conflict zones, latest, Middle East, Syria, Turkey
Comments 23

Obama’s “Safe Zone” in Syria intended to turn it into new Libya

by Shamus Cooke

7.si

The road to war is paved with a thousand lies. A fresh fib was tossed on the lie-cluttered warpath to Syria, when it was announced that the U.S. and Turkey would create a “safe zone” inside of Syria — supposedly to be aimed against ISIS.

This “safe zone” is a major escalation of war, but it was described in soft tones by the media, sounding almost cuddly. In reality, however, a “safe zone” is a “no-fly zone,” meaning that a nation is planning to implement military air superiority inside the boundaries of another nation. It’s long recognized by the international community and U.S. military personnel as a major act of war. In a war zone an area is made “safe” by destroying anything in it or around that appears threatening.

Turkey has been demanding this no-fly zone from Obama since the Syrian war started. It’s been discussed throughout the conflict and even in recent months, though the intended goal was always the Syrian government.

And suddenly the no-fly zone is happening — right where Turkey always wanted it — but it’s being labeled an “anti-ISIS” safe zone, instead of its proper name: “Anti Kurdish and anti-Syrian government” safe zone.

The U.S. media swallowed the name change without blinking, but many international media outlets knew better.

For instance, the International Business Times reported:

[the safe zone deal]…could mark the end of [Syrian President] Assad…

And The Middle East Eye reported:

…[the safe zone] marks a breakthrough for Turkey in its confrontation with the Bashar al-Assad government in Syria. If the no-fly zone does come into being it will be a body blow for Assad and his supporters

Even U.S. media outlets acknowledged that the primary goal of Obama’s safe zone ally, Turkey, was defeating the Kurdish fighters and the Syrian government, both of whom have been the most effective fighters against ISIS.

Syrian regime change is also the goal of the ground troops who will be filling the void left by ISIS, who The New York Times labeled “relatively moderate Syrian insurgents,” a telling euphemism.

The New York Times confirmed the goals of the safe zone allies:

…both the Turks and the Syrian insurgents see defeating President Bashar al-Assad of Syria as their first priority…

If the Syrian government wasn’t the target of the safe zone, then Syrian government troops would be the ones to control the safe zone post ISIS, as they did before ISIS. And if regime change wasn’t the target, then the Syrian government would have been consulted and coordinated with to attack ISIS, since Syria is involved with heavy fighting against ISIS in the same region that the safe zone is being carved out.

These steps weren’t taken because the “safe zone” plan is much bigger than ISIS.

Obama hasn’t detailed who the “relatively moderate” fighters are that will control the safe zone, but it’s easy to guess. We only have to look at the Syrian rebels on the ground who are effective fighters and control nearby territory.

The most powerful non-ISIS group in the region recently re-branded itself as the “Conquest Army,” a coalition of Islamic extremists led by Jabhat al-Nusra — the official al-Qaeda affiliate — and the group Ahrar al-Sham, whose leader previously stated that his group was “the real al Qaeda.” The Conquest Army actively coordinates with Turkey and Saudi Arabia, and is also populated with U.S.-trained fighters.

These groups share the ideology and tactics of ISIS, the only difference being their willingness to work with the United States and Turkey. It’s entirely likely that once the “safe zone” operation starts, many ISIS troops will simply change shirts and join Jabhat al-Nusra, since there is no principled difference.

Obama knows that the foreign ground troops controlling the “safe zone” are targeting the Syrian government; consequently, U.S. military planes will be acting as the de-facto air force for Al-Qaeda against the Syrian government.

Thus, direct military confrontation with the Syrian government is inevitable. President Assad is already attacking ISIS in the area that the U.S.-Turkey alliance wants to make “safe” via its coordinated military operation. Syrian fighter jets will eventually be targeted, since the goal is to allow extremist groups a “safe zone” to continue their attacks on the Syrian government after ISIS is dealt with.

This danger was also acknowledged by The New York Times:

Whatever the goal, the plan [safe zone] will put American and allied warplanes closer than ever to areas that Syrian aircraft regularly bomb, raising the question of what they will do if Syrian warplanes attack their partners [“relatively moderate rebels”] on the ground.

The answer is obvious: U.S. and Turkish fighter jets will engage with Syrian aircraft, broadening and deepening the war until the intended aim of regime change has been accomplished.

