63

6 Masterpieces of Contemporary American Cinema: Neoliberalism through the Looking Glass

David Penner

As transpired in Weimar Germany, cataclysmic times invariably induce great suffering, yet they can also serve as inspiration for poignant and moving works of art.

What follows is a discussion of six works of insightful and intellectually nuanced contemporary American cinema which explore this distressing age in all its viciousness and depravity, while engaging the anguish of the individual struggling to survive amidst a maelstrom of unprecedented corporate pillage and political and socio-economic chaos.

While I have tried to limit them as much as possible, these reviews may contain spoilers.

1. The East

Directed by Zal Batmanglij; starring Brit Marling, Alexander Skarsgård, and Elliot Page (2013)

The East tells the gripping story of Jane, a young woman (played by Brit Marling) who is employed at a private intelligence company, and who is awarded the sought-after assignment of infiltrating a radical environmental organization called The East. Like many Americans who have “good jobs,” Jane is zealously devoted to her career and devoid of a moral compass. Her unbridled ambition is on full display when Jane is told by her boyfriend that she’s still a winner to him if she doesn’t get this coveted commission (the details of which are unbeknownst to him), to which she responds, “I’m only a winner if I get it.”

When Jane infiltrates the group, which she is able to do because of her youth and because of certain strategies she employs to gain the group’s trust, she realizes that she is unable to intellectually counter any of their arguments regarding ecological degradation caused by unfettered corporate power. Indeed, Jane is a conformist, and like many highly credentialed Americans has never learned to think for herself. This raises the possibility of her potentially becoming a double agent.

The environmentalists are exquisitely cast, and the leaders of the group possess remarkable depth. They are also well educated, having come from privileged families and having attended elite schools. Their dilemma is that they have managed to retain firm moral convictions making them unemployable.

In a more democratic and civilized society the leaders of The East would likely hold positions of power and influence. Instead, they live as outcasts. The time Jane spends with the radical collective forces her to reexamine her preconceived understanding of success. Is true success possible without principles and ideals?

The two worlds Jane navigates, the ruthless corporate world of violence and skulduggery and an America enraged at corporate malfeasance, shake the foundation of her identity and sense of reality. The East’s methods for combatting corporate villainy – actions they call “jams” – are extreme and of dubious legality, further straining the protagonist’s sense of right and wrong. What happens to the rule of law when what is legal and what is moral no longer coincide? 

Having never spent time around articulate people who value honor over money (in stark contrast with her pitiless boss and hard-driving colleagues), the time Jane spends with the collective catapults her into an existential crisis where her value system is upended and she is forced to make extremely difficult and life-altering choices.

2. Wendy and Lucy

Directed by Kelly Reichardt; starring Michelle Williams (2008)

No film in the post-New Deal era embodies the tragic destruction of the American working class more than Wendy and Lucy. In this harsh world millions have been left without jobs, health insurance; or in the case of the film’s protagonist, Wendy, even a family member to crash with. 

Caught up in a tempest of economic devastation, Wendy is left with nothing except a few hundred dollars, a jalopy which serves both as makeshift home and means of transportation, and her beloved dog Lucy – her only companion.

The grave circumstances of her situation are tragic and soulful cinema viewers will all feel a deep sense of compassion for her increasingly dire situation. As she passes through flyover country the lack of communities and economic life almost resemble that of a post-apocalyptic tale. Deindustrialization, the outsourcing and offshoring of countless jobs, and the financialization of the economy have cut millions of Americans adrift, of whom our suffering protagonist is one.

Wendy and Lucy is the antithesis of mass market Hollywood cinema where everyone seems to magically have friends and money. Wendy’s brother-in-law and an elderly security guard she meets feel pity for her plight, yet they are also “strapped” and are in no meaningful position to assist her.

How many trillions of dollars have been spent on wars, cannibalistic proxies, and on maintaining hundreds of bases around the world while destitute Americans drown in a sea of oligarchic avarice?

Having heard that there is work there, Wendy is headed to Alaska. Yet when her car breaks down and events threaten to separate her from Lucy her poverty, loneliness, and despair become almost unbearable. Instead of job opportunities, friends, and family she is enveloped by a shroud of silence.

3. Margin Call

Directed by JC Chandor; starring Kevin Spacey, Jeremy Irons, Demi Moore and Zachary Quinto (2011)

Perhaps the best movie ever made about Wall Street, Margin Call tells the story of the financial crash of 2008. The story, which unfolds over a 24-hour period, revolves around a powerful Wall Street investment bank, and one of the key motifs of the film is not only how these demonic corporations treat their fellow Americans, but how they treat their own workers.

