37

WATCH: How to REALLY Resist Digital ID – #SolutionsWatch

Editor

Today James talks to Gabriel of the Libre Solutions Network about how to really resist the encroaching digital ID grid.

As opposed to the posturing and platitudes of the online virtue signalers, James and Gabriel discuss the community-based solutions posited in Gabriel’s article, “‘Internet Badasses’ aren’t going to stop Digital ID,” including:

  • Re-integrating yourself into your local community, getting to know your neighbors
  • Using cash & local currencies
  • Building support groups
  • Supporting and expanding independent local businesses
  • Understanding that Digital ID is a system not an implementation. There are both public and private sources of Digital ID, consider them both; and
  • Caring about results
    • Do you know how dependent your local economy is on government & BlackRock?
    • Do you know how many people have already opt-ed in with or without knowing?
Sources, shownotes and links – as well as audio versions and download options – can be found here. Previous episodes of #SolutionsWatch can be found here and here.
Follow us on Telegram for regular updates & commentary

SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN

If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Categories: latest, video
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8000


37 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Larsen
Tom Larsen
Feb 11, 2025 12:38 AM

RE: “collectivism”
A family is a collective, a community is a collective and a nation is a collective.

The “left” has put forth the idea that they represent the best interests of the collective – trust them! Obviously, that’s a fraud. The “right” on the other has been attempting to demonize the term – “it’s communism!” They don’t want people to organize to “resist” or fight for their interests. (Funny, Big Business doesn’t have that problem!)

As an individual, there very little that one can do to resist these technological juggernauts that makes much difference. We have to join together, in collective effort. What happened with the Covid con was not communism, it was all promulgated by capitalist oligarchs and this sort of thing was going on long before Covid.

Baldmichael Theresolute
Baldmichael Theresolute
Feb 12, 2025 7:24 PM
Reply to  Tom Larsen

Excellent comment.

Lynn Ertell
Lynn Ertell
Feb 16, 2025 3:08 PM
Reply to  Tom Larsen

“Communitarian law” would be the term to use. So called “intentional communities” where the collective imposes its will on the individual irrespective of constitutions, “common law” or “civil law”, It’s ad hoc governance by mob rule. The vax mandates, lockdowns, forced masking and social distancing were profoundly communitarian. Together with technocracy, it’s the wave of the future.

Tom Larsen
Tom Larsen
Feb 16, 2025 5:31 PM
Reply to  Lynn Ertell

RE: “Communitarian law”

No, it’s not.This is another example of the intentional manipulation of the meaning of a word.

[C]ommunis, which means “common, public, shared by all or many.” Communis comes from a combination of the Latin prefix com- (which means “together”) and the word munis (which has to do with performing services).”

RE: “The vax mandates, lockdowns, forced masking and social distancing were profoundly communitarian. Together with technocracy…”

I would argue that communitarian would mean emanating from the community. All these things you mention were top-down state/corporate driven policies – the direct opposite, that is, authoritarian.

The words you indicate have been used to sell a credulous left policies they would not have agreed to 50 years ago. (The left used to be anti-war, anti-censorship, anti-state intervention in bodily autonomy as well as suspicious of Big Business and government – today they are the opposite.) They have become for the state/corporate nexus, useful idiots. Just because the left has been the subjects of intelligence service psy-op manipulation and social engineering (for decades!) does not mean that the right has been left alone. The inversion of the meaning of these ancient words is an example.

sandy
sandy
Feb 10, 2025 6:56 PM

We are already leashed and people put their dog collars on voluntarily everyday if the use a smart phone for anything other than a job. If they use “the” cloud for anything. If they use a credit card. If they “autopay” anything. If they allow someone else to sell them “convenience”, there’s a price paid to the “convienencer” and it is your soul. As we are finding, and have been finding since industrialization, is technology, innovations that make humans superhuman, has a deep price not apparent at first.

