Trump vs the BBC
Kit Knightly
Let's get ready to ruummbbbblllleeee!
Donald Trump’s threat to sue the BBC for one billion dollars is yet another fake division intended to prop up the make-believe “sides” in the political debate.
That’s the short version. Here’s the backstory.
Last month, the BBC’s flagship anthology documentary series Panorama aired an episode on the January 6th “insurrection” which “accidentally” edited together two speeches by Donald Trump, making it seem he explicitly ordered people to attack the Capitol (he did no such thing, but that’s old news).
Under public pressure from the Trump administration, the BBC have now admitted the “error” and both the Director General Tim Davie and news CEO Deborah Turness have resigned.
Now, President Donald Trump is threatening to sue the BBC for $1billion unless there is a full retraction and apology by Friday, the 14th of November.
This has spurred British pundits and politicians alike to jump to the defence of the BBC, repeating age-old nonsense about being perceived as “biased against both sides”:
This tells me 2 things: first, we are too often an angry society incapable of, or unwilling to hear voices that challenge us …and second, the BBC is probably roughly in the right place if everyone thinks they’re on the opposite side! https://t.co/4dTxvkaBuN
— Tim Farron (@timfarron) November 11, 2025
Or how right-wingers are trying to undermine our faith in institutions.
Or that the BBC “isn’t perfect but”…blah blah blah:
The BBC isn’t perfect. But it remains an institution defending British values against a populist, Trump-style takeover.
Party leaders must unite to defend it. pic.twitter.com/Cgf9FrkRTK
— Liberal Democrats (@LibDems) November 10, 2025
Now, I hate this discourse because it is fake.
Partly, because it is yet another pretend divide. A fake binary between the fake President and the fake journalists at the BBC.
But mostly, I hate any discussion about media “bias” because it displays a fundamental misunderstanding of what the BBC is and how it works.
To make my point, let’s go back in time twenty-four years.
On September 11th 2001, BBC correspondent Jane Standley was reporting live from New York to the BBC studios in London. She told the UK’s rapt television audience that World Trade Centre Building 7 – the Solomon Brothers Building – had just collapsed due to fire.
The only problem was that, not only had the building not collapsed, it was actually visibly still standing just behind her left shoulder.
Jane Standly – BBC Clairvoyant Extraordinaire
The real collapse occurred about thirty minutes later.
Tellingly, neither the BBC nor the reporter herself have ever offered a real explanation for this incident, and certainly never meaningfully explored its implications. Indeed, they went to some lengths to pretend it never happened.
This is an infamous story. Cited often for good reason: It illustrates irrefutable fore-knowledge of the collapse.
But it does more than that. It shows us how things work, and allows us to infer what went wrong. Broadly, one of two things must have happened:
- The BBC was given the information and reported it early by accident.
- The BBC reported the information on time, but the implosion faced an unforeseen delay.
We can deconstruct this further and then extrapolate out to learn a lesson about the media in general — namely, that the media report what they are told to report regardless of reality.
Standley was in the middle of reporting to the country that a 47-storey building had fallen down while it was still there.
She could see it, but she told the entire world it was gone. Why? Because someone told her it was. She never checked because she’s not employed to check. That is her function, that is what she’s for. To paraphrase Chomsky, if she wasn’t like that she wouldn’t be there.
She didn’t just report it, she believed it.
That is not just her, it’s not even just the BBC, it’s the media in general. They are not liars, they are biological megaphones amplifying messages they lack the capacity to analyse.
Dummies, literally.
Their corporate masters have all five fingers deep inside them and flap their wooden jaws to create the illusion of speech. When the BBC talks, you can barely see the Deep State’s mouth moving.
That’s why it’s funny to me to talk about the BBC being biased. It’s a naïve acceptance that the BBC is what it pretends to be, a journalism outlet, rather than what it is – a state-backed entity designed with the sole purpose of maintaining state control over narrative.
The BBC isn’t biased. You need agency to be biased. You need personality, ideas and opinions.
The BBC is worse than biased, it is a morally vacuous horseshit hosepipe, repeating “the truth” as it is dictated to them from on high.
…and more and more people know that, or at least feel it. The allegedly plummeting number of license-fee payers is evidence of that.
Which brings us back to Donald Trump and his pending lawsuit.
It is a contrived conflict intended to satisfy fans of either side by reinforcing pre-existing notions. Those invested people watching are so brainwashed into the fake divide that they don’t even see the same things; their eyes cloud over with pre-programmed interpretations.
