17

Meet Lee Harvey Oswald, Sheep-Dipped Patsy

As part of our short season marking the anniversary of JFK’s assassination, we present this episode of the Corbett Report. A detailed run-down of the life of Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin and original “lone nut”. For a transcript, links to sources, or to download the video, click here.

SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN

If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

17 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Schlüter
Schlüter
Dec 2, 2016 8:39 PM

See also:
„Assassination of JFK: Half a Century of Lies“, http://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2013/11/22/assassination-of-jfk-half-a-century-of-lies/ & “Mary´s Mosaic”, Looking into an Abyss, Part II: http://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/12/17/marys-mosaic-looking-into-an-abyss-part-ii/

Arrby
Arrby
Nov 23, 2016 7:35 PM

The “violent backward motion” over and over again. Yes, His head and body would jerk a little. But, What exactly are we looking at? They certainly want us to believe we see what they say we see, Don’t they?

rtj1211
rtj1211
Nov 23, 2016 12:42 PM

The first concrete demonstration to the world that power in the US is vested not in the President but in unelected, unaccountable men who will murder the elected leader if they do not do their bidding.

Ross Hendry
Ross Hendry
Nov 24, 2016 11:09 AM
Reply to  rtj1211

And to do so in broad daylight, with a TV audience of millions able to see the killing shots, suggests a conscious desire for strong theatre that will send the message to future leaders (and the world ) that there are forces higher than the puppets in government who will always get what they want.

BigB
BigB
Nov 23, 2016 12:31 PM

I cannot add anything about the crime – but I do have some insight on the cover up. Cui bono? According to Peter Dale Scott – the real force behind the Commission was not Chief Justice Warren (who was still an active SCOTUS judge) – but Allen Dulles. That means that the recently sacked Director of the CIA – the very agency implicated in the crime – investigated the crime. As Phillip Zelikow would do later – the Commission was directed a posteriori form the conclusion to the fact (already determined by Dulles) that LHO was a ‘loner’, ‘without confederates.’ Another man who should have been a suspect – not an investigator – was Lyman Lemnitzer. He is best known today as the man responsible for the Northwoods document – the one we all point to and say “look, false flags are real.” Like Dulles – he held JFK in… Read more »

John
John
Nov 23, 2016 11:13 AM

I find it hard to make out what Oswald is saying when answering reporters’ questions. He admits he worked in the Book Depository building but much of the rest of his comments are hard to follow. Can anyone else tell me what they think he is saying in the footage? Where the plotters were very clever was in distracting attention towards the grassy knoll. In doing so, they diverted attention away from the culvert underneath the grassy knoll where the fatal shooter was located. If the shooter had been on the grassy knoll, JFK’s head would have moved DOWN and to the right after the bullet struck his head. Instead – as we can all see from the Zapruder footage – his head moved back, UP and to the left, thereby demonstrating that the trajectory of the fatal bullet came from JFK’s right and at lower street level – not… Read more »

zorro
zorro
Jun 29, 2017 2:41 AM
Reply to  John

Grassy noll or culvert, the shot came from Kennedy’s right and hit him on the front.
As the official theory maintained that no shots were fired from the front, but only from the back and from the school depository, the backward motion of Kennedy’s head proved them wrong.
As for Oswald, he could clearly be heard saying, “I am only a patsy”, just before his death at the hands of Ruby. He said it ALL in a single sentence!

bill
bill
Nov 23, 2016 10:44 AM

Angleton had chosen LHO as one of the patsies for one or any of the plots at least a year, more like 2-3, before Dallas which was only necessary as Chicago and Miami had failed and was part of the reason he and his new Russian wife were so easily allowed (back) into the USA when anyone else would have been arrested and charged with treason esp after his outbursts to the US ambassador and specialist radar knowledge esp in the light of the U-2/Powers controversy which undermined Eisenhowers attempted detente( He was there under the ONI/CIA False Defector Programme,entering through the known spy route from Helsinki where this impoverished roustabout had stayed at the very best hotels)The sheepdipping as a pro-Castro supporter uncovered by Garrison was orchestrated in situ by David Atlee Phillips ( confirmed as Bishop by Veciana following Fonzis death) which was also for some of the… Read more »

