60

Don’t Look, Don’t See: Pesticides in the MSM

It is past time for honest media reporting on the impacts of pesticides

Colin Todhunter

The UK-based Independent online newspaper recently published an article about a potential link between air pollution from vehicles and glaucoma. It stated that according to a new study air pollution is linked to the eye condition that causes blindness.

The report explained that researchers had looked at vision tests carried out on more than 111,000 people across Britain between 2006 and 2010 and cross-referenced results against levels of air pollution in their neighbourhoods. Those living in areas with higher amounts of fine particulate matter were at least 6% more likely to have glaucoma than those in the least polluted areas.

Glaucoma affects half a million people in the UK and can cause blindness if left untreated. However, the study cited by The Independent, published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, was unable to prove that air pollution was a trigger.

Following the article, environmentalist Dr Rosemary Mason put together a 20-page report on glyphosate and has sent it out to key public health officials and media outlets, including The Independent’s editor.

In her report, she states that the European Chemicals Agency classifies glyphosate as a substance that causes serious eye damage and is toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. But she claims that the media still remains silent on the matter. Even in UK towns and cities, glyphosate-based Roundup herbicide is still being sprayed on weeds and super-weeds which have become Roundup-resistant.

Mason implores The Independent and other mainstream media outlets to write with honesty about the use and harmful effects of glyphosate-based weedicides and other agrochemicals. She quotes the UN expert on Toxics, Baskut Tuncak, who in 2017 urged the EU to put children’s health before pesticides.

Children form the most vulnerable part of the population as pesticides can adversely affect their development.

Offering insight into the incidence of cataracts in England, Mason notes that annual rates of admission for cataract surgery rose 10‐fold from 1968 to 2004: from 62 episodes per 100,000 population to 637.

A 2016 study by the WHO also confirmed that the incidence of cataracts had greatly increased: in ‘A global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks’ it says that cataracts are the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Globally, cataracts are responsible for 51% of blindness. An estimated 20 million individuals suffer from this degenerative eye disease.

Mason discusses long waiting lists for cataracts in England. Because the NHS cannot cope with the pressure, private companies are cashing in. The growing demand for cataract operations is forcing the NHS to send increasing numbers of patients to be treated privately.

In Wales, where Mason resides, 35,000 patients are at risk of going blind from macular degeneration and glaucoma while on the NHS waiting list. All the municipal councils in Wales use glyphosate-based herbicides. Glyphosate now accounts for about 50% of all herbicide use in the US.

About 75% of glyphosate use has occurred since 2006, with the global glyphosate market projected to reach $11.74 billion by 2023.

Figures for the use of glyphosate in the UK show a similar trend, which Mason has documented in her many reports. And let us not forget at this point that the current Conservative government regards Brexit as an ideal opportunity to usher in crops that have been genetically engineered to withstand the application of glyphosate or similar chemicals. The agrochemicals sector stands in the wings salivating at the prospect.

This has nothing to do with boosting yields or ‘feeding the world’ as Boris Johnson asserts (claims which fail to stand up to scrutiny) but has everything to do with facilitating industry ambitions.

Never in history has a chemical been used so pervasively. Glyphosate is in our air, water, plants, animals, grains, vegetables and meats. It’s in beer and wine, children’s breakfast cereal and snack bars and mother’s breast milk. It’s even in our vaccines.

Of course, the power of the pesticides companies has been well noted.

In 2017, global agrochemical corporations were severely criticised by UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Hilal Elver. A report presented to the UN human rights council accused them of the “systematic denial of harms”, “aggressive, unethical marketing tactics” and heavy lobbying of governments which has “obstructed reforms and paralysed global pesticide restrictions.”

The report authored by Hilal Elver and Baskut Tuncak says pesticides have “catastrophic impacts on the environment, human health and society as a whole”, including an estimated 200,000 deaths a year from acute poisoning. Its authors said: “It is time to create a global process to transition toward safer and healthier food and agricultural production.”

Hilal Elver says:

Using more pesticides is nothing to do with getting rid of hunger.  According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), we are able to feed nine billion people today. Production is definitely increasing, but the problem is poverty, inequality and distribution.”

Elver said many of the pesticides are used on commodity crops, such as palm oil and soy, not the food needed by the world’s hungry people:

The corporations are not dealing with world hunger; they are dealing with more agricultural activity on large scales.”

Mason notes that chronic exposure to pesticides has been linked to a range of diseases and conditions and that certain pesticides can persist in the environment for decades and pose a threat to the entire ecological system on which food production depends.

The excessive use of pesticides contaminates soil and water sources, causing loss of biodiversity and destroying the natural enemies of pests.

The impact of such overuse also imposes staggering costs on national economies. Moreover, the use of neonicotinoid pesticides is particularly worrying because they are linked to a systematic collapse in the number of bees around the world. Some 71% of crop species are bee-pollinated.

