The Epstein Files: More of the Empire’s “created reality”?
Is this programmed witch hunt really what distrusting the establishment looks like?
Kit Knightly
The only thing anyone wants to talk about is the Epstein files, the millions of documents and emails released by the US government concerning the *ahem* late Jeffrey Epstein and his many high-profile correspondents.
That this is all the MSM wish to discuss is hardly surprising, they are the mouth to the establishment brain. But that it should also so totally dominate the alternate media I find a little concerning.
Have we really learned anything at all?
Chomsky is a villain for being friendly, Finkelstein a hero for telling Epstein to go to hell. Mandelson has resigned. Again. Bill Gates got an STD. Elon is “too autistic” to be a peadophile (and accidentally confirmed the emails were real. Oops).
Ever predictably, the whole thing has turned into an exercise in taking sides.
People are doing word searches for their favourites and keeping score. Starmer is mentioned 33 times, Farage 41, Putin over a thousand.
The binaries extend to geopolitics.
While the MSM pundits are pushing “Epstein was a Russian agent working with Putin”, the people who know better want to talk about Maxwell, Mossad and Israel.
There’s no denying that the latter has the benefit of being at least partially true, but both – to me – fall into the trap of letting the terms of discussion be set from above.
I suppose the question I keep coming back to in my head is, “Why should we accept anything in these emails is meaningful?”
All we have here is what the US Department of Justice wants us to have. Vetted, redacted, or even invented.
We should assume it is, at best, irrelevant and at worst entirely misleading. Propaganda as much as anything else that passes from the FBI to the DOJ to the New York Times. A story with a purpose.
And yet, there is a fevered quasi-witch hunt atmosphere, best demonstrated by the outraged responses to statements like this:
Being mentioned in the Epstein files is not a sign of wrongdoing
— Sky News (@SkyNews) January 31, 2026
…which is nothing but true. Simply being mentioned a handful of times in millions of pages of documents, the vast majority of which appear to be unrelentingly mundane, is not an indication of a crime.
I would even argue that tweet was testing a conditioned response. For years they hype up the witch-hunt crowd, then they say “guys, just because your neighbour’s crops survived the drought, doesn’t make them a witch”.
And when people inevitably scream back “Yes it does! Burn the witch!”, they smile at a job well done.
I’ve been thinking about the famous quote from Karl Rove:
‘We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out.
If anything I’ve found the reaction to the Epstein dump almost disheartening, because it shows how susceptible we are to the Empire creating our reality and smiling down as we study it.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
electronicintifada.net/content/latest-epstein-document-dump-one-more-cover/51232
Who has the time to go through all the documents.?
Epstein was a “limited hangout.” The things that have been revealed (rape, torture etc) will continue. The people Epstein worked for, will not be revealed. Epstein is emblematic of the morality of the ruling class.This imperialist ruling class that Epstein served, see the rest of humanity as disposable things, to be used, abused and destroyed as they see fit.
If those in power wanted to release genuine information why did it take so long?
Answer: Even for the legions of US intelligence its takes time to write this much.
It is called gaslighting. Why such an awful spectacle including rape and cannibalism. Because so many sins of the past have now been made ‘normal’ and only extremes are left to demonize people.
Think for moment. If you accumulated everything you have written in your lifetime how many pages could you fill. I would guess my total would be less than 200,000. Probably less than 100,000. Epstein, 3,000,000 with more to come. He would not have had time to molest, rape and eat babies. Think a bit.
We are catching a glimpse of something previously hidden; why downplay these scandalous revelations?
The Hard Truths Revealed by the Epstein Files
Talking of Epstein diddy.
This site has its own Diddy Epstein and he is famous for it.
Cant wait to see Rollings crock big exposure. 😭
Please watch this youtube and understand that the big industrialists will determine morality.
And gets an explanation about big money in this case.
“Epstein-Leaks onthullen spin in SDG-Web | Rypke Zeilmaker | Boekbespreking”.
I would highly recommend reading EscapeKey’s analysis of the matter. Crazy how interconnected he was.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein
One Nation Under Blackmail The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Organized Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein Vol. 1 and 2by Whitney Alyse Webb.
refuted that.
Chomsky has always been a charlatan. Nobody should be surprised.
Kit,
You are missing one of the important points of the Epstein files.
Look at the Executive Summary of this site:
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate
advance pandemic planning, Man. look at it.
the people who know better want to talk about Maxwell, Mossad and Israel.
That aint got to work with us.
What your mean real journalist who have written over 1000 pages with citation references and sources to put in 2 book volumes set or your repost of a couple of GCHQ shills twits 8 years after that fact.
I’m quite simply amazed at how so many ‘people’ see one picture or a few words and immediately say that XXXX is guilty of some heinous crime.
I’m not saying Andrew Windsor has not committed crimes, he may very well have done, but a single picture of him kneeling next to a young girl/woman lying on her back is not evidence of statutory rape, is it? He may very well have committed statutory rape if she was below the legal age of consent wherever they were and they had sex, even it were consensual. But one picture is not proof that any judge should accept.
It’s quite amazing that LBC has come out heavy on Epstein being a Putin asset, using the utterly trustworthy and truthful Christopher Steele as their main source for ‘inside information from MI6’, as if that organisation of professional liars and overseas mobsters were supposed to be equivalent in truthfulness to the most holy of holy devotees. It does beg the question as to whether Andrew Marr is a security services drone, doesn’t it?
