Climate-Con and the Media-Censorship Complex – Part 1
Jesse Smith
The gauntlet has been cast by the media-censorship complex. Just prior to this year’s annual globalist confab in Davos, the World Economic Forum (WEF) announced that misinformation and disinformation are currently the greatest threats to humanity, with the release of its Global Risks Report 2024.
From a list of 34 risks, the WEF report identifies mis- and disinformation as the top threats to global stability over the next two years and the fifth most dangerous threats over the next 10 years. Of particular concern is false information that could affect elections, democratic processes, and social cohesion in various countries worldwide, as well as sentiment contradicting the “consensus” narrative about climate change.
Echoing these same concerns, the United Nations (UN), its strategic partner in advancing the climate-focused 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, has previously stated much of the same.
In Information Integrity on Digital Platforms, a June 2023 UN policy brief recommending a code of conduct for digital platforms, Secretary-General António Guterres stated:
The ability to disseminate large-scale disinformation to undermine scientifically established facts poses an existential risk to humanity (A/75/982, para. 26) and endangers democratic institutions and fundamental human rights. These risks have further intensified because of rapid advancements in technology, such as generative artificial intelligence. Across the world, the United Nations is monitoring how mis- and disinformation and hate speech can threaten progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. It has become clear that business as usual is not an option.”
All the UN’s 2030 Agenda plans, activities, and expenditures are based on the belief that we face an existential climate crisis caused by human activity and dangerous greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2). This conviction is clearly outlined in a fact sheet produced by Verified, a joint initiative of the United Nations and Purpose, launched in 2020 to respond to mis- and disinformation about “intersecting crises like COVID-19 and climate change.” The document states unequivocally that:
- Climate change is happening.
- Climate change is caused by human activity.
- Scientists agree that humans are responsible for climate change.
- Every fraction of a degree of warming matters.
- The climate is changing faster than humans, plants, and animals can adapt.
- Climate change is a major threat to people’s health.
- Natural gas is a fossil fuel, not a clean source of energy.
- Clean energy technologies produce far less carbon pollution than fossil fuels.
- Entire countries already rely 100 percent on renewable electricity.
- Renewable energy will soon be the world’s top source of electricity.
- Renewable energy is cheaper than fossil fuels.
- Solar panels and wind turbines make good use of land.
- The transition to clean energy will create millions of jobs.
By stating that disinformation is undermining these supposed scientific facts, Guterres rests his entire argument on the premise that each of the above statements is absolutely, indisputably, and undeniably true. Like Guterres, all who espouse this climate narrative have no tolerance for any opinion, theory, or evidence that runs contrary to this dogged notion.
Verified is backed by powerful globalist NGOs including the Rockefeller Foundation and Omidyar Network. It has an extensive list of major media collaborators such as Al Jazeera, Clear Channel, Facebook, Reddit, Spotify, TikTok, and Twitter. Melissa Fleming, Verified co-founder and current UN Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications, has made it known that social media is a huge threat to climate science and other UN initiatives and is particularly bothered by Twitter/X for allowing rampant disinformation.
It is clear from these reports that any dissent from the established climate narrative threatens the advancement of the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Now, urgent calls to extinguish these threats have been issued so they can proceed with transforming the world unimpeded.
While many of the issues expressed in the Information Integrity report are legitimate and concerning, the UN via the World Health Organization (WHO) participates in disinformation by continuing to promote COVID-19 vaccines as safe and effective, when they have largely been proven to be ineffective and cause much harm. Their stance regarding climate change could also qualify as disinformation to the thousands of scientists who oppose this view but are being discredited as mere conspiracy theorists.
The following statement from the report underscores their frustration with “climate deniers” and the platforms they use to oppose the UN’s agenda:
…mis- and disinformation about the climate emergency are delaying urgently needed action to ensure a liveable future for the planet. Climate mis- and disinformation can be understood as false or misleading content that undercuts the scientifically agreed basis for the existence of human-induced climate change, its causes and impacts. Coordinated campaigns are seeking to deny, minimize or distract from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scientific consensus and derail urgent action to meet the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement. A small but vocal minority of climate science denialists continue to reject the consensus position and command an outsized presence on some digital platforms.”
(p. 12, emphasis added)
Globalists want conformity regarding climate change and will go to extreme lengths to marginalize, censor, and discredit dissenters. They talk a good game about enforcing universal freedom of expression, but on climate and other issues vital to their agenda, free speech is not tolerated. Though they readily acknowledge that controlling information may lead to greater levels of authoritarianism, surveillance, censorship, and the erosion of human rights, it seems they are willing to overlook these offenses to protect their precious climate agenda.
If they can successfully shut down debate about climate change, then soon any topic that threatens their aims will be off limits. The UN deems itself a protector of human rights but plays a major role in the media-censorship complex. Its attempts at crushing opposition to the climate narrative betrays their mission and reveals authoritarian tendencies.
Countering Digital Hate or Advocating Suppression?
A recently released report issued by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) claims that new forms of climate denial have emerged. These new arguments don’t deny that the climate is changing and is caused by human activity, but instead contend that:
- The impacts of global warming are beneficial or harmless.
- Climate solutions won’t work.
- Climate science and the climate movement are unreliable.
The basis for their report stems from use of “an AI based model called CARDS,” short for Computer-Assisted Recognition of Climate Change Denial and Skepticism. CARDS is designed to identify and categorize climate denialist claims in text. The researchers used CARDS to analyze YouTube video transcripts from 96 mostly right-wing, conservative leaning channels including prominent ones like BlazeTV, Jordan Peterson, and the Heartland Institute.
CCDH has a big gripe with social media companies they believe are not doing enough to stem the tide of rising climate denial. They want to eliminate the ability for any “climate denier” spreading “conspiracy theory statements” to financially benefit from their content, as evidenced in the following statements:
To support the global efforts to avert climate disaster, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and X should all demonetize and de-amplify New Denial content. Demonetizing climate denial removes the economic incentives underpinning its creation and protects advertisers from bankrolling harmful content. Moreover, de-amplifying climate denial limits its reach and visibility, allowing time for fact-checking and other protective measures to be applied where content is clearly contrary to the well-established scientific consensus on climate change”
p. 34; emphasis added
CCDH polling on social media usage tested respondents’ agreement with conspiracy theory statements, including the statement: “Humans are not the main cause of global temperature increases.” CCDH found that 43% of adults and 56% of teenagers who report high activity on social media expressed agreement with that statement. This link between social media usage and conspiracist belief illustrates why urgent action is needed to prioritize information integrity on digital platforms in climate policymaking”
p. 34; emphasis added
Their demonetization and censorship recommendations come even after admitting that the CARDS model is only up to 78% accurate, could not perform any fact checks on the claims made in the transcripts, and that lack of punctuation caused results to be skewed.
The CCDH is a sketchy, UK-based, advocacy group that has produced various reports inciting censorship against those they disagree with. Their efforts against “anti-vaxxers” culminated in several reports that led to the deplatforming, demonetizing, and discrediting of many individuals and organizations exposing pandemic-related fraud and COVID-19 vaccine falsehoods.
CCDH’s The New Climate Denial report has been promoted through mainstream outlets like CNN, MSN, Yahoo, and USA Today. It could impact the cited individuals and organizations the same way it affected those targeted in its Disinformation Dozen reports a few years ago. Though their stated mission is to “protect human rights and civil liberties online,” they practice the opposite by advocating the revocation of these rights for climate and vaccine narrative challengers.