Mason goes on to describe the various lawsuits in the US against Bayer (which bought Monsanto) and the tactics used by Monsanto to conceal glyphosate-based Roundup’s carcinogenicity, including capturing regulatory agencies, corrupting public officials, bribing scientists and engaging in scientific fraud to delay its day of reckoning.

Following the court decision to award in favour of Dewayne Johnson, attorney Robert Kennedy Jr said the following at the post-trial press conference:

…you not only see many people injured, but you also see a subversion of democracy. You see the corruption of public officials, the capture of agencies that are supposed to protect us all from pollution.

The agencies become captured by the industries they are supposed to regulate. The corruption of science, the falsification of science, and we saw all those things happen here.

This is a company (Monsanto) that used all of the plays in the playbook developed over 60 years by the tobacco industry to escape the consequences of killing one of every five of its customers… Monsanto… has used those strategies…”

There is now also a good deal of scientific evidence linking glyphosate to obesity, depression, Alzheimer’s, ADHD, autism, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, kidney disease, inflammatory bowel disease and brain, breast and prostate cancer, miscarriage, birth defects and declining sperm counts.

Strong science suggests glyphosate is the culprit in the exploding epidemics of celiac disease, colitis, gluten sensitivities, diabetes and non-alcoholic liver cancer which, for the first time, is attacking children as young as 10.

Researchers also peg glyphosate as a potent endocrine disruptor, which interferes with sexual development in children.

The compound is also a chelator that removes important minerals from the body, including iron, magnesium, zinc, selenium and molybdenum. Roundup disrupts the microbiome destroying beneficial bacteria in the human gut and triggering brain inflammation and other ill effects.

Neurotransmitter changes in the brain have been detected due to exposure to glyphosate. This is why, according to Mason, there are so many mental health and psychiatric disorders, depression, suicides, anxiety and violence among children and adults. It is even found in popular breakfast cereals marketed for UK children.

And this says nothing about the cocktail of pesticides sprayed on crops. The Soil Association and PAN UK have indicated that exposure to mixtures of pesticides commonly found in UK food, water and soil may be harming the health of both humans and wildlife.

A quarter of all food and over a third of fruit and vegetables consumed in the UK contain pesticide cocktails, with some items containing traces of up to 14 different pesticides.

The UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Environment has identified the rights threatened by environmental harm, including the rights to life, health, food and water and has mapped obligations to protect against such harm from private actors.

In effect, where pesticides are concerned, the public are being denied the right to a healthy environment.

But it’s not just the powerful pesticides lobby that is to blame here. Rosemary Mason says the British public (and indeed people across the world) have a right to information.

However, she concludes that the public have been denied this because mainstream media outlets have on the whole for too long opted to remain silent on the pesticides issue.

This article touches on just a few of the points in Rosemary Mason’s report. Readers can access the full text of ‘Glyphosatecauses serious eye damage’ on the academia.edu site.

SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN

If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

60 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Antonym
Antonym
Dec 7, 2019 5:33 AM

For those interested in agriculture, food, and “greening” here is an interesting article about US agricultural bio fuel subsidies making (world) food prices much higher apart from other negative side effects: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/ethanol-has-forsaken-us/602191/

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 5, 2019 8:24 AM

Mason goes on to describe the various lawsuits in the US against Bayer (which bought Monsanto) and the tactics used by Monsanto to conceal… Concealment? Monsanto? The former Monsanto Company manufactured DDT from 1944 until 1957, when it ceased production for economic reasons. This halt occurred long before any environmental concerns were brought to the table… [Emphasis added] — Bayer/Monsanto Well there’s old sadsack Rachael Carson down the Official Memory Hole. Good riddance to all such inconvenient busybodies. The following is a paraphrase of an excerpt from the letter Rachel Carson sent to Reader’s Digest in 1945 offering to write an article about the dangers of DDT [she refused all requests for any republications of, or the publication of any excerpts from, any of her writings]: The experiments at Patuxent have been planned to show what effects DDT may have if applied to wide areas: how it will affect insects,… Read more »

richard le sarc
richard le sarc
Dec 27, 2019 11:25 PM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

Peerlessly nassty.

jay
jay
Dec 4, 2019 9:56 AM

Glyphosate is not classed as a poison.
At one this was also true for, asbestos, tobacco etc…people put mercury on their hats and drank arsenic as a tonic.
We seen the first case against Monsanto, a groundsman who’s non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was attributed to the use of Roundup…
So, now it is admitted, Glyphosate causes cancer…

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 5, 2019 12:01 AM
Reply to  jay

