Language, Mind Control, and 9/11
Edward Curtin
“An example that shows the radical devaluation of thought is the transformation of words in propaganda; there, language, the instrument of the mind, become ‘pure sound,’ a symbol directly evoking feelings and reflexes.”
Jacques Ellul, Propaganda
“A leader or an interest that can make itself master of current symbols is the master of the current situation.”
Walter Lippman, Public Opinion
Tuesday, September 11, 2001, was a non-teaching day for me. I was home in Massachusetts when the phone rang at 9 A.M. It was my daughter who lived and worked in New York City and was on a week’s vacation with her future husband. “Turn on the TV,” she said. “Why?” I asked. “Haven’t you heard? A plane hit the World Trade Tower.”
I turned the TV on and watched a plane crash into the Tower. I said, “They just showed a replay.” She quickly corrected me, “No, that’s another plane.” And we talked as we watched in horror, learning that it was the South Tower this time.
Sitting next to my daughter was my future son-in-law; he had not had a day off from work in a year. He had finally taken a week’s vacation so they could go to Cape Cod. He worked on the 100th floor of the South Tower. By chance, he had escaped the death that claimed 176 of his co-workers. My father’s good friend, retired from a NYC job and living in Pennsylvania, had a one-day-a-month consultancy job at the Twin Tower. Tuesday the 11th was his day to die in the North Tower.
That was my introduction to the attacks. Twenty-four years have disappeared behind us, yet it seems like yesterday. And yet again, it seems like long, long ago. But long ago is today when the repercussions of what happened then “lie” behind today’s terrible events, as they do because Bush, Jr.’s Global War on Terror continues on its mad and doleful way under three more presidents and different linguistic mind control narratives.
As I type these words, I look down on my desk at my grandfather’s gold badge: Deputy Chief of the New York City Fire Department. Two of his brothers, my great-uncles, were members of the Fire Department and another a NYC cop, a sister a public school teacher. My other grandfather, my cousins, niece and her husband were NYC Police Officers. My grandfather’s nightstick hangs on a nail in another room. A great-great grandfather owned a popular tavern in the West 40s and another a livery stable on the West Side.
Having grown up in the Bronx, gone to high school and graduate school in Manhattan, I have long and deep family roots in NYC. My Irish immigrant ancestors were sandhogs who dug the tunnels for the subways, the tunnels bringing water down to the city, and the foundations for the skyscrapers.
This history goes deep and high, for my niece was a detective and her husband an anti-terrorism detective who flew over the Twin Towers in a helicopter on that fateful morning, taking so many of the famous photographs of the devastation below.
I tell you this to emphasize how the city, where my family goes back 175 years, is in my blood, and the news my daughter conveyed to me affected me deeply. No matter where you roam in later life, as many native New Yorkers will attest, such bonds tie you back to what we call The City, and when its foundations are shaken as they were on September 11, 2001, so are you at a very deep level.
Thus the truth of how and why these tragic events happened on a glorious September morning became my quest. It began emotionally but soon turned logical and objective as I followed my academic training in the sociology of knowledge and propaganda.
Over the next few days, as the government and the media accused Osama bin Laden and 19 Arabs of being responsible for the attacks, I told a friend that what I was hearing wasn’t believable; the official story as reported by the media was full of holes.
It was a reaction that I couldn’t fully explain, but it set me on a search for the truth. I proceeded in fits and starts, but by the fall of 2004, with the help of the extraordinary work of David Ray Griffin and other early skeptics, I could articulate the reasons for my initial intuition. My specialty throughout my long university teaching career has been propaganda, so I set about creating and teaching a college course on what had come to be called 9/11, on what I had learned.
But I no longer refer to the events of that day by those numbers – 9/11.
Let me explain why.
By 2004 I was convinced that the US government’s claims (and The 9/11 Commission Report) were fictitious.
After meticulous study and research, they seemed so blatantly false that I concluded the attacks were an intelligence operation led by the neoconservatives – Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, et al. – who had become central elements within the George W. Bush administration and whose purpose was to initiate a national state of emergency (that is still in effect in 2025) to justify wars of aggression, known euphemistically as “the war on terror.”
The sophistication of the attacks, and the lack of any proffered real evidence except hyperbolic empty accusations for the government’s claims, suggested that a great deal of planning had been involved and a coverup was underway.
Yet I was chagrined and amazed by so many people’s insouciant lack of interest in researching arguably the most important world event since the assassination of President Kennedy. I understood the various psychological dimensions of this denial, the fear, cognitive dissonance, etc., but I sensed something else as well. For so many people their minds seemed to have been “made up” from the start. I found that many young people were the exceptions, while most of their elders dared not question the official narrative. This included many prominent leftist critics of American foreign policy. Now that twenty-four years have elapsed, this seems truer than ever.
So with the promptings of people like Graeme MacQueen, Lance de Haven-Smith, T.H. Meyer, Jacques Ellul, et al., I have concluded that a process of linguistic mind-control was in place before, during, and after the attacks. As with all good propaganda, the language had to be insinuated over time and introduced through intermediaries. It had to seem “natural” and to flow out of events, not to precede them. And it had to be repeated over and over again. All of this was carried out by the corporate mainstream media.
In summary form, I will list the language I believe “made up the minds” of those who have refused to examine the government’s claims about the September 11th attacks and the subsequent anthrax attacks.
1. Pearl Harbor
As pointed out by David Ray Griffin and others, this term was used in September 2000 in The Project for the New American Century’s report, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” (p.51). Its neo-con authors argued that the U.S. wouldn’t be able to attack Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia, and Sudan, etc. “absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”
Coincidentally or not, the film Pearl Harbor, made with Pentagon assistance and a massive budget, was released on May 25, 2001 and was a box office hit. It was in the theaters throughout the summer. The thought of the attack on Pearl Harbor (not a surprise to the U.S. government, but presented as such) was in the air despite the fact that the 60th anniversary of that attack was not until December 7, 2001, a more likely release date.
Once the September 11th attacks occurred, the Pearl Harbor comparison was “plucked out” of the social atmosphere and used innumerable times, beginning immediately. Even George W. Bush was reported to have had the time to allegedly use it in his diary that night. The examples of this comparison are manifold, but I am summarizing, so I will skip giving them. Any casual researcher can confirm this.
2. Homeland
This strange un-American term, another WW II word associated with another enemy – Nazi Germany – was also used (in a Freudian Slip faux pas) many times by the neo-con authors of “Rebuilding America’s Defenses.” I doubt any average American referred to this country by that term before.
Of course it became the moniker for The Department of Homeland Security, marrying home with security to form a comforting name that simultaneously and unconsciously suggests a defense against Hitler-like evil coming from the outside. Not coincidentally, Hitler introduced it into the Nazi propaganda vernacular at the 1934 Nuremberg rally. Both usages conjured up images of a home besieged by alien forces intent on its destruction; thus preemptive action was in order.