How The Media-Censorship Complex Plans to Tackle Climate Dissent
Two things are very clear from the recent reports issued by the WEF, UN, and CCDH. One, is that climate skepticism is on the rise. The second, is that they are threatened by the very existence of those who dare to refute their narrative. Many strategies to stem the tide of climate cynicism have already been employed with new ones currently being tested.
If one dares to publicly question the science regarding climate change, one or more of the following tactics may be used to impede the effort:
- Awareness Campaigns
- Artificial Intelligence
- Censorship
- Civic Listening
- Content moderation
- Demonetization and Financial censorship
- Deplatforming
- Digital armies
- Education
- Fact checking
- Media and information literacy
- Prebunking/psychological inoculation
- Shadowbanning
- Trusted Messengers
- Text mining / Automated text analysis
- Whole-of-society approach
In addition to Verified and CCDH, other organizations utilizing these methods to silence opposers include:
- Climate Feedback
- Covering Climate Now
- European Media and Information Fund
- FactCheck.org
- Global Disinformation Index (GDI)
- International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) (Poynter Institute)
- Media Wise (Poynter Institute)
- Newsguard
- PolitiFact (Poynter Institute)
- Reuters
Each of these organizations are fueled and funded by many of the entities responsible for advancing the climate agenda, especially as it relates to the UN SDGs. This globalized amalgamation of media watchdogs, fact checkers, and disinformation regulators is powered by billion-dollar corporations, democratic and undemocratic governments, influential foundations, and powerful NGOs. The list includes The White House, U.S. State Department, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), The National Science Foundation, United Nations, Poynter Institute, National Endowment for Democracy, Open Society Foundations, Omidyar Network, Rockefeller Foundation, Rockefeller Family Fund, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and many more.
A plethora of legacy and social media companies also utilize the services provided by these organizations. A small sampling includes Associated Press, NPR, NBC News, Newsweek, The Washington Post, The Guardian, The Nation, The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, WhatsApp, Twitch, and LinkedIn. A look at Covering Climate Now’s list of partners provides an even broader view of the media’s enforcement of the climate agenda.
As if governments, corporations, and organizations weren’t enough, universities such as Columbia, Harvard, Oxford, and University of Southern California also perpetuate the climate propaganda by training journalists in their institutions.
By treating climate change as a national security threat, the U.S. Department of Defense and intelligence agencies have also been enlisted in the fight against mis- and disinformation.
In addition, individuals within both the left and right wings of the two-party paradigm collude to curtail free speech. It is a grave mistake to believe that calls for censorship from either side of the political spectrum are beneficial. They are both integral to perpetuating the media-censorship complex.
Why Has Climate Science Become Nondebatable?
If it wasn’t apparent before, it should now be crystal clear that there is a vast empire united against those questioning the climate narrative. They are determined to perpetuate the myth that there is universal consensus on the facts.
The truth is there is no real consensus on climate science. The UN and its network of public-private partnerships (PPP) just make it seem that way. In this regard, the UN climate stance is akin to Anthony Fauci’s claim that questioning him was like questioning science itself. Honest and open debate on the issue should be continued by allowing opponents opportunities to present their case without fear of censorship, harassment, exclusion, or cancellation. Instead, there is constant reinforcement of a fictional consensus while divergent opinions are labeled as dangerous conspiracies.
Climate consensus figures as high as 97 and even 99.9 percent have been touted by former US Presidents, researchers, and media outlets in the past. But is this claim true? If it were, then why would there be so much effort to silence a mere one to three percent who deviate from the scientific echo chamber? Would all these battles be worth the time, energy, and money being spent on just a few dissidents, as they claim?
Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous. Read more: http://t.co/4lEEBYtVqf
— Barack Obama (@BarackObama) May 16, 2013
Much of what qualifies as climate research is funded by institutions that have already bought into the doomsday mantra of impending man-made disaster. The industry is rigged to favor researchers who set out to prove “official” claims. Funding and publication are often withheld from those who do not toe this line. As a result, statistics are skewed to make it seem like there is universal consensus.
Past research has demonstrated claims of scientific consensus on climate change to be fraudulent. In a paper published in 2023, a team of researchers disproved the conclusions reached in a 2021 study claiming there was greater than 99% consensus on climate science in peer-reviewed scientific literature.
The claims were refuted by demonstrating that studies expressing neutral opinions were misclassified and papers communicating skepticism were ignored. This clear case of academic malfeasance is not the only example where scientists used falsified research and conspired to silence those contradicting the alleged consensus. Even if the 99% consensus assertions were valid, the notion of consensus-as-truth does not pass the test for authentic scientific validation. The majority can still be wrong.
A recent article posted by The Good Men Project, which “exposed” the climate deniers behind the recent farmer protests in Europe, proclaimed that “Scientific consensus on human-caused climate change is equivalent to that on evolution.” This statement came in response to a request from protest organizer James Melville for a national debate on climate and net zero policies. Never mind that evolution is not a proven fact. Equating climate change to evolution shows it is also unproven and can be argued against. Again, the majority can still be wrong!
Remember when Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson made claims that their COVID vaccines were all well over 90% effective in stopping transmission? As evidenced in the following video, those proclamations did not hold up very well, did they?
“The Vaccine is 100% Safe and Effective”
🔊 … 🤣 pic.twitter.com/O1RbSvt2EY
— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) September 25, 2023
A massive army has been assembled to ensure that rival claims will not see the light of day for long. But why is it that the powers that be would rather falsify research, smear dissenters, and spend billions of dollars to silence critics rather than continuing to debate the issues?
An article written by Gregory Whitstone, Executive Director of the CO2 Coalition, presents a valid argument for continued scientific debate on climate change, stating:
You have likely heard that 97% of scientists agree on human-driven climate change. You may also have heard that those who don’t buy into the climate-apocalypse mantra are science-deniers. The truth is that a whole lot more than 3% of scientists are skeptical of the party line on climate. A whole lot more…
There are some scientific truths that are quantifiable and easily proven, and with which, I am confident, at least 97% of scientists agree. Here are two:
- Carbon dioxide concentration has been increasing in recent years.
- Temperatures, as measured by thermometers and satellites, have been generally increasing in fits and starts for more than 150 years.
What is impossible to quantify is the actual percentage of warming that is attributable to increased anthropogenic (human-caused) CO2. There is no scientific evidence or method that can determine how much of the warming we’ve had since 1900 that was directly caused by us.
We know that temperature has varied greatly over the millennia. We also know that for virtually all of that time, global warming and cooling were driven entirely by natural forces, which did not cease to operate at the beginning of the 20th century.
The claim that most modern warming is attributable to human activities is scientifically insupportable. The truth is that we do not know. We need to be able to separate what we do know from that which is only conjecture.
How can greenhouse gases, particularly CO2 be the sole agent causing rising temperatures when it is an essential element for all life forms? Given the growing world population, it seems that greater levels of CO2would lead to greater benefits. Plants need CO2 to thrive, yet the fight against it is accelerating.
Scientists have now stated that cow burps and farts and even human breathing are bad for the environment because they contribute to the emission of methane and nitrous oxide, both believed to contribute to global warming. This is beyond absurd!
