YouTube outlaws “contradicting” the World Health Organization
Google’s “anti-misinformation” rules outright ban free debate and expression on Covid19
Catte Black
Image source: Citizens for Europe
YouTube’s censorship of alternative Covid19 narratives has become increasingly overt. Back on May 20th it released its still current ‘policy’ which unashamedly tells potential creators:
Don’t post content on YouTube if it includes any of the following:
The list of unacceptable topics and views is fairly extensive
- Denial that COVID-19 exists
- Claims that people have not died from COVID-19
- Claims that there’s a guaranteed vaccine for COVID-19
- Claims that a specific treatment or medicine is a guaranteed cure for COVID-19
- Claims that certain people have immunity to COVID-19 due to their race or nationality
- Encouraging taking home remedies instead of getting medical treatment when sick
- Discouraging people from consulting a medical professional if they’re sick
- Content that claims that holding your breath can be used as a diagnostic test for COVID-19
- Videos alleging that if you avoid Asian food, you won’t get the coronavirus
- Videos alleging that setting off fireworks can clean the air of the virus
- Claims that COVID-19 is caused by radiation from 5G networks
- Videos alleging that the COVID-19 test is the cause of the virus
- Claims that countries with hot climates will not experience the spread of the virus
- Videos alleging that social distancing and self-isolation are not effective in reducing the spread of the virus
Now we may all agree some of these banned opinions sound odd, even ridiculous. But that’s not the point. Free speech includes the freedom to be odd, ridiculous and plain wrong. Once that right is gone – free speech no longer exists.
We also need to be sure we don’t let the more risible elements obscure the fact that some very rational and mainstream avenues of thought are being banned from expression here. Including incredibly sweeping statements such as [our emphasis]:
YouTube doesn’t allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts the World Health Organization (WHO) or local health authorities
But the prohibition that might be most significant is the first.
Apparently you can’t go on YouTube and simply say covid19 doesn’t exist.
You can say bubonic plague doesn’t exist. You can say malaria doesn’t exist. You can question the reality of cancer, diabetes, rubella, chicken pox, hantavirus, African Green Monkey disease, the common cold and any other pathology you can think of.
Except covid19.
The real question is – why?
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Why do people still use these platforms?
they have shut down the world for a bloody cold.
mummified, or feminised, this is the end of the line for weak decadent western civilisation. america might be about to get a corpse as its president while unsealed court documents show bill clinton, kevin spacey and a whole host of other sick rich famous perverts should be in jail or executed, and not on the telescreen smiling and telling us what to think every second.
no debate is allowed, all dissent is censored, propaganda is continuously poured down the minds of most people who are still watching the news every day and trusting that information while being trained to disregard anything or anyone that disagrees. this is a fear-based shock trauma psychological operation inflicted by government forces who have been developing these techniques for years.
for those of us who can see through it, it looks like a child’s puppet show, like sellotape on the lunar lander: saying masks are a waste of time and then 6 months later telling everyone to wear them and no one questioning it (apart from the few.) erasing the views of ordinary doctors all over the world because it would end the fear and people would go back to normal. but they don’t want us to go back to normal, they want us in a constantly heightened state of panic and confusion, hence the contradictory information and non sensical edicts like johnson’s yesterday of ‘stay home if you want to avoid a lockdown.’
we’re there folks, the time orwell and huxley and london and nietzsche and everyone warned us about.
it’s not a joke, people have been led mad, by decades of fear-based trauma psy ops like all of those fake phony hoax terrorist and shooter attacks. plus messing with the ionosphere and the world’s weather systems so they can switch sunny and rainy days on and off (again, no one noticing how sunny it was during the whole lockdown, and now we’ve had weeks of chemtrailed grey and changeable crap) – it is well known that the weather affects people’s moods.
they have also changed what we used to call ‘food’ into some specialist high end item so that most of what we now ingest would probably kill our ancestors. and then years of dumbing down people through control of the education system and common core/ everyone’s brilliant type policies so that no one is taught how to think they are simply told what to think, and are emotionally unable to even accept someone has a different point of view let alone consider changing their first-given information.
i think people know there’s something wrong, at the back of their minds they’re asking themselves should they really be doing this, but then they see everyone else doing it, so it must not be completely abnormal. they have social engineered nations of unthinking zombies who willingly accept whatever you tell them on the telescreen as long as you tell them over and over again for weeks and weeks on end, and never let them hear any other information.
they got people not only by the balls, but the mind, hypnotised, and ready to defend their insanity. don’t stop speaking the truth and being a light for sanity and true normality for one second. peace xxx
Well put Catte. Your article is sweet and to the point. I think that Robert F. Kennedy answers your question in equally clear and simple terms. He says (in his ‘debate’ with Alan Dershowitz) that Sars CoV 2 is too big to fail. Anthony Fauci, who has spent $500,000,000 on the ‘cure’ and has a team of five associates who, like himself, will reap royalties on the vaccine that they are backing, isn’t going to back off now, any more than his class (which includes all kinds of gangster billionaires, like Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, who need that biosecurity State to become reality so that their targetted markets and their police State goals can be reached) is going to back off of the global biosecurity police State that it has invested in and is in the middle of rolling out (over the people, crushing them).
Sars CoV 2 Is Too Big To Fail / https://www.bitchute.com/video/m5SyhdXS6fuB/
The outline for Orwell’s 1984 can be found in his essay “Looking Back on the Spanish War”. Although Penguin (“Orwell in Spain”) states that the date is uncertain (~1942/3), the Orwell Foundation states:
– Written August 1942, Sections I, II, III, and VII printed in New Road, June 1943
New Road’s omission of sections IV, V and VI is highly significant. The editorial note (Penguin p.344) states:
– The sections omitted from this essay dealt with the danger that, by the falsification of history, political leaders might obtain control of the past as well as of the future . . .
Hence, just as Big Tech is currently censoring any opposition who get too prominent and too effective, Orwell was himself being censored.
—
Orwell: Looking Back on the Spanish War
https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/looking-back-on-the-spanish-war/
—
[I’ll explain later]
Perhaps I’ve been doing it wrong all these years, but I’ve always thought in terms of “freeing” one’s mind rather than “controlling”. And the typical path to freeing one’s mind starts with things that make you go hmmm . . . !
—
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini#Rise_to_power
By the time he returned from service in the Allied forces of World War I, very little remained of Mussolini the socialist. Indeed, he was now convinced that socialism as a doctrine had largely been a failure. In 1917 Mussolini got his start in politics with the help of a £100 weekly wage (the equivalent of £6000 as of 2009) from the British security service MI5, to keep anti-war protestors at home and to publish pro-war propaganda. This help was authorized by Sir Samuel Hoare.[66] In early 1918 Mussolini called for the emergence of a man “ruthless and energetic enough to make a clean sweep” to revive the Italian nation.[67] Much later Mussolini said he felt by 1919 “Socialism as a doctrine was already dead; it continued to exist only as a grudge”.[68] On 23 March 1919 Mussolini re-formed the Milan fascio as the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento (Italian Combat Squad), consisting of 200 members.[69]
—
On the Samuel Hoare page it states:
Aged 34 at the time, Hoare joined the Army soon after the outbreak of the First World War. He was commissioned into the Norfolk Yeomanry as a temporary lieutenant on 17 October 1914.[14] To his disappointment, he was initially only a recruiting officer[10] and illness prevented him from serving at the front. He was promoted to temporary captain on 24 April 1915.[15]
While acting as a recruiting officer, he learnt Russian. In 1916, he was recruited by Mansfield Cumming to be the future MI6’s liaison officer with the Russian Intelligence service in Petrograd (now Saint Petersburg). He soon became head of the British Intelligence Mission to the Russian General Staff with the temporary rank of lieutenant-colonel.[10][16] In that post, he reported to the British government the death of Rasputin and apologised, because of the sensational nature of the event, for having written it in the style of the Daily Mail.[17]
In March 1917 he was posted to Rome, where he remained until the end of the war. His duties included helping to dissuade Italy from dropping out of the war.[10] In Italy, he met and recruited the former socialist leader Benito Mussolini on behalf of the British overseas intelligence service, which was then known as MI1(c). Newly-published documents show that Britain’s intelligence service helped Mussolini to finance his first forays into Italian politics as a right-wing politician. Hoping to keep Italy on its side in 1917, during the First World War, British intelligence gave Mussolini, a 34-year-old editor of a right-wing newspaper, £100 a week to keep his propaganda flowing.[18]
For his services in the war, Hoare was twice mentioned in despatches, appointed Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George (CMG) in 1917, and awarded the Orders of St Anne and St Stanislas of Russia, and of St Maurice and St Lazarus of Italy.[7]
(continued)
https://web.archive.org/web/20130908051300/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-italy
Recruited by MI5: the name’s Mussolini. Benito Mussolini
Documents reveal Italian dictator got start in politics in 1917 with help of £100 weekly wage from MI5
Tom Kington in Rome – 13 October 2009
History remembers Benito Mussolini as a founder member of the original Axis of Evil, the Italian dictator who ruled his country with fear and forged a disastrous alliance with Nazi Germany. But a previously unknown area of Il Duce’s CV has come to light: his brief career as a British agent. Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5.
For the British intelligence agency, it must have seemed like a good investment. Mussolini, then a 34-year-old journalist, was not just willing to ensure Italy continued to fight alongside the allies in the first world war by publishing propaganda in his paper. He was also willing to send in the boys to “persuade” peace protesters to stay at home. . . . As well as keeping the presses rolling at Il Popolo d’Italia, the newspaper he edited, Mussolini also told Hoare he would send Italian army veterans to beat up peace protesters in Milan, a dry run for his fascist blackshirt units.
“The last thing Britain wanted were pro-peace strikes bringing the factories in Milan to a halt. It was a lot of money to pay a man who was a journalist at the time, but compared to the £4m Britain was spending on the war every day, it was petty cash,” said Martland. . . .
After the armistice, Mussolini began his rise to power, assisted by electoral fraud and blackshirt violence, establishing a fascist dictorship by the mid-1920s.
‘For the British intelligence agency, it must have seemed like a good investment.’ no sht. notice how many of the recent ‘terror’ suspects were also heavily linked with mi5?
all the world really is a stage. and now we can actually see it being managed.
