Actually, “personal beliefs” DO supersede “the public good”
Kit Knightly
Personal beliefs do not supersede the public good – and vaccination is a public good
The above quote – taken from a headline in the Globe and Mail – is wrong. It is wrong in general and the specific.
It doesn’t matter what “personal beliefs” are being referred to, and it doesn’t matter which particular “public good” is being protected, it is wrong.
It is wrong because “personal belief” is a placeholder phrase for “individual liberty” and “public good” for compelled action.
In this instance, it is talking about vaccination and religious freedom – these causes are often linked and used to sell decreased individual liberty as “common sense” to the “sensible” agnostic majority – but vaccination could be any behaviour, and religion any thought or opinion.
Good sense dictates and history demonstrates that anyone promoting “the public good” at the expense of individual liberty is steering society toward tyranny.
If you don’t believe me, simply observe the language used in this kind of editorial…
Respecting religious freedom is important, but it has to be balanced against other rights.
Freedom of religion was never meant to exempt people from societal obligations…
…we cannot allow those with anti-science beliefs to harm others.
The state cannot tell you what to think, but it can tell you what to do. Especially when it’s for the greater good.
That last one is particularly worrying.
When the standard of freedom is “you can think what you like provided you do as you’re told”, we really are in dark times.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Beliefs ARE personal…… that’s it. Anything else is just dogma, the dog’s mother, a bitch.
This reminds me of one of my dads quips when I was wee (a long time ago, he died in 1964): “I believe that everyone should do as they like and if they don’t do as they like, they should be made to do as they like.”
“personal beliefs” DO supersede “the public good”
Even a medical exemption made me a target at the workplace.
Contagion, viruses, vaccines… all PSYOPS.
The problem is when “the public good” is formulated, defined, codified, controlled and made actionable by psychopaths and misanthropes who hate all who are not in their class which is the vast majority of humanity. These degenerates say wars which profit them and harm humanity are in the public good/national interest. They tell us over and over again via their mind control apparatus it is our obligation/duty to do as they say, not as they do and do it without question reservation or qualm. They plan, prepare and execute agendas that empower themselves at our expense and detriment then coerce us to go along to the great harm their policies cause. COVID, WDM, Too Big To Fail are prime examples and none of them were held accountable. How long will we fall for their flim-flam and okey-doke?
I think it was in high school civics class at the latest that I learned the distinction between THE public good and A public good. The editors of the Globe and Mail and K Knightly don’t seem to have learned it yet.
Then there is the question of whether or not vaccination (technically A public SERVICE), in particular the mandatory type, is in THE public good, which is a matter of personal belief. So in that sense, personal beliefs do supercede THE public good, in that they determine what is and what isn’t. At least in a society governed of, by, and for the people with all their often conflicting personal beliefs.
Then there is the process of making certain personal beliefs epistemically authoritative to prempt opposing personal beliefs, in order to dictate THE public good.
“It’s for the greater good.”
Did this nonsense save you during covid?
Apart from the Nation of Islam Louis Farrakhan, the rest of the religious leaders and alt media personality’s sold the vaccine hard and that includes the great spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism and the head of the Gelug school. The current Dalai Lama who also sold the vaccine hard.
Infact your religious beliefs got you vaccinated harder.
Men in cloth and whites coats and suits = same whores.
Some churches would not allow the sheep flock in unless you was covid compliance (tested, Qr coded, track and trace, masked) but most of them closed as it was more important to collect the money for closure.
Churches in Europe also double up as vaccine centers.
Sheep flock religious freedom = death.
Agree. No one knows what the Religious Leaders mean. Religious freedom…..ehhh ok, all right, sure,……but ehhh to what exactly?
Exactly!!
What is it about a suit, a uniform, or religious garb that turns a puppet into a GIANT TURD.
Authority, or the symbol of it. People who are afraid of authority will do as they are told.
it’s the PRIVATE goods sold by the pharma labs for gazillions, those astronomically profitable substances filling the vaccination programs’ hypos, which really reign supreme, trumping all other considerations
It is wrong because “personal belief” is a placeholder phrase for “individual liberty” and “public good” for compelled action.