We are on the slippery slope to a dystopian nightmare if the trend toward censorship and marginalization continues. There is no good reason why continued debate featuring those on all sides of the issue should not be occurring, unless of course there are other reasons for ramming this fear-based agenda down our throats.
We’ll examine the other reasons in Part 2 of this series.
Jesse Smith is an American journalist and editor of Truth Unmuted, a news and opinion website dedicated to challenging globalist plans and ideologies like technocracy, transhumanism, the Great Reset, and Agenda 2030. Jesse currently lives in Mexico and writes about current events through the lens of a Biblical worldview. His articles have been published on Global Research, Activist Post, and TruthTalk.UK.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Thorium.
Ahahahahaha, you are so fucking stupid…hahahahaha
MCC ? Funk ‘Dat for a game of Cricket, BatShitCrazyComplex …
Con-census in science = religion / ideology + censorship, lawfare & inquisition.
When an organization like the US federal government or WEF declare misinformation et al to be dangerous threats, what they mean is threats to their own power. That should be obvious by now. We should be reading essays about the falseness of these organizations. We should be reading paeans to free speech.
If we face an existential threat, it is to our freedom, not the wanna-be-fascists.
The United Nations is proving itself to be infected with wanna-be-fascists. It may be time to jump ship.
Re: Energy is available in abundance! Well, if you have a technology to draw energy from the ether in a way allowing replacing the fuels used to run the civilization today, let me hear what it is. I’m all ears and I bet so are countless others. I’m afraid, however, that looking to genocided cultures is a case of hallucinatory wishful thinking. Oil is very likely replenishable. There is no reason why the same mechanism that has allowed oil to form shouldn’t continue working. The problem is that more is extracted than (potentially) replenished. It doesn’t matter whether oil is fossil, abiotic, or whether it’s the piss of some creature inhabiting the inside the Earth There are NO MODERN ENERGY-GENERATING TECHNOLOGIES THAT WOULD FREE HUMANITY. What are they? There is enough to go around if permitted? Man, pull your head out of your bum. Take any city in the world… Read more »
Do you really think that if there is the possibility to harness ‘free’ energy, that this technology would be shared with mankind given the current setup? What happened to Tesla’s aspirations for free electricity? Going back further, there are numerous examples of ancient structures around the world, which would have required advanced knowledge of some kind of technology both in design and construction (using a source of unknown energy?) – why is there little academic research into these?
If current forms of energy/resources are not sustainable, why is there no emphasis on reducing consumption? In fact, the opposite is closer to the truth..the general population are incentivised to buy more crap and consume more energy (through technology) whilst vast amounts of resources and energy are ploughed into reshaping the energy infrastructure to save a bit of carbon floating off into the atmosphere
I was asking for specific examples of the referenced technologies, ways of drawing energy from the ether, and so on. Not for conjectures that this or that must be true/false because of something you are unable to explain. How will you, or Tesla, get free electricity? Pull it out of your ass? Are you implying that the physical laws, such as the laws of thermodynamics, are wrong? Why is there no emphasis on reducing consumption? Well, you might say that there is, that they’re trying. Not very effectively, but on the other hand it’s kinda difficult to turn the course of history within just a few years. My guess is that they’ve been kicking the can down the road for too long and now they know shit what to do. But once again, that’s a strawman fallacy. Focus on energy and resources per se, not on the perception of human… Read more »
Funny, you should probably patent that solution.
I don’t proclaim to be an expert in physics, but it’s pretty obvious that we don’t possess a full understanding of the laws of this world/reality.
However, what I am alluding to is that science/research is driven in certain directions by the people who have the power/money, and the incentives for such is questionable. How can a new technology or innovation be adopted when not agreed and funded by certain levels of the societal structure? As such, certain lines of enquiry are dismissed (likely intentionally).
I agree that there is a scarcity of resources, but don’t really understand your perspective regarding sustainability when you dismiss the primary drivers in depletion based upon the imposed mode of thinking. What is your solution?
We’ll never possess a full understanding of the world, whatever it might mean, but the way things are is as good as it gets right now. Hypothesizing, in a wishful-thinking hallucinatory fashion, that there MUST BE something else is delusional. Based on current knowledge, there is zilch and a lot of the current knowledge is relatively sound – it allows the world to function the way it does. The fact that you’re not an expert in physics is a bit of a problem if you voice opinions about a subject of which you know nothing. Applying convoluted logic and positing that things must be different because there are lots of assholes around who try to take advantage of others and create all sorts of societal structures is shooting way off the target. Considering the state of the art, the way things are is that fossil fuels that have allowed unprecedented… Read more »
Fair enough, thanks for the explanation and can understand, to a certain extent, the direction you’re coming from. Yes, I agree that people should lower their expectations, and would probably be happier for it. However, the societal/cultural influence is real and overpowering and promotes the opposite, which ultimately is a disconnection from the actual lived natural world. At the same time, the net tightens on civil liberties as we are channeled into a digital control framework, which is likely the intended next phase of existence when the current system implodes.
If you want to approach things from societal perspective, let’s consider the very purpose of life, la raison d’etre. Look at the state to which civilization has developed – we live to consume. To create yet another artificial urge that could be satiated by yet another useless doodad, yet another useless service. Yet another fake tit, dick, artificial vagina, you name it. We burn shit like crazy, haul our obese asses from place to place needlessly, poisoning shit left and right. Meanwhile, none of this untold horseshit makes anybody any happier. People are fucked up in the head, pop pills, take drugs, drink booze like crazy. We’re unable to live with our own selves, let alone with other species and our natural habitat. There is no spiritual footing whatsoever. Things are pretty fucked up, you know. Civil liberties? If I were the devil’s advocate, et j’en suis un, I’d say… Read more »
Cold fusion, works fine in Moscow, not so much in Washington.
https://skepticalinquirer.org/2019/05/rossis-e-cat-expose-of-a-claimed-cold-fusion-device/
Its a study of human denial, if you can’t control the device through a patent, its not welcome in the western world. This is what has occurred.
So what’s the point of adding to the long list of western human denial syndrome, more walking bullshit?
While it’s a question whether it works or not, there are other issues. Can this technology (or other technologies) be scaled up? Can they eventually be produced without fossil fuels? Are there enough minerals on Earth to manufacture these units? Can these minerals be extracted and processed within a time frame allowing this technology to be put into use, if it can be scaled up at all? Can this shit replace the current fossil fuel-based human enterprise? Can the energy somehow be used to produce fertilizer? How are you gonna power trucks, airplanes? The answer to many if not all of the above might be a no. No matter how you slice it, even if new technologies are invented and phenomena discovered, the current makeup of the civilization is ripe for a change. One thing boggles my mind – the general mood among people frequenting these pages is that they… Read more »
Why does everything need to be scaled up first, only to come crashing down b/c you didnt grow organically slowly and safely first, you jumped into the easy industrial solution and then fall into denial when the green water pollution problem doesn’t affect you.
You are like the old capitalist rabbit who has to see quick progress while they are still alive, rather than the young commie turtle who doesn’t mind waiting to see the progress as long as their safety is assured.
You need to stop this ad hominem shit, like you are fucked up like this or that, while I’m not. Capitalism and communism – and mind you, I’ve lived under both, unlike you, which makes me an authority – are abstract concepts that matter during something like one fucking microsecond in the history of the human species, which is what we happen to be talking about, since the stuff under discussion is about biological, physical, and ecological realities, not some shit that the current few generations of idiot humans have concocted thanks to happening upon easy energy. I don’t give a whole lot of fuck about capitalism or communism or any other fucking -isms. That’s garbage for bird-brain imbeciles unable to see beyond the tip of their nose. I look far beyond the horizon. If you were able to setp back and look at the human endeavor from a distance,… Read more »
If you’re not fucked up, I’m not sure what world you are living in!