Christopher Hitchens in his introduction to Orwell in Spain (written May 2000) makes the point that the archives for both Franco and Stalin had been released; and therefore we had a much better idea of what was going on behind the scenes. But the really critical files are held by the British. It took 90 years to find out that British intelligence created the Fascist Mussolini, so imagine what they’ve still got hidden away. Perhaps one day we will find out what Samuel Hoare was doing it Petrograd in early 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_Revolution
The February Revolution, known in Soviet historiography as the February Bourgeois Democratic Revolution[2] and sometimes as the March Revolution,[3] was the first of two revolutions which took place in Russia in 1917.
The main events of the revolution took place in and near Petrograd (present-day Saint Petersburg), the then-capital of Russia, where long-standing discontent with the monarchy erupted into mass protests against food rationing on 23 February Old Style (8 March New Style).[4] Revolutionary activity lasted about eight days, involving mass demonstrations and violent armed clashes with police and gendarmes, the last loyal forces of the Russian monarchy. On 27 February O.S. (12 March N.S.) mutinous Russian Army forces sided with the revolutionaries. Three days later Tsar Nicholas II abdicated, ending Romanov dynastic rule and the Russian Empire. A Russian Provisional Government under Prince Georgy Lvov replaced the Council of Ministers of Russia.
The revolution appeared to break out without any real leadership or formal planning.[5] Russia had been suffering from a number of economic and social problems, which compounded after the start of World War I in 1914. Disaffected soldiers from the city’s garrison joined bread rioters, primarily women in bread lines, and industrial strikers on the streets. As more and more troops deserted, and with loyal troops away at the Front, the city fell into chaos, leading to the overthrow of the Tsar. In all, over 1,300 people were killed during the protests of February 1917.[6]
‘The revolution appeared to break out without any real leadership or formal planning.’
There’s the cover line. NOTHING that ever happens is not planned. The French Revolution was theirs as well. And now the covid-1984 one of the whole world’s minds, save a few who still have to put up with mask-wearing unthinking zombies everywhere, plus half the world still shut for no provable reason.
peace.
Orwell was a snitch for British intelligence. His book 1984 was not a warning,it was a manual for the ruling elite
https://bennorton.com/george-orwell-list-leftists-snitch-british-government/
The real question is – why?
I thought the answer was obvious. Because there are not many nutters denying the existence of all the other diseases.
diseases do not exist. the very notion is an intentional mind prison. https://youtu.be/5G0JyxoppI4
If I understand you, without the benefit of having watched the vid (yet), it’s sicknesses that people experience. If there’s something there causing those sicknesses, which often have similar or identical symptoms, Does that mean that there must be a common cause that is, specifically, a virus? That’s the vaccine industry’s position, conveniently. Sure there can common causes for sicknesses that have identifiable characteristics that logically we should be able to trace to common causes, but why do those causes <i>have to be</i> malevolent viruses out to get us? Is that the kind of home that the Creator created as part of his project earth, which was crowned by his human creation? Only if ‘he’ is cruel, would be my answer. I agree with Jon Rappoport that viruses (as virologists, including well meaning ones, would see them) are a profitable, convenient cover for toxic manmade chemicals and an out of control (neoliberal capitalism is, afterall, a completely freed capitalist class, something that is flipped when it comes to the people who are having all of their rights stripped and are being left with only obligations to the global biosecurity police State) ‘capitalist’ system.
I take it you agree with miasma theory of disease then ?
Hmmm. Guessing you missed her (third) paragraph, and the point of it:
“Now we may all agree some of these banned opinions sound odd, even ridiculous. But that’s not the point. Free speech includes the freedom to be odd, ridiculous and plain wrong. Once that right is gone – free speech no longer exists.”
To recap purposes of free speech (no, it’s not “So I’ll get to speak, too, when it’s my turn”, which is the vacuous reason formerly broadcast to the unwashed.): It’s because (1) Truth is never finally settled or even determinable; it is only adopted by majorities, and quiesces, for varying periods of time. This recognition is a basis for the practices of science, democracy, and law. (2) Expression to an audience, of anything, should be widely permitted, for societal and personal mental health. Look no further than contemporary art. (3) We in the audience are adults now, and can make our own judgments about someone else’s speech.
Sorry to correct your statement, but you confused truth and opinion. Truth does exist, and so does opinion. Most of science is about opinion, not truth. Hence why science keeps growing and evolving, reflecting the steady journey of opinion towards the truth.
The body of scientific thought is akin to religious belief. In the past it seems to have been individuals working on their own that made any progress. This is badly written but you get the drift… maybe.
So this relegious belief has made certain progress such as aeroplanes, putting a man on the moon, treating effectively various infectious diseases, invented refrigerators, to just quote a random sample, and all this as a religious belief. I think you may agree that you are the one who has beliefs, not nescessarily mistaken, but somewhat flawed.
The statement above confuses science with technology. Science is the enquiry into the causes of effects observed in nature. It normally occurs through a process of discovery. To aid discovery, natural conditions are often recreated in controlled settings. This is what is called experimentation. Technology is the recreation of effects in nature, after the causes have been discovered. It normally occurs through a process of invention. It’s important to distinguish between technology and science, before we can proceed to discuss opinions and facts, as I do in my comment further down this thread.
You are of course right and sorry for being sloppy. However discoveries are made often nowadays through scientific methods and are then up scaled by technology.
I can assure you I am on your side. Science was my first love (and music) and I am well aware of what it has brought to the world. People like Tesla are my heroes but my point was that once the institution of science latches on to a particular theory it can be difficult to shake it off – even when new evidence shows it to be faulty.
In this way I think it is like religion. peace 🙂
and as has been proven time and again in the past. herschel measured the sun to be 3 million miles away.
Like everything science is liable to fraud and corruption. But you are wrong, the scientific method is not the same as expressing an opinion. Science depends on testing a hypothesis based on an observation. If you can associate a certain disease with a microorganism then by careful experementation you can show for example that all cases of tuberculosis are associated with a germ called mycobacterium. This is not an opinion, it is an proven fact. From then you can also devise a treatment specific to TB that does not really treat, for example, bacterial pneumonia.
Science of course is not perfect and there have been great mistakes in the past, either deliberate or intentional, but to dismiss science in the way you do, seems a bit strange.
Science is the enquiry into the causes of effects observable in nature. What are surmised as being causes, are normally a matter of opinion, not fact. Sometimes it is right opinion, and sometimes it is wrong opinion. When it is wrong opinion, scientists down the ages then debunk the explanations that the scientists who came before them put forward as causes for effects observed in nature. Isaac Newton being debunked by Einstein is a good example of this. Facts on the other hand, are self-evident, and are accepted by all involuntarily. For instance, the statement that the sun rises is a fact. It is self-evident and forcibly accepted by all. But to say that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west is an expression of opinion. East and West are not self-evident facts, but matters of opinion – the type of opinion called “convention”. Something similar happens in the realm of science.
Science is a tool that can be misused. It was never meant to be an opinion that can be either randomly right or wrong, it is exactly a method to reduce this opinion part of the process into repeatedly provable hypotheses.
The pages of many blog sites are populated by people who think exactly that because they can express an opinion, they can decide whether the scientific facts presented are right or wrong. Like any discipline people need to be trained to interpret science.
No, this insight may rumble youtube’s bad answer (like yours) and its reason:
“Our dangers, as it seems to me, are not from the outrageous but from the conforming; not from those who rarely and under the lurid glare of obloquy upset our moral complaisance, or shock us with unaccustomed conduct, but from those, the mass of us, who take their virtues and their tastes, like their shirts and their furniture, from the limited patterns which the market offers.”
~~ Judge Learned Hand
“Limited patterns.” An unquestioned and barely explained pattern –template– of ubiquitous ” moral complaisance” has been foisted upon us, with increasingly (widely reported) suspect data, and globally no less.
Simply to ban all public CORE questioning of that is not only even more suspect, but a clear call to action.
And the criminalization of that and all real speculation about the bug, is what calls for a real review of what is being done to us by the agencies mandating stuff.
Pretty clear, the logical and reasonable basis for asking: “…the question is why?”
Any case, it’s clear to anyone who isn’t a troll or agent (provocateur). Anyone, at all, who isn’t, should be questioning it. Which is the unstated point. Unstated, perhaps, because it’s SO obvious.
Right? Simple “either/or” scenario.
(Almost like Dubya’s simple Doctrine: “yer either with us or agin us”. Except, obviously, he rarely applied that to simple logic or basic decency, like this. Not if he could help it. But perhaps you still can?)
To norm Corin and John Ervin
Yes of course. But nobody nowadays has prevented fools from making statements that are totally irrational in a public forum but if you ask a private enterprise to publish this inanity it may become necessary for them to refuse to publish it. The debate about freedom of speech in this age of everyone seeking entitlement to express unfounded views on anything beyond their comprehension has led to this muddled thinking . After all you can very happily express all these views here and get patted on the back and upvoted for these very same comments that you have been denied on YouTube.
ORAGE wrote: “But nobody nowadays has prevented fools from making statements in a public forum”
OK, so now we’re on the same page, at least: you’re referencing Bill Gates and Tedros at WHO, right?
Or just CDC and Gavin Newsom, maybe?
Orage,
If you accept that not all science/Doctors agree. Then I hope we can also agree that over hundreds of years opinions and practices change and that without questioning the given this could/would not have been able to happen. These challenges have not always come from trained and indoctrinated experts but by keen and inquisitive amateurs.
Long ago it would have been factual that any Doctor or surgeon was just as likely to kill you as to cure you. Modern medicine has many mistakes and also has high casualty rates. But and this is key; this does not prevent Dr,s/ Scientist,s from often insisting that they know best. Because they have done the training and convincing patients that what they are doing is well researched and indeed safe. Should we just comply and hand over any personal right to reject their narrative and choose our own opinions or treatments.
If people wish to question what they are told and follow their own research. Should this be allowed?. Or should some be overridden because anothers opinion is backed up by a qualifications and therefore everything they say holds higher status. What is our right to question them or any other narrative i.e Covid19 ?.
Who should hold if anyone the right to remove a persons right to question or hold opinions based on their own understanding in following their own research. To come to their own conclusions and not to take the route they are being told to take. Surely it is and surely should be a given basic right of the indevidual. Once you remove this right you are are taking away an individuals liberty and freedom to choose their own life path and this is a very slippery and problematic slope.
