The Deep State Revelations CERCLE
Iain Davis
People like Dominic Cummings, chief advisor to former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, have a habit of revealing things we’re not supposed to know about how government operates. They often expose the motives and acts of what many these days call the deep state.
One of the most reasonable definitions of the “deep state” was offered by US defence analyst-turned-writer Mike Lofgren in his 2014 essay “Anatomy of the Deep State“:
[T]here is another government concealed behind the one that is visible[.] [It is] a hybrid entity of public and private institutions ruling the country according to consistent patterns in season and out.
The oft-inconvenient comments about that deep state, when uttered by the likes of Cummings, either go unreported by the legacy media or the disclosures are spun to misdirect public attention.
That’s because the job of the legacy media and its newer iteration, the Mainstream Alternative Media (MAM), is to maintain the public’s faith in the Establishment and its state—not to prompt us to question it.
Let’s consider the revealing remarks Dominic Cummings made in December 2024 (we’ll insert the names of the current incumbents):
So if you think of two roles, right, the Foreign Secretary [David Lammy] of Great Britain and the private secretary in the PM’s office responsible for foreign affairs [Ailsa Terry], an official whose name has never been in the newspapers, that person [Terry] was, like, ten times more powerful and important than the [foreign] secretary of state [Lammy]. This is something which, I think, people just don’t really realise. [. . .] It’s part of how the whole system has become fake. So, you have fake meritocracy, fake responsibility, and then fake cabinet government. [. . .] [I]t’s all nonsense. The cabinet is just like a staged theatre.
It may come as a relief to many that David Lammy is more window dressing than decision-maker. But that fact does prompt us to ask why, if unelected bureaucrats are running everything behind the scenes, we bother to engage in the political charade at all. Moreover, whom do the bureaucrats serve? And how do we challenge the power of those who really exercise it if they are not the politicians we elect to represent us?
Cummings’ December 2024 comments were not the first politically uncomfortable observations he has voiced in public. I previously reported that during a 2021 Parliamentary Committee hearing Cummings confessed [scroll to 14:02:35]:
In March [2020] I started getting calls from various people saying these new mRNA vaccines could well smash the conventional wisdom. [. . .] What Bill Gates and people like that were saying to me and [to] others in Number 10 was you need to think of this much more like the classic programs of the past [. . .] — the Manhattan Project in WWII, the Apollo program. [. . .] That’s essentially what we did.
On that occasion, Cummings described how “people like Bill Gates and that kind of network” of globalist oligarchs were telling the UK government what its Covid emergency response should be. In other words, Cummings was confessing that the general public’s perception of government is “all nonsense.” Government is just “staged theatre” to keep us believing in the “fake” political system.
The BBC kindly fact-checked Cummings’ 2021 Committee statement to ensure the British people were being properly informed. But, instead of investigating his revelation about an oligarch networks, the BBC desperately tried to convince its audience that politicians alone were the ones making the decisions (even though Cummings had clearly indicated that they are not the decision-makers).
Sky News, for its part, not only failed to report the nature of Cummings’ revelations about the network of “Bill Gates-type people” but squeezed in Cummings’ inference that these oligarchs were some of “the most competent people in the world.” There is, however, no reason to think they are.
Of course, Cummings isn’t the only insider to have blown the whistle on the true nature of the British state. Liz Truss, the shortest-serving prime minister in British history, was similarly shocked. She said:
What I found out when I got into Number 10 [UK prime minister’s residence and government HQ] is that, if I got to the top of the tree, I would be able to implement those Conservative policies. [. . .] What I discovered, is that I was not holding the levers. The levers were held by the Bank of England, the Office of Budget Responsibility [OBS]. [T]hey were not held by the prime minister or the chancellor [UK finance minister].
By virtue of its Royal Charter, the Bank of England is a private enterprise entirely independent of the UK government. The OBR is a public-private partnership that is an independent fiscal policy watchdog. Describing itself that way suggests it simply monitors government fiscal policy—taxation and expenditure. But the OBR also offers forecasts and, by presenting them to the respective parliamentary committees, actually shapes government fiscal policy.
The OBR’s “forecasting methods” are overseen by its advisory panel. This means that representatives from Vanguard, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, EDF Energy, McKinsey, KPMG, Barclays, and a slew of privately funded academic research departments and think tanks, such as Chatham House, are steering UK government fiscal policy—irrespective of which party is elected into office.
Like Cummings’ admissions, Truss’s revelations only confirm something many of us already know: Government policy does not reflect the will of the people. Government is not of, for, and by the people. These are baseless truisms. So, why do we believe them?
Why Do We Believe In Fake Government?
I suggest most people imagine electoral politics is meaningful because the entire legacy media has been perpetuating that illusion for decades, if not centuries. Conditioned as we are, we don’t stop to question the system and its players. Rather, we step back and allow the ones in charge to get on with business as they please.
The same deep state network funds both the corporate wing of the legacy media and the supposedly independent MAM. The corporate branch serves the powerful by directly propagandising for the state and by covering up on behalf of the state. Usually, this is done by calling everything that doesn’t align with a state narrative a conspiracy theory. Thus, the role of the corporate legacy media is to maintain the majority’s faith in government institutions and in the partisan political process.
The MAM’s role, on the other hand, is more subtle, and its objectives are slightly different. The MAM acknowledges concepts such as the uniparty and the deep state. But it then steers the conversation toward advocating some sort of party political solution—usually in the form of one political saviour or another. The MAM’s goal here is to return those who have wandered away from the Overton Window back to a degree of hope that the state can be reformed as long as they continue to engage in the muck of party politics.
The MAM’s other task is to openly discuss suppressed information and thereby gain the trust of those who no longer trust the corporate legacy media. Once that trust is secured, the MAM then reinterprets the previously suppressed information to suggest solutions or narratives that are amenable to the oligarchs but are actually anathema to their audience. In doing so, the MAM averts the possibility of the disillusioned taking any action against the oligarch’s interests by holding them in a state of confusion and apathy.
Here’s a concrete example. American MAM reporters have openly admitted that global governance overreach is a problem. These kinds of admissions are not within the remit of the corporate legacy media. The MAM then advocated the ideas of billionaires like Peter Thiel—a Bilderberg steering committee oligarch and prominent supporter of the Trump administration—as a hopeful solution to globalist overreach. But Thiel is offering gov-corp Technates as a path forward. These Technates are the most extreme form of Technocracy—which is the social control mechanism favoured by globalist institutions like the World Economic Forum.