TEAM A watches the news and sees big bad bully Trump attacking the well-meaning (but in this case accidentally in the wrong) BBC. They think they are the decent minority speaking truth to power.
TEAM B watches the same news and sees Daddy Donald being unfairly victimised by the media because he’s fighting the good fight.
Trump gets a boost to his fading credentials as an outsider, the UK government can whip up patriotic support for the poor little BBC.
This kind of win-win is the tell-tale sign of the fake news false binary. If you doubt that, you need look no further than its origins for confirmation: A “leaked” memo handed to the Telegraph, expressing “concerns” about institutional bias.
Or, indeed, see how it’s already being used to brand the BBC as some kind of resistance hub:
‘This is a moment where the BBC could lead the way against Trump.’
@arusbridger explains why the US President’s threat to sue the BBC over editing his speech could backfire. pic.twitter.com/0vOkes6iZQ— LBC (@LBC) November 10, 2025
Or to support previously unsupportable positions:
Trump DID call for a violent attack on American democracy at the Capitol.
So the BBC Panorama was wrong to edit the footage to make his incitement more explicit than it was, but that’s exactly what he was doing. pic.twitter.com/15N51KNiMe
— Femi (@F_Politics_) November 11, 2025
That’s political activist Femi, arguing that “yes the BBC edited footage to change what Trump said, but that’s OK because we know that’s what he really meant”.
The idea that there is some higher truth you can only achieve by lying is not something a rational society can support…but here we are.
So, in the case of Trump vs the BBC, who wins?
Since the BBC already admitted to wrongdoing, and with so much “they’re not perfect” discourse, I’m guessing Trump just scrapes a win here. Not a comprehensive one, but 55-45 split.
In the end, don’t be surprised if there is some kind of reform of the “ideologically captured” BBC requiring a “temporary increase” in the license fee or a change in the way it’s paid, or increased penalties for refusing or whatever…we all know how this works by now.
But who wins and by how much isn’t the point of the story; the spectacle is. Pick a side and cheer.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Salomon Brothers.
Its a dangerous precedent when a lying vaccine killing president can sue the MSM (his/her mates) this only means they will be coming for alt media/truthers next.
The DefundTheBBC tag seems to be going strong on the algorithmic newstands. If the humiliation of the license fee were removed and the institution was available for a subscription, like Disney and Apple – who at least don’t pretend they occupy some sacred grove, I’d happily continue to not pay for it, nor watch it. I suspect they’ll spin off all news including online, and try to make the remainder (Eastenders and all) subs-only. The crossover e.g. using thick soap characters speak with their masters’ voices, will continue. (As per Disney, Netflix and the other platforms).
Thanks for continuing to spotlight the falsi binaries KK and OffG.
It’s so cringeworthy listening to people discuss this not realizing it’s all theatre and they’re being played.
I’d gladly pay the bbc license fee to see the cast of W1A sitting around the table discussing this very subject.
Calling John Morton!
Wonderful article. Thanks.
These articles are like Theater reviews now. Giving a critique of the show.
And it’s all show.
The tragedy is there are real consequences.
A bit OT, but who actually discovered the BBC Jane Standley’s 9/11 Bldng 7 blunder?
Who would have known, watching that telecast, that that was Bldng 7 still standing?
Or was that blunder intentional? Like so many blunders.
Is it actually a blunder? Just because Jane Standley is ‘Live’ doesn’t mean the footage behind her has to be – it could have been on a time delay or being repeated as a recap.
WTC 7’s collapse was announced by the BBC at 4:57 pm. The building came down at 5;20 pm. So the footage behind her is irrelevant.
Delayed BBC footage i would suspect. Why show live footage to the masses?
Anyway the bigger question would seem to be why WTC7 came down later in the day and not at the self-same time as WTC1 and WTC2?
There were NSA/CIA floors within WTC7 I seem to recall. So was WTC7 simply rigged up later in the day by the self-same team. A trained team could presumably do it in less than a day anyway.
Regardless, a convenient disposal of any extraneous evidence, if only camera footage. Everything nicely wrapped up by sunset, including the day’s story.
Secret Service and SEC housed in bldng 7 I believe. And of course it housed the New York City Emergency Center. Irony of irony.
Perhaps it was supposed to fall with the other two in the morning but something went wrong.
Look out for a spate of BBC articles on Trump’s links to Epstein:
There must be something to hide, when you even start attacking your own erstwhile supporters:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9wv4dx05q5o
$1 (- $5?) billion lawsuits can mysteriously backfire.