True and in addition there is not and never has been anything remotely good about vaccination apart from benefiting the bottom line of pharma companies. I rely on the excellent historical research of Suzanne Humphries and the now almost forgotten work of Charles Forward from 1932 that can for now at last be found at
https://dmatthews.org/souk/content/GoldenCalf.pdf
Please download a copy.
Thanks Dav, good link. The language at that time (100 years ago) was much more polite, precise and dignified.
Here just fixed the statement:
“Personal beliefs do not supersede the public good – and that vaccination is a public good is a personal belief.”
.
This Covid/Vaccination thing is a walk in the park compared to the “dark times” we’re really in. And somehow many people believe if they oppose the Covid thing they’ve done their duty vis-a-vis individual rights. The problem – impossible to lay out in full historical detail – stems in part from the all-too-human attitude that as long as those chosen as “leaders”say and do what the majority of people in a society would like them to say and do, then individual freedom is alive and well.
They don’t seem to realize that it’s not what “leaders” say and do that matters – it’s the very fact that there are “leaders” that insures the eventual loss of individual liberty. Leadership is fundamentally incompatible with liberty – they are mutually exclusive.
There is no such thing as a “good leader.” There are only (bad) “leaders” who momentarily just happen to say and do things people consider “good.”
Decisions must be made, right must be discerned from wrong, countries must be governed. Are you saying there is no such thing as a better (or worse) leader?
That’s exactly what I’m saying. Trying to separate leaders into “good” and “bad” is a little like trying to separate cancer cells into “good” and “bad.” All cancer cells lead eventually to the same place – some more quickly than others. And so do all leaders lead eventually to the same place.
Earlier this morning, I read a piece in Scheerpost concerning Haiti and its struggle to free itself from French colonialism. It seems that George Washington and his Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson were very concerned that the slave revolt in Haiti might succeed and could give ideas to America’s slaves. I’ve linked the article (hope we’re allowed to link other blogs). It’s a long article; the part I referenced is about 3/4 of the way down.
https://scheerpost.com/2025/04/26/two-hundred-years-ago-france-strangled-the-haitian-revolution-with-an-inhumane-debt/.
For good or ill, leaders are an inescapable fact of life, and not simply for humans.
Uncle Howard, but weren’t “the “dark times” we’re really in” accelerated precisely through “this Covid/vaccination thing,” “the Covid thing”? There is no “Covid thing”, Uncle Howard, there is the so-called “great reset”, but the old “new world order” (in the sense of social, economic and overall reconstruction, or otherwise said: the next stage of development according to the wishes of the elite), from which “the covid thing” is part.
But you say the Covid thing apart from everything else. You were actually saying that the pandemic was real. And also that “they’re not all together.” (Of course you will say so because it is advantageous to you; otherwise you must admit that the noisy events (“the war in Ukraine”, “the massacre in Palestine” – just like the “pandemic”, because they are its continuation, or “the next steps”) are artificially made for completely different purposes…) Did you also say that there is no such thing as “great reset”?
The bigger joke of that what you wrote is the joke that there was not a single red minus (before I put one). “Who sows what…”
Many thanks for telling me what I said.
We need more men with BALLS to say NO. That doesn’t mean ‘fighting’, that means refusing to pay any more tax than they can automatically steal from you, ‘bills’ etc, it’s all fraud and robbery. Hit the fckers where it hurts.
This I see as the most moral and courageous stance. Yet I have found only one or two as willing as I. Most people are petrified of the ‘police’, the ‘law’, the ‘courts’, ‘bailiffs’, ‘enforcement agencies’, their credit score etc… the MATRIX!
The traditional (fake) vaccines are the most effective bioweapons yet. The virus antibody scam allows an excuse to inject along with attenuated viruses the real culprits, “adjuvants,” the actual causative factors for autism. particularly the heavy metal (mercury) and aluminum varieties. They are de facto toxins, and most specifically, brain toxins. They are the primary cause of the autism pandemic. There is a reason that the captured, scurrilous FDA never demanded that vaccines are phase tested against a pure saline placebo control group. Or that the adjuvants alone without the ” viral component” in vaccines are tested against saline.