Thus, the American MAM has acknowledged Republican voters’ wish to escape globalist control but has steered them to blindly accept gov-corp Technates. Encouraged to vote for Trump, what freedom-minded Republican voters have ended up with is perhaps the most authoritarian form of globalist oligarch control imaginable. At the same time, many ordinary Americans evidently believe they have struck a blow against global governance overreach by electing Trump.
That said, we should also note that election results seem to be so heavily manipulated that the degree to which they actually reflect the “will of the people” is highly dubious. Not that it matters much, because government is “fake” anyway.
The Deep State
The “deep state” enables “Bill Gates-type people” to meet and discuss their objectives with the bureaucrats and occasionally with the politicians who will implement the deep state’s collective agenda as policy. The oligarchs we see, like Gates, are really just the “philanthropist” PR guys for the globalist networks that convene within the deep state milieu.
Some politicians are more closely linked to the oligarchy than others. The newly appointed—not elected—Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney, is among the most closely connected. In an interview with Juno News, given shortly before he replaced Justin Trudeau as leader of the Liberal Party, Carney argued that his perceived weakness—being part of the globalist inner circle—is actually his “core strength“:
I know how the world works, I know how to get things done, I’m connected. [. . .] People will charge me with being elitist or a globalist, to use that term, which is, well, that’s exactly, it happens to be exactly what we need.
While his surprising confession is yet another deep state revelation, legacy journalists don’t care to comment on it with any degree of seriousness. When they do address the subject, they consider mention of Carney’s ties to the “elite” a slur heaped upon him by opponents. In their view, he’s really a liberal-minded free-market capitalist. There’s nothing worth questioning about his so-called “global elite” status. Just forget the deep state and move on.
In August 2023, political scientist Francis Fukuyama published “In Defense of the Deep State.” In that piece, he acknowledges limited aspects of the history of the deep state, which he describes as “a complex of military and security agencies manipulated the political system and operated in a completely non-transparent way to affect politics.”
I believe Fukuyama is referencing the branch of Operation Gladio without saying so. Operation Gladio—a four decades long false-flag terrorist campaign run across Europe by the intelligence agencies—also operated in Turkey. The Turkish branch was exposed when the Susurluk Scandal broke in the mid-1990s—something else Fukuyama didn’t mention, though he alluded to it.
Fukuyama writes that the deep state has been mischaracterised by US conservatives as a permanent and therefore undemocratic bureaucracy. But by arguing that the deep state is simply “the administrative state,” he embarks on a straw man argument:
The United States does not have a “deep state” in the Middle Eastern [Turkish] sense of the term. It has a large and complex civil service at federal, state, and local levels that is responsible for providing the bulk of the services that citizens expect from their government, what is known as the “administrative state”. [. . .] [T]he US “deep state” needs to be defended and not vilified.
Notably, Fukuyama is a longtime member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a deep state think tank. In that capacity, he was influential in the 1990s creation of the neoconservative Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Among his other deep state roles, he is an advisory board member of one of the CIA-run nongovernmental operations (NGOs)— the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
In such positions of power, Fukuyama and his fellow propagandists are reframing the deep state—characterising it as something it is not and selling the falsehood to the unwitting public.
The New York Times (NYT), agreeing with Fukuyama’s depiction of the deep state, describes it as “awesome.” Based on a six-minute propaganda-packed video, the NYT contends that the deep state was formed by “the workers otherwise known as civil servants, the everyday superheroes that wake up ready to dedicate their careers and their lives to serving us.”
Political science, however, has disproved the NYT’s and Fukuyama’s straw man arguments by empirically demonstrating that the deep state—as it is commonly perceived—does exist. It appears Fukuyama conveniently—if not deliberately—ignored that objective reality in his 2023 essay. Likewise, the NYT has failed to report the evidence of the deep state’s existence.
In political science, there are several related theories that debunk Fukuyama’s premise. One is the Economic-Elite Domination theory, which proposes that government policies are created for the interests of institutions or individuals whose economic and financial resources are significant. In such a system, the politician’s primary objective is to secure the favour of the so-called “economic elite.”
Another is the theory of Biased Pluralism, which suggests that electoral politics is corrupted by the wealth, power, and influence of the said economic “elite” and the corporations they own and/or oversee. Policy is thereby manipulated for the benefit of the “elite,” frequently to the detriment of wider society.
In 2014, political scientists Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page, emeritus professor of politics at UCLA and professor of decision-making at Northwestern University, respectively, analysed nearly 1,800 policy decisions made by the US government. They assessed the influence of various groups and individuals on policymakers in the US. Their objective was to understand:
Who governs? Who really rules? To what extent is the broad body of US citizens sovereign, semi-sovereign, or largely powerless?
Their conclusion:
Economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism.
As noted by Kit Knightly in an Off-Guardian article last year, when people discuss the “deep state,” they are most certainly not referring to the “administrative state.” This is an observation that all of us, including the NYT, understand. Knightly accurately observed:
[W]hen we talk about the Deep State [. . .] we’re talking about corrupt military and intelligence agencies, with ties to big business, who really control the government using “elected” politicians as sock puppets. We’re talking about the machinery put in place which impoverishes the poor and undermines human rights to further authoritarian control over the people whilst facilitating and accelerating the transformation of public money into private profits.
One of the UK’s deepest deep staters is former member of parliament Rory Stewart—aka Florence of Arabia (or of Belgravia). Educated at Eton, Stewart stayed in academia, becoming a professor of international affairs at both Yale and Harvard. Then he served briefly in the British army before being appointed to the British diplomatic corps in Indonesia, Montenegro, and Iraq. In the latter country, he was in the US-led Coalition Provisional Authority and advised the British military. Stewart has also been UK Minister of State for the Environment, for International Development, for Africa, and for Prisons, and was Secretary of State for International Development. Also, he chaired the UK Defence Select Committee and sat on the National Security Council while Secretary of State for International Development.
Needless to say, given his list of credentials, Stewart is widely considered a spook. When his reported role as an MI6 operative was put to him, he told the BBC that he had “served his country”—then added that if he were a spy, the Official Secrets Act would bar him from admitting it. This was hardly a resounding refutation.
Furthermore, Stewart has served on the Triliateral Commission and the European Council on Foreign Relations and is a frequent Bilderberg attendee. Indeed, it is difficult to think of any politician (former or serving) more firmly embedded in the network of deep state think tanks than Stewart.