When an entry-level analyst is covertly handed a flash drive by his recently fired boss, he discovers that the firm is in danger of going bankrupt due to having invested too heavily in unstable mortgage-backed securities whose value is rapidly deteriorating.  He alerts his superiors and senior management calls an emergency meeting in the dead of night. The firm’s CEO (brought to life in an unforgettable performance by Jeremy Irons), whose helicopter makes a dramatic landing on the roof of their skyscraper, reminds everyone that his motto is, “Be first, be smarter, or cheat.” Only concerned with self-preservation, he is prepared to do virtually anything to prevent the firm from going under, and this rabid tribalism supersedes loyalty to one’s country and even to the financial services industry itself whose fellow vultures they are preparing to swindle.

The firm is infested with sociopaths like New York City garbage is crawling with cockroaches. At one point a young analyst is found crying in the bathroom after being notified that he will shortly be let go, and one of the senior managers indifferently takes note of his distress while simultaneously shaving with a cold-blooded hauteur and likely pondering ways to unload “The biggest bag of odorous excrement ever assembled in the history of capitalism” (to quote their CEO). Here, apart from one’s ability to generate significant profits, human life has no value. There are only “winners” and “losers,” and the “winners” are the ones that continue to make the big bucks.

No less disturbing are instances where employees are not allowed to quit, such as one Kafkaesque situation where the firm sends its people scouring the bars of lower Manhattan to try and find the recently laid off and now distraught head of risk management, who they learn has important insights into how they ended up in this disastrous situation in the first place, yet who was cruelly fired after nineteen years of devoted service with even his phone being shut off. Despite his wife informing the firm that her husband doesn’t want to speak to them, he is eventually located and forced to return to work when threats are made to revoke his severance package.

There is a scene where one of the senior managers played by Kevin Spacey comes out of his office applauding after a huge number of the firm’s employees were just laid off. Participating in this death cult ritual, his obsequious subordinates mimic his behavior. Speaking of those recently sacked, he says, “They were good at their jobs. You were better.”

Spacey’s character is later treated in a similar fashion when he returns to his former home to bury his dog (whom he evidently cares for far more than the small business owners undoubtedly run into the ground by his firm), only to be told by his ex-wife that, “You don’t live here anymore,” and that, “The alarm is on so don’t try to break in.” In a mirroring of how he has long treated his employees, his wife has replaced him with another husband.

Margin Call vividly portrays a diseased America that is at war with the world and at war with itself.

4. Martha Marcy May Marlene

Directed by Sean Durkin; starring Elizabeth Olsen, Sarah Paulson, and John Hawkes (2011)

Dying societies invariably become a field of lost souls, and no soul is more lost than the protagonist of Martha Marcy May Marlene, a profound examination into how a disintegrating society can facilitate the rise of cults that prey on, ensnare, and entrap vulnerable human beings. The lead character, Martha, is renamed Marcy May by the cult leader (who is reminiscent of Charles Manson), while Marlene is the name female cult members use when answering the phone and following a script designed to attract new followers.

In a neoliberal America where people increasingly no longer identify themselves as Americans but by their profession, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation, Martha no longer has any idea who she is, thereby offering easy prey to the cult. All the ties that may have once bound her to an American history or a personal history have been severed, making her as impressionable as a small child.

Part of the cult’s seductive nature is how it makes use of a vaguely anti-capitalist language. However, its raison d’être is ultimately to annihilate all vestiges of privacy and individuality, resulting in a violent and authoritarian existence for the cult’s members who are taught to share their clothes, their beds; and ultimately, their bodies. The protagonist has many names, and yet no name. For her lack of a cultural value system has dissolved her sense of self.

Initiation into the cult is done by drugging a young woman so that she can be raped by the cult leader, yet the protagonist is told that this is actually a good thing, revealing a Tartarean world where ethics are amorphous and reality is something that can be invented. (To quote Hamlet: “There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”)

Martha represents millions of young Americans who grow up without a loving family, a real community, and are denied a proper humanities education. Indeed, she is a shell of a human being, a cultural amnesiac devoid of reason, a sense of the past, and a sense of the sacred.

The only place Martha can seek refuge is with her sister and brother-in-law, shallow people concerned only with money and accumulating possessions. Their crass consumerism and indifference to serious socio-economic problems is cultlike in and of itself, offering Martha no clear way to escape from this existential crisis she finds herself in. 

The harrowing tale unfolds in a disjointed and fragmented manner, which mirrors the fragmented psyche of the suffering protagonist – and in many ways, of American society itself.