3. Ground Zero
This is a third WWII (“the good war”) term first used at 11:55 A.M. on September 11th by Mark Walsh (aka “the Harley Guy” because he was wearing a Harley-Davidson tee shirt) in an interview on the street by a Fox News reporter, Rick Leventhal. Identified as a Fox free-lancer, Walsh also explained the Twin Towers collapse in a precise, well-rehearsed manner that would be the same illogical explanation later given by the government: “mostly due to structural failure because the fire was too intense.”
Ground zero – a nuclear bomb term first used by U.S. scientists to refer to the spot where they exploded the first nuclear bomb in New Mexico in 1945 – became another meme adopted by the media that suggested a nuclear attack had occurred or might in the future if the U.S. didn’t act.
The nuclear scare was raised again and again by George W. Bush and U.S. officials in the days and months following the attacks, although nuclear weapons were beside the point. But the conjoining of “nuclear” with “ground zero” served to raise the fear factor dramatically. Ironically, the project to develop the nuclear bomb was called the Manhattan Project and was headquartered at 270 Broadway, NYC, a few short blocks north of the World Trade Center.
4. The Unthinkable
This is another nuclear term whose usage as linguistic mind control and propaganda is analyzed by Graeme MacQueen in the penultimate chapter of The 2001 Anthrax Deception. He notes the patterned use of this term before and after September 11th, while saying “the pattern may not signify a grand plan …. It deserves investigation and contemplation.” He then presents a convincing case that the use of this term couldn’t be accidental. He notes how George W. Bush, in a major foreign policy speech on May 1, 2001, “gave informal public notice that the United States intended to withdraw unilaterally from the ABM Treaty”; Bush said the U.S. must be willing to “rethink the unthinkable.” This was necessary because of terrorism and rogue states with “weapons of mass destruction.” PNAC also argued that the U.S. should withdraw from the treaty. A signatory to the treaty could only withdraw after giving six months’ notice and because of “extraordinary events” that “jeopardized its supreme interests.” Once the September 11th attacks occurred, Bush rethought the unthinkable and officially gave formal notice on December 13th to withdraw the U.S. from the ABM Treaty. MacQueen specifies the many times different media used the term “unthinkable” in October 2001 in reference to the anthrax attacks. He explicates its usage in one of the anthrax letters – “The Unthinkabel” [sic]. He explains how the media that used the term so often were at the time unaware of its usage in the anthrax letter since that letter’s content had not yet been revealed, and how the letter writer had mailed the letter before the media started using the word. He makes a rock solid case showing the U.S. government’s complicity in the anthrax attacks and therefore in those of 11 September While calling the use of the term “unthinkable” in all its iterations “problematic,” he writes, “The truth is that the employment of ‘the unthinkable’ in this letter, when weight is given both to the meaning of this term in U.S. strategic circles and to the other relevant uses of the term in 2001, points us in the direction of the U.S. military and intelligence communities.” I am reminded of Orwell’s point in 1984: “a heretical thought – that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc – should be literally unthinkable, at least as far as thought is dependent on words.” Thus the government and media’s use of “unthinkable” becomes a classic case of “doublethink.” The unthinkable is unthinkable.
5. 9/11
This is the key usage that has reverberated down the years around which the others revolve. It is an anomalous numerical designation with no precedent applied to an historical event, and obviously also the emergency telephone number. Try to think of another numerical appellation for an important event in American history. The future editor of The New York Times and Iraq war promoter, Bill Keller, introduced this connection the following morning in a NY Times op-ed piece, “America’s Emergency Line: 9/11.”
The linkage of the attacks to a permanent national emergency was thus subliminally introduced, as Keller mentioned Israel nine times and seven times compared the U.S. situation to that of Israel as a target for terrorists. His first sentence reads: “An Israeli response to America’s aptly dated wake-up call might well be, ‘Now you know.’” By referring to September 11th as 9/11, an endless national emergency became wedded to an endless war on “terror” aimed at preventing Hitler-like terrorists from obliterating us with nuclear weapons that could create another ground zero or holocaust. It is a term that pushes all the right buttons evoking unending social fear and anxiety.
It is language as sorcery; it is propaganda at its best. Even those who dissent from the official narrative continue to use the term that has become a fixture of public consciousness through endless repetition.
As George W. Bush would later put it as he connected Saddam Hussein to “9/11” and pushed for the Iraq war, “We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.”
All the ingredients for a linguistic mind-control smoothie had been blended.
*
I have concluded – and this is impossible to prove definitively at this time because of the nature of such propagandistic techniques and documents that take many decades to be discovered and perhaps released – that the use of all these words/numbers is part of a highly sophisticated linguistic mind-control campaign waged to create a narrative that has lodged in the minds of hundreds of millions of people and is very hard to dislodge. It is why I don’t speak of “9/11” any more. I refer to those events as the attacks of September 11, 2001. But I am not sure how to undo the damage.
Lance de Haven-Smith puts it well in Conspiracy Theory in America:
The rapidity with which the new language of the war on terror appeared and took hold; the synergy between terms and their mutual connections to WW II nomenclatures; and above all the connections between many terms and the emergency motif of “9/11” and “9-1-1” – any one of these factors alone, but certainly all of them together – raise the possibility that work on this linguistic construct began long before 9/11….It turns out that elite political crime, even treason, may actually be official policy.
Needless to say, his use of the words “possibility” and “may” are in order when one sticks to strict empiricism. However, when one reads his full text, it is apparent to me that he considers these “coincidences” part of a government conspiracy. I have also reached that conclusion. As Thoreau put in his underappreciated humorous way, “Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.”
The evidence for linguistic mind control, while the subject of this essay, does not stand alone, of course. It underpins the actual attacks of September 11 and the subsequent anthrax attacks that are linked. The official explanations for these events by themselves do not stand up to elementary logic and are patently false, as proven by thousands of well-respected professional researchers from all walks of life – i.e. engineers, pilots, architects, and scholars from many disciplines. To paraphrase the prescient Philadelphia lawyer Vince Salandria, who said it long ago concerning the assassination of President Kennedy, the attacks of 2001 are “a false mystery concealing state crimes.”
If one objectively studies the 2001 attacks together with the language adopted to explain and preserve them in social memory, the “mystery” emerges from the realm of the unthinkable and becomes unutterable. “There is no mystery.” How to communicate this when the corporate mainstream media serve the function of the government’s mockingbird (as in Operation Mockingbird) repeating and repeating the same narrative in the same language; that is the difficult task we are faced with.
The anthrax attacks that followed those of 9/11 have disappeared from public memory in ways analogous to the pulverization of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7. For the towers, at least, ghostly afterimages persist, albeit fading like last night’s nightmare. But the anthrax attacks, clearly linked to 9/11 and the Patriot Act, are like lost letters, sent, but long forgotten. Such disappearing acts are a staple of American life these days. Memory has come upon hard times in amnesiac nation.
With The 2001 Anthrax Deception, Graeme MacQueen, founding Director of the Center for Peace Studies at McMaster University, calls us back to a careful reconsideration of the anthrax attacks. It is an eloquent and pellucid lesson in inductive reasoning and deserves to stand with David Ray Griffin’s brilliant multi-volume dissection of the truth of that tragic September 11 day and its consequences. MacQueen makes a powerful case for the linkage of both events, a tie that binds both to insider elements deep within the U.S. government, perhaps in coordination with foreign elements. His book should be required reading.