As may 2024 presidential campaign (Epstein files release) carrots dangled in front of Virginia Giuffre (/Amy Wallace) as they wrote her ‘unreliable narrator’ memoir. The Trump-whitewashing seemingly to no avail?
The art of the true salesman. Break all promises once in power or the deal is sealed. Though some may still remember them
Glass Houses
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcasting_House
In 2012, it was announced by the then Director-General Mark Thompson that the Egton Wing would be renamed the ‘John Peel Wing’ to commemorate the late Radio 1 disc jockey, whom he described as a “great radio talent”.[15] Thompson described the wing as a “fitting tribute to a man who personified so much of what the BBC stands for”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Peel
He sardonically told The Sunday Correspondent in 1989, “Girls used to queue up outside. By and large not usually for shagging. Oral sex they were particularly keen on, I remember. There was one extraordinary older woman – when I say older, I mean about 21 – came in and just climbed into bed with me. And we had a quick shag and she got dressed and went away again. So to go from years of self-abuse – I was unimaginably innocent by modern standards until I was 21 – to find yourself in that sort of position was like having all your masturbation fantasies becoming fact. But with it came dangers. One of my, er, regular customers, as it were, turned out to be 13, though she looked older. It became expedient to move to Oklahoma”.[44][45]
The John Peel Wing stands adjacent to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Gill
In his personal diaries, Gill described his sexual abuse of his adolescent daughters, an incestuous relationship with at least one of his sisters, and bestiality.[4][10][47] Since these revelations became public in 1989, there have been calls for works by Gill to be removed from public buildings and art collections.
There is of course that side, that wants to cut up the BBC and suck up all that lovely Booty.
The Panorama episode in question.
Did it make reference to the Steele Dossier within the Programme?
BBC Panorama manipulates Elon Musk’s Twitter to falsely claim he finds child sexual abuse amusing
Politico [UK youtuber]
Nov 11, 2025
So, in the case of Trump vs the BBC, who wins?
Since the BBC already admitted to wrongdoing, and with so much “they’re not perfect” discourse, I’m guessing Trump just scrapes a win here. Not a comprehensive one, but 55-45 split.
I am glad the editor picked Trump as the winner.
Forget the blue pill and the red pill when the BBC swallowed the green pill
They would fervently support the climate change lie when any objectively know it is climate variability nothing to do with humans and nothing we can do to change it.
But we can waste a lot of money and increase energy costs while billionaires make out like bandits and try to control our lives from non elected multi national organisations.
BBC is climate biased but that’s not story they want you thinking about.
“…It illustrates irrefutable fore-knowledge of the collapse…”
I’ll declare my hand – I fkn loathe the bbc. But this isn’t irrefutable – confusion of the day…wires crossed…blah.. No doubt a central message was relayed & simply spat out. Clearly, the need to verify was considered irrelevant (trusted source etc). It absolutely raises suspicion of scripts having been prepared & some Jobsworth getting the running order wrong.. But **irrefutable**? No.
People believed (BE-LIE-VED) and still believe that bad CGI airplanes could bring down WTC towers, when the F4 Phantom military grade spec on rails got run into a reinforced concrete wall at 500 mph only penetrated a few mill and was totally destroyed/disintegrated. Not even real airplanes. Bad CGI.
Agreed. If the fire-induced explanation were technically plausible, the actions of the BBC would have also been plausible. That is, the threat of imminent collapse had been miscommunicated; and there were some coincidental technical issues with the live feed. However, it is because the fire-induced explanation is NOT technically plausible that the contemporaneous events are strongly indicative of a pre-planned, controlled demolition; and mis-timed theatrics.
What was the point of the government shutdown?
“Caveat – I have not followed the issue in depth. My understanding is that the Democrats blocked the funding of the government because they wanted additional money for one of their healthcare programs.
Trump used the time of the shutdown to further his politics.
Six weeks later, just as the public was turning against the Republicans, the Democrats caved in:
The longest government shutdown in U.S. history came to an end Wednesday after the House approved the Senate-passed funding package, and President Trump signed the bill into law.
The legislation extends funding for most agencies until Jan. 30 and includes three bills that fund other parts of the government through September 2026.
The Senate approved the legislation on Monday, when seven Democrats and one independent who caucuses with Democrats joined Republicans to end the standoff in the upper chamber. Six House Democrats crossed the aisle and voted to reopen the government.
The only thing that the Democrats have ‘won’ was a promise to put the additional healthcare money to a separate vote:
Eight Senate Democrats broke ranks to reach a deal with Republicans to end the shutdown, dashing the party’s effort to win an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act tax credits in return for their vote to reopen the government. ..