But that’s not all. Stewart was earmarked early on in his career as a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader and was invited to participate the YGL class of 2008. He became a member of the Ditchley Foundation, whose focus is Anglo-American relations.
In 2013–2014, he served the oligarchy as chairman of one of the deepest and darkest globalist think tanks, Le Cercle, billed as a “secretive foreign affairs group.”
Le Cercle meeting at the Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington DC. December 2016.
Image published by former Prime Minister of the Czech Republic Václav Klaus (< ahref="http://web.archive.org/web/20190921051858/https://www.klaus.cz/foto/detail/157">source)
In October 2023, Stewart caused a bit of stir on the genuinely independent media circuit when he told Politics JOE UK:
[P]olitics is based on lies. It’s based on pretending to the public [something] that’s different from what it really is. Even in schools. So we’re taught that Parliament [. . .] scrutinizes and votes carefully on legislation. It doesn’t. Most of the time the MPS have not read the legislation. In fact, often I would go into votes and my colleagues would not even know what we were voting on. [W]e just go and follow the whips and vote. [. . .] The MP doesn’t have any power over any of this. It’s all pretense, right! So, because of all these lies, which are basically that it suits the politicians, and it often suits the media to pretend the politicians have this kind of clear decisive power and authority and they know what they’re doing. It’s very, very unsettling to turn up in the House of Commons and realize that actually most of this is a sort of theatrical performance.
It seems clear from his statement that Stewart concurs with Cummings regarding the UK’s parliamentary system of government being a “fake meritocracy” with “fake responsibility” and having a “fake cabinet government.”
But then again, Stewart’s words do contrast sharply with his role as a deep state operative. Why would his ostensible “handlers” permit us—even desire us—to know about the fakery?
By the time Stewart first became an MP in 2013, he had already served in the diplomatic service for nearly two decades. In that capacity, he was almost certainly working for the intelligence agencies, Plus, he had been a Professor of Human Rights at Harvard University since 2008. It is thus absurd to imagine that Stewart came to parliamentary politics without knowing how political authority functions. His apparent surprise at discovering how government actually worked was evidently an affectation.
As for Cummings and Truss, to what extent they have any idea where power lies is hard to say. In the state, as in any compartmentalised, hierarchical, authoritarian system, most workers inside it know only what they need to know in order to perform their given task. Though it seems at least possible that Cummings and Truss were genuinely shocked by what they discovered, the same cannot be said for Rory Stewart.
It is in analysing the second part of Stewart’s seeming revelation that we can start to understand why Stewart said what he did:
There is very little power anywhere. You are largely powerless. You know, these words that you sort of heard in the back of your mind—you know, “lobby fodder,” “the whips.” Suddenly, you’re like, “Whoa! This is very, very much more extreme than I had begun to imagine.”
[. . .]
In modern Britain, power is everywhere and nowhere, and it’s very interesting. The journalists think that the power lies with the Prime Minister. [T]he prime ministers say, you know, I pull on a lever, it’s not connected, I can’t get anything done. It’s kind of civil servants, but the civil servants think, “No, we’re not making decisions, we’re being bullied and pushed around by ministers. Maybe the journalists have the power.” And then, you know, around it goes in a circle. Or maybe the bankers have the power, except the bankers feel the politicians are screwing everything up. So, it’s very, very diffused. And some things happen, of course, but when they happen, [I have] absolutely no idea.
Rory Stewart
Here, then, is this former chair of the highly secretive and influential and elite Le Cercle trying to convince us to believe that authority is so diffused it barely functions at all. Leaving aside the evident fact that we live in Biased Pluralist societies dominated by an Economic Elite, if the exercise of their authoritarian power is haphazard, as Stewart contends, it is truly remarkable how consistent the outcomes of policy decisions are. Those outcomes rarely, if ever, benefit us, and yet they almost unwaveringly benefit the self-same “economic elite.”
Take the UK government’s Covid-19 policies, for example.
The UK policy response to the pseudopandemic had a hugely detrimental impact of the real economy, which affects most of us. Yet it was a time of unprecedented wealth creation by and for the oligarchs. While every single policy decision increased the mortality risk for all of us, billionaire philanthropists—the “Bill Gates-type people”—never had it so good.
It doesn’t really matter which major policy arena we look at. Whether it’s the policy response to climate change or to the energy crisis or to spiralling global debt or to wartime sanctions—or even to war itself—the outcome is always the same. Not sometimes the same. Not occasionally the same. But consistently the same. Oligarchs always amass more wealth, influence, and resultant power via government policy decisions. And usually those decisions are made amidst crises.
The deep state mechanisms for controlling political authority (Biased Pluralism) include lobbying, the whip system, and political party funding. Simultaneously, the outcomes from using these mechanisms benefit oligarchs above all others. The benefit to them is unshakably uniform.
It is therefore amusing to listen to deep state operatives like Stewart try to convince us that power is “very diffused.” There isn’t a scrap of proof to support his argument. On the contrary, all the available evidence suggests ever-increasing concentration of power.
Clearly, that power is exercised by the deep state, not by the party mouthpieces. If we look to the European Union, the appointed EU Commission may nominally rule the EU, but it is Le Cercle and other members of the deep state milieu who determine the EU’s policy trajectory.
Politically speaking, European (and all) voters are practically irrelevant to the powers that be. But as sovereign human beings able to effect change in their own lives and capable of joining together and acting as one, the people are not irrelevant at all. In fact, it is clear that the potential of “people power” to rise up is what scares the deep state actors. To resist the control of oligarchs, all that the people need to do is exercise their own authority.
Escaping Le Cercle of Kyklos
Government—especially government alleged to be democratic—is the primary control system favoured by oligarchs. But what most citizens recognise as the government, or “the state,” is really run from behind the scenes by the oligarchs at the centre of the deep state. They engineer government laws and rules and regulations and even executive orders through policy agendas that are set by deep state think tanks. Think Trilateral Commission. Think CFR. Think Club of Rome. Think Bilderberg. Think Le Cercle.
The surface-level government jurisdictions (national, regional, city, county, parish) serve only to foster within the populace a false perception that average citizens have some semblance of control through democratic processes. In short, systems of government make people believe their opinions and votes matter. But those expressions of choice are nothing more than soporifics or stimulants that keep the public in their place—either quiet or agitated, but unable to effect meaningful change.
