other health threats.

“No-one is safe until we are all safe”. This is the mantra of Public Health. It is inherently a collectivist, totalitarian ideology. It’s not sufficient to block or reform the WHO; nor even to exit the WHO. Instead, it’s necessary to abolish Public Health.

All the beneficial services which are supplied under the heading of Public Health, can be provided under different headings: Public Works, Sanitation, Environmental Standards, National Medical Service, etc. 

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/648609
Government responded
This response was given on 17 November 2023
The UK Government will not end our WHO membership. We are committed to working with the WHO to tackle the world’s health issues. We do not and will never cede sovereign powers through our partnership.

Freddie Sayers spoke to the new WHO Nudge Unit chair to discuss the politics of public health

https://unherd.com/thepost/whos-susan-michie
By Freddie Sayers
July 27, 2022

Susan Michie, the new Chair of the WHO’s “Technical Advisory Group on Behavioural Insights”, . . . explained that the new science of Public Health is collectivist by nature, seeking to provide group-wide solutions to health challenges, and so it fundamentally downplays individual rights. “What I don’t see a lot of amongst my colleagues maybe, but certainly the media, and especially the papers that you mentioned, would be much more emphasis on individual freedom, individual rights, rather than taking a sort of more collective population approach.”

WHO Nudge Unit chief: So what if I’m a Communist?
UnHerd
Jul 27, 2022
Freddie Sayers reflects on the appointment of Prof. Susan Michie, who he interviewed in 2020 for LockdownTV, to the WHO Behavioural Insights advisory group.
[link to 2020 interview via youtube]

Erik Nielsen
Erik Nielsen
Dec 20, 2023 11:54 PM

In reality Stalin and Cheka did a good job because they purged out all the filth, and they did it only to protect the poor and vulnerable.

Jerry Alatalo
Jerry Alatalo
Dec 19, 2023 11:25 PM

“Do not reform the World Health Organization … DESTROY the World Health Organization!”

MattC
MattC
Dec 20, 2023 8:46 AM
Reply to  Jerry Alatalo

And all its sponsors such as B Gates

Veri Tas
Veri Tas
Dec 19, 2023 10:36 PM

I doubt that the letter will do any good. How much did governments listen to those brave scientists and doctors who protested the useless and harmful pandemic measures? How much are they listening to them now that the numbers and evidence of harm are in? On the contrary, they are doubling down and continuing.

Some pertinent quotes:

“Medicine and public health are compromised by the highest echelons of science, industry and public administration for the geopolitical objectives of international cohabitation, preservation of resources, environmental conservation and decarbonization, all of which hinge on depopulation.”
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/the-subversion-of-medicine-and-public-health-by-international-securityprerogatives-2161-1165-1000208.pdf

I dread government in the name of science. That is how tyrannies come in. – C. S. Lewis

“The minute medicine seeks to impose its views, it loses its status as a science and becomes an ideology.” – Larry Malerba, DO, DHt in The Rise of Scientific Fundamentalism

“At the end of times the merchants of the world will deceive the nations through their Pharmacia.”  (sorcery) – Rev 18:23

STJOHNOFGRAFTON
STJOHNOFGRAFTON
Dec 20, 2023 1:31 AM
Reply to  Veri Tas

That letter may do no good but regardless of the outcome it is the moral thing to do. If the letter is deliberately ignored then that is a moral travesty and those doing the ignoring will eventually pay the price, whether in this life or the next, all according to God’s economy summed up in Galatians 6:7 (ESV) “Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap”.

Erik Nielsen
Erik Nielsen
Dec 21, 2023 5:43 PM

Exactly my opinion!

eliger
eliger
Dec 19, 2023 9:18 PM

A Letter from India: Stop WHO’s ‘Pandemic

Is India having an selections???? it is the exact same template they used in E.U and Italy
just before the selections.