Why the most effective bioweapon ever? Just think what an autism rate of one in twenty young children does to the emotional and economic well being of a society. Particularly as they will probably remain debilitated for the remainder of their live, even beyond when their aging parents can no longer care for them.
If RFK Jr.’s proposed Manhattan Project study of the real cause for the autism epidemic doesn’t finger vaccine adjuvants, it will finger him as a total scumbag turncoat.
Devotion to the ‘common good’ by the Green [sic] Party UK:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fgreenparty.org.uk+%22common+good%22&atb=v347-1&ia=web
I do not think the Green Party today is using the term ‘the common good’ correctly. They are nothing but a co-opted party full of change agents (knowing deceivers) or useful idiots (well meaning but unaware) furthering the agendas of globalists and the controllers.
The definition of ‘the common good’ is to achieve the best for society as a whole but with respect for all opinions and not to marginalise any individuals or group of individuals. All individual rights are respected.
In the case of the Plandemic, if the definition of ‘the common good’ had been adhered to then individuals would not have been coerced or ostracised for not wanting the sludge in a syringe. Furthermore, scientists, medics and others who were silenced or cancelled would have been given a fair hearing and equal publicity to the state, corporations, NGOs and the Branch Covidians in the world at large.
The controllers minions do not use the term ‘the common good’ since they understand its real meaning, hence they say ‘the greater good’ which allows and encourages the steamrolling of individual rights in favour of their collective policy desires and use of the dumbed down herd to achieve these outcomes.
Note in quoted The Globe and Mail within the article:
I think it is useful to make the distinction between the greater good and the common good, especially when in conversation with those who think they are the same. They are not.
‘the common GOAD, or FLAIL, or WHIP’
And on the topic of manufactured beliefs, 50 million is going into attempts to dim the sun in a radical way. If we feed that 50 million into the accounts of the already wealthy, they might spend even more time in hot places and so their added presence will create the newly discovered solar flanjoparticles to become attracted to those hot places whilst the poor will get sun relief by getting pissed on more.
https://theweek.com/environment/why-uk-scientists-are-trying-to-dim-the-sun
And whenever these stories are drip fed into the MSM, it’s always couched in the terms of “planned” and “theoretical” weather manipulation technologies, as if they haven’t already been doing it for years. Imagine thinking that they have just been talking about this for DECADES, and never actually yet bothered to attempt any of it.
Excellent Anal-ysis.
aka
‘a heap of sh*t.’
Completely Flapdoodle.
Well, not with the old Red communists or the new Green ones.
And _ _ _ _ the Chosen.
No matter what anybody say I believe in my government!
The Party Chairmans recent death necessitates the Party’s Central
Committee convening a gathering of regional Party Chairmen in Rome
to elect a new Party Chairman. It’s far from clear whom the radicals,
the Bolsheviks (Majority), and the conservative Mensheviks (Minority),
favour for Party Charman ( aka – The Pope)…
Yes, we are living in dark times when honesty and integrity became just words. Scientists sell their souls (where is Marie Curie now?) and politicians try to perpetuate themselves in power by every possible trick. The thirst for money and for absolute power became unsufferable and “la joie de vivre” is dead. Solidarity and empathy are at the lowest levels known to humanity and I can’t see solutions. Sorry for the pessimistic approach, maybe I need another coffee
We are dealing with a totalitarian, religious ideology. Moreover, we were warned – again, and again, again. Unfortunately, I see very little indication of a serious response from the so-called “medical freedom movement”. The argument needs to be based around deprivation of liberty and due process; i.e. Magna Carta rights. That is, the vaccine pushers have to be forced into court to present their claims and evidence under oath. Otherwise, we lose!
—
Eugenics and Other Evils by G. K. Chesterton (1922)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/25308
The thing that really is trying to tyrannise through government is Science. The thing that really does use the secular arm is Science. And the creed that really is levying tithes and capturing schools, the creed that really is enforced by fine and imprisonment, the creed that really is proclaimed not in sermons but in statutes, and spread not by pilgrims but by policemen – that creed is the great but disputed system of thought which began with Evolution and has ended in Eugenics. Materialism is really our established Church; for the Government will really help it to persecute its heretics. Vaccination, in its hundred years of experiment, has been disputed almost as much as baptism in its approximate two thousand. But it seems quite natural to our politicians to enforce vaccination; and it would seem to them madness to enforce baptism.
