Amazon Censorship of 9/11 Unmasked?

Others have and do consciously or unconsciously co-create structures of meaning for their own reasons – real or imagined, and collectively assert and enforce such meanings as actions and rules that govern actions. Insofar as we give meaning to the world, we suffer it to be true and live it as the world.

Each of us is effectively already participating in such agreements, definitions, rule-bound thinking – by virtue of our social existence, acculturation and conditioning – some of which is consciously passed on but much of which is unconscious to the personal, social and human persona. The unseen role of denial is part of collective rule or agreement to look away from both the denied and the act of denial so as ‘not to know the thing we do’ and to reframe what we do in a complex defence of partitioned thought whose story asserts a cover for an un-named dread, terror or hate, that finds innumerable ‘names’ in the world by way of a masked displacement, diversion and sacrificial rite by which another pays that I and mine might live.

The maintaining of the state of defence against truth – is the determining OF truth – which is backwards to the truth of which we Are the unfolding and sharing in as expressions of Life. The conflict of a denied and feared Nature with an overriding ‘mind control’ of ruled thought set as if apart from and over self, life and other, is the nature of ‘attack on Reality’. The belief that we CAN and HAVE such power is the conviction in and the re-enacting OF an UN-reality – given power and suffered even to murder, torture and death.

The nature of the reversal is hidden to the attempt to fit or adapt under an impossible dilemma. Every kind of strategy is played out and shifted between or contrasted against so as to reframe the core and common dilemma in terms of sacrificing or being delivered up for sacrifice, victimising or suffering persecution, under ever shifting relations set by power – as the world seeks it, which is invoked and worshipped and sacrificed to as the protection from the fear of… pain and loss of one’s life and its loves – be they private fantasy substitution for love or partial and conditional facets of the Nature of being that extend or give and receive, rather than merely get.

To the surface thinking of the mind in the world, the unthinkable will remain unseen, or momentarily felt as the urge to ESCAPE IT, find something else to need to do or notice. The split mind is predicated to defend against knowing what it cannot bear to own – and so will always seem to know something else in a shifting pattern of evasion within which to seek and find narrative identity or indeed narrative continuity – as psychic survival of the self-invested personality structure.

The mind is split – not in truth, but in concept, as conscious and unconscious – where the unconscious is the inhibition of distorted or perverted physical impulse AND of the projected guilt of such distortion upon the inhibition of love that is Natural Communication or recognition in Spirit.

The level of experience that is of the personification of guilt is its hiding – and thus mitigation, delay or escape of penalty, in ‘private minds’ and re-distribution according to alignments and alliances in ideas sought for and fuelled by a negatively defined sense of self, life and other – that run as a blame-game economy or ‘war against’ perceived and believed evils.

The mind of guilt operates the denial of truly awakened conscious responsibility – unless of course its denial-matrix is itself brought to light, to awareness, and re-evalution in a willingness of true communication or dis-inhibition of the movement of being that knows itself love by the giving.

No one can ‘repent’ of or release what they have not owned in themself, and no one will ‘own’ to that which they believe would damn or condemn them – and so they MUST seek to deny in OTHERS to ‘save’ the self that denied guilt and fear ‘gives’ them and by which they find temporary security. A state which is a dilemma by definition but one in which a mind can learn to align in a true willingness for learning to make better choices as a result of growing awareness in conscious recognition and sharing in self-honesty and trust as a true expression of their being that brings a true appreciation and perception of others and world. For nothing is as we think.

But as we think so do we perceive, and as we perceive so shall we react or respond.
The invoking of Law as protection for freedom from coercion aligns toward the law of love – which is giving and receiving as one. The mind used for ‘getting’ is an intent to GET at expense of wholeness, and then GIVE to get rid of or push out the rejected – and defend the separative identity as if a ‘whole’ set against threat of the unloving.

The balancing act of an insane mind is of ensuring balance is never allowed, because a true account would lose all support or allegiance in a demonstrably false. And so the lie is felt as ‘survival necessity’ – and yet protected or kept hidden from the surface or mass mind because its disclosure would bring on psychotic chaos – or the reliving of an original conflict that was NEVER to be allowed consciousness.

Never can be a very long time. But time can also serve a change of perspective, such that outcomes set in rage or terror become recognisable in their fruits and the fruits lose all savour or meaning. Those who find they are no longer willing to pay cost of the real world in exchange for a false, open to a re-educational and reintegrative movement of being – because when the false is NOT fed and maintained, true is revealed to the willingness of its acceptance. Truth is never hidden but by the attempt to hide in something else – in which we are expert.