Consider the US presidential and congressional elections last November. Americans voted for what they thought was candidate Trump’s technopopulist policy platform. His followers had high hopes of freeing themselves from what they sensed was the overreach of globalist institutions like the WHO and the IPCC. In exchange for supporting years of debate, enduring months of campaigning, answering pleas for donations, and, ultimately, filling in their ballots, Republican voters got for their efforts an intelligence-linked oligarchy whose leading voices want to do away with representative democracy and install a privatised state we can call a gov-corp Technate (a concept discussed in a different context above).
Similarly in the UK, though only a small minority of British voters elected the so-called government last July, the primary concern of Labour supporters was the cost of living, given that families are continuing to struggle with comparatively dwindling incomes in the face of rapidly escalating prices. What they got was a government led by Prime Minister Kier Starmer—evidently an active member of a deep state policy think tank, the vaunted Trilateral Commission.
Under Trilateralist Starmer, the Labour government’s obvious and unsurprising policy is to exacerbate the cost-of-living crisis by targeting the most vulnerable—the sick and the disabled—by cutting their benefits while simultaneously massively increasing defence spending. This one-two punch intentionally diverts UK taxpayers’ money away from the people who deserve support to the least-deserving of all: arms manufacturers and their beneficial shareholders.
This is what government does—always, without fail. It’s standard practice. Government does not serve the people. The idea that it does is absurd. Government exploits the people on behalf of the oligarchs who often have a hand in creating the system of rulership—of the rulers and the ruled. Voting for the next government in the hope that something will change is beyond futile; it borders on delusion.
Why do oligarchs want to control other people? What is it about this cluster of immensely wealthy and often prominent individuals that makes them crave authority over our lives? Is it megalomania? Is it psychopathy? Are they so used to ordering people around that it feels natural and normal and right to them? Or perhaps dictator-like control is a family tradition they have inherited? Maybe none of these reasons apply. Maybe a combination of them do. Who knows?
One thing, however, is abundantly clear: Controlling the peons beneath them (as they regard us) really matters to oligarchs. It is virtually an obsession. They spend billions on propagandizing us. They tirelessly invest in ever-more-sophisticated control mechanisms. If there is any psychology driving their obsessions, it seems to be based on insecurity rather than on confidence. The need to coerce, manipulate, deceive, or violently assault the populace stem from fear of the masses—from terror of the potential power residing in large numbers of people who no longer believe the narratives they are given.
So, what are we to do?
We could start seriously thinking about stateless solutions. We don’t need government—and we never have. Constructing a voluntary society, perhaps based on the rule of law, would seem like a reasonable long-term objective. In the shorter term, whether we implement macro societal change or not, the process of moving toward a voluntary system would be beneficial.
Once we recognise that the problem is government, or rather the fact that government is controlled by oligarchs and always has been, we would do well to focus on maximising our independence from the state and thereby from government. We don’t have to stand on the barricades or smash the state. We just need to come together in our communities and support each other’s progress in disconnecting from the state.
We can take conscious steps every day. We can live off-grid (as far as we can), use no form of payment but cash or barter, homeschool, grow food where possible, establish LETS, engage in counter-economics, and more. All these efforts enable us to move out of the clutches of government. It isn’t easy and it isn’t convenient, but the alternative is perpetually some degree of tyranny. At this moment in history, we are approaching an extreme form of tyranny: an Algocracy.
We have known for thousands of years about the morbid circular evolution of governments (Kyklos). Polybius (200–c. 118 BCE) figured out that monarchies become tyrannies that rule by force until they are overthrown by aristocracies, which, in turn, eventually become corrupt.
The West’s solution has been representative democracy. But that form of government, Polybius noted, is, like monarchies and aristocracies, perverted by oligarchs to become “extreme democracies” led by demagogues. They ultimately create a new kind of monarchy—the Third Reich, for example. And around and around we go.
Le Cercle and elitist cliques like it won’t have any power if we escape from the circle of authority they are at pains to maintain. There is no point in them barking orders at an empty room. Our absence from the orbit of their so-called governments is what the rapacious oligarchs fear above all else. This is self-evident. They make every effort to keep us tied to Kyklos.
Our objective need not be to win the battle. Instead, we should consider abandoning the battlefield to never set foot on it again. Kyklos is not inevitable.
Iain Davis is an independent journalist a researcher from the UK. You can read more of Iain’s work at his blog IainDavis.com (Formerly InThisTogether) or follow him on Twitter or subscribe to his SubStack. His book Pseudopandemic, is now available, in both in kindle and paperback, from Amazon and other sellers. You can claim a free copy of his new book “The Manchester Attack” by subscribing to his newsletter.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
You can say what you want about Trump. The guy has guts. Challenging the unspeakable world bankers never done before. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/trumps-proposed-shadow-fed-chair-plan-challenges-powells-authority .
Read the long crybaby tirade in the article why Armageddon will arrive if a shadow representative without power other than a raised finger participate in the FED’s Board meetings. 😥 😭 😩 😳 😡 ………………. 👺 . 😅 .
That system works for the city of london remembrancer – to stop any reform of the London corporation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_Remembrancer
Xi China’s population only ~ 400 million now ??
The population numbers thing needs serious re looking at.
It is from the same source that tells you the world is dying due to Human-caused climate change.
This is AFTER the Corona virus antonym. The 400 mio vaxxed slant eyed rice eaters are SAFE now.
You cannot have a “Deep State” without first having a “State.” There’s been no such thing as a real, true “State” since the Caveman days, when the ground he walked on was the greatest reality of his existence. Like the Spartoi who in Greek mythology sprang fully formed from the dragon’s teeth, this monstrosity we now call “State,” replete with leaders and legislators and jurists, sprang up the moment humans decided to view one another as steps on a hierarchic ladder. The good, the better and the best became a cage humanity locked itself in and threw away the key.
And now we all concern ourselves with ferreting out this “Deep State” and ridding ourselves of it – when all our efforts should go toward finding the missing key that will unlock our cage.
But the ground of his existence was not (as our generally acquired state of mind assumes) – the ground of a material world determined by such ‘rationalizing laws’ as to set authority by which truth is officially determined as the arbiter of reality.
I do agree with the premise at a deeper level – the split of the mind to levels set in conflict, such as to generate a hierarchy of judgements, that mask over chaos as order – a state that cannot be but temporarily attained by sacrifice or denial of true felt shared being.
It is the nature of a ‘deep state of dissociation’ to protect its projections as thereby saving the little that it hath (invested in the body temporal as a stake in defence against total exposure to loss (reality uncaged).
The mind set over the body gives power (projects the function of mind) TO body.