—
Thomas Szasz (~2010):
Formerly, when Church and State were allied, people accepted theological justifications for state-sanctioned coercion. Today, when Medicine and the State are allied, people accept therapeutic justifications for state-sanctioned coercion. This is how, some two hundred years ago, psychiatry became an arm of the coercive apparatus of the state. And this is why today all of medicine threatens to become transformed from personal therapy into political tyranny.
https://www.szasz.com/Szasz50newpreface.pdf
https://www.szasz.com
—
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process
“No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.”
—
https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/civil-liberties-and-vaccine-mandates-heres-our-take
News & Commentary
Civil Liberties and Vaccine Mandates: Here’s Our Take
Far from compromising civil liberties, vaccine mandates actually further them. They protect the most vulnerable among us, including people with disabilities and fragile immune systems, children too young to be vaccinated, and communities of color hit hard by the disease.
Note: This editorial originally appeared in The New York Times on September 2, 2021.
—
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10127050
Learning from five bad arguments against mandatory vaccination
Maxwell J Smith, Ezekiel J Emanuel
2023 Apr 25
—
Jim Gottstein on Due Process
The Illegality of Psychiatric Imprisonment, Forced Drugging and Forced Electroshock in the U.S.
PsychRights
Sep 27, 2012
This video, shot by Lise Zumwalt, is of a presentation by Jim Gottstein at the 2011 PsychOUT conference in New York City, where he talks about how people’s constitutional rights not to be locked up and drugged or electroshocked against their will unless certain conditions are met are pervasively ignored.
https://www.psychrights.org
Wrong on all counts.
Personal beliefs DO NOT supersede public good.
Covid vaccination WAS NOT a public good.
see my above comment
Your first proposition is debatable.
The second is inarguable. Not only was Convid vaxxination not a “public good,” it was one of the greatest evils ever perpetrated on the human race.
Our postmodern “American” benefactors testify with a righteous pointing finger that Hitler’s attack on Russia was an “unforgivable aggression against fellow Europeans”. Above all, it testifies to their own inability to empathize with the situation of a nation at the heart of Europe, as whose heirs in particular are not allowed to define themselves.
They should try to question their own brainwashing as much as possible if they finally want to move beyond the “normativity” set by the Jews. But it seems to me that willfulness and malice are at work here. The same energy that also destroyed Germany and thus Europe and ultimately the entire white human race, sacrificing it to a perfidious “individualistic” vanity.
https://counter-currents.com/2025/04/counter-currents-radio-podcast-634-brandon-martinez/
“Screw your freedom!” In the end, and when push comes to shove, there’s more of them out there than we might think. I think that was verified with the scamdemic. It’s hard to understand such widespread agreement with such insane rhetoric, i.e., “The state cannot tell you what to think, but it can tell you what to do.” Then again, maybe we’ve allowed this to happen through all our previous acceptances, countless at this point, of doing what the “state” tells us to do. Maybe this is all the natural progression of long term acquiescence to what is presented as authority. We have all been conditioned to this point. You are not free, you are only as free as the state allows you to be. And that means, only as free as those that control the state allow you to be. That is called being ruled.
Man is free at the moment he wishes to be. What we got is a bunch of pussies who don’t truly want to be free, they lack the cohones for it. So it sucks to be on the same boat as all these wimps.
In 2005 Dr John Ionnidis published widely cited scientific paper that demonstrated that most scientific studies are false. So, it should raise serious questions about “The Science” and therefore what it means to be “anti-science”.
The meaning of ‘anti-science’ in public discourse is pretty clear: it’s a smear label to silence the critics of power, a weapon to defend authorities who believe scientific truths can be dictated, not disputed. Such blind faith is truly anti-science.
That’s true, of course. Science has become for all intents and purposes the religious orthodoxy. On our side, for those seeking truth and freedom (they are connected!) we should regularly challenge the notion that science is in fact a reliable demonstration of objective truth.
