A Memory Hole for Rothschild in Rio
Niall McCrae
World leaders gather for the UNCED summit, Rio de Janeiro 1992
It was perhaps the most significant event in his life. Yet the speech that launched the worldwide campaign against carbon dioxide, purportedly to save the planet from global warming, is missing from the speaker’s memoirs. And his eloquent appeal for action, at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, appears to be banned by YouTube and ‘memory-holed’ by Google.
What is there to hide?
Edmund de Rothschild, who died in 2009, is unusual for his family in having an autobiography published (A Gilt-Edged Life, 1998). Born in 1916, as a young boy he fished in the ponds at Gunnersbury, the mansion in Middlesex. By that time the surroundings had changed from wheat fields to residential sprawl, and when Edmund’s grandfather Leo died in 1917 and the property passed to his father Lionel, the latter agreed to sell the house and estate to the town councils of Acton and Ealing. In 1926 it reopened as a public park with and museum, the Rothschilds having built new mansions in Buckinghamshire.
The problem with memoirs is their selectiveness by the writer, with embarrassing incidents, arguments and extramarital affairs omitted. The oligarchy, particularly a globalist banker such as Edmund de Rothschild, has more to hide. He presents in the book as a highly cultured man with a passion for horticulture.
In 1975, when Edmund de Rothschild retired from the NM Rothschild bank, he attended a conference of the World Wilderness Leadership (in conjunction with the United Nations0 in Colorado. ‘I have also been interested in wider environmental problems, in particular pollution control’, he wrote.
Otherwise, his involvement in the climate crisis campaign is absent from the book. Isn’t that strange for an environmentalist?
The final chapter (‘Home Stretch’) implies an esteemed gentleman retreating to his home and garden, occasionally attending commemorations. In fact, he made the most impact in his seventies and eighties.
At the fourth World Wilderness Congress in 1987, he asserted that carbon dioxide is the cause of global warming, and that massive funds would be needed to ameliorate the effects. He suggested the World Conservation Bank for this reason. Money from the International Monetary Fund would be lent to the poorest countries, under guarantee of Western governments. The bank would designate wilderness areas with mineral riches as security.
De Rothschild succeeded in getting this huge financial and territorial scheme adopted as United Nations policy, through his acquaintance with Maurice Strong, a founding figure of climate catastrophism, at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit). His speech was later publicised by George Hunt, an environmental businessman who was horrified to see the summit dominated by global banking billionaires.
Strong introduced Edmund de Rothschild at Rio de Janeiro:
There is no better person to lead us in this dialogue, between growth and development forces on the one hand and conservation and ecology on the other, than Mr Edmund de Rothschild. I have known Mr. de Rothschild for many years. I have known him as one of the great financial / industrial leaders of our planet. One of the most innovative! He has always been out front. He has always been willing to see the larger issues, the larger projects of economic development….So there is no better person. He epitomizes in his own life that positive synthesis between environment and conservation on the one hand and economics on the other. And I’m just delighted of having this opportunity of introducing to you Edmund de Rothschild.’
The speech that followed seems unremarkable today to anyone alert to the misanthropic motives of climate alarm. There were ludicrous ideas, such as using carbon dioxide for dry ice to keep the North and South Poles frozen. More importantly de Rothschild told the gathered national leaders that they would be forever cursed if they failed to act –and that meant approving the charter needed for his conservation bank.
The blatant land grab was unchallenged by the assembled presidents and prime ministers. From then onwards, democratic governments were superseded by international treaties.
De Rothschild promised a second Marshall Plan for Third World debt relief. His bank has competed with China and Saudi Arabia to buy vast areas of farmland in developing countries. Now the globalists are reorganising agriculture at a grand scale, undermining subsistence livelihood and contributing to mass immigration to the West.
The new world order, planned for decades by the major banking dynasties and nameless others, could only be created by smashing the existing culture and economy. The Rothschild family have been instrumental as financiers of this prescribed tumult.
In 1994 Edmund de Rothschild attended ‘the 250th anniversary of the birth of my great-great-great grandfather Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the Frankfurt banker and father of NM Rothschild and his four brothers. Frankfurt’s city authorities decided that to mark the anniversaries they would like to honour the Rothschilds, and consequently nearly a hundred members of the family assembled there.’
Interestingly, Frankfurt was not only the birthplace of global banking but also of radical social engineering. The phrase ‘Cultural Marxism’ (meaning the Frankfurt School’s change from Karl Marx’s emphasis on economic revolution to a gradual onslaught on culture) is as verboten as the Rothschilds in contemporary and historical discourse.
Consider the book Who Rules the World? (2016) by the famed neo-Marxist professor Noam Chomsky. Endorsed on the cover as ‘the world’s greatest public intellectual’ (Guardian), and Owen Jones pronouncing him as ‘a giant’, Chomsky is deemed an authority on how the world is really run, and by whom. A cursory glance at the index, however, indicates some blind spots.
How many entries do you think such a book would have for the following?
- The Rockefellers
- Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum
- BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street
- The Rothschilds
- Bill Gates
- George Soros
The answer is Net Zero!
The only financier found in my index search was Goldman Sachs, but that was merely an aside buried in the text. So who does Chomsky believe holds the reins of power?
He justifiably points his finger at greedy corporate capitalism and the US government for abuses at home and abroad, while also railing against far-right populists. But he fails to see the climate crisis as a scam of massive redistribution of wealth from the lower and middle classes to the predatory elite.
Money makes the world go round, and Edmund de Rothschild’s legacy is the monetising and rationing of every resource, from fuel to water. Why would Chomsky overlook the Rothschilds and Rockefellers? Perhaps it was a publisher’s edit. Note, however, that Chomsky urged incarceration of anyone refusing the Covid-19 vaccine.
The reason for YouTube censorship, Edmund de Rothschild’s dubious modesty and Chomsky missing the elephant in the room, is that the powers-that-be don’t want us knowing too much.
Therefore, it is not only contrary opinion and truths that are suppressed, but also the utterances of powerful people, if they reveal the misanthropic motives of climate alarm.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Rothschild according to google AI says another story.
Naomi Wolf on Trump/Epstein:
https://substack.com/home/post/p-168516979
It’s all the liberal elite? Gotta keep that left/right paradigm going! It is, in its way, as bad as the liberal media like the Fraudian who’ve suddenly discovered Epstein now that he’s a stick with which to bash Trump after having ignored Epstein for over a decade while posing as upholders of women. It might also be noticed how she excuses “scientists”.
Why does she take this line? Why did she also uphold the “lab leak” theory and start hating on China? Perhaps there’s a clue in the article:
“My husband, a truly objective man (as well as an ardent President Trump supporter who also worked for numerous intelligence agencies for almost three decades)”.
I could never understand her China hate either. The Breggman’s are the same.
I mean look around your house, guys – what isn’t made in China?
Yes, her China blame always brought me up short.
100 years ago it was what wasn’t made of china.
At least the Guardian has mentioned Epstein.
This blog has newsblack it out and bashed the left with out of date 900years old Chomski and Owen Jones diversion article.
We hate china because they stole our freedom! US had a certain freedom ratio from Easy Rider in 1969 say 80% freedom and China had Mao red slavery say 20% freedom same year.
Today it is opposite. Chinese drive around on 1500 cubic and US have running wheels.
Nobody noticed this change, suddenly it was there:
Now to US today:
Meaning they stole 60% of our freedom behind the curtains without saying anything to us about it, slowly since 1969 up to day’s date! 20/80. This is why we hate China. Bastards.
Low hanging fruits like owen jones
seriously.
For the record, this clip from Spitting Image dates back to 1989!
https://x.com/i/status/1941348621770949072
Chomsky has never been a Marxist, he has always defined himself as an anarchist, just read the things he writes. He is against Marxism.
Anarchism is the brother of Marxism. It became a bastard at the time of the First International (1864-1876) when the Hague Congress of 1872 formalized the factional “schism” between the brothers. Bakunin lost in favor of Marx. Developments over time show that communism’s gray eminences did not neglect anarchism. History records, for example, the deeds of the red hordes – Anarchists and Bolsheviks – during the Spanish Civil War. committed by the Red hordes – Anarchists and Bolsheviks – during the Spanish Civil War. The desecration of Christian graves remains emblematic.
Anarchism is hated by authoritarians of any ideology, “communist” or capitalsit, because it is anti-authoritarian. After WW1, the West, capitalism, was so threatened by the revolution in Russian that they sent in troops in a WW1b to DISRUPT any democratic socialism from forming. Communism, Socialism, or Capitalism without a form of Direct Democracy authorizing it’s legitimacy, is merely forms of cloaked or uncloaked totalitarianism. Like we have everywhere over Earth now. Capitalism clings to violent authority and wealth to assure it’s continued rule. Anarchism is the antithesis to authoritarianism of any kind and trying to spin it otherwise is the work of system psyops. Anarchist do recognize valid Marxian critiques of the dysfunctional nature of capitalist society, just the Situationists do. That does mean they have ANY of the same objectives as those dogmatic people in the 21st C that call themselves communists. Marx wrote in the 1800’s and lots of conditions and paradigms have changed since then and do not pertain as much as in the Gilded Age thru the 70’s. Anarchism has the technology to enable consent based self organization which is where humanity should be headed.
