ANALYSIS: Signs of Compromise in Yulia Skripal's Statement

Fully agreed MM: as evidenced in the moment Thatcher sold off the greatest UK / BT asset ever to all comer Corporations >> FIBRE OPTIC cable , the ultimate scientific advantage for societal intellectual development , not delivered to the UK people >>
WASTED !
She was either criminally complicit with the masters of ZION or just plain simple, an exceedingly dumb daughter of a cornered grocer’s shop owner ..

Hello Kaiama and thanks for your comment.
I agree that this information appears to be, as you suggest, far-fetched, bizarre, mad, call it what you will.
As with anything new, like for example, a book one has not yet read, new information will often provoke all kinds of reactions in people and while it is reasonable, indeed preferable to not be persuaded of anything in the first instance without studying it, likewise, imho, I do not consider it reasonable to write something off in the first instance either and certainly not reasonable to do so by dismissing volumes of evidence without explaining why.
It is akin to judging the book by it’s cover, which, imho, might not be the best rationale to assess anything.
Presently, the audience here have only been introduced to the first paragraph of the preface to that book and have not yet begun to read the myriad pages that follow, which contain numerous, identical examples of how the perps construct their “narratives” and schedule their “events”.
Also, imho, it is reasonable to expect anyone who might dismiss such evidence to have a sound basis for doing so and be willing to present those counter arguments for critique.
Rejection of evidence based on nothing more than feelings, intuition, or thoughts and reasoning not yet expressed, is also not the best approach to anything.
I suggest it is incumbent on those who may dismiss such information to at least begin to think about the issue under discussion, that being, the method by which the perps weave their faux narratives and schedule their events.
To date, after many years work on this, with hundreds of examples already posted on the web, I have yet to read any alternative explanation for what their method might be.
Nobody has ever offered any alternative hypothesis for how these faux narratives are constructed.
So what say you Kaiama ? Anyone ?
How are these narratives constructed and more specifically, what is the rationale for including often apparently “minor” ancillary false events in the mix ?
Do the desk officers in the puzzle palaces, just dream up stuff out of thin air, with no design rationale or imperative ?
Are false narrative nodes just randomly inserted into the mix of real facts and events with neither rhyme nor reason for their inclusion ?
Or are there design principles and therefore a methodology at work ?
Here is an important, self-evident, fact of life which I have discovered to my astonishment, most folk overlook and which I hope will help to frame any thinking on this subject.
A narrative Node X states that Event X is reported to have happened on Date X.
If we subsequently discover that narrative Node X is false, because for example, Event X could not and therefore did not happen, for whatever reason, then everyone needs to understand that not only is Event X false, but also it’s date attribute, Date X is false too.
If something is reported to have happened, did not in fact happen, then the date is it said to have happened on is also a lie too.
I trust that is a self-evident fact of life ?
So, all that remains in that scenario when analysing Node X, is to work out :
1. Why the false Event X was invented and included in the narrative in the first place and then
2. Why did the scriptwriters choose the false Date X for the false Event X ?
Why did they claim that, the now known to be false Event X, happened on Date X and not some other date ?
Are the dates assigned to known false events selected at random do you think ?
Research proves otherwise. Research proves over and over again that there is a method to the madness. It is systematic, reproducible and will be forever evident until the end of time, unless they change the calendar again.
The method relies on the simple science of mathematics using simple date arithmetic. So there is nothing new or “flaky” about the technique whatsoever.
On the contrary, I suggest that the only “flaky” part in this paradigm, is the understandable lack of awareness about the interpretation of these narratives and an understanding of their design method.
For example, when one reads in the Skripal script about “the spy with the Louis Vuitton handbag”, how is the information processed and interpreted ?
I’d say, at best, it is written off as a media joke and then ignored and more often, not even considered at all.
So, on that basis, imho, there seems little point in the scriptwriters including the meme at all.
This then leads to the next crucial part to understand.
If 99% of the audience are unable or unwilling to interpret and understand the meme, why do they include it in the narrative and who is the intended audience if not us ?
This “language of the oligarchs” or “twilight language” as some have called it, I suspect, is a method shared by all intel agencies.
If faction A is the real perpetrator and faction B is the intended target, then I suggest that faction B do know how to interpret these allegories and this language because they use the very same method.
As I have posted here before. the narratives always point to the “complaints” which comprise the motivation for the event and also always point to those responsible.
It is these kabbalistic facts of life which are correctly interpreted by agencies of the target faction and so they well know who is really doing what to whom and why.
We, the proles are not to be told the truth of course. We are persuaded that it is the enemy du jour who is always responsible.
For example, do folk think that our government would come out and tell us that it was Tel Aviv, or Washington or Riyadh who blew up the trains and not “home grown Islamic terrorists” ?
I think not.
The frequently but not exclusively self-inflicted smokescreen of “the government did it”, is often misdirection and incorrect. This will prevent any and all from seeing the wood from the trees.
Once that preconceived, debilitating obstacle is overcome in favour of the preferred open, analytical approach, then the various factions can be seen to be at work, along with their reasons and those responsible.
The only way to do that is to learn to interpret their language.
If we do not learn that language, then all that remains is the familiar “grammar analysis”, which is crucial of course, but I aver is of only limited value in narrative analysis. It may satisfy some to varying degrees, but is rarely conclusive. These pages attest to the numerous “opinions” that exercise provokes. Rarely is anything conclusively proved or even argued imho.
When one also considers that this “grammar analysis” completely ignores narrative nodes about which it is ill-equipped to analyse, such as the “the spy with the Louis Vuitton handbag” for example, it therefore becomes self-evident that “grammar analysis” on it’s own is a wholly inadequate method with which to study narratives.
No respected analytical discipline that I know of, cherry-picks the bits it wants to comment on while ignoring others that it just does not know what to do with.
Studying the kabbalistic event relationships overcomes this flawed approach. Always.
I aver, that is the way the narratives are created / written / constructed and therefore that is the way they should be decoded.
There is abundant, overwhelming evidence for this.
Re: the FIFA World Cup dates and Israel’s birthday.
We must all be aware that relationships such as 666m, w & d between events exist naturally.
I do not know about how the FIFA event is scheduled and who does that scheduling and why it is scheduled thus. ( I would be interested to know about this though. )
The fact remains that there is a 666m, w & d relationship to the first couple of days of the 2018 FIFA World Cup.
There is nothing anyone can do about this kabbalistic fact of life.
Whether the FIFA scheduling with respect to that relationship is intentional or not, I do not know. My post did not intend to convey any notion of intent or even design in this instance.
Whether this quintessential kabbalism will be used for some nefarious event, I don’t know.
It may be and it may be FIFA World Cup related, or not, I don’t know, because I do not have a crystal ball.
Although I never make predictions publicly, I made this exception because I do consider it worth posting, because it exists and because of this antecedent :
ISIS Syria : Omran Daqneesh : The Aleppo “dusty boy” psyop : Israel’s birthday
https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?p=1062875231#post1062875231
*
One last thing :
The Trivium Method requires that we study logic, grammar and rhetoric.
This should equate to resolving the who, what, why, where and when of any narrative or event.
Attempts are made through “grammar analysis” to analyse the who, what, why, and where but never their neglected sibling, the “when”.
Why do you think that is the case ?
It baffles me. But there seems to be very little focus, if any on this crucial part of the analysis.
My work fills that gap and I aver, is the only way that a full understanding of these diabolical narratives can be achieved.
As an aside, I also suggest that the WMD meme, is itself an allegorical joke, since the only place we are going to find the elusive WMD is among the Weeks, Months and Days of the event relationships.
If anyone has any questions then I will do my best to answer them.
MG