This needs to be said: the institutions of science and medicine are class institutions, that is, they serve the interests of the ruling class, not the interests of the majority of humanity. The are not neutral arbiters of truth of any kind.
During The Revolution, a revolutionary who doesnt destroy
The Mona Lisa on coming upon it, digs his own grave –
because you cant half carry out a revolution…
Iain McGilchrist in his latest post seems be be subtly swiping
at Popularism, maybe even at Trump The Vandal ?
https://iainmcgilchrist.substack.com/p/how-puritanism-works
Speaking of ‘beliefs’.
She’s passionate, she’s articulate, and on this issue, she’s right.
It’s a pity she didn’t take her own advice on the vaccine mandates:
‘You’re an adult. You have internet access. If you don’t know, learn. You can’t just go “it too compwicated, me no understandy, googoo gaga.” It’s not cute and it’s not okay. Grow the fuck up.’
More here:
https://dissidentvoice.org/2025/04/not-taking-a-position-on-gaza-is-taking-a-position-on-gaza/
No one is gonna tell me to grow the fuck up. I refuse to even THINK of Gaza until that tone is changed toward a VIP person like me, and only if my government tells me to do it!
She is hardly a dissident voice anymore, if she ever really was, and neither are so many of them that would not take a position on the biggest example of outright totalitarianism in our lifetimes. Not to even mention the genocidal aspects of “the science” of that. I guess the covid was simply too comwipicated for her to understandy, googoo gaga…. What a twit.
and that’s how you ignore genocide.
I know what you mean. But I do not see the problem legally.
If the government or municipal decide to make an autobahn directly through your house and property, or vaccinate everybody ‘for the public common good’, they have the legal right and tool of compensate (ekspropiation) for the loss caused.
Trump is trying to use this legal tool in relation to Gaza and Greenland for example. Offering the Palestinians to move to an other middle class country and live a peaceful life after 70 years of war.
The government can so to speak *buy people out’ in ‘the common interest.
I relation to vaccination for example, you can say no, and the government insist, they must allocate an area within the nation to those who do not want it, and pay the removal cost.
The legal problem only exist if people, ia the Palestinians or anti-vaxxers say no, I have been living here for generations and refuse to move out because of a new planned autobahn, oil drilling project, or national vaccination program.
If you say yes, ok I admit the government have its legal right to impose a new autobahn/oil drilling/vaxx project where I live, so let us agree a peaceful solution and compensation to me and those who do not want it.
Then there is no problem for both parties. Everybody get what they legally have the right to yes?
For example favelas/slum in Rio de Janeiro with the world’s best view to sandy Sea beaches and palms.
Government developers want to make expensive houses there for the rich because “its good for the economy”. You re-house people and buy them out.
Its only a problem if either part refuse to cooperate.
It’s not actually as expensive as one might think – buying people out.
Hamburger, anybody?
People don’t ‘believe’ they’re hungry, in pain, in gravity, the beauty of nature and the Love of their children.
They KNOW.
Beliefs are forced upon us by usurpers.
Beliefs come and go.
Beliefs are malleable.
Beliefs are a delusion.
We all KNOW that governments, corporations, religious leaders, many scientists, and the wealthy are corrupted by their obsession/fixation for money and control.
The evidence is overwhelming,
historically, and in front of us every day, every hour, every minute.
They believe they are Gods, destined for greater things.
Made zealots by their beliefs they are blind to Truth.
Beliefs?
Fuck em.
This one, reported on OffG the other day, deserves an editorial.
https://winteroak.org.uk/2025/04/23/the-way-it-is/
At the time of writing, I am, as usual, too horrified and ashamed of my last posts.
Not bad article. To sum it up, the picture of Pentagram with its head up/legs down symbolic to Christianity, and on its head down and two horns up symbolic to the Inversion, the Devil.
Ref:The internet is the tree of knowledge, the smart phone the apple and AI is the snake.
Digital identification and digital currency are the work of Satan and must be resisted at all cost.