I’m also quite frankly appalled to hear that the Mandelson Affair is ‘the biggest political scandal’ of Piers Morgan’s lifetime. I’d say that Blair lying to Parliament to get the UK involved in extrajudicial killing of 1 million Iraqis was rather more serious, just as the UK Government aiding and abetting the genocidal psychopaths of the apartheid State of Israel in committing war crimes, ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza was.
I”d like Emily Maitlis and Sheila Fogarty to explain why the heinous sexual abuse, trafficking and rape of women is a more serious matter than the genocide of tens of thousands of Palestinian children. If they even think there is anything to discuss there, it shows that they have obsessional bees in their bonnets and have lost all sense of what the most serious crimes in life are. Ending a human life illegally, especially a child’s life, is more serious than raping a girl/woman. Neither is anything other than repugnant.
What is absolutely clear now with social media videos dominating information sharing is that lying headlines are becoming ever more frequent and there is no punishment for using them. Indeed there is a punishment in monetary terms for saying ‘Nothing to see here’, because scandal creates clickbait.
The only true thing I have heard recently is ‘something is important if a human being feels it is important enough to tell you about it to your face’.
One X too many. But yes, XXX have been and is the cause of endless crimes and criminality, as true as I am sitting here down in my mother’s basement.
Epstein’s employers are the same employers as employ the US government. And the UK government. Epstein’s job was to keep all of them, all of them, in line by making videos of them fucking little girls and sometimes killing little girls. These videos are then used to blackmail the US government and the UK government to do whatever their employers ask of them–especially if it is evil and depraved and aids in genocide.
You’d have thought governments would get wise to that practice pretty quickly, and/or eliminate Epstein pretty quickly?
But then they’d have no parties to attend. Where’s the fun in that?
Huh? Do you know anything about how government works?
So Governments serve up their employees to blackmailers who then blackmail the government and the government let’s this continue for some reason? That doesn’t make much sense to me, perhaps I’m misreading?
Government employees? You think he blackmails government employees? You gotta be joking.
Blackmail loses it’s currency to influence the blackmail victim (‘Faustingly’ willing or otherwise) once revealed.
Whoever is in possession of genuinely salacious, insidious and/or damning blackmail material will not relinquish the material if it is determined that the material still has currency to influence.
What has been revealed so far is just a taste. To keep the blackmail “victims” (how these monsters could be called “victims” i don’t know) on their toes. There is much worse that could be revealed. But they’re saving that as long as these “victims” toe the line. You know who “they” are, don’t you?
Years ago Sibel Edmonds said as much on a James Corbett interview.
Sibel worked for or with the FBI in the investigation of honey-pot schemes in Washington DC. (among other things)
She said that at one point, her group were told to “stand down” on what they discovered on video and such.
“They” did not want to prosecute the offenders, they wanted to keep the videos as leverage.
That explained a lot.
They are more interested in controlling politicians than putting them in jail.
Re my 3.22pm comment is this Epstein being whisked away alive from prison in his Orange Jumpsuit.
Monitor𝕏 (@MonitorX99800): “https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/1f1fa-1f1f8.svghttps://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/26a1.svg- Newly released Department of Justice documents show that investigators reviewing surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein’s death observed an orange-colored shape moving up a staircase toward the isolated, locked tier where Epstein’s cell was located at approximately 10:39 p.m. on Aug. 9, 2019.” | nitter.poast.org
Is this Epstein in this piccy or is it a fake, and Epstein is dead, you decide.
Monitor𝕏 (@MonitorX99800): “https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/1f1ee-1f1f1.svghttps://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/26a1.svg- Photos taken in Israel show what appears to be Jeffrey Epstein with new makeup and accompanied by two bodyguards. Photo is going viral on social media.” | nitter.poast.org
IMHO Epstein ain’t dead. He’s still regarded as a “disgraced billionaire” by the media – a necessary facade if he is to enjoy any measure of sympathetic regard among the limited cadre protecting his identity while in “witness protection”/retirement.
Yes if you look at the photo again – you can see two of the minders (Guys) with him, have ear pieces in – similar to what security services personnel use.
Ear rings? You get more and more mysterious.
Was Epstein a …ehhh a new? or a due? or was he a doo? And thats why he is in Israel now, Yes? Or no?
Its just that yr comment makes more questions than answers.
What a coincidence: new FED chairman, precious metals crash, Iran almost war, Epstein files, Yen turmoil, the orange one opening his mouth…. certainly there are more new instances added to Chaos.
I think in the end Epstein drama will be one big beautiful Nothingburger. From supposed moral high-ground public will condemn moral degeneracy of the elites, but all in all that will be a lame meaningless ritual of complacency.
Another important aspect of Epstein drama is Learned Helplessness.
Elites can do anything, literally anything, while we are merely NPCs in their game. What can we do about it beside being righteously indignant? We might get some crumbs from their table and people that are used (indoctrinated) to be satisfied with crumbs will feel this as a victory.
And please, spare me from proposals of what to do that belong, using a military lingo, to the operational level. I’m interested in strategic level.
Anyhow, I would love to be wrong in this case.
Unfortunately, I don’t think you are.
Dear Administrators,
Please explain to me, why my comment was marinated for more than 12 hours, while some others posting after me have been approved?
And it’s not the first time.
Are my comments really so hard to digest?
No need to post this comment, you have my email and you can answer me privately.
It got diverted to spam. This happens sometimes.
You don’t have to ask in such an unfriendly manner you know, unless you think that’s a good use of your energy? Peace Mik. 😃 A2
not entirely convincing, but I will spare my energy. Peace Sam.
I think this is turning massive.Already Dick Dastardly been dumped by labour.He will be cleaned ready for his job on GMTV.
