26

A Do Nothing Anti-Labor Day: A Modest Proposal

Edward Curtin

In a country with a Mount Rushmore that celebrates the ruthless and frenetic westward expansion, it might be a bit naïve to suggest a Do Nothing Day. I have nothing against laboring men and women having their day. I am a laborer myself, and national holidays are great – so many sales for stuff no one needs, and far too many people working on an ostensible holiday. But I have this ridiculous dream of a day when everyone just does nothing.

To rush less, to idle, and to do nothing sounds so un-American, yet it might be a solution to many of our country’s problems.

Quixotic as it may sound, if every person in the country could be convinced to lay aside his compulsive busyness for one day per month, for starters, this not-doing would paradoxically accomplish so much.

Nothing is a funny word, as Shakespeare well knew. There is so much to it; “much ado” as he put it. It is the great motivator. While it frightens people, it is also the spur to creativity.

Samuel Beckett once astutely said, “Nothing is more real than nothing.” It is the void, the womb, the empty space out of which we come and live out our days. It is the background silence for all our noise. Like the rain, it is purely gratuitous. Such a gift should not be shunned.

By doing nothing I mean the following: no work, just free play; no travel, except by foot or bicycle; no use of technology of any sort except stoves for cooking meals to share; no household repairs or projects; no buying or selling of any kind, including thinking of buying and selling. You get the point.

This not-doing doing could be called dreaming or simply being. It’s a tough task indeed, but fitting for the paradoxical creatures that we are. And that’s just for individuals.

Nationally, all businesses would be closed, factories would be idled, planes and trains grounded. Only emergency services – hospitals, police, etc. would be allowed to operate. Quixotic, yes, but our national leaders, Republicans and Democrats alike, are surely apt to agree since it would add one more day to their monthly schedules of doing “nothing.”

Making my point in a slightly different way, Mark Twain said, “Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.”

Think of how much we would accomplish by doing nothing! People might dream and think; they might hear birds singing or even sing themselves; they might have real conversations; they might feel the peace of a wild idleness; our ecological matrix would have a brief chance to catch its breath; a massive amount of energy would be saved and little carbon would be spewed into the atmosphere (a rather startling statistic could be inserted here). The benefits are endless – and all from doing nothing.

The immediate downside would be millions of mental breakdowns of the do-something addicts. Their agony from trying to do nothing would be excruciating. A friend from another country where they still take siestas and celebrate doing nothing was kind enough to suggest a rapid resolution to this mass madness. Kill these do-somethings.

Since they are not good for nothing while alive, she said, and can’t help contaminating the earth with their compulsive busyness, why keep them around. She advocated enlisting the help of the Pentagon for this work since killing is their business and they are good at it.

While acknowledging the aptness of her suggestion, I told her I thought the Pentagon was much too busy killing foreigners to get involved in a domestic caper at this time. It also raises a number of other practical problems, the biggest being how and where to bury so many busybodies all at once.

Furthermore, people who have so utterly forgotten their childhood’s lovely ability to do nothing are far too old and tough and set in their skins to be used as food, as another wag of my acquaintance suggested. Even trying a little tenderizer on their frazzled flesh wouldn’t work.

After all, when Jonathan Swift had that profound idea of how to solve the Irish famine problem, he was suggesting soft and tender one-year-olds be slaughtered and sold to the wealthy since they would make “delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled.” But older, compulsive, do-something people, set in their ways, while seemingly organic – a good thing these days – are tough and sinewy – a not very appetizing thought. I doubt there would be much demand for their meat.

Therefore, in all due respect, let me suggest another way to proceed. I think it best to let them go mad on Do Nothing Days. They will bounce back on the intervening go-go days but should eventually get so discouraged by having to stop once a month that they will do us the favor of committing suicide.

That way they’ll get what they didn’t want – a quite long stretch of days doing nothing, if eternity has days.

And the survivors can live guilt-free, since all they did was nothing to stop them.

As you can see, the downsides to Do Nothing Days are small compared to the benefits. But convincing people to adopt my plan won’t be easy. Long ago I stopped giving advice to friends and family since whatever I suggested seemed to encourage them to do the opposite. Yet here I go again, suggesting this big Do Nothing Day. So I will desist in the name of the law of reversed effort.