That thought is creative is not a private means to grasp, possess and control the life of the body and world, but be-living one can and HAS such power immediately sets the cage of our own making, to operate AS IF against our will.
Responsibility for thought (consciousness) brings the ‘state of mind’ or active thought system, to awareness – or noticing. I cannot – of myself’ – undo the errors of thought by which I think to see, determine meaning, and generate response. But a state of denial can be persisted in by engaging in the ‘war on’ or the ‘search for’ the errors or rather sins that must find their target to exact due sacrifice.
Such the self-righteous or self-validating ‘virtue’ set against perceived evils by which to attack in the Othered before they come home to roost. The wage of judgement in the mind that would lord it over reality, entrances to an unreality given power over the living – that is ‘death’.
If this sketch hold anything to value, let it be for the living, for law serves the living and not the reverse. Revealing truth is not fascination with lies in fixation on conflict and horror. But how shall our focus be released from such futility but that we share in the living in place of attending or engaging with the ‘dead’.
The ‘creation’ of charged oppositional polarities as a state of grievance born of self-specialness,can be seen as a state of vested countermeasures against feared, projected or modeled fear or pain of loss. The Ground of (our & all) being is of a Presence that time and place ca NOT define, cage or commodify as assets – but as gain of fiction which runs denial/sacrifice of truth AS IF EXTERNALLY determined.
But I don’t want to go among mad people,” Alice remarked.
“Oh, you can’t help that,” said the Cat: “we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.”
“How do you know I’m mad?” said Alice.
“You must be,” said the Cat, “or you wouldn’t have come here.
~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
PS to recognize our thought system is insane is to no longer be totally insane (dissociated from reality). A light has entered or been given welcome that is outside our ‘control’ yet intimate to a Self we discarded, denied or lost, in the gaining of the Armour and mask of a world of lack, threat, opposition and adversity.
Yet we do live in a world of choices while lie and truth ‘compete and conflict’ as a split mind. Learning to make better or more truly aligned choice to outcome or fruit must first recognise that actions spring forth from meaning created in the or indeed as a ‘mind’ that is masked or runs hidden to the perceiver or ‘front end’ of a process of selective interpretation – often running subconscious defaults to mutually agreed ‘programming identity’ – as what keeps ‘you’ safe by evading or mitigating fear, pain and loss in masking, filtering and limiting controls.
honestly I think that most reasonable, thoughtful citizens understand quite well that politicians who run for office are not the guiding force behind state decisions
it’s the same division of labor that naturally and necessarily is characteristic also of large private organizations
can the CEO of a leading international corporation really be expected to grasp in any meaningful sense all the intricate, complex aspects of the business environment and formulate a detailed plan of operation based on that?
the only solution is to delegate, rely on teams of experts, and focus on the tasks which are uniquely incumbent on a figurehead
namely PR, making speeches, wrangling with internal squabbles among subordinates, acting as a liaison to other powerful organizations, rallying the foot soldiers of the hierarchy to boost esprit de corps charged with implementing the initiatives set from on high, etc
from the point of view of substantive strategic planning, this role might be derided as fit for an “empty suit”, but obviously, if no one performs it, or if it’s performed badly, the consequences can be disastrous
halfway aware people vote for Trump or Boris Johnson or Barack Obama not imagining that their candidates are geniuses who will personally supervise grand reforms, but because these candidates have been constituted or packaged as brands symbolizing a large team, the members of which inevitably stay out of the limelight and are drawn from the ranks of deep, pervasive influence networks
a US President may sit with advisors regularly for briefings, but is primarily occupied with, yes, being “window dressing”, being the mouthpiece of the team
and like with members of the US Congress, in the pay-to-play American system, a lot of the words that come out of the mouth of this figure serve the primary goal of making it rain, so to speak, ie opening wide the wallets of potential well-heeled donors
some investigative journalists I think have also looked into the question of just how much legislation that gets enacted at all levels of government, across the US at least, can be traced back word-for-word to model policy proposals created by private think tanks, and the percentage is, unsurprisingly, very high, unfortunately I can’t remember the source
even if some elected representatives actually do draft laws on their own, you can be sure that they’ve all passed through an extensive program of indoctrination at the graduate schools they’ve attended, aimed at aligning their ideas and modes of thought with the acceptable paradigms, so that nothing they write will deviate meaningfully from the approved orientation
the climate-defense fanatics are a perfect example of how this alt-media repackaging of an elite agenda works
their core of zealots all believe that they are rebels battling the greedy, environment-trashing establishment, and the activist influencers they follow frame their cause as a guerrilla war against entrenched interests, which they continue to buy into no matter how many rich, powerful players rake in billions from the implementation of these agendas
Thanks again Iain. As we accumulate the thousands of years of marginalized truths together at one time the inevitable transition to a rational human occupation of Spaceship Earth can begin in earnest. It’s truly startling how much like the at-large serial murderers, elite management is openly outing themselves, desiring us to catch and pants them. In our faces, folks!
What has been obvious all along is breached policy ideas which are NEVER enacted. Like eliminating money and secrecy in voting, politics and government. Like taxing unearned income and not taxing earned (labor) income. Like non-stop genocide and prison camps for Native Indigenous and their lands. Like any wars since WW2 and an MIC military empire budget ($1.3T) that escalates every year is now the largest US Discretionary Expenditure. Like a private central bank FED & Treasury, making money, the exclusive Goblin Treasury of the economic elite whose Interest on the Debt Expenditure will exceed ($1.6T) the military empire’s budget in 2026. Like allowing the above hyper vacuumed discretionary wealth to turn all of humanity’s lives, possessions and property into a Casino of playthings for this elite. All and more are as obvious as the nose on our faces. They and we have known and talk about these above hypocrisies as needing solution since post WW2. While their “well, we tried” explanations have worked so far to keep us confused, along with sheep herders like Rory Stewart, openly stating “greed is good”, “Deep State is kinda awesome!” is truly rolling the dice behavior. ‘I have a flute, and a cliff, i want you to walk off…’
Indeed, the Zen practice of not-doing, is our most powerful first step.
Wow! what an article – and spot on – I’ve said for years, that the face of the leader in government changes but the hidden agendas going on in the background never skip a beat; the world is fast becoming one big corpocracy, fronted up by virtually powerless and inane politicians whose job it is – is to keep us all believing that our votes matter, when they don’t.
