Charlie Kirk; Or How the Right Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Cancel Culture
Kit Knightly
Since the assassination of Charlie Kirk last week the theories have been flying thick and fast.
The alleged shooter has been identified as a pro-transgender campaigner into furry internet culture and also a traditional Republican Mormon. He is both a leftist anti-fa agent and a far-right “Groyper” fan of Nick Fuentes.
Others suggest the alleged shooter, regardless of his politics, is just a patsy, and Kirk was killed by Mossad operatives for turning against Israel. People are analyzing video footage minutely looking for bullet paths and possible suspects in the security entourage.
Still others maintain Kirk was never killed at all, and the whole thing is a fake psy-op.
We have yet to receive the “official version” from on high but, when we do, you can be sure it won’t satisfy everybody, and debate will rage.
Thus far, there is only one certitude we can take away from the case – cancel culture is alright, really.
For years, the Republican position has been that leftist “cancel culture” – ruining lives and careers because of “offensive” social media posts – is ridiculous and morally wrong.
Not anymore, now massive social media campaigns are launched against anyone who celebrates, minimizes or even fails to adequately mourn the death of Charlie Kirk.
A searchable database of over 20,000 individuals celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder will soon be available on our website.
It will be searchable by general location, employer, and industry type. Political violence can never be the answer.
— Charlie Kirk Data Foundation (@forcharliekirk1) September 12, 2025
Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m no fan of celebrating murder. And, indeed, would argue that those people posting videos cheering on the assassin are symptomatic of greater societal problems in various ways (being shocking for engagement, cheapening of human life and general disengagement from reality chief among them), but that doesn’t mean people should be doxed, bullied or fired.
Free speech needs to cover inappropriate jokes and just generally being a bad person.
Someone who used to espouse that belief is Elon Musk…
…but that hasn’t stopped him – or, at least, the person running his X account – from abandoning his commitment to absolute free speech in favour of the hysterical doxxing of anyone who doesn’t look sad enough.
Other high-profile rightwing talking heads are taking part:
Also, just reported you 🙂 everyone else should too. Screw “free speech” shut them down @elonmusk
— Lauren Witzke (@LaurenWitzkeDE) September 13, 2025
Free speech isn't free from consequences. Tomorrow, we are filing a PRIVILEGED motion to censure Ilhan Omar and remove her from her committees. This will force a vote.
Half measures are not enough any more.
Ilhan Omar is not compatible with our American values. She has no… pic.twitter.com/SwTe0sML5b
— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) September 16, 2025
Not since the death of George Floyd has performative moralizing been so important to keeping your job. A parallel that is likely anything but accidental.
This culminated, earlier today, with Attorney General Pamela Bondi announcing that “hate speech has no place in society”:
Pam Bondi now openly admits that the U.S. government will target anyone they label as using “hate speech.”
She says hate speech is not free speech and has no place in society, especially after what happened to Charlie Kirk. pic.twitter.com/tIP6po5vqz
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) September 16, 2025
“Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences”? “Hate speech is not free speech”? These are the most absurd tenets of the anti-freedom “liberal” class, suddenly being embraced by the right wing. It’s yet another example of both “sides” backing the same broad policies for different reasons.
To complete the gaslighting world-inversion, those same people who would use those arguments to get people fired for racist jokes only two weeks ago, are suddenly bridling at them.
It’s just like the vaccines. Remember that? When Trump announced Project Warp Speed, and mainstream outlets were publishing warnings about “rushed” vaccines, only to totally flip when Biden “won” the 2020 election. They do it this way on purpose.
Republican or Democrat, under the right circumstances, both teams now agree that free speech doesn’t mean the freedom to say things that are morally wrong or factually incorrect or…whatever. Which is actually the antithesis of free speech. Everyone believes in free speech they agree with.
Ironically enough, Charlie Kirk himself provided a fine riposte to the “hate speech” talking point:
Whatever did or didn’t happen to the man, and whoever is or isn’t responsible, there’s no denying he got that right.
Thanks for reading...
You can help us keep doing what we do. Every little helps and is hugely appreciated.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.