Glyphosate is not classed as a poison. Glyphosate is slippery in that regard. Taken in isolation and very carefully proselytizing a restricted temporal view of any adverse effects, you could probably drink a glass of it and still be functioning well enough for that to be taken as a demonstration of the validity of the classification before the news cycle moved on to this year’s Turner prize or whatever. However, it is cannot be used as an effective commercial herbicide in its pure form and the various formulations of it, such as Roundup (just one of hundreds of variants), all process it and/or use modifying additives to various degrees. These not only make it much more toxic straight off the shelf, they also work to reduce the time it takes to exhibit its commercial “desirable” (as distinct from biologically damaging) effects. Most commercially sponsored research relating to broader environmental damage… Read more »

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 4, 2019 12:36 AM

A couple of months ago I saw some council contractors doing spot spraying of verge weeds from huge and obviously heavy containers on their backs. “JC*,” I said to them, “the little packs were several hundred times beyond bad enough, have you taking to flooding the place with it now?” “It’s salt water,” they said, “we’ve been told to switch to spot spraying with salt water only.”

* Jeremy Corbyn

wardropper
wardropper
Dec 4, 2019 5:56 PM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

And, as we all know, salt water is just great for the environment…
Birds drink it, fresh water fish swim in it, crops thrive on it, and it’s cheap too!
Nice one, council contractors.
Or does it restrict its presence to the verges…?
C’mon guys, we’re going to have to go all the way here. This is mere ineffectual tinkering.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 5, 2019 12:46 AM
Reply to  wardropper

Nice one, council contractors. I suspect that the gardener’s/council’s contribution to the sodium chloride load around an average winter snowbound highway would amount to the level of “insignificant”. Or does your local council pour your kneejerk scorn rather than salt onto its winter roads to keep the traffic moving? Very ecological. You may not remember this, Jumbobutt, but when you were an infant, shortly after your breech birth, it was a big leap for you to go from recognising nothing at all to even just beginning to discern the shape of your mummy’s face. Now look at you. Just a few months later and you can spot a productive pair of tits from halfway down the high street. And get it right, not shitforbains: like all contractors, they were doing what they were told. You want them to refuse and ditch the council’s newly perceived salt water loads for the… Read more »

wardropper
wardropper
Dec 5, 2019 2:34 AM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

Your abuse notwithstanding, the council’s sodium chloride contribution is much more significant than you imply. I’ve seen it. But there’s no need either to assume I am a supporter of glyphosate in preference. I am far from that.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 5, 2019 6:35 AM
Reply to  wardropper

I suspect that the gardener’s/council’s contribution to the sodium chloride load around an average winter snowbound highway would amount to the level of “insignificant”.

…the council’s sodium chloride contribution is much more significant than you imply.

I’m implying that in amongst the shedloads of crystal salt that is spread on snowbound roads, some gardener’s spot applications of dilute solutions of it to verge weeds is damn near nil. Are you contradicting that or are you just another keyboard pundit who gets too darling upset to read what’s written if your first quick impression is that some rude heckler has had the temerity to ruffle your carefully combed ego-feathers?

wardropper
wardropper
Dec 5, 2019 9:02 PM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

council’s contribution to the sodium chloride load around an average winter snowbound highway

I can only reply based on what you have stated.
I took “highway” to mean something more significant than a country pedestrian track. Americans use the term to mean, “motorway”, for example, and that is what I had in mind.
Let’s leave the personal attacks out of it, shall we?
My questioning some of your comments does not “darling upset” me at all, nor should my reply upset you.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 6, 2019 1:08 AM
Reply to  wardropper

I can only reply based on what you have stated. In the initial post I didn’t state anything except ‘verge’. That’s where your “nice one” was the first response. I took “highway” to mean something more significant than a country pedestrian track. Americans use the term to mean, “motorway”, for example, and that is what I had in mind. The ‘verge’ I was referring to is by the side of a main urban road. I was on the footpath, houses and gardens were on one side, they were on the other side, tending a narrow, concrete-bounded grass verge, four lanes of busy roadway was beyond them. Let’s leave the personal attacks out of it, shall we? Why? There was no personal attack, just plain old robust heckling with a few bits creative name-calling thrown in. What’s wrong with that? Most of the let’s rip the social order out by its… Read more »

wardropper
wardropper
Dec 6, 2019 4:37 PM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

My argument stands, as does the point I made, that salt is no real answer to the long-term problems we now face in our environment. It is too harmful in itself. My view is that a more genuinely scientific study of the mutual interactions of various plants could point to entirely natural ways of limiting their vulnerability to diseases and pests. By “genuinely scientific”, I mean scientific without the desperate need for shareholders to receive their regular dividends, regardless of the success of the investment concerned. But have it your way. I thought you actually had a point or two to make, and your very long-winded way of spoiling for a fight is easily dismissed with a simple “lol”. Of course you thrive on intended put-downs, because you belong on a site where others of your kind thrive. Life’s too short for that here, since most of us are no… Read more »

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 9, 2019 2:46 AM
Reply to  wardropper

Life’s too short for that here, since most of us are no longer in our teens.