Anarchism is satanism in pure form. Just read Bakunin praising …lucifer. I know very well that the West is full of “useful intellectuals” who give lessons about “true communism” or “the virtues of anarchism” even to those who were born and raised in ex-communist Eastern Europe! Communism and Anarchism are aborted on Earth by the same drunken and syphilitic mother. The two abortionists – Communism and Anarchism – are the mortal enemies of nations, of nationalism. Capitalism? There’s no such thing anymore. Now we’re heading towards Tehno-Feudalism, and the Communists and Anarchists are smoothing the way!
Totally ludicrous! That first sentence is classic capitalist hater religiosity that drives Western military empire. Bakunin is not anarchism. He is but one among many advocates speaking their own mind. For me, what he said is equally ludicrous and dismissable. What is not dismissable is anti-authoritarianism and self-organizing within consent based decision making. This is direct democracy and even though many anarchists claim to distrust democracy, consent can only be employed through a personal vote within a live human collective. No matter what words one wants to use. Ideologies are the ultimate evil and they are deployed to produce dogmatic dupes aimed at the “enemy” like missiles.
Really? Here, Bakunin praises satan (God and the State):
“But here steps in satan, the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge”.
Anarchism wants the annihilation of nation, of countries, of private property. Anarchism is the flattening of humanity and the establishment of the global kolkhoz.
Yes, I do think Bakunin’s theology is mistaken. However, it represents a small part of his overall writing on anarchy. Anarchy basically means the absence of IMPOSED order and follows natural law
So-called Bakunin’s theology is pure satanism wrapped in Atheism. It says everything about this human scum, but also about his followers. Anarchy is the enemy of the nation, of statehood. What “natural law” is it that wants to turn the world into a global kolkhoz? Let’s not forget, in addition, anarchists are against the natural family formed by woman and man, pushing the infamous trans-lgbtq agenda. This is another act of war that will no doubt be responded to.
Plato’s City States might be a good option to our present centralized governments
Plato was utopian. A dreamer. More interesting was Thucydides who realistically described the city states. But yes, I can respect the city-state if it is Rome – the Eternal City and Constantinople – the City of Cities.
Your comments are not without substance and interest.
But to claim your are better than Plato who “are only an utopian” while you are a gooddie goodier whose double brain and double intelligence can only be satisfied with a cities like Rome, is a little overexaggerated if you will please allow me to say so…… 😑 .
It wasn’t about me. I was giving the example of Thucydides who was much more interesting. Ha ha ‘Alas poor Erik’ … why don’t you want to understand that I am modest, that I am content with the possessions of the Roman world represented at the command level by Rome and Constantinople?
Thucydides was a greedy selfish a-‘ol, which Plato clearly presents. You’re clearly in the club.
Thucydides was a historian, military, and politician. He was an author who left the world the ‘History of the Peloponnesian War’. He is recognized as one of the greatest historians of all time. Selfish? Why? Because he served Athens?
Ideologues do not respond to what is said and skip back to repeat the same ludicrous claims dismissed by the response. Anarchism wants consent and no authoritarian dictates, that is all. Wail into the wind all you want. You are totally out of your lane.
Anarchism means betrayal of the nation, the country and the heritage you were born into. Only wanderers can consent to that.
Operation… GLADIO…
LOL … Baader-Meinhof
The “useful intellectuals” as you politely call them, can always find an excuse for their romantic theories of who always end up in mass death.
Yes, I was trying to be polite. But you understood the subsidiary meaning. I don’t think I’m exaggerating if I say that a ‘romantic theory’ of those ‘intellectuals’ founded the ‘magic’ serum vaccination and imposed the vaccination passports and the WHO Pandemic Treaty.
For what its worth, according to Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair), Spanish anarchists allied with communists to fight the fascists while Britain and France remained appeasingly “neutral”. According to the auto-biographical account of his participation in the conflict siding with the anarchists, the communists were dubiously regarded.
Faced with redistribution of church land holdings and disenfranchisement from political influence, Catholic Spain sided with the fascists. “Desecration” is likely church propaganda describing the redistribution of church land where many cemeteries were maintained.
Truth be told, the two great “isms” – capitalism and communism – both maintain fierce authoritarian characteristics; the former under the auspice of private wealth-dominated ownership, the latter under pretext of collective readily-corruptible bureaucratic ownership.
The third, emergent “ism”, under whose ideological tenet I would place “technocracy”, is fascism – a blend of authoritarian capitalism and authoritarian communism.
What does my comment amount to? Nothing. Its all statism to me – corruptible and exploitative.
Catholic, Christian Spain did not join the fascists. It joined the nationalists led by Generalissimo Franco. Here’s an example of Anarcho-Bolshevik “bravery”
About fascism, here’s what Paul Goma (Red Week), a real dissident, about whom the West knows nothing:
“Fascism is the Russianized form of the Italian ‘fascismo’, from ‘fascia’, a bundle of wicker with an axe, a Roman lictor’s insignia that became the emblem of Mussolini’s socialist party P.N.F. Fascist was forged into French by Kominformist propagandists, including the inevitable Ilia Ehrenburg – but also Valter Roman (Erno Neulander) – and pasted … to Franco’s nationalists in 1936. Having entered the Russian language as a neologism, it became in Soviet parlance a generic, insulting-mysterious – and convenient – epithet: it required no more sustained intellectual effort than a burp, than a spit. Returned to the West, in the form of a linguistic and logical monster; remained in the USSR and Russian-occupied countries, where it became, not merely an easy label – out of laziness – attracting (serious) accusations and prison sentences”.
The Nationalists were referred to by the other side as fascists. The other side were known as the Republicans or communists. Franco was considered a fascist by the Republicans.
Today still in Spain the terms fascist and communist are thrown around in common parlance in reference to the Civil War.
Those who families fought on the Republican side or who remember the war as children and are Republicans also refer to themselves as communists. Meanwhile, those today whoses families supported Franco and the Nationalists do not refer to themselves as fascists, that is an insult thrown at them by modern day socialists/communists and old school Republicans/communists.
Yes, it’s the perpetuation of the ‘fascist’ label applied by the anarcho-Bolshevik team and their followers in the West. Indeed, the ‘fascist’ label is an insult to Franco supporters. But it’s not just about Spain of yesterday and today. What is not to the liking of the current Euro-thehno-feudal order is labeled as ‘fascism’.
In another way … Ursula speaks excellent English! Watch this, it deserves your attention.
https://www.tiktok.com/@antisistem01/video/7508814805977861398
Hardly. Franco enjoyed 30+ years of dictatorship. Would he have objected to the ‘fascist’ label himself? Seems unlikely.
Either way, he lived in the era of dictators. Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini being contemporaries. The 20th century by any other name.
The lessons of that time for posterity yet to be learned. Or never learned as seems more to be the case
Franco and his comrades were fighting for nationalist Spain. He saved the country from the anarcho-Bolshevik hordes. He prevented the establishment of communism in the West. Eternal shame on those who watched impassively the desecration of his tomb in the Valle de los Caidos. Today’s inepts, injected with cultural Marxism and other antinational poisons, are ‘tabula rasa’ and maneuvering table for the European Commission which, among other things, dreams of the European superstate, the European gulag.
But, for what they believe, the fight goes on, until the end of the world.
Franco disposed of the nationalist Government for his own self-interests. Which is hardly fighting for their cause.
And it was Stalin who prevented the establishment of Communism in Spain by withdrawing his support at a strategic point (as part of his being an ‘ally’ of the West in WWII). Which was the premise behind “Homage to Catalonia”.
And the same joke was told about Franco when he died as with Stalin (though who claims prior precedence I don’t know). That millions went to their funerals not to mourn, but just to check that that they really were dead, so that life could begin again.
Such is the real legacy of the dictator
Franco’s life was dedicated to the nationalist cause. He served the cause of Christian and nationalist Spain. Stalin’s actions had nothing to do with preventing the spread of communism in Spain. Stalin was at war with the Trotskyist faction. That’s the key. What ‘alliance’ with the West? That came later, before it was the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact. About Stalin’s death … today
https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2025/06/09/the-tributes-of-half-men-en
Brilliant.
To emphasize Russia’s ancient genetic lust for Dictatorship, Mass murder and Killings of dissidents, read from the same reliable European based media:
https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2025/07/20/one-dead-as-russia-launches-overnight-drone-attacks-across-ukraine-en-news .