5. The Girlfriend Experience

Directed by Steven Soderbergh; starring Sasha Grey, Chris Santos, and Philip Eytan (2009)

Steven Soderbergh’s thought-provoking film The Girlfriend Experience (not to be confused with the mini-series) takes us on a journey through another dark circle of this second Gilded Age, where sexual relations have been rendered largely transactional and thereby stripped of tenderness and romance.

Chelsea (Sasha Grey), the film’s protagonist, works as a high-end prostitute for an affluent Manhattan clientele, while her boyfriend is employed as an honest athletic trainer earning a small fraction of what she makes – an all too common paradox, yet one which also serves as a metaphor for how incomes are typically doled out in 21st century America.

In this nihilistic culture that places profit-making over all other considerations, the protagonist has come to believe that one’s sex partner is no different than one’s tennis partner, and that her life as a prostitute for jet-setters will lead to freedom and liberation. 

Chelsea worships wealth and will do anything to be with those who have it. In a country where the masses are saddled with trillions of dollars of household debt while a small group of plutocrats enjoy unbridled power, there is virtually no moral barrier she won’t violate in order to spend time with the mega rich, even if it means becoming their plaything and forgoing all traces of dignity.

The film raises disturbing questions about the nature of a hyper-privatized America and its impact on social relations. If a society ceases to hold anything sacred, is it still a real society? Is it possible to retain one’s humanity when one regards people as mere commodities to be used and then discarded? Due to its adoration of materialism and emotionless sexual encounters, is contemporary Western feminism compatible with love?

Chelsea’s hapless and no less delusional boyfriend initially approves of her degenerate lifestyle, and only insists that she doesn’t go on any trips with her “clients,” which, during one heated quarrel, she condemns as “selfish.” Like his wayward would-be lover, he has been taught by the media and education system that his girlfriend can work as a prostitute and that this somehow won’t inevitably destroy their relationship.

The Girlfriend Experience depicts a dystopia where people are incessantly using one another for material gain and real communities have been eradicated under a deathly hand of relentless exploitation, job destruction, and hyper-consumerism which for many Americans have swept away all traces of trust and love.

6. Michael Clayton

Directed by Tony Gilroy; starring Tom Wilkinson, Tilda Swinton, and George Clooney (2007)

There is a riveting scene in Michael Clayton that unfolds in a lower Manhattan neighborhood I know all too well, where Arthur Edens (in a role masterfully executed by Tom Wilkinson), one of his law firm’s lead litigators, is berating Michael Clayton (George Clooney) for continuing to blindly follow their firm’s orders, to which a defensive Clayton says, “I’m not the enemy.” To which Arthur replies, “Then who are you?”

Michael Clayton is a story about a society drowning in corporate savagery and two men who are consciously or subconsciously trying to reclaim their humanity.

Arthur represents U-North, an agricultural corporation that has polluted the environment with a carcinogenic weed killer. The problem – at least for his law firm and the corporation they are defending – is that Arthur knows that he has squandered years of his life defending diabolical corporations and, wracked with guilt, has decided that he is tired of fighting on the side of these dastardly forces. To the amazement of his colleagues, one day he suddenly snaps and goes rogue, turning on U-North, which his law firm has been hired to defend in a multibillion dollar class action lawsuit. While initially exasperated, Michael can’t help but be influenced by his friend’s strange behavior, and his amoral ethos is challenged. 

Of great significance are the unhappy private lives of Michael, Arthur (who lives alone in an enormous dimly lit Soho loft), and the loyal corporate soldier Karen Crowder (performed chillingly by Tilda Swinton), all of whom make significant six figure salaries yet live lonely lives devoid of meaning and a sense of purpose.

Michael Clayton underscores the catch-22 that many Americans find themselves in, where those who are able to break out of the ignominious cycle of debt slavery and modern serfdom often do so by selling their souls and relinquishing all semblance of morality and freedom of speech, while many of those who have “made it” don’t have time to think about anything other than their extremely demanding jobs which devour every waking moment. Leaving this information bubble by exploring alternative news sources in an attempt to search for answers to these troubling times can lead to thinking, thinking can lead to posting heretical thoughts, which in turn can only lead to being ostracized from elite circles, unemployment, and death – professional, or even literal. And so it pays not to think.

In one haunting scene Clayton is driving in a rural area in upstate New York when he suddenly exits his car to approach three mysterious and strikingly beautiful horses. Like the inversion of the three witches in Macbeth, the animals seem to be calling on him to abandon a life of ambition and to return to a simpler and more humane existence devoid of materialism, dissembling, and relentless competition.

The mysticism and primordial timelessness of this moment mesmerize the mind of a man who has lost his way in a brutal world, and serve as a clarion call to reclaim a life that is more dignified and honorable before it is too late.

SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN

If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8000


63 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dayne
Dayne
Mar 26, 2025 3:13 AM

Well… All of these movies are corporate products from Hollywood studios. Making the right noises while perpetuating the system.

Vagabard
Vagabard
Mar 24, 2025 11:00 PM

Number 4 should be compulsory viewing for any alt-media aficionados imho [Martha Marcy May Marlene (2011)]…

… how to escape from cult-thinking. Timeless advice…

Mario J.
Mario J.
Mar 24, 2025 9:25 PM

I don’t watch almost anything from the TV. Mostly there is just a crap. I do have it. But there are some other good things to run on the backgrkund.

shva
shva
Mar 24, 2025 12:30 PM

Never heard of the films TBH.
I got a new list to watch now.
Thank you.

shva
shva
Mar 25, 2025 8:56 AM
Reply to  shva

Update  MARTHA MARCY MAY MARLENE was good.

rik myers
rik myers
Mar 24, 2025 5:23 AM

wtf a movie with zionist assistance of Syria’s destruction partner of the Whtie Helmets George Clooney you can do better than that

mgeo
mgeo
Mar 24, 2025 5:17 AM

Mass murderers have fine art too. Support your local mass murderer.

les online
les online
Mar 24, 2025 3:18 AM

So are we There yet, are we about to Make the Family Great Again (MFGA) ?
(Cant let all those Values remain Homeless ?)

I_left_the_left
I_left_the_left
Mar 24, 2025 1:42 AM

Would David Penner ever class an uplifting film as ‘a masterpiece’?

Howard
Howard
Mar 24, 2025 8:44 PM

Uplifting films in a world drowning in madness are as likely to be propaganda as art.

Marb
Marb
Mar 24, 2025 12:18 AM

Along the same Lines , bleak as F..k…
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104348/
Great Reviews .. thanks!

Marb
Marb
Mar 24, 2025 12:19 AM
Reply to  Marb

Glengarry Glen Ross- 1992

Sandra Locke
Sandra Locke
Mar 23, 2025 10:45 PM

I’m sorry, but the publicity for the film says that Sasha Grey is a pornography actress. What is that called where a movie criticizes and promulgates something at the same time? The theme of the movie seems to be that prostitution is bad. But giving a prostitute the opportunity to be a movie star seems to suggest that prostitution is good.

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 24, 2025 1:39 AM
Reply to  Sandra Locke

Doesn’t she deserve a chance?

AS
AS
Mar 24, 2025 1:41 AM
Reply to  Sandra Locke

It’s been many yrs since I saw the film so my memory of it isn’t strong, but I’m fairly certain – given what I do remember & my knowledge of Soderbergh’s other works – the film was less a criticism of prostitution and more one of the modern American economy and the dehumanizing aspects of America’s hustling culture (which the writer describes well). So I don’t detect any hypocrisy there (in any event, the film endorses neither prostitution nor pornography).

Furthermore, Grey was a porn performer, as you note, not a prostitute (both forms of sex work but there are key differences). She was known for her interest in acting outside of porn, of film as an art form, and I believe was a fan of Soderbergh’s films, so her involvement was more nuanced than you perhaps realize.

Sandra Locke
Sandra Locke
Mar 24, 2025 5:15 AM
Reply to  AS

No, I’m not sure, but I think you are just wrong.

Stephen John
Stephen John
Mar 23, 2025 9:22 PM

The one film I suggest to rudderless people is “The Outlaw Josey Wales”. Since 1945, let’s say since Hiroshima, we in the West have been driven to selfishness and self-service, neatly disguised as both evolutionary and “good” (per Gordon Gecko). The only way forward is a conscious choosing of community where our individual desires are, by choice, made secondary to what the greater good of our chosen group is. That is exactly the arc of Eastwood’s movie. (One can throw in “Mr Holland’s Opus”, “Sullivan’s Travels”, “The Legend of Bagger Vance”, “What Dreams May Come” and, the procreator of them all, “Scrooge” (1951 b&w Alastair Sim version.) As Joseph Campbell said, “The mark of a Hero is a preparedness to sacrifice anything, even one’s life” – if called, would we step forward against amorality gone mad on behalf of the greater good?

sandy
sandy
Mar 23, 2025 7:17 PM

Thanks for this list of films in this postmodern age devoid of critique. Almost all of the true art and film critics and critique, that used to exist in almost every large urban area newspaper, has been jettisoned with the rest of journalism, by and large. Except NYT and the LAT to my knowledge. Postmodernism, a virus of the post everything world, demands absolute equality of all arguments, a paralyzing throttling of thought and decision. It would be good to hear more art criticism and ideas that bring cultural works into view as revolutionary action.