Perhaps you’re the one that needs to take a step back? You appear to be trapped in the one-dimensional political/scientific ideology which permeates society, albeit from an insightful and likely well-informed perspective.
You’re exhibiting all signs of psychological projection. I’m not the one who’s trapped in one-dimensional thinking. Most other people are, probably including you, even though I know too little about you to determine that.
Most people think in a reductionist fashion. That happens to be a major problem with human perception of the world, as science considers phenomena separately without the correlation thereof to other phenomena. The same applies to politics, to everything. We think ourselves smart, but the truth is that we do shit in a rather random manner and keep dealing with unintended consequences, that is what we fucked up by our previous actions.
Anyway, I’m probably totally fucked up, you’re right about that, at least insofar as being not-fucked up – or is it unfucked up or possibly fucked down? hmmm…. – means being a fucking normative humanoid of the general dimwit variety.
Three shitbags in a shit factory.
There is a world of difference between a brilliant person who avails himself of the entirety of the lexis and uses for rhetorical effect words your nano-brain considers dirty on the one hand, and, on the other hand, a fucking moron of your kind who is obsessed with the aforesaid words for some bizarre reason, probably because his controller has told him that some words are prohibited and he obediently complies, while pissing toxic piss at people who use language without thus imposed constraints.
Hope this kinda explains it, you fucking moron.
11/14/2011, Club of Rome Lifetime Achievement Award winner, former NJ Gov. Christie Whitman, EPA Chief under Bush #2, broke her leg while skiing during Davos meetings in 1999: 1/31/1999, “Gov. Whitman Breaks Leg Skiing,” AP, via CBSNews.com, “Gov. Christie Whitman was hospitalized Sunday after breaking a leg in a skiing accident in Switzerland, her spokesman said. Whitman was attending the World Economic Forum in Davos and was skiing in a conference-organized event in the middle of the day when she took a hard, twisting fall on an intermediate slope, spokesman Pete McDonough said.”…https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gov-whitman-breaks-leg-skiing/...In 1991, Club of Rome book, “First Global Revolution,” by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, stated on page 75: “We came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill….The real enemy then is humanity itself.”…
1/31/1999 = 33 and 666. Are you sending a message?
Apologies as I’m off-topic but this is crucial for those of us in Australia. Australia’s Digital I.D. legislation bill has been passed by the senate. It now goes before the house of reps who meet, I think, on 14 May. Please, please everyone who can, write/call/visit your federal member as tell them to vote NO against this slave-making agenda.
I know its probably useless to tell our representatives to actually represent us,but we can at least try.
How members of the aussie senate just voted …..33 ayes, 26 noes
https://substack.com/home/post/p-142924533
33 … they don’t even hide their Freemasonic shilling. Loud and proud.
Correction:
“From a list of 34 risks, the WEF report identifies information as the top threat to global” financial $cams.
These dark creatures cannot bear the light.
Since I no longer believe in the “moon landings”, I am curious to see whether I will soon no longer believe in the existence of a “nuclear bomb” either. I’m happy to be proven wrong at any time. But not by analyzing Kubrick’s Strangelove or Shining, Hollywood lies.
https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/michael-palmer-atomic
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/index.html
https://www.heiwaco.com/bomb.htm
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/about/
wow…. many people think the USA is evil… they don’t know the half of it…
About the strike on that bridge in Baltimore– this is brief & interesting:
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/mv-dalis-final-five-minutes
It’s by John Leake, who claims some expertise.
And another thing
Scotland don’t speak, or here, now, funny
This sort of rhetoric, is, forget what I was going to say
Whether there’s a climate crisis or not is irrelevant to TPTB. They promote a climate threat for one reason and one reason only: as cover should the day arrive when the whole world understands what they’re doing to the Earth’s atmosphere. That way they can say they were spraying toxins all day and all night to protect us from overheating.
When in fact they’re spraying so as to ionize the atmosphere to better enable all the 5G and related emf gadgets to somehow control everybody on Earth. It won’t happen of course; but they think it will. Insanity is like that, isn’t it?
I don’t know either, it is my ruler, my god
We need a new shit article quick I am m.issing the shitlogger Socialog of shitshowland.Where is that fuckhead .I think he must be working out a new theory in the shitter.Shit one out.Quick.
I know Mar, right !
How else are shit-brains like us meant to understand without daily distraction,
Anyway Researcher crushes nearly all here.
Massive lurkers say shit.
Edwige for me.And Gordan of course.Who is this fuckhead manure licking gobshite.
And so it goes.
How to compare Edwige to Gordan,
Lets have a heated debate.
Jaques. And many other names.
Thanks.
And Thank You,
Yes, As I mentioned earlier in the ‘chat’, I was heartened that you said ‘lol’ about Alan, he would love that !
What else, yes, excellent work carry on
Lol. He’s comedy gold; if you enjoy comedy that reeks like urine, vomit, stale cigarettes, and beer soaked carpet in a dive bar.
He got exhausted and burst into flames, is my guess.
We are systematically being genocided, at the systems-level. Climate change is just another of many fronts the jews have deployed to, like a snake, slowly choke us to death. The 2 quadrillion dollar derivative market, the unsustainable debts, outsourcing all of industry to communist countries, spic invasion here in the states, muslim invasion in EU states, jew monopolies over corporations, the criminal political system, etc. Look at the trajectory around you. It’s all a system of a down.
If your effective fighting this, welcome to zersetzung. Stasi is alive and well in the USA.
This reminds me of that Kurt Vonnegut, so it goes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hEcu0HYRQU
and slow it goes
nice to have a chance to take time, have a think
if you like ‘cringe comedy’, that’s great
Listen to a podcast, maybe Alan Partridge.
Please do not reply with Alan quotes, he would not approve of this site.
Thanks Captain,
This got me on to, here is one you must have seen.
Two of the root causes have to be our nations memberships to the Bank for International Settlements, and the United Nations.
These two memberships alone have resulted in governments becoming, by design, mere population managers for these parasites.
https://nordictimes.com/the-nordics/denmark/danish-party-leader-new-citizens-must-recognise-israel/
Like Sweden percsecuting Assange and joining NATZO, this is one more sign that Scandiwegians have crossed over to walk on the dark side. Must be their Viking blood stirring as the ice melts and they scent the prospect of fighting Russia for control of Arctic oil, gas and sea routes.
“From fire, famine and the Norsemen may the Good Lord deliver us” — Prayer from the Dark Ages.
No Sir, its not an earthquake, its the sound of battle formations that makes them cross the line into Natzo.