“A comprehensive Russian drone attack at night on Ukraine yesterday killed an 78 old lady and wounded one more pensioner.”
Proved: Russia has NO empathy for ordinary human lives as we have in West where every single human matter!
I agree with what you said. Indeed, in Russia empathy for ordinary people is a rare flower. But you still haven’t realized that the West has been doing the same as in Russia for some time. Think of the ‘plandemic’ disaster. East and West, two sides of the same coin.
When they lie so openly lie about Russia in the media, they leave only space for cartoon comments because it is too embarrassing to comment in a serious manner.
But I did get that out of it, that Russia’s agenda with the long war is to obstruct any future dreams of Western invasions…..for decades.
I saw an interview, first Russia thought it was the Commie ideology and therefore they tried to Westernize.
But they discovered West doesnt care, and will always only pursue their ancient dream of lay Russia in rubble.
Therefore they now know what to do.
It’s more complicated. Western invasion of Russia is largely illusory. The classic invasion can’t happen. For one thing, the West isn’t prepared to accept many casualties. Secondly, the armies of the west have had serious problems because of ‘political correctness’, DEI and other woke nonsense imposed by their own traitor politicians. The quality of the military has declined, and national fiber has diminished. This happened because of the desire to flatten the European nations and create the United States of Europe. Russia did not want to westernize, for example Gorby dreamed of “EURSS”. After ’89 Russia’s problems were primarily created by its own system including the politruk, the intelligence services and the military. Immediately the oligarchs appeared, did they rise from the sea foam like the goddess Aphrodite? Wasn’t the kgb owned by the establishment people who allowed, for example, the Rotemberg brothers to be what they are, i.e. oligarchs and interfaces with the Western establishment and America? Otherwise, Peter Lucinschi in ’89 was 2nd secretary of the Communist Party of the USSR in Tajikistan. He brags that he became a freemason before ’89.
Interesting video.
We all know, or should know, who led and filled the Bolsheviks most senior ranks and Commissar levels.
Also managed to get Germans and Russians to hate and kill each other.
Bingo!
Absolutely. If Europe is Talmud as she says, then I understand a whole lot more why things are insane in the whole of Europe.
Maybe not on the pecuniar level but on the mental, ideological and morally level.
While I don’t agree with Chomsky’s opinions on Israel/Palestine and the LOCKDOWN, his bigger picture critique of the nature of political “power”, authority-to-decide, being held by American elites executing global empire, is of the highest value. His 2017 “Who Rules the World” is about American “power”, not about global Banksters efforts as a deeper, deep state ruling the world. And imho, he’s more on target of the real addressable problem than picking out obvious historical targets like the Rothschild’s and the global rich as the root enemy. Chomsky’s quote below presents his most important point:
The population generally has little understanding of what is happening in the world. And they’re not told about it. So if people have power and privilege, why should they care? They don’t have to. The task of those who are trying to create a more just and equitable world is to overcome that alienation and detachment and to find the means to get people more engaged and involved in the issues that directly affect their lives.
https://digitalblackboard.io/reviews/government-politics/who-rules-the-world/
Imo, the truth can be described in the following analogy. The Banksters, including the Rothschilds, BlackRocks and others, can be compared to Gollums that are allowed to roam the world being ruthlessly greedy at the expense of the 99%, while the real active Sauron character, to keep it all in play, is US Empire. The Banksters provide economic support, but the ruthless killing & maiming machine of acquisition, terror and exploitation is the US hegemon deploying it’s military, it’s countless CIA+ spies, State Dept, homeland Police States, aided by corporate deployed mercenary warriors in every sector of domestic and foreign societies. Since US Empire frauds as representative democracy, it is much more purposeful to realize Sauron is much more accessible to initial revocation that then will lead to Bankster revocation. Public consciousness and solidarity to action is the true solution, imo.
It seems we are being misdirected back into a Neo McCarthy Era lose-lose situation of railing against Banksters being communists when we should continue to have our eyes on the true evil: US government as predatory.
Good points.
Yes, but they’re not independent entities. The banksters established the US hegemon and use it as a vehicle of violence and exploitation for their own benefit.
RE: The task of those who are trying to create a more just and equitable world is to overcome that alienation and detachment and to find the means to get people more engaged and involved in the issues that directly affect their lives.
I get that this is taken out of context and yet it seems to me to characterize NC’s anodyne “radical” bona fides. Note how vague it is, how little it actually says. It’s very appealing at an emotional level; how could you not want that? He doesn’t get into how or the means by which people “create a more just and equitable world.” We need to “overcome that alienation and detachment”? Sure, but that doesn’t seem like ideas around which one builds a movement able to do anything. It all seems wishy washy to me. It’s radicalism for liberals.
Now compare that to the concept of the dictatorship of the proletariat where the proletariat (that is, the working class, the large majority of the population) is raised to the position of the ruling class, where bourgeoisie are excluded from making the decisions of society (because they cannot be trusted, that’s why it’s a dictatorship and not a democracy – in a bourgeois democracy you have democracy for the capitalist ruling class, nobody else.)
In other words we already have (and have been living for centuries under) a dictatorship of bourgeoisie, aka, liberal democracy.
Fine comment. But, considering the US Independence Declaration in 1779 which is with good reason admired in many countries, US, factually, revolted against the British King and its100% tyranny.
Have they just kicked their Constitution and Independence out, and taking over the same bad Empire habits from UK?
It seems a system of ruling class crime bosses with sometimes conflicting, other times compatible interests for controlling resources of wealth and power, requiring purposeful resistance to take account of all variables of the organized crime network for social revolution beyond class rule. Short of revolution releasing us from enslavement to global financial capital, the US imperial state, like all other modern nation-states under the heel of ‘globalization’, is in irreversible debt bondage, such that it serves globo-cap as globo-cop.
The history of the US largely has been defined by struggle over sovereignty vis-a-vis central banking, from its war of independence from British empire including the Bank of England’s control and its civil war taking the rule of debt creation from war to its logical conclusion of capture by usury*, to the 1913 coup by banksters with creation of the U$ Fed and early 1970s’ post-Bretton Woods emergence of neoliberal class war upon national economies.
*Lincoln, who opposed the money lenders, was assassinated soon after making this statement: “The government should create, issue and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity.”
I forgot to add that the covid coup, if not climate change con, demonstrates the power of the banksters to subject humanity to their machinations, notwithstanding fake populism of MAGA Man and tech broligarchs carrying on the campaign to permanently lock us down in a digital dungeon of social credit.
Still, implementation of such must be done by an elite of politicians comprising government with many other inputs from elites from all sectors. As someone has said, the entirety is the deep state. It’s an elite collective management representing themselves only.
Gladio comes to mind. Its probably worldwide today.
Globo-cop for globo-cap,* deep state, organized crime system under the rule of law, etc.
*
“The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist — McDonald’s cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the builder of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley’s technologies is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.” (Thomas Friedman)
“The Global Financial Supermarket”. Sweeping Deregulation of the US Banking System. Michel Chossudovsky
You are right. Its a strangulation from within, and same usury concept everywhere.
So now we know the enemy, what do we do about it?
As I have already said: Hitler is still still alive and live in the same underground bunker on Antarctic as Elvis. So dont say Papa here never arrived with a solution.
What does the Bible tells us?
“Look, I come like a thief! Blessed is the one who stays awake and remains clothed, so as not to go naked and be shamefully exposed.” – Revelation 16:15 – Awareness!
“Therefore keep watch, because you do not know the day or the hour.” – Matthew 25:13
“It is crucial to understand that Armageddon represents the final confrontation between good and evil. This battle is more than a physical conflict; it embodies a profound spiritual clash.“
“Therefore, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one.” – Ephesians 6:16
“Blessed is the one who perseveres under trial (covid,clima,usury),m.m because, having stood the test, that person will receive the crown of life that the Lord has promised to those who love him.” – James 1:12 – Faith,
Awareness and faith in the truth that the good side will win in the end. THAT is the solution!
Pending
Off topic but I was recently arm wrestled into watching “Adolescence” and the opening was utterly ludicrous. Granted that we find out the police have video footage of the killing and know the boy is guilty and granted the desire for a dramatic opening, it nevertheless seems ridiculous that his arrest follows a military style attack on his house with a dozen or so police heavies. What were they worried about? That the boy might have been hiding a machine gun under his bed? The whole operation was gratuitous and counterproductive- unless of course it was all about sending an intimidating message to the public and suggesting that we are now in a police state.
I am not into details with the boy. But a person who have killed someone, are mentally capable of killing more people.
Police officers die in their service from attacks from precisely violent or armed criminals!
If there is a change the suspect can be armed, it is therefore normal to protect the Police by heavy gear and personal to leave any risk out.