“My sort?” I’m far closer to the telegram from the Queen that she doesn’t send any more than I am from the gold watch that no-one ever gave me. “Ignore list?” Chortle.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 9, 2019 3:29 AM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

Oops. For my “sort” read my “kind”. My bad.

But have it your way.
I thought you actually had a point or two to make, and your very long-winded way of spoiling for a fight…

“… have it my way”? I posted re the fact that my local council’s gardening contractors were (following instructions to) switch to a dilute salt solution to spot kill weeds, away from last year’s frankenchemicals; your first response is a snorty-haughty “Nice one, council contractors”; and I’m the one “spoiling for a fight”?

Then you follow up with some nothing implication about local council contractors being co-conspirators in the Deep State plus a dollop of transatlantic nomenclature confusion wherein ‘highway’ = ‘motorway’. Sheesh, tell that to Dick Turpin: couldn’t even get Black Bess through the gap at The Spaniards as the ancient scars on the walls attest.

wardropper
wardropper
Dec 5, 2019 2:45 AM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

Council contractors are also effectively a part of the council – whether they are supposed to be or not – rather like the way in which lobbyists are effectively a part of western government.
It was the council I was criticizing; not the men doing the spraying.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 5, 2019 6:53 AM
Reply to  wardropper

Council contractors are also effectively a part of the council – whether they are supposed to be or not…

Council contractors and their workers are increasingly poor schmucks caught up in the trap of trying to maintain a roof over their underwater mortgages while battling to survive the ravages of a rapidly growing gig economy and cynically cheapened imported labour.

It was the council I was criticizing; not the men doing the spraying.

“Nice one, council contractors?” Yeah, right. St Vitus’s dance?

wardropper
wardropper
Dec 5, 2019 8:56 PM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

Council contractors are also effectively a part of the council

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 6, 2019 2:53 PM
Reply to  wardropper

Council contractors are also effectively a part of the council Now that you’ve raised that point twice: in the UK not in general. In large cities most of the city-wide services such as integrated transport, water and sewerage services, etc., are handled by an over all city council but less universal services such as maintaining public open spaces, local public housing, libraries, street cleaning, rubbish collection etc., are adminstered by smaller, borough councils most of who’s outsourcing is to much smaller enterprises offering specific trades and chosen by open tender. These firms are basically SMBs and general have no political (or any) input into the council that contracts them. The borough councils invite tenders for property cleaning services, say, and that is what the firm that is awarded the contract does, in accordance with the specifications of the tender document, under the supervision of the council officer (not an elected… Read more »

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 5, 2019 6:57 AM
Reply to  wardropper

…fresh water fish swim in [salt water]…

That’s good. Otherwise they might havev pretty steep learning curve in the not too distant future.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 28, 2019 3:45 AM
Reply to  wardropper

A couple of months ago I saw some council contractors doing spot spraying of verge weeds […] “It’s salt water,” they said, “we’ve been told to switch to spot spraying with salt water only.” — Robbobbobin And, as we all know, salt water is just great for the environment… Birds drink it, fresh water fish swim in it, crops thrive on it, and it’s cheap too! Nice one, council contractors. — wardropper Have I just got your number, wardropper? Monsanto, the British government and the UK and EU regulators say that glyphosate is safer than table salt. But would table salt kill all these insects that we recorded in our photo-journals or cause apocalyptic declines globally?” — Rosemary Mason, quoted in Colin Todhunter’s The Right to Healthy Food: Poisoned with Pesticides Are you around here, BTL in the Off-Guardian, to help the world drop international shooting wars or to drop… Read more »

wardropper
wardropper
Dec 28, 2019 1:51 PM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

It’s called sarcasm, rob.
Nobody who reads the whole of my comments would misunderstand my tendency towards anger where pollution and corruption are concerned.
My reference to salt was simply to point out that too much salt in the environment is also deadly to wildlife, and, therefore to us. It wasn’t a scientific paper, but a reaction to the idea that switching from glyphosate to salt would solve all our problems.
It wouldn’t.

iskratov
iskratov
Dec 3, 2019 9:17 PM

Researchers found that the use of glyphosate around conventional and GM crops weakened their root systems, making them more vulnerable to disease and crop failures, such as that which has devastated Florida’s citrus crops. One independent scientist who determined that glyphosate destroys soil health tells … “When you spray glyphosate on a plant it’s like giving it AIDS.”
https://medium.com/@joan_baxter/book-review-whitewash-the-story-of-a-weed-killer-cancer-and-the-corruption-of-science-4d8652a54e80