I’m with the 100% one step at a time or rather as a growing willingness that opens to fresh perspective.
The shift in conscious purpose has an apparent cost in no longer being unaware of the negative emotional participations of self that of course are correspondent to the world at large. Or to put in another way, that which was unconscious becomes a conscious responsibility rather than a dump on world, others, body or self-judgement. This could be seen as all our judgements coming home – but that is not the purpose or the core of the experience of aligning in joy and addressing the evils of the day thereof. But until we are stronger or more consciously unified in purpose, we are ‘skinless’, naked or exposed to experience beyond our comfort zone or control – and needs must release the illusion of control for a true realignment that gives balance in wholeness of being, as a replacement for the attempt to manually ‘equalise’ a sense of self-lack, deprivation or denial.

That I can sketch all this in terms that may be discernible is no substitute for living the transformation of consciousness experientially. And regardless of anyone’s intellectual abilities or development, the innate wisdom of being operates within the communication OF embraced experience, and so the understandings in truth are wordless knowing that cannot be systemised, weaponised or made possession of, but we can live in the light of who and what life reveals us to be, when we are open to let light in. A false light is set against darkness, as judgement of good sets against evil, but the true dispels or undoes the false and shines on all equally.

How any of this relates to a world of hate, murder and sacrifice in ‘secret’, is not a plan for the secret mind to conceive or believe. It is not ‘punished’ except by its own act of Self-exclusion while it persists in the act or the wish to be ‘special’ or ‘more than’. Of course even these ideas can be realigned to serve wholeness rather than set apart. But the mind that set the mis-identification is not the means of its own undoing – excepting its outcome is the futility or meaninglessness in which its release allows the re-cognition of being from a true foundation – which is not what we expect.

My deepest appreciations of the Mosaic Commandments is that you CANNOT in truth break them but you break your own awareness of wholeness of being to a world of imaged usurpation, exclusive identity, lack and lust after ‘external’ attempts to self-validate, and the shadow of your transgressions upon your heart in guilts that seek the lie as the only power of protection.

But the two commandments made famous by Jesus were positive affirmations of truth in being – that aligning under reveals true. The breakdown of communication between our mind and our Source nature IS the expression of a breakdown in ‘Family’, of our relational co-creative being. In negative creation we believe that what we have made has made us because we project CAUSE outside our self – in fear of reliving ‘separation trauma’.

A phishing ruse present an attack or threat of attack in such a frame as to elicit immediate reaction that then frames the mind OF reaction to have accepted its terms – which of course are hidden by the nature of the ruse. That un watched mind can elicit such a confusion of its own split focus is evident and often taken as evidence that there is no truth but for those who claim the power to make it. Which is persisting in the nature of the deceit rather than its undoing.

Every thought accepted by living as true is a ‘vote’ for persisting in a deceit or its undoing to true willingness. Insofar as we notice, and abide in noticing, we have opened choice in place of ‘habit-reality’ and by moving or acting from the awareness thus accepted, we share that ‘vote’ and strengthen it.
To notice and immediately recoil to blame or judgement is to have hardly flickered our eyelids – and yet that is the spark that needs be attended if it is to grow.

Who can reach to the light in other minds that still hides from or denies the light in their own by the attempt to change others by force or guile of manipulative appeal?

But unless your light shines, you will not know you have it – and that it is you.
This is VERY different from the teaching of a society in guilt, secrets and lies.
And is received not in the ‘thinking’ of the mind but in the heart – when the mind steps aside to listen.

The idea of responsibility is the law of cause and affect that is the nature to all experience but the idea of vengeance upon the blameworthy is a projection of our own mis-taken or usurped function of ‘judge’ over the living. The discernment of the false from the true is of wisdom that steps back to look and listen within. I cannot make your vote for you or deprive you of it, but I can remind you that whatever you choose will embody the meaning you are accepting and choosing to give.

The world is not the framing of choice but of choices that go nowhere. But the real world is all the love we give it – and this is a choiceless choice ultimately because this is our true nature – but notice how attached, invested and defended we are in ‘loving to hate’. And perhaps in hating or fearing to love – as the willingness to recognize and give acknowledgement in like kind – instead of arresting in judgements of appearance and presentation.

Every form can be used to mask in. But any form can be unmasked to reveal more of who we truly are – even if VIA the revealing of who we truly are NOT.