Neil, math & science was never one of your strengths .. nor thinking ‘futures’.
Try and focus on the real mental midgets in these threads, that deserve a good squatting with your demon wit, (that can backfire in your sometimes rash impulsivity, shooting yourself in the foot in advance ?): best leave untouched, what you don’t understand yet.. because it could harm your self respect in the long game, after you take time to consider..
Schrödingers Cat ?
and d’fact that Dr. Seuss’ s Cat in the Hat is back ..
We all make mistakes: best not amplify them, eh ?
How about after the World Cup, if you insist upon getting even ?
Lol, this comment is logged and Marks too, so we’ll see soon enough whose foot & mouth rests in the pooh scat from d’Tiggerszzzz .. in bear markets.
I personally am very grateful for the comments from Mark , for extremely complex reasons,
you cannot grasp .. yet
Let it be 😉
just for now .. show some patience & common respect for others opinions.
I have predicted just about every major ‘hit’ correctly since the mid 80’s onwards , especially financial, way better than Trump already in ’92’ (also on record at the Guardian predicting his win in 2016 , way in advance) , after doing my own research first and gone on record, one way or another: it takes courage to stick one’s neck out in advance, above the “barbarous multitudes” with all the paid trolls & polls, from the lobbyists of Zion ..
& their faux estimations, for whom the bell tolls .. !

Hello Tony M
Wow. As I said, new information provokes all kinds of reactions in people.
I normally thank folk for commenting costructively, peaceably and politely to my posts, but since yours is a tad abusive, I will refrain this time.
Are you able and willing to elucidate please vis your chracterisation :
“occult/numerology nonsense, it’s just silly, deranged”
You also have the option of apologising for being so rude, if and when you feel like it…
Why don’t you explain to the world what it is that’s bothering you about the information in my posts ?
While you’re at it, perhaps you could also explain why it provokes such a temper in you and why it compels you to make such ignorant and breathless conclusions ?
Or is it just going to remain as unfounded, a priori, ill-informed abuse ?
Your rant sounds very much like the control freaks who used to “manage” the “9/11 truth campaign” who screamed the excat same mantra whenever any poster went “off messsage”
“Stop this nonsense, you are bringing the 9/11 truth movement into disrepute.”
Your call Tony H
MG