What about those who wish to follow alternative treatment for illnesses,s; either for themselves or their children. What about those who wish to follow particular diets etc, or to choose an alternative life path. Say to home educate their children. or a vegan diet.
There have been several cases over the last few years where parents of children have wished to seek treatments for their children that the N.H.S has deemed unsuitable. This has become increasingly complex and caused great trauma for all concerned. Leading to court cases and parents fleeing the country and hunted down like fugitives. And it is increasingly the state that is given the ultimate rights. Is this right do you think?. How much power do we wish to hand to the state and do we really trust them to make the best decisions for us, or do we feel uncomfortable in
giving away what until fairly recently was a given right of the citizen.
If for example, i was to say that garlic is one of nature most potent antibiotics and a great deal safer and kinder on the body then man made antibiotics. and that salt is a great deal safer and more effective then man made antiseptic. Should I be allowed too put this up on to Facebook etc. Should I be allowed to offer this information and make these choices for my own health. Should I be allowed to have my own informed opinions or should I be fact checked and found wrong by face book or YouTube, or the state and overruled. Because their facts are right and mine are wrong. Where is this beginning to lead us?. Is this the way we really do want society to go in. Do we really want eventually to see all of our personal opinions overridden and all our personal freedoms eroded. To allow are liberties to be taken away from us. For our own safety because big brother knows best what is good for us. At a time when it has never been easier to access information and to do as much research and to inform ourselves as much we feel we choose/wish to do. Is it not our right to do so and to formulate our own opinions.
There is no denying the truth of some of what you say, but
“Modern medicine has many mistakes and also has high casualty rates.”
I hope not. In any case I hope that the balance is generally towards the good and that the mistakes and your high casualty rates do not outweigh these benefits, otherwise our governements are wasting a lot of money.
There is also no denying that some natural products are highly effective and some extracts are not only used to treat malaria, but even cancer and heart disease. But the improvement comes from systematic studies that prove the efficacy in a reproducable way. Otherwise herbs and others can sometimes also cause harm if they are used incorrectly.
Nobody is trying to force people to have treatment. But the exceptions throughout the history of organised societies has been that civil liberties also have some responsability. Where contagious disease is concerned, it is customary to enforce restrictive laws because it is not just that you would be a danger to yourself but also to others.
Forcing families to give thier children treatment is obviously a rather serious interference by the state but again there are reasons behind it that are not just medical or scientific, but ethical and consideration for the rights of children. But that is a different matter.
Thank you for your reply.
On your point of societal responsibility I do agree that this is and should be collective. But this can be served by basic good manners and hygiene being adhered to; i.e putting ones hand over ones mouth to sneeze, cough, yawn etc. Washing hands etc when preparing food or when returning home. I have twice recently been coughed on or sneezed on by mask wearers. Presumably believing that the mask is invincible and so these good manners are unnecessary But these are based on an understanding and a responsibility of not passing ones bugs to another. . The idea that the whole population should be put in to lock down and quarantined seems extreme and likely causing far more harm then good.
It would be interesting to be able to compare modern medicine with the herbal and wise woman culture of the past. I suspect that it probably was as effective in its application as modern medicine and likely had far fewer side effects. Then as now health is greatly enhanced by good diet, clean air sunshine, clean water adequate housing and a sense of well being.
As to your point about the balance being generally towards the good. I am not so sure that this is the case sadly. The GP surgeries are constantly overburdened and GP’s often state that they feel pressured to hand out prescriptions for random and inconclusive ailments. It would seem that people on the whole are generally much more likely to be ill now. As a child most people I knew visited the GP’s as little as they possibly could and still turned to home remedies rather then this dependency on prescriptions and pharmacy drugs that has become so normalized today. I am not sure that people are as healthy or robust as they were then. Immunity seams to be compromised more and cancers are becoming increasingly common place. And yes when it comes to N.H.S funding I do believe that a lot of money is being wasted. A lot going straight into the hands of big Pharmaceuticals for medications that may well be completely unnecessary and possibly doing great harm. Medications that have not been properly assessed are expensive under researched and over hyped.
As you say herbs can be harmful if miss-used but again in the past the knowledge was much greater and doses of any medicine is always of great importance. Most inroads in to medicines were and still are reliant on the likes of digitalis etc. Interestingly most herbs have compounds that offset the harmful aspects within the medicinal properties. i.e meadow sweet contains mucilage’s that protects the stomach from the irritants in salicylic acid. A balance within nature not replicated by the more aggressive and artificial modern cousin. I think the main difference now is that people tend to put far more faith in to science and modern medicine then may be is deserved.
Kathy
Thanks for your answer. It is not in dispute that herbs are useful medicinally but science and medicine work by standardising and understanding how they work and how they can be optimised. But we must not loose the wood for the trees. The fact that some pharmaceutical companies make vast profits and occasionally produce dangerous medications does not discount the efforts of the others doing good. Life expectancy has steadily increased over the years due to many factors and also diseases that used to kill such as infections and others are well controlled but this means that cancer and heart disease become the major killers and medicine tries to find cures for them.
Just to give you an example of some advances. In the 1950’s childhood leukaemia was invariable fatal kit is now curable in 95% of cases. This was not due to garlic or herbs but interestingly, periwinkle, which contains a potent component called vincristine, which helped a great deal in this. You wouldn’t get far if you went and chewed on periwinkle, it might even kill you.
You see it is not either or, it is both.
I mentioned life expectancy earlier. This has been steadily increasing overall but has now stalled since about 2010. Big factors in this is the economic downturn and probably other factors, but of course nutrition is central to this.
In Russia during the Yeltsin years the life expectancy of men fell by about 15 years just because of this.
So let us work together and not throw the baby with the bath water. Most scientists and doctors are not evil money grabbers.
Also I agree with you that surgeries are overburdened because people have lost self reliance and try to find a manic medicine rather than weather out a cold with a bit of chamomile tea.
Hi orage.
Thank you for your reply
I completely agree that throwing babies out with the bath water is always a bad move. Of course I would not dispute that some modern medicine is good and certainly useful .
What does concern me though is an increasing trend towards the unquestionability of modern medicine and sciences. It is increasingly becoming a modern heresy to debate on such subjects and yet it is questioning the norm and the status quo that has led to advances in our understandings of how the world works. Mind and body interrelate in ways that we still don’t really understand and to dismiss interconnectivity and potentials of holistic treatments by blocking debate seems to insist a dissonant disconnect. This does not feel to me to be a good direction to be taking and ultimately can only lead to set backs for our future understandings. It feels wrong to block debate and not to allow free discussion and theorizing over Covid19 is an example.
Interestingly as far as our perceptions on life expectancy go
I knew a priest who had spent a great many years researching parish records around the country. Based on his studies he informed me that the theory that we live longer now then in the past to be inaccurate. He was adamant that the average age of death remained fairly static. He maintained that the extreme drop in age of death was due to industrialization and the big move from rural in to urban factories. The main observation was that records used to determine this low death rate were taken not from parish records but from urban factory ones and skewed the narrative. People were forced out of their rural heartlands and in to greater servitude and closer confinement in slums and greater dangers from disease, industrial accidents and illnesses due to pollution and toxins in and surrounding factories . As with everything. Nothing occurs in a vacuum and all things are linked. I would personally add that the enclosure systems therefor played a huge role in this.
It is great that the resurgence of exploration in to herbalism kick started more research and interest in plants medicinal properties and as you mention: led to the explorations and research that enabled periwinkle to become so effective. It was I think developed after discovering its use as a tonic tea in Eastern Europe. As another example Snow drops have always been associated in myth and legend with long memory and clarity of thought. The fact that Reminyl derived from galntamine is now being used for Alzheimers shows how important plants are and how much knowledge there must have once been. The main reason that a lot of ancient herb lore was lost in Europe. Was due to the vilification of the herbalists and healers. A new age dawning and a censoring out of the old wisdom’s. The people that used to seek the aid of wise women/Shaman were encouraged to fear them. This attitude became part of the Witch hunts that swept across Europe from the 16th century lasting for almost 200 years. It is sad that the birth of modern medicine almost certainly did play some role in this vilification. Explaining why so very little of this wisdom survived.. The old and ancient wisdom’s were censored and the midwives and the wise women were the ones thrown out with the bath water. We have lost so much knowledge and understanding it may take several lifetimes if ever to regain. This I guess loops us back to the original point of the article. It is a worrying trend when governments, organizations and now various internet platforms wish to stifle freedom to express and share information and theories. If something is deemed not to conform. Who and how is this to be policed. What purpose does it serve and for whom. Control and censorship often go hand in hand with arrogance and folly. This is why I think we should all worry about the shutdown of free speech. Throughout history. It never bodes well.
As you say we should all work together and of course lots of scientists are doing things for all the right reasons. We are all, regardless of our levels of understanding. Seeking out greater understanding and insight into this wonderful world we all find ourselves inhabiting.
Healthy skepticism and curiosity of mind are of such great importance. We allow these things to be censored at our peril. As someone once put it. It is the ability to always explore the possibility and not be focused only on the probability that leads us on to greater insight.
Orage, what you must do is apply scientific method to your reasoning.
People are not simply “denying” the existence of COVID-19, they’re presenting rationales for why they don’t accept what we’re being told about it or the alleged virus causing it. You must argue with their rationale, not simply the fact of denial.
The most compelling reason against COVID-19 is that there is no evidence for it found in any scientific paper. That’s pretty compelling, no? Its existence must be shown using specified procedures and there is no evidence of this having been done.
— No evidence of isolation of the virus
— No evidence of the alleged virus causing infectious disease
If you find scientific papers that clearly show isolation and that the alleged virus causes infectious disease, please let me know. I’m all ears. I always keep an open mind. I hope you can do the same.
Here’s my rationale if your mind is open and interested enough to have a look:
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/blog/coronavirus-hoax-jan-2020
You asked me to comment on your link above:
I
I can deny Jesus ever existed NOW, but would have been put to death for saying so once upon a time…
Jesus himself was supposedly put to death, why pick on him?