2025 humanity faces natural system limits that the owner class has realized is not submitting to their attempts to force their innovations upon nature or humans. They apparently see totalitarianism, on the 99%, as their only way forward. In every facet of reality. And these efforts are failing dramatically. Our best way forward, is to indeed resist every one of their gimmicks and return to physical reality solutions we know works. Convenience will the end of all of us if we do not discriminate for best long term results for humanity.

judith
judith
Feb 10, 2025 12:43 PM

Hi Admin

I earlier wrote a response to Penelope’s comment.

I attached a link to a Shannon Joy video. I wanted to link another episode but my comment went to PENDING too quickly.

I just came back to attach the link and my comment is not even in pending. It’s gone.

What?

My comments are completely innocuous so why has it disappeared?

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Feb 10, 2025 2:44 PM
Reply to  judith

Dunno, no deliberate reason. As if we’d ever be that mean hehe. I’ll take a look. A2

judith
judith
Feb 10, 2025 4:23 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Well, there it is back from limbo.

I wonder if it had to do with the Shannon Joy link?

Oh well…..

Thanks for checking.

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Feb 10, 2025 4:41 PM
Reply to  judith

I think it was there all along, I could find nothing in spam or trash. A2

les online
les online
Feb 10, 2025 8:56 AM

The history of History is that people always submit.
Without their submission there can be no tyranny…
(‘Tyranny’ Is NOT mis-management)…

Penelope
Penelope
Feb 10, 2025 3:52 AM

I just saw a really effective propaganda video. Look & tell me what’s wrong with the interpretation being given us:
https://www.malone.news/p/deep-state-deconstruction-doge-and

judith
judith
Feb 10, 2025 12:11 PM
Reply to  Penelope

I watched two very interesting interview videos yesterday.

The Shannon Joy show. She interviewed Debra Lehrman and Sasha Latypova about their Covid Dossier. They go behind the curtain of Fauci as the big bad man, and unveil the people he answers to. I tend to agree with them that covid, for all it’s reasons, was a military operation.

Joy alos did a recent interviewing Catherine Austin Fitts and Patrick Wood about the DOGE/Treasury Dept/USAID debacle involving Elon Musk.

I happen to agree with Fitts. I think it is despicable that Elon Musk and his cohorts are given access to information that normally would only be available with top secret clearance under the caveat that they are “cleaning up” the govt waste.

I also agree with her that all this jumping for joy at the illusion that Trump and his technocratic minions really clearing the swamp this time – get my smelling salts, it’s happening! – is just beyond insane.

If I cannot link them properly, and you are interested, just search Shannon Joy show.

https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1lPJqMEEwQeJb

judith
judith
Feb 10, 2025 4:26 PM
Reply to  judith

Here’s the Catherine Austin Fitts interview.

https://x.com/ShannonJoyRadio/status/1886437282585960734


Johnny
Johnny
Feb 11, 2025 8:30 AM
Reply to  judith

Not sure about Shannon.

•Glamorous, which is typically
Usian and a tad overdone.

• Flogging investments in metals. (Her husband’s business?).

• Heart on her sleeve Christian

Otherwise, the interview with the two Dossier women was very interesting and informative.

Is Shannon chasing fame and glory or am l just getting old and cynical?

judith
judith
Feb 11, 2025 12:49 PM
Reply to  Johnny

I had/have the same thoughts. Although what’s wrong with looking your best and producing a good, professional looking/sounding product?

As for sponsorship, why not? I don’t have to watch the ads, and I certainly do not have to purchase anything.

If podcasters are willing to devote the time and energy into producing good, quality content (which costs money) why shouldn’t they earn a living from it?

Some podcasters and substackers do not want to sponsor companies, but then most of them are left with asking for donations and subscriptions.

Either way, most of the alternative media are trying to make a living.

At this point, I take the best and leave the rest.
If some of these folk are “controlled op”, I am still learning something.

As for wearing Jesus on her sleeve, yeah, a number of them do. I just let that stuff pass. I like Fitts’ way of handling that. If she is telling a story that pertains to her spirituality she will mention that she is a Christian, but she does not wear it on her sleeve.