As part of the deal, Democrats secured a promise to hold a vote next month on the tax credits, which help millions of Americans pay for health insurance premiums for plans purchased on state exchanges.
The Republicans will of course reject that measure.
By the way: Why were the tax credits, part of Obama’s health care reforms, time limited in the first place?
To hide their utter defeat the Democrats released a slew of Epstein emails with the hope to plant new sensational rumors about Trump. I have found nothing remarkable in that stack.”
The haves, playing with the lives of the have nots.
Pricks.
As a young printer working in London in 1995, I decided to apply for a job in the bbc. According to their stated job requirements I would have been the ideal candidate. I mentioned it to an older colleague, and I quote his reply as follows – “No fucking point going there mate, you need to be a mason or a queer for those jobs!”
Trump;
When I become your President I will create 50-year mortgages, 15-year car loans, bring in 600,000 Chinese students, tell the American people we need H1B visas because there is no talent here, and protect the Epstein files so no pedophiles are bright to justice!
You forgot “I’ll invite terrorists into the Whitehouse for photo ops just before Veterans’ Day to mock those two gave their lives fighting them.”
Legal immigration is the real replacement agenda and the actual root cause of unaffordability. Not the low value add home Depot latino migrant worker. We are being gaslit and betrayed simultaneously, they want to Eradicate white Christian males just as they are doing to Europe
raise retirement to 70 for hard working Americans
Give 40 BIllions to Argentina, Trillions to Israel. Nuke Iran.
Starve 42 million Americans! Party non stop at mar- a Lago while shutdown
FBI ridiculous narrative political assassination
Threat war with Venezuela
Zero arrests
Promote pharma and their poison with RFK jr.
Fuentes. Tucker. Marge. Boebert. Loomer. Roseanne. Bill Maher. Candace Owens. Joe Rogan. Rand Paul. Rep. Massie. All have spoken out against Trump or Maga lately.
Is the dam finally beginning to break?
whilst Trump made you look to the left, Trump grabbed your money out of your wallet.
(Biggest tax increase in history not approved by Congress).
Is Carlson being set up as a new America first president ?
Do you work for the BBC, Washington Post, maybe MSNBC ?
Just curious.
Yup!
Some context:
https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/16/6-factors-which-point-to-a-rigged-election
President Trump full speech January 6th, 2021
Donald Trump Archive
Aug 4, 2024
45th President Donald Trump held a rally at the Capitol in Washington, DC. January 6th, 2021.
BBC edit
“We’re going down . . . to the Capitol” @ 15:20
“Fight like hell” @ 1:09:55
The Boiling Frog syndrome applies to the insidiousness of Al;
https://www.garydbarnett.com/human-devolution-by-nefarious-means-a-forced-digital-nanotech-transformation/
The toxic plague of Big pHarmer continues;
https://www.globalresearch.ca/autism-made-usa/5874947
As winter approaches, up there in the Scottish heather, George Mc has been busy;
https://open.substack.com/pub/georgemc189059/p/forever-disconnected-dots?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Good onya George.
He sold 7/7 as real with Candaia Owen slop and Finkelstein goyslop: selling the hoax story as half true.
Start with fake and did not happen and Forever Disconnected Dots starts connecting dots rather than waffling angry ex leftie now righty who turned wokie still very much confused.
Well I’m glad you managed to clear up my confusion, Hail – sorry, Weegies.
You do seem very confused even in 2025.
Like this lot.
You never actually say anything Weegies or whatever you call yourself this week. You just blow raspberries.
Isn’t it cynical to tell a woman you love her without “feeling” it? I don’t have to reveal to her that my idea of love is based purely on intellectual grounds; she should be a good friend. I can’t expect her to enjoy her body without communication, can I?
“Are you a liar?” Me? Why would I be? I’m just not emotionally manipulable! “Your statements resemble those of a narcissistic personality disorder, which is characterized by a lack of empathy for others!” Only those who truly suffer deserve pity.
I would say to my lover: “Let’s switch off our feelings and just enjoy our bodies!” Then sex finally becomes what it should be about: sex. But oh dear, disaster looms: “Since I gave myself to you, I feel more for you.”
Now, of course, we cannot say that we ourselves feel the same way. Of course, we can say, “No feelings that are not sexual in nature!” But then we are once again subjected to manipulation, made to feel terrible for moral reasons.
The BBC getting sued is just straight up good news, fuck all your false equivalence shit.
https://youtu.be/AMbhZukhMGY
Who do you think will pay, apart from the tax-farmed? That is if any money passes hands in these absurd entertainments.