Riddle me this:
If it’s all a “Worldwide Zionist conspiracy” why is islam allowed such dominance ?
Zionism needs a boogie-man against which to rally the voters of the West.
Exactly. You’d hardly think it needed saying.
Disappointing that commenters on this site seem to have so much affinity for islam.
It really is not the direction that citizens of this planet need to adopt in order to move forward.
I have made valid critisisms of the faith on this site and have been met with hostility when only stating facts.
Are you assuming criticism of zionism means support for islam? Kind of like those that think criticism of Trump must mean you’re a liberal, democrat, Biden supporter?
No.
Not at all.
I’m saying that criticism of islam on this site is severely criticised, I won’t say censored, in a way that no other subject is.
It just seens weird to me when seemingly otherwise intelligent people won’t accept that islam has huge problems witth it’s ideology and ambitions.
Criticism of Islam is irrelevant. This has never been about Islam. Al Qaeda, ISIS, Hamas – all Western sock puppets.
Irrelevant or inconvenient ?
Deliberately obfuscatory.
Listen. Its a disgusting issue. I have close friends who use the Islam boogie man to get admired and respected as a better person than them.
It is pure ugly racism especially if you know the background.
Before 9/11 Moslems were respected in London as trustworthy persons because they had an honour code jrf their religion, and because they dont used interests on loans as a certain other tribe do.
After 9/11 everybody think all Moslems are like ISIS, Al Qaida, m.m. who Western paid terror groups.
Thats why we cannot back up and give you the usual points you get in illiterate groupings.
Pending
Jesus is seriously censored on the site, so is the religion causing the wars and they off-barking blame the left wing bankers.
abracadabra_abrhamic sky warshippers is the most causes of problems in the world today.
I feel I xould criticise Jesus and Judaism on this site without a problem. Many do.
pending too
Get 3 thumbs down for asking a simple question. Some real assholes visit this place.
Get hurt by red arrows ?
Maybe this isn’t the place for you ?
Who said I was hurt. Just railing against assholes. That doesn’t mean I’m hurt. Grow the fuck up.
Pointing out what is does not mean having an affinity for it.
Oh don’t be so cute. Islam has been the designated bogey man since the utterly phoney theatre of 9/11. The actual religion of Islam is irrelevant. Cue the eternal demonisation via whatever quotes you want from the Koran. Meanwhile in the real world the vile nauseating Zionist hypocrites get to bomb whoever they want by building up the phoney enemies they need to whine about their victimhood.
But it’s not a bogey man is it ?
It’s an existential threst to the European way of life.
It will dominate Europe in this century simply by breeding itself into a prominant position.
I have never said I support Zionism but to deny that islam is a problem is foolish.
In the extreme.
Fuck this rhetoric is so boring.
The European way of life is a threat to the Eurpean way of life. The whole shitty system is coming crashing down and in need of a radical (and if you like “existential”) re-jig to keep the parasite class going. Meanwhile let’s manufacture another pathetic bogey man to keep the punters distractedly fuming at the commies/kligons/xenomorphs or indeed those magical Arab magicians.
And that’s easy to do since the palpably psychotic Zionists base their entire wretched existence on bleating about being victimised by phony enemies.
Ignore the islamic threat at your peril.
It IS an existential threat to my my way of life – and yours.
Religeous equivalence is a very dangerous concept.
All religions are NOT the same.
Sorry, you can’t brush this under the carpet.
Can’t tell if you are serious, or just seriously deluded.
MI6, the CIA and other 3 letter agencies are more of a threat to the “ordinary” mans way of life than some ragheads.
Because the pope fucking children (i have the footage) is ok, innit?
Oh, I’m serious.
Ok you are serious. Examples???
Dont be so stupid to show us what ISIS, Al Qaida, Al Nusra, m m. they have done. “they did 9/11” not.
Real life examples?
MI6, the CIA and other 3 letter agencies are the ragheads.
Repeat and fade. Of course I’m being optimistic. Repeat and get louder.
The existential threat comes from corporations: they’re the ones that have stripped the high-streets of the UK, removed any useful industrial practice, inserted harmful media and entertainment entities throughout society, are currently constructing a digital-control grid full of energy- and water-hungry data-centres and ‘supercomputers’ etc. I’m not sure many of these (if any?) are of Islamic origin?
The ‘religious’ theatre that occupies our streets/minds is distraction from the above for a large proportion of society.
do you mean like by staying at home, protecting the NHS and saving lives or celebrating poppy day or paying more tax for more missiles to send to Ukraine (RTX Corporation Stock Analysis and Forecast – Consistently exceptional gains) or something.
What I find strange is that anyone who is not of one of those two faiths feels the need to support either. Picking a side makes no sense, where the smallest one is well over represented in positions of influence and control and the other one is well protected in the West and has a couple of billion adherents worldwide including wealthy so-called nations. These two groups can look after themselves. In fact they have more similarities than differences.
They don’t need any help and certainly are not going to help what are notionally called, even if not practising, Christians.
The consumerist West where materialism has replaced religion or any form of spirtuality except the New Age psyop has resulted in a moral decay. I am not suggesting Christianity should make a comeback, however since nature abhors a vacuum, the controllers have found a demographic weapon using a large practising religious group to fill it.
Meanwhile European culture, traditions and heritage are being consigned to history. A demoralisation agenda.
Has there ever been a group of people so willing to commit cultural suicide and through self-loathing, indoctrinated into them, favour other ethnic or religious groups over their own?
The absolute definition of stupidity and a case of Darwinism in action.
Couldn’t agree more.
Pure demographics are dooming the life we had from the 50’s to the 90’s and, no, that’s not teary nostalgia.
My question to TBTB is, as per my originsl question, why chose this way ?
Once islam is installled it ain’t gonna be easy to wrest back control.
Or perhaps the economic process renders all religion and culture irrelevant. Except of course as splendid grand guignols for the punters. Kind of like watching Squid Game.
How is Zionism going to reclaim the lands taken by islam once islam has become dominant ?
By bombs. Islam has no serious bombs. It is that easy man!
Really ???
No not really. Fucking obviously.
The three principles of Zionism. Pay close attention to the second:
https://youtube.com/shorts/9AhOcr-Sa9k?si=JyxAcCnReceeCZHs
You asked me not to quote from the koran so I won’t
But you will be aware that thete are some choice descriptions of non-muslims that I could – “cherry-pick” should i wish to which are far worse than your Yt example.
Except that this “cherry picking” outlines a patently obvious psychopathic genocide unfolding before our very eyes and from a bunch of rapacious gangsters with endless funds from the West.
And the three principles of Zionism are “cherry picking”? They are the whole of Zionism. Without their claims of victimhood status they are nothing.
I don’t disagree.
You asked me not to quote from the koran, so I didn’t.
My point was that I could find you some pretty damning lines from it but you would accuse me of cherry- picking.
You already know the verses anyway.
A masterpiece of irrelevance. Still if you “don’t disagree” there must be something happening.
George, I’m not disagreeing with you on your Zionist position.
But if you HAD to chose one place to live
Riyadh or Tel Aviv ?
I don’t think Tel Aviv has much of a future. And what this genocide proves is that the Israelis have been living under their very own mind fuck programme for decades. This is deliberately incubated psychopathy. Still, as long as you can watch porn and drink Coca Cola.
And wasn’t Saudi Arabia our good pals? Afghanistan was a secular society until the US funded the Mujahideen. These utterly evil Islamic bastards are a good business deal for us. Israel owes so much to them. How else would the Zionists get away with restaging Nazi Germany for the entertainment of the poor misunderstood Israeli public?
I don’t think Tel Aviv has much of a future. And what this genocide proves is that the Israelis have been living under their very own mind fuck programme for decades. This is deliberately incubated psychopathy. Still, as long as you can watch porn and drink Coca Cola.
And wasn’t Saudi Arabia our good pals? Afghanistan was a secular society until the US funded the Mujahideen. These utterly evil Islamic bastards are a good business deal for us. Israel owes so much to them. How else would the Zionists get away with restaging Nazi Germany for the entertainment of the poor misunderstood Israeli public?
Regarding Afghanistan in the late 70s:
https://www.michael-parenti.org/article-afghanistan-another-untold-story
Emphasis added.
“….a Marxist-led coalition of national democratic forces came into office. “It was a totally indigenous happening. Not even the CIA blamed the USSR for it,” writes John Ryan, a retired professor at the University of Winnipeg, who was conducting an agricultural research project in Afghanistan at about that time.
The Taraki government proceeded to legalize labor unions, and set up a minimum wage, a progressive income tax, a literacy campaign, and programs that gave ordinary people greater access to health care, housing, and public sanitation. Fledgling peasant cooperatives were started and price reductions on some key foods were imposed.
The government also continued a campaign begun by the king to emancipate women from their age-old tribal bondage. It provided public education for girls and for the children of various tribes.….