I am absolutely in favor of exporting 20,000 Jumbos (instead of “POCs”) to Berlin, and this directly to the grounds of the so-called Bundestag. There, the “green” Maoists can fertilize their cannabis plants with Jumbo dung instead of practicing “politics” for airheads. https://pravda-en.com/world/2024/04/02/403801.html
It has been mentioned here that the CO2 Coalition is funded by the oil industry. The MSM certainly thinks so, for what is worth. They also state that Trump donors are funding it. If anything is going to taint an organisation and herd wavering climate disciples back into the fold, it is the mention of ‘Orange Man bad’. In the theatre that passes for reality, the reality TV star is the best friend of the controllers in the world of fake binaries. Anyway enough of that; the oil companies could be funding the CO2 Coalition and if so which ones? The smaller ones because it is in their interests or the oil barons behind ‘Big Oil’ which funds the controlled opposition including Extinction Rebellion? One thing is clear though, which is that the true oligarchs of the oil industry brought the climate change agenda into the public conciousness. Starting with… Read more »
Exxon (part of the Rockefeller complex) censored a report made by its scientists in 1977 predicting that CO2 increases would cause a rise of 5 deg C in the average global temp. And funded efforts to debunk the entire idea. The oil industry was at the center of funding the debunking efforts. William O’Keefe, CEO of the CO2 Coalition, is former CEO of the American Petroleum Institute. This Coalition gets oodles of money from the Mercer Foundation and from Charles Koch, an oil billionaire. Enron money also involved, The Coalition grew out of the John C Marshall Institute, which was sponsored by Exxon.
About the 1977 Exxon study.
https://thehonestsorcerer.medium.com/climate-change-has-come-full-circle-6d737f0072cd
So what is your point Jeffrey? Do you believe CO2 increases caused by human activity are causing global climate change? And that the measures the WEF and others are proposing, such as carbon taxes, eating bugs, only the rich being able to fly, etc., are appropriate?
Lol. That “report” was an obvious hoax. The Club of Rome was founded at David Rockefeller’s estate in 1968.
There’s no such thing as fossil fuel. Oil is abiotic. It’s been proven experimentally and geologically.
Surface temps directly correspond to solar activity cycles and oceanic cycles. Not human activity.
Numerous research papers link solar cycles to earths temp.
Koch and big oil moved into carbon credits and the green energy scam years ago.
NOAA deliberately omitted temp data to get their fake temp rise.
NOAA deliberately falsified data.
96% NOAA heat measurement stations corruptly placed to support climate hoax.
Proof NASA fraudulently adjusted their data to create fake rise.
We entered a new Maunder Minimum in 2020.
From your Link:
The last time I saw a prediction “with 99% certainty” it came from prestigious Princeton mathematicians and predicted that Killary Clinton would beat Donald Trumpeter in the POTU$ race.
“It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future” — Niels Bohr, physicist.
Yeah it’s so much easier to make predictions about the past. If you can get through the forest of lies, that is.
Another supposedly alternative to the main stream news outlet discussing Climate without ever mentioning chem trails.!!
The resurrection ritual like clock work……
(isnt the hernia the same place Jesus was pierced on the cross…?)
under the guise of exit stage (cloning) for Bibi:
Netanyahu in ‘excellent’ health after hernia surgery, hospital says
bibi was in hospital over the Easter weekend!! off course he was!!!
https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/31/middleeast/netanyahu-hernia-surgery-intl/index.html
and not forgetting King cancer Charlie was out shaking hands with the subjects (resurrected on Easter Sunday Monday after hiding due to cancer!!
King Charles shake hands with the Eastern bunny?
The eclipse this April the 8th happens on 4.8.24, 40284 days since the Federal Reserve was founded.
3 the key to Tesla theory: remind us who inherited the wealth of his designs, from the basement of his Hotel ?
The ruling class are devising ways to prevent dissent.
Just remember kiddies, disinformation kills! — https://www.bcs.org/articles-opinion-and-research/disinformation-kills-now-what-are-we-going-to-do-about-it 11 Jan 2021 Disinformation kills. Now what are we going to do about it? Dr Alexi Drew, Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Policy Institute at King’s College, London advises BCS on policy and cyber security. In this opinion piece she writes that now is the time to have a grown up conversation about the sometimes destructive power of the internet. Trump’s use of social media has long been a cause for concern and the final straw came when he used it to encourage protesters in Washington, D.C., to march on Capitol Hill last week, sparking the storming of the building… But are these moves taken by the tech giants too little too late? And what about the concerns about disinformation, conspiracy theories and hate crimes that are frequently spread by social media? In this opinion piece Dr Alexi Drew, Postdoctoral Research Associate at… Read more »
Is climate change bullshit? FUCK, YES!!! FOR FUCKS SAKES, ISN’T IT OBVIOUS? How can such an undefinable thing as climate change not be a crock of shit? What is climate, what is change? That can be 1000+1 things. Get that through your thick skulls and stop fighting the GIANT STRAWMAN. It’s the same fucking thing as COVID. You’re fighting the existence or effect of the virus, the kill shot, lockdowns, fuckccine injury, all sorts of inconsequential strawmen. While what matters was the economic effect of stopping the economy from turning, pouring cash into the system, ushering in a new socio-economic era – techno-feudalism or rather techno-slavery. Meanwhile, people DO GET FUCKING SICK. CLIMATE CHANGE is the same thing, idiots. The climate is changing, which is always the fucking case. Likewise, the human enterprise does have an adverse effect on nature, what we do is toxic to the nth degree. The… Read more »
Sustainabull. You were spouting the same shite for months last year as Roserval Parkun, Kunda Sem Kunda Tam, Disgusted, Pottymouth, Zorgling etc. What’s an empty vessel do again ? 😀
So to dispense once again with the rampaging obfuscatory rhetoric,
We “denialist cretins” (interesting!), should adopt “a sensible approach to disease” – meaning the flu/ covid (which are apparently the same thing though I’m sure the severity can be changed by the rebranding).
And we are to adopt “a sustainable way of life” to cope with “the adverse impact of human activity on the natural world (CLIMATE CHANGE)”.
So….. there is no discernible difference between you and the media!
Fuckhead, the media is telling you to adopt a sensible approach to disease? What fucking media? The media is telling you to get tested, fuckccinated, lockdowned, distanced. Sensible approach is to live a healthy lifestyle and stay in fucking bed if you do get sick. Sustainable way of life means coming to terms that we’re living on a borrowed time, that our luxurious life is driven by finite resources, and working toward an existence that will allow surviving when the resources run out or become too difficult to get. The fucking media is telling you that? Don’t fucking think so! It used to be that stupid people like you were quietly sitting in the corner, listened to what their more intelligent counterparts had to say, and tried to understand. As opposed to allowing your bird brain to interpret, through the lens of the biases your fucked up head harbors, what… Read more »
Well let’s skip the covid meme since the media have gone relatively quiet on that but I daresay if they unleash that beast again we’ll be getting a lot of advice on what is “sensible”.
“Sustainable way of life means coming to terms that we’re living on a borrowed time, that our luxurious life is driven by finite resources, and working toward an existence that will allow surviving when the resources run out or become too difficult to get. The fucking media is telling you that? Don’t fucking think so!”
Well do fucking think so because that’s exactly what the media are telling us.
You should know. You got your head stuck up the media’s asshole so fucking far up that it’s sticking out their throat.
Buzz off already, dumbo. Ever considered judging things based on their merit as opposed to based on what your (fucked up) perception of the messenger is? Obviously not.