Italy had a savage lockdown and no jab no work policy and vaccine passport was in play heavily…
it was savage there , 1 minutes after the lockdown started to end and anger towards the leaders, they flip the switch and blamed the work shy, blamed the migrants (notice a pattern????) and the mind control kicked in AGAIN WITH THE POPULIST voters and the twitter and alt oligarchy merchants told there shills in alternative media (99.8% of them) to all start playing videos of this new Italy lady Conservative leader condemning the lockdown (kindoff) and bill gate zzzzz and baddies at WHO and the all them usual bell gimmicks one sees in the digital platform as icke calls it… the mainstream media pouncing around as alternative to the media sphere when there not unfortunately even OFF G played along for while with this new Italy lady PM superhero.

Fighting the deep state of Italy Pm @ cop 28

Behold, the Globalist-controlled ‘conservative’ Prime Minister of Italy, Giorgia Meloni
People who are cheering on a political solution to this mess are deluding themselves.

Johnny
Johnny
Dec 20, 2023 2:05 AM
Reply to  eliger

⁸Since she has come Italy’s government has raised the cash ceiling,legally banned lab meat. The official WEF narrative is that migrants and the poor are most affected by lockdowns and covid,her saying otherwise is not part of the narrative. She is obviously picking her battles. You are extremely naive thinking a leader will come and do everything ‘right'(for lack of a better word). The Arabs and Chinese talk at Cop every year yet continue to increase oil and coal production. For a lot of nations its a gimmick to appear and say a few words. Certainly do not think Meloni is a savior by any means but definitely the best option thats offered to voters at the moment. Same goes for Orban and a few others. Remember in chaos is freedom,when everyone is on the same page thats the worry.

Ort
Ort
Dec 20, 2023 7:25 PM
Reply to  eliger

I don’t remember OffG’s take on Meloni’s election, but FWIW The Duran pundits were optimistically heartened when she was elected.

IIRC, in addition to her seemingly contrarian denunciations of the Megadeath Virus of Doom Scamdemic policies, much was made of a video of a fiery Meloni speech in which she passionately touted what are generally known as traditional or conservative “family values”. 

So, as you point out, these early enthusiasts believed that she was another one of those conservative, nationalist “anti-politicians” who would resist, and perhaps reform, the EU’s sociopolitical decadence. 

At least with The Duran pundits, in an astonishingly short time Meloni’s deceptive charms wore off. But, as PT Barnum observed, there’s a sucker born every minute. 🤨

niko
niko
Dec 19, 2023 8:46 PM

comment image

niko
niko
Dec 19, 2023 8:45 PM

comment image

niko
niko
Dec 19, 2023 8:40 PM

comment image

Thomas Paine
Thomas Paine
Dec 19, 2023 8:11 PM

Interesting. I have a feeling that, not too long ago, somebody in power suddenly realized that they have the perfect tool for creating total control for themselves already in place–being able to declare epidemics, quarantines, states of emergency, measures which in essence shut down legitimate government and put dictators (“dictators” in the ancient Roman sense Roman dictator – Wikipedia) in charge. Governments always did have this power. But until just the other day they apparently didn’t realize how far they can go with it. It’s so easy to just declare an epidemic (I mean, who’s going to argue with you? Yeah, right, I got an electron microscope out in my garage.) and then go hog wild doing anything you want to people.

underground poet
underground poet
Dec 20, 2023 1:35 AM
Reply to  Thomas Paine

Plan A, wing it.

rubberheid
rubberheid
Dec 19, 2023 7:58 PM

PHEIC ?

man, they are rubbing our faces in it!

gadzooks! tis but a test,

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
Dec 19, 2023 6:15 PM

Tyrants being tyrants…the tree of Liberty thirsts.

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
Dec 19, 2023 6:06 PM

When truth was important, preventable diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, and the effects of undernutrition were the priority of the international health community.

– David Bell

Bell thinks the above statement represents the good-old-days of Public Health – before it supposedly got corrupted. However, it includes at least one, four-decade-long hoax, scam and crime against humanity (i.e. AIDS). This is what Bell wants to return to. Moreover, he thinks people were vaccinated against an illness called “Covid-19” – the issue in question being one of cost-benefit analysis.

In terms of equity, it would be ludicrous to divert resources from African children dying of malaria in order to vaccinate them against Covid-19. Such a resource diversion would be expected to kill more children than could conceivably be saved – mass Covid vaccination is far more costly than malaria management.

https://brownstone.org/articles/how-did-the-corruption-of-public-health-happen
How Did the Corruption of Public Health Happen?
By David Bell
Nov 1, 2023

https://brownstone.org/author/david-bell
David Bell, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO), Programme Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland, and Director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in Bellevue, WA, USA.

