UK MPs call for digital identity to “tackle illegal immigration”
Is there anything Digital Identity CAN'T do?
Kit Knightly
It turns out that the solution to illegal immigration is instituting a nationwide system of digital identity, issued to every baby at birth and containing all your social, education, financial, medical, and employment information.
At least, according to the 40 or so Labour MPs who co-signed an open letter calling for such a system.
Of course, that digital ID could solve the immigration “problem” should come as no surprise. After all, it can solve every “problem”.
It can make sure our elections aren’t rigged. It can protect our children on the internet. It can prevent the spread of disease. It can lower crime. It can tackle truancy and benefit fraud. It can government eliminate inefficiency.
Oh, it’s good for the economy too!
Yay!
Digital Identity is the Swiss Army knife of political policy. It has an attachment for everything, even funny-shaped ones you never use.
That’s why virtually every government in virtually every nation on Earth is keen to get one set up, to make life easier and safer for all of us.
And for no other reason.
This is nothing new. They’ve been saying it for years, but this louder and prouder, and worthy of note for that.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Talking about UK MPs.
Priti Patel, formerly Home Secretary, after being made a Dame Commander of the British Empire at an investiture ceremony at Windsor Castle.
The former health secretary, Thérèse Coffey, was also awarded a damehood, but failed to hold on to her seat of Suffolk Coastal.
Ex-Chancellor Jeremy Hunt joins his former colleagues James Cleverly and Grant Shapps in being awarded a knighthood,
Michael Goves was also given a knighthood.
Who says evil is not rewarded?
There used to be an old TV show in the 1950s called “You Asked For It,” staring Art Baker. Somehow that seems appropriate to this discussion. For a long time “they” have been looking for a hook to get their digital identity going – and for a long time “they” never quite found it.
Till now. The “illegal immigrant” issue has reared it’s ugly misshapen head to where “they” would be fools not to sink their hook into it. And so they have. For a long time Brits, Europeans, Americans have been squealing about how “illegal immigrants” are taking over their countries, raping their daughters, murdering their grannies – you name it, there’s probably an “illegal immigrant” out there doing it right now.
Soon, they won’t be doing all those horrible things any longer – thanks to the magic of Digital ID.
Friends, neighbors, fellow countrymen: You Asked For It. (Did you ever.)
My National Insurance number is digital. It’s alphabetical too!
I’m not sure that “digital ID” offers any benefits at all to the public. It only fixes problems that are artificially created as pretexts for needing digital ID.
Given that a person can lose all their digital devices in a disaster like fire, and there HAS to be a method for reclaiming your identity without those devices, it follows that identity theft can be done using that same method. Therefore digital ID offers no security benefit whatsoever.
Unless you cease to officially exist when your phone dies.
Digital ID isn’t there to help you. It’s there to profile you and monetize from that data.
It’s a form of blackmail which can be used to keep the future you in bondage.
Your DNA is another goldmine for them. All naughty citizens will eventually be eradicated.
I hear people say by desposing of their digital device they will give themselves a get-out-of-jail card. Let’s see how that plays out when they require a digital device to purchase food.
The planners HAVE thought of every evil thing to get this long planned control mechanism in place. It’s up to us to know how it works and possibly try to circumnavigate it.
“Let’s see how that plays out when they require a digital device…”
Eventually, we will be the “digital device.”
Man Machine. I think the TPTSB took Kraftwerk literally.
A person only exists as a corporate entity ie. a dead thing that needs representation.
Never accept the term person or the term you.
The digital identity will be linked to the person and not the living man/woman.
Understanding the above is the get out clause.
I have listened to people talking about this for a number of years now.
It all sounds very logical – diabolical but logical – and it may even be true.
But so what? How is it a get out clause? Genuine question.
If you can offer a concrete escape route from what they have planned then I, and I’m sure I would not be alone in this, am all ears.
Eventually, “digital ID” requires the “chip.”
I am chipped as you are chipped as he is chipped as she is chipped as zir is chipped as they are chipped as we are chipped together.
(apologies to the Beatles)
Birth certification is digital id.
No. It is a certificate to prove your mom and dad, and place of birth. An important document for a child.
My birth certificate doesn’t prove who my father is/ was. It was falsified at the time of my birth like tens of thousands of others.
Nothing is perfect. But we do actually a job to secure most children know their outspring and their real father and mother.
You mean analog, not digital.
The famous 40 beheaded babies (touchy subject) the devil in the desert and 40 days of fasting.
Never 27 or 38.
Had to be 40 during Lent.
You say “some guy in his forties”, you never say “in his twenty-seventh or thirty-eights” so yes, Lent is good for you.
Students of irony will know that the primary ‘donor’ countries all have some kind of national identity system. In the US get a lot of people from Central and South America and in Latin America practically the only thing you can do without your DNI or Cedula is be a tourist.