Well Orage, It’s always the one that’s cock sure and smarter than everyone else who wakes up alone, handcuffed to a wharf, covered in sugar syrup and chicken feathers with the tide coming in.If you can present me with one peer reviewed paper that clearly identifies SARS CoV-2 by satisfying even just the isolation and purification postulates, I will let you take a needle full of genetically modified organisms of your choice and just shoot it right into my veins. That’s how confident I am that you have less than zero idea what you’re talking about.
Good point. I tell you what, as you are an intelligent person who is very interested in your own well being, I think you are also capable of finding this out for yourself. My past experience is that if I spend time finding you the evidence, you will argue that the evidence is not to be believed because there is a widespread conspiracy amongst scientists and doctors who are governed by a secret cabal spreading false molecular misinformation. Only you can convince yourself, so happy googling.
LOL.
Judy Mikovits is still there with her Wuhan lab nonsense – that’s cos she’s controlled opposition whose purpose is to divert, mislead and undermine the case for no virus just like Judy Wood’s purpose (Where did the towers go?) is to divert and mislead people into believing the nasty, toxic dust.
For those interested presentation of 9/11 and COVID-19: The Parallels.
Summary below:
1. Trauma-based Mind Control Psychological Operations
2. Problem > Reaction > Solution
3. Exercises / drills
4. Other similar types of events – 9/11 – other bombings of evacuated areas, COVID-19 – other fake pandemics/epidemics
5. Presages
6. Science doesn’t add up
7. Two major propaganda streams (one directed at masses, one directed at skeptics)
8. Reality very, very different from propaganda
9. Mini-propaganda streams to divert and mislead
10. Controlled opposition used to undermine, eg, COVID – Judy Mikovits, 9/11 – Judy Wood
10. Nonsense miracle survivors
11. Unconvincing injured/patients
12. Underneath the propaganda they really push it in our faces
Judy Milkovits is not controlled opposition, merely at the uncontrolled end of the covid-19 denial fringe.
What makes you say she’s not controlled opposition?
Hang on. Do you believe in the virus? If so, then, by definition, you will think she’s not controlled opposition.
Do you believe in the virus?
Really belief does not come into this, Do you believe in the sun?
And wether you believe in it or not it will get you if you come into close proximity, so does it matter?
The Bogeyman Bug. It even lurks under your beds, children. And it will get you if you misbehave. It loves to eat small children. Especially ones who ask questions that are too grown up for young little minds.
Remember Jimmy, next door? He asked questions, and look what happened to HIM! He was the first child for miles around to die of Covid19, just hours after his terrible bicycle accident. Now there are others. They were ALL “just asking questions” too!
(I’m quite certain I saw just that as an early ’60s episode of Twilight Zone. Unless of course I’m now in it. On a loop! LOL)
Jimmy’s whole problem was not wether (sic) he believed or disbelieved, but simply that he came into close proximity. Right after his terrible bicycle crash. But at least he stopped asking all those questions.
The Bogeyman Bug* got him, just as it will all children who ask too many questions. Right after his terrible accident when he came into close proximity.
(*Aka the “Magic Virus” to adults.)
Good for you if it makes you happy. Enjoy.
Au contraire, it’s Jimmy who could have used that pat on his head. But sadly it’s too late, he came into close proximity!
RIP Jimmy, you’d still be with us but you we’re too oft a Covid-questioner.
Death, last stop on the road of “social distancing”!
So hilarious, John. I was having a chuckle to myself over the reply I was just about to make to Orage:
“Yes, it will … and so will the bogeyman” …
… but you beat me to it!
It’s funny, the word hasn’t come to my mind for a very long time … but it obviously came to yours too.
Petra
I shall answer your other post later but for now just want to say that the attitude that something will not hurt you because you do not believe in it’s potency is common amongst fanatics especially those with a religious zeal.
As to your Occam’s razor website, lots of cherry picking of evidence, lots of reference to unknown commentators in websites such as OG and do on. If I am to answer your question above about a proper scientific debate we have to establish what is the appropriate method of proof? If for example we start with my submission of the scientific evidence you ask for and your answer then is that it being published by say the Lancet, is no evidence at all, because the Lancet is part of the over engulfing conspiracy, then there is no point of me pursuing trying to convince you. What I mean to say is that I have been there before, we need a common base to discuss rationally and all our referencing hopefully done through scientific quotes and not heresay from various non qualified self appointed experts.
We are I hope after all seeking the truth?
It’s true, Orage, that the people I quote on virology do not give their full names and credentials and I wish that were not the case. The thing is even though they don’t give their names what they say seems extremely reasonable to me.
This is why it’s good to present evidence from a number of different angles which I do.
OK, so why don’t you present me with the evidence for the virus causing infectious disease. Let’s forget about isolation of the virus, let’s just worry about the evidence for the alleged SARS-CoV-2 causing infectious disease because I think you’ll agree that even if there is evidence of the virus being isolated that is insufficient for proving COVID-19 and that is our main concern.
Thank you . There is some progress here in your acknowledgement. You have not, however, answered my other question, what is acceptable evidence in this scientific debate? The reason for discounting anonymous evidence is simply that it is not provable or falsifiable. It is merely an expression of opinion. If you believe that someone is plausible but dies not present their result by first of all presenting their credentials and then presenting data in an analysable way, submitted for critique by peer review then it is not scientific evidence. But I would also like to make another point. Sadly not everything in science and medicine is a provable certainty and reliance has to be made on common accepted practice and also a body of collective experience. Evidence base has also to take account of these. Not all scientists agree and not all doctors conform to one single way of treatment except where there is a high index of evidence. But sadly non expert bloggers have now assumed that google acquired knowledge and demand for scientific evidence is all they need to wade into highly complex subjects, with little scientific knowledge. This leads to obfuscation and endless nonsensical debates . I do not wish to enter this unless we agree on these basic facts otherwise we will all be wasting our time.
The most important worry I have about this debate is that while we are all argumuing, our governments are introducing the most wide sweeping laws, in some cases increasing their power and corruptly changing the economy. Some of the arguments produced here actually help people like Cummings and Trump.
You speak too much in generalities that superficially may sound good, Orage, but, in fact, your argument is facile and invalid.
Firstly, I’d like to reject your claim of my cherry-picking. Being a cherry-picker is so outside my personality. I like to keep all the available evidence in my mind constantly and ensure that all available evidence fits my hypothesis. How I feel I’m different from most people is not so much even that I really want the truth but that I am not wedded to a belief – I didn’t think that would be an unusual trait but after I started on this psyop journey it seems it is. I am not invested in my belief and I always want to ensure I’m not saying things that are false and getting it wrong … and if someone or something shows me that I am I’ll acknowledge and change my mind. Jonathan Swift said:
That adage makes perfect sense to me. Why would anyone want to continue being wrong? Isn’t it so much more sensible to recognise one’s error and make oneself right again? I simply do not understand why others don’t incorporate that adage into their being too.
It is rather you who are doing the cherry-picking. What you have done is fix on the fact that I’ve used people whose names and credentials are not available and used this fact as if it undermines the credibility of what they say and is an example of cherry-picking.
Firstly, it’s important to look at their argument. What do you say about their argument, Orage? And how does it compare to what the official side of the story is saying? You need to assess their argument, not their credentials or lack of name. There is nothing I’m aware of that attempts to debunk what these people are saying so I simply cannot comment on what other credentialled people might say about what they’re saying. If there was anything I assure you I’d be assessing it for its validity. It’s always good to have argument / counter argument and then another counter argument but all I can find is argument / counter argument. If you can find a second counter argument I’d be most grateful to read it. All I can say is that it sounds reasonable. Whether something is provable or falsifiable has nothing to do with the source of who’s saying it, it is to do with the nature of the claims made and I see nothing about the claims made that is any less credible than what I see in scientific papers.
Secondly, you do not consider all the evidence I have presented – this is where you cherry-pick big time. Even if there were scientific papers that showed that the virus has been isolated and causes infectious disease that is not enough to prove pandemic and the validity of the measures implemented. We need to look at all the evidence and weigh it up.
The thing is we don’t need to only rely on scientific material to make our case and – in fact – we shouldn’t do that because it is not sufficient. We need to look at the whole jigsaw.
You shouldn’t make assumptions about people, Orage. When we were at school, judging information by its source was drummed into us, wasn’t it? However, I’ve since learnt that no source whatsoever is particularly reliable. It’s always about piecing all the bits of information together and seeing, as a whole, what hypothesis they align with best. I don’t reject information because it comes from the Lancet or from the News of the World or whatever. I consider every bit of information as being part of a jigsaw and seeing how it fits.
I have made my case with numerous pieces of information to show that psyop is favoured over real pandemic. Why don’t you just make your case with whatever information you think supports it – scientific papers from the Lancet or whatever. If that doesn’t suit you then perhaps you have a better suggestion.
You can also attempt debunking of my other points of course.
Let us introduce some real science here. This paper published in Nature from a collaborative multicentre group sets to prove that SARS-2 is the causative agent for Covid-19. Can we discuss any flaws in this paper?
https://www.nature.com/articles/423240a.pdf
Byootiful, Orage. Love it. My eyes widened when I saw “… Koch’s postulates as modified by Rivers for viral diseases …” I thought, “What have we here? Will my non-existent scientific abilities be up to debunking this paper, assuming it can even be debunked – perhaps I’ve got it all wrong. Hopefully, virusguy,Tony, is still around and I can call on him.” But quickly I breathed a sigh of relief. They are shameless in their scientific fraud, Orage, they really are. It’s comical. It’s just like the complete nonsense of the NIST report which is based purely in speculation and theory that isn’t even based on any kind of physical reality.
It’s glaring out at you, Orage, but you don’t see it.
This is the problem, right here:
“We inoculated two macaques with Vero-cellcultured SCV isolated from a fatal SARS case, and monitored their clinical signs, virus excretion and antibody response.”
Where’s the evidence of the isolation from the fatal SARS case?
Seen it all before, Orage. There’s another paper that presents a case in a similar manner but don’t have time right now to link to it. This is sufficient though.
I take it you are a world famous molecular scientists. Funny it slipped past the editors of Nature.
I’m grateful to you, Orage, because you have said things that have prompted me to refine my case for psyop, however, I can see there is no point in further dialogue as I simply cannot see any logic in your response.
My point is that I am NOT a molecular scientist … or anything like it, however, that poses no difficulty in determining a problem with the paper you linked to because the unscientificness of omitting reference to how the virus was isolated from its original source is so very obvious to lay person and scientist alike.