I really don’t want to organize a movement to establish particular days for this not-doing. I don’t want to establish a cult and be a cult leader. I’m really too busy for that. My schedule is too packed for such a job. Maybe you have time. I have too much to do.

I say, “Nothing doing.”

I was once rushing to take groceries to my elderly mother when I ran into the sharp metal edge of a stop sign. Stunned and coming to on my back on the pavement with blood dripping down my face, it bemused me to think how fast I was stopped. Ever since, I’ve been on the go, laboring away.

Nothing showed me his face.

Yet here and there I have this dream of a Do Nothing Day. It’s the dream of a ridiculous man, isn’t it?

SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN

If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

26 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Toby Russell
Toby Russell
Sep 3, 2019 2:39 PM

This reminds of another article that made a big impression on me a few years back: The Abolition of Work by Bob Black. A choice quote:

Liberals say we should end employment discrimination. I say we should end employment. Conservatives support right-to-work laws. Following Karl Marx’s wayward son-in-law Paul Lafargue I support the right to be lazy. Leftists favor full employment. Like the surrealists – except that I’m not kidding – I favor full *un*employment. Trotskyists agitate for permanent revolution. I agitate for permanent revelry.

Tim Jenkins
Tim Jenkins
Sep 3, 2019 11:01 AM

Imagine, if our national security states did abso’FUKUS’lutely nothing . . .

then we could open source all intelligence, science & engineering, in real time . . .

& Firkin’ GROWSOME ! great balls of fire for pro-Vision for our kids.

Fair dinkum
Fair dinkum
Sep 2, 2019 11:54 PM
MLS
MLS
Sep 2, 2019 10:01 PM

This is genuinely brilliant writing!

(and I’m not Ed’s mum)

nottheonly1
nottheonly1
Sep 2, 2019 8:31 PM

You may have similar memories of your own past, when you were much younger.
There is a word in Northern German folk tradition. It is called ‘klütern’. Klütern is
doing nothing specific, but everything that needs to be done is done. Wu Wei.
So I was doing nothing specific in my room, when my Mom would enter and ask
me: “What are you doing?” To which I would of course respond with “Nothing.”
That would aggravate her, as she would say “You cannot not do something. You
are doing something. What are you doing?” “Nothing, Mom. I am doing nothing.”
She would often reply – depending on her mood – “I’m going to tell your father
about it when he comes home from work.”

BigB
BigB
Sep 2, 2019 6:41 PM

We, as a civilisational society, need to embrace doing nothing – as per Ed’s description – do nothing: permanently. Otherwise we will end up doing nothing permanently: as a post-society civilisation. In Capitalist Realism: we are conditioned by work. What we are is inextricably linked to what we do. What we do: we do for money …which is its own secondary reinforcement schedule defining us according to merit and skill. Self-esteem and wellbeing are bought and sold as a symbolic commodity exchange. We consume time to buy time. Our time. Leisure time. Meaningful time exchanged for …well, it depends on levels of conformism and hard work, with an element of luck. Such as geographic luck in being born into a developed society. If you are born in Darfur or Al Hudaydah (Yemen) …then no amount of anything can be exchanged for meaningful time or purposeful doing nothing. So, doing nothing… Read more »

Chris Rogers
Chris Rogers
Sep 2, 2019 7:14 PM
Reply to  BigB

BigB, being old enough to live through Edward Heath’s three day week, with regular brown outs – we had loads of candles for light, its funny how the UK managed to survive and life went on. Fast forward a generation to the offspring of the Thatcher/Reagan years, and we have massive underemployment/unemployment across much of the developed World, whilst many in the FIRE Economy languish within their terrible offices working 100 hours and more each week in the hope that at 35 – 40 they can retire as millionaires, alas, even with their millions, some but can’t resist from working within the FIRE economy, generating massive paper/digital wealth, whilst the majority living around them exist on meagre incomes. So, much has changed, some individuals just can’t stop working, whilst others are denied any work whatsoever – it was never this way in the Nineteenth Century, where many made enough to… Read more »