One of the reasons why the UK is such a popular destination is that its still one of the countries where you can get by with no ID. I grew up there and the idea that you had to carry government ID with you at all times was totally alien — you didn’t even need to have a driver’s license with you. The system worked because everyone was (mostly) law abiding but, unfortunately, its also very easy to abuse. Which is why people are upset about ‘immigrants’ — its not foreigners that people don’t like, its ‘foreigners who don’t comply with laws, ignore customs and generally crap on the place’. (The culture in many countries is, unfortunately, one where legality is just a matter of what you can get away with.)
The UK started being like everyone else when the old paper licenses were replaced by the photo licenses. These rapidly turn into national ID cards. (Here in the US although the states issue licenses the requirement for a “Real ID” standard means that your license is now effectively a national ID document.) Once you get ID established then its only a couple of steps to make it universal and to include all sorts of other useful information with it. Then the logical next step is to use all that tasty information…..
Incidentally, most Europeans carry something that’s looks a bit like the photo page of their passport. That’s their ID. You see it at airports. (In Russia its traditionally known as a passport — the ‘internal passport’ as distinct from the ‘external passport’ you use for travelling outside the country.)
So as the 1% pivots from DEI to the other side, the supposed anti-refugee-labor side, this is supposed to convince the all sides to go along with the enforcement apparatus of great reset centralized totalitarianism? The psychopathic political class is way out of their depth, so deep in magical thinking. They smell of Macbeth’s, all.
Lidl is an expansionist, one could say consumer-imperialist, German supermarket chain that scores by aggressive price dumping for acceptable quality. Like ALDI, the fastest growing discount grocer overseas, Lidl has entered the American market. However, as in the UK, the free movement of goods and the unlimited import of potential state-sponsored welfare customers seem to clash disharmoniously due to culturally different habits.
Lidl and Aldi though privately owned are no different to the other large but public limited companies such as the UK national supermarkets or multinational supermarkets such as Carrefour and Auchan.
Lidl in various countries has a loyalty card with two tier pricing for some items and Aldi to its credit doesn’t have one. Although, Aldi during the plandemic in Australia required its staff to be double poked to work, along with Coles and Woolworth.
Once any business reaches a certain size they all step into line with government dictats and globalist policies such as SDGs, DEIs, Agenda 2030 and the rest of the nonsense.
Thes supermarket chains are a scourge on humanity, since they control the retail end of one of life’s essentials ie. food. They have grown too large, killing off independent retailers and squeezing margins for small farmers and producers in the process.
In the future, they will have no hesitation in denying service to members of the public. For example, to unjabbed customers, if and when the next scamdemic arrives or based on carbon credits, social credit score or any other draconian edict issued by the PPP governments.
I hesitate to mention this, because people might get hep and then a good thing is ruined. But, at any rate, my local farmer’s market is great. Prices are cheap, they only accept cash, and they have homemade fries and antiques, too. A friend told me that’s crazy, my farmer’s market where I live is expensive. But hers is a city market. Mine is a farmer’s market out where the farmers live patronized by farmers. My fingers are crossed that it lasts for a while. They just chopped off the quarter parking meters in the nearest city and replaced it with camera surveillance. I was really enjoying those parking meters too. Now I park in handicapped, rush in the library, get my book or DVD and rush out again. I’m waiting for the summons in the mail. Just hoping that their incompetence will work in my favor. How I dislike modernity.
“…customers seem to clash disharmoniously due to culturally different habits.”
I doubt he’d act like that in his own nation, and if he did, he’d likely be picking his teeth out of his shit for a month.
‘Bro’ world record holder. Does the sun shine in the store?, is that the reason he’s wearing shades. Looks as though he’s there to get a reaction, coached and paid part of the P-R-S outfit perhaps. Good acting but not worthy of an Oscar.
Slight pivot –
1. Legal immigration into the UK significantly outweighs illegal immigration.
2. One reason behind the hysteria over illegal immigration, is cultural integrity.
3. The country providing the most *legal* migrants, is India. Followed by Nigeria.
Anyhow, back to self-flagellating over those 20 people in a dinghy..
If your owners legitimately cared about their citizenry (they don’t), they would curtail immigration of both kinds. The citizenry has been pretty clear they don’t favor it.
Cultural integrity is a pretty good reason for “hysteria,” as you call it, particularly when it requires people to actively lie about objective reality.
If you want keep the nation known as England, the tap should be closed for both the Indians and the Nigerians lest you end up with India and Nigeria. How many Britons still live in India or Nigeria? Fractional percentages, at most.
The 20 people in a dinghy should be sent home, post haste, the dinghy destroyed.