Abolishing the BBC will save more than money
The BBC and their litany of lies;
https://dissidentvoice.org/2025/11/inversion-of-reality/
If only the stranded-in-space Chinese astronauts (cosmonauts ?)
were Americans. There’d be endless focus and chatter about their
plight on local TV, even talk of a possible Spielberg-produced
blockbuster movie with mega-movie stars !!
‘Taikonauts’ seems to be the consensus les.
Indian space shuttle looked so fake it must be real #
Whatever happened to Covid? I mean as a subject of discussion.
Bubbling under the surface of Corporate $cum.
someone should sue the BBC for defamation on behalf of the common flu
their extended campaign to portray this minor illness as the fourth Horseman of the Apocalypse is worth trillions, not billions
trillions, not billions, in damages
Heres one for you;
https://www.globalresearch.ca/breaking-86-pcr-positive-covid-cases-not-real-infections/5905098
Kary Mullis was telling the TRUTH.
Too embarrassing for the elites and their tame media. Note how the Guardian only permits readers to blame Liz Truss’s Budget for the UK’s recent economic malaise – not the ‘elephant in the room’ of Johnson closing the economy for two years for ‘covid’.
Or that we have been at war with Russia since 2022
The Unprecedentedly Deadly Virus That Was About To Wipe Out All Humanity wasn’t as scary as it used to be. So they withdrew it and put it on the back burner. The World Socialist Web Site would appear to be the main curators of it at the moment. I just logged on to their main page, did a word search on “Covid” and got 21 hits. So they’re keeping it simmering and ready for its next tour. Though I suspect it won’t draw the same crowds this time. Consider it the “Tarzan” of the media.
Spell it correctly: COV-YID.
WHO’S BEHIND THE CORONA NARRATIVE AND THE JABS? LET THEM TELL YOU THEMSELVES:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/G5pWNgcJJtnS/
There’s plenty of discussion on several substacks. Sasha Latypova, Jessica Rose, Kevin McKernon, Sherry Tenpenny, CHD, Global Research.
It hasn’t gone away in some circles.
Just in mainstream.
I should add Mark Crispin Miller who continues, weekly, to list “died suddenly” obits and many many what seem to be bioweapon injuries.
Did US President Trump say “Ukraine’s Zelensky may be corrupt, but he’s our corrupt
Ukraine leader.” ?
I might be very wrong but I think Trump is Trump’s only concern.
That being the case, if he doesn’t need his ego massaging by BRICS, EU or any other power, and he has the moolah, which he does, why can’t Trump be the brand, rather than the stooge ?
For me it seems that he is trying the brand no? Trump center, Trump Hall, Trump Casion, Trump this and Trump my hat.
I see his constant emphasizing how successful he did the thing, is because nobody else does praise him. People dont understand the genius in what he do, so he has to tell them the thing is actually a brilliant thing he do.
I mean, the American people are use to clapping and praising Obama and shine all over their face, because he started up 5 overseas wars, let the illegal immigrant figures explode, and doubled the national debt. You are goodie goodie Obama. 😂 .
Where are you from Erik? Obviously, English is not your native language and you aren’t an American? Why the big focus on Trump when you don’t know shit about Americans and the U.S.? You seem to be just a fucking troll who goes around giving thumbs down to anyone who speaks ill of your boy Trump. Are you a zionist?
The whole thing may have been staged to drum up sympathy for Trump among his ever-dwindling group of loyal supporters in the US. There’s at least some circumstantial evidence that they want people in the UK to forget about it quickly, because now there’s a new controversy about “a massive backlash” against the BBC having referred to “Kate Middleton” instead of Catherine, the princess of whatever.
I can smell the BS all the way from across the ocean. The “massive backlash” is almost certainly some combination of fiction/gaslighting and astroturfing.
No, not in this case. On the contrary there is BS all over your comment.
Because Trump bashers think he is more evil than all other Presidents together, the mobbing group think it is ok to bring even false mud to the cake, but it is not.
Can we not just agree that it is great that the BBC is getting sued by Trump?
The Fall of the BBC
I’m betting settlement with an NDA.
And no docs about the Epstien files.
November 13, 2025
Germany inches closer to bringing back mandatory military service The newly negotiated compromise, released on Thursday, makes the registration and medical screening of all males over 18 mandatory. A questionnaire will also become compulsory where each applicant must detail their willingness to serve.
This also fits into the war theme played out in TV series and films.
