Money for Nothing
Niall McCrae
British people are glum and grumbling after Rachel Reeves’ budget, but what did they expect? They should know by now that government is an extortion racket.
While many voters regret their decision in last year’s general election, die-hard Labour supporters continue to make excuses: Tory mismanagement and Brexit ruined the economy. Daily Mail readers, meanwhile, have been told that the budget has taken from hard-working families to give to benefit claimants.
This is exactly what the powers-that-be want people to believe, not only as the old divide-and-rule strategy, but because society needs to understand that jobs are disappearing rapidly, and the future is basic universal income and total dependence on the state.
The looming technocracy has no use for the majority of the workforce. Data and distribution centres will be run by robots. Artificial intelligence will rise through the occupational strata to replace professional practitioners such as lawyers and doctors.
Call it new technology
And they use it to burn
And they show no concern
Work for their prosperity
While the big wheels turn
Now it’s too late to learn
Don’t upset the teacher
Though we know he lied to you
Don’t upset the preacher
He’s gonna close his eyes for youAnd it’s a shame
That you’re so afraid
Just a worker waiting in the pouring rain
Putting back the pieces of a broken dreamFather worked in industry
Now the work has moved on
And the factory’s gone
See them sell your history
Where once you were strong
And you used to belong
There was once a future
For a working man
There was once a lifetime
For a skillful hand – yesterday
Prophetic words by the band Erasure, back in 1986. But most people do not heed the warnings, preferring to shoot the messenger.
A talented OffGuardian writer, Todd Hayen, has decided to stop writing due to the abusive responses to his latest article on the persistent faith of citizens in government and in official narratives. He used the term ‘sheep’ for the easily herded folk who take the vaccines and believe in the scripted saviours and bogeymen.
Funny how the same people can be utterly convinced that their own pet catastrophes—Trump returning to power, climate change, systemic racism, white supremacy, overpopulation, or the rise of the far right—are existential threats that will end life as we know it unless we surrender every freedom immediately to stop them. But mention digital id, central bank digital currencies, vaccine passports, social credit systems, or the creeping transhumanist agenda, and suddenly you’re the paranoid one wearing a tinfoil hat.
The threats to humanity are – or at least should be – emphatically clear. A digital prison is being built around us, with the implicit consent of the ‘sheep’, who still think that technology will solve our problems. Convenience, security and efficiency are prized over meaningful social interaction, privacy and freedom. As Hayen explained, this delusion was primed long ago:
Most of them have been psychologically and educationally groomed for decades to believe that socialism, Marxism, or outright communism are not only benign but morally superior. ‘From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs’ sounds noble when you’ve never watched the state decide what your needs actually are. They think communism is free healthcare, student-debt forgiveness, and government UBI cheques. They have no idea it’s secret police at 3 a.m., neighbours denouncing neighbours for extra bread rations, gulags, re-education camps, forced confessions, and a boot stamping on a human face—forever.
I am no less against global corporate capitalism and fascism as I am of leftist totalitarianism, but merely a minority of critical thinkers see through the Left versus Right paradigm. Ask a progressive liberal student whether she’d expect a fascist government to give free money to everyone in society, of whatever colour or creed, and she’d probably scoff at such a ridiculous notion. Welfare is a thing of the Left – that’s how younger generations are taught to love Big Brother.
Britons are led to believe that the government will always be there as a safety net, when the jobs are gone. Therefore, they don’t threaten aa uprising on the throwing of taxpayers’ money at Ukraine or on the perpetual influx – a million every year – of immigrants whose cheap labour will be a temporary pursuit.
The budget is misunderstood by the majority as a giveaway to the workshy. It is really setting the scene for digitally-controlled UBI, and everything else is a sideshow. Or as Erasure called it, ‘The Circus’.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Yes most Brits have been programmed to believe that – even though their government might be up to no good in some fields – that basically the government has their best interests at heart – which is a lie, however no matter how hard and clear you present your points, they just won’t budge on that perspective – maybe its a generational thing.
As Noam Chomsky once said or word to that effect, Whatever you think your government is up to – they are up to far worse than you think.
The end game is full-time surveillance, control, and ultimately removal.
As for Mr Hayden’s decision – to stop penning his articles in here, bloggers will always have negative feed back to some articles, you need to be a bit thick skinned in this game, I’ve seen the likes of Kit Klarenberg, Max Blumenthal, David Miller, Aaron Mate, Craig Murray and many more hit with negative comments, some even from establishment trolls paid to do so, but they just shrug it off – and get back on the saddle, I’m sure Mr Hayden will get back on the saddle again at some point.
‘ Artificial intelligence will rise through the occupational strata to replace professional practitioners such as lawyers and doctors.’
Good riddance!
(Whether AI will do the job as required is another topic worth discussion)
What’s going to happen when people across the Earth demand that their elected political leaders publicly state and explain their positions, for or against: digital id, central bank digital currencies, vaccine passports, social credit systems, and the creeping transhumanist agenda?
The time when the world’s people loudly express such a serious, legitimate demand is clearly now.
What will happen when we demand the “elected political leaders publicly state” their positions on the unfolding technocracy? Why those politicians will do what politicians always do in such circumstances – “they will lie to us” – boldly – and unflinchingly and as convincingly as possible. The job of the political class is to serve oligarchy – not to serve we citizens.