Cultural integrity is a valid concern. Not one that I share – I’m the son on immigrants – but one that I respect.
It is so telling though that our politicians zoom in on the much smaller numbers of illegal immigrants, while throwing the door wide open to Indians & Nigerians.
The British public have been played. Again.
Quelle suprise..
I’d say the Indians and Nigerians have been played.
Being invited to a nation that sells the illusion of a good life and prosperity sounds appealing. But to find everything is taxed to the hilt and the streets are paved with dogshit and litter (instead of the promised gold) must be a strain on anyones mental health once they wake up and realize the brochure they were handed was 30 years out of date.
If you have ever visited either India or Nigeria, you will know that the shit on the pavements here, looks NOTHING like the mountains of rubbish and human waste on their pothole directions of travel (i would not call them roads!) over there.
Import the 3rd world – become the 3rd world.
I’ve never witnessed an Indian or Nigerian walk their dog and allow it to foul the streets, and then leave it for others to walk in.
If the rules are enforced this would never happen. But they’ve been torn up to create that shit hole look. Enforce the law of the land and habits will change. Keep it two tier and it all goes to hell.
Brits have had no sovereignty or representative democracy for decades now. Somehow, citizens must rediscover a healthy patriotism and end alternating WEFUK governments of occupation, which at the very least means destroying the subservience of the UK’s political class to the globalist/Zionist cabal now ruling much of the planet. What the UN unsubtly calls ‘replacement migration’ is just one of the elite’s policies used to divide, rule and ultimately conquer entire nations on behalf of the rising NWO.
I wonder, did the British empire consider cultural integrity when they colonized India et al?
The United States has 800 military bases around the world. I wonder if they need green cards to enter and work.
I’m not making a blanket statement here, but perhaps if Empire nations did not ransack and ruin, then other countries and cultures wouldn’t be so quick to show up at our doors.
Your point is perfectly correct. Imperial countries do create refugees.
Letting them in, however, legally, is a different question. The owners of the country prefer immigrants for 2 reasons: cheap labor, and rack-renting. While the majority of the working class would prefer immigrants to be kept out, because they don’t need any more competition for jobs than they already have, and they don’t need any higher rents than they already have, their owners believe the more’s the merrier. For monetary reasons. They expend less money on labor, and they make more money by keeping the housing short and the rents up.
Anti-immigration, just tangentially, used to be a hard-core left-wing labor issue, until labor got lured away from labor issues and into “moral” issues, which are arguably hardly moral.
I, sadly, agree about labor issues becoming moral. I belong to two of the wokest unions in the world.
As for immigration, I am no expert. But I do feel that particularly in the past 5 years the whole immigration situation is just another spectacle of catastrophic messaging.
I believe the worst of it was created. Just one more fake pandemic to keep the masses upset, demoralized, angry and combative.
Also, with regard to immigration legal or illegal, if it were all done away with who would pick the lettuce, work in the chicken and meat factories and care for our parents and grandparents, (and one day perhaps us) in nursing homes.
There are very few, if any, white American citizens in many very necessary but not very glamourous jobs.
If lettuce picking etc., were unionized, properly compensated, etc., they will come.
Judge for yourself.
In the 1840s, Hindu priests complained to Charles James Napier (then Commander-in-Chief of British forces in India) about the prohibition of suttee by British authorities. Suttee was the custom of burning widows alive on the funeral pyre of their husbands. According to Napier’s brother William, this is how he replied:
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
Not so much about judging behaviour, as an illustration of what happens when cultures clas
Point taken.
The issue is “uncontrolled” immigration legal or illegal.
…not if you watch the TV. Or listen to the radio. Or read a newspaper. Or…
The Pied Piper is only playing one tune.
This is a great, overlooked point.
Uncontrolled numbers, but a very controlled global policy agenda.
“The issue is “uncontrolled” immigration legal or illegal.”
All immigration is perfectly under control.
Immigration is being used as human quantitative easing.
The UK is bankrupt and living on credit after many decades of mismanagement and subversion. To live on credit you must have a good credit rating and be able to make interest payments while falling into deeper debt. The UK is saying to global finance “look Bro, we’re bringing in more labourers to pay taxes, be consumers, and boost GDP. We can keep paying interest for the forseeable future.”
So the problem will keep growing exponentially – as will immigration – until everything collapses and the banks take posession of what’s left.
The banks are not able to take everything, even as Labour desperately drives towards the 2030 Agenda goals it is tasked to do.
Fuck ‘em, my pitchfork is sharpened & I’m not alone. Not by a long chalk
Oligarchy has always loved such systems of control – starting with “branding” their slaves with hot irons.
Mass immigration is government policy. Katy Hopkins was sacked and villified for exposing the state being behind the influx of millions of people from their home countries to Shit Britain.
Now its the combined global elite destroying the monetary system.