But serious opposition arose from several quarters. The feudal landlords opposed the land reform program that infringed on their holdings. And tribesmen and fundamentalist mullahs vehemently opposed the government’s dedication to gender equality and the education of women and children.
Because of its egalitarian and collectivist economic policies the Taraki government also incurred the opposition of the US national security state. Almost immediately after the PDP coalition came to power, the CIA, assisted by Saudi and Pakistani military, launched a large scale intervention into Afghanistan on the side of the ousted feudal lords, reactionary tribal chieftains, mullahs, and opium traffickers.”
Furthermore (emphasis in original)
“It should be noted that all this happened before the Soviet military intervention.”
It is a little depressing to realize time and time and time again that WE are the bad guys.
I think of myself as a very good person, I could never have done that for money. meaning something in this story doesn’t hold up water.
If I compare myself with what happen globally where I am involved, it could not have happened THAT way.
Maybe another way, but not that way!.
It wasn’t a flippant comment.
It was a serious question.
Suggesting that islam is a bogey-man for zionism is vastly underestimating the islamic faith.
Once ground is gained it is never considered as non-islamic.
Andalucia, for example.
You Christian?
C of E if I had to choose.
I’m not banging a drum for any religion but I am pointing out that islam will be a huge problem in the “West” if we allow it the expansion it wants.
“if i had to choose”
No virgins for you, mate.
Oh, cripes !
Didn’t they get the translation wrong ?
I think it means “72 grapes”
Oh, well, they can make some wine I suppose…….oh, wait…
Jaysus,
another Amalek / tenth plague without blemish suckling killer lova.
The Light Bringer ain’t no match for that Angel of Death.
Religion is nearly as childish as Nationalism.
To divide and conquer the Goym.
Gotta disagree with the first sentence Niall: ‘the most significant event in his Life’ was undoubtedly his final breath.
Ditto all of us.
So you think someone’s final breath is more significant than their first?
That’s an odd way of looking at life.
You will (as I’ve said many a time, but you seem to be closed-minded on this) one day discover that after your ‘final breath’ you will most definitely still exist: in your very real spirit body form. You will discover that you do still exist, in the very real Spirit dimension of this multidimensional cosmos.
No matter HOW closed-minded you are, on this, you will one day discover, and thus have to face, that what I said was the truth. I am NOT “sullying the truth” (as you oh so incorrectly [and ironically…] claimed to me, some months ago) by stating the absolute factual truth that we do all survive the death of our physical body ‘coat’. Consciousness, Johnny, is NOT “merely a by-product of the physical brain”; it operates/manifests through the brain, yes, but it (consciousness) is NOT created by the brain.
Almost right, its created by a big computer.
You’re welcome!
I just knew that murdering b’stard was a liar when IT said IT had made an appointment for me to die.
Does Allah have the same type of setup.
Can’t trust voken anything.
They all believe in heaven.
especially the weirdo belows
Pending translates to scary comment and scary words alert and need approving from the 😂 lower up’s.
How many entries do you think such a book would have for the following?
The answer is Net Zero!
A vintage 1930s mythos which ceaselessly chants, “Bank-of-England-bad, Rothschilds-worse,” with the persistence of a parrot. Inside the confines of this repetitious cartoon one sees and hears virtually nothing about Medici, Fugger, Funk, Schacht, von Krosig, et al.
Only the woke right would even think Schwab that appeared into the alt MSM plus mindset during covid.
WEF another appeared during cvoid to become the scapegoat.
BlackRock, Vanguard, that viral video appeared during covid. remind the woke right that
all the other families and royal houses must of all of them disappeared did they? fools.
Bill Gates is the woke right TV msm+puppeteer sold to alt media MSM + like Matt Hancock to scream and shout at.
George Soros LOL TV created loneman gun pasty sold to the woke right to scream at,
The above OverDose article thinking it is hip and trendy and clever show how mindcontrol they also is. Thats is the deepest you may go?
Niall McCrae is another OD patsy to fake pretend to make the site sound clever throw in 98 years Chomsky when in fact it is just woke as woke left.
The difference and big difference is Your shilling when Owen jones is naive. come on mr editor of OG where is the articles on Fugee’s Mancini, theses famous houses / family bloodlines from before haven’t packed up and disappeared .
Bill gates is a patsy.
He isnt the biggest farm owner even the idiots in the E.u no the queen and Vatican where the biggest land owners and they was in bed with the different royal houses.
So the royal houses – banking dynasty family’s of Italy & Europe disappeared did they and in 2020 BlackRock, Vanguard viral video appeared?
So the banking dynasty family’s of America disappeared did they.?
And dissolved and all that wealth just gone.
The 2020 reset actually reset a lot of peoples minds LIKE YOU.
The persistent attempt to revive the meme which scapegoats the Rothschilds for all (or most) of what is wrong with money and finance, is a function of the sub-rosa conspiracy Pound missed—
Rome’s papalist banking houses which instituted the empire of usury centuries before the Bank of England sprang to light.
Summoning the decrepit stereotype of Rothschilds as having the original monopoly on money manipulation from which all other financial gangsterism arises, without seeing beyond this myopic mania from bygone days, causes us to fail to spot the forces behind the induction of the misdirection — the sucker bait that makes mainly Judaic banking houses the principal financial villain of early modern history while insulating papalist and Third Reich usury cartels from scrutiny.
When in the Europe of the past the Rothschilds were indigent strivers struggling to pull themselves up from poverty, in Italy the Medici and Strozzi dynasties, and in Germany the Fugger banking house, were imposing the usury curse on Christendom with the blessing of the pope. This wreckage commenced with Leo X in May of 1515 and was fully unleashed, without a modicum of restriction, 300 years later, by Pius VIII.#
You can tell that as it done everything shilly to avoid discussing Epstein by throwing in some shit low IQ articles discussing the left, again and again and again.
You just embarrassed your selves again!
This was all done in the name under religion. Which you will never ever mention as you get paid by it to shekel shill the above shit deflection article/s and the naive viewers lick it up as they all suffer from jerusalem syndrome.
A vintage 1930s mythos which ceaselessly chants, “Bank-of-England-bad, Rothschilds-worse,” with the persistence of a parrot. Inside the confines of this repetitious cartoon one sees and hears virtually nothing about Medici, Fugger, Funk, Schacht, von Krosig, et al.
belongs to
https://michaelhoffman.substack.com/p/psychic-self-defense-and-revisionist
You forget to reference the quote shva.
You are telling us that the band the Fugees and Mancini the Italian football player turned coach ran the banking world hundreds of years ago? WTF…Did they reincarnate? 😂 😂
Err… no, you have embarrased yourself again. Not that you have any shame.
Lifting not just one but several quotes from the Michael Hoffman article – as has already been pointed out by another commenter – and trying to pass them off as your own.
Very obvious, since your usual written style of Pidgen English was absent from the copy and paste stuff you pinched without giving credit to the author. However, it is as clear as daylight in the parts that are your own words, written in your usual style across all your multi-IDs. It is not the first time that you have copy and pasted other people’s work without crediting them. Even fucking up the spelling of the Medici and Fugger family names when it was there for you in the article from which you pilfered parts.
The above post did have the Hoffman links and the pending approval took them off.
Establish some facts:
The other forums dont have full articles written about me, unlike you and your 1000 different id;s and what a weirdo hogging the oGoD forum with 100’s of ids EdwigeErikNielsenLu1brianboroucorrespondencecommittteeRepublicofscotlandetc etc known as the creep who replies to his own comments and has full forum conversations with himherself.
I am not the one they call ‘Jeffery Epstein of the OG forum’ that is keeping files on everyone’s comments.
RollingRockEdwigeErikNielsenLu1brianboroucorrespondencecommitttee etc you do not need my approval, so stop showing off and hogging the comment section limelight and bullying and getting other members censored and getting off on comment section sexual power dynamics of – who is the best poster, which you seem to get off on.
This is a lie isn’t it.
Don’t do this please. A2
This place feels like it is going to the dogs. Someone else remarked recently about the quality of comments going downhill.
Who knows how many other multi-IDers there are here?
In case there are ones I haven’t spotted, I hate the idea of replying in good faith to what maybe just a few people (or even one) pretending to be many.
Keeps the number of comments looking high which may be considered a good thing by OffG but at what cost?
A waste of time and energy.
It is frustrating but concurretly provides, a weird, encouragement.
Imagine, if, the designers provided an eternal ‘not sure’
Oh I don’t doubt this for a second. A much easier alternative to creating a coherent propaganda message to quell dissenting voices is to just provide equal and opposite bizarre, empty BS to muddle everything into stagnation.