MacQueen’s thesis is as follows: The criminal anthrax attacks were conducted by a group of conspirators deep within the U.S. government who are linked to, or identical with, the 9/11 perpetrators. Their purpose was to redefine the Cold War into the Global War on Terror and in doing so weaken civil liberties in the United States and attack other nations.
Words have a power to enchant and mesmerize. Linguistic mind-control – language as sorcery – especially when linked to traumatic events such as the September 11th and anthrax attacks, can strike people dumb and blind. It often makes some subjects “unthinkable” and “unspeakable” (to quote James W. Douglass quoting the Trappist monk Thomas Merton in JFK and the Unspeakable: the unspeakable “is the void that contradicts everything that is spoken even before the words are said; the void that gets into the language of public and official declarations at the very moment when they are pronounced, and makes them ring dead with the hollowness of the abyss. It is the void out of which Eichmann drew the punctilious exactitude of his obedience…”).
We need a new vocabulary to speak of these terrible things.
Edward Curtin: Sociologist, researcher, poet, essayist, journalist, novelist….writer – beyond a cage of categories. His new book is AT THE LOST AND FOUND: Personal & Political Dispatches of Resistance and Hope (Clarity Press)
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Im getting the feeling OG is not what it seems. Maybe its here acting for the deep state to get our details? I have raised a point that is obviously causing OG a problem, as I know it’s a fact that could cause serious issues regarding state fraud, but I’ve been pending for over 12 hours. Funny that.
I don’t know, but I think this column pays for a claque.
Claqueurs? How could you ever come on this idea. Unbelievable.
OWNER OF WORLD TRADE CENTER SAID WHAT? Comment by Gareth Icke.
All quite right. But I don’t know how sophisticated it was. You just hire some English majors to come up with some likely words, send out the talking points memo and voila, conspiracy.
I appreciate anyone calling to look within or beneath appearances rather than compulsively react to false evidences appearing real.
Most use mind control to mean control by others.
There is a saying – ‘it takes two to tango’.
The development of mind-control has been that of a sense of disconnection from a Source Nature that cannot be defined or controlled – yet BY definitions, images, concepts maps and models have we introduced rules and filters of control – that serve purpose WITHIN the specific identity-complex, belief system, ideology or world-view.
Many see the development of consciousness – for all its pain of conflict as an essentially done deal – as if to enjoy the fruits of a world effectively mapped out and explained in core terms if not at the periphery.
The expansion of a projected consciousness creates time and place as a ‘learning experience’ – not in the sense of accumulating or glorification of ‘knowledge’ but learning as transformational.
We may bemoan a lack of critical thinking but I feel the basis for sanity is of a capacity to observe thinking-in-act rather than running as the product of thoughts we are mostly unaware of. Inevitably ego seeks to weaponise and marketise insight – but then that is no longer insight by repackaged insight taken out of context and used in vain or vanity of self-aggrandisement.
I like the idea that the ego always paints itself into a corner.
What is the brush but self-concept?
I write from felt qualities that move me or within me. That I have acquired language for inner experience has not blocked the felt terrain – perhaps because I am wary of mapping for its ability to just that.
The very notion of heart control is an oxymoron – excepting a concept of heart is used as a proxy for the mind. We’re good at that.
The puzzle come somehow together around many sources and angles just to realize it is there inside us through the self’s connection to cosmos where the ego disappear.
Black Elk and Sitting Bull spoke about it, the Scriptures tells it, Einstein ended up there, Krishnamurti and Science circulate around it, Rudolph Steiner, Professor Efimov/St.Petersborg, m.m., all circulate around same thing.
All do they end up in and around the same conclusion although we have not got there fully yet and maybe are still far from.
But the hard long work toward the divine melting point is a work with much satisfaction, joy and happiness.”
Beware of “organisation”. It is wholly unnecessary. The Scripture’s rules will be the only rules you need. Do not seek to bind other’s consciences, and do not permit others to bind yours.
Believe and obey so far as you can understand God’s word today, and so continue growing in grace and knowledge and love day by day. Russel/1895.
I often let a consideration of themes rise from reading others’s sharing.
‘Organisation’ relative to Spirit – which is Whole in all its parts that cannot be objectified BUT THAT IN CONCEPT WE DO and we are be-living the fruits of our definitions, logical predictive outcomes, and attempts to protect our ‘sand castle’ illusions from the tides of change. That we know not what we do (at this level) results in becoming ‘trapped’ in our own war on reality from a corner we have painted ourselves into.
Organised religion is an oxymoron – for your Covenant with your Creator Is the organizing and unifying principle of your life.
The mind that would set order is the reaction to perceived or feared disorder, and thus makes real the thing it would overcome, escape or stamp out. So in the name or under the symbols of life will the mind seek to unify, regain, fulfill or complete a sense of lack, deprivation drawn from a past set in grievance or pain of loss or disconnection.
Judgement DOES this, but having judged, the mind becomes split by its own logical contradictions.
Organic or living process of communication and exchange can be modeled and mimicked in form -but without living context, by the mind that ‘sees’ only the image and form of behaviors as confirmation of its own role in representing and defending an existence (focus) as a mind in a body in a world of pain, loss, treachery and threat. A self and world of conflicting meanings that the mind learns to organize as a sense of relatively stable BY limitation and sacrifice acted out on bodies as confirmation of judgements of the mind.
I hold that communioned being always already underlies an overmasking ‘reality adjuster’, by which we unfold life as an experience of a creative consciousness – within a deeper embrace of an Infinity that may be discarded or disregarded by the shifting spotlight of a mind set in its own conflicts.
So I don’t see a melting pot or merging of egos but a revealing of uniqueness in truly shared purpose. Only love truly shares, fear can only mimic an image and form of social masking agreements to ‘join’ in limited terms and conditions. There’s the ‘organizing structure of minds framed in judgement. But to play the game we have to learn to turn a blind eye – while setting a focus in a ‘something else’.
Scripture that resonates and reflects what is written on the heart, can serve to open, abide, grow and extend the qualities of the heart – while living the almost overwhelmingly real experience of separation, challenge and growth.
True with-ness joins in Spirit, in shared worth-ship.
An untrained mind recoils from Infinity or gift without measure – as fear of total loss. Hence a self and world of ‘limited’ sacrifice seeks to forfend or bargain with fear of non-existence.
While we run a false inheritance we ‘forget’ our true Father – yet only the false or fatherless illusion is ‘threatened’ by reality in truth.
A willingness to be of service in ‘my father’s house’ is not a reset of a wish for autonomy of personally authorized creations – but accepting alignment in a true inherence.
To be no more and no less than we are cannot take ‘effort’ so much as be vigilant against self-denial or self aggrandizements of a mind that – if unchecked – can run a head of our selves.