BigB
BigB
Dec 3, 2019 12:22 PM

More excellence from Colin. As touched on: the importance of the human gut microbiome and its connection to the brain is only just coming to light. It has spawned a thousand science-lite articles and kindled the ‘Yakult’ era. The serious point is that the human microbiome is an important synthesiser of structural proteins; endocrine precursors; neurotransmitters; and is the major component of our immune system (our ‘second brain’). Impairment is not just cognitive impairment and learning difficulties – we are disrupting our own evolution. We are at the root of our own devolutionary psychopathology. To see this more clearly: what I feel we lack is a cohesive conceptual model. One framing all the seemingly divergent symptomatic aspects of our own auto-immune disease and aberrant psychology …from which we are all suffering. We can no longer afford to treat community health; personal mental health; psychology; economy; and ecology as separate spheres… Read more »

bevin
bevin
Dec 3, 2019 2:32 PM
Reply to  BigB

Good stuff. The world would be a richer place if you wrote English.

BigB
BigB
Dec 4, 2019 11:21 AM
Reply to  bevin

You get the gist, Bevin, I know you do. You even admitted to me that capitalism and ecology are totally incompatible. I even offered to go through the GND with you months ago: when I said that Labour’s GND is humanities suicide pact with green corporate finance. I don’t know how close you live to Calgary: but you agree with me that the tar sands and shale plays in North America are a flash in the pan. Tar is kerogen that needs boiling and purifying: by which time – when it goes to market – it is being sold at below the cost of production. Which is why production is slowing and the rig count keeps falling; and debt delinquencies and bankruptcies keep rising. And yet you still tacitly back the magical unrealism of the GND: judging by the resounding socialist call to arms you indulge in. You said it… Read more »

bevin
bevin
Dec 4, 2019 9:26 PM
Reply to  BigB

I have no interest in the Green New Deal except as a pleasant sign that a proper debate on the environment is likely to take place. As to Polanyi, the essence of a double movement is popular revulsion against (neo) liberalism. That seems to me to be taking the form of populism, a movement with which I have great sympathy. I’m unsure where you think I differ : I regard international trade/ division of labour as something that is going to need to be reduced to a mere trickle. If only to put an end to the plundering of tropical countries evident in every supermarket. I’m all in favour, it follows, of self sufficiency and reversing industrialism, to the benefit of all. I am not one of those people who sees capitalism as progress or believe in the cod marxism of the stages theories. As to this”The bottom line is… Read more »

wardropper
wardropper
Dec 31, 2019 3:46 PM
Reply to  BigB

I think I get the gist too, BigB. But we should stick to the gist. Life’s too short to read an encyclopedia every day.
To cut to the end – “The future is ours for the taking” – just show us how to start, and we’ll do the rest.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 4, 2019 11:56 AM
Reply to  bevin

See yas a Geordie then?

richard le sarc
richard le sarc
Dec 27, 2019 11:31 PM
Reply to  bevin

Brenda is clarity personified compared to McMurtry, although recent stuff I’ve seen from him is much easier to follow. Not that he is not absolutely correct in his observations, although I would not say that capitalism has entered a ‘cancer stage’, because it always was neoplastic. I’d prefer to say that it has entered its cachectic, end-stage, where the host withers away.

state sponsored
state sponsored
Dec 3, 2019 12:16 PM

“Healtcare Bondage”
The Americans want to dominate the food supply, by any mean possible to further entrench a tight grip on life on Earth.
But what a weird way to go about it, by marrying poison DNA to foods!
The Americans, not only placing entire populations into food supply bondage but also enforcing a Healtcare Bondage, as the more you eat the new stuff, the more you get sick.

state sponsored
state sponsored
Dec 3, 2019 12:08 PM

“Children form the most vulnerable part of the population as pesticides can adversely affect their development.”

Democratic society began in the Greek capital, Athens. And they used to get rid of weaker children. Only the strong allowed to survive. Right?
Today, let’s poison these kids, and brag, it is a practice to strengthen democracy. Don’t say, Big Pharma is reaping enormous profits from people’s illnesses.

iskratov
iskratov
Dec 3, 2019 7:15 PM

that was Sparta, not Athens. Sparta was not democratic, he practiced a sort of aristocratic communism among the nobles, while the rest of the population was submissive …