I remember fucking Sociolog by the train tracks behind the Business Park. Grippiest asshole I ever fucked. He kept looking round at me saying “you like that, faggot?”. I tried to ignore him and kept on railing away while he jackpot no-handed seminal fluid onto the tracks there, and eventually I did manage to get my nut off. As soon as I had finished he hopped off, lay flat on his back and raised his legs up over his head so that he could drink the cum leaking out his ass. “You like watching that, queer boy?” he asked me. Once he’d slurped every last drop, he sprang up and punched me as hard as he could in the face. I was fine but it looked like he broke his hand. He ran off nursing his wrist and calling me a gaylord. That was the last time I fucked Sociolog in the ass behind the Business Park.
You probably spend too much time watching sick porn. I can imagine nothing else that would make you fantasize shit like this, man/woman (select the applicable based on how you feel today).
There’s a log in your path Socio.
You can do better.
Consult your thesaurus more often.
Expletives become tedious and lose their impact with repetition.
Anyways, ;-} rants are the indicators of a neglected childhood, manifesting as attention seeking.
Just ask Todd.
He’s having trouble separating the fluff from the news, and the cost of resources verses time.
The way cognitive dissonance peppered with obdurate stupidity prevents you from focusing on the subject matter is cute.
Anyway, the text at least deals somewhat laterally deal with some aspects of actually reality. You and the other losers are only hallucinating ad hominem shite.
Be still, and know that l (the person reading these words) am god.
Forget laterally and go with REALITY.
Tovarish? 😂
These days of polycrisis propaganda, the next news cycle (rinse and repeat) is bound to bring up more doom and gloom as the greatest threat for us to fear. But maybe mis-dis-mal-information is the clincher when you count all the final solutions of the Great Reset requiring lies to become reality. Of course the Davos gang and other global crime bosses are not about to look in the mirror. The rule of the few over the many by manufactured consent keeps them too busy accusing others of what they’re doing, constantly applying false flag logic. War’s the conventional go-to when it comes to population control, uniting people into a patriotic herd against a common enemy, their counterparts on the other side, or as WW1 propagandist George Creel put it, “one white hot mass instinct” for mass murder of our own kind. So it’s no surprise that war has been declared on covid and… Read more »
The real question is why those twelve lies of Guterres are not thrown in his face as ‘disinformation’; all the scientists promoting those lies are not defrocked and prevented from working as scientists any longer; and why the climate realists aren’t prepared to embrace the concept of punishment for these grifting, lying charlatans. Punishment should be extended to politicians, to civil servants, to the media (especially the BBC), and to schoolteachers for pushing absolute climate ignorance to the next generation.
Life is totally ridiculous when misinforming liars tell the world that anyone who disagrees with them must be cancelled for ‘propagating misinformation’.
“It’s just a cover-story, that’s wot it tis !”
“It’s just Marketing, that’s wot it is !”
And you get a choice:
“Which side are you on:
Climate Denial-ism, or Climate Alarm-ism ?”
“it’s all binary -ism, that’s wot it is !”
Looks like nobody told the Sakura trees about global warming! But what would they know?
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/03/29/japan/society/cherry-blossoms-bloom-tokyo/
That is exactly a sign that something is completely wrong with nature, as they should NOT blossom at this moment!
It’s like Nestle and Coca Cola telling you what’s good for you and your health. Sounds like someone(s) never understood the definition of Science and would be seriously caught off guard if you asked them to define it for you in a pinch. Definitely would be some stumbling there. Also, how many different definitions of PPP do we have to have? Well, we have Pandemic Potential Pathogens. When Gain of Function got into the Awareness and they didn’t want people to know about the labs, they started using PPP, for Pandemic Potential Pathogens. So then, when people started looking into that, it became the Paycheck Protection Program. Boy, did that change some algorithms. So do we now have someone who wants to take the shite brown color out of the Green Party and make it green again with People Peace and Planet? Or do we have to focus on the… Read more »
Greed and ignorance corrupt almost everyone they come into contact with.
THE 20,000 year long plague.
There’s no cure.
Except Love.
I don’t disagree that there is the potential for that corruption, but I think people can rise above it. In addition to love as the only “cure”, wisdom and confront are good qualities too. Just so you know I didn’t fall for that vax “cure” b.s., and it has been a long, long, long time since I’ve trusted, or fallen for the b.s. of Big Phatma and the “regulatory agencies” . All they regulate is cash flow. And they give more death than life. However, it is a fact that they are messing around with some pretty anti-life shite in these labs, under the guise of “help”, and the cover of profit. So although I don’t want anyone crippled with fear and hysteria (except maybe the criminals pushing it on everyone else) I think it is wise to be alert. I know what Gulf War Illness came from. It wasnt… Read more »
No vaxx, no tests no s(Ch)wab, no masks.
Yes, ironic, isn’t it.
Vote, Don’t vote. Just don’t worry about it anyway. The result will be (p)re-arranged according to the Agenda.
the Donald is more fun than Stumblin’ Joe, but that’s not saying much. Operation War(p)speed, Missiles on Syria. Sucking up to Israel.
The TRUTH is significantly lacking.
For climate scam exposures look no further than retired Los Alamos scientist Tony Heller’s channel on Youtube. He uses their own past published data to show an Emperor without cloths.
Follow the money. That is what these “scientists” do, and the bureaucrats, politicians and renewable energy businesses – the IPCC and COP xx crowd.
That money is mostly government subsidies, little private money. The combination of alpha educated childless women and alpha male sharks is pretty harmfull.
Covid19 scam all over again. Same criminal agenda. Must be stopped.
1.Set up a fake NGO/think tank/ university department etc
2. Write a wish list disguised as threats to humanity/ rights/ mother earth etc
3. Campaign graft the wish list/report into suitable gov corp political party.
4.Set the narrative/fake opposition among the gen pop.
5.Pass the laws
6.Print the 💰
Etc
Jesse writes ‘through the lens of a Biblical world view’.
Really ?
Old religion V Scientific religion ? Both with ve$ted intere$t$.
C’mon, let’s get real.
Truth. Here. Now.
Thierry Meyssan has documented the Clima and CO2 con with due references to public papers prepared for any Court willing to go against Goldman Sachs and the top level in the Democratic party. https://www.voltairenet.org/article208187.html .
Summary: Climate Exchange Plc was founded by a former director of Goldman Sachs Bank and US Vice President Albert Gore.
Its statutes were drafted by a then unknown lawyer, the future president of the United States, Barack Obama [8]. In short, the fear of global warming allows a few powerful people and they alone to get rich.
The effects of CO2 on the climate are hypothetical and in any case marginal.
Co2 is 0.04% of the earth’s atmosphere and man is responsible for 3% of the 0.04%
Climate change: see disinformation.
but I guess the 51 trillion that they want to rob from us to change these absurd numbers are “worth” it, don’t you agree?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aVw5I7EJAo&ab_channel=TonyHeller
Dennis Meadows (Club of Rome). If this is what they openly say in an interview for the public domain, imagine what gets discussed behind closed doors, at “The Club”…
The best thing about that video is the comments.
“Once you realize that YOU are the carbon they want to eliminate, it all makes sense.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coh52TUZcZM&ab_channel=TonyHeller
Now one could say “How do you know this data is not fudged”. The short answer is we don’t, but until we are able to have adult debates then we can’t conclude. One thing is for sure, when authorities are jamming it down your throat and name calling/censoring if you challenge it, one can be certain it’s a scam for control and wealth for them.