What is discernment BUT the gift of the Spirit to a willingness to listen. But who can hear if they ‘already know’ the problem in terms of the ‘solutions’ that confirm their role-base identity in countermeasures?
For me this part on organisation, an oxymoron (organised religion) as you correctly say, is a very important one in order to liberate ones self.
Not in ego form, but in the realisation of our free ability to serve the divine.
People do search for an identity where they can like themselves free from the inferiority they have when they compare to their fellow man.
Socialist, Christian, Republican, Opera Singer, Popular, whatever fine title will do.
But it is a trap for the soul and can lead to false ego as you also write.
Seeking toward the divine is the humble work to perfect ones special ability(ies) as much as possible while we are here;
Martial art black belt 6 Dan, football player, ballet, carpentry, farmer, shoemaker, hair dresser.
All disciplines have the ability to satisfy the soul toward perfectionism in honour of our Creator, a hard work which we(I) call toward the melting point where we can say ‘now I am together with and honour my divine Creator’.
Yes. If love is the organising principle and active agency – then a-tempts to grasp or wield a ‘special love’ will grow abilities that take limited forms, terms and conditions as a ruled mind of terms and conditions.
This can be represented as the Prodigal Son – the focus of an ego-development.
The re-cognition of the Father –or true Inherence– allows both integration and redemption of all that we have made ‘apart’ to service of the whole (in my Father’s House).
Again, the ego a-tempts to usurp the Spirit’s function by replacing a Living Will with structures of belief, definition, prediction and control.
Growing a discernment is ‘listening within the whole for the movement or gift of a living will’. The mind is very quick, and can run a head that knows not what it does if operating from its own thinking, hence the need for awareness in the moment or situation at hand – rather than scattered in fragments of past and future conflicts or tensions seeking resolution.
Our abilities grow consciousness of intention, desire and fulfilment. When people in fear and threat lose their connection it is to the imperative that something must be done which also manifests as we must do something – compulsion that also becomes a basis for channelling conflicted energies into reaction – which relives some of the pressure.
But the primary need of a loss of connection or loss of communication is to reconnect first as a basis to see and act from.
Whatever you do, do it in remembrance of Me is simply a call for connected being – not an extra tax of trying to think about what we ‘should be’.
That we each and all express a unique constellation of the qualities of life only ‘makes perfect sense’ in the light of the Creator. To be undone of self-illusion is to be revealed in light – already One Light. The melt-down of the ego will periodically purge or release us of what we -as a result – recognise we do not truly want and has no true belonging in us– including responsibilities we took on that were never ours -but instead lost sight of what truly and timelessly ours.
We cannot judge over and apart from reality – but that we judge ourselves thereby. Yet the wish to create reality is the Creative spark of our being. The mindset that ‘steals the light’ cannot create In Light (Prometheus/Prodigal) but thinks in secret as a masking off from and learned disregard for Infinity.
This shapes language and mind control of consciousness development. (The theme of this web article).
911 is the North American emergency call for help (that has been misused to ratchet global mind control over a corrupted and collapsing negative Economy.
Yet the symbols reveal signature patterns that can also serve ‘waking up’ to a mind control rather than doubling down in a reset at another level of contraction.
Bottoming out is a term for the turning or tipping point of an addiction. Until there is a fundamental shift the mind of control cannot know what it does, for it runs from and of a disconnection and dissociation from who and what it Is – along with all that lives.
I might have thought that the term, “human sacrifice”, would have become more common when describing the crimes of the state; if not following “September 11, 2001” (with deference to Mr. Curtain’s fine article), but more ubiquitously following the COVID mass experimentation event.
Belief in the demand or dictate for sacrifice is ‘built into’ the ego of judgements as polarized opposing ‘realities’.
While such a focus ‘runs dark mode’ control ‘narratives’ live while we sleep.
Scapegoating or the assigning of collective guilt as a basis to sanctify attack runs the means to maintain the split while saving the form, the image, the theory, model or mind thereof.
Taken to its root – a sense of separate or self-special existence is claimed by the denial of Wholeness – as in Cain and Abel.
We learn to sacrifice our true self to ‘learn and adapt’ such a world.
The ‘gain of function’ we then run on, is founded on the loss of another.
True function in life aligns in joy of being.
A-tempts to force or control life reduce it to the ‘hit’ of winning or being ‘right’ or boosted in some ritualized repetition of attempt to regain the feeling of truly being alive.
Killing God, killing God’s Son (true expression) is the predicate of a mind set ‘free’ to self-create in its own image.
The wish to create becomes framed by a will to remake a (self and) world in our own image. As life isn’t here to support our ego, we learn to hate its treachery and seek to reduce, confine and force or eradicate it for a better version. Under the banner of a ‘better world’ does the hatred and treachery of denied self-specialness enact vengeance on a life it cannot feel, see or recognize for blind allegiance to a dead idea, ideal, idol, or model of life given worship over truth – over ‘what is’ – in this situation, moment, exchange, relationship, or event.
Rather than regress to yet deeper self-hatred and denial, why not be curious from an innocence of a being we did not and do not create?
It only require we accept that we may be wrong, we do not truly know, we don’t want our current outcome and are open to learning a way of seeing truly and thus uncovering choices that bring better outcomes.
We can only start from where we are. All other endeavours – no matter how grand in scale or vision, must come back to this point, even if they reach to the heavens before recognising a false foundation cannot stand; idols must fall.
Another murky trail:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466K
The book about Kirk’s murder the 10 Sept 2025 was published on 09 Sept 2025, and has thus been written well before Kirk was killed.
I anticipate it is just one more Tower 7, Aluminium meets RC Concrete as a knife through butter on a hot summer night, the Moon Landing whatever.
But, ……..quite impressive what they can come up with ‘over there’.
Wow nice catch.
In 1995, Benjamin Netanyahu wrote in his book that militant islam would bring down the World Trade Center. Political propaganda in the 90s was very much concentrated on the threat of militant / fundamentalist / terroristic Muslims, and even sociology was concentrated on culture wars and fear of islam.
So the ones they wanted to destroy were labeled as enemies, terrorists, extremists.
Wars are very beneficial to state power and money power.
WTC “Bombings” Admitted by Netanyahu and Mainstream Media:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jH3bOrAXnNzu
I see it like Israel knew they were causing much anger in their surroundings before year 2000, why they out of fear tried to demonisize their ‘opponents’ moslems/palestine as terrorists.
In order to exaggerate their own picture, they organise finance and weapon to among other Hamas and feed other radical groups, ‘See What We Said’.
But from real life I know Muslims were well respected in London before the 9/11 case as people whose word you could trust and who didnt take usury from loans.
First after 9/11 the picture turned 180 degree.
How’s about we start loudly promoting the name of the man whose work on 9/11 stands head and shoulders above the rest in terms of unveiling the forces behind 9/11. That name is Christopher Bollyn. Funny how his name never manages to hit the articles or the comments of just about anywhere. Why is that? He is still virtually unknown, yet he solved 9/11 more than two decades ago. He released books with all the evidence. He toured the world to get his message out. There must be plenty of important people in the US military and intel community who are aware of him. Ditto the world over. Ditto many journalists. No one will say his name. They all say NOTHING about the huge pile of evidence sat there collecting dust that solves huge sections of the 9/11 riddle. That is the level of mind control you are dealing with.