Order out of chaos is their cry and so there will be far worse to come.
The reason gold is flying is that the Zionist Central Bankers behind the financial crash have been filling their coffers with the only thing left with real value.
Maybe now is the time to start reregistering your home, business, land, car, and bank account in your real name as the beneficiary and stop the crown from laying its greasy hands on everything you think you own.
Problem, reaction, solution.
I get it now.
Naming names:
https://winteroak.org.uk/2025/04/09/the-big-plan-and-the-great-gaslighting/
Spot on!
Not sure if it still applies in UK but if you get stopped driving a car without documents, you used to get a “producer” from the police.
This was/is a piece of paper requiring you to produce your documents at a police station within 7 days.
Now, as quaint a custom as this is, can anyone see the problem ?
The logic for carrying ID is so strong that, even though we know their intentions, it’s hard to propose a coherent reason for not having it.
Instead of trying to oppose, which is just going to backfire, the answer would be to restrict the ID required to the relevant situation-
A photo driving license for motoring
A passport for leaving or entering country
A choice of the above for official documents etc.
There are people who have neither. A fair system would see someone with a valid ID vouch for them.
This is a reasonable position to argue from and would be hard to argue against without proving the intention is control.
In the UK, when stopped by the police for ANYTHING, you are not obliged to give your name or address (in fact, you should seriously think about answering ANY of their questions), unless they arrest you giving the precise law for which you are being arrested.
When questioned, it is best NOT to remain silent as this could be deemed to be obstruction but should answer “I’m not obliged to provide that information”.
“A fair system would see someone with a valid ID vouch for them.”
Only if you’re happy living in a ‘papers please’ society.
You assume holding a valid ID to vouch for yourself is a good thing. Gates et al would have you believe that it is a human right to be able to prove your identity. Blair is a huge proponent of digital ID. Just the enthusiasm of those two feral half-wits and their mates should set off some warning bells.
My view is that it’s none of their business who I am or what I’m doing unless I am directly breaking the law (and even then I would question the validity of most of our ‘laws’, but you get the point). We are not supposed to be subject to the State (and I don’t mean in an abstract ‘freeman on the land’ type of way). We appoint a government to office to take care of the large-sale shit that would be beyond individuals or small groups. They work for us, not the other way around. People are being encouraged to view them as our rulers. They shouldn’t be viewed as rulers. They should be viewed as what they are – public servants. If anything, they should be the ones forced to constantly show us what they are doing. By tacitly accepting that these lackeys have the right to demand from us identification (and in the case of digital ID – every facet of our lives), we allow them to get away with it.
We lose our freedom one ‘required’ document at a time. Gradually, then suddenly.
“This is a reasonable position to argue from and would be hard to argue against without proving the intention is control.”
I don’t believe anybody needs to prove the intention is control. All that needs to be proven is the capacity for control to be enforced should such a system come to pass. That case is already proven beyond reasonable doubt, especially when digital ID is tied to the upcoming digital currency (in whatever form it eventually takes).
I think you’re looking at this issue from the wrong end of the telescope.
And, in principle, they, the Elite, have no control over what? Above the people? Don’t they control us? Do you think any of us, any insurgent group, endangers them in any way, endangers their control? Have you seen anyone? I just wonder, given that most obviously (and against the background of the plandemic and the subsequent digitalization rise) their intention is total control, why do they want this total control? For what reason? In your opinion?
It’s true that their control is all on paper, in the laws they write and the edicts they make. But their paper is backed up by their monopoly over violence – the armed forces, the police, the judiciary, the prisons, the social services, the financial systems, food supply, pharmaceuticals, power generation etc etc.
So do we endanger them? I don’t know. If everybody, everywhere suddenly decided enough is enough then it would be over tomorrow, because then the people would control everything. But that’s not going to happen. They’ve spent a long time providing bread and circuses to keep the people ‘happy’. But would it take everybody, everywhere. Again, I don’t know. I don’t know what they fear, what their calculations show them regarding their vulnerabilities. Are we closer to victory than we know? How would we find out? Questions questions.
When thinking about the issue of why they do what they do, I can’t get past Orwell’s 1984 – O’Brien’s statement to Winston Smith as he is torturing him …
“The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from all the oligarchies of the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.”
In my opinion, the people controlling the governments, the corporations, the supranational organisations (the people who actually really control them) have almost all the power. Almost all. I believe that power is like heroin – the effects fade over time, so the more you take, the more you need to take to achieve the same high.
Maybe it really is that simple. Or maybe it’s not. Unlike in the police dramas on the tv, motive is largely irrelevant. It doesn’t matter why they want to control us. What matters is that they do. We don’t need to know their motives to know that what they are doing is wrong.
the old joke about Bill’s masterpiece Windows was that every time users complained about its zillions of flaws, they’d get the reply
“it’s not a bug, it’s a FEATURE”
now being digitally tracked at all times is not a degradation, it’s our inalienable RIGHT!