PBW
PBW
Dec 20, 2023 10:12 AM

“I once met someone so naive that you could lock them down, force them to wear a mask, ban their kids from school, tell them to despise and report on neighbors, and then ban them from work and restaurants unless they get injected, and they still wouldn’t recognize fascism.”

David Bell MD PhD

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
Dec 20, 2023 2:25 PM
Reply to  PBW

The vast majority of people don’t recognise Fascism – and that applies to most of the so-called “freedom movement”. For instance, most of them support extreme coercive systems of pseudo-medical treatment and incarceration, including psychiatry and the Barrington Declaration. As pointed out above, Bell supports a four-decade-long hoax, scam and crime against humanity (i.e. AIDS). And by implication, he also supports the State-enforced silencing and persecution of dissenting voices.

Thomas Szasz – New Preface to The Myth of Mental Illness (2010)

Formerly, when Church and State were allied, people accepted theological justifications for state-sanctioned coercion. Today, when Medicine and the State are allied, people accept therapeutic justifications for state-sanctioned coercion. This is how, some two hundred years ago, psychiatry became an arm of the coercive apparatus of the state. And this is why today all of medicine threatens to become transformed from personal therapy into political tyranny.

https://www.szasz.com/Szasz50newpreface.pdf
https://www.szasz.com

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
Dec 22, 2023 5:04 AM

This declaration is just an attempt to implement global communism under the rubric of “health”. And I could imagine that Susan Michie would be more than happy with it. So now the revolution has been betrayed again and it turns out that the evil, global capitalists had their own agenda all along. Who’d have thunk it!

https://brownstone.org/articles/how-did-the-corruption-of-public-health-happen
How Did the Corruption of Public Health Happen?
By David Bell
Nov 1, 2023

International public health is a mess. Once seen generally as a public good, the focus of the World Health Organization (WHO) now more closely resembles a scheme for extracting private profit from the public purse. . . . There was a time when things were different, and public health promoted genuine equity and decentralization [links to declaration]

The Declaration

https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/almaata-declaration-en.pdf?sfvrsn=7b3c2167_2
Declaration of Alma-Ata
International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, 6-12
September 1978

The International Conference on Primary Health Care, meeting in Alma-Ata this twelfth day of September in the year Nineteen hundred and seventy-eight, expressing the need for urgent action by all governments, all health and development workers, and the world community to protect and promote the health of all the people of the world, hereby makes the following

Declaration:

I. The Conference strongly reaffirms that health, which is a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, is a fundamental human right and that the attainment of the highest possible level of health is a most important world-wide social goal whose realization requires the action of many other social and economic sectors in addition to the health sector.

II. The existing gross inequality in the health status of the people particularly between developed and developing countries as well as within countries is politically, socially and economically unacceptable and is, therefore, of common concern to all countries.

III. Economic and social development, based on a New International Economic Order, is of basic importance to the fullest attainment of health for all and to the reduction of the gap between the health status of the developing and developed countries. The promotion and protection of the health of the people is essential to sustained economic and social development and contributes to a better quality of life and to world peace.

IV. The people have the right and duty to participate individually and collectively in the planning and implementation of their health care.

etc

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
Dec 22, 2023 2:15 PM

Once seen generally as a public good

The people have the right and duty to participate individually and collectively in the planning and implementation of their health care.

I don’t recall the public ever being consulted on this or similar declarations. It was never put to the vote. Instead, it’s just a technocratic resetting agenda with a heavy bias toward to communistic totalitarianism. As I state above, we need to abolish Public Health!

Martin Usher
Martin Usher
Dec 19, 2023 5:39 PM

The problem with lockdowns is that they affect people differently. For the relatively settled and well off (the sort of people who might be involved in proposing WHO rules, for example) a ‘lockdown’ is just a form of enforced holiday. It can even be a welcome change to the usual work routine. For a lot of people — most, I’d guess — being confined to one’s home or immediate locale can have devastating financial and social effects. Just think — its really easy to “work from home” if you have a nice suburban house with adequate space to set up a little office area (assuming you didn’t have such a thing already) with adequate utilities, network connections and, of course, a well paid job that can be worked from home. Meanwhile “back in the real world” things are neither as easy nor as convenient. Add in the demands and complexities of families who are suddenly tasked to school at home kids and you’ve got a formula for social disaster.