Christopher Bollyn Lays It All Out For You In Under An Hour: TRICKED INTO WAR
https://archive.org/details/TrickedIntoWar
Christopher Bollyn’s Work:
https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Christopher%20Bollyn%22
Nah, he strikes me as controlled op. Judy Woods’ work is much closer to the truth.
I cannot loan money from Christopher Bollyn. I need money!! Do you hear me?
I need money or gold, otherwise I cant function, the girls will disappear in a minute.
How do you react when I ask you or Christopher Bollyn for a loan? You will both turn your back to me immediately, show me a cold shoulder. You will refuse to answer me ever again.
You and Chris will avoid me any time in the future I come near you. You see the pic?
I think he stopped speaking publicly in about 2015?
Maybe he got a message.
I wonder what he thinks of the situation now, after Oct 7?
Perhaps he is content being away from it all.
It seems like yesterday, and a long, long time ago. That’s been my experience, because every day it’s been the same old same old for 24 years: daily rinse and repeat the mind control until the steady war of attrition stinks of corruption that stretches back even longer, as recollection of propagandists like Lippman illustrates.
Which is why I don’t think we need some new vocabulary to speak of any of the terrible things the psywar continues to conceal and enable. That seems to promise no more than further idle chatter to join academic exercises in ritual observance of history’s nightmares.
What breaks the prison of language to control the narrative is communicating dissent in action, not just with this or that event, or spectacle, but with an entire social system predicated on power over our perceptions, our experience, our lives. Without steady revolutionary movement to build a world where lies no longer rule the many to enrich the few, we remain spectators to our own demise.
“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”
—Karl Rove
The new reality study is of debt, and the losing of ones mind.
If this is reality, I refuse reality.
Yes, but once we, the people aware of the mechanics of this realm, inform enough other (currently asleep) people of this meta-physical knowledge, we can create our own, better, as in less tyrannical world (create our own harmonic version of reality).
Unfortunately, most people have no interest in exploring the mechanics of the realm/reality. They either remain as materialists, or religious believers or fall into the New Age psyop trap. Then once comfortable in their belief system they stop inquiring any further.
Most people, yes, they still are not curious, but I have never seen so many people as I do currently (compared to before the 2020s) explore subjects like metaphysics and the electrical universe (including stuff like plasma/aether and magnetobiology) and other things related to the nature of reality incl. philosophically so I am heartened a bit.
We are busy. If we are busy and the harvest is good why should we bother for trouble? https://youtu.be/RhR0PoIXtjo .
As is written “Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”—Matthew 6:3
What are you banging on about?
So now you are panning for a few nuggets of go!d in the Yukon river and what has that got to do with a metaphysical conversation?
Beside, I thought you claimed to have a literal ton of gold previously. Yeh, of course, in your dreams.
I sent you proof in form of a digital video with updated e-security.
The gold in Yukon river is metaphysical reality.
“mechanics of the realm/reality” as you call it. That was my point.
Pls dont get pessed because I was right again again. 😋 .
Yes, words are more than just words. We accept their meaning without understanding that a word could have one or more meanings. We accept authority when, in fact, authority requires our consent. We take for granted words in different formats as having no difference, ie, all caps and lower case. We accept our title of MR or MRS without question.
We accept a number code to relate to our identity, ie, a tax or social security number.
We accept a term such as Procurator Fiscal v You. Who the fk are you?
Dear Sir/Madam. Who the fk is Sir or Madam?
We accept unsigned legal documents issued by courts. Mainly because they are a fraud.
Yes, words are spells and the wizards have cast their spells on all ‘Persons’, who haven’t yet grown a brain cell.
And if one is a pseudolaw shaman with no historical knowledge of the law as it developed from 1066 onwards (oi yew: wot ‘appened in 1066?) one engages in magical utterances and fervently believes that capitalisation and other conventions are as powerful say as astrology and voodoo ……one does not want as an obedient little UK/Aust/Can/US burgher to admit that that Law flows from Power: its all too horribly Continental
Scared Im getting near the truth Jenner. You see I have tried and tested it in court and the jesters fell apart.
Its not 1066 you need to talk about, its 1666 you know, the great London clear out to make way for the Dutch bankers who funded William on condition those arseholes took control of the country and separated their own square mile, outwith our system. A bit like the Vatican and Washington DC.
BS inasmuch you people are eager to use Magna Carta from 1215 when it suits you Yes the City is a legal anomaly but this does not imply the truth of your capitalisation fantasies and cestui qui vie and Admiralty law and all the rest, which you cut and paste as you see fit. In fact you are a danger to the Movement, if the enemy did not already have you to distract us from the Internet of Bionanothings eg https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/study-of-biochips-found-in-covid?publication_id=956088&post_id=173596947&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxNjE0ODA0MCwicG9zdF9pZCI6MTczNTk2OTQ3LCJpYXQiOjE3NTc4NzQ5MzcsImV4cCI6MTc2MDQ2NjkzNywiaXNzIjoicHViLTk1NjA4OCIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.duydwvi3bjMhtfUySqf3dAVbjWQ-3eU1we3EfZD7O8A&r=9m3wo&triedRedirect=true. it would need to invent you
A courageous military action against a Bill Gates experiment
“Last month, the military government of Burkina Faso has done what no Western regulator dared to do: it ordered the immediate termination of Bill Gates’ genetically modified mosquito project—‘Target Malaria’—and the destruction of all bioengineered insect samples inside the country.
This wasn’t a health agency issuing a polite memo.
It was a military crackdown on a Gates-funded scheme that released engineered mosquitoes into villages without real informed consent from the people forced to live with the consequences.”
-more- https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/military-shuts-down-bill-gates-genetically
Bully for them!
Great! So human experiments is Bill Gates favourite pervert hobby. Off course filtered with many buzzword reports about peace and liberty and poverty doing goody goody.
Shouldn’t a murder in Utah involving a suspect arrested in Utah be a matter for Utah law enforcement to handle?
Help me out if I haven’t attended to every detail. But why did the FBI jump into the middle of this matter within 17 minutes of the murder and take control of this investigation and ship evidence out to FBI labs in Virginia for processing like they did when JFK was killed?
If you want to ‘deprogramme’ people you have to remove the inputs. It used to be quite easy to do this: just go somewhere where US propaganda doesn’t exist.
I forever became desensitised to UK propaganda after living abroad twice: 1982/3 and 1989/90. You simply live day to day not worrying about world events, not making central to your decision-making.
When the inputs are removed you are to experience the inputs of the real world. Human voices, classical music and literature etc etc etc. No TV and in the modern age, no social media either.
Just imagine 250 million US citizens closing their accounts at Facebook and X. Switching off CNN, Fox News etc etc.
Can you really see anyone going to war on the USA in the Lower 48?