This is massive for the EU and Germany, being the holey of hoaxes beginning, and reparations are still happening. You can still serve prison time for saying the “holohoax” is a hoax.
This country was chosen on purpose as a testing ground.
With AI now taking the jobs, your civic duty will become a national duty, and this is where nationalism pushes the agenda.
All that is needed is a threat of war.
Dont worry, we and Russia have been through it more times than one.
With 186,000 German soldiers in NATO, they’re already on that warpath.
That Davies always appeared to be some sort of woke nudge unit spook. Perhaps he’s off playing golf with that fake TV doc who might have faked his death. I can picture them all with Whittey, Vallance, Hancock and Nicole Junkerman in the clubhouse arranging the next load of UK medical data to mine…
The BBC has always been the mouthpiece of TPTB but they wouldn’t get away with it if not for the staff.
I believe that, from top to bottom, the BBC is staffed by people who really believe that they’re doing God’s work on Earth.
Witness the furious denials of those forced out this week.
All made possible, of course, because of the dumbing down and nambifcation of the education system over the past 50+ years.
This is rather like a battle between MI6 and the emigre population of the Ukrainian/Russian Jewish mob in New York/Atlantic City.
There’s no chance that this is the good guys vs the bad guys.
It’s just one mob wanting to stick it to another mob and the other mob deciding how viciously to retaliate.
I’ve always found that David Attenborough misrepresents the lemurs of the Comoro Islands; lending instead, his well-metered calm and grandfatherly voice to advance the interests of the Madagascar variety of the species.
Oh yeah, he’s also a shill for the Climate Change alarmists, who misdirect concern for the anthropomorphic impacts of geo-engineering carried out by climate engineering scientists, profiteers and the military.
And no mention of their French Overlords.
someone should sue the BBC for defamation on behalf of the chemical element carbon
their constant smear campaign against this innocent atom should be worth trillions, not billions in damages
Nice try Kit.
‘fraid using Little Timmy Farron/Potato Davey/Graun Rusbridge & EU shill Femi to illustrate Orange Man Bad kinda proves there’s no objectivity in this article.
Why bother Kit? Because your alt media that is why.
When Panorama tried to set up nonaffiliated Tommy $hekal£tien, the alt screamed set up.
When heroes to the spastics, Musk outwitted the BBC little soyboy in an contrived irrelevant interview and not long after Musk of the people told the alt media on x “they was the media now” you all applauded, yet couldn’t see the psy op being played out.
Apr 28, 2023 — The head of the BBC resigned over his failure to disclose an alleged financial favor he did two years ago for then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson. The same people screamed. bo hoo
Every year it the same story repackaged and the same response as your hypnotized that is why they do the yearly BBC rituals on you.
Patroen is the new TV streaming service for the media mindcontrolled.
BBC is alternative media and alternative media is BBC online, you need each other to keep each alive and relevant services the mass;s with daily mind poison.
To pretend to be informed paying patroen up to $50 / euros a month in different subscription/ Patroen model to your alt media celebrity clown to keep up to date with irrelevant news like this Trump verse BBC soap-opera crap is mind-control.
For the die hard believers- Trump, Tommy $hekal£tien or Elon is being persecuted by the beep.
This then makes the operatives more appealing to the easily confused and then makes there alt media more truthful than the baddies MSM BBC, it so cheap a trick, hence why its repeated.
Media in all forms is the version of religion for the mass’s.
It amazes me that the primary prescription of choice in every GP’s surgery in the country for ‘mental health problems’ is not ‘cold turkey on all media for 3 months; 3 healthy meals a day; 5 miles of walking in the outdoors each and every day; 1000m swimming twice a week; no more than 8 units of alcohol per week; no smoking and no drugs; oh, and no being a groupie about anything or anyone on earth’.
None of that costs the NHS anything, unless you sub them a pair of walking boots every six months, a pass to the swimming pool and a few lessons in basic nutrition.
Just imagine incentivising GPs to reduce prescription drugs to an absolute minimum, eh?
How long before any politician suggesting that was outed as a sexually deviant, expenses-fiddling, Russia-consorting, climate-denying racist, eh?
What! $top the river$ of gold?
No way Jose.
Illness = profit$$$$$$$$.
Gotta look after your mates. And Masters:
https://www.newsweek.com/us-responds-gaza-military-base-claim-11033690
Regarding 911, the reporting of building 7 collapsing before it actually did has never made any sense. Why would a script be sent out to media outlets ahead of events, I can see no strategic value, only risks of leaks of false flag narratives, why not let them report on things organically as they unfold?