Johnny
Johnny
Feb 11, 2025 11:21 PM
Reply to  judith

Good points Judith.
I’ll try to curb my cynicism.
Thank you,

judith
judith
Feb 10, 2025 12:45 PM
Reply to  Penelope

Thanks. I watched it.

I responded with a link to a Shannon Joy interview with Catherine Austin Fitts and Patric Wood, but my comment went to PENDING. Now it’s gone.

Erik Nielsen.
Erik Nielsen.
Feb 10, 2025 2:35 PM
Reply to  Penelope

If we keep to facts we are not far from the right road.

Fact is USAID had a bad reputation for decades all over the world with Gender Change Programmes in Colombia, billions poured down in black holes, and so on.
What is common in these West Aid to the Third world programmes is a 40% of the AID budget spent to actual Aid in the country being good cases.

The rest and mostly more were/are usually used to 5 star hotels, 1’st class air-tickets, tax free salaries, 4WD vehicles, corrupting and building up de-stabilisation and regime change networks.

So, Trump promised to take out the swamp/deep state, and Musk had to tools to do it.

It happens often when a new government take place that they dont want the bad heritage from the outgoing team, and therefore use the first 1/2 year to clean up the worst mud from the foregoing.
Then the lead heavy bureaucracy hits the fan and the new government fall back and adapt to the deep state again. This time their own. You see?

Armistice - another time
Armistice - another time
Feb 10, 2025 2:55 AM

“The Freedom, Sancho, is to have full digital identification, which, for your most enjoyable experience, you can provide on demand from every beautiful corner of the place where all of us humans exist – on the Internet.”
A young man told me this, and also that I was stupid and old and he had no idea what nonsense I was talking about.

Erik Nielsen.
Erik Nielsen.
Feb 10, 2025 2:43 PM

This young man will never know the beauty and satisfaction of being spiritually aligned with nature.comment image

Armistice - another time
Armistice - another time
Feb 10, 2025 2:14 AM

I have a comment that is in “pending” – blessings, thousands of blessings and good wishes for the beneficial work of the moderators – under a neighboring article, but appropriate for here, to express my opinion on the problem cardinally, I will try to see if I will be more lucky here:

“…And then we come to the question: what we designate as the broad NWO plan is a long-term plan.

We are now in the process of a long transition, which, in time, in 30, or 50, or more years, should lead to the full (or approximately planned) realization of the new world. Who is this world for then? For today’s younger people, for teenagers, above all for children and especially for the unborn, who will be born in the more advanced stages of building this new world, and especially for those who will be born in the new world already built.

Then look at the young people, for example, around the 30-year-olds, look at the 20-year-olds, look at the 15-year-olds and the 10-year-olds, then look at the 5-year-olds. The facts are unshakable:

A person has a nose, ears, eyes and a smartphone.

There is no person without a smartphone. There may have been – the funny old people seem to have been born and lived in such a primitive world, but it is not certain, the younger ones have not seen it firsthand – but it is no longer and in the future there will not be. A person without a smartphone is like being blind or crippled.

What, then, is the future of humanity?
What does it mean for young technophiles, especially teenagers and especially children, your anxiety and mistrust about digitalization and your struggle to preserve from the coming evil digital identification?

“What, so with fewer credentials my apps will work worse, my access to websites and social networks may be difficult or even impossible, part of my purchases will have to be made manually, imagine – MANUALLY, as a primitive person, given that I have this quick and easy option. It’s like the end of the world and not just an end, but a voluntary one under the pretext of some incomprehensible, completely imaginary “preservation of personal freedom” and other blah blah that are in no way part of my world and my mind, that do not exist outside of connection to the Internet. This is the voluntary end of what my life is, for some incomprehensible reason that is not mine!”

Absurdity. There is no such struggle. There is a temporary, in this short transition period, for those old people who will not be part of the future that is for the young. A smartphone, a computer, or any device that connects the souls of the blessed to their natural soul-dwelling is part of the physical, biological, energetic, mental, and whatever essence of the human being. It may not have been, but it is already and it will not just stay that way, but this is only the beginning – it will develop much more.