Iain Davis claims ‘most people imagine electoral politics is meaningful’, but what evidence might turn this opinion into fact? Also, that most governments are traitors to their citizens because beholden to the deep state or ‘le cercle’ is old news. I suggest more exposure of its ancient tribal identity. Let’s stop bowing to anti-semitic fear propaganda.
le cercle is not old news.
People need an excuse. People need politicians to avoid co-responsibility and to avoid seeing their own cowardice in the mirror.
The Cabal need them. The Oligarchs need politicians. The working class need them.
The politicians wouldnt be there if people didnt want them. The politicians fulfil a role. It is sad we must go through this denial phase from the sheeple again again and again.
It was the bad bad Politicians fault.
Except that Cummings is as ‘deep state’ as it gets. That’s why he had so much power and gets so much publicity. He was the state enforcer as the UK descended into dictatorship under Johnson in 2019 and 2020, with Parliament suspended, hardline Brexit imposed and the covid lockdowns. The rest is just window-dressing from Cummings.so that the plebs think this is a democracy with people ‘on their side’. The only real question is which faction of the ‘deep state’ works for.
“In fact, it is clear that the potential of “people power” to rise up is what scares the deep state actors. To resist the control of oligarchs, all that the people need to do is exercise their own authority.”
That is the nut of it right there. No need to fight, just stop playing their game. James Corbett’s new book Reportage, also comes to the same conclusion – we need to do our thing, community by community. It’s our best move.
But in the mean time you are being stripped of your resources by the same people playing the game, you almost have to beat them at their own game, to receive any gain.
That a mob hate rises against its perceived oppressor is exactly the basis of the ‘reset’ of hate-driven virtue as the hidden foundation of the Terrorist state – a state that runs beneath any and all appearances as the willingness to USE Communication as a weapon of private self-specialness for vengeance set over life.
This ‘mind’ runs normal-lies-ed as the basis of a structural substitution for living consciousness.
That which truly Moves and Lives us – Is Who and What we Are (the always unfolding of and sharing in).
“Dont move until you feel the movement” is (I have read) a line in a film in which a an anally overcontrolled man is taught to dance.
We cant literally freeze until our tick box permits – but that we move to freeze response to life – THAT is an act we are trained NOT to notice as part of our ‘survival kit’.
The basis for community is not a ‘solution’ to an evil or sinful problem – else we bury the madness in its foundations. We are always already alive as a movement of being – with, through and as the living. But a mind-set in structure is blind to anything but as such structure dictates – and acts as if it SEES and knows.
Pain of conflict given protection by structure will not easily, readily or lightly re-evaluate its investment. But the breakdown of structure is inevitable or intrinsic to seeking and losing of self, identity or reality in the transience of the always changing.
Rational structures will always seek to substitute for and replace living relationships until every (moment of) relationship is recognized as the opportunity to honour and share in the gift of giving and receiving one.
In the ‘mean’ while we are variously invested in each our own versions of “I WANT IT THUS!” – though the full tantrum is rarely so exposed but set in a state of frozen conflict from which victim and victimisers arise in every shifting mutually reinforcing archetypes of a Broken Constellation.
Our world holds compounded and toxic debt-conflicts that appreciate or grow by ‘appreciation’ in ‘solutions’ that buy more time for delaying the ‘inevitable’ that for the ego of self-image means death – for truth undoes self-illusion – regardless the ingenuity by which it stamps the face of a present as the continuity of past into future.
How many other multi personality disorder ID names do you have.?
Everyone knows your long winded style.
It’s all about money. Money is god in capitalism. Money is what people believe in. Money makes the world go around, they believe. Money is necessary, they say. What would we eat if there was no money, they ask. Why would anyone work if there was no money system?
The idea that money must force people to work, that without it no-one would do anything.
So people have been led to believe in a man-created thing that is basically a fraud, deception, a lie, and the root of all this evil you talk about. Money is the common denominator of ”economy”, ”elites”, ”oligarchs”, ”state” and ”war”. Money is what capitalism is all about. Buying and selling for profit.
And, at the same time, most people have no idea what money is. People believe – they don’t question. So what is money? Money is debt. Debt is created in banks. Banks are privately owned businesses. The owners get profit; those who are indebted will be made to work for it.
There is no real money, as it’s all fake.
Around here time is money, and resources are what is god and what the people believe in.
And its not fake either.
Real money is gold and to some extent silver….since the sun started to raise in East.
No inflation, no deflation. The only thing is, it is long term. Your risk is a waiting time of max 5-10 years. No speculation only independent purchase value. It is THAT easy man!
The aim is dominance through debt and usury. Here is the old question again: When and how did evil usury become kosher?
Money itself is a very novel invention. It hasn’t been around the globe until the advent of capitalism. Five hundred years ago, peoples in the Americas had no money, had no state, and had no capitalism. The Incas had a lot of gold to make artifacts and pave their buildings, but they didn’t use gold as money. Moneyless societies existed as a norm, and there are still peoples who don’t have money.
Incas and other ”Indians” or ”savages”, as they were called, were killed and robbed by conquistadores in their thirst for gold and land, private property.
Conquistadores were European Christians working in the name of Jesus Christ and God.
They justified their actions with the Bible, with their Church, and with their national royal family, who in fact owned land and resources in their national state.
They established systems of slavery, imprisonment, torture, and murder.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Requirement_of_1513
Usury and interest can only exist in the money system. Whatever is used for money can be used for exploitation.
Accumulation of money (or capital) at the hands of the few is Law in capitalism. It cannot go any other way. That’s because in capitalism profit is the only motif and trade the only method of making profit. Trade or robbery.
“This is why pure Communism and a new world government is better“.
You missed the last sentence “Human values”. Fixed it for u.
If our governments were really ‘owned’ or accountable to the people, they could issue money for themselves and the problems surrounding money (an innocent means of acknowledging and exchanging value) would be solved.
The last time a political leader extricated his country from the international bankster mafia – Hitler was one – the banksters orchestrated a war.
I was wondering how long it would be before something like this appeared:
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/jordan/jordans-looming-crisis
What unfolding plan does Jordan stand in the way of?
the general public’s perception of government is “all nonsense.”
Nothing new, and overly convoluted. Under the charade of multi-party democracy and globalism, one person in each country controls all policy and law. E.g., see the series of articles by Larry Romanoff. And who controls that top dog? Big money: the plutocracy (not the oligarchy). The oligarchy includes the overt rulers. We don’t need political or economics “science” to see this. It is full steam ahead for “public-private partnerships” that Iain covered in earlier articles.