What you’re proposing is anarchy.
Like communism, it sounds great until you try to make it work.
Are we to assume that no-one needs a licence to drive a car or a passport to leave or enter a country?
Most of us would like to live in an equitable society so we abide by a social contract.
And, yes, that means paying taxes and abiding by the law which should benefit the vast majority.
Unfortunately, we are still respecting our part of the bargain whereas those we chose to represent us have broken theirs.
This needs redressing – urgently, but most of us want to live in some sort of structured society.
I’m proposing neither anarchy, nor communism.
I have a driving licence and I have a passport. I don’t object to carrying either, or indeed showing them, but only under very specific circumstances ie trying to cross a border (unless I have my dinghy handy, obviousy), or hiring a car. I hope that clears that up.
What I do object to is the concept that digital ID is the next logical step, given the capacity inherent in its design and functionality for misuse. That potential for misuse is baked into the entire concept. Governments always tend toward more control if they can get away with it – Conservative, Labour, it doesn’t matter. It appears to be the nature of government. Therefore, giving them the wherewithal to exert hitherto undreamed of levels of control over everybody in the country seems like something we should all think about very carefully before backing anything they propose.
Equating caution in this regard with anarchy or communism seems a little misguided, particularly given that anarchy and communism are pretty close to being diametrically opposed systems, the former being a complete lack of control and the latter, total control.
Going back to your original post, I understand what you’re driving at in respect of limiting which documentation should be included in a digital ID system, but that is not how it will shake out. For our ‘convenience’, everything will be on there. They’ve already said as much.
A structured society is a good thing. I’m just a bit wary regarding who and what is building this new structure that is appearing in front of us in real time.
As an addendum to my previous reply, I meant to add that wanting a degree of privacy as a private person; and to hold public servants to account, rather than blindly obeying everything they decree, is not anarchism. Nor is it communism.
It just seems like common sense to me and, as you pointed out, it is simply expecting them to uphold their part of the ‘social contract’.
The social contract is the key.
In an ideal world we would trust the authorities to use our ID only for the ostensible reason when required.
I would have no problem with this – apparently at odds with several commenters here !
BUT, I don’t trust the authorities because, as we can agree on, they have reneged on their part of the deal.
Which leaves a tricky conundrum (On my part at least)
On the one hand I see the value of ID.
On the other hand, we can’t trust them to use our information for our benefit.
Please note I have not advocated the use of digital ID, only photo.
ID is a fact of life.
But, that doesn’t make it desirable in general terms.
I see the value of driving licences. I have lived and worked in Africa, South East Asia, Central Asia and other places where there is no driving test and no licence requirement. The standard of driving in such places makes French and Italian drivers look competent! So – driving licences for the safety of all.
I also see the value of passports in today’s world, with international travel so accessible to so many.
In both cases, I can even see the value of photo ID.
But. Given that neither you nor I, nor anybody else here (I imagine) trusts the government (any government), going further than the above examples is extremely dangerous.
You point out, correctly, that we cannot trust them to use our information for our benefit. The truth is we have no real idea how they want to use our information. We can make informed guesses based on the evidence we find but I can’t put my hand on my heart and say I know exactly why they want it.
There is also the question of whether the point of ID should be to benefit us at all, beyond the above examples. That seems to be straying into Blair and Gates territory. If we agree to carry ID for driving or travelling, it should be grudgingly and suspiciously, even if we can see the benefits. We shouldn’t encourage them by cheerfully agreeing to even things that seem like a good idea.
For my money – if in doubt, fight it.
Problem is, if I agree with you the whole idea of polemic debate dies !
I see your point.
Perhaps we could just agree quietly but just not tell anybody. I won’t say anything if you don’t.
Go on then !
Incidentaly, the three most treasured words of my youth.
“Social contract” is such a nice sounding phrase, isn’t it? Who could possibly object to it?
Maybe we should check who’s writing this contract though.
Just as with employment contracts, I doubt it’s objective, balanced, or a joint effort by all interested parties.
We wrote the contract. (In our heads)
We forget to ratify it.
Doh !!!
“Gates et al would have you believe that it is a human right to be able to prove your identity.”
Gates, as usual is wrong, and perversely so. Having to prove one’s “identity,” more especially on a global scale,is an affront to one’s existence as a human being. What are you, livestock? Chattel?
Exactly!
My default position is that anything he says, on any subject, is directly opposed to my interests.
Digital ID is part of the PPP gospel that the WEF mafia pushes through UN agencies to governments. See Iain Davis articles on this site a couple of years ago.
Absolutely.