And yes it is very funny that it slipped past the editors of Nature. I just checked and find this paper refers to the alleged 2003 SARS so not entirely relevant to this alleged SARS but it’s absolutely PERFECT to add to my case that this psyop follows on from the 2003 SARS psyop. I shall add it to the paper written by health writer, Steven Ransom, Cough and Awe, on the 2003 SARS. Don’t you love the title?
So the 2003 paper is exactly like this 2020 paper, Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS and SARS in a non-human primate model in omission of reference to how the virus was isolated from its original source, a “German traveler”.
So thanks, Orage, and it’s a shame we can’t have a meaningful dialogue but you’ve certainly helped me in refining my case, even if that wasn’t your intention.
Ouch Petra. That hurt. Well spotted. The paper is actually from May 2003 and as you point quite rightly about SARS not Covid-19. Totally my mistake for trying a quick answer. But I will send you more reference to examine but I have to be more thorough this time so it may take a while. By the way the paper is correct for SARS .
Orage, we’re talking at cross purposes. They’re all a continuum: SARS 2003, COVID-19, Ebola, MERS, Zika – it’s all the same phoney fake show.
So it’s now you who are the microbiologist, Orage. How can you assert the paper is correct without the correct scientific background.
As I say, what I point out is not the kind of error only spotted by a microbiologist. Anyone with a modicum of reason and judgement can work it out.
There is no reference to how the virus was isolated from the original source either in the 2003 paper you point to or the 2020 paper I point to.
And Petra
I started conversing with you on the assumption that you are open minded but I have now changed my opinion.
That is because you were seduced by controlled opposition, easily recognisable in the name of FLAXGIRL…
Think about it…
Or, should i walk you down the garden path of human distraction from PHYSICS! EIGHTY ONE STEEL COLUMNS & 2 SECS. FREEFALL … and Petra called Bill Binney out,
As controlled opposition, without even EVER having heard of him, or his name even, s3ince 2001 onwards!! Let alone, WTC7 and its’ contents….
Only a year ago came the confirmation, seriously brother, take professional ad-VICE… Petra/\Flaxgirl is loaded with A.i analysing… apply occahemmms razor sHAARP,
Analytical skills … time for a clean shave &
Say no more!
so basically no evidence at all is your proof of covid19. it is always the way with the injection cult who are fraudsters. they dont want to expose their ‘studies’ to scrutiny.
Awesome link below, Petra, not surprising we would both think “bogeyman” in synchronicity.
That’s no accident, that’s synchronicity! Eureka.
But beyond all that, the word itself has truly made the rounds for centuries, and this piece places it in a permutation of one kind or another, everywhere on the globe, for ages without end. I researched it last year, but more today, so fascinating (and so on topic, notably). It’s one of the most interesting words in any and all languages, simply because it has very close “relatives” everywhere, all continents. It has the same root as “bug” (aka, goblin), pookah (“Harvey”), pixie, bugbear, ad infinitum (seriously).
It makes the term “bogeyman bug” oddly redundant:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogeyman
Thanks for that, John.
Yes, it’s a panglobal word just like the current disease. 🙂
John, ffs, don ‘t get distracted by this psyop persona, please…
The attempts to seduce from this persona, were obvious.
What seems like, many decades ago.
Monsieur Jenkins posted: “John, ffs, don ‘t get distracted by this psyop persona, please…
The attempts to seduce from this persona, were obvious.
What seems like, many decades ago.”
Really? You would actually stoop to this: self-deprecation?
Not to worry, I appreciate the heads up (and at such cost to your public image too) but I was already warned about your “psyop persona” many moons ago.
But, really, for you to have to resort to the most transparent trollerie — this crafty reverse psychology of actually accusing yourself — is maybe “the most unkind cut of all”. Even in our Age of the Psyop.
But, mission accomplished: I will follow your advice and ignore you going forward.
This is brill. I don’t know about Judy Mikovits but I have noticed a lot of articles surfacing recently questioning aspects of the covid story but asserting that for sure it’s real and dangerous.
Thanks, Richard. Yep, it’s a typical propaganda strategy. Put out all different streams of propaganda … but always with the underlying implication that there is a virus!
It’s identical to the strategy for 9/11 – all different streams of propaganda … but always with the underlying implication that 3,000 people died and 6,000 were injured!
Exactly the same.
It’s odd, but the morning of September 11 ’01 I was walking through the door at a new job and the person I was reporting to was on the phone. When he got off he, Jason, told me it was a relative who was calling him from a staircase of one of the Towers while they were being evacuated. He sounded like he believed it, too. What are the chances?
What was odd during that week was how much obvious, blatant buncombe was mixed in all the reportage, quite like what we’ve stepped in these past few months.
But I had called family to wake them up (6am PST) and while on the phone the other Tower was “hit”.
So I had witnesses when I said, without taking another breath, “This is SO obviously some inside job!”
But crisis acting must be a big growth industry. Booming, right about now.
I’m going to cash in, then, put out an ad, “CRISIS ACTORS WANTED”.
And a name for the new band.
It seems incredible to me that a very small number of people worked out inside job more or less instantaneously but then at the time I knew nothing. Now, of course, as soon as I heard about the alleged pandemic I thought psyop instantly and my suspicions were immediately confirmed upon consulting Wikipedia and seeing nonsense about Chinese cobras and many-banded kraits. They really do have a laugh and I can’t help laughing too.
Good luck, John. I don’t think you’d get very far. It’d be interesting to be someone who figured everything out without saying a word to give yourself away and then decided to infiltrate THEM.
I’d love to know if and how many people were evacuated from the towers or whether they pulled it off completely without evacuation by ensuring no people in the buildings prior – I just don’t see how they could do that though. I’ve never seen any photos of actual evacuation so perhaps they did it without – not that they couldn’t fake those up anyway (but then they’d do the right thing and give it away with obvious fakery).
Or perhaps there are evacuation photos?
Just came across this fabulous quote on twitter.
Theodore Dalrymple, British cultural critic, on propaganda:
Oh yeah, right, just communist societies. I wonder if this guy is controlled opposition pushing out the truth as they are wont to do in their own special way with the slight twist that it only happens in “communist societies”.
It’s similar to an internet search on the term controlled opposition. Most prominent are references to an alleged quote from Lenin:
Yeah, like Lenin invented controlled opposition.
I like what Gore Vidal had to say on how the Russians knew what was going on because they, unlike us, knew how to read their propaganda … at least in Soviet times. This is a quote from him from an article but there is a better one in a YouTube video that I didn’t keep a record of. Damn. In the video he talked about how they used to turn it upside down and read one corner first and then another … or something like that.
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/times-cries-eke-buries-al-gore/
In the old Soviet Union, various Russian friends were often surprisingly well informed about the world despite the fact that their view of it was largely shaped by their New York Times, Pravda. When asked how do you find out what’s really going on, they would give secret smiles: “You must know how to read Pravda.” Now the USSR is gone and we are on our own, trying to sort out our Pravda‘s often contradictory mendacities, on such lurid view a few weeks ago in an edition that contained three or four not exactly synoptic tales of the findings of a “ballot review conducted for a consortium of news organizations.”
Your free to have your opinion but Youtube doesn’t have to as a business share your content. Just the way any busy can refuse you. Those are the rules of our society youtube isn’t a right it is a business. Sure Nazi’s have a right to say what they want but we should give them as much coverage of the media as people who just want everyone to get along.
What you say gets parroted often but it’s wrong.
There are several laws and conventions stating that if you provide a service and you have an effective monopoly, you must provide the service equally to all comers. Common Carriage is one.
If you run the only ferry across a river in a district you are NOT within your legal right to deny someone a journey or to charge one person more than another for the same service. Even if it’s your ferry and your work you cannot charge one butcher more to transport his sheep than another.. nor refuse him because you don’t like his politics.
In USA there were all kinds of laws for the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) that underscored the laws that the PUBLIC airwaves belonged to “We, the People” . Now, in a matter of ten or twenty years, that’s not even told as a fairy tale to schoolchildren.
Winona LaDuke, Nader’s Native American VP candidate when he ran for President in 2000, said on Pacifica Radio in 2004, simply and memorably, “This is all just about protecting the public.”
She had still not seen the memo from corporate America: Vanderbilt had been asked in the Gilded Age by a reporter, “But how will this benefit the public, Mr. Vanderbilt?”
And that Robber Baron had an answer that is the signature response of our power elite and its piratical membership, “Public be damned.”
Yeah, I am more surpriced that people didnt see this coming, like its an shock, ugh, my answer is, what rock have you then been lying under the last milleniums, there is nothing new, only the layout, the rest is as it always have been, control the narrative, create consensusses, fake history, lie, steel and cheet the rest, like creating moooney out of thin air with an fical solidy comparable to an brass fart, etc, etc, and this latest stunts about fighting this big tech comps are just an kabuki theater, since I already know the outcome, witch is nothing is going to change, since people in general are just plain idiots, I am a bit sorry for that statement but its true, the human race is in decline and have been so for centurys to the peek idiocy we have to day.
As an old time eh… conspiracy tin foil hate wearer, this scamdemic was just a childs play, so easy to debunk it hurts, all tho I did not say that nobody died, but from that on to this, they lied about everything, and people stil dont get it when I say they lie about everything, they indeed do that, lie about every bloody thing, everything incl reality and space/time witch is secondary, consciousness is fundamental, not matter or time, they are just effects.
This cencure, stacking of seaches in various seach engines I even warned you about for years ago, but nobody cares because the issues was not that “populare”, but for me, an person whom grew up within and from having an hughe library, it was glaringly obvious, to the present cencure of sites and I will just give you one ex. like the leauge of BreitFartlingas an site I despice thruout, but as an hard core realist I would never advocate cencure, but when the same shithole is whining about Goolag, why dont we debate the stickt cencure regime BreitFart/reddit did them selfs, they kicked me our I think almost from the begining and I never whent back, and I have no sumphaty what so ever with them, but again, like porn in an gass station, its your choice, thats it, dont go there if it anoys you or provoces, etc, its that simple.