Aloysius
Aloysius
Mar 23, 2025 6:56 PM

I saw a show recently called “Sprung,” set in the early days of Covid. It’s pretty funny and brings back absurd memories of those rollicking time that I had forgot.

rossgopicotrain
rossgopicotrain
Mar 23, 2025 5:02 PM

go to, ‘theflixertv.to’, and you’ll gain access to all of the movies listed above

Rob
Rob
Mar 23, 2025 1:37 PM

Some good shows that were great in helping me understand humanity.
BATTLESTAR GALACTICA and the prequel series CAPRICA
THE LEFTOVERS
MR ROBOT
WESTWORLD

Bored now
Bored now
Mar 23, 2025 1:17 PM

I must confess, I lazily assume there are no decent new films anymore, in the same way many people assume there are no decent new bands anymore. Thank you for enlightening me.
PS There are lots of great new bands too. The trick is finding them.

sandy
sandy
Mar 23, 2025 7:38 PM
Reply to  Bored now

The best place to hear contemporary music, not played on the musak FM dial, is college radio. Most major colleges and universities, and some JCs, have student run radio with mostly music between the sports broadcasts. They are almost all available online so anyone can tune in to your local college or U. You will hear every form and movement within the music environment. This can be good if you are a musician but very annoying if you are not, and just like certain types of music. But if one is patient and like to hear what’s new, and even local live, this is the ONLY place you will hear it. Sometimes i just have to turn it off. Like from 2pm to 4pm nearly everyday when the DJs like to play the unbearable Screamers or Hard Stuff. But you will hear hip hop, trip hop and jazz, world, folk, rock, country, rave, house, downbeat, electronic experimentation, you name it. Ya just have t’be a little patient to hear the stuff you will really like. But soooo worth it. In Eugene, we have KWVA at UO. In the Bay Area KALX at UCB and KZSU Stanford. And if you really wanna hear new wack stuff, KFJC in Los Altos Hills plays probably the most radically experimental stuff imaginable. Some totally unbearable. But great fun.

Howard
Howard
Mar 24, 2025 8:52 PM
Reply to  sandy

Hope college radio can withstand the Trump onslaught against American Universities. If indeed they play really good music, they may run afoul of the new arbiter of morality. Mr. Two Thousand Pound Bombs are moral; Two Thousand Words can become immoral, seditious and terroristic at the drop of a presidential whim.

Dayne
Dayne
Mar 26, 2025 3:27 AM
Reply to  Bored now

I ignore just about everything that’s been made post 2000. Not that entertainment hasn’t always been a direct extension of the military-industrial-psychiatric-intelligence complex, of course. But the last 25 years have inverted and trampled on all that is of any value, with no subtlety or nuance whatsoever. I know that young people nowadays are desperate for approval and will endorse whatever One True Agenda someone in authority rams down their throats. We Gen Xers were raised differently, taught differently, and are still wired differently.

Simon D
Simon D
Mar 23, 2025 12:37 PM

Apropos Margin Call, the Kevin Spacey character’s climactic burial of his dog is a metaphor: a dud stock is known in the money trade as a ‘dog’. Also of note is the fact that the firm in the movie is based on Lehman Brothers – yet the CEO is cast as a WASP, played by the ever-pliant Jeremy Irons, go-to baddy for demonising the Englishman.

IMO Stanley Tucci walks away with that film and leaves the rest of the cast in the dust.

judith
judith
Mar 24, 2025 10:29 AM
Reply to  Simon D

Tucci has a tendency to do that. Wonderful actor.

Hornbach
Hornbach
Mar 23, 2025 12:00 PM

Just checked : none of these titles are on Netflix.

rossgopicotrain
rossgopicotrain
Mar 23, 2025 5:02 PM
Reply to  Hornbach

go to, ‘theflixertv.to’, and you’ll gain access to some – if not most – of said movies.

Grafter
Grafter
Mar 24, 2025 9:31 AM
Reply to  Hornbach

NETFLIX.  😂  😂  😂  😂  😂 

Jonathan
Jonathan
Mar 23, 2025 11:21 AM

Very persuasive. I will check some of those out. How sad that (some) movies more accurately reflect these times than documentaries do.

No less disturbing are instances where employees are not allowed to quit

There’s always a way. While I was working for a big financial institution in a glassy Norman Foster tower with hugely space-wasting atrium, one guy lept over the balcony from a high floor. This was while the big crash was brewing and we were all being treated like crap for reasons being hidden from us. I left in a less spectacular fashion shortly before the crash and the company being bailed out by the US government (I mean taxpayers.)