I bet their intelligence brief isn’t expressed as beautifully as this (pleased with this I am), and that’s probably why we’ll ultimately win. 🙂
One can’t suppress meaningful thought and creativity for ever. A2
Your “feelings” are wrong. Some of you are doing the sheeple’s usual try to correct everything the Redacteur does. Thinking they should run the Site……from time to time..
Every public info or messaging needs a third party moderator to quality control the content. Are you guys not aware of that?
Are you wilfully ignoring what has been said about you?
You have been accused of being me, a complete lie, by someone who is a proven multi-IDer.
Yet, that doesn’t bother you? It should.
You often have time to write sarcastic, or facetious replies or play devils’s advocate, yet when you could put your skills to use on something like this, you are silent.
From what Admin has said in the past, OffG want the site to be self-moderating. So join in and do some, rather than sitting there hiding in the corner.
You’re a long-time regular, it’s in your interest. Unless, you are just here to let off a bit of steam and pass the time of day.
Why is it only me who cares enough to call this crap out?
Yea I have to say, that’s really weird. It would be nice if people could behave like natural, organic commenters with sane, relatable motives for commenting a little more 😅
Rather, it seems to this Admin, there’s some unwritten agreement, psychic or otherwise, to withhold this.
But this place probably chewed me up and spat me out long ago lol. Perhaps my compass is completely off.
I don’t really understand why some commenters are happy to become associated with multi-ID posters without a challenge, though.
But hey, in a place like this, where anyone could be anyone else, perhaps they prefer not to take the bait?
I mean, YOU know if you’re real, don’t you? And that counts for a lot.
A2
It does count for a lot, but I will not stand by when someone throws mud. To the casual reader or those who haven’t followed the soap opera it may stick, especially as this troll has used several IDs to make the false accusation.
I don’t take shit in real life and neither will I in the virtual world.
My guess as to why others who have been named don’t get involved is that they don’t want to affect their popularity, or they simply want to ‘go along to get along’.
Makes me wonder what they did during the Plandemic. If they can’t confront an online troll, imagine in the real world when faced with difficult or confrontational situations how they would react? They would simply bow their heads and say “Yes Sir, No Sir”.
This one actually tried to dox a regular commenter here by mentioning the town that they live in. The comment was put to me but since I am not that person it didn’t matter. I have no idea if that was the correct town but I told the troll to write it as reply to the regular in question. They didn’t, but I am sure the regular would have seen it, yet said nothing. What sort of person allows an attempt at doxxing them to go unchallenged? Mind boggling.
There are too many of these types.
They are hiding and they are far away. Thus the best way is to fly over (Matrix).
In heaven there is peace and they cant reach you. Over.
Hi A2…. I stopped posting here because you accused me of not being polite enough… I was also pending on all my posts. I felt rejected. No really. I’m high IQ and beleive me it’s a poisoned gift socially. I have the courage of cander and posting now because I’m 1/4 tipsy. You also inserted in your impatient answer that your organisation was hanging on strings or something… that scared the sh out of me… remember the emoss era? Look… aw nevermind
Do go ahead and post in peace if you want. I read that old thread back. It coincided with a real push to portray OffG as a limited hangout and highly censored etc.. There was clearly something funny going on. I’m always happy to retract a remark if it’s wrong or out of place, and I apologise if I was too cynical about your motives. 🙂 A2
Not really. To tell the truth I dont fokking care whether someone are multi-Id or other mysterious.
What takes me to this site is that I learn something. The articles and discussion make me wiser to the world I live in, and thus I become more able to be an asset also to my fellow men.
In return to what I receive here, I try my best to give something back, to make other people wiser to what I know that they could use to be able to the same.
I try to make jokes so as the day becomes a little easier for everyone, give out the cites I myself love from the bible, give links to life loving music or dance I enjoyed myself.
So it really doesnt matter who enter in the space. And if they are unreliable trolls, cia, m16, whatever, I expect Sam to care care of these cases because this is a moderators job.
Actually I expect too a Sam or another Moderator clean out my comment if they think it is beyond some line for them as I do not know what is going on in the media world all.
Out own job is to maintain a serious and amigavel level as far as possible.
So, Out on the floor and dance gentlemen: https://youtu.be/8MzoyT26OM4
Re: going to the dogs.
I have posted less than 30 times.
You attention seeker posts actually more like hogs the forum with long boring show off fake intelligentsia of wanting to be the big I am virtually every day.
Correct, mainly about you.
The ‘Jeffery Epstein of the OG forum’ that is keeping files on everyone’s comments.
If your memory is good then you no it is not hard to see the trolling you do under other ids.
Sicko’s replying to there own comments and wanting other people banned who do not agree with them.
You’re the sicko.
Mentally unstable that you hsd to create so many IDs You may have posted only 30 times under shva but hundreds over time using your others. One gets a go for a while, then you bring back a previous one or a new one.
You are fucking little troll-ey dolly.
I am not attention seeking, you are the one who seeks recognition, constantly taking a dump on the site, the authors and your favourite pet hate Christians.
Fine, that’s your opinion but why stay here?
Why not fuck off somewhere else more aligned with your views or go back to your little secret group where you gossip like a bunch of fishwives about commenters on here.
Guys, I want you both to calm down please. Get a hold of yourselves.
This is all wasted energy we should probably be giving to those we love or using to explore and understand ourselves and the nature of reality.
Are you researching the nature of reality?
I have mentioned it here and have had chats with a few people who were interested. It’s a fairly niche topic. My opinion is that the answers to many of the biggest questions will be found if only we understood the structure and mechanisms of the reality and our place within it.
It’s an area where imagination, lateral and critical thinking skills can really be put to use.
And how! 😎
That is the hard bit. Having an open mind is the number one requisite.
The answers are to be found in exploring the metaphysical. I don’t mean religion nor the New Age movement, although there are clues and snippets there.
I think we can carry the knowledge, but just cannot access it easily. Search for some of my comments and conversations with other on these themes. There were interesting links poted.
Whatever this reality looking at it from a purely physical angle and trying to make sense of it, will result in going around in circles.
I genuinely think it’s a mark of a genuinely smart person being able to articulate this sort of thing. I tip my hat to you, friend. 🙂 A2
Thank you Sam. It’s rare to receive a compliment around these parts, as you well know. 😉
I have reached the point where I know I must spend more spare time delving into this topic.
Post some evidence to show I am any one of those names. You just invent shit and are a pathological liar. I have posted evidence that you were several other IDs in the past. So shit or get off the pot.
I am pretty sure, for example, in the case of Brianberou that he would NOT want to be thought of as me.
The fact that the other names who you have accused of being me in the past – using your different IDs – is a constantly changing list of names says it all.
It also strange that both Edwige and Erik Nielsen, two you have been consistent with, have not defended themselves against the accusation. Perhaps you are not the only multi-IDer here.
As to keeping “files” I have no need to, I have good memory and recognise patterns. You are too easy to spot.
His function is to attempt to sow confusion and doubt, however, he has swallowed his own brief. To repeat my comment on another thread, he is a complete eegit !
I do wonder. Or it is just a simple troll that hates the site and wants to attack it constantly.
I don’t know if you have noticed that its favourite punching bag above everything is your religion for some reason. None of the others strangely enough, athough a passing reference maybe made to those after I pointed out the clear anti-Christian angle previously.
Those who criticise all religions equally are a different case, as it is fair but singling out Christianity smells of an agenda, especially since it is the one in the crosshairs of the controllers.
By the way, I think it is a woman, not a man.
Its agenda is to sow distrust and throw, to use a Cricketing metaphor, googlies. Yes, it could equally be a woman or it might be a collective.
The Hoffman link is a pay link. Cant access your ref and info without paying. Let go. I feel you try to define a reality here that dont exist because of your own troubles.
There is a school of thought based on evidence that considers the Medicis were crypto-Js.
https://nwobroadcastcorp.wordpress.com/2024/01/22/medicis-fuggers-borgiascecils-the-crypto-jewish-royalty/
Also Pope Leo X was one too according to Miles Mathis who you are a fan of.
https://www.henrymakow.com/2022/09/edward-menez-three-crypto-jews.html
I thought the Third Reich freed itself from the usury cartel and prospered until the cartel launched its war against it?
Yeah stuff is coming out about Chomsky that shows him in a different light – the Global Warming Saga is a great money making scheme for the PTB – the Earth heats up and cools down in cycles and we are going through a heating up phase – some bought and paid for scientists have produced reports – that have the PTB jumping on them that has led to ways for them to make money especially from the Global South countries – whilst in the West, the Green Agenda has been pushed hard to get us to comply with it, using the nonsensical Net Zero slogan.
Look at the 30 mile road built in Brazil – chopping down countless ancient trees, probably with species on the still to be discovered along with unknown plants that could have medicinal healing qualities to build a road for COP30 to beheld in November of this year.