Mass embedding of devices in the body and brain? Biodigital convergence? Sure.

From the moment “biocompatibility, battery charging and safety issues are resolved” (as the narrative goes), and this gains traction through our favorite media, and some new features that increase human capabilities are shown, an extraordinary new way of communicating is shown not only through words, looking, touching between people, but also through “direct exchange of thoughts”, even of feelings (people will “really understand their feelings”, they will “feel” them), and so on satanic possibilities – consider the broadest biodigital convergence as a fact of life in the future, completely voluntary and with the greatest desire (in fact, the greatest punishment for the future person will be to be deprived of the opportunity to be microchipped; and the few remaining reasonable conservative parents who forbid their children to be microchipped, will be hated by them and after the children reach the required age – they will microchipped themselvs; it will be exactly the same as today’s young man, teenager, a child to be deprived of his smartphone, namely – the end of his normal life and world, The Horror..).

“I think that the attitude towards the technology itself will change radically in the next 10 years. Generations will be renewed, for new ones the Internet is not a miracle, and smartwatches are not a gadget. All this is already part of their lives, like a shirt. It doesn’t matter if it’s embedded in the body or in clothes. Let’s look at the history of mankind, it has always experimented. It is difficult to say how inevitable the cyborgization of man is, but his merging with technology is indeed inevitable.”

– 2021, Alexander Chulok, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Director of the HSE [Higher School of Economics, Moscow] Center for Scientific and Technological Forecasting

Only because he is a very busy person, he is distracted and “forgets” to say that he is part of those who change the attitude towards technology.

Erik Nielsen.
Erik Nielsen.
Feb 10, 2025 3:32 PM

“That man is merging with technology is inevitable.”

To tell the truth I dont like these idiots trying to persuade people that their bs is “inevitable”. Allow me to make a few examples;

UK Column News – 12th July 2024 | UKColumn Google Founder Hassibis: “AI is at cat intelligence level, but in a few years with more date…..”, min 53:41.

Obama’s weekly AI Drone kill terrorist list. 9 out of 10 were innocent, only 1 were “terrorist”, “…but with more data then in a few years………..”.

Weather prediction 2024 about storm and wind direction around Baleares Island went wrong, and a lot of Sail Yachts “who believed in the data” went down to the bottom of the Sea, no casualties, but with more data gathering then in a few years…………

It is INEVITABLE for YOU with a binary brain, but not for INEVITABLE for people with a human brain. Get it, and get lost!

Armistice - another time
Armistice - another time
Feb 11, 2025 2:11 AM
Reply to  Erik Nielsen.

Although I see something else in the people who are the future, I fervently hope that you are right, not me.

Lily
Lily
Feb 11, 2025 8:58 PM

I totally agree with everything you have said. I am technically from the ‘millennials’ stage when the internet and smart phones first came to be on a large scale. As a teacher, I can see the destruction first hand being done to the young minds of children. Their social skills are delayed, they struggle with normal social interactions now and their imagination skills are almost non- existent. Writing tasks are almost impossible as children are unable to picture places they haven’t ’seen’ or experienced. It’s very sad. I am hopeful however that many are recognising the destruction and are turning away from technology.

Armistice - another time
Armistice - another time
Feb 12, 2025 7:38 PM
Reply to  Lily

Thank you, Lily, for confirming, with first-hand observations as a teacher, the disturbing reality that you and I both see and dislike. There is no need to turn our heads away from reality and rosy the realistic forecast for possible development – it is not good. Apart from this, everyone can feel this more or less disturbing, and harbor corresponding hopes. I, without worrying, because I cannot do anything, have no illusions about development, and therefore have no hopes of a turnaround, for which I see no indication, but this is only me, and perhaps I do not fully understand the depth of the capabilities of human beings, and do not take into account “other factors” beyond human ones that could affect development, as I suppose our Scandinavian friend and Christian, Erik, means.

mgeo
mgeo
Feb 12, 2025 6:59 AM

What does it mean for young technophiles
Early cancer.

parents who forbid their children to be microchipped
In “advanced” countries, neither parent can stop the government from mutilating a child chemically and surgically. A chip is a small matter.