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 23, 2025 11:13 AM
ChairmanDrusha
ChairmanDrusha
Mar 23, 2025 3:03 PM
Reply to  Johnny

How brave of him. To pop up out of years of irrelevance.

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 23, 2025 9:40 PM
Reply to  ChairmanDrusha

Tell that to his millions of readers.

Jenner
Jenner
Mar 24, 2025 2:27 AM
Reply to  Johnny

Hedges is a fine writer. But he is a 9/11 Truth denier, that is, he never deals with it. Like Chomsky and other leftists he also refuses to address the murders of JFK, ,RFK, MLK. .He has said nothing about the Scamdemic 2020-2025. For him. false flags seem not to exist. Rockefeller or Rothschild are not in his line of vision..

He adheres to Holocaustianity by using it as a benchmark. This is why he never unpacks the concept of antisemitism. So he adopts by default the Lachrymose Narrative of Jewish history, in which Jews have never done anything at all these last two millennia (such as predatory lending or alcohol distribution licenses in Poland or tax farming, ditto) to make anybody dislike their presence.

This will be because Hedges moves in radical circles in which Jewish leftists as opposed to neocon Zionists are prominent and have been for ca. 100 years, since the heavy influx from E Europe before 1900.

John Mearsheimer or Grant F Smith can tell you how the Jewish lobby in the USA works, Hedges doesn’t.

He is de facto anti-white,using often the phrase “white supremacy”. This may be due to his particular brand of Christianity.

His recent speech (es) seem to include LGBT as allies: when will Hedges start including pedophiles as well, AKA “minor-attracted persons, MAPs, practising “intergenerational romance”?

The genuine leftist Jennifer Bilek gives the lie to Hedge’s cheap LGBT posturing on the road to what he publicly wants for the USA,, “socialism” (his word): note that the T means transgender:

https://jbilek.substack.com/p/the-gender-industry-deconstructing?publication_id=1093941&post_id=157663531&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxNjE0ODA0MCwicG9zdF9pZCI6MTU3NjYzNTMxLCJpYXQiOjE3NDAyMDE0MzksImV4cCI6MTc0Mjc5MzQzOSwiaXNzIjoicHViLTEwOTM5NDEiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.EHKkuCbfHAVOL0DtJFuEGtIZQAOnVcuYO0YkVeAB_9c&r=9m3wo&triedRedirect=true

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Mar 24, 2025 2:46 AM
Reply to  Jenner

So he adopts by default the Lachrymose Narrative of Jewish history, in which Jews have never done anything at all these last two millennia

So where is it declared that any of the Jews you’re referring to here were acting on behalf of all Jews, and not their immediate masters? On whose authority do we ascribe the actions of the very few to the Will of the many?

Perhaps you think Jews have no masters, nor ever had over the past 2 millennia, and they are answerable (collectively, apparently) only for themselves?

Based on your own logic, who do you think gains more traction from expressing these opinions in this way, you or the IHRA?

By all means go ahead and cast Jews as your enemy, that’s your prerogative, but maybe try not to enable your enemy quite so much? A2

Jenner
Jenner
Mar 24, 2025 3:37 AM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Now why did I reckon with Samuel popping up? He is truly in the Caitlin Johnstone school of obfuscation.

That is, there is only antisemitism, no semitism, that is, no consistent set of behaviours, which trigger the “anti”.
And led to ejection of Jews from countries 109 times since AD 0, apparently, not that I counted.

Tell me Samuel, how to explain antisemitism, are you going to drop Adorno or Marcuse or other Frankfurt Schoolers on me, saying grosso modo that white Europeans are mentally ill, due also to them being Christian? And that this, along with their fascist authoritarianism, explains their antisemitism? Listen to Benjamin Friedman’s famous speech instead ,

Your 2nd and 3 paras, as usual, are obscure, but anyway: A short answer is public opinion polls in Israel in 2025 showing unanimous support of ethnic cleansing. So the Many, are foursquare behind the very Few, to use your words. The Few being the Israeli ruling class, the Masters.

Going back say to E Europe 1500-1900 we see what Prof Macdonald calls a group evolutionary strategy at work: hostile sharp business practice and nepotism to advance the ingroup at the expense of the host outgroup. So in 1914 in Hungary Jews were but 5% but already 50% of all lawyers, doctors, journos.

1500-1900 we had obedience by Jews to and cooperation with local aristocrats in their class war against the then predominant peasantry in various countries.

Fast forward to now, when the Sackler family of Purdue Chemical in the USA were fined a huge sum for the Oxycontin/Endone scandal but did indeed endow a wing of the Tel Aviv Med school.