It won’t be Europe, Africa or the rest of America, be that Central- or South America.
When was the last time Russia, China or India waged war with the USA, eh?
Just imagine 250 million people not believing that Putin or Xi were about to nuke them.
Just imagine 250 million people saying ‘Why are we funding Israel?’
What a threat that would be to the brainwashers, eh?
Don’t forget Marvin the Martian, he could begin a war where even the survivors can’t stomach the outcome.
Ah, but there are always meteorites on a trajectory to earth, ET invasions and flying viruses to scare and subdue the people…
Sow the seeds of fear and what do you reap?
Poisonous plants.
I pretty much started calling it the war OF terror right off the bat (an American baseball term). Never caught on but I still do it. Unless more of us actually do it, it won’t get done. I’m for freedom and liberty, we all have one life to live. That’s it. Damned if we should let these rich lunatic psychos control our lives from birth to death. So here’s one, instead of the Maga cult, I’m now saying Maga Totalitarians. You got to hit where it hurts. Totalitarianism ain’t patriotism, not in the U.S. Make em look in the damn mirror. And no, that’s not partisan, the woke left is fully on that bandwagon also.
Some deaths are more valuable than others. Seems those whose death
can be weaponised for use in ideological battles are far more valuable
than any other death… (anon)…
Me, me, me, and more of me.
P.S. Add-on to my long comment (which is still pending).
Words – flooding our airwaves with the same words, repeatedly – like our 24/7 live rolling MSM (and controlled alternative news)
Why did the BBC from 15:00 to 16:56 today (almost 2 whole hours) continue to cover this one, single story – almost nobody in the UK had heard of Charlie Kirk before (see link below)? I reckon if there is a false flag at tomorrow’s Tommy Robinson-organised protest we will know the timing of all these things are/were important for the psyops; and all the subsequent restrictions that will be imposed on us due to these false flags e.g. more rights being taken away, civil unrest, martial law, and Digital ID being imposed on us, etc?
https://nitter.poast.org/SaulStaniforth/status/1966517583475032135#m
Nobody heard of him in the US before either. If this isn’t a perfect example of a psyop, then perfect is a truckstop in texas.
My comment about words, theatre and illusion is pending…
The controlled opposition’s use of “No Farmers No Food” is also a good example of language mind control. As Piers Corbyn says, rightly, we should actually say things like: “Yes, more farmers, more food”.
As you mentioned in your comment further down words have power in the sense that they can be used for spells (spelling).
The literal chant of “No farmers, no food” is negatively worded, invoking no more farmers and no more food. Although, manifestation does not seem to work in this reality/realm without the correct intention and actions that follow it, it is better to affirm in the positive.
When the “unthinkable” happens, you have to “build back better!”
Visual artists for truth can break thru?!
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm2z30p033ro
I will repost my comment as there was an error in it (Rolling Rock’s comments are on the other article not this one).
Excellent analysis of the use of language in propaganda. My concern has been : when the truth about the collapsed towers finally emerges, will anyone be paying attention?
Or will further unspeakable horrors have occurred and stories about some towers, long ago, are of little interest.
So the whole thing is hypnosis in “real time” i.e. saying the phrases carefully calculated for the requisite effect as the event is happening.
And of course, the same device applies to covid too. “People before profits”, “the new normal”, “off the scale”, “We’re all in it together”, “flatten the curve”, the interminable repetition on the word “surge” and its derivatives, “tsunami” also (though a little more sparingly due to its possible over-emphasis), etc.
In some ways the covid scam was easier since it didn’t’ depend on one specific event. And the mind controllers knew they could rely on that ever-present minority of impressionable hypochondriacs that always lead every incident through being the loudest. All you had to do was feed in the aforementioned scary sounds and the theatrical dying swans can be depended on to start improvising their own scenarios.
And if some of those dumbass additions ae rumbled as dumbass, you can always shrug and talk about “overreaction” just as you stir the pot for more of that “overreaction”.
Break it all down, break it all down, break it down. We love you for so many reasons.
https://youtu.be/DmWWqogr_r8 .
Too many people over the years have underestimated the fact that words (many that seem so benign even) are used for manipulation. There are researchers who even reckon that the modern English language itself was set-up to be ripe for mind-control, hypnotism and spells. A good example is that words are used for labelling which on the surface seems harmless enough (and of course ic useful for categorising things which is needed sometimes), but labelling is also a form of limitation and this can make it ripe for manipulation. In politics, labelling yourself as left or right can make you a tool for the manipulators which leads me to the next thing I am about to write:
There’s important things people need to understand or be reminded of. I know a lot of you know all this stuff already but it is good to highlight it again so the people still not awake can hopefully see it now:
We are living in a world of theatre/movies, an era awash with deceit and illusion. The global establishment have a network of agents (covert as well as overt) who play all sides in every psychological operation (as well as the puppets in our governments, and the MSM and so-called alternative media like GB News and Canary news who continually push the left and right poles to try to keep us all in their prescribed parameters). The TPTB themselves are united, there is no left and right for them but they do use these words (which are prescribed poles) for their agents/actors to play their parts and to try to keep the general public divided.
TPTB’s prescribed extreme poles e.g. left vs right, far right vs Islamist extremists, foreigners vs natives, radical conservatives vs radical feminists, etc. are very useful for them during their operations. When a false flag or psyop occurs and even if the public do not react emotionally in the way tptb want us to – they will use their actors, agents and crisis-actors to play their roles of the ’emotional-reaction’ general public instead. The very recent high-profile incident saturating our media around us is a case in point. Most ordinary folk observing it in the real world are thinking “uh, oh, another false flag/psyop so let’s take a closer look, examine it before coming to any conclusions” (see my other comments on the other article); but in contrast, TPTB’s agents and actors on both sides (left and right) play their allotted roles: the left cheering on and inciting more violence, and the right vowing retribution so tptb hope a cycle of violence starts and ultimately civil unrest occurs so they can bring in more restrictions, martial law and bring in their beloved digital prison/panopticom. Rolling Rock in his comments below is astute to show us a good example too – pointing out Tommy Robinson’s two roles as both a far right activist and Islamist extremist! The global establishment are definitely having a laugh and do not care any more if people realise what they are doing, it seems.
Nothing is what it seems and we DO live in a world of deceit, theatre and illusion operated by secret networks of agents – freemasons and other mason-type organisations, and the sayanim network (see Victor Ostrovsky’s work for more details e.g. his books ‘By Way of Deception’ and ‘The Other Side of Deception’). We must also be aware that the use of words, labelling, prescribed parameters & poles are a part of the manipulation that they use on us.
Jaysus,
most “ordinary folk” were queued around the block to get their co-n-vid jab and boosters.
95% of ordinary folk are gullible, guilty, self-centred, stupid voken a -holes.
Before and during covid, yes, people were very much asleep, but it was covid’s subsequent diktats, restrictions, and the minority’s resolute dissent that awakened many of the asleep public. There is no way that most of the public will fall so hard for such psychological operations and false flags again. Also, before covid, when people — especially the British where we haven’t had any tyranny since WW2 in contrast to e.g. South American countries or the Greeks — were still naive about state tyranny, the many hypochondriacs (found in most countries’ populations) used the pandemic to vent their spleen. Well, even the hypochondriacs now know that jabs are not what they seem, etc.