They believe, top down, Nobody will ever know who is top, Breathe easy for ever, Promise, That feeling you used to have, Forgotten worlds, how many is counting,
Here and now, players, headaches,
Know at least the end of this era is coming soon, the earth is flat so far…
https://youtu.be/Ng2vTXxnD20?feature=shared
Thanks friend,
Best vid for song ever, an old fan..
The “common good” and the “greater good” are nefarious concepts. They represent collectivism as opposed to individualism. Collectivism is the foundation of left-wing politics and is woven into the fabric of socialist, communist, and fascist movements. Essentially, collectivism is used as a tool of social control.
The WEF isn’t reforming. It’s reloading.
Because this system thrives in secrecy. It survives on compliance. And it advances every time a citizen shrugs and says, “That’s just how it is.”
No. That’s not how it has to be. Not in your country. Not in mine. Not anywhere.
Something went wrong with adding the link – so here it is (very insightful re the Schwab replacement):
The Great UnmaskingNation First looks into the fall of Klaus Schwab, the rise of Peter Brabeck-Letmathe and how the globalist empire is unravelling.
https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/the-great-unmasking?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
APR 24, 2025
” The state cannot tell you what to think, but it can tell you what to do. ”
Are you fu@£ing joking? Wait yes, yes they are.
Notwithstanding the obvious gibberish of such a statement.
The state has been openly arresting people for thought crime in the UK for several years.
This is newspeak or doublethink. Amazing how standard it is now.
Yeah, Reiner Fuellmich was apparently just awarded 4 years in jail for telling the truth
And for those that don’t do what the state tells them? The Eugenicists and technocrats have been telling us what their preferred way is:
GEORGE BERNARD SHAW: [. . .] But there are an extraordinary number of people whom I want to kill. Not in any unkind or personal spirit, but it must be evident to all of you — you must all know half a dozen people, at least—who are no use in this world. Who are more trouble than they are worth. And I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board, just as he might come before the income tax commissioner, and, say, every five years, or every seven years, just put him there, and say: “Sir, or madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence?”
“But his murderous impulses didn’t stop there. A considerable number of people, Shaw argued in 1948, will never toe the line and are therefore no use to the rest of society. “[T]he ungovernables, the ferocious, the conscienceless, the idiots, the self-centered myops and morons, what of them?” he asked rhetorically. “Do not punish them. Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill them.”
I’m not sure, but I think Shaw had a lot of fun scandalizing people.
What the global controllers mean by “the greater good”:
You know you are in an abusive relationship when….
The ‘public good’ is apparently to believe:
That Palestinian toddlers are terrorists….
That we should take sides in a Russian civil war….
That poorly tested emergency use gene therapy is safe and effective….
That taking away civil liberties will keep us safe….
That Netanyahu, Zelenskyy, Starmer, Von der Leyen, Trump, Carney, Gates, Tedros, and now Peter Brabeck-Letmathe (WEF), et al know what’s best
And on, and on, and on…..
Think I’ll pass on that, thank you….
Corbett’s profile of Carney dug up an article he wrote about the Truckers’ Protest. It’s batshit crazy. He calls an entirely peaceful protest that at most committed some traffic violations “sedition” and “an insurrection”.
STill, he’ll be the next leader of Canada on grounds that he’s not Donald Trump.
“Personal beliefs do not supersede the public good – and vaccination is a public good”. These claims can also be rejected as anti-scientific. The first assumes that ‘the public good’ is an eternal truth beyond dispute and improvement by critical citizens and scientists, as if it were a sacred cow or commandment of divine infallibility. The second also assumes infallible, immutable knowledge about vaccination as good. This claim transforms science into faith or scientism, and knowledge into dogma. Again, such ‘knowledge’ denies science, progress and improvement, so ultimately becomes a public bad.
‘Public Good”. Translation: “Because I Say So !”
‘It means what those who have Power means it to mean,” Humpty Dumpty
explains to silly-headed Alice…
‘The public good’ is not the same as what is good for the public. More often then not, it is the inverse.
‘The public good’ is a soundbite that can mean whatever our overlords decide it should mean. All that is required is a well-oiled PR and propaganda media campaign with a psychological nudge unit to adapt and fine tune it along the way.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is launching a disease registry to track Americans with autism.