Having to choose between A Deadly Virus, and A Safe And Effective Vaxx –
i made my choice: The Deadly Virus !!
If you hear the claims
— ‘Palestinians want to leave Gaza’,
— ‘Hamas wont leave Palestinians leave Gaza’,
— ‘Hamas uses Palestinians as human shields’.
………guess the source…
“By deception shall thou do war.” Motto of the Mossad
The Israel military?
Pending, A typical sing of a MAM calling for its mummy.
Eight hrs later still pending….
All in all, most democracies are demoncrazies, run by power hungry bureaucrats and NGO heads, the hallmark of demons. Sextortion is another one. The third one, money, is free to print for the FED and other big banks.
Davis says: “We don’t have to stand on the barricades or smash the state. We just need to come together in our communities and support each other’s progress in disconnecting from the state.”
Davis as British does not reference what happened to the Diggers and Levellers. nor does he address the content e.g of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mission_(1986_film).
Corbett pushes the same Intentional Commune sort of solution.
But why actually should the Cabal, however constituted, tolerate what Oxfam once called Nicaragua under Daniel Ortega “The Threat of a Good Example”?
Good article Iain, excellent concluding paragraph.
Abandoning the battlefield that has become a fake Commercial overlay of everything.
Governments can be found with a simple search on ‘Dun & Bradstreet’, along with all the other Corporations we know so well.
Citizens have, without full disclosure, been fraudulently converted and identify as the bonded surety for what only looks like their name, but in all-capital letters eg. JOHN C DOE.
This NAME is traded as a security, and provides collateral that enables our fake governments to borrow fiat currency at interest from unaccountable private Central Bankers.
Three City States play a large role in this world wide deception; they are the Vatican City, the City of London, and the District of Columbia.
When looking up the D-U-N-S numbers, apart from British government departments appearing and therefore implying that they are registered companies rather than public entities are also the names of Members of Parliament, implying that they too are registered companies. Yet, when cross-referenced to Companies House they do not appear as registered companies in their own name. They appear as directors or past directors of other private limited companies.
Random examples that I checked included the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn.
Both BJ and JC appear with two entries showing two addresses – both their parliamentary constituency address and a Westminster address in Dun and Bradstreet. In BoJo’s case he is still listed as a company with ‘MP’, yet he no longer isnan.
https://www.dnb.co.uk/duns-number/lookup.html
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/
You forgot Beijing.
Russia ‘encercled’:
https://dissidentvoice.org/2025/03/the-us-occupation-of-greenland-began-last-night/
The Danes will soon come to realise the truth of Kissinger’s aphorism about being an enemy of the US being dangerous, but being a friend can be lethal. Meanwhile new NATO head; Rutte, keeps spouting on and on about defending the non NATO, non EU, NAZI run Ukraine (to whom, ironically, Denmark donated all their Artillery and Ammo) but remains silent on the blatent invasion of a fellow Nation’s lands. Ycnmiu.
How godlike they must feel.
Ignorant Pricks.
They’re all gonna die.
Just like us.
True, but better to be the driver than the driven … ‘Our’ biggest problem is that we generally know what to do, but it is illegal. Moreover, these mongrels have ensured that they have sewn the path-to-righteousness with so many trips, traps and hurdles that we’re collectively ensnared by their webs-of-deceit, almost to the point of bewilderment as to where to begin. ‘Our’ problem is that we’re generally tooooooo patient whenever decisive-action is a neccessity, we dither when we should be damning.
They’ll be ages in a “Purgatory” after, not a pleasant place.
Yeah but not soon enough. What we need is a global terrorist organisation. They really wouldn’t like that.
Or come together in our communities to create a network of mutual aid and solidarity. Consider: http://solaris-ontario.org
In a nutshell: “We [need to] escape from the circle (circus?) of authority they are at pains to maintain.”
I bet sunnyroll moonrocker crashes this gig with some heavy mental frankfurt kraut rock school critical theory jive. However,after one of his showstopping performances, the Bearded Bard takes the laurels by a mile and hurtles into the hall of fame.
Ian, are you overlooking the origin of these people’s power? It has arisen exclusively from economic strategies that have developed into a ruling structure, which, the stronger the economic position of the actors became, was increasingly subjected to the wishes of their economic strength. Today we have reached the end and demise phase of that structure in which everything has consequently become a business model, including and especially the domination of others. Structurally, it ultimately becomes the only possible business model that maintains the existing rule, which must suppress everything and everyone that does not serve it.
Hence the goal of total monitoring and control of all through a digitalized technat. After this business model, there will be no need for any other, the pseudo-elites assume.
But they are obviously running out of time …
There is no “we”!
Remind folk, That Iain is regular featured on the shill network who does the above called U.K colon (column).
The other MAM grift is the Hopuim of Jesus or 3rd temple death cult screaming wishing for armageddon so there messiah can come back.
Keep hopium.
💯🔥👏👏👏👏👏🔥💯
Bollocks mate. Im watching you.
Also!
https://unlimitedhangout.com/author/iain-davis
Moon, dark side, sunny?
I never watch UK Shillum, but I would bet money that Iain D is no longer on their Christmas card list after the Manchester event ding-dong between Brian Gerrish and him. Read this exchange between them.
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-controlled-controlled-opposition-ab3/comment/79906711
I am not here to defend Iain, he is a big boy and can do it himself, since he is regularly abused in the comments section of his Substack. Giving him credit where credit is due, he still engages with his abusers. The whole Manchester thing turned into a shitshow in his comments, with levels of abuse between commenters that I have never seen elsewhere in so-called alternative media. He has the most open comment section on Substack of any of the better known faces. Only very recently did he ban a couple of people for OTT personal abuse.
If Iain D is some type of controlled opposition, he acts very differently to others who block, ban and ignore criticism. Rather, he engages directly with each comment and then the battle commences.
Compare and contrast with Miri Finch who does not address criticism, after the revelation by people that her father has an OBE, among other allegations accusing her of being a shill, controlled opposition and the like. She has chosen to ignore it, rather than defend herself. She even deleted a comment from one of her paid subscribers linking to the series of Substack articles by one writer (a group really) about her.
By the way, I know it is YOU, the prolific multi-IDer, just in case, you thought I hadn’t twigged you this time with the ‘sunnymoon’ name.
You can keep changing your name, as often as you like, but I will always spot you. You are dead giveaway.
The prolific multi-IDer is you.
Your so mental you actually reply and upvote your own posts.