UK MSM proclaiming Starmer’s imminent demise. Et tu Polly? (She still manages to be sickening by calling Starmer “decent” as if Jimmy Savile didn’t happen).
Will it be Raynor or Burnham who fronts for Streeting, the UK’s man at Bilderberg?…. Streeting is so voter repellent he nearly lost a safe seat during a landslide – but he’s the one who knows the plan (up to a point).
Can’t we just have a regional technate run by AI and get rid of all these flawed humans? The game’s really afoot when some of the MSM start down this line.
You get what you arsed for.
Reading 3.5 million pages of this document dump would take approximately 25 to 30 years, if reading for 8 hours every single day. Reading 100 pages every day would take 96 years.
Who does that?
AI I would suppose.A few human lifespans rolled into one. Highlighting those aspects for pure human consideration. Seemingly then, at least, of some value
Put some key words into the search.
AI. AI is the superior Intelligence of this planet of whom you can ask everything.
You have finally met your ultimate Nanny. You dont have to be responsible for anything anymore.
You can live the sweet life and let AI nanny do the hard work…………………LOL.
They gonna employ a team of very clever monkeys to read them.
The FBI ?
Even without the benefit of AI, an internet of 3.5 million users or more could review the trove of material in 1 day.
That said, any material (intelligence reports, court documents, testimony) released by the DOJ which has passed hands through the FBI or CIA, should be regarded with the utmost incredulity. All 3 agencies have well-demonstrated to have brokered in falsehood.
The mediated reality beyond that which we experience firsthand necessarily deserves objective scrutiny.
Question: How long did it take to download the files.?
The only thing anyone wants to talk about is the Epstein files???
When Whitney Webb started to bring this to light before she published her books.
You as a platform never once mentioned it.
Now it has become saturated news, you comment on it.
How are you any different than MSM?
Yeah ! I keep asking myself “why doesnt 0ffG ever discuss crop circles
and the numerous reports of UFO sightings ? And how is OffG any different
than MSM ? I came to this site with expectations and OffG always lets
me down !! If OffG doesnt pick up its game soon, i’ll take my expectations
somewhere else !!
The little man’s revenge. “I will never buy bread here anymore if you guys dont do it my way. First I was afraid……………….https://youtu.be/6dYWe1c3OyU .
Whitney is awesome!
The British media are desperately trying to hype the Mandelson thing, as the story of the century, even though even the public knew many of the details years ago, so not really a news story at all. Note also that years on, still no resignations, except Johnson’s, about the ‘covid’ dictatorship, all based on quack science – but now an Ambassador seeing Epstein more than a decade ago is somehow a huge scandal. This morning, the Guardian seemed to have told all their columnists to say it is curtains for Starmer and apparently their ‘readers’ seem to think so, BTL, or at least the ones their censors allow through. So the whole thing is highly suspicious. The string-pullers plainly want a new PM, and so the media are peddling fakery by the deep state to give the pretext, with the faked ‘polls’ to suggest public support. Another day in the UK non-democracy. Oh, and by the way, where is the outrage that two men of Mandelson’s and Epstein’s cultural background are being targeted here?
Yes, the ‘Mandelson Files’ do smell of pitiful me-too mimicry in relation to the ‘Epstein Files’. Has the UK really fallen that low?
Angela Raynor would seem to be being geared to be next woman-in-chief. Starmer a faceless, backbone-less non-entity from the outset, so unlikely to be missed, if so.
A PM with more media presence perhaps is what is required.
Those few dozens of white US underage Epstein girls are nothing compared to the hundreds of thousands similar in the UK gang raped by Pakistani-“British” old men. Strarmer looked the other way then, and now: the scandal of the millennium.
When are we gonna get THE files that count?
You know, how much the $uiturd$ are rewarded/paid/bribed by the MIC, Big pHarmer, Big Ag and the Financial sector. It must amount to billions.
How many politicians have walked off into the mega lucrative sunset of corporate boards, directorships and consultancies.
We already know many/most of them are corruptible, financially and sexually. It’s just a question of how much.
The files that cunt. See what I said?
‘We the People’ want it smashed right on the frontpages into our faces inside our little homes.
Whatever this ‘reveal’ is, it is more circus from those that bring you bread and circuses on a daily basis.
In order to ‘Build Back Better’, first the controllers need to destroy confidence in the current system. Chipping away at the political system, national and international institutions and the very foundations of society and the system as a whole.
For example, look at the Mandy photo; him standing there in his budgie smugglers with an unknown WOMAN. Call that a revelation? Really? He bats for the other team, so it is hardly compromat, not exactly a ‘gotcha’ moment. He will sail off into the yonder, to enjoy a well remunerated retirement for his services rendered to the cause, as will many other senior cast members.
Look out for more great ‘revelations’, all designed to discredit the current system. The controllers will have the serfs begging for a clean broom to sweep the detritus away by the time that they have finished. Of course, they will offer their pre-packaged solution to satisfy the public outrage (reaction).
In order to understand where this is going, rather than rummaging around in the weeds, is to look for those who come out of this smelling of roses. Possibly some new faces or current known names who will rise up on the world stage as paragons of virtue. These will be sold to the masses as the new brooms to sweep away the old establishment and usher in a New World Order of utopian honesty, trust, confidence and hope all managed by a technocratic ‘elite’ And everyone will live happily ever after or so they will think until the digital gulag shuts its doors for good on the inmates trapped inside.
But it is important to have the ritual of an inquiry before burying the matter. Remember the covid inquiry?
“For example, look at the Mandy photo”
Sure, but what was on Mandelson’s clipboard when talking to the lady in the bathrobe. A menu choice for lunch, choice of massage, or choice of future Prime Minister beyond Brown?