The National Institutes of Health is collecting private medical records from both federal and commercial databases for the purpose of studying autism NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said on Monday
Bhattacharya was a lead author of a serology study released in April 2020 that suggested that as many as 80,000 residents of Santa Clara County, California, might have already been infected with SARS-CoV-2.The study’s design, conduct, statistical analysis, and conclusions were widely criticized as flawed.
Bhattacharya is a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, a proposal arguing for an alternative public health approach to dealing with COVID-19 through “focused protection” of the people most at risk.
Amazing how the above shills appear via alt blogs then manage to make it to positions to then do the opposite.
“Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is launching a disease registry to track Americans with autism.”
At the same as he urges everyone to get their kids injected with the MMR muck.
These are triple antigens which even died in the wool vaccination believers used to warn about not injecting due to their potent, sometimes deadly side-effects.
That is why democracy doesnt work.
If the majority are brainwashed idiots the rest of us are goosed.
No one in our family will ever take another vaccine. We have researched, received FOI requests, met with honest pharma research scientists and know the true story behind the Andrew Wakefield debacle by the courts, government, big pharma and the Murdochs.
Geniuses can be brainwashed. Calling the victims of brainwashing ‘idiots’ is false and only obscures the brainwashers.
Brainwashed Conformists?
If a Genius is brainwashed. He may still be a Genius but also an idiot.
Then we need to redefine genius. Surely should be someone with the greatest awareness. Not just someone who can do certain things really well, many of those were useful idiots in the past.
And what form of government do you prefer, if not democracy? The ole “Republic” thing that we have going on now? Or perhaps a monarchy, like we almost have going on now?
All governments are corrupt and criminal. They get away with it because the majority of people are trusting and gullible and our media is also corrupt.
Here in the UK, our government reads off prepared scripts of questions and answers. They make policy but don’t create policy. In other words, they are not needed except in an illusion of democracy.
The City Bankers create policy and control everything which includes the Monarch. He is the second part of the illusion to give respectability.
The solution can only be that the people wake the fk up.
If the people woke the fuck up then maybe democracy would work. That’s the whole idea.
Even those on this forum are gullible.
I have explained the Legal Person concept umpteen times on OG. But it is criticised time after time. I can assure everyone reading this that we are controlled by means of ths fraud.
Understanding this is our get-out-of-jail card. The state, courts and police have no jurisdiction in statute law over any of us.
Nobody has a problem understanding the concept, at most we’ve asked you for examples where the concept has actually worked, and provided examples where it clearly doesn’t work.
Talk is cheap rickypop, provide examples where these legal concepts actually worked and you mite be taken more seriously.
I started a company taking on clients who had been charged by the police and were notified to come to court. Everyone who dared to stay the course was never penalised. Almost all were threatened with arrest. Those who went to court were penalised for their offence.
I only took on cases where there was no injured party.
Here is a standard court notification in Scotland:
MR JOE BLOGGS
Procurator Fiscal v YOU
Dear Sir
YOU did this. You did that
Signed Procurator Fiscal Depute
Joe Bloggs has never been notified to come to court.
So ImpObs, do you understand, or are you working from the other side?
Another client was a former Mr Universe who opened his Gym as a mental health retreat during Covid after 2 friends committed suicide; he was fined almost 80,000 pounds. We countered the claim using legal person fraud, and the charge was dropped.
MR JOE BLOGGS is a legal person to whom the Crown is trustee thereby responsible. If Joe responds and goes to court, he admits he is the legal person and accepts liability.
A bit of common sense and courage is all you need.
I am proof it works, for several years all that happens is the system posts BS letters to me, but nothing happens.
But why do you ask for proof? The proof is right here, are you MR IMPOBS? Or is that just a legal fiction?
They won’t believe because they don’t want to do anything about it. Keyboard warrior pussies, better than a libtard but only just.
Exactly it is literally THE easy way to freedom. Even my most awake friends won’t take action on it though. They just think I’m ‘lucky’ getting away with it, they don’t understand that when you stop fearing it cos you KNOW it’s fraud the system leaves you alone.