You even have separate arguments with your multi-IDers.
Everyone knows your yourpointbeing, Edwige, I_Left_the_Left, Armistice – another time – The Real Edwige, Jenner, Pilgrim Shadow, Lu1, Erik Nielsen etc etc
Sik fuk.
You average 5 multi-IDer plus different posts per articles for the last 4 years.
Get help. You jesus fundamentalist 77 shill.
You’re replying with the very ID Rolling Rock said was a multi, FFS! Come on guys, you can’t satirise this XD A2
Sam, you will see Trollie has made that same comment including the list of names using its other monikers ‘proxi’ and ‘entitlement’ in the past.
Whoops….I guess Trollie forgot or was too lazy to change the writing style and content. This is comedy gold.
gorden banned.
researcher banned.
shamen banned.
money circus banned.
The website shill which is YOU is allowed to have 10 different Id’s,
Your writing style everyone knows as Edwige and the above.
None of these guys are banned. If you are on correspondence terms, by all means suggest they pop by and leave a comment. A2
😂 😂
Now scratching around randomly, throwing more names into the pot.
I have close to 50 bookmarked comments of yours, using your different monikers showing IDENTICAL grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, writing style and content.
Woud you like me to post more of them than I have so far? Or remind you of previous one?
Now, you post evidence to demonstrate I am any one of the other commenters.
C’mon big mouth, let’s see your evidence. Wake me up, when you do.
You have two options, post the evidence (which you do not have), or stop lying. If you continue to lie I am going to bury you, metaphorically speaking of course 😉
Brilliant, Trollie meant to post from one of its other monikers but screwed up?
Same email address as its other IDs? Or confused which email goes which ID?
That’s what happens when people try to play games.
Throwing your toys out of the pram now….diddums. Don’t cry, you can invent more names, it will keep you busy haha.
For months, you have been inventing new names so that you always have a stock of them, as others are busted (by me) and then disappear.
You do love to project….
Where is your evidence that I am more than one name? You don’t have ANY. Because I don’t do it. I have only been commenting since April 2024, not four years.
No sane person throws out a list of random names without something to back it up. Especially, when the accusatory list of names, is repeated by your other IDs, (proxi and entitlement) in the same format.
I told you before, ask Todd Hayen for a free seesion, since you have a special fondness for sticking the boot into him. Yeh, I know it upsets you that he charges CAD $200 an hour for sessions, as you have mentioned before. Well the truth is, it upsets you that anyone earns more than the minimum wage – tough, get over it.
Perhaps he will feel sorry for you and consider it a worthwhile ‘investment’ if he then doesn’t need to waste time responding to your pathetic jibes.
It will do us all a favour.
I am sure we will talk again. We, meaning just me, Rolling Rock with twenty of you as your other monikers.
I am open to being wrong and to new information I may not be aware of or don’t understand. The OTT bile some exhibit doesn’t bother or interest me but I will not accept it directed towards other commenters on my Substack threads. I have said I would block people or bots that engage in this stuff, and I have blocked a couple I think. But where new information is at least interesting, though often buried in venom, I do try to look at it. Recently, many claims were made about image analysis and manipulation. Having looked at the claims there was nothing substantive to them in my view.
Incidentally, Iain, AND everyone ELSE for THAT Matter…
MY position Is the SAME NOW As when I FIRST made this,
So VERY long ago. ALL that time And NOTHING Has CHANGED
EXCEPT for the WORSE, and people’s around the world STILL
REFUSE to BAND TOGETHER put ASIDE their PETTY ASS,
COSMETIC differences and DO what NEEDS to be DONE,
once and for all BEFORE it is all gone too FAR to STOP it.
Because it WILL be GENERATIONS before we could POSSIBLY
flip it OVER, once they’re Precious lil RESET is COMPLETE. 😔
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Crr-ZjRIebK/?igsh=ZXd0YzlkbjhiemNh
“…Is it megalomania? Is it psychopathy? Are they so used to ordering people around that it feels natural and normal and right to them? Or perhaps dictator-like control is a family tradition they have inherited? Maybe none of these reasons apply. Maybe a combination of them do. Who knows? “
The Devil !
😄 😆 the divil its self.
Jaysus, surey even Mary could’ve seen it was a split personality disorder family tradition of the megalomaniac psycho YHWH trinity:
Where that could have been inherited from is another peculiar quandary though.
” Father forgive them for they know not what they do ” Very applicable in your case my dear Luney !
“Luney !”
On the other hand, if Lu cifer is the the single deity you might wish to learn, quickly, how to be contrite.
Unless, of course, Hazmat Putin can pull you out of the fiery hole.
Lu miere you are most definitely not by dear Lu ney !
😂
Boru:
a regular Jimmy Cricket with plenty of greenback (and/or Roubles) “In God We Trust“.
My dear Lu ( ney) are you an aspiring Hells Angel or just a regular mason for the, now defunct, Georgia Stones ?
His remarks are nothing more than were already revealed in the comedy TV show ‘Yes Minister’ over forty years ago. The idea that there are Whitehall mandarins ie civil servants deciding policy – itself a misdirection – and politicos are just empty suits is nothing new.
Cummins just scratched the surface, he didn’t reveal the depth of control and manipulation by the actual conspirators, whose NGOs and think tanks among other supranational organisations influence the Snivel Service in shaping policy, nor did he name the names of the policy shaping organisations, let alone those behind them.
I should have added in mentioning Billy Goats by name, Cummins wasn’t doing any damage to the controllers. Apart from Billy being just a frontman, for the vast majority of the public he is still viewed as a philanthropist. Just a man “giving away his billions” to help kids in Africa fight disease.
The term philanthropist is mistakenly thought of as charity, and not the scam that it really is, which is more accurately, the establishment of tax-exempt foundations that are a means of increasing wealth and influence.
Philanthropy is PR for the $uiturd$.
Nowadays, whenever I hear the term ‘philanthropist’, I instinctively reach for my revolver. 😛
He’s a political genius. He came up with the word “back” – which nobody had ever thought of before. So they made a film about it!
https://hbr.org/2011/03/take-back-control-of-your-work
Iain Davis, Ladies And Gentlemen. 🔥👊😉👍🔥
“that person [Terry] was, like, ten times more powerful and important than the [foreign] secretary of state [Lammy].”
The Lammy who was a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader and was Britain’s emissary to Bilderberg reputedly paid for by an ex-head of MI6? That’s some mighty good window-dressing….