BigB
BigB
Sep 2, 2019 8:29 PM
Reply to  Chris Rogers

Chris: That must be a young photo: that puts you at my age as they were my formative memories …sitting in the candlelit dark. Then the ‘Big Bang’. There was an opportunity missed to re-adjust our expectations to a more bio-physically affordable way of life – re E F Schumacher’s ‘Small is Beautiful’. Instead of the affordable ‘do nothing’: we chose ‘be something or someone’ via the insane FIRE of capitalist largesse. According tot he standard textbook psychology of say, Jordan Peterson: the moment is “unbearable”. So we create plans and strategies to make the moment appreciable when we ‘get where we want to be’; or we ‘make it’. It’s the classic Trotterism: “this time next year we’ll be millionaires”. Then what: if the impelling psychological drive is the unbearableness of the moment? Another million. And another. You must know of Nate Hagens? He was a trader and this is… Read more »

Chris Rogers
Chris Rogers
Sep 2, 2019 8:54 PM
Reply to  BigB

BigB, That photo was taken in 2012 for a trade journal article written about me and my business experience in Asia at the time of the GFC, believe it or not, the photo was taken on my balcony and I had no trousers on, it was just a head and collar job – trust me, I’ve loads of grey hair now I’m afraid, but nice to have a professional photo on hand, it being the only one I have. On a serious note, I do despair at it all, given the wealth of evidence we have, I despair at the Green Party and its sole focus on the EU and Brexit, I despair at our elected politicians pushing the perpetual GDP growth mantra, and the utopians talking about Techno Communism for the masses. By the way, your input on the Global Warming article a few months ago was pure brilliance,… Read more »

MLS
MLS
Sep 2, 2019 9:57 PM
Reply to  Chris Rogers

My recollection of BigB’s contribution to the global warming debate was

1) not understanding the science and getting his bottom handed to him by a couple of people who did

2) waffling on in incomprehensibly pompous prose to try and disguise the above

3) strenuously denying what he now claims to have always said – viz that climate change is being exploited by corporations and caution must be applied.

He actually attacked me directly for making that very point so it’s quite naughty of him to now claim the opposite.

He’s a bit of a blowhard but a nice enough guy, and I agree with him about many things, but before today I’d have said only his mum would describe his meandering global warming contributions as ‘brilliant’

Assuming you’re not his mum, what was it about his contribution you felt the need to share far and wide?

Genuinely curious. 🤔

Chris Rogers
Chris Rogers
Sep 2, 2019 10:18 PM
Reply to  MLS

I enjoyed his contribution, actually, I enjoyed most contributors input as it was a rather heated debate – there’s lots of actual science to back up multiple cases, participating is the important thing, as well as caring – which is why i shared it around a bit and ask people to read all Comments for greater understand – nothing wrong in having your arsed kicked if it furthers your own knowledge.

And no, I’m not BigB’s mum, which would come as a shock to both my wife and nipper.

BigB
BigB
Sep 3, 2019 8:12 AM
Reply to  Chris Rogers

A brother from another mother, perhaps! 😀

BigB
BigB
Sep 3, 2019 12:51 AM
Reply to  MLS

MLS: On the point of corporate manipulation of the AGW issue: I have never deviated from affirming that the agenda is being manipulated. On the very thread you mention I pointed out that the likes of the Club Of Rome were behind the initial ‘Limits to Growth’ study by the Meadow’s. However, the science is good – and verified by meta-analysis – the de-population agenda is spurious and weaponised. It is the global priviliged top fifteen-twenty percent of consumers that are overconsuming resources – not the excluded ‘overpopulated’ 85%. If you want to trawl back far enough: when anyone praised Mikhail Gorbachev – you will find a comment of mine beneath pointing out his real agenda – leading the celebrity climate change charities and what I termed ‘corporate commoning’ …the manipulation of the tragedy of the commons to leverage TNCs in control of common resources – particularly water rights. So,… Read more »

MLS
MLS
Sep 2, 2019 10:14 PM
Reply to  Chris Rogers

PS – how exactly does the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics apply in the context you are using it in?