I remember first seeing Iain talking about this on UK Column around 2020, although I believe he was onto it long before that.
We’ve been so programmed to think that government serves us that we accept the notion that what is useful for the government is also a necessity for serving public needs.
It’s hard to shake off this illusion even after the government has openly shown it hates you and wants to impair your quality of life just on a whim. As is happening throughout the West.
Just about everything government does is government overreach. Yet still we feel that government is a necessity and should be obeyed.
The sad fact is that without government to ensure a functional nation, things would be worse. But the country is now becoming dysfunctional so fast that any benefit is vanishing.
100%.
Without a national government, we would be back to managing things at a local or regional level (a sort of Game of Thrones scenario but without the tits and dragons). Now, I’m not sure that’s such a bad thing for all sorts of reasons, but the world has been pushed toward globalism for a long time and all systems have been set up to reflect that.
I used to get dismayed by successive governments banging on about ‘our place on the world stage’ as if it were more important than getting our own house in order. I now realise that they didn’t and don’t want us to be a house – they are aiming to make us an apartment in a huge global apartment block.
As you said – we have been conditioned over generations to believe that the government’s priorities are our priorities, even if we’re too stupid to grasp the nuances. We should just shut up and let them get on with it because it’s for our benefit/safety/health/[insert pressing issue of choice].
If we have to have a national government, I think we should go back to the system we had before the hijacking of power that followed the (unlawful) formation of political parties. It wasn’t perfect, but at least it was democratic and provided actual checks and balances.
I got a producer once (well, a few times) and took my docs to the local cop shop. My insurance company had mistakenly covered me for minus 1 minute (they got the year wrong on it’s expiry) so I had to get an updated doc from the insurance company and re-present it, which I duly did. The copper acknowledged it and that was it. A few weeks later I was arrested for failing to appear in court for driving without insurance. I took the day off work and turned up at the court and showed another representative of HM effing Dibble my insurance doc, proving I was insured. I didn’t need to go into the court room. No apology from anyone. Arrest me, make me take the day off work to appear in court for THEIR mistake. It still p*sses me off now. Slack arse mothers.
BITCOIN FIXES THIS https://youtu.be/pLrQycud5GI
It’s well-appreciated by now but worth re-stating: this has been constructed as a classic right-left pincer attack. Tackle illegal immigration and crime generally for the ‘right’; equality, public services and wokeness (hence ‘Adolescence’) for the ‘left’. Of course it’s not a right/left issue but an authoritarian/libertarian issue. They’ve been trying to re-define libertarian as “far-right extremist” for years to destroy it on the left and weaken it on the right.
Blair at his popular wanted to introduce I.D. cards but had to back off – this will be a test of how much has changed in the last quarter of a century.
The biggest reveal is how those who previously couldn’t care less about illegal immigration or children living their lives on social media are now suddenly so deeply concerned about those issues. The “concern” is manifestly synthetic.
P.S, I’ve recently noticed a sudden influx of new Fiat 500s on the roads. Tiny cars for tiny living! It’s either them or even bigger SUVs. The latter will be used to clampdown on anything larger than the former. (BTW I’m not arguing a Fiat 500 might not be a good idea for someone living in an old city with narrow roads which was what the cars were originally designed for – but that’s not where I’m seeing them).
[It became a two-part answer (I later remembered to add one more thing… no, actually – it was so long initially; I’ll just collect more red thumbs, I hope, according to my best expectations).]
1.
This is how is constructed to you and others think it is a legitimate end goal of the *elite/elites* the negligible from a strategic point of view “ultimate goal totalitarianism”. Another objectification is in reality; something that I, for example, in various off and online places, against the background of the constant stressful regime of people, who assumed the inevitable reality that the “left” plan will prevail and will develop into something monstrous, back in 2022 I repeated to them and repeated that this is so wild and screaming, set according to all the rules of the theatrical production that 100% was created only to rise “Donald the Savior”, to kill the far-left crazy bug in the system and restore the millennial more conservative and traditional status quo, with the goal is to cut the wheat from the chaff and to obtain the stable seed (that is: the seed that has withstood the call the “far-left” time to recognize as an immutable reality the absolutely crazy nonsense that has never been a fact) and to insert and integrate it steadily and permanently in the time and world of new high tech that the elite plans.
For thousands of years, there was a man and a woman who made all the children, some of whom participated in all sorts of engineering, managerial, intellectual and ideological, and simple working roles under the rule of the relevant real ruling elites. And the most successful were always the people of the West and the North, mostly throughout Europe (we cannot fail to include the contribution of the peoples inhabiting the territories of today’s Russia; Tesla – Croatian, etc; but *the chosen* was excluded until they fix things with Palestine, they are punished, and in general they are not the smartest, but they have some of the best qualities among all the others to create unusually strong and time-resistant control systems in a cult style – such as the abrahamic religions – and also possess an animal passion, developed to the extent of mastery, in the money things, because of which they have traditionally been used by the real powers for the purposes of banking; but they are not inventors (they often, however, steal and ascribe to themselvs the invention of things), except Marxist and ugly contra-tradition, fake breacking psichology, and neo-Marxist (woke ideologies).