In order to ‘Build Back Better’, first the controllers need to destroy confidence in the current system. Chipping away at the political system, national and international institutions and the very foundations of society and the system as a whole.
What are you talking about? In the real world, not the internet world,
most hardworking, tax-paying normal folks all think your current system is corrupt as hell.
Any confidence was lost during COVID, and the outsider party is also just another normal political party with ex-members of the other parliament members who got sacked or resigned, pretending to be outsiders.
It’s not my system.
Dream on.
Six years on and have you see the masses on the streets with their pitchforks chasing down politicos, health officials, members of the medical profession and executives from Pfizer, Moderna, AZ, J&J, Gamaleya Institute and Sinopharm?
Most are still stuck within the geopolitical and party political pick-a-side choices offered to them.
Get real man.You have to understand one thing: Internet is today the REAL world.
What is outside full of ticks, dirt and unpleasant things is an illusion world.
Russia and China have the moral high ground when compared to the decaying decadent West. But they should not gloat as their day will come. Like the West their economies are exploitive, emotionally exploitive, physically exploitive, spiritually exploitive.
Their fate is to degenerate like the West (with its enforced morality for the exploited masses), as is the fate of every system based on exploitation of others. Exploitation penetrates into every nook and cranny of both societies. ‘Let him who isnt exploitive cast the first stone’ sayeth The Lord.
Not RUSSIA!!!!!! again? Isn’t that a little old and tired? In fact, Putin was one of the few who refused to meet with Epstein, presumably based on reliable intelligence.
But yes the really important details, especially the Intelligence connections and methods plus contacts with the real insiders will have been cut long ago. What we have is a little like the Covid offering through the Overton window : It’s either a Zoonotic leap or a leak from Wuhan. No other options allowed. It’s their SOP.
This piece today from the esc Substack provides an informative background on who Epstein was and how he operated:
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein
The Rabid Empire and vassals accused Russia of child kidnap and murder. ICC agreed and insulted Putin with an arrest warrant. Like the White Helmets in Iraq and Syria, White Angels do the field work in Ukraine. Though only a side income from imperialism, organised terrorism and weather disasters, it is a big old global operation. Victims may be abused sexually; this suits blackmail, important to rabid capitalism. Or they may be killed for body parts traded internationally. As Putin said recently, the vampires’ ball (party) is ending.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/who-weaponizes-children-russia-ukraine-conflict/5914690
https://www.globalresearch.ca/epstein-files-contain-child-abuse-murder/5914478
https://www.globalresearch.ca/epstein-files-kosovo-narco-terrorists-helped-traffic-over-a-million-children-for-deranged-western-elites/5914698
https://www.globalresearch.ca/i-c-c-arrest-warrant-for-vladimir-putin-for-kidnapping-ukrainian-children-borders-on-ridicule/5812752
Recently? Two years ago and I have not seen the Western party showing signs to stop, what these Epstein files are a proof on. Putin blowing himself up to wishful dreaming.
Epstein specialty: throw around big names every second sentence of people he had honey-trapped on video and playing financial wizard with that leverage.
Conman first class.
Head up on the next scare called “Niprah virus”: this occurred in North East India and had two fatalities.
What they don’t tell you is that it only spreads if you eat fruits from a tree that were first nibbled by fruit bats: it doesn’t spread otherwise.
How many people do this in the West? Zero? Even in India it is close to 0.00001%.
What they don’t tell you is that there is no evidence for the existence of any virus, with or without bat cooties
What a Godsend the Epstein Files is to anyone thinking of setting-up a
cleanskin political party to run in the next election to become the government !
All the party has to do is focus the electorate’s attention on two simple slogans:
‘Starmer gets thirty-three mentions in The Epstein (Dirt) Files;
Farage gets forty-four mentions in The Epstein (Dirt) Files…
……. That’s all it needs to say, as voters vivid imagination will feverishly supply
the lurid missing details…
After all, the allegation against someone of ‘child sexual abuse’ requires using
one’s imagination to provide the details…
NB. ‘… thirty-three mentions, SO FAR, or, forty-four mention, SO FAR’, would
be even more influential…
The author seems to be hung up on the “nothing is real and everything is a distraction from reality” thing. That kind of gets counterproductive imo. I think Whitney Webb put it best about the Epstein files and what they mean, and thus why you should care. But I won’t elaborate, the author and his cult appear to have made their minds up and believe they have a handle on what is important.
So we shouldn’t be healthily skeptical, in a post Covid world, of things the establishment serve up? We should take some of them at face value? How do we select which? A2
There’s a difference between what’s being served up and how it’s served up. Certainly, how it’s served up is suspicious and we should be skeptical. But to play off the Epstein files as a nothing burger is wrong imo. Like I said, Whitney Webb has done a great job tying it all together with the elite class responsible for everything. It’s all part and parcel with our number one problem, those that control us and how they do it. I think the oligarchy news coverage is distractive of course, but the issue is real. The author and his minions appear to be saying that the Epstein files are a hoax and the story behind them is a distraction from more important things. I don’t agree. I guess that makes me unworthy.
The state will not release any blackmail data, it will covet, hoard and use it.
Additionally if Epstien is some sort of honey-pot clandestine agent, do you think he would keep sensitive info on his standard e-mail? I don’t.
So what are you saying? It’s all fake? That’s bullshit. Things happened, rich people did it. The same ones that fuck with us on a daily basis.
No not what I said. Sorry I ment to write more. You just arent going to get any substantial data from a US data dump, just crumbs.