It will be very, very difficult to pull-off theatrics and illusions now. “Once bitten, twice, shy” is an accurate saying in this instance, and time will show it to us, but importantly, as I said in my long comment: watch for the actors playing both (all) sides, literally!
It seems that this is an actor based reality with those in the public eye being aided and placed into position using a well-oiled media machine to give them the good and/or bad publicity to cement their role in the public perception. Also, the power of the media – MSM, alternative and social media can be used to switch the actors from ‘good guy’ to ‘bad guy’ status and vice versa. The MSM can condemn an actor to the role of bad guy while the alternative and social media can give them cult status as a good guy. The level of manipulation of public perception is complex. Long gone are the days of simply not trusting the MSM and trusting the alternative media.
Some actors are more obvious than others in their roles but getting people to see the deception is harder. Once someone has been brainwashed to be loyal and trust a character it is difficult to break the spell. The cult of personality is a strong attraction, that is why many figures on the world stage are cast as larger than life characters, in order to create the buy-in to either love or hate them.
These are world stage performances played by Live Action Role Players. Each role played contributes towards the end goals of the controllers. In creating the duality, the tension between polarities, they can nudge and steer the audience (us), in effect to gain our consent in the process towards the outcome – the singularity that they desire.
Thesis +Antithesis = Synthesis.
Nobody knows why the gods make you do the same things as they had to do.
“The cult of personality is a strong attraction, that is why many figures on the world stage are cast as larger than life characters, in order to create the buy-in to either love or hate them.”
Yes, that is why it is wise to just USE (as in highlight and share with others) each good piece of truth that a certain ‘public figure’, website or ‘influencer’ says, but never trust or ‘follow’ them as a rule. For instance, it is wise to observe a wide range of websites, influencers, public figures from different countries, ideologies, etc. and pick and discern what info you think is the most accurate or closest to the truth, then see if other people or websites concur, then go from there. Even the MSM or so-called alt-media sometimes shows or tells us the truth when they ‘bait-and-switch’ or place the truth ‘hidden in plain sight’, as it were. That has been my MO for over a decade now and it has served me well in my discernment process. Pieces of truth trump loyalty to websites/influencers.
Also, most in-you-face public figures, influencers and websites with high popularity numbers (and sometimes unpopular ones too though, so best to not be too complacent!) is a dead give-away for being propagandists – these types give approx. 80% truth and 20% mis-direction or mis/dis-info (and omission) of the most vitally important facts/knowledge.
Lastly,
What most lackey freem asons, the majority lower level ones (who are the people helping build the Great Reset/NWO/Golden Age/The New Age for their masters using these ‘alchemical’ processes) do not understand is that they are the tools of supremacist Jud aism which uses the kab balah to control them. Even top 33-degree Albert Pike mentioned it in his book ‘Morals and Dogma’ (page 626):
“The Kaba lah is the key of the occult sciences; and the Gnosticism, Hermeticism, alchemy, and Freem asonry were born of the Kaba lists.”
FM (along with the new age followers) are ‘tool’s in every sense of the word.
With regard to lower level Masons, most are well meaning if misguided. Obviously, some are placed as change agents and useful idiots into certain roles and this is more so with the higher degrees. It seems to work as a filtering process to identify useful people and to place them in positions of influence to enact policies.
The role of the Kaballah and its influence is widely underestimated. Its mystic occultism (hidden) seems to underpin much of metaphysical belief system of the controllers senior minions.
I have a particular distaste for New Agers. They really are useful idiots, with their ‘love and light’ passivity. Often carrying a lot of emotional baggage they latch onto the controlled opposition gurus, lose any independent thought in the process and are cultlike in their groupthink, yet are very smug in their ‘superior’ knowledge.
They will be the first to be naively shepherded into the One World Religion of the NWO.
“With regard to lower level Masons, most are well meaning if misguided.”
Yes, some of the low level ones, but you would think after all this time and having the internet at our fingertips for a few decades now, if you had decided to ‘lock’ yourself into a group such as the FM (with its emphasis on helping brothers ‘get on’ which is related to power, etc), you would make sure that you researched it in-depth! So they should really know what it is REALLY about (not just the official narrative). I reckon too many do not care about corruption and the bigger plan (some may be a bit too selfish and have short-term thinking. Not all though as you say.
The reason to be shy about joining any type of group is that most groups are hierarchical and are opaque at the top and use compartmentalism (as FM does) and therefore it can be difficult to find out if the group has an over-arching nefarious system and plan, ahem!!
It is almost impossible to get out, and if it happen it is normally with big consequences.
The group think secure a freezer around the rebellion.
I have to admit that I am a bit more dismissive of controlled opposition even though I am aware that they put out good infomation, yet sometimes trying to sort the wheat from the chaff is too time consuming.
“Thesis +Antithesis = Synthesis.”
Yes, they love their processes: the Hegelian dialects, duality, etc. aka alchemy & transmutation.
My Last comment.
These are my reasons why these supremacists (FM & Js) should be regarded with the utmost derision – because they hide the most vitally important knowledge from the masses in order to control and dumb-down, and ultimately control the whole world. These people are not elites: they are not the cream of the world, they are simply selfish, greedy and cowardly deceivers who put all that is worthy and harmonic in this world/realm at risk – all for their lust for complete (delusional) power. For instance, if they hadn’t kept the cyclical cataclysms (if it turns out that this theory is true) hidden from the masses – maybe we would have better solutions for survival because more brains than a few can come up with more ideas. But as usual, everything they do and use is about consolidation of power – they hid these upcoming disasters from the masses so they can use them for their control-freakery, keeping the status quo and global hegemony rather than be good, moral and wise and try to help as many people as possible survive and not go through so much suffering (and ultimately help bring more harmony to this world/realm). Nope, as I said: greed, selfishness and ego (deviousness and power) is all that matters for them.
I said the other week – these supremacist-types are the true ‘incels’ of the world because they are inadequate. Why? Because they do not have the inner strength, magnanimity or bravery (some would say connection to humanity or empathy) to live around others in the world along with their lust for power & control so they have to use unfair means like deceit, ruthlessness, anti-social behaviour, and cowardly brutal tactics in order to satisfy this lust (control-freakery). Normal people do not have to see themselves as special over others or act tyrannically or be control-freaks to live happily in this world and be around other people: their desire for harmony for everyone is more important than power & control of the clique – and above all, they just want to be left alone to live their lives, especially as we do not know (yet) how or why we came to exist in this world/realm in the first place (and didn’t consciously make the decision to be here, well, with the limited knowledge we have so far).
Rant over! 🙂
*Should say: “Normal people do not have to see themselves as special over others or act tyrannically or be control-freaks to live happily in this world and be around other people: their desire for harmony for everyone is more important than power & control FOR the clique”
Tell that to a New Ager and they will tell you that we chose to reincarnate over and over to learn lessons and any suffering is part of the lesson, no matter how bad. Each time with a memory wipe so that we have no conscious recollection – very useful for learning lessons!