Perhaps because the compartmentalized compartments were not synchronized.
From my archive: “PROPAGANDA and the DEEP STATE – From False Flags to Military Grade PsyOp” – https://www.theburningplatform.com/2024/02/03/the-financial-jigsaw-part-2-chapter-3-propaganda-in-action-resistance-begins-holocaust-survivor-speaks-peaceful-resistance-wins-02-03-24/
https://austrianpeter.substack.com/
Like adding more bells and whistles to the gigantic distraction machine…
You are partly right. But we diverge a little when you say this “The BBC is worse than biased, it is a morally vacuous horseshit hosepipe, repeating “the truth” as it is dictated to them from on high.”
Yes, the BBC is biased.But not so much because of guidance from above, because there simply isn’t any. The BBC is an institution of incompetent, self serving junior managers all jockeying for position.
What that means is the so called ‘reporters’ hiding behind the lofty title of ‘journalist’ get to say and print their personal opinions, rather than report facts.
Their managers have no interest in it being true or factual. They do like sensational though.
This is the way the BBC has worked all around the world for probably 30 years or more.
Sadly there was a time in the 80s when the BBC was a reliable source of news. So it is (or was) possible.
To appropriateness an old adage “Truth is the first casualty of the BBC”
Not to mention the sky-high (!) salaries for the BBC top, some public ‘service’. A public woman is waaaaay cheaper money wise, not morally, but is not subsidized by a mandatory tax/ license fee for all.
The Guardian has morphed in a printed version of this woke Pravda brainwash, but financed differently.
This and so much else is truly a desperate attempt to ensure the population remain under the belief that there is conflict, alternative ideas, choice and the revelation of the uni-regiem of covid era , never happened.
Countless AI created videos are all over utube for the purpose of “giving voice” to the concerns of the plebs on the living tax, economy, social collapse etc etc
But it’s all curated, fake as AI and lies.
If the fertility collapse is real it represents the ultimate peasants uprising. Nobody wants any part of anything in modernity.
Just because I KNOW the COMMENTS
are GOING to be GOLD on THIS ONE. 😎👍
You are welcome. From BBC?
Welcome, for what?
I didn’t thank anyone
for anything. 🙄
You’re asking if I came to
read comments from the
BBC? Given the 2 MAIN losers
in this DISTRACTION story, “Orange
Boy” and The UK’s version of CNN
and FOX combined, The comments
are mostly what I expected to see.
Many of them very on point, btw.
SOME of the folks that COMMENT in here
(AND these days EVERY comment section or chat group, etc.😔) are JUST sad ass people, OR AI bot farm TROLL accounts, but I come here because MANY of you actually HAVE really INSIGHTFUL comments to add to the conversation about the articles here. And THAT’S WHY I come here, at ALL. because it AIN’T for ALL the CONTRIBUTORS on here. SOME of the “ARTICLE” submissions on here… siiiggghh. SOME of y’all KNOW what I’m talking about.
I come to see and read the opinions of the ACTUAL public on these subjects VERSUS what MORE often than NOT in this world today tends to be just another piece of propaganda to sway folks’s opinions to someone’s agenda.
~The Jackal
Tell Them
🖕🤨🖕
#NoMore !
“Because I said so !” **
is being replaced by
“Because AI said so !!”
** Me mum’s favourite saying…
If you’re old enough to have been an adult before the internet, you’ll already have come across extensive rewriting of historical fact by AI. If I have to trust my own lived experience vs what some algorithm tells me happened 40 years before they were programmed by a techie nerd born 20 years after it happened, it’s not exactly a contest, is it?
A perfect moment for the UK public to get rid off their ancient BBC personal propaganda tax / TV license fee.
Bond had a license to kill, BCC had a license to lie (lie sense) – both history now.
Any Robin Hood copycats alive still?
Who abolished ASAID?
Who pulled out of The Paris CO2 treaty?
Who pulled out of the WHO?
Who minimized the federal US Department of education?
Who halted the invasion of the US by illegals?
Who managed the Abraham accords?
Who stopped trans operations on teenagers?
Sure, the US state Department’s Ukraine mess is still burning. Swamp creatures in the Atlantic “intelligence” agencies had to keep their budgets topped up (while closing eyes for the CCP); the Anglos still only produce wheat and weapons.
Epstein and Trump > 25 years ago? Biden was sniffing kids live on TV and the woke were silent. Who made shady family business deals with Ukraine and PR China: Biden. Not that the Rinos were any better: gilded grifters the lot.