Not that the whites of the north and west are the most morally good — perhaps, though no one race is known to be very peaceful, they are the worst — but they are absolutely the most successful with a huge advantage in technological development. And better weapons are also part of this more successful, which is why the continuous successful domination (with extraction and plunder of resources from every others, a little slavery…)
For thousands of years, there was nothing like this, with a clear and consistent intention of mass imposition on such a scale of “biological sex and race are social constructs” (leaving everything else and taking only the most problematic fundamental terrorist threats at the level of obliteration). For thousands of years, there was no drag queen in kindergartens and primary schools, nor in school programs. For thousands of years, children were not offered to choose their gender instead biological sex. And for thousands of years, race was not a social construct.
But it’s been for a few years. And the most humiliated, attacked and endangered social construct became the white European heterosexual construct, a fictional social construct for thousands of years.
Second: this – completely artificial and planing – is amplified the more with the approaching the time for radical transformation with high tech, especially with the so-called “intellectual” ones, “AI,” at which time — first 10%, then 20, then 50 — of all the working people in the world will become useless in doing the work they’ve done, replaced by the same, still in its infancy, technologies.
…
->-> (the most interesting is next!!!)
… ->->
2.
…So: against the backdrop of the looming brutal radical transformation, in which, due to the sustained and comprehensive penetration of *intellectual* high-tech, 50% of all world workers sooner or later (rather sooner) will become useless, somehow suddenly, as if from nowhere, the left with warpspeed rises to the far left with an unusually powerful and multi-layered movement for the total destruction of millennial traditional norms (mostly conservative), strongly defending the unjustified oppressed racial and sexual social constructs, and the most endangered and cornered turn out to be precisely those social constructs whose ancestors built the best civilization in which many of the rest of the world wish to come and live.
(It’s not just that “whites were the nastiest and strongest, robbing and pillaging the wealth and labor of the rest of the world, and that’s all that makes life in the West the highest standard.” The West and the North have also most successfully implemented the ideas of building the best civilization… which is already coming to an end even without the so-called elites, even just because of the so-called “destructive technologies” that, if the elite disappears, immediately the next strongest and smartest, who replace them, will apply them for approximately the same evil purposes.)
So which 50% (conditionally speaking) are more unnecessary for the purposes of the elite and which are more necessary? Those whom the hypothetical (seemingly insane to the extreme) Left supposedly tries to defend in every way? Or were those who, for thousands of years — breeding only through men and women, not by *parent 1* and *parent 2* — are the engine and power of the elite to build the most successful civilization?
Then: who is endangered, and who is “saved”?
We saw: just as I had guessed since at least 2022. Donald the Savior (to the endangered conservative white hetero herd) returned on a white horse to calm, restrain, stop, perhaps even kill what the bad left cop played (but it was never intended to reign in the future, but only serve as a sieve, an example of “how bad it can get”, to point out an extreme example of the most insane “and let’s tighten up and get into the high-tech future with faith and hope (see that even God was with us, turning Donnie’s head to avoid the deadly bullet)”.
Here it is, the number one conservative-traditionalist who officially announced and hundreds of times in the media confirmed that Neuralink has a long-term goal of “Human/AI symbiosis”:
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1884670471201055192
29.01.2025
If this looks like a “Digital ID” to you (and every of the technologies that the elite wants to impose on us) for both the left and the right, with the goal of integrating everyone into the new system, fine.
(Maybe for all of them, but is there hardly room for everyone in the required 50% +-, which is why does it look more like adjusting and refining a future caste system? In other words: Do the elite leftists really want to give the oppressed groups a place (in the future) that they somehow didn’t deserve (not just because they were oppressed, but because they couldn’t achieve it)? I would never have thought that these sinister vaccinators and climate terrorists, spreading trans ideologies that can successfully, to several generations, destroy a mass of people and destroy the foundations of life, want to somehow save the underprivileged victims of white western/northern hegemony and oppression. Then why so stubbornly want to save them (right at the time when the end of employment is approaching for 50%)?)
“if the elite disappears, immediately the next strongest and smartest, who replace them, will …”
Do you really believe that the uberwealthy controllers are smarter than the best of the blindly following masses or the best of those of us here who do not follow along? Think Gates, Schwab, Musk, etc. Seriously?
This is all Trump’s fault.