So for alcoholised Polish peasants, victims of Jewish publicans, losing their land to pay their debts in 1870, read: white US working class Oxycontin deaths in the hundreds of thousands around 1996.

Your ostensible concern that I fall foul of the IHRA would be touching if genuine. Instead of worrying about me, show me where you have taken any action against the IHRA?

Btw, as an anti-white, Hedges cannot afford to offend the many Jewish leftist radicals who also want socialism in the USA. As they advocate open borders and multiculti, I assume they intend to achieve that using a multiracial alliance, which would be a novum in world history.

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Mar 24, 2025 10:30 AM
Reply to  Jenner

Frankly, Jenner, how dare you accuse me of obfuscation when you serve word salads like this. 😅

Also, attempting to weaponise my name is childish and prejudiced, and your comparison to Johnson is just ad hom. Anymore of that won’t get through. I asked a civil and straightforward question, why not do me the curtesy, if your intentions are honourable, of behaving honourably?

While I ponder and unpick your reply, please note you missed the point of my question entirely, which was: whose cause do you better serve by expressing your views in this way, yours or the IHRA’s?

hostile sharp business practice and nepotism to advance the ingroup at the expense of the host outgroup. So in 1914 in Hungary Jews were but 5% but already 50% of all lawyers, doctors, journos.

Your current strategy of essentially disseminating 1930s-style anti-Jewish propaganda has some rather obvious flaws in today’s world, I think. I’m just concerned that if Jews really are these complete Machiavellian units as you say, maybe we need to think a bit… smarter?

Plus it all just seems a little bit primitive, you know? If you don’t mind me saying? Spreading hate and distrust is something oppressors do, so let’s stop doing this ourselves, maybe? Can’t we hope to aim for something a bit more, idk, spiritually enlightened?

Or at least aim somewhere with a greater chance of success? Who likes wasting effort? I certainly don’t. A2

Tom Larsen
Tom Larsen
Mar 24, 2025 5:18 PM
Reply to  Jenner

It is interesting that those that laud Hannah Arendt’s “Origins of Totalitarianism” – like Hedges – seem to omit the first part of the book on the history of anti-semitism,where Arendt notes (essentially) that all Jews get blamed for the real and documented actions of rich Jews (who serve the gentile ruling classes).

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 24, 2025 4:42 AM
Reply to  Jenner

No point in throwing out the ‘baby’ with the bloodwater.

sandy
sandy
Mar 23, 2025 5:33 PM
Reply to  Johnny

I lost any respect for Hedges, the eternal downer in content and affectation, when he threw Occupy under the bus for being too “violent”. A level of hypocrisy impossible to match.

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 24, 2025 3:53 AM
Reply to  sandy

How’s it go again?
Oh yeah;
“Let those without ‘sin’ cast the first stone”

And no, l am not a Christian.
And Hedges is not a Saint.

judith
judith
Mar 23, 2025 10:45 AM

I would not call them masterpieces but I have seen Michael Clayton and Margin Call.

Great movies with excellent casts. Jeremy Irons in Margin Call is a sight to behold. And I’ll watch anything with Stanley Tucci. (first season of Fortitude, fabulous)

I have not seen the other films, but highly recommend Clayton and Margin Call.

red lester
red lester
Mar 23, 2025 10:44 AM

It’s been downhill since Caddyshack

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 24, 2025 12:51 AM
Reply to  red lester

You can’t have had the unfortunate experience of seeing ‘Deadly Weapons’ then:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadly_Weapons

I saw it at a drive in theatre more than fifty years ago.
I’m still in shock.

Howard
Howard
Mar 24, 2025 9:06 PM
Reply to  Johnny

About 60 years ago, I saw “The Balcony” at the drive in (film was based on a Jean Genet play). It had a scene which has been cut from the DVD version, a very riveting scene.

I also saw a movie called “I Spit On Your Grave” – a French, dubbed English, movie with Christian Marquand – which I cannot find anywhere even in reference let alone the movie itself. There is a movie called “I Spit On Your Grave” but it isn’t the Christian Marquand film. It was one film that blew me away. But it’s like it never existed. My experience with finding that film (at 81 now) belies the phrase “All comes to he who waits.”

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 24, 2025 10:00 PM
Reply to  Howard

Found this Howard:

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 24, 2025 10:08 PM
Reply to  Johnny
milosevic
milosevic
Mar 25, 2025 6:42 AM
Reply to  Howard

here’s the IMDB reference:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052937/

Roger
Roger
Mar 23, 2025 9:46 AM
Reply to  Roger

https://wp.me/pahPgT-76z

IF YOU ARE STILL PAYING ATTENTION YOU ARE NOT PAYING ATTENTION #IABATO

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 23, 2025 10:52 AM
Reply to  Roger

Both dead ends (404) Roger.