Most of that was due to the Trump admin following the blueprint of Project 2025, however it’s simply untrue that illegal immigration has been halted. The number of apprehensions are down, but it hasn’t stopped. And trans operations haven’t been stopped on teenagers, those controlling Trump have pressured hospitals and tried to stop funding. Big deal. Especially compared with “who” has used tariffs indiscriminately to raise taxes on the American people while trashing the economy; who is raising the national debt at the highest rate ever; who claims to be the mastermind of Operation Warpspeed which continues to kill and injure millions of people; who is in the pockets of zionist Israel and has been instrumental in the Gaza genocide; who has conducted illegal murders of fishermen from Venezuela and used the fake drug war as an excuse to enact regime change in Venezuela to get at their oil; who gave 20 billion to the right wing President of Argentina to bail him out and help his billionaire buddies with their “investments” in that country while denying food stamps to the poor in the US; who wants to raid Colombia and Nigeria for their oil; who raised the DOD budget to over a trillionaire per year and wants to rename it the Dept of War; who is aiding and abetting the technocratic billionaires in their quest for CBDCs and Digitial IDs, etc., etc., etc.
Ya, Biden was and is a criminal scumbag, but so is Trump. It’s total hypocrisy to rail on Biden but support Trump, the private oligarchy owned republican party, and his Project 2025 and zionist controllers. That’s just as bad as the liberals railing on Trump but supporting the democratic party and its billionaire controllers.
Who just sent a letter to the Israeli President requesting a pardon for the war criminal Nutandyahoo? Oh ya, zionist Trump. Those supporting that bastard are supporting the Gaza genocide no matter how many teenager “trans operations” are stopped.
”While I absolutely respect the independence of the Israeli Justice System, and its requirements, I believe that the ‘case’ against Bibi, who has fought alongside me for a long time, including against the very tough adversary of Israel, Iran, is a political, unjustified prosecution, I hereby call on you to fully pardon Benjamin Netanyahu.”
The BBC might have been ‘leftwing’ when George Orwell worked there. He probably would be amused by the inversion of terms evident by calling it ‘leftwing’ today.
The Beeb was always pure Establishment, “his Master’s voice”, Pravda with bells and whistles. Left and right are just Its two legs, like Whigs and Tories.
Two carriages heading for the same destination, splashing mud on each other along the way.
Not my analogy.
We go from case to case and in this case Trump is right!
I hope he gets his 1 billion because this is deserved to BBC and their Leftist scum bias We-Good everybody else Bad.
Yes MSM all says the same giving them from above. An old story see here from 20219: https://youtu.be/487CRdRHEeI No independent journalism! Because of the attempting tool to create narratives to the public by MSM’s owners.
The funny thing, but not really, is the silver spoon draft dodging pedo in Chief is the biggest liar on the planet at this point. No one has more opportunity to spout constant lies far and wide than he does, and he does it on a daily and constant basis. His lies are so prolific it’s become a sick joke in itself. So, what’s worse, a fucking cult leader of the most dangerous country on the planet who lies and spreads propaganda about everything, or another media propaganda outlet. His latest about “affordability” in the U.S. hits a new low even his MIGA cult is having a hard time with,
“Every price is down,” he said Thursday. “Everything is way down,” he said at another Thursday event. “Prices are down under the Trump administration, and they’re down substantially,” he said Friday, adding, “Everybody knows that it’s far less expensive under Trump than it was under Sleepy Joe Biden. And the prices are way down.”
Uh, for those that don’t live in the US, no, they’re not.
Twilight zone shit.
His blustering buffoonery is beyond belief.
God save the USA, cause no one else gives a shit.
Oh, there are plenty of us that give a shit, it’s just that between the Maga cult, who are fake patriots at best, and the woke liberal cult, they get all the attention. A good number of the chickenshit Trump cult on here, of which I’m enjoying jabbing with who and what they’re really supporting. And they don’t like that. Truth hurts.
So what’s the answer, Al ?
Serious question.
In UK. The answer is Lowe, before you ask.
The only answer I can see is revolution. As has been said many times, we aren’t going to vote our way out of this, and I think it’s because, at least in the US, the political system is completely corrupt and designed to keep the rich in power. If that doesn’t change, I don’t see the core issues changing other than thru serious long term turmoil. There must be some real fundamental changes in the US including a complete revamping and reduction in size of the federal government and a return to state rights. I’m not familiar with what or who Lowe is.
What about how those Jan6 demonstrators have suffered? Incarceration without trial. Loss of jobs, bank accounts. Cancellation. Murder for one of them. Suicide for 5 or 6 of them.