Rhys Jaggar
Rhys Jaggar
Dec 3, 2019 11:54 AM

It is very important when taking statistics in isolation not to immediately assign blame to something which correlates. The first rule of investigation must always be: ‘correlation is not causation until proven otherwise’. So without saying Mr Todhunter and Rosemary Mason are wrong in what they say, I would ask them to expand their discussions to the following questions: 1. Is the increase in cataracts on an age-for-age basis or is it simply that people are living longer so more people actually live long enough to develop cataracts? Cancer is a classic series of ailments where cases rose hugely due to people not dying of something else first.Epidemiology shows cancers is linked to the sixth or seventh power of age, so you can see why increasing life expectancy from 55 to 85 causes cancer to increase hugely… So I want to see more cataracts in the 55-65 year age group… Read more »

state sponsored
state sponsored
Dec 3, 2019 12:30 PM
Reply to  Rhys Jaggar

More logic for entertainment:
5. Chemical compounds in Tobacco are very strong. So, smoking cigarettes must offer a great protection against the SARS virus (cigarette companies loves this logic)
6. Similarly, glyphosates are so efficient in destroying unwanted organism that they must be adopted as the chemicals of choice to destroy cancer cells (watch Bayer’s share prices skyrocketing)

iskratov
iskratov
Dec 3, 2019 7:18 PM
Reply to  Rhys Jaggar

”Strong science suggests glyphosate is the culprit in the exploding epidemics of celiac disease, colitis, gluten sensitivities, diabetes and non-alcoholic liver cancer which, for the first time, is attacking children as young as 10.”

state sponsored
state sponsored
Dec 3, 2019 9:14 PM
Reply to  iskratov

“Strong science suggests glyphosate is the culprit in the exploding epidemics of celiac disease, colitis, gluten sensitivities, diabetes and non-alcoholic liver cancer which, for the first time, is attacking children as young as 10.”

These are all ‘Performance Targets’ for Big Poison and Big Pharma.
Performance targets are the desired outcomes set in business activities planning.
A critical key milestone for success of these business activities has been achieved by getting governments around the world to give the stamp of approval to various poisons –including alcohol– for widespread use.
And in case someone missed it: these developments (spreading poisons at every opportunity) form fundemental pillars upon which today’s Western Civilisation stand –no ifs, no buts.

Brian Steere
Brian Steere
Dec 4, 2019 11:25 AM
Reply to  iskratov

In the circumstances, concrete proofs are hard to bring forth in a court of law or any scientific institution, when multibillion dollar interests hire lawyers to exploit any possible way of insinuating doubts – along with all the dirty tricks of the trade. The precautionary principle should be ‘At least do no harm’ – but it works now as ‘At least do no harm to corporate profits’. For the capture of regulators, media and politicians (broad spectrum dominance), really works as the foxes running the hen house. But independent science does give perfectly understandable vectors of cause and effect for glyphosate as a direct mechanism for the onset of what you list and a lot more. Stephanie Seneff being a key detective in this regard. If it were just a gravy train of greed, the profiteers could be brought to transparency and account, but it is also about wielding power… Read more »

Brian Steere
Brian Steere
Dec 4, 2019 12:17 PM
Reply to  Rhys Jaggar

The weakness of the article is pinning specific correlations as causal to one agency. The strength of war by stealth and guile by humans upon others of their kind is in plausible deniability and ‘justifiable’ and ‘morally necessary’ interventions under a ‘self-protective’ emotional manipulation. The scientific exploration of biology (or physics) is not primarily aligned with uncovering truth, but is funded and founded in a marketisation and weaponisation mentality that generally runs behind a cover story of ‘progress’ or ‘for the human good’ but increasing runs as the only priesthood and power by which to forfend impending disaster. IE: when you have milked the dream to death and degradation, milk the nighmare. That is what the Green Agenda does – and in the process contracts the ‘Economy’ or systemic and manipulative coercion to sustain a core elitism of possession and control. You may not relate to my way of expression… Read more »

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
Dec 4, 2019 3:54 PM
Reply to  Rhys Jaggar

So I want to see more cataracts in the 55-65 year age group rather than it solely being in the 70-80 year range before I start worrying about active harm rather than old banger syndrome….

More complicated than that:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/261561
+
Still doesn’t meet your requirement.
+
When I was in my early 70s a through opthalmic examination for a different problem showed, according to the opthalmologist, the ‘first signs’ of incipient cataracts. I was in my late 70s before I noticed any of the classic symptoms.
+
Doesn’t even begin to meet your requirement.
+
I don’t live in Wisconsin.
+
Really doesn’t meet your requirement.
_____________________________________________

Grand total = BigB’s oft-repeated point.

jay
jay
Dec 3, 2019 11:30 AM

Farmers spray with glyphosphate just prior to harvest as it helps dry out the crop.

Richard Steele
Richard Steele
Dec 3, 2019 7:06 PM
Reply to  jay

Yes- soybean plants, in particular, are frequently SOAKED with massive doses of glyphosate just prior to harvest.
E I see that here where I live…a verdant green field of soybeans will be sprayed, and by the following afternoon the entire field is the dark brown color of old pipe tobacco.
My gut instincts say, “Wow, that can’t be good- surely no one would want to eat that”. But those soybeans are harvested and mixed into SO MANY FOOD PRODUCTS.
Have we, as a species, gone mad?

jay
jay
Dec 3, 2019 8:47 PM
Reply to  Richard Steele

It started in Scotland, where there was a difficulty harvesting crops because of damp weather.

state sponsored
state sponsored
Dec 3, 2019 9:23 PM
Reply to  Richard Steele

Yes- soybean plants, in particular, are frequently SOAKED with massive doses of glyphosate just prior to harvest.
E I see that here where I live…a verdant green field of soybeans will be sprayed, and by the following afternoon the entire field is the dark brown color of old pipe tobacco.