Elementor
Elementor
Sep 2, 2019 10:24 PM
Reply to  MLS

It’s a face-off of the Pseuds! They look like they’re agreeing but they’re actually trying to outdo each other in “I am the bizz” bullcrappery.

One is like trying to give the impression he’s plugged in to the pulse of the entire western finance system. The other is trying to be the Buddha of the Forum, and we’re all supposed to be knocked on our asses by his stunning insights and wisdom.

It’s hilarious.

Chris Rogers
Chris Rogers
Sep 3, 2019 12:39 AM
Reply to  Elementor

Funny, I have no insights, I have a firm grasp of the prevailing economic system we inhabit and understand it to be unsustainable – please contest that proposition.

Chris Rogers
Chris Rogers
Sep 3, 2019 12:22 AM
Reply to  MLS

This post covers the actual energy side of the equation: https://www.businessinsider.com/oil-drum-energy-growth-2011-7 If you accept its proposition and emphasis on growth, then I trust you concur we live in a debt-based global economy and that much of said debt issuance is via banks & debt capital markets (privately issued debt) or sovereign debt, that is debt issued by the State with interest payable – all said debt must be serviced, and/or eventually paid off and in order for this all to happen, me must generate growth, which equates to higher energy demand – but, the above posted article indicates clearly we have real limits imposed on growth as we project growth further into the future due to constraints associated with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, namely, you cannot have perpetual GDP growth fuelled by ever increasing energy requirements as energy growth has real limits. So, if the above, in the actual… Read more »

BigB
BigB
Sep 3, 2019 11:09 AM
Reply to  Chris Rogers

Quick rule of thumb: at 3% compound annual rate of growth …we have to double ALL existing source to sink bio-physical flows every 23 years. And double the doubling every 46 years. Extrapolating from the recent Leeds Sustainability Centre research I have been quoting (papers available from Leeds but paywalled) …in the 13 year study period (1997-2012) UK national level energy throughput DECREASED 23%. To interpolate: instead of the computed doubling, we will be halving. Even if this is “back of a fag packet” reckoning …the trend implications are clear. The bio-physical economy and our conceptual economy are pulling in opposition …and we are in the middle. All our economic, political, and psychological calculus is based on a demonstrably false econometric. Austerity is the political imposition to maintain the falling rate of profit. The 46% of our contracting economy will be subsidised by us …whoever is in power. That is… Read more »

Fair dinkum
Fair dinkum
Sep 2, 2019 11:59 PM
Reply to  BigB

Or, as Erich Fromm put it:
‘To Have Or To Be’

lundiel
lundiel
Sep 2, 2019 6:19 PM

Off topic but Johnson’s bottled it. I’m a leave voter but I’d do anything to get Corbyn in government, this is the one and only possibility….use it wisely.

Kitth
Kitth
Sep 2, 2019 7:46 PM
Reply to  lundiel

I too am a leave voter, but I would gladly stay in the EU if it meant Jeremy taking the keys to No 10. 75% of the PLP.would rather Brexit than see Corbyn in power. I’d love to see the look on their smug faces. BLAIR is pushing for a GE next year in the belief that they can get rid of him and put someone like Ben, Phillips in his place. Just watch the MSM go into overdrive . Interesting times.

Gwyn
Gwyn
Sep 2, 2019 5:58 PM

This is the song I was listening to as I read this article:

Agostin Barrios
Agostin Barrios
Sep 2, 2019 10:32 PM
Reply to  Gwyn

Excellent – played on an instrument the lifetime of which now spans three centuries – if we truly knew how to live together on this planet – we too could enjoy such longevity

Gwyn
Gwyn
Sep 2, 2019 11:23 PM

Glad you enjoyed it, Agostin. :o)

(And I agree with your comment).

Gwyn
Gwyn
Sep 2, 2019 5:54 PM

As the old Buddhist joke goes: ”Don’t just do something – sit there!”

Ben Trovata
Ben Trovata
Sep 2, 2019 5:45 PM

Contrariwise…G.B. Shaw asked us to consider connections between the word ” idiot”,and being a specialist. *************************************************”Mark Twain said, “Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.”