I do think its possible that much of what we think we know about these people is fake. There are enough victims that have come out, my default is the sex crimes are true.
No problem. Well, I suppose it’s like the scamdemic, or wars, or whatever. There’s a lot of information out there, including the truth. It’s up to each of us personally to find whatever truth we want, or not. I’ve read quite a bit about this, it is undoubtedly true and it ties in with the global world order, right up to the Rothschilds and the z ionist grip on humanity. People are naive to dismiss this case just because it’s being obfuscated to hell by the oligarchy media. They did the same thing with the scamdemic.
You’re absolutely right.
They just have this habit of calling everything a hoax. And I don’t blame them, because an awful lot of things are hoaxes. But this one ain’t. The only hoax is that they suggest that we are getting all of the information. And we aren’t hardly getting a bit of it. The truth behind it is so much more horrible, it is beyond what any of us can imagine.
“Sam”.. (or maybe Kit?) … a referee’s job is neutrality, administration, not point of view. But since you “pend” and sometimes delete posts, inserting your well known bias into thread discussions is the reason many hesitate to comment here knowing that a preordained, editorial bias overlord haunts OG.
If people read our comments regularly and still think we’re biased then nothing I do will change their pov I’m certain lol.
And thanks for your advice, I feel I am keeping things neutral. Academic/Scientific Skepticism is a well accepted approach in order help eliminate bias.
A2
No you are not. If you are admin, you have absolutely no right to express your opinion. If you want to be a commenter, retire and stop pending others and become a civilian commoner or author like the rest of us. Stay in your lane outside this forum. You have corrupted objectivity into a distasteful subjectivity. Just like ICE, GET OUT!!!
Provide evidence of your accusations that I have “corrupted objectivity into a distasteful subjectivity” or stop with the mudslinging 🙄
Also surely the more subjective POV in this instance would be taking the “Epstein Files” at face value, which was actually what I was advocating against??!! So i don’t think your point here even makes any sense! 😅
Frankly I don’t think this is a very good comment from you, Sandy. A2
Evidence? Every word you write here that is not about site technicalities, and pertains to your viewpoints about the articles and challenges to commenters, is PROOF of you subjectively intruding on discussions that are none of your business. This is a negation of objectivity in managing a forum where only the public and authors are involved. As I have said to you before, if I were involved in managing OG I would insist you either refrain from any opinion whatsoever or resign. I think you are a hopelessly clueless individual and a terrible moderator/tech.
So no actual examples then, just your sweeping and dogmatic opinions of how forums should be run. Gotcha.
Sandy, you’re entitled to your views of course and you’re entitled to run your own forum any way you like, but this is not how offg has ever been operated and, despite all your censorious certainty, not many comment forums like this are actually run how you describe either.
Regardless, for the record, Admin can converse and invite a more moderate viewpoint in the comments if admin feels things are becoming unbalanced or if the point of an article is being missed. This allows for maximum freedom of expression in the comments without the need to censor outlying views the way most comment forums do. This is entirely at admin’s discretion. If you find it too disagreeable then by all means take your comments to a site you rate better.
If you care to cite examples of better comment forums then by all means link them below!
You know you’re making admin intervene more by bringing Offg’s integrity into question in this baseless manner. Isn’t that kinda ironic? What will new readers think, reading this? How much damage do you think you’re causing to offg, undermining trust like this? Do you care? Do your 1131 comments mean that little to you? How will existing commenters feel having their output here undermined in this fashion?
Frankly I think you should credit your fellow commenters with a bit more integrity. They aren’t children and they aren’t so easily swayed by the odd interjection from admin. On the whole I think they realise the important job admin does in order to grant as much freedom as possible in this comment section.
I certainly don’t see anyone chiming in to back you up rn anyway.
Thanks for your feedback and I hope you have a lovely day, Sandy, and please try not to take it all so seriously. Peace 😃 A2
Proof from the horse’s mouth:
“Provide evidence of your accusations that I have “corrupted objectivity into a distasteful subjectivity” or stop with the mudslinging
“Also surely the more subjective POV in this instance would be taking the “Epstein Files” at face value, which was actually what I was advocating against??!! So i don’t think your point here even makes any sense!
“Frankly I don’t think this is a very good comment from you, Sandy. A2”
Oh I see, so Admin can’t respond to your accusations without proving your point.
Ever heard of a circular argument before?
A2
The author seems to be hung up on the “nothing is real and everything is a distraction from reality” thing.
The authors never mentioned Epstein when it was hot topic.
Stick around and your see this is Offguardians modus operandi.
That is why the author is called on other comment boards after the fact Kit.
Moral disintegrity underlies dysfunctional disorder arising from forced or coercive imposture.
Moral accusations operate the leverage of guilt as control within shifting narratives.
The Moral order is effectively usurped by the imposture of fake moral authority – derived from hating or attacking and denying ‘evils’ that are thus accorded creative agency – for identity is gained or boosted from them.
The acting out of fantasy on the body as a means to gain or boost a sense of function is where the tale wags the dog, for the mind becomes tools by its own symbolic association to get a ‘hit’ of life within a mindset of rulebound denials of life.
The dictates of ‘order’ compel the mind but the mind that usurps the heart claims moral authority.
These reflections are not a means to leverage the world, but address the leverage given the mind by a ‘heart’ given to fear. Without the support and protection of the heart – the gaslighting mind could not run the fantasy of control.
It takes two to tango. Releasing the compulsive fascination of horror and the addictive identity of conflict as the dynamic of control, allows the truly creative to move as our own awareness – the simple moment of being.
How does ‘the creative’ solve my problems?
Look carefully at how you cocreate your problems.
