No, Mandelson is NOT “The Biggest Scandal of the Century”
Kit Knightly
Keir Starmer’s appointment of Peter Mandelson as Ambassador to the United States, despite his known links to Jeffrey Epstein, is the “biggest political scandal of the century”.
According to Nigel Farage, anyway.
Sky News at least has the sense to phrase it as a question…
Could Peter Mandelson be the biggest political scandal of the century?
To which the obvious, facetious answer is “Which one?”
And the more honest answer is “No, obviously not.”
I don’t care if Lord Mandelson was passing sensitive information, I don’t care if Sir Keir knew or not and I don’t care who the unfortunate woman having to stand next to Peter Mandelson in his underpants is. The answer is no.
The suggestion itself, in a world where Blair and Covid and Jimmy Saville and David Kelly exist, is actually insulting to anyone with any intelligence and the notion of truth itself.
The very fact the question is even being posed proves the answer is no. The really important scandals aren’t called “important scandals” on the front page of every newspaper in the country; they get called “misinformation”. If they get talked about at all.
Let’s end this quick-take with a question of our own.
What would you say is the “biggest political scandal of the century”?
Please pick one of the following:
- Multiple Western governments and the entire mainstream press, lying about “weapons of mass destruction” to start a war for profit that killed a million people.
- All the governments and institutions of the world colluding to falsify a pandemic in order institute and abuse emergency powers and sell unnecessary and untested vaccines.
- A picture of Peter Mandelson in his underpants.
PS. I had to Google “Peter Mandelson underpants” today, and I will never forgive the world for putting me in this position.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Jeffie was merely maintaining the tribe’s tradition.
https://terratimes.substack.com/p/every-time
I always wonder what is buried unter the current pile of crap. The higher the pile the bigger the corpse underneath. Covid, Ukraine war – no SMO, Gaza, now Epstein. It’sgetting hectic in the past five years.
so so right. and Palestine!
Palestine. Would that be the same ‘philistia’ as in the KJV. Land of [eternal] Philistines?
It is for today. come tommorrow they will forget and it will be what ever the same people who give them news is the same people who tell you what to repeat.
Many Nigel fans boy on the site.
Lordy in his pants contradickts last week grok showing whoever in there knickers and
laws must be brought into stop this happening.
The murder of David Kelly by agents of the UK government in order to keep the WMD thing on track is a far greater scandal.
As is any one of a vast number of other things. Iraq. Libya. Covid. Take your pick.
Ancient history in social media terms but yes. David Kelly was likely disposed of under the proverbial tree. Or at least driven psychologically to his end. Iran likely the latest in the WMD hype
I’m so bored with all the Epstein noise. So, a bunch of rich and powerful and otherwise influential men were caught or nearly caught up in a blackmail sting involving attractive young women. Quelle surprise. Grubby, but completely on par with how such men behave when they think they can get away with it.
What I want to know, and what is never even mentioned, let alone discussed, is who was pulling Epstein’s strings. Who was running him, in spycraft parlance. And what actions were taken by said rich and powerful and otherwise influential men as a consequence; at who’s behest, and to who’s benefit — that is, with what effect?
Reveal that, and perhaps “Epstein” is a noise worth making.
And while we’re at it, who has replaced Epstein in this age-old game of capture the titan?
Maybe his own warped philosophy ran him?
After all didn’t he fund anyone who promoted ‘evolutionary’ thinking in fund-desparate Unis.
In my considered opinion, there is absolutely no way that he could have embroiled all of the influential men that he did, all on his own (Ghislaine Maxwell’s help notwithstanding). Where did the initial investment come from to get this vast scheme underway and keep it going until it was paying for itself?
No, this was not the work of just one man (and his twisted henchwoman).
Exactly. Especially since none of the under-age girl (and boy?) abusers will loose their high-end positions, let alone be imprisoned. I mean, even Trump said to the reporter who wanted to know how he thought the victims were coping after the fat old men were done with them (though she didn’t actually get to finish her sentence) that the world should just move on, and that the reporter never smiles enough. We know these things and much, much worse go on, and that the perps never land in prison.
sick fuck ED, it was under age girls aka children.
Epstein went to prison for raping a children.
The Epstein story is so seeded… He got caught in Florida when he could have easily went into international waters or an island or even a neighboring state with a lower age of consent….
The emails are so telegraphed too… An intelligence guy that can run a ring doesn’t know that email is insecure? Hahaha bullshit…
And the jail death makes no sense and the video was purposely set up to look doctored. Any one of us with simple editing skills could have done it way better.
The big scandals are those that are hardly talked about …
https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/the-coded-journals-in-the-epstein-files-that-hide-a-teenage-girls-horrific-story/
One and Two far exceed Three – usually when the media pushes a narrative like say Mandelson – there’s something more sinister going on in the background – that they don’t want the limelight shone on.
No, it’s nothing. And obviously wag the dog stuff. Most Americans, including me, don’t even know who he is or what he did, and could not care less. Wasn’t he handing out stock tips, or was that somebody else? It’s nice to have evidence of what everybody already knew, that government officials receive some of their bribes through insider trading. Wall Street isn’t fixed or anything.