And nothing about these posisons is mentioned in the ingredient list, why is that? One would think, the regulators in government has the population health at heart, wouldn’t you?!
Even if these posions are approved (and they are approved), why are they not mentioned in the ingredient list?

Brian Steere
Brian Steere
Dec 4, 2019 9:59 AM
Reply to  Richard Steele

The madness is not new, it has merely escaped the checks and balances – to now be setting the global agenda.
Deceit passing as truth, as science, as progress, as self-inflations or convenient untruths by which to run ahead of debts and use the leverage to deny the debt and dump it on others.

Brian Steere
Brian Steere
Dec 4, 2019 10:05 AM
Reply to  jay

In some places more than others – it kills the crop which puts all its energy into going to seed – which as convenient and profitable for bring all to harvest. Dead is desiccated – yes.
Farmers are told that

  • vaccines
  • pesticides are perfectly safe – and so they don’t have to worry because billion dollar science has reassured them as well as providing a service for more profit on less input.

    Brian Steere
    Brian Steere
    Dec 3, 2019 10:21 AM

    The usual ‘cover story’ for industrial human biocide is some vector of infectious disease. There is a linkage here because under exposures to toxicity – what we call sickness is the mobilised as the body’s detoxing defence. But human thinking attacks the messenger – or the symptom as if the cause. Bolstering and strengthening immunity as wholeness of being, is usurped by the attack and undermining of natural immunity by a corporately managed ‘immunity’. The protection racket of a split mind that works the threat and the protection as two facets of on thing. The healthcare that induces and manages disease as a business model while normalising it as the natural and protected freedom to ‘identity’ in managed ‘cover story’ that is itself marketised and weaponised against ‘threat’ to an overriding ‘control’ mentality. In the same way the conditions of the soil and methods of agriculture, substitute a brute force… Read more »

    Brian Steere
    Brian Steere
    Dec 4, 2019 9:54 AM
    Reply to  iskratov

    Truthout is purveying propaganda. Anyone with a capacity to WATCH the mind and NOTICE emotion can pick up the weaponised language immediately.. When truth is made a weapon it is killed for the sake of a ‘holy war’ which in truth is war upon wholeness. I don’t tell anyone what to believe nor trick them into believing through fear and reaction. I hold that the biocide issue is a real and pervasive agency of destruction and degradation that is being masked over with lies – while the carbon dioxide extinction (sic) is a man made climate of fear – either in taking the bait and running under its narrative, or in recognising the power behind the campaign as too fearful to openly contradict, and then finally for both groups – of seeking personal profits as a result of aligning in the narrative. While the plan includes to cut back on… Read more »

    Robbobbobin
    Robbobbobin
    Dec 5, 2019 4:19 AM
    Reply to  Brian Steere

    Germ theory – as the attribution of causative agency to external and invisible pathogens, is simply the restatement of belief in demons as a scientifically defined and therefore regulated and controlled agency of intervention. Pasteur – who courted power, fame and fortune within the scientific explorations of his day is said to have recanted his championing of its premise on his deathbed. For as Bechamp discovered, the terrain is the primary condition that gives rise to the biota. We have it backwards. Maybe (maybe, perchance, perhaps, possibly, conceivably, some mileages may varyably…) “is said“? Not nearly good enough. Susan Dorey gets it very much gooder: Until an assistant confirmed for me that Delhoume’s book does not contain the recant, I was willing to believe that Bird’s reputation as a meticulous researcher and documenter would have to suffice as proof that Pasteur really did recant his germ theory. I no longer… Read more »

    Brian Steere
    Brian Steere
    Dec 5, 2019 5:57 PM
    Reply to  Robbobbobin

    I made clear that the recant was anecdotal and I don’t have any investment as to whether it is true or not. Devotion to principle has merit that achieves consistent results where devotion to fame and fortune will select the results that serve the purpose. If Bechamp was limited in his cultural outlook – do you score in judgement over him for not suffering your own? However the early ideal of science had a democratic impulse in serving both one’s nation and mankind, rather than bending or holding secret for private agenda. The principles involved in the science that became ‘the germ theory’ were a choice between two options: 1. Personal independent creative agency – taken AS IF mind apart and set over life – but which then meets limitations, oppositions, adversities and conflicts with enemies to be denied, eradicated, held in check or managed. or 2. Balanced awareness and… Read more »

    Robbobbobin
    Robbobbobin
    Dec 9, 2019 1:09 AM
    Reply to  Brian Steere

    Your comment read as a personal smear and unworthy of you.