And so here in Scotland, the weather never changes, 250 rainy days a year, dreich Summers and maybe a little warmer winters. Never mind our Government warms the cockles of our hearts. We brave libertarians that we are, opening our doors to all our fellow men and women no matter from where, colour, creed, or religion. We treated them as equals and promoted them to the highest offices in the land, even though the counties from which they or their forefathers hailed were and are corrupt to the core. But then we view all that from our esteemed British Values doctrine. Not that the British establishment has any values. Our forefathers fought and died, as they thought for freedom against people just like ourselves. Not realising the real enemy was sitting in their counting houses in the City or in Wall Street or that protected enclave for the BIS in… Read more »
maybe add the 1949 mission statement of the WHO to your list pure communism
Continuing the pattern on this page of presenting stuff sponsored by the oil industry as if it were objective science. The CO2 coalition is the continuation of the George C Marshall Institute, a think tank focusing on defense and climate issues which closed in 2015. William O’Keefe, a chief executive officer of the Marshall Institute and former CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, continued as CEO of the CO2 Coalition. The CO2 Coalition gets funding from the likes of the Charles Koch Foundation (Koch is an oil industry billionaire) and the William Mercer Foundation. And you present this as if a lie. “Natural gas is a fossil fuel, not a clean source of energy.” Have you any proof that it is NOT a fossil fuel? Regarding human fingerprints on the warming, CO2 resulting from human emissions has a different ratio of heavy to light atoms than natural sources. Sorry, game over. And to… Read more »
From opening quote of their Reich above: “…that misinformation and disinformation are currently the greatest threats to humanity.”
They should know. But then they are chronic science-deniers.
So they are no longer talking about viruses and global biosecurity because…?
Women’s rights will be promoted next in a new campaign as this is the real problem in this world.
Men who have suppressed women in 1000 years and exploited vulnerable children as their servants. Sitting on their fat wallet without giving anything to the global communist community.
One does not deny that the climate has changed during the brief span of time since scientific measurement and analysis have produced data. While a pattern of changing climate over geological time is an legitimate observation, one does not deny that human activity has had some effect on the changing climate. But it’s absurd to assign blame to individual behavior and burps and farts. If human activity has caused measurable climate change, it is due to industrial production, shameful lack of environmental stewardship, and waste due to planned obsolescence in manufacturing. I am not responsible for those things. Where is the drive to address the real problems in the manufacturing sector? For the entitled WEF jerks to lay blame on the shoulders of individuals is ridiculous and should not be tolerated.
I deny that human activity has had some effect on the changing climate.
“One does not deny that human activity has had some effect on the changing climate”.
This one does.
Two.
Can they bring climate change into Easter eggs? Easy-peasy:
https://theconversation.com/how-the-biggest-chocolate-makers-and-sellers-in-the-uk-fare-on-sustainability-226848?utm_source=pocket-newtab-en-gb
As for the toxic garbage that people might eat in these products, it’s hardly worth mentioning – so they don’t. “Is it good for me?” is of course the wrong question, “is it good for the planet?” is the question they want asked.
US Capitalist (accumulation of excess capital to a few to empower them to accumulate more) civilization, a pyramid scheme culture, in it’s dying epoch deploys Disaster Capitalism in the attempt to keep the conflict & war operating system master over it’s bottom 95% serf classes. Crises upon crises to hide root problems and propose evermore eviscerating-for-serfs “solutions”. All of the solutions at this stage are martial law LOCKDOWNs. Quarantine assembly. Censorship of speech. Then AI termination of access to any and everything by remote control. The open air prison of Gaza and the prison camp detention reservations of Indigenous America is the model and target. The defacto version is remote control LOCKDOWN, where the prisoners also perform as prison guards against themselves. As long as human beings can’t see this Matrix Room Full of Mirrors, this FAKE No Exit ideology they’ve caged us in, Humanity will continue to sink itself.… Read more »
A good article. What a pity the author doesn’t seem to be able to join the dots to the ‘covid’ scam i.e. no vaccine is necessary for anything, let alone one that ‘prevents transmission’. Transmission of what?
Transmission of
-. deliberately untreated critical illnesses
-. fake test positives.
I’d like to call this text something other than a giant pile of manure, alas that’s not an option. Let’s unpack this climate change issue. The following aspects are at play: 1) At the bottom of everything is the natural world. 2) On top of that we have the human enterprise. 3) Then there is the actual physical relationship between the two, how humans interact with the rest of the natural world. 4) Another factor are experts who examine 2) and 3), perform all sorts of measurements, analyses, stuff like that. 5) We also have the powers that be and various associated assholes who use findings obtained through 4) in various ways, mostly to their advantage and to the advantage of even bigger assholes we don’t even know who these fucks are. Not all of what these pricks are pushing is necessarily false or even nefarious. 6) Then there are… Read more »
I had my suspicions but there it is. When all the expletives and the wrath and the posturing fireworks clear, buried away in the middle of this seemingly radical effusion is a little glimmer of what you really want to say (and note the coy double negative!) …. and it looks a lot like what the media are pushing.
The problem with misanthropy: you end up exactly like Bill Gates. Only without the money.
(Unless of course you are Bill gates!)
(Or perhaps Al Gore. “Inconvenient truth”?)
Ignatius Jacques Reilly I think.Shithead.
Yup. A typical “if you can’t dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with your bullshit” thing. Ain’t working too well here.
Too funny …
If only you understood how you’re being led by your nose. Round and round and round, in circles. Regurgitating the same pile of manure, while being patted on your back how shrewd you are, how you can see through things.
You can see through shit.
You can fuck off, my only regret is I can’t say it to your face.
You’re probably an idiot.
The purpose of a discussion forum is to have a discussion, to exchange ideas, to argue about them. The advantage of an online forum is that it allows doing it in a no-holds barred fashion, you don’t have to worry too much about societal conventions. You can pull no punches.
Imbecile, King Fucking Charles claims that jumping off a cliff or the nearest bridge is good for your health. Act accordingly and toss your useless self down.
Pricks fucks assholes manure shitheads.
What do you call a man with manure on his head ?
Pat
Or cowshithead
Thanks for your courage. This page and the large majority of those hanging out here are in total denial, and equate the presentation of climate facts to being a sales pitch for elite globalist planning.
Do your experts talk about the influence of solar activity on earth’s climate?
Or about the fluctuations of earth’s climate over the millennia (i.e. before industrialisation)?
What do you say to the people voicing their dissent in these videos and, yes, also discussing some of the nefariousness of the warming climate agenda?
The Great Global Warming Swindle 2007 Documentary
https://youtu.be/oYhCQv5tNsQ (Aired on BBC TV on 8th March 2007)
and more recently:
“CLIMATE” : THE MOVIE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vNB13YX0X2fr/
.
The admins have refused to let me post a critique of this piece, as i pointed out the the CO2 Institute, which is presented in it as some soft of science body, is in fact funded by…. the oil industry.
Climate change is one of a long line of distraction fallacies foisted on the populace to fight over ad infinitum.
Climate change is NOT REAL because it’s a nondescript undefinable term. The issues obfuscated by climate change are real alright.
The problem is that the dunning-kruger idiots out there reject everything in its entirety. They forever whine that everything is bullshit, the elites are after them, want to replace them with lab-grown androids.
Just about nobody endeavors to think about the issues in a holistic manner, without the knee-jerk reaction that if the elites say so, it’s bullshit.
I wonder how many people have seen Michaux’s calculations, read Reese’s analysis, etc. Zero.