In a nutshell: I understand what you are saying, that both by “fighting illegal immigration” they are selling to the right-wing digital IDs, as well as things like “Adolescence” – to the left/liberals/woke. It seems to be the most logical.* I reject. I have another theory: “Adolescence”, and the very (real) import of immigrants, and LGBT things, as well as the rise of any other similar *left* thing in Europe (Mostly Western + UK) is to accumulate the necessary (synthetically created) reasons and circumstances to come (not for everyone, but for conservative people, or “non-woke”) this “salvation” that came to the United States (and the foundations of which are perfectly expressed in Russia and Putin: fight with anti-traditionalism (LGBT, etc.) tightly bound to a wild digital reconstruction of society. Only there, as it corresponds to the society there, the form is a little more rude and tyrannical, which feels more like “what is usual” and less like new level of terror.
Look carefully at what happened in the US, how the play was played, and to whom it was directed: almost all right-wing (and simply conservative people) were deeply convinced that ultra-left totalitarianism would simply reign (Donal would never again be allowed to Washington). And what happened? (But more importantly: why did it happen?) But the coming unprecedented totalitarianism is a theory from the alt-media and now from the mainstream. “Again totalitarianism,” “No difference, two cheeks on one butt, all lead to totalitarianism….because both alleged parties support the genocide in Palestine (and are slaves to the Zio Banksters, the Jews).” This is spread by specific circles. (The opposing circles, the right, for years, have trumpeted that everything is over, Donald will not be allowed, and then there is the left terror, after which totalitarianism, so “prepare for a physical battle of life and death, for the separation of states.” And… nothing. Donald returned calmly on a white horse, no problem, and began the enchantment of the target group.)
Europe copied almost exactly the same scenario as the US, the same trends, moods and settings (and the same characters – including the characters Vance, Musk and co. – regularly stoke the fire). We expect the rescuers, the “conservative revolution” of the operational Dugin, the Rescue of traditional conservative Europe. Putin and Donald, who already play a huge role, can play a historic role.
(Usually, alt media is wrong because they are either operational or victims of operational workers – the smarter ones are victims of deeper operational operations. They are probably wrong about the future of the United States under Donald, and about Europe, and about Russia.)
What evidence supports the claim that Brits’ growing concern about illegal immigration (AKA the UN’s ‘replacement migration’ policy and ‘the great replacement’ conspiracy theory’) is ‘manifestly synthetic’?
I see that opticians have been taking taking pictures of eyes (scanning?) in recent years if you want new glasses. I’m tempted to say I’d rather go blind.
Seems President Trump has a lot in common with Chairman Mao…
https://www.unz.com/runz/president-donald-trump-and-chairman-mao/
..and this is not the only bad person that Trump has a LOT in common with. Just saying!
“Put on your leash, slave!”
In countries that trust their government, like China, digital identities are simply convenient.
‘Trust’ and ‘government’ should never be used in the same sentence.
Unless the word NEVER (always in caps) is right in there.
As Plato once said …
“Η κυβέρνησή σου σε μισεί”*
* Well – he would have done had he been around today, I’m sure.
What does it say there, with the Greek letters, what did Plato say? Anything about the right of respected ancient Greek philosophers to penetrate young boys to their liking? They usually say also and things like that, except for the tough and insightful philosophies.
That was a good guess, but what it actually says is “Your governmenet hates you”.
DON’T TRUST, VERIFY
Always.
Have you not heard of Stockholm Syndrome?
Do they trust their government, or do they simply accept its existence as a necessary fact of life?
All right boys. You finally got me. From today I am now in your group. I cant take all these thumbs down.
Trump is dumb and all his MAGA followers are rats following the piper. Vaxxes are good.. I now believe in clima change, limited energy and depopulation. Digital ID and Digital Love is the future. Real things are obsolete and dont live. Only the screen lives….without God.
The diseases are greed and vanity.
Trump merely epitomises the diseases more than most.
Don’t forget your $$$$$$$$$HOT!
https://www.globalresearch.ca/inactivated-influenza-vaccine-risk-public-health/5883829
The pointy end of the ID is the problem of course.
They already have most of our private details stored away:
Income, taxes, medical, criminal history, education, overseas trips, internet use, phone records and even TV viewing.
Question is: how will they use it against us?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
I misread this headline
‘”The next pandemic could start tomorrow.” The WHO.’
as:
‘The next pandemonium might start tomorrow.’
My brain’s right hemisphere has a mind of its own, though i think
it could be right…
not as catchy as “Pinball Wizard” I fear
the WHO’s greatest days are clearly behind them
From the “Progressive Britain” site:
They couldn’t be more obvious.
We would have found Osama Bin Laden much earlier, if Digital ID had been in force at that time. Further many children’s lives could have been saved….if Trump had not been elected.
Of whom are you doing a parody?