    My comment is absolutely worthy of me, as are all comments I make, on and offline. If some of them make me look like shit and others give me the appearance of a saint, that’s how it is: ‘look like’ and ‘appearance’ with–when they are not one a few genuine accidents of semantics or the many temporal ambiguities of low-bandwidth, asynchronous serial communication such as this–at least some correspondence to actuality. Like most human beings–all that I’ve ever met, in fact–worthinesswise I’m like a shit that’s been dipped in saint-coloured paint.

    Robbobbobin
    Robbobbobin
    Dec 9, 2019 1:12 AM
    Reply to  Robbobbobin

    For “…not one a few genuine accidents of semantics…” read “…not one of a few genuine accidents of semantics…”

    Robbobbobin
    Robbobbobin
    Dec 9, 2019 2:36 AM
    Reply to  Robbobbobin

    We have it backwards.

    Oh yes, and: I thought I “made clear”–to use your phrase–that that looks suspiciously like half-arsed, divine, fence-positioning bullshit dressed up as ontological profundity. Ontology, noun, 99% waffle on 0.99% obscurantism. “Being” will not be described, analyzed or classified. Even the cat knows that. Other than that, that was point where I hit the reply button. After that my mind glazed over, so I hit the next button (tl;dr).

    Brian Steere
    Brian Steere
    Dec 9, 2019 9:30 AM
    Reply to  Robbobbobin

    You can indeed hold a negative appreciation for yourself and thus extend it to others. But the self that YOU make for yourself (and others) is then the choice that you are actively accepting in place of the freedom that you are created to be – and so simply Are. As you say that you know being cannot be described – excepting as ‘beingnesses’ or attributes assigned, flagged or attributed to being, you know that all that you give it is the measure of your receipt, and not the result of false flagged assertions that DO the very thing they present to defend against. The Golden Rule rests on self-honesty – for otherwise, if you believe you are a shit and deserve shit you will treat others as as the shit you believe yourself to be. As you are claiming to know – honesty is hateful and proud of it.… Read more »

    Jim Porter
    Jim Porter
    Dec 3, 2019 9:31 AM

    So, we are killing the bees, cutting down trees and poisoning the plants. Not enough, make sure everyone has a lingering painful death as well. I give up.

    state sponsored
    state sponsored
    Dec 3, 2019 12:39 PM
    Reply to  Jim Porter

    “we are killing the bees, cutting down trees and poisoning the plants. Not enough, make sure everyone has a lingering painful death as well”
    Surely, this is a small price for something, some Exceptional American strategists want to achieve.

    Brian Steere
    Brian Steere
    Dec 9, 2019 10:27 AM
    Reply to  Jim Porter

    The degradation of our own cognitive function, digestive function and immune response or vital function is masked over as multi-factorial – which allows anything to be posited as a scapegoat and cast our or made sacrifice of, while persisting in the sin. Self-hatred or hate of Life is a mind made insane BY hatred or blame and attack. The whole notion of possession and control can also be seen as the insulation from a dispossessing ‘blame and attack’ – therefore to seek to monopolise such ‘power’ is to align in it AS power. Perhaps the understandings that arise in the process of killing Life uncover not only the killer but the Life. Nature as ‘Holy Victim’ is inherent to the self-hating environmentalism that the likes of Monsanto et al propagate as part of farming human minds. Thus they ‘outsource’ their biocidal intent to the population at large. That is how… Read more »

    Frank Speaker
    Frank Speaker
    Dec 3, 2019 7:07 AM

    Excellent article. The analogy with the tobacco industry is spot on.

    Nothing will change though, there’s too many vested interests and vast sums if money tied up in this industry and agribusiness.

    Fortunately individuals do have the possibility to reduce their exposure to these poisons by purchasing organic foods. Sure, there will be some product substitution/ fraud in that supply chain, but it’s still way better than doing nothing.

    Brian Steere
    Brian Steere
    Dec 3, 2019 11:47 AM
    Reply to  Frank Speaker

    Tobacco crops are drenched in pesticides and chemical additives. Tobacco is the ‘scientifically correct’ scapegoat for the moral crusader who has thus opened the way to assign anything else to such parameters and engineer society accordingly. Howbeit we are deceived. Some people have some degree of freedom to reduce some of their exposure to some of the toxicities applied by negligence and disregard at best or by design at worst. Fraud is already pervasive in the food supply – you do not necessarily know what you are taking in or sharing out. Profit before principle normalises unprincipled or lawless behaviours. To say nothing will change is perhaps a symptom that you also have too many vested interests in presuming to persist in business as usual to actually open a willingness for positive or integrative change in your own life. ‘Better the devil we know’? – or think we know. Everything… Read more »