The electronic cottage: how technology causes family breakdown
Niall McCrae
Photo by A. C. on Unsplash
Alvin Toffler, whose prophetic book Future Shock (1970) primed sociologists and politicians for radical change to society as a result of technological advances, was in a position ten years later to show how much of his vision was being realised.
In The Third Wave: the Revolution that will Change Our Lives (1980) he described how the industrial economy was sinking and taking the family structure down with it.
In the First Wave of human organisation (the agricultural revolution) three or more generations lived together as a family unit. The Second Wave (the industrial revolution) created the nuclear family, and Toffler saw that the coming Third Wave would undermine and eventually destroy this living arrangement. Conservative-minded readers might want to shoot the messenger, but undoubtedly Toffler was right on how conventional families would disintegrate.
At the school gates today, there are single mothers, gay and lesbian parents, older relatives and various arrangements under child custody orders, and in some areas a stable home of mum and dad bringing up children is the exception rather than the rule.
In a time of exploding change – with personal lives being torn apart, the existing social order crumbling, and a fantastic new way of life emerging on the horizon – asking the very largest of questions about our future is not merely a matter of intellectual curiosity. It is a matter of survival.
Just as industry is being outmoded by the ‘technosphere’, the nuclear family would be replaced in the ‘sociosphere’ of the Third Wave. In his chapter ‘Families of the Future’, Toffler decried political leaders (at the time, Jimmy Carter) for pledging to restore family values. He criticised the tendency to place fault in individual people or to blame rock music, pornography or feminism for family breakdown. The only way to save the idealised family would be to reverse technological progress.
The Third Wave was already happening, Toffler observed: millions of Americans living alone, single parents, a steadily rising population of divorcees, cohabiting (rather than married) couples, households with children of different parents, and homosexual relationships. In this ‘maze of kinship arrangements’, no single form would dominate. Toffler predicted homosexual couples raising children and speculated on the possibility of cloning.
Describing the ‘electronic cottage’, Toffler correctly anticipated working from home on computers, although his illustration was influenced by heterosexual norms and the manufacturing economy:
–
We might find both husband and wife taking turns at monitoring a complex manufacturing process on the console screen, four hours on, four hours off.
Foreseeing dramatic change to working lives, Toffler argued that technology was the determinant of how people live together (or apart). Indeed, ‘the very definition of love would be transformed’.
Communes, popular in the 1960s and 70s, mostly failed, but Toffler predicted the rise of extended families evolving in the electronic economy.
Networks of expanded families could supply some needed business or social service. Internally, they might or might not share sex across marriage lines. They might or might not be heterosexual. They might be childless or childful.
Politicians should embrace change rather than row against the tide, Toffler opined.
The decision to live outside a nuclear family framework should be made easier not harder.
Conservative commentators warn of civilisational collapse, but Toffler was optimistic that people would adapt and willingly participate in the creation of a new civilisation. Klaus Schwab’s ‘Great Reset’ was simply building on the blueprint for a new society envisaged by the shocking futurist.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.






“Never spank da divine women’s
innocent buttcheeks again, strictly
forbidden, because sexist abuse!”
https://archive.is/lKvk8
A divine woman would unlikely be gagging for it (unlike some others). I’m guessing that’s the essential point?
Interesting question that puts “culture”
(learned) versus biology (innate) to the
test. Doesn’t every woman long to be do-
minated by a man, especially the “diva”?
Asked differently: Do we belong to the
animal kingdom (“primates”), or are we
a “divine” species? If the latter is true,
why is the world a zoo ruled by monkeys?
Even the so-called “humanism,” which
denies any kind of “divinity,” turns out
on closer inspection to be a mechanism
of exclusion that denies animals the ca-
pacity for soulfulness. Yet we know that
(at least “pets”) are often more “human”
than “humans!” That’s why I dare to ask
the counter-question: How many “divine
women” have you encountered in your li-
fe so far (and remained faithful to you!)?
You are – of course – free to answer this
not in “biological,” but in “cultural” terms!
Many old people, in lieu of having families, find themselves banding together to help one another–almost as if by accident. The individualistic ethos they grew up with, however, prevents them from really getting out there and working totally together. Would that they could.
I believe it is just generally a case of being ‘out there’ in your local street/neighborhood. Others will know if/when you’ve been out and some (more observant types) will even miss you when you’re gone. Even if you just stood on your doorstep greeting passersby randomly
Heaven forfend anybody being “influenced by heterosexual norms.”
THE ABOVE PHOTO SAYS A LOT/
BUT SO DID LAST SATURDAY;
Deluded 1.1
Just a common sense reminder that if you bring your cell phone to the STOP DIGITAL ID march, you will be tracked, scanned, and added to multiple lists.
What a c 🚾 nt needing to do live videos on 5G smart phone telling everyone how opposed they are to DIGITAL ID.
Right. So I left it at home. Where does that leave world progress?
Hypocrite
Your have a trannies and gay and dkyes doing vol work in promoting your shit light woke right MSM + mag.
Lead by example rather than moaning like a politician.
Good piece. What does a ‘family’ mean anyway in the modern era?
True. The idea that there is nothing greater than economic growth – and for individuals to be aligned to wealth generation – isn’t new. It has simply been sharpened.