I didn’t engage with the article much because it hits on the same old winge
I’m not at all immune to disillusion – but I also see that to be truly dis-illusioned must be free to know truly. Not to shift from one dream or nightmare to another.
But vested self-illusion has been the basis of a learned identity. A masking over of a sense of need-lack as fear, pain and loss. I find resistance to unmasking as a ‘mind’ of self justificating obfuscation.
So what is there but to notice the difference between such a ‘mind’ and a true movement of being – as the basis of an ‘informed consent’ in place of a frame of coercion.
To take a step away from truth is to set a basis for another.
Yet to notice truth is the grace by which to step anew – from a true or honest appreciation – and leave a false basis for acting out, unused.
The denial of God / Infinity runs as the basis for an ‘exclusive’ focus of partiality.
There is a way of yielding a partiality to the Infinite that is not death – but may feel like the approach of death. Systemic or structured death runs in the name of life – with all the life we give it – but in ways that are kept hidden. Not by ‘Them’ but by the mindset of a self set apart; masked, distanced and defended by preset judgements and pre-emptive attack.
‘A hug that is not performative, that’s what Infinity is made of’ … (anon) …
Accusing others of immorality is always easier than attempting to be moral oneself
Lily Allen – The Fear
Accusing our ‘sins’ in others is the tempt. Integrity is not a tempt but a willingness to accept rather than make truth.
Wanting reality to be different (than it is) sets up ‘choice-conflicts’ as vested or conflictive ‘identities’. A split mind must try to maintain a disequilibrium as an imposed ‘order’ over masked and protected conflicts.
That we see an established or learned habit as easier, hides the driven struggles that shapes a seemingly self evident ‘world’.
We likewise ‘use’ a screen based computing tool as IF a simple operation, but the complexity that runs back-end is no longer understandable by a single mind but results from a collective alignment of value and purpose that runs as a simple key or touch input system.
How easy is accepting what is?
Or how invested are we in self-illusions that ‘possess us’ while we think to use than, blind —or powerless to being used?
The appreciation of wholeness or integrality is lost to the conflict framed as moral struggle and thus morally mitigated or boosted identity relative to evils cast out to others, world, life or God.
Substitutes for love or power in life run hollow and need sacrifice to keep ‘topped up’. Are they ‘lies’ or are they the result of fallacies given acceptance as true? And thus defended as our self, and such defences set as order over perceived risk or threat of evils that compound the human conditioning?
What something is – or is asserted to be – is part of what it is being used for, the purpose in mind it is serving. Fools rush in… The honey trap works the mark – but so does the offering of targets to dump or offload hate.
Responsibility in truth is not framed by blame and sacrifice.
What is truth – a discernment within the living?
Or judgements set (as if) over and apart from life?
We may notice a split mind, and thus open a basis for choosing life – instead of shaping truth as a ruled and filtered mind of judgements that then define the mind that sets them.
Sure sounds and looks manufactured. Computer music for the masses.
Jeffrey’s advice to his ‘friends’
“Dont put it in writing, ’cause it might later come back and bite you
on the arse !”
So what’s with all the photos and “documents?”
If you were running a ‘recreational’ island for high profile clients, would cameras be allowed ?
And posing for photos ?
if the idea was to blackmail powerful people into implementing agenda 2030 and the digital prisons, then yes, of course.
Or designed to look that way? The article is inviting us to question things like this. A2
Yes. Of course. That’s the whole idea. Cameras are installed everywhere and the “clients” are well aware of them. They are video’ed fucking little girls and sometimes killing them. Then the videos are used to blackmail them into giving the country’s money and armaments to their masters.
Impunity.
Trump “Can We get away with it ?”
Obama “Yes We can !”
“But that it should also so totally dominate the alternate media I find a little concerning.”
Did you mean to say “alternative media”
Well spotted Marty ! Good to know someone around here is awake !
How many other kommas did you ‘awoke’ smart guys spotted?
The Epstein Files Transparency Act was a bipartisan bill passed by Congress in November 2025. By law, the DOJ had to release the files.
OT: Epstein’s cellmate:
The cellmate, a former policeman, gets released the day before Epstein is found dead with a broken neck in his cell. Epstein as having been previously recorded as saying the guy wished to dispose of him.
Cameras conveniently not working on the day, nor any subsequently. Lazy (or paid) security guards accounting for any subsequent hours.
What else to do deduce other than the cellmate broke Epstein’s neck and then was allowed to go walkies as some kinda plea bargain? One’s actual Nemesis never being too far away.
The cameras are there to catch potential terrorists who jeopardize America and our Constitution.
Not to catch hedge fund managers who got caught with their big hands in the candy shop.
Thats why the cameras didnt work that day and night, and not some conspiracy theories..
The question I keep coming back to is: Why should we even care?
We already know by now that all the head honchos of the world doing the bidding of the oligarchical controllers behind the scenes have been or still are engaged in disgusting and/or criminal activities which is why they are beholden to the controllers, and why every change we are seeing now is for the benefit of the few and to the detriment of the many.
Veritas indeed.
We do nothing, we’re toast.
We revolt, in the numbers awake, we’re toast.
50+ years of dumbing down in the programming system we call education has ensured our slavery.
Problem is, most of us LOVE it.
So convenient !
You wanna take somebody down ? Allege the person ‘sexually abused
children’. Folks will then automatically believe everything else you allege
about the perp…
No, I dont wanna take somebody down.
Yes. That’s the point. Or you can hold the allegation over their heads, like Damocles’ sword, to keep them doing what you want them to. Which is mostly giving all the money to you.