The COP meeting are now just Davos meeting for the environment – where cons, sorry laws – will be laid out against the masses to force us to comply with them, huge bungs under the guise of Green Grants will he handed out to corporations who pretend to be Green (Greenwashing) – no doubt the politicians will receive a fair bit of kick-back for handing over huge chunks of public monies to these companies – its all just one big con and as usual the masses – as well as being duped and programmed to follow down the Green road, pay for it as well.
Big Chem has been pushing for state-by-state legislation shielding themselves from liability for injuries called by pesticides. Two successes – Georgia and North Dakota – so far….
https://substack.com/home/post/p-168601220
I thought they were covered by calling it virus. But off course, you cant be insured enough.
The truth will never come out. It doesn’t matter; we all know the Rothschilds control the central banking system, which in turn controls everything.
The Holocaust and anti Semitism are the blanket to cover up debate and the truth. It gives the excuse to slaughter men, women, and children to create a Zionist homeland. It now controls all major corporations by means of debt and monopoly manipulation. It exploits the poor and poor nations.
It uses tools like climate change to manipulate policy. It controls the science and media. When you control fiat money, you control everything. They use perverts like Savile and Epstein to blackmail the powerful. They weaken the people using drugs and vaccines. Mossad is their tool to threaten and destroy anyone who stands in their way.
Understand that all governments are controlled by the Israel lobby and leading politicians are groomed at university. We are now under the yoke of Zionism. This was their goal all along.
It’s not antiSemitism, it’s the truth.
Do you understand why Israel has the highest co-n-vid jab rate on the marble?
That Chomsky guy, wasn’t he somehow also involved in the Epstein saga..???
“Epstein donated at least $850,000 between 2002 and 2017 to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where Chomsky taught for decades.”
Chomsky the promoter of free speech and openness . “Epstein? None of your business“. https://thebridgelifeinthemix.info/child-abuse/noam-chomsky-meets-epstein-none-business/
Who isn’t!
These Turds wrote and own the rules. All we can do is try to live the best lives we can.
Love, laugh, sing, dance and be merry.
Those normal things are being removed by the day, Johnny. We need to shove the turds back up their own arse.
In 1992 George HW Bush eagerly attended Rio with his EPA chief, William K. Reilly, fresh from his post as pres. of World Wildlife Fund. In 1992 Reilly wrote “The Road from Rio” in which he gushed about Agenda 21:
Agenda 21 represents an extraordinary new global consensus on standards against which to measure the environmental performance of governments. No doubt the press, non-governmental groups, and the business community will mine these documents for years to come. The human rights commitments of the 1970s and 1980s, the Helsinki Accords, and others, offer a model for how committed nongovernmental interests can confer authority on moral obligations and translate them into new policies.https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/aboutepa/road-rio.html“…
‘Science is about Measurement,
whereas Economics is about Measurement’ … (anon) …
Money talks, bullshit walks. Chomsky’s a weird bird, especially considering his reputation. But his stance on 9/11 (or anyone’s), not to mention the scamdemic, is just anathema to any true anti-establishment truth and freedom loving rebel. I mean, good grief, that says it all in my book. If you don’t know by now, you’re fucking stupid, or ignorant, no offense sister, and if not, you’re a sycophantic (or psychophantic) shill. I don’t know which is worse. It’s like with Trump, although there are many, almost countless other examples, but his continued proud boast of “his” Operation Warpspeed makes him unacceptable in and of itself. That’s enough, that’s all you need to know that he ain’t on our (anti-establishment freedom and truth rebels) fucking side. Not for the purposes we should be aiming for. Same with Chomsky. Same with Arnold “Screw their freedom” Swarzenegger, same with anyone. This century – 9/11 and the Scamdemic, where’re you at, man?
Chomsky has academic tunnel vision. He can’t see $atan for the flames.
He doesn’t have that “thing”, Johnny. Like an innate trait some of us get and most don’t.
Tenured jobs in academia are hard to get. He has spewed convenient BS for decades. Maybe he wants to die “in office”.
This piqued my interest to find those memory holed clips. The closest contender for genuine audio of Edmund de Rothschildadvocating for the CO2 climate alarmist scam is from this video by George Hunt “George Hunt Stumbles Into NWO Meeting Exposes 1992 Earth Summit Agenda 21” on Internet Archive site (publication date 1992, upload date 2021). Also on YouTube here. If you jump to timestamp 28:38, the video producer purports to have captured the audio of both Maurice Strong and Edmund de Rothschild speaking at the 4th World Wilderness Congress worldwide conservation Denver, Colorado, in September 1987. *Timestamp for Rothschild speaking is just after 30:37 when Strong introduces him. I can’t yet find the text, audio, or video from the Earth Summit in 1992 featuring Edmund de Rothschild.I’ve uploaded just the purported audio recording to my SubStack here, and Odysee here, and I have produced a transcript for Rothschild’s speech part in both of the aforementioned hyperlinks.
RE: “…by the famed neo-Marxist professor Noam Chomsky.”
This seems like a slight of hand denunciation against Marxism, especially as Chomsky has long been known to be very hostile to Marxism. Chomsky is part of the “compatible left” (a concept articulated by Thomas Braden (of the CIA) and used to subdue the left. (They succeeded!) Not surprisingly, NC is also a left gatekeeper.
In other words, calling Chomsky a “famed neo-Marxist” means that you either don’t know what you are talking about and/or you haven’t done your homework. So, the author is, at minimum, intellectually lazy.
Its because MSM fill us all with managed narratives and labels.
So in order to be understood in these quick comments here, we use the words we expect people to understand.
When the author describe NC that way i understand very well what he mean.
I do it myself although I know the label maybe not is fit. But there is no time for corrections of gramma in public discussions.
Nevertheless we, both the author and me, apologize deeply for the hurt feelings on ‘Marxism’ and the good ‘Marxists’.
Chomsky is/was an exponent of the Anarchist Variant ‘anarcho-syndicalism’,
the application of which requires extensive industrialisation as its basis…
Maybe when President Trump’s ‘re-industrialisation’ of the USA ever occurs
there might be a renewal of interest in that Anarchist Variant…
It is notable that NC in his published works never wrote any books on anarchism and when he did talk about it was always in the most general and vague terms. I never encountered him talking about anarchist theory, or even other anarchists. I have never encountered him criticizing contemporary anarchism in any way like Murray Bookchin (really an unacknowledged giant of 20th Century anarchism) did in his famous polemic Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism: An Unbridgeable Chasm which I think is a thorough and scathing criticism of what would later be known as Identity Politics (that showed up in 1980’s anarchist circles).
I have included a link to the piece below as it is still very relevant today after more than 30 years.
https://libcom.org/article/social-anarchism-or-lifestyle-anarchism-unbridgeable-chasm-murray-bookchin
I’ve heard it said that Chomsky endorsed Bookchin’s theories, so there’s that. But yes, in general, he had little to say on the subject of anarchism — except that it is supposedly the cure for all that ails us.
There’s a big difference between “marxism” and what marx said. Then there’s Marx’s blind spot for the role of big banks, coincidentally(!) similar to Eddy. Then of course there’s the hideous history of communism, and fascism which is merely a derivative.
To you first point, I totally agree. Your second, the “blind spot”, I don’t consider a valid criticism as Marx focused on the capitalist system, not sectors of capital, nor individuals. As to your last point “hideous history of communism”, you are getting that perspective from authors who all have a pro-capitalist/anti-communist bias. (Basically, if you want to get published in prominent journals you have to condemn the soviet project – that’s a given.)
See the work of Grover Furr. Below Furr is criticizing one of the most well-known anti-communist “scholars”, and showing that the sources he cites are fraudulent in every case.
Go to the 9-minute mark in the video.
So…..no President dare to contradict these extreme rich “families”.
They are behind all global (Rockefeller funded UN) to take advantage as middlemen between nations in both war and trade.
Only the ones who were murdered !
Climate is a new word. Newspeak. We have black and we have white. We have plus and we have minus.
Climate is a black word, a false word. Weather is a white, a true word.
Climate is a financial scheme invented on a desk to make the weather a negative stock risk. Pure illusion like fiat and digital money.
“What’s the punchline ?”
“Chomsky !!”
Ps. I was just beginning to have it in for this de Rothchild feller,
then got deflected to ‘Chomsky’ !!
Off topic, but important. I agree I’m afraid:
I have said the same repeatedly to several people. They just laugh and they dont care.
I said listen, you wake in the morning and take your Iphone, on work/school you look into a computer, in the afternoon a powerpoint, when home you look into a TV.
10 hours/day with a flatscreen. If you do this in 10 years you are done. You cannot connect correctly to anything outside in the real world. You have become an alien.
You know a photo dont have smell, noise, heat or freeze or sense.
A video have either a person speaking or music and is a fragment again without smell without senses.
A powerpoint is again a false fragment of reality in form of statistics and curves.