I like the analogy of the Platos cave, people think its much better this days, its not, and I can provoce a lot of people in an instant, link to writings that will change but I dont, and thats because you are not that well versed, nor knowledgable as you think you are, because some consensusses is easy to rip to shreads, others sticks like clued into your perseption or mind, and even when most of this are lies, faked or simply hidden, the most comon way of creating consensusses is simply to cutt it out of exsitence and its not known because its simply not wrtten about or is hidden/ignored
So, to run this rant off, I will again recomend to read an book, or hear it, witch is populare this days and I do recomend to do that, and I recomend this not to be abou the past, do differentiate, but about the present and the future, as an warning, because for me, this is the begining of an era witch we just have seen the star off, and the totalitarianism of what comes as an result of the present, I usualy dont do predictions, but if I use all what I have seen the last decades it can be summed up on one book, not Orwells 1984, that was in 84, but the real evil of how an system that crushes everything in its path, and also to remind some of the people whom sees just one side, as they di this days, when some are preocupyed with demonising others, and ignores the faults of their belifs, because they chouse to not to see or hear.
The book is, Children of the Arbat, by Anatoly Rybakov.
And I am so mean I dont blame others, I blame us, we sleept at the helm, we sat idle by and did nothing, we chouse to trust out heads into the sand and ignored the foot that kicked our asses whom was up in the air.
peace
“I am a bit sorry for that statement but its true, the human race is in decline and have been so for centurys to the peek idiocy we have to day.”
You can say that forever about the human race, but we only got to 2020 because ENOUGH of humanity was willing to “take the hard foul for the team.”
It’s not so much peak idiocy, as it is a difficult situation for most everybody. Even, or especially, some of the oligarchs. May they find out!
Yes it’s in decline for some, but some others will court inconvenience on our behalf. And they will get big blessings.
And even those “in decline” can improve, like wet tinder that dries over time.
Hope it dries quickly though!
But defeatism hasn’t been mandated by the deniers.
It’s only one option, not that promising.
Optimism is often pleasantly surprised. But these days only in unexpected ways.
But just that is enough.
Now would be a good time for Greta Thunberg to say to the panicdemic manufacturers, “How dare you!”
I don’t think her script touches upon the latest technology in common sense, however.
Even some old school, low tech common sense would be life-giving
If the Emperors in their global regalia of “new clothes” were to be “exposed” as the biggest co-conspirators of the “Hugest Hoax in History”, the wheels would be visibly coming off, now.
Instead –as was the script for the (Dead) “Lone Gunman” in 1963– we have trillions being spent to prop up this charade masquée, in progress, at all cost.
When the phrase “Hugest” comes to mind, this would be bad enough if it were 90% virus and 10% fraud.
But it’s the other way around.
I know quite a number of Germans here in LA, OC, SD, from the Nazi era, either in their 80s, or often their babies, boomers from 50s to 70s, and most of the ones settled in here won’t go so far as to say it, but their attitudes just shout out that they just always ASSumed Hitler was right, and still do.
That he and the Homeland were the greatest pairing in Germany since hot mustard met frankfurter.
I know several right now! They are in the majority here, too.
(Of course, no surprise really, that they came here.)
In 1933 virtually all German pastors (but Bonhoeffer) called the ascent of Adolf Hitler “a sign of God’s favor” and a Jubilee Year!
But it just proves the power of propaganda and its insidious staying power.
And most of them are very affable people, some even rather helpful.
But I imagine the same was true in 1st Century Jerusalem: many of the people going about their business had called, 5 or ten or twenty years before, for Jesus’ execution, and a dammed good thing it was, too, they probably thought.
But that doesn’t make them any less a menace to one and all, if they never awaken.
Not a new problem, either, but we have here the most explosive variation on that theme, ever.
My take on the “people” calling for Jesus’s execution 2,000 years ago is the same as my take on modern “people” calling for eugenics or wanting the death penalty:
It isn’t really the people. “The people” really don’t do such things, but their leaders and representatives most certainly do, or at least they use the people’s numbers to carry out their wishes. The mob was incited to crucify Jesus, just as we are being incited to go along with other abominable crimes today.
You won’t find a modern “person” willing to go and personally pull the plug on an elderly citizen in the name of reducing the population to manageable numbers, or willing personally to torture Julian Assange because they don’t like the fact that he has embarrassed their leaders, or willing personally to blow up three huge buildings in Manhatten because they think the people in the Middle East need to be taught a lesson and because they want to steal the oil those people own – UNLESS they feel that the vast majority of their “representatives” are in agreement that these things should be done. Then many of them will certainly agree to take part – though, mercifully, not all.
It’s that book, “The Crowd” again… and from 1895 too!
It’s not so much devolution of humankind as the option too often exercised of letting people “higher up” do their thinking for them. We hear that a lot at sites like these, but in a way I’m coming to finally understand that mass reflex: things have so “complexified” that many minds at a young age abdicate.
They “sell that birthright for a mess of potage” (as Esau did to Jacob, not grasping the seriousness of the young transaction?)
I met a guy at my “Y” just pre-covid. He was like the Missing Link to “all this”. He was no star, but not stupid. And we both had gone to military school during Vietnam, but he liked it so much that he kept on many years in the Army, through the War. I pop quizzed him, “Why? What did he like?” Etc.
I’m glad I did, he cleared up a mystery: he actually had enjoyed his whole life of being told what to do. He liked unthinking orders, just all a menu of commands. I asked him if he ever had any doubts. “Why would I? They were orders. You followed them.”
And that settled it. For him. For all time, too.
As a preferred mode of being, it’s very immature, but repeated often enough to last some people a whole lifetime. Especially the USA, where omnipresent panopticon propaganda made it the default mode, even mysteriously ages and ages ago. For the Silent Majority.
But as we talked I got more insight into such a robotic response. He makes the same reflex as the mass of the maskwearers in that respect, except he follows unquestioningly the politics of his demographic: unthinking right wing. They listen to Fox and just regurgitate the main points. If Fox, and all the Nazis in lockstep, were wearing masks, he’d be wearing one in a heartbeat. They would make the choice, not him. I see a lot of people at one church here who take orders from the Norbertines, very conservative in this area, who are mostly not wearing masks. At one point five or ten years ago they had pictures of dead soldiers all over the alcoves, but nary a Dead Poet, let alone a Society.
(Here, that’s limited now to dead soldiers….)
And these people know some of the right reasons for not wearing masks.
But they were all handed to them, as much as any mask.
So, same basic equation, same result.
We see here daily laments about the great unwashed and its hordes of tv viewers not thinking critically.
But these are embedded as habits.
Come to think of it, this catastrophe has the seeds of a new humanity and a quantum evolutionary leap: the soldier vet I talked to was not unusual and not stupid, just no officer aspirations.
This faux crisis is just going to be so in their faces, and thats just what they need to change basic training.
A whole sea change of social meaning that will either wake them up or sweep them out.
Mess Hall gave them a set menu, placed on a platter before them.
But the fallout from all this will be no free lunches. If your mental life has gone on forever without TRYING for a pulse, they’ll get robots who can do all that much
better.
TRYING is the operative word, since many people ain’t that bright, myself included! Late bloomers often happen, so eugenics will not be able ever to forecast that. Problem with science is that its value judgments are by definition sense-based and stats-based, no clear rationale.
Truth be told, faith and its mission of love is the only quality that can outweigh it. Who forecasts that? Prophets?
Eugenics and overweening “science” (vaccines + $$$ etc etc) pose as an improvement on that.
Just like the Golden Calf, at another time, another place.
I appreciate your input, and totally get where you’re coming from.
I suppose I was also slow and reluctant in coming to the conclusion that many of us humans have no idea of what “to think” really means. Your example, “They were orders. You followed them”, says it all, although I might have tried to reply by asking, “Doesn’t it even matter to you whether it is a piece of shit giving the orders because he likes the power trip, or a genuine authority who has a tremendous grasp of all aspects of a military conflict – including the moral ones? And, if that doesn’t matter to you, then what makes you different from the guys hanged after the Nurnberg trials, claiming they were just obeying orders?”
But I would expect to be dismissed with something like, “Aw, you just think too much”…
How simple life is for some people, but those who have developed a rich inner life, however complicated, would not want to go back to that.
Also I don’t really have a problem with the idea that people mature, as you indicate, at different stages, some early, some late – not to mention the notion that repeated lives on Earth could create many opportunities for even later evolution and maturity…But that, of course, is too cuckoo a concept for many modern people to consider even for a second. “I have no faith”, is now a very popular bumper sticker, even though those very same people are often prepared to put ALL that non-existent faith into the shallow ramblings of a half-wit “representative” with no interest in anything other than his financial profits and investments.
By the way, I consider myself a “late developer” too, when I think of what an immature twit I was when I was a young man, but life has given me many rich rewards since then, and I have learned a lot.
As you say, TRYING is crucial, and I was fortunate enough to have teachers who showed me how to do that quite a long time ago.
I think they spotted that I had a pulse to start with, though…
“Problem with science is that its value judgments are by definition sense-based and stats-based, no clear rationale.”
Bertrand Russell was asked the difference between science and philosophy. He said science could tell you what you could do but philosophy questioned whether or not you should.
Science doesn’t make value judgements. Or shouldn’t at least.
Well, yes, I’m sorry if the “raccourci” wasn’t stated more clearly, but I was suggesting that it was implicit: of course –by definition– science is only a tool wielded in different ways. I was tying into the whole trend of these threads about the Magic Virus, which is that science is abused to promote an agenda of vaccines, and a whole lot of other things that should be questioned much more rigorously (“scientifically”) than they are, currently.
Beginning with the “cui bono”. Is this whole pandemic about protecting mankind, or protecting Bill and Melinda’s vaccine profitability? Among other less than “scientific” objectives.
Asking those questions early and often also shines a light on both the science and non-science, or pseudo-science.
An interesting exam.
Yes, this is the central point, but all you have to do to eliminate free speech is make the claim that censorship is “for your own good” or “for the good of others.” Essentially wiping away our mature adult ability to discern for ourselves what is best for us, or even what is best for others if we have also taken on that responsibility. Needless to say, allowing the state to decide that for us will undoubtedly lead to totalitarian rule. There has never, in all of world history, been an exception—absolute power corrupts absolutely.
The iconic Aaron Copland, American composer, spoke in the 1940s against the McCarthy witch hunts and the Stalin purges, about an important and even primary attribute in any culture with any Art Spirit, to speak of, and: “…the artist’s immemorial right to be wrong.”