The Real Edwige
The Real Edwige
Mar 23, 2025 9:24 AM

Criticising neoliberalism does not make a film oppositional nor a masterpiece. Neoliberalism is not some permanent elite ideology – it was a weapon they used 1975-2000 to concentrate wealth but it’s not the long term plan which requires much more “hands-on” control.

Did these films (collaborative efforts requiring millions of dollars) somehow slip through the net? Did their makers (notice the complete absence of analysis of the film’s studios or producers btw) not notice they’d greenlighted films that were sticking it to “the man”? How can the writer mention George Clooney or Kevin Spacey and not appear to be aware of their revealed true natures?

Hollywood (probably always, certainly in recent decades) is utterly toxic and has to be sen as the social engineering psyop it is.

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 23, 2025 10:54 AM

But should we blame the actors or the writers and producers?

underground poet
underground poet
Mar 23, 2025 11:02 AM
Reply to  Johnny

Its just the times we are in, the end times in particular, where the knowledge was disclosed in the past, but we had to live in the future, and were lucky to be even be here.

sandy
sandy
Mar 23, 2025 7:00 PM

Hollywood, the entertainment face of the elites, the actor class like politicians, like to manifest simulations, representations, of their financial and social violence upon society so that society, the other, will be enabled to revel in seeing “someone” within the abhorrent system of alienation identify it’s true evil nature. By placing a true mirror of their evil selves to the public, it neutralizes the likelihood of commoner rebellion. Representations in this culture, replace reality. So instead of having a real rebellion on their watch, people are sucked into thinking there are some elites, like Hollywood films represent, that are “speaking truth to power”, so we can just sit back and wait for the good ones to overthrow the bad ones. Not!

This is THE problem within contemporary society. These films, made by truly honorable artists trying to enlighten viewers to the true nature of contemporary capitalist managed societies, are allowed through by capitalist management as perceptual kryptonite against commoner rebellion. These representations help perpetuate a constant state of depression, alienation and self policing. Waiting for the solution that never comes. We are hopium drip-drugged by their fictional dramas, while their docudramas meticulously manicure out hard truths from real happenings that might epiphany viewers into consciousness. Many, like many here at OG, are seeing through the elite’s veils of illusion and becoming immune to their Spectacle.

As a verification of the above, just note how many films and books portray a eutopian society (the good place) where the dysfunctions of the existing system have been, or are being actively, solved. Other than the doubling down on a “good” capitalist hopium family approach.

I went searching once to see how many artists and art forms depicted eutopia. [Not “Utopia” which is a pitiful, sarcastic, FAKE rendition of a condition that capitalists mock as pie-in-the-sky naivete.] There are but a few books, a couple of films, and a few visual artists that portray a non-sarcastic eutopia. But dystopian views are legion. They plague sci-fi and every art form short of music, which seems immune (non-language, non-pictorial?). I myself as an artist find myself battling against the evil by portraying it as clearly as possible. I find that portraying a possible eutopianism, that cannot be seen as dopey optimism, is made difficult to impossible because of the programmed, default, capitalist social expectation of few winners and many losers, “that’s just how things are” bullshit. Humor seems to cut through best so far.

Just imagine a humorous film depicting the dystopian future of a Great Reset world, which is currently being portrayed and sold to us as Utopian. 🙂

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 24, 2025 4:35 AM
Reply to  sandy

Dead Poets Society?

Captain Birdheart
Captain Birdheart
Mar 23, 2025 7:18 PM

That’s what ‘we’, common sense and ‘they’ have been saying.
Latest figures around 10% don’t belief mainstream, says msm.

!0% of US have figured it out !

34 Million Americans Have Figured Out the Earth is Flat

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 24, 2025 2:30 AM

340 million non ‘americans’ have figured out USians are fat.

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 23, 2025 8:59 AM

Where’s the USian Ken Loach?
A filmmaker with principles.

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 23, 2025 8:50 AM

First read this on Dissident Voice.
David, like Ed Curtin, is a perceptive individual and a good writer.
All of his work is worth reading.

Pity about the dearth of quality films with a message.

Pilgrim Shadow
Pilgrim Shadow
Mar 23, 2025 3:18 PM
Reply to  Johnny

Pity about the dearth of quality films without a message.

Johnny
Johnny
Mar 24, 2025 2:31 AM
Reply to  Pilgrim Shadow

That to.