What is not being mentioned is the close knit circle of deviants/ paedophiles and satanists who are pushing the various Neo serfdom agendas which all tie in with the City of London/ Wall street bankers !
“..It’s now well-established that Epstein was close with the Rothschilds—recall that Dershowitz casually revealed that he was first introduced to Epstein by Lynn Forester de Rothschild in the ‘90s:
Interestingly, Lynn Forester de Rothschild herself was introduced to her husband Sir Evelyn de Rothschild by Henry Kissinger at the 1998 Bilderberg Group conference, as per her own Wiki—just another glimpse into how deeply connected this elite beau monde really is.
Epstein was also close with the Rockefellers, having been appointed to the board of directors of the Rockefeller Foundation by David Rockefeller himself, which Epstein recounts on video. Recall that David and Jacob were close colleagues, as well,…
In fact, Epstein’s famous Upper Eastside mansion in Manhattan was allegedly purchased for him by the Rockefellers, according to Whitney Webb’s research. Ghislaine Maxwell herself purchased her NYC estate from none other than…Lynn Forester de Rothschild:
A document from the file dump shows that Epstein had a close business relationship with the Rothschilds, receiving $25,000,000 for services rendered to them, apparently for risk analysis and ‘algorithm-related services’ in resolving matters between the Rothschilds and US authorities:..
Truth be told, it’s far more likely that Epstein was not a Mossad asset but rather a direct Rothschild asset being used to gain leverage over everyone including the Mossad; why else would he need to compromise Israeli politicians like Ehud Barak along with the “goyim”, as he popularly termed them?
And of course, there’s now the notorious exchange with Peter Thiel, wherein Epstein openly admits who it is he represents:..”
Damage Control: Epstein a Russian Spy According to New Corporate Press Spin Cycle
S
Nice point. Quite possible. On the other hand, sometimes “Mossad” is just a sort of shorthand for the truth.
Who funded and paid for Israel to come into being ? The old adage of who pays the piper calls the tune comes to mind !
There are lessons to be learned from the negative dilemma generated by the Situationists. They were so accurately critical of a Spectacle engulfing the consciousness of humanity. But while being correct, they had no firm ground for what reality does exist that is obscured by the Spectacle of representations that needs to be reborn. What I am saying is that when critical theory rejects everything as invalid, there has to be a valid state that is an ideal to return to. Too much at OG, and elsewhere, is so universally cynical that everything that appears before us is rejected as conscious fraud of some form or another.
I think the elite no longer care about hiding their own corrupt souls. Epstein carries evidence of almost every contemporary elite evil that is victimizing of the world’s 99% on a daily basis. Short of cannibalism(?). Since they can no longer hide it, it’s in our daily life experience, “why not flaunt it” and see how we react? It’s a dare, and we should grab a hold of it as a mirror in their evil Vampire faces until they are removed from authority.
Saying the Epstein documentation is just a witch hunt diversion would be the ultimate in irony that protects elites from appropriate karma. This class of inhumans are Vampires that should never be allowed to have anything to do with humanity.
Focusing on the more salacious bits of information detracts from the core message. What you have here is power brokerage on an epic scale. The fact that individual recreational tastes can be catered for is just part of the service, like great food and fine wines.
I’m sure that if I were someone of potential importance then I’d have received an informal invite to this holiday idyll where my tastes and proclivities would be gently probed. Like many I’d probably take one look at the place, figure it out and on returning home politely decline further invitations. I can’t blow the whistle because there won’t be anything concrete to mention and, anyway, I’d need many of these contacts for business or political reasons. So being ‘mentioned in papers’ once or twice is likely to be a measure of probity — I’ve experienced temptation and walked away from it.
Fair point. I suppose we all visit those richer than ourselves. Enjoy their food, their compliments, their buttering up. And walk away without criticisms. After all, why should we bite the hand that feeds us.
In which case, who’s to criticize those who do it on a grander scale?
Should not alt-media celebrate when evilly misguided ‘elites’ finally get their comeuppance?
Such as Gates exposed for his STDs after promoting Covid vaccines.
A cause for a party. Perhaps not. To not rejoice in the downfall of the wicked of course being a more noble (and more Biblical) reaction.
Yet twisted morals on all sides it would seem. Mandelson being married to a bloke not raising an eyebrow, whereas a foot massage from a young lady does. Lot would have offered up his daughters instead of such behaviour.
Maybe this was some sort of revenge by Epstein on Gates.
Such a good point. And of course applies more broadly. Example – the ‘Migrant’ debate, which focuses (in the UK) solely on the illegal contingent…while wholly ignoring *legal* migration – rates for which are at least 10 times higher.
A point which I think is largely missed by those with (legit) concerns over cultural integrity etc.
You follow a African religion called Christianity, Your
fakeJesus was born in the middle east = AFRICA.creator your own fairy tale.
Actually the Middle East isn’t Africa. If in doubt, check a map
Oh, the small matter of geography and distance does’nt count when trying to smear or distort.
smear or distort.
Did Brook’s Brothers mens tailors have a branch in the Middle East ( it’s not in Africa by the way) around 2 Millenia ago ?
After then fall of the ottoman empire after world war one
The league of nations created the term middle east and new names was given to certain territory, PRE this it was apart of africa,
The main point being your fake religion called Christianity is not western
and the west was a better place for it.
A ‘territory’ is indeed a piece of earth, land, geography. Essentially transcending any names ascribed to it.
Christianity as not Western and yet it should be Western? You may need to clarify that point, at least…
You have no main point. Christianity is universal for the entire globe.
For everybody. For Jews, for Africans, for Arabs, for Commies, for you name it.