THE WORM IN OUR AMERICAN (BIG) APPLE:
“That community is already in the process of dissolution where each man begins to eye his neighbor as a possible enemy, where nonconformity with the accepted creed, political as well as religious, is a mark of disaffection; where denunciation, without specification or backing, takes the place of evidence; where orthodoxy chokes freedom of dissent; where faith in the eventual supremacy of reason has become so timid that we dare not enter our convictions in the open lists, to win or lose.”
— JUDGE LEARNED HAND
A fascinating mind of the American courts, FDR, and Eleanor, had wanted him seated on the Supreme Court, but a dream derailed for reasons of political baggage, though 15 years after I heard his name often as a lad at our lawyer’s dinner table; a review of his wikiquotes in itself a solid jurisprudential orientation to the philisophy of core rights’ issues now globally upon us all.
“Our dangers lie, as it seems to me, not in the outrageous but in the conformist.”
Mask wearers, take note!
I don’t suppose it’s any news to anyone to state this is obviously outrageous, but we appear to be living in a world now in that it is “the outrageous” in behaviour coming from those in positions of authority and power that appears to be “the new normal.”
The article poses the question of “why” they are doing this, the “they” being presumably the owners of Google, of whom YouTube now is effectively a subsidiary company.
So we could now start talking about the fact we know (thanks to Wikipedia for example) that the owners of Google are worth US $60bn and $69bn respectively, and the wife of one of them is heavily into biotech, co-founded and is CEO of a biotech company, and also worked as a health consultant after graduation (again, info thanks to Wikipedia), and start hunting for motives and explanations and justifications of why they presumably support this kind of tyranny.
I don’t think however that is the point, or question that should concern us, except to say that the answer to why they are doing this kind of censorship is fundamentally because they can.
The real issue is that America and the West are supposed to be democracies, but now extremely rich private individuals are deciding it is their right to ban the free speech of several billions of by comparison extremely poor ones.
So this is a failure of our democracy, as is this whole lockdown event in general, because as I have in my view proven in earlier comments, much or most of this is being done against the will of most of the public.
Briefly, I have pointed out in earlier comments that before it was enforced on the public with various threats, whether legal punishment like fines or by humiliation or intimidation of those who refuse to obey the measures, in most Western countries, at least 75%, and I’d say up to 95% or more in public places, were not wearing masks by choice, even though they knew the government wanted them to.
Likewise, anywhere the mask wearing is not compulsory, there is almost universal rejection of mask wearing and much social distancing still, including bars and restaurants, and at certain demonstrations of the same people who even claim to support mask wearing and social distancing, but are clearly shown as practising neither, just as many authority figures like Professor Ferguson have themselves repeatedly flouted their own rules they have recommended or caused to be imposed on others by their so called scientific opinions.
So governments and the mainstream offline and online media appear to have forgotten, that unlike China, we actually live in democracies in the West, and the governments are elected by us to serve us, and not for we to serve or be treated like slaves or prisoners and criminals by them.
The question is whether the history of the world to date suggests that this kind of tyranny of effective dictatorship can be maintained permanently, or for long periods, and history suggests it cannot last all that long.
History suggests that a large percentage of the population would rather die than live in a tyranny, and are therefore likely to sooner or later attempt to resist it in large numbers, and even if it is broken in one country, that will likely scare the authorities in others enough to knock it off also.
The most foolish people in all this are the mainstream media, who seem to be blissfully unaware for the moment, that as this tyranny grows, most of them will be the victims of it also, there is no safety for anybody in dictatorships, and this is what all those who foolishly collaborate with it constantly overlook.
They overlook that when they take measures which can silence anybody, those same measures can be used to silence them, if they too get injustice against them, and find then there is no freedom or justice to protect them either.
At best, they are simply saying that they cannot trust the public to make its own minds up if it is given the freedom to hear different opinions, and therefore, they are showing once again that they are fundamentally against democracy.
So really, this is just a naked display of dictatorship by the rich, totally overruling democratic rights to freedom of thought and speech, and as the public becomes clearer about this, whatever support currently exists for these measures, is going to rapidly evaporate.
This is generally speaking how and why tyrants fall. They get so overconfident of their own power, that they think they can mass abuse the public and get away with it.
They might for a while, but history suggests not all that long – whether it’s Hitler or the Pharaohs or the Romanovs or the French aristocrats, once they abuse the public beyond a certain point, their “let them eat cake” moment, this illusion of power they think they have and indeed temporarily seem to have, can dissolve more quickly than the proverbial snowball in hell.
The world is not what it was in those former tyrannies – the people now are far more used to freedom, they won’t accept slavery, and are far more educated about history and able to talk to their neighbours all over the world instantly.
When over 7 billion people don’t like what’s happening, a few thousand billionaires are not going to be able to control them, because even the police and soldiers who may for the moment be loyal to them, won’t be depended upon if enough of the population is against them.
The billionaires want to be secure – tyranny won’t make them so, only reducing the gap between rich and poor will, and it’s up to the mainstream media to stop being so cowardly, and explain that to them.
they are not media but advertising platforms. the articles and news reports, even the movies and dramas are thinly veiled adverts. the only way to effect advertising is by not buying the products so other adverts take over. certain companies pay well beyond the market rate inorder to gain that control over the content.
Rachel
I take the point, but when the controlling owners of YouTube/Google have got $60bn and $69bn “in their back pockets”, it’s hard to believe they can’t resist the demands of some of their advertisers if they want to.
So in fact, social media companies and search engine ones have far less excuse than the MSM for supporting and ordering this tyranny.
I agree completely that their wealth is beyond astronomically pornographic. However, their greed is even more so and the accumulation of more is irresistible. Additionally, control is what they seek; not only money.
Look at those smirking, parasitic megalomaniacs, Bezos and Gates. They are far ahead of the Goggle Brothers and still collecting both.
When this far out of control, Capitalism will and should consume itself and I am praying that this virus bullshit is to cover its death throes as the economies of the world (which were at death’s door before the great shutdown) collapse.
Perhaps “the virus done it” as the reason billions are on destitution row will be rejected wholesale.
I’ve replied to you briefly, but for some reason both my posts have gone in “awaiting approval” – no idea why.
(briefly, I just said the owners are incredibly rich, so they have no need to bow down to advertisers if they don’t want to)
Great comment nouserid. Ultimately i have faith that we will reach a tipping point where a large enough percenrage of society say enough is enough. In between now and then I find myself swinging between anger, dissolution , hope and optimism. It really is a roller coaster of emotion.
Yes, as I also said in earlier comments, I think it’s largely a matter of patience, because this event is so unprecedented and confusing, happening to the whole world at once, the public are in shock, so haven’t got their bearings yet, and also haven’t properly seen the damage the lockdown has done in most cases.
The authorities have declared war on their own people, and we have to understand that, and accept that if we want to win this war, we need to have the same spirit of resistance as we had in the other great wars, World War I and II.
For the moment, the resistance is mainly limited to the thinking minority, but it won’t be soon, once the public wakes up to the damage that has been done to them, and the most likely event is no successful vaccine will be found. And then the public will start saying this is all a fraud, and there is no reason to continue the lockdown, and the herd immunity route is the only way forward, just as with almost every other epidemic in human history, and for the governments of the world therefore to stop lying to us, and pretending they can control a virus and save our lives, when they can’t, without destroying them far more than they save them.
Well, you say that people won’t accept slavery, but in many, many countries, they have done just that.
The people no longer have any memories or experience of outright rebellion, so that we now have a situation where one is absolutely amazed at what international government has already proven it can get away with.
We have NOT rebelled, which means we have also entertained the thought that any excuse for locking down our society in the future will most likely also be accepted.
We don’t really know what they own. For instance, is the message in the following interview that, rather than it being Zuckerberg’s hoodie, it is actually Zuckerberg who is owned?
Good luck with that one. We would be addressing an ever-burgeoning convention of pimps at most, merely missioned to report for a “Parliament of Whores”.
Other than that, a piece of cake.
Just to be clear on the lay of the land, as it now stands. In 2020, not 1920.
“So this is a failure of our democracy, as is this whole lockdown event in general, because as I have in my view proven in earlier comments, much or most of this is being done against the will of most of the public.”
It is more immediately the failure of the courts, where most of the more important judgeships are appointed, not elected. Or jointly stolen.
It’s harsh to pin it on the people, the public, when these barbarities are imposed as a cancellation by oligarchs: the failure, as can be clearly shown, lies in a slyly written Constitution, worded by framers who were overwhelmingly rich white male WASP…..slaveowners.
Beyond that? Typically grand statesmen for their times.
A SNAFU from the getgo.
At least many of their French counterparts in the landed gentry supported La Révolution. And paid for it with their heads. (Yanks say, “Put your money where your mouth is.” Many of them in France put both intothose Robespierre “collection basket” offerings!)
Constitutions are clearly just tools, such ad hoc finite instruments, not “sacramentals” to be encased in glass in a museum and worshipped as unchangeable, as Scalia intended. And the American versions seem to have rotted through, in their rations of justice….
The whole world is picking up the tab this Summer.
(What more can anyone expect, when 140 years ago a railroad executive moonlighting as a court clerk wrote erroneously into a railroad baron judgement that corporations have the same rights as persons under the law? Letting that “typo” stand, has collapsed the entire base of what remained of American “law”.
Add to it “Bush v. Gore” in 2000 and “Citizens United” a few years later, and we have us the makings of a pandemic of Ponzi Scheme, global, that might make some of the slaveowners in the midst of a “Dred Scott” miscarriage turn “pale” by comparison. Or, pale-er.)
Not the failure of democracy”, more like its rape…..
I think that that is an important distinction to make.
DIRECTOR’S CUT (PRIOR VERSIONS DISCARDED, THOUGH APPEAR AS POSTED DUE TO A HARSH & VARIABLE TIME LIMIT ON THE EDIT FUNCTION, APPARENTLY A GLITCH.):~
“So this is a failure of our democracy, as is this whole lockdown event in general, because as I have in my view proven in earlier comments, much or most of this is being done against the will of most of the public.”
“DEMOCRACY” has little or nothing to do with the failure. It is more immediately the failure of the courts, where most of the more important judgeships are appointed, not elected. (Or jointly stolen.)