Greg Bacon
Greg Bacon
Nov 23, 2016 9:35 AM

America, welcome to tyranny. The first part of our coup d’etat was back in 1913, when the private bankers took control of our economy with their phony Federal Reserve, which is NOT federal and has NO reserve, except massive supplies of thin air, which they use to issue our debt-based currency. The bookend to the first coup d’etat was on 9/11.
But don’t think about slavery, like Bush the Younger said after 9/11, don’t worry, go out and shop!
In a way, the USA is back to the Founding Fathers original intent, where only wealthy, white land owners have the power.

Brian Harry, Australia
Brian Harry, Australia
Nov 23, 2016 5:05 AM

There is a stark similarity between the ‘conspiracy’ to kill JFK, and the ‘demolition of the Twin Towers(and five or six other buildings, which rarely get a mention) on “9/11”, And that is, both events were televised, and turned into ‘infotainment’ which gained maximum coverage for propaganda purposes. Everyone on Earth can remember where they were when JFK died and when 9/11 happened. JFK’s assassination received even more dramatic(televised) national coverage later, when Jacob Rubenstein(Jack Ruby) was shown live on National television assassinating Oswald in cold blood(rather conveniently ensuing no need to go to trial for Oswald). Rubenstein also ‘conveniently’, died of a medical problem soon after. Of course, the cover ups that followed the events, both of which do NOT stand up to any real scrutiny, were immediately accepted as ‘Case Closed’, with the government refusing to have ‘independent’ investigations into both matters. It’s almost as if the Government… Read more »

zorro
zorro
Jun 29, 2017 3:09 AM

You substitute “Bin Laden” for “Oswald”, and the similarity between “9/11” and “Kennedy” is complete. Both were ex-CIA assets, and both were falsely accused of a crime they BOTH denied! “Oswald” died at the hands of Ruby, linked to the corrupt Dallas police. Bin Laden died of kidney failure early 2002. He was kept “alive” on purpose by the CIA for many years, played out in “Bin Laden” video shows, featuring Bin laden clones, not even remotely resembling the original, until the US called them off. On may 2011, Obama-the-lier and noble-prized war criminal, announced that Bin laden was “killed” by the SEAL unit in Pakistan, and the video shows were over. Some unfortunate Bin Laden clone was probably killed that day, to make it look real. But the body of “Bin Laden” was quickly disposed of at sea, in fear of a DNA test which could have proved to… Read more »

Aaron
Aaron
Nov 23, 2016 4:48 AM

The US administration has already admitted that one of the bullets from JFK’s body was from their own security, so it’s not possible for Oswald to have been working alone.
He may have been employed as a shooter with the intention of making him a patsy, or just be a plain patsy without any involvement in the assassination. Either way, there was more than one actor in the event where JFK died.

Brian Harry, Australia
Brian Harry, Australia
Nov 23, 2016 5:38 AM
Reply to  Aaron

Of course. JFK was hit from the back, and then, from the front, so Oswald wasn’t the only shooter(and probably had nothing at all to do with it).

Arrby
Arrby
Nov 23, 2016 7:23 PM

Keep in mind that he was wearing a neck to talbone brace when he was shot. He hurt his back, lol, when he overreached at a party, literally, for a woman he had his eye on. Which means that the lack of or limited (I’m not exactly sure how different assassination theorists tied that behavior into their theories, but it does get tied in) head whipping some noted in the Zapruder film was explicable.

Arrby
Arrby
Nov 23, 2016 7:27 PM
Reply to  Arrby

Note: The neck brace info is from Seymour Hersh’s “The Dark Side Of Camelot.”

John
John
Nov 23, 2016 11:18 AM
Reply to  Aaron

Can you provide an authoritative source for your statement ‘that one of the bullets from JFK’s body was from their own security.’?

Arrby
Arrby
Nov 23, 2016 7:25 PM
Reply to  John

No kiddding eh? I would never toss stuff like that out without something, a link, an author’s name, what have you. Mabye our commenter is new at this. We all had to learn netiquette.