Armistice - another time
Armistice - another time
Feb 12, 2025 8:15 PM
Reply to  mgeo

“In “advanced” countries, neither parent can stop the government from mutilating a child chemically and surgically. A chip is a small matter.”

But, here, dear mgeo, that is why the People raised your voice of resistance and elected the President Anti-Spread of Transgenderism was installed, who has already begun to issue the necessary decrees for deterrence and prohibition. Some people, maybe crypto-leftist, spew snakes and lizards that “the whole rise of Walke-leftist-surgical-surgical and chemical mutilation has been artificially created, accelerated and brought out to ring day and night in the right-wing media, but it is not meant to reign and abide in eternity, but to serve as an Ultimate Threat to frighten, harden the ranks and unite the target group (conservative people) behind the Savior, The president of the Vaccines, who already, with the group of technocrats-transhumanists, to introduce the really conceived plan, which is conservative-technocratic-transhumanist.”

People have nothing else to do and talk all sorts of things.

Against this backdrop of the immediate extreme threats of chemical and surgical mutilation, diversity and wockeyism, the chip is really a small matter. It sounds ominous.

Johnny
Johnny
Feb 9, 2025 11:55 PM

Give em the digit:

comment image

Erik Nielsen
Erik Nielsen
Feb 9, 2025 9:14 PM

The good ol’ 68 solution: Marihuana pipes, buy local herbs, coming together in collective communities, use cash on Fridays as per Solari Report, and finally spent all your afternoon walking up and down the front of Nato Head quaters and Government buildings with a poster saying “Make Love, Not war”.

I wish you guys all the best. Bob Dylan https://youtu.be/YoagldK69U0 .

ariel
ariel
Feb 10, 2025 4:39 PM
Reply to  Erik Nielsen

‘Brings it all back,’ (home)

les online
les online
Feb 9, 2025 8:16 PM

Simon AI says:
“Dear Useless Eater,
you have been Scientifically selected* for deletion.
Present yourself in person at your nearest Garbage Disposal site.
… (Signed) AI.

If you support Trump’s attack dogs going after the US Education
Department next, you most likely support the idea of kids being
‘home-schooled’ by computer programs – the perfect solution: No
more schools, no more Ed bureaucrazy, no more teachers filling
kids heads with left-wing propaganda and gender confusion. And
will be pleased the kids will be surveilled 24/7, graded, and
subjected to behaviour ‘moulding’ (kept busy) so their idle hands
dont do evil for The Devil.
(And you probably favour Elon & his Big Tech Frenz making billions
selling / installing the AI surveillence (aka – ‘teaching’) machines** in
millions of homes… It’s Win-Win for The Big Techies !!)

** By Me, a brilliant AI and my brilliant algorithms…
*** (aka – telescreens)…

red lester
red lester
Feb 9, 2025 9:14 PM
Reply to  les online

Try this:

Johnny
Johnny
Feb 9, 2025 11:05 PM
Reply to  red lester

Life? No.
He’s confused Life with living.

Life has no end and no beginning.
Can you remember when you weren’t?

The state of Death is unverifiable until one is dead.
Then we are simply Being.

les online
les online
Feb 10, 2025 12:27 AM
Reply to  red lester

“Wont happen !”

Jonathan
Jonathan
Feb 10, 2025 1:20 AM
Reply to  red lester

LOL. Even Tom Scott has been radicalised since I last watched him.

Sandra Locke
Sandra Locke
Feb 11, 2025 3:13 AM
Reply to  red lester

You may believe differently, but I do not believe that you can upload brains (or “consciousness”). Not in 50 years, and not in 1000 years.

Moreover, even if you could upload the contents of your brain, it wouldn’t be you. It would just be data.

Why are they trying so hard to convince us that this is the next big thing?

judith
judith
Feb 11, 2025 12:51 PM
Reply to  Sandra Locke

I’m sure if they uploaded the content of my brain they would shove it right back in.