Therefore you belittling of Christianity by referring to Africa as its root as a special shithole is pathetic. Deeply pathetic.
Africa was once part of a super continent but it isn’t referred to as Pangaea in recent times.
1. I’m not Christian.
2. Unwittingly, you’re an advert for not losing one’s religion. Well done.
I’m not a Christian either.
However, I can envision how she by taking a dump on Christianlty – using all her different multiple IDs – through these comment pages day in and day out has probably converted and recruited more people to its cause than any Bible Thumper or missionary has ever achieved.
pending
strange how many mention this when they reply to you.
2. Unwittingly, you’re an advert for not losing one’s religion. Well done.
I am an example of a free thinker unlike you needing fairtales to deal with your daddy issues.
The plan to replace the UN with Davos – knowing how secretive and controlling the Davos elite are – it could very well have been true.
Izabella Kaminska (@izakaminska): “In case you missed this one: WEF’s Borge Brende (one of the top people at WEF) was plotting with Epstein about replacing the UN with Davos ! https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01022907.pdf” | nitter.poast.org
The pedophiles, child rapists and satanist flesh eaters will never be exposed let alone brought to justice. The whole thing is a contrived obfuscation of the highest order made to detract and deceive. It should be treated like the over flowing crock of shit that it is…
Slightly contradictory since the whole point of the files is that pedophiles are being exposed
Not the teal ones
Nice point. On the other hand, it is true that the worst pedophiles, and their worst acts, including murder, are being withheld.
You just trying to protect your cult leader there Scoobis? Nothing to see here, right?
Grow up Al
You grow up dude. You’re the one spreading nonsense every fucking time you post. I’m just busting your balls, you deserve it.
It’s nonsense to you because you are to ignorant and deranged to see any view but your own skewed bulllshit. Fuck off and get a life!
Says a fucking Trump supporter, i.e., and the republican party, and the zionist and technocratic billionaires that control him? Shit, you have no fucking credibility MFer.
I think you are on to something. Say who totally and utterly controls Trump and the republican party again. I think it bears repeating.
That’s the thing. We all know these fuckers, i.e., presidents, are basically installed, controlled and told what to do and it’s the same with Trump. So those supporting Trump are in effect supporting not just the republican party, but the whole ball of wax controlling it. Most don’t think of that, like this Scoobis dude. I’ve been trying to “remind” people of that for awhile now, not just here. At least try to make them think a little.
Think a little? Take your own advice. I know I am a critical thinker. Yet you place me in a box because I support Trump’s attempt in bettering America. I truly don’t give a flying fuck what you think!
No, you’re not just supporting Trump, and glad to see you admit it. You’re supporting all those that control him as well as the republican party itself. You in the Maga cult don’t like to think about that. Then again, evidently you want that. I don’t support any of the oligarchy or either corrupt political parties and haven’t for a couple decades. You are basically on their side when you do that, and against freedom and liberty.
These are the same global elites who after bringing about the deaths of a half-a-million Iraqi children – shed light on their moral compass through one of their mouthpieces, then Sec. of State Madeline Albright, when she explained on live television that “we” think bringing about the death of those half-a-million children is – quote – “worth it.” Yet we are somehow surprised these sterling examples of humanity might abuse children? Abuse or kill one child and you are a perverted monster – starve and kill a half-a-million and you’re just one more Western policy wonk – you know – making those – “hard decisions.” Go figure.
And the same decision-makers who coerced people to take the poison needle, with around 17 million deaths and untold millions more now permanently damaged or disabled or currently dying from cancer.
My biggest question about this is, why were these files released? It seems obvious that nobody in the US government especially Trump, Kash Patel, and well the rest of the entire establishment, wanted this “disclosure” to take place. They’ve been telling us that the Jeffrey Epstein affair is a “hoax” for months.
And yet, they were just dumped on the DOJ website out of nowhere. And apparently the POTUS has no authority to remove them. And nobody is even asking the question: Why? Who did this?
Democracy. The public desire to see and hear everything smashed on the frontpage right into their little private homes. Hanging the guy in public. Its an old issue.
From Judas Iskariot to the ropes in the Wild Wild West to the global MSM.
.
Not even a Roman Governor Pontius Pilate nor an American President Dictator Trump can do a shit against the wish of the People!
I’m fairly sure democracy did NOT leak the files to the DOJ website…
Have you tried to be a President or a Governor and withstand the enormous pressure from the majority of ‘We the People’:
“hang him , hang him, hang him, hang him” shouted the crowd, and you did the right thing?? No you have not!
Thin Lizzy – The Hero And The Madman – https://youtu.be/cYtoslM5AkY .
Well unfortunately Erik, “the people” are fucking morons….
That was my point being as polite as I possible could. But some people smelled the coffee 😋 .
Are the president or any of his key allies explicitly implicated in any actual crimes in these documents? What about his political enemies? And what’s going on that these documents may pay as a valuable distraction from right now?
Does it have something to do with Trump’s reluctance to pull the trigger on Iran, perhaps? Or perhaps Trump is supposed to get impeached after losing the midterms, so that Palantir-favorite JD Vance can assume command and role out the police state. Or … who knows!
Well, to be fair, they were ‘released’, rather than being ‘dumped’ or ‘leaked’ out of nowhere.
Trump does come over as relatively unscathed, as he does in Virginia Giuffre’s memoir, so perhaps that’s part of the reason that they can be released.
All true but it’s worse
The regime/elites have already passed peak nefariousness(?) and are sitting comfortably.
One more skeleton in the closet adds nothing against them.
It is as likely this story will be spun into a “calls for digital ID” as justice being served.