Oh, you mean a mockarny, (mocharny?) don’t you? Goes along fine with demonocracy, don’t you think?
I have researched information available about five brainwashed people: (1) Two weeks after his second jab, Prince Philip was admitted to Hospital after feeling unwell. Then a month after he underwent a procedure for a heart condition, he died. (2) After five jabs, the Queen died of Myeloma, a B-Cell Bone Marrow cancer. (3) After four jabs, Sarah, Duchess of York was diagnosed with breast cancer. Six months later she was diagnosed with melanoma, an aggressive malignant skin cancer. (4) After five jabs, Catherine, Princess of Wales, was diagnosed with cancer. (5) After five jabs, King Charles was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, with a life expectancy of two years.
What can I say?
First, it is so unlikely that any of them would have knowingly touched that muck with a bargepole.
If they were injected, it would have been with saline and a show just for the cameras, unless they were tricked into believing it was saline, in which case the controllers have decided that the monarchy has outlived its usefulness.
They may not be at the top of the tree but are sufficiently high up enough to see the forest and not just the tree trunks below.
There is no guarantee that any of ones currently alive are ill, let alone have cancer. Lizzie and Phil were hardly spring chickens when they croaked it, making it to 96 and 99 years old respectively
Was one of them ImpObs??
Even back is 1800s, they knew the entire vaccination programme was a sham and highlt dangerous:
Failure of vaccination : variolous infection an illusion : vaccination an injury to health and a danger to life, and as a protection against small-pox, a vanity
A few critics knew. Others believed the hype and/or enjoyed the profits.
‘The Story of a Great Delusion’ by William White was the best book I read about covid – and it was about smallpox but the playbook was virtually identical.
“The state cannot tell you what to think…” They’ll be rolling back on that in the not too distant future I’m sure.
Ahh but telling is simply giving an order. The other person still has choice to do it or not. So anyone can tell anyone anything. Whether that person does it or not is on them…
And what if the state (or any other institution) has misidentified ‘the public good’ to begin with? In that case, wouldn’t a dialectic of personal beliefs be the only way of ascertaining the truth of the matter?
IIRC, none other than John Stuart Mill himself once argued in favor of free speech/conscience precisely on such utilitarian grounds.
Without free speech, science and progress are crippled.
If you will promise that……
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/02/04/woke-ism-is-not-cultural-marxism/
“John Stuart Mill in On Liberty outlined the basic arguments for the liberal hope that freedom of discussion – that is, not eliminating the views of minorities – would lead to moral and scientific improvement. His great enemy was what he and Tocqueville called “the tyranny of the majority”. For centuries Liberalism has been opposed to the (unenlightened) majority and in favour of (enlightened) minorities. It is a form of aristocracy twisted to bring it into the democratic age. And surely this is at the intellectual root of Wokery. (And this is the case even though modern Social Justice Warriors are now a species of Liberal so sure of themselves that they feel entitled to suppress freedom of discussion.) All the modern intersectional obsessions – racism, anti-Semitism, empire, slavery, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, islamophobia, etc. – are, in the West at least, simply outgrowths of a Liberal inclination to side with minorities against the majority. The whole thing is more Liberal than Marxist, even if Marxists have come in afterwards to offer grand and dubious explanations for what is going on.”
What if vaccinations and public goods ARE personal beliefs….. or in this case manufactured group beliefs?
Yes, exactly! What is the ‘public good’, what it encompasses, and even whether such a thing exists is a matter of debate and the sort of one the political philosophers would have.
This shows a confusion in what is what in a society. I miss the government’s defense in this discussion. I miss an understanding that a government also have rights.
To understand the problem we need to understand both parties background. The government is painting with the big brush.
We ordinary citizens are painting with our tiny little self oriented brush and often wants the government to see only our little personal problem as something the government must resolve as its 1’st priority as our representative.
I dont see “government” as the problem. Only if the “government” is hijacked by for example the Bush family Oligarchs in the global oil industry, or some similar.
By understanding what a governments true function is, we also see more clearly whats wrong if it dysfunctions.
A government’s true function should be to disappear up its own fundament. Nothing more nor less.
Whatever.