Lizzyh7
Lizzyh7
Dec 19, 2023 8:38 PM
Reply to  Martin Usher

And let’s don’t mention all those jobs that cannot be done from home – water, power, sewer maintenance, truckers who haul your food to the grocery store, warehouse personnel who load those trucks, care givers, all those people who make our world function. Oh wait, was putting them out of work intentional? Hmmmmm…..

mgeo
mgeo
Dec 21, 2023 6:41 AM
Reply to  Lizzyh7

Not necessarily. After their current employers go bankrupt, they can work for a pittance for the global fat cats who buy up such businesses,

Elmo
Elmo
Dec 19, 2023 8:42 PM
Reply to  Martin Usher

Yes, and all this to supposedly prevent the spread of a so-called “virus” that has never been proven to exist!

eliger
eliger
Dec 19, 2023 9:10 PM
Reply to  Martin Usher

Spending that much time with the family for some caused many issues.
cleverly done by them knowing it would created conflict within the house hold.
My 56 year old friend was not allowed to see her own parents as she refused to wear a mask and they turned in her.
I agree with what your saying Maxwell the lockdown did not effect many top earners or
the really self employed.

The keyworker title was a joke.

underground poet
underground poet
Dec 20, 2023 1:38 AM
Reply to  Martin Usher

In tent city we make our last stand.

Nah
Nah
Dec 19, 2023 4:38 PM

The psychopaths will not stop maiming and killing us if we don’t put them out of action. Writing letter and protesting will not change one bit.

Bloobock
Bloobock
Dec 19, 2023 3:39 PM

As Sylvia Shawcross pointed out last week, they have no Plan B, so these kinds of registries of dissent are well-meaning but ultimately impotent… and a bit narcissistic. The Great Barrington Declaration, for instance, wasn’t particularly great. It was okay, I guess. But it changed nothing. In the end, it wasn’t much more than an ad in the Yellow Pages for the services of a self-ostracized group of formerly conventional but now unavoidably alternative medical practitioners.

We don’t need more fringe-elite petitions or statements of vague philosophical opposition to very practical tyrannies. What we need is a covenant with teeth, a plebe-to-plebe (rather than elite-to-plebe) promise of mutual defense and support, with a tangible and plausible threat of real, physical resistance.

The WHO can decree whatever it wants to decree. We also have the freedom to decree. We can decree not to recognize the existence of invisible pandemics whose declaration occurs outside of public, regional referendums. We can decree to physically protect the people in our community from any public health enforcement activities based on unrecognized crises. We can decree to ignore quarantine directives collectively, to travel in packs, to outnumber the beat cops assigned to enforce the directives. We can decree to crowd-fund the rent or property taxes of community members whose bank accounts are frozen as result of protest or resistance. We can put our honor on the line, as it should have been last time. Are there any existing petitions or covenants along these lines?

They have no Plan B because they think roads, bridges and fields are clear — that, when the WHO klaxon next sounds, they can march unmolested from their army bases and precinct houses direct to our front doors, needles in hand. And, based on the unimaginably pathetic resistance we put up 2020-2022, they’re perfectly justified in thinking that. If this were a real war, the roads would already be blocked with Czech hedgehogs, the bridges blown, and the fields sown with landmines. If they thought we had any fight left in us, they wouldn’t even have a Plan A.

underground poet
underground poet
Dec 20, 2023 1:41 AM
Reply to  Bloobock

I had to laugh at Plan A, until Plan B was a physical return to the 1870’s where I said I could put up with Plan A a little longer.

Erik Nielsen
Erik Nielsen
Dec 21, 2023 7:12 AM
Reply to  Bloobock

This deserves a 33 thumbs up.
As I sometimes have pointed out, the sheeple are the heart of all our problems, both for the Elite and us. If they are gone the rest is easy.