“Climate change” is not the way Michaux, Reese,… term the situation, they describe it more as human driven climate chaos, drastic warming,….. And the people who yell out that this is all elite lies don’t explain why the oil industry, run by the elite, is funding groups which deny global warming, like the CO2 Institute, which this article relies upon.
Exactly. Climate change is strawman.
I think both of you are missing the point. It’s what the “elites” are using it (climate change, global warming, global cooling or whatever suits their agenda) for, not that people believe humans have no role in the environment. Of course the oil industries would be involved in denying global warming, it’s in their interest to keep selling oil, the so called elites play a broad game. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t a giant scam being pulled off for nefarious purposes.
But I’m sure you know that already.
What matters first and foremost are the physical realities. The actual reality of what’s going on. How it’s interpreted and how it’s misused for nefarious purposes is secondary. The physical reality is what shapes how things can and will turn out and needs to be considered first as a basis for dealing, one way or another, with whatever shit is foisted on you. You can reject the shit, but you can’t get away from the underlying physical stuff, which is most people are engaged in – well most of the deniers, opponents. They reject the elite’s games and the physical issues at the same time. In their entirety. The point is that not only the physical issues do exist, at least to some extent, but there are other related issues that get rejected as well. Well-meaning people should engage in a debate about the human enterprise, industrialization, sustainability, and by… Read more »
Well-said, Meanwhile, the admins are still blocking my comments on this one particular article. They don’t like this reference to a study by Exxon scientists in 1977 which the company censored and then funded efforts to “debunk” global warming.
https://thehonestsorcerer.medium.com/climate-change-has-come-full-circle-6d737f0072cd
Are we??
Well, then go do it, man. Seriously, what are you doing here? You should know by now this isn’t the place to do that, it ain’t gonna change. So you’re just wasting your “fingers” and time. This place simply follows the bouncing red ball, are you old enough to get that? But whatever floats your boat maestro.
Just punctuating the dreariness of everyday life …
Cant you leftists find a new theme?
This campaign theme is worn out, obsolete, old fashioned and from the 1960’es.
Your reference to leftists indicates that you’re anachronistically stuck in the past, the left-right dichotomy of the previous socialist vs. capitalist era. The world has moved on. We’re now in the early stages of techno-feudalism, which will eventually progress toward techno-slavery. Even though the scarcity of energy and resources might change that by removing the techno.
There are three major issues for the upcoming period.
How to deal with the physical reality of the postindustrial world, what sort of socioeconomic system to put in place, and what general ideology/world view people should adopt to replace the current consumerism-gluttonism.
It was Jeffrey who wrote it. “the CO2 Institute, is in fact funded by…. the oil industry.”
You are right, it is stuck in the past, but your responds in wrong address, should be to Jeffrey.
I agree with your points, except with the scarcity bit. Scarcity is deliberately enforced by those nefarious lackeys for whoever lurks behind them. What’s going on in Europe at the moment is a case in point, especially energy-wise.
To this extent, the nefarious group does not come secondarily to the physical parameters. Remove this group and those who control it, and there won’t be scarcity, war and misery.
Scarcity is also deliberately imposed by suppressing research into alternatives – alternative medicine, alternative energy generation, etc., both of which need not even be “discovered”, as they have long since been suppressed.
Remove all the overlaying bullshit, and the underlying physical reality is that the world is running on energy accumulated over millennia, fossil fuels. That’s what keeps the wheels turning. The stuff will eventually run out, and calculations show that we’ve reached the peak rate of extraction. From now, the stuff will be harder (more expensive – in the physical sense, not in terms of money, which is abstract bullshit) to get, which goes directly opposite to what we need – we need more energy. If we’re to follow the heretofore followed trajectory of growth, that is. That’s the number one predicament. That’s where absolute scarcity comes into play. What you refer to is relative scarcity, the fact that some motherfuckers usurp a bigger piece of the pie because they’re bigger assholes than others. That, unfortunately, is always the case. You can’t rid the world of assholes. Also, note that everything… Read more »
The only place there is a limited and scarce resource is in your brain and your own bowl of red porridge with a piece of cream on.
Nature is not a zero sum.
Look at your apple tree. Doesnt it make more and more apples every year? Planting new apple trees beside itself if you allow it.
You plant one potato, 5 month later you got 10 out of one.
How can you and your like be so stupid to think Mother Nature is a zero sum of a limited red porridge resource in a bowl?
Energy is available in abundance! Look to lost / genocided cultures, for instance who derived energy from the aether. Also, oil is said by some scientists (also suppressed) to be abiotic and replenishable. Then there are a number of modern energy-generating technologies that would free humanity from those who want us to live lives in scarcity. I don’t buy the scarcity myth; there’s enough to go around if permitted.
Example:
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/print/Peak%20Oil.htm
blob:https://off-guardian.org/a9741450-8419-48ee-b4cc-dc6c1b04ce80
Confessions of an ‘ex’ Peak Oil believer
By F. William Engdahl, 14 September, 2007
Do riddle me, you tart. If we have reached the peak rate of extraction of ‘fossil fuels’ ( a loathable term )…
Then how the fuk are we producing more barrels per day than
EVER ?
Yep, PEAK OIL was always a question of marketing and even you have fallen for the 1894 Geneva Syndrome, sucker !
For analyses of so-called peak oil, consult for instance the following:
https://energyskeptic.com/2024/failing-oil-and-gas-companies-a-sign-of-peak-oil/
https://www.artberman.com/blog/peak-oil-is-dead-long-live-peak-oil/
Peak oil is a red herring or strawman, inconsequential issue, fallacious the way it was originally formulated. Your idiot self is fighting the strawman, instead of trying to understand reality.
Yes, we live in a finite space, with finite resources, finite supplies of energy. Your denial has nothing to do with nothing. Neither does the Dunning-Kruger effect of your utter stupidity.
It’s all one group. One cartel. There are no sovereign nations. Nor independent industries. People are so conditioned to compartmentalize everything from their indoctrination/education and misinformation/propaganda in the media they can’t join any dots. Of course BIG OIL, COAL, GAS and “governments” and GREEN ENERGY are in cahoots: It’s one cartel, managed through thousands of arms length corporations. What do you think happens when carbon taxes kick in? The price of ALL ENERGY goes up. Exponentially. It continues to rise until nobody besides cartel members and their chosen acolytes can afford to heat or cool their homes, drive a car or boil an egg. Have you read Behind the Green Mask? Or Our Common Future? Because the UN will eradicate private property, land rights, air conditioning, appliances, suburbs, gardens, pastures, meat eating, golfing/skiing/fishing, vacations, commercial jets, roads, concrete, dams, private vehicles, legal system (replaced with technocratic-fascism run on AI) consumerism… Read more »
The question is whether you regurgitate this paranoid shit as predictive programming in the employ of the aforementioned assholes or whether you do it out of paranoid stupidity and inability to anything else. Fuck this endless pointing of finger at who’s done this or that, who’s responsible, who’s to blame, who’s after you. Nothing will be accomplished that way. As much as you might not like the ‘solutions’ you’re mentioning, it is a fact that the industrial age is not sustainable and will mutate into something different. That’s a physical reality, whether you like it or not. If you wanna do something useful, offer people something they can do. Other than whine about Fuckerberg’s bunker. BTW, bunkers will save nobody because once the fucks hiding in them come out, if they ever do, their zombified selves will be completely unable to deal with the reality that will have established itself… Read more »