It is not rocket science but simple analysis. If your senses is not in use they wont work.
This is evident in basic maths because of the over reliance on machines many cannot simple multiplication, addition and subtraction without them. Moreover, because of the increasing dependence on Sat Navs, the ability to use a road map is a complete mystery to a growing section of the population.
Yes, some call it ‘functional illiterate’. I see many examples of this.
Latest I read many Sailing Yachts went down in a storm near the Baleares Islands, and luckily no one drowned.
But they have all relied on the weather radio and electronic tools who said the wind would come from one direction, and therefore they all with their TV group think anchored up in a harbour where they thought the wind would just pass by and they were protected.
But in real life the storm showed up to come from the opposite direction ..LOL.
Has anyone else noticed that people (or is it just Americans) are shouting when they make videos?
Have you tried to make a video speaking normal?
Trust me, after seeing mumbling videos a couple of times you will do the same.
Vaxed people are just the same, hooked to their phones or not
“We are at the parting of the ways. We have, not one or two or three, but many, established and formidable monopolies in the United States. We have, not one or two, but many, fields of endeavor into which it is difficult, if not impossible, for the independent man to enter. We have restricted credit, we have restricted opportunity, we have controlled development, and we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world — no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”
– Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom, p 201
Chomsky is just a limited hangout and a poodle. A man who wanted the unjabbed to be isolated during the Scamdemic. If Oh-whining Jones is calling him a “giant” then that is a sign he is anything but.
Evelyn de Rothschild even once had a public word with Charlie boy, to set the pecking order straight it would seem. It is not as if Charlie’s globalist credentials or his old man Phil who was an early President of the World Wildlife Fund, a conservation front for a eugenicist anti-human agenda, were not on board with the bigger agenda. After all, no serious conservationists – unlike the Royal Family – go around on Safari in Africa or in the Scottish highlands with 12 bore shotguns filling as many animals and birds as they can with lead shot.
I have difficulty in even mention slime Chomsky without saying a lot of bad words.
Yes Rothschild is running most of the show and this comes as a BIG surprise for you guys why you certainly dont wanna discuss this issue with a Silverhat.
They are to bogged down in dogma.
They don’t wish to discuss it in depth because it would open up a Pandora’s box of : who is controlling whom, what their goals are, what their beliefs are and the being the controlling central banking families worship .
He gifted Bamoral and Sandringham.Of course Rothschild is the crown and Charlie is the pretender to the throne.
A very enlightening article which should make the “ they are all in together “ crowd reflect how the Russian Federation, after its economic rape and almost total collapse because of the Rothschild’s and co, under the premiership of Putin booted them out.
https://www.voltairenet.org/article168007.html
The real “Woke Right” isn’t those criticizing Trump, it’s those who refuse to criticize Trump.
hint hint.
Not a great hint, could be interpreted two ways. Ie those who refuse to criticise Trump are
1 Really too stupid to see how truly evil is Trump
2 See how utterly irrelevant Trump is, he is just a side show distraction
Which one
Only 2 choices is not accepted.
I would like to see the alternative to Trump? Please dont come up with a colourful diversity Obama again.
I think we can sum this article up with: ‘History is written by the winners’.
Right now, the Ashkenazi DNA coming from Eastern Europe is being written out of history in the indecent haste to call Ashkenazi Jews ‘Semites’. Semitic DNA has its historical roots not in Eastern Europe, not in Khazaria, rather in the lands surround the southern and Eastern Mediterranean.
But as the nazis with a victim complex continue to try and control the USA, Europe and even Russia, truth is a victim of the cultural war going on, before we even talk about the genocidal war going on on the ground in Palestine.
They are replacing indigenous people with invaders and the DNA testing fraudsters are fully on board with the deception. Watching a caucasian blue eyed sponsored video blogger show his DNA test to the audience that claimed his ancestors are from the ‘Holy Land’ was vomit inducing. Keep telling a lie long enough….
Semites are people of the Levant. The largest population at present are in Yemen, followed by Palestine. As established by genetic research, the pretender vermin have no connection, whether from Kazaria or elsewhere.
I knew that. I’ve had my head buried in the historical demography for a while now.
DNA from fallen angels or what? My research so far is that we are 2 different species down here.
Humans and some kind of reptiles who claim they came from a fish who suddenly got 4 legs and started to walk on land and developed into an ape and them developed into a Cro-Magnon man and the rest of the story you guys know.
All right, just in order to get along.
Search = Epstein
1 result found
Page 277
Page not included in sample
Chomsky is a gatekeeper who will lead a horse to the water but will not allow it to drink.
Venice is the birthplace of global banking, not Frankfurt.
It’s the birthplace of Rothschild banking. Read between the lines.
Leading humans to knowledge (of limited hangouts) but not allowing them to think seems to have been Chompsky’s role as world champion of public intellectuals, his voluminous work taking such big bites of seemingly everything one needs to know as to serve as a one-stop shop of controlled opposition.
Suspicion was warranted from the get-go of his career, when he cozied up with the Warren Commission and CIA psyop of conspiracy theory to lay down, in other words of his for mind control, “the boundaries of thinkable thought” regarding the JFK assassination. He remained dogmatically dismissive thereafter of any such line of inquiry (e.g., 9/11) that might stray into forbidden territory beyond conventional accounts of gatekeepers keeping the rabble in line.
Likewise, his focus on US global hegemony post-WW2, while crammed full of critical information, still reads like academic analysis of geopolitics from mainstream propaganda, especially from the newspaper of record New York Times, which maintains establishment frames of interpretation like nation-state rivalries to the neglect of ruling class actors, like those mentioned by the author above, playing the grand chessboard behind the scenes.
I wouldn’t refer to him as neo-Marxist like the author has, however. If anything, he aligned with cold war anti-communism from ‘the left’. Most often, he’d call himself an anarcho-syndicalist, though absent is anything in depth from anarchist tradition beyond enlightenment look-alikes and scattered citations of leading figures like Bakunin (useful for countering if not demonizing Marxism-Leninism and the USSR). His ‘anarchism’ certainly didn’t stop him from playing partisan politics of capitalism when it came to supporting Killary and the lesser evil Democrats and crying foul and fascism for Republicans as the most dangerous party on earth and Trump as Hitler, classic agitprop.
Reputation as a radical he’s had was gained while a longtime resident of MIT (DARPA U), where the kind of cutting-edge Frankenscience coming to fruition now was noticeably overlooked all those years. His own expertise in linguistics focused on genetics, so maybe there was some overlap of interests and agenda, as his association with Epstein might also suggest (though that’s “none of (our) business” as he said). Nonetheless, there seems no need for sinister speculation when he so proudly came out with covid to call for ‘health’ protocols of ghettoizing the unvaccinated for final solutions that might make Nazis blush.
Who started usury sharks and 30 silver shekels?
What does Trump (or his puppetmasters) call his highest profile campaign? DOGE! They like to pay their little tributes.
BTW the Doge wasn’t the real power in Venice, it was an oligarchy (another Venetian invention).
Can’t Augsburg put in a claim?
Climate has changed before?
“ . . . it is these ocean state changes that are
1:02:28 correlated with the great disasters of the past impact can cause extinction but
1:02:35 it did so in our past only wants[once] that we can tell whereas this has happened over
1:02:40 and over and over again we have fifteen evidences times of mass extinction in the past 500 million years
1:02:48 so the implications for the implications the implications of the carbon dioxide is really dangerous if you heat your
1:02:55 planet sufficiently to cause your Arctic to melt if you cause the temperature
1:03:01 gradient between your tropics and your Arctic to be reduced you risk going back
1:03:07 to a state that produces these hydrogen sulfide pulses . . . “?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ako03Bjxv70
Tony Heller.
The weather is a coupled non-linear chaotic system not possible to predict more than max 7-14 days ahead. (IPCC 2006). Why?
Because the earth circulate around the sun while it circulate around itself while the moon circulate around the earth pulling in the earth, making daily tide and low.
Hereto comes the filtration by the spheres of the cosmic strays
That is why it is not possible to predict the weather other than short term by low pressure (cold) or high pressure (warm). It is that easy man!
I wonder why content-designer Jose-Luis Olivares put an outsized Hawker Hurricane in the Troposhere? Wouldn’t a Cessna have served his purpose? Or is he subtly saying something about the weather?
Why dont you write to him (a visual artist) directly and ask?
Or, are you trying to turn the discussion here “false weather fraud” into something else??
If you wanna hear my view about his art work, I think his use of a Hawker here is a perfect illustration of the conditions in the Troposphere.
I dont understand the satellite in the Thermosphere as here is said to go to 2000C in the upper layer plus the placement above the Karman line.
But as this is a quick take on the principles I think we must leave the details and concentrate on the overall picture and the message it has to us and the bankers financial fiddling of reality.