Keep coming back for more, never good quite enough to escape for good.
Yeah, New Age stuff is bollox. I always ask ardent new agers – how do you know all this? How do you know this stuff is true? And ask them things like: “So who or what designed this system we live in that makes us have ‘bad karma’ so easily, and that we ourselves somehow (no idea how?) choose to reincarnate, etc. ‘coz whoever or whatever these controllers are, they are very sadistic, don’t you agree?! Why comply with it all?!”
It is funny how the elitists live to 100 years old or close to it, suffer little or no ill health, have all the material wealth they could want, yet are responsible for diabolical suffering enacted against other living beings.
So much for bad karma, it seems that they are exempt from it. Bad karma is a belief system based on guilt which seems only to affect those who believe in it.
No guilt, therefore no bad karma effect.
On the opposite side of the karma scales, I can think of people who have earned plenty of good karma credits but life does not reward them for it.
Ha! Yes, very good point! Somehow this ‘karma’ system does not work for them only the masses! Funny that…
I was trying to figure out when the gods had to add a “z” to the alphabet to continue the evolution of the planet, sometime in the 1800’s so far
Thank you Edward for this accounting. Your personal family and friend connection to that event is mind blowing. I totally agree with you that the over and over, repeated use of word conditioning is the glue that these elites use to protect their crimes from rational discovery. Contemporarily, I have notice how Webster’s dictionary meanings get politically morphed into new, even opposite definitions as needed.
As a kid I was told, all details of the JFK assassination would not be released for 75 years. This proved to me then that there was secrecy and cover up of inconvenient truths. Then I experienced seeing RFK, MLK and Malcolm’s assassinations surrounded by the same word salad of lies. I walked into work on S11 where a coworker was watching the towers demolitioned, even the NBC broadcaster noticed that. It was the first thing I noticed. When Bldg 7 dropped, no smoke, fire, anything, I knew this was another “assassination” of truth. When I saw Bush Baby’s face on TV after being notified, at that Florida grammar school (in a personal note, my future wife was protesting outside the school at that time), my interpretation, he reacted as if he knew. He was never a good actor and lied constantly.
People somehow assume our “leaders” could never be so evil, so assume belief of their narratives. The inconvenient truth would be to admit being an obedient subject under an evil empire. Proof of this organized evil is so obvious, even on the surface. For instance the assassination of Charlie Kirk was decried in every MSM account as such an “unthinkable evil, how could it happen?”. But where was the “unthinkable”, when that Congressional/Administration hearing manufactured a false WMD accusation on Iraq (who had nothing to do with S11) and then invaded and “assassinated” over half a million Iraqis? Public guilt, for watching and accepting this horror is unconscionable.
How blatant and obvious does the truth have to get to break the evil magician’s spells on America? Possibly we need a new objectivity in perceiving language on a daily basis. If one watches broadcast TV now, fewer products and services’ ads are repeated hundreds of times, opposed to a past where hundreds were repeated a few times. Repetition seems key to lock in clouds of illusion as perceived fact. Seems to me words, like flags, are just representations and worthy of personal inspection and burning as needed.
Twenty-Four years later and with a plethora of evidence to show that it was a deep state job – aided and abetted by the Israeli’s, and still the perps that are still alive – who either planned or participated in it, are still walking around as free as air, what does that say about Americans?
Guilty as charged.
Always ask: Cui bono? “… aided and abetted by … ?
To be quite concrete, Cui Bono? President Bush and his family’s Oil Empire.
The act was used as an excuse to invade Iraq and steal Iraq’s oil to the Bush Family’s controlled oil companies.
Maybe many more people Bono’ed, but the above was the immediate line.
I were in East North Africa in the late 1990’es and the popular language among those in public service was the Anglo-Sax (US) Empires military actions in ME for first of all their oil.
I am lost for words for praise of this piece. It literally has it all — well written, well argued and so on. Its difficult to reason about events without falling into the twin traps of getting lost in a maze of individual details or using a brush so broad that it invites straying into tinfoil hat territory. This piece avoids these twin traps. Having personal connections to the area and events seems to be potentially disadvantageous because it would permit the timely application of smoke (“personal grudge”?) to a set of events that seemed logically connected even to someone like myself who has absolutely no connection with government, power, NYC, Twin Towers — anything. As someone who’s always been aware of Orwell’s work on language, politics and power its easy to pick up on the nuances of what’s being said even if the people making statements are themselves unaware of the connection between what they’re saying and the overall picture. The linguistic pieces all slotted together like the components of an infernal machine with events — contrived or opportunistic — being created or adopted as convenient.
The name of the game is obviously the consolidation of power. Its an obvious goal but also a flawed one because it assumes that the only power and culture in our world is the Eurocentric one, the one based on European empires or lookalikes — that’s been dominant for the last 500 years or so. The glaring weakness in all this is that it discounts other cultures and potential seats of power. Reducing the Middle East to a shambles, a series of weak, disorganized, vassal states dominated by one nominally Western allied power might have seemed like a good idea 25 years ago but its singular focus overlooked other potential power blocs. Now we’re trying to play catch-up, playing the same kinds of games that we always did but with ‘adversaries’ who are not only cognizant of the game but not really interested in playing it. Our propaganda mouthpieces — the media — will bleat on about ‘they’re all the same’ or ‘they’re in the same economic boat as us, just you wait and see’ or even recycle tired old Cold War tropes about Freedom and Democracy, painting ‘them’ as some dark, dangerous, other where one misstatement can cut short your career (or even your life) but its just not working the way it should. Put simply, the masses aren’t quite as pliable as they used to be, there’s been way too much communication and not yet enough time to poison enough media sources (“Bring on the AI — Stat!”) to drive the herd reliably.
Incidentally, I surely wasn’t the only person to regard “Pearl Harbor” — the movie — as a PoS, a perversion of history with lousy special effects and an overly jingoistic tone. But then I’m the generation who grew up with “Torah! Torah! Torah!”, the version that was done properly that presented a much more nuanced view of the attack. (It also used real planes, real people, real Japanese and apparently staging the attack on Pearl Harbor cost more than the actual attack did.)(That’s inflation for you.) But the 60s were a time when Power went for broke, overdid it and very nearly blew it. Restoring the status quo took the best part of a decade and now, with the changing of the generations, its ideas and ideals are being lost (as is the generation, you know, the ones that “lived of the fat of the land”, “ruined the economy for future generations” etc. For people who haven’t seen “Torah!” I’d recommend watching it and comparing it to “Pearl Harbor” — and then everything in this article will suddenly slide into very sharp focus.
Outstanding article from a very credible source. I am convinced that America has been taken over by evil. Our destruction is not merely probable, it is guaranteed. The Bible has no mention of the west at all in prophecy except for perhaps a weak protest, a small voice, emanating from a position of former power now gone. (Ezekiel 38:13)
First Class !