This is exactly how events developed in Libya, when the U.S.-NATO led a “no-fly zone” that was supposedly created to allow a “humanitarian corridor,” but quickly snowballed into its real goal: regime change and assassination of Libya’s president. This epic war crime is still celebrated by Obama and Hillary Clinton as a “victory,” while Libyans drown in the Mediterranean to escape their once-modern but now obliterated country.

If Obama’s goal in Syria was actually defeating ISIS, this could have been achieved at any time, in a matter of weeks. It would simply take a serious and coordinated effort with U.S. regional allies, while coordinating with the non-allies already fighting ISIS: Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah.

If Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Jordan were involved in the fight on ISIS it would be quickly strangled of cash, guns, and troops, and be massively out-powered. War over.

The only reason this hasn’t happened is that the U.S. and its allies have always viewed ISIS as a convenient proxy against Syria, Hezbollah, and Iran, not to mention leverage against the Iran-friendly government of Iraq.

Turkey remains the biggest obstacle to defeating ISIS, since it’s been helping it for years. ISIS has long used the Turkish border to escape Syrian government attacks, seek medical assistance, and get supplies and reinforcements. ISIS is so welcomed inside Turkey that ISIS promotes Turkey on social media as the international transit hub for jihadis wanting to join ISIS. Turkish immigration and customs looks the other way, as does the Turkish border control.

In discussing the “safe zone,” the U.S. media always ignore the concept of national sovereignty — the basis for international law. The boundaries of countries are sacred from the standpoint of international law. The only just war is a defensive one. When one country implements a no-fly zone in another country, national boundaries are violated and international law is broken by an act of war.

The Obama administration is aware of the above dynamics, but has again tossed caution to the wind as he did in 2013, during the ramp up to its aborted bombing campaign against the Syrian government.

A U.S.-Turkish no-fly zone will deepen an already regional war: Iran and Hezbollah have recently ramped up direct support of the Syrian government. As Turkish and the U.S. military enter the war space for the first time, confrontation is inevitable. Confrontation is the plan.


Shamus Cooke is a social service worker, trade unionist, and writer for Workers Action. He can be reached at portland@workerscompass.org

23 Comments

  1. Pingback: USA ničí Evropu ! – Nová republika

  2. Pingback: Today,s Thought

  3. Pingback: Les États-Unis détruisent l’Europe – à l’insu de leur plein gré ? | Arrêt sur Info

  4. Pingback: Österreich, tritt praktisch nicht mehr als Investor in Albanien auf: U.S. is Destroying Europe - AlbNews

  5. Pingback: Η αποσταθεροποίηση της Ευρώπης |

  6. Pingback: US-Historiker: Die USA zerstören Europa | otto – blog—meinungs-Freiheit

  7. Pingback: USA zerstören EUROPA….definitiv sehen ” FREUNDE ” anders aus,wer betreibt in EUROPA ein Verbrechen an den Völkern….??? | Egon Tech Blog

  8. Pingback: Web Research Links for the week of 8/10/15: «

  9. Pingback: TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE » U.S. Is Destroying Europe

  10. Pingback: From creating a refugee crisis in Libya and Syria, to starting a war in Ukraine, is the US trying to destroy Europe? - Red Pill Times

  11. Pingback: U.S. is Destroying Europe | Global Geopolitics

  12. Pingback: U.S. is Destroying Europe « Socio-Economics History Blog

  13. Pingback: U.S.A is Destroying Europe | Gawronski Rafzen's Blog

  14. Pingback: U.S. is Destroying Europe / Eric ZUESSE / 07.08.2015 | Today,s Thought

  15. Pingback: The U.S. Is Destroying Europe | JPPress

  16. Pingback: Today’s News August 8, 2015 | Fiat Planet

  17. Pingback: The U.S. Is Destroying Europe | Infinite Log

  18. Pingback: The U.S. Is Destroying Europe | QuestorSystems.com

  19. Pingback: U.S. is Destroying Europe - The True News

  20. Pingback: The U.S. Is Destroying Europe

  21. Pingback: USA policies are causing millions of refugees and Europe is expected to pick up the tab | Uprootedpalestinians's Blog

  22. Guest says

    Again Turkey. Supporting terrorism in China in Crimea and Syria.
    What is it they hope to gain. They are so keen to get rid of Assad for what reason?

    This no fly zone will escalate the war but getting rid of Assad does not mean “victory” it means another Libya, chaos, extremism, more refugees,

    Like

    • Guest says

      Isn’t “chaos, extremism, more refugees,” just part of “Plan Yinon”?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s