It’s harsh to pin it on the people, the public (“a failure of democracy”) –which we’ve been hearing for years as the guilty party– these barbarities are imposed as its cancellation by oligarchs: the failure, as can be clearly shown, lies in a slyly written Constitution, worded by framers who were overwhelmingly rich white male WASP…..slaveowners.
Beyond that? Typically grand statesmen for their times.
A SNAFU from the getgo.
At least many of their French counterparts in the landed gentry supported La Révolution. And paid for it with their heads. (Yanks say, “Put your money where your mouth is.” Many of them in France put both à la fois into those Robespierre “collection basket” offerings!)
Constitutions are clearly just tools, such ad hoc finite instruments, not “sacramentals” to be encased in glass in a museum and worshipped as unchangeable, as our late Scalia intended. And the American versions seem to have rotted through, in their rations of justice….
The whole world is picking up the tab this Summer….
(What more can anyone expect, when 140 years ago a railroad executive moonlighting as a court clerk wrote erroneously into a railroad baron judgement that corporations have the same rights as persons under the law? Letting that “typo” stand, has collapsed the entire base of what remained of American “law”.
Add to it “Bush v. Gore” in 2000 and “Citizens United” a few years later, and we have us the makings of a pandemic of Ponzi Scheme, global, that might make some of the slaveowners in the midst of a “Dred Scott” miscarriage turn “pale” by comparison. Or, paler.)
Not the “failure of democracy”, more like its rape…..
I think that that is an important distinction to make.
£4£&$4$~~~~
In any case, most of the history of “Democracy” has been written as a crafty “dog ‘n pony show” or pantomime by its subverters: FDR said something that I can’t source, but I know it’s out there, that anyone who really knows the history of the USA (north American version) will tell you “it hasn’t been a democracy since at least 1820”.
In such a fix, it’s harsh to blame democrats. It’s like blaming sex abuse victims for poor results in acts of conjoining. Seriously.
Jeff C on censorship in this neo-Stalinist age. Spot on as usual . . .
Why, indeed. This week, YouTube, Fakebook, and Gulag all banned a video in which frontline doctors explained how they were preventing virtually all deaths from Covid-19 with early HCQ cocktail treatment, as many nations have been doing around the world. They also excoriated the media for hiding this truth and for demonising HCQ. No one can profit from promoting HCQ, as it is off patent. It costs around $10 to treat each patient. That ruins the gigantic profits possible with drugs like Gilead’s Remdesivir, now priced around $3,200 per patient. Gilead was behind the fraudulent Lancet study which demonised HCQ and was used by the WHO to do likewise. That major study is now withdrawn thanks to independent experts exposing it on social media. I say these heroes are the people to follow and trust, especially James Todaro. They only gain death threats for their work, not dollars. Try for yourselves:
https://omnij.org/Gilead:_Twenty-one_billion_reasons_to_discredit_hydroxychloroquine_(ORIGINAL_ARTICLE)
The doctors video still up here:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/07/28/watch-live-silenced-frontline-doctors-hold-capitol-hill-press-conference-to-challenge-big-tech/
Good comment NicS! Thanks for the links.
The doctors video still up here:
that seems to be their second press conference, which will presumably also be removed from YooToob in short order.
the original press conference is here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/71W1O4TdJxo0/
and the most recent here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kXyc2DGfXITP/
Capitol Hill press conference, as above.
https :// www . bitchute . com / video / 71W1O4TdJxo0 /
[perhaps the admins could remove the spaces, to make this link functional; I didn’t want this post to sit in the approval queue. it seems like four links per post, rather than two, would be a more reasonable upper limit to avoid moderation.]
Frontline Physicians Aim to Dispel Massive COVID-19 Disinformation Campaign — part 1
https://www.bitchute.com/video/q2JWTMUtKj5C/
Frontline Physicians Aim to Dispel Massive COVID-19 Disinformation Campaign — part 2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kXyc2DGfXITP/
What utter cnut thought that gilead would be a great name for a company ???? especially one involved in the hunt for the golden egg that will be the equivalent of intravenous holy water
https://the-handmaids-tale.fandom.com/wiki/Republic_of_Gilead_(Series)
Blessed be the fruit..in his eye
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilead
there is no evidence covid19 exists. the hcq might be less deadly than other treatments but that doesnt say much. https://youtu.be/gy2OgROkyDI
Isn’t NATOs Atlantic Council advising social media whom to censor?
And the ADL may flag the most videos?
Have not heard any news of big tech CEOs Congressional testimony in the antitrust hearings from Tuesday. Will report back if I find anything.
https://www.rt.com/usa/496587-tech-hearing-congress-zuckerberg-google/
I only use YouTube for downloading music videos, so the clampdown on political content won’t affect me much. I’m not sure why anyone would want to spend longer on YouTube than absolutely necessary, not least because of the godawful ads, featuring some of the most irritating people in the world.
I have previously posted on here videos from the German ‘Extra-Parliamentary Coronavirus Inquiry’ (ACU) established a few weeks ago by a team of German medics, led by Dr Heiko Schoening, to gather evidence that the coronavirus narrative is fraudulent.
https://acu2020.org/international/
The links to the videos being posted on the official ACU website are being removed. So it is no longer possible to access the disturbing presentation given by Prof Franz Ruppert on the psychological impact of lockdown and mask wearing.
In the last few days there has been a conference in Spain (Doctors for Truth Spain). This too has been censored online. But the following (10 minute) introduction by guest speaker, Dr Schoening, is still on Youtube for the time being. In it Dr Schoening states that the ACU now has 500 signed up members, and they produce 500k weekly printed news sheets. He repeats the ACU’s contention that the coronavirus narrative is a ‘scam’ and ‘fake’, and is intended as a ‘cover story’ to disguise economic misdemeanours.
These people are not lunatics or traitors (or whatever people like to call them), they are honest professionals who want the truth to be heard…and they are being closed down worldwide. Extremely sinister.
Watch it while you can.
presumably they will repost the videos, once they can arrange alternative hosting.
https://acu2020.org/english-versions/
Let’s hope so.
I notice that every post here, without exception, is getting 1 downvote from some anonymous viewer.
Kind of like ‘scent marking’ by a dumb animal – every tree gets it?
There’s a down-voter troll allocating at least one down vote or two..just someone bored…
A 77th’er earning their corn?
“Kind of like ‘scent marking’ by a dumb animal – every tree gets it?”
No they don’t, observe a set of cats for a while and you will see.
I consider cats to be quite intelligent animals.
The downvoter however, is literally ‘dumb’.
As in – never a reply.
“The downvoter however, is literally ‘dumb’.”
Yes, agreed. So why do you let it bother you?
It’s obviously someone who has trouble getting it up.
Oh, you’ve noticed. I thought you were quicker than that brew.
I got attacked for mocking someone who drew attention to this a couple of days ago.
No, it’s not me doing it, but so f*ing what?
Do you come on here for upvotes?
Who’s behind this group /Together? Their “survey” is currently the lead story in UK MSM and they appear to have been the originators of the clapping-the-NHS campaign.
This survey looks like a classic exercise in data-mining for fine-tuning further manipulation and the MSM coverage is just free advertising for it.
The Fraudian also has a story up about a digital insomnia cure is better than face-to-face cures. It’s obvious programming for the rolling out of telemedicine.
Being a moon dweller with Elvis, I find it difficult keeping up with the MSM. Where did you see together mentioned? Is it the mental health chaaridy? Good video on YT by amazing Polly today about chaaridys,by the way.
Yes. The NLP is strong with the Guardian. I saw the strap line for the article on the insomnia cure and had the same sequence of synaptic handovers that you did.
People really are fucking stupid, I’m sad to say.
they fail to include a warning about content containing signs of a lock down. they are terrorising people with claims there is a pathogenic virus and seeking to recruit and train terrorists. a simple warning would make clear the dangers of such content but they are law breakers refusing to warn of such soald content.
see if you deserve what comes next:) https://youtu.be/v0T0uCdVzMM
other tricks you tube does is loads up the video really slowly, wont lets you comment on the video
pretends the video doesn’t exist
stools and sticks during certain periods
etc
Audio dropout and loss of picture is common, too. That’s never, ever happened on a nonpolitical video yet happens repeatedly with COVID related content.
The WSWS gets tetchy:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/07/29/scho-j29.html
But
Yes lots of positive testing …but how many died? Well,
No link supplied here so I did a search on the phrase “but the lack of funding, time, and resources” – and came up only with sites that consisted of that quote on its own.
Stench of a rodent?
Stench of a nest of ‘em, I would say.
WSWS are really weird. Yesterday they published a piece about HCQ that it’s a fraudulent treatment and referred to the Houston, Texas interview as follows:
No mention of the Lancet withdrawal of the article on HCQ. Again, if Trump has anything to do with it, it’s condemned.
PS: talking of censorship; WSWS censored my comment on the HCQ issue.
They’ve been doing that for a while. They’ve gone so far in on the pandemic panic they won’t allow any deviation from their party line. They have shown their true colours and yes, they are in many respects a less reliable news source than Breitbart now. Their coverage of COVID is utterly farcical and as bad as anything out there.
Where is there proof that the views expressed are “anti-science” or “reactionary” (whatever the latter can mean in this context)? They present none, just hurl abuse and vitriol at anyone who doesn’t toe their party line. The WSWS are themselves the ones who are behaving unscientifically. Where do they ever discuss that inventor Kary Mullis intended PCR to be a manufacturing technique not a diagnostic tool for diseases, and staunchly opposes its use as the latter? And even explained in some detail why it was unreliable and unusable as the latter? If the WSWS refuses to address that little pertinent fact, then they stand exposed as unscientific frauds themselves.
Breitbart terrifies them. I switched to it 5 years ago, following the explosion of hate against Trump, which was/is clearly unbalanced in terms of both fair news reporting and the feverish minds of MSM journalists. Before that I had trusted MSM (leftist) labels used to smear competing independent and anti-leftist news sites and opinions, such as the ridiculous ‘ultra-right’ you cite here. This is empty name-calling. Leftists appear unable to understand that ‘critical of leftism’ and ‘Right-wing’ are not the same. To say some idea or policy is mistaken or fraudulent doesn’t mean you know what’s better, only that it you disagree with it. Today, I trust Breitbart to give me ‘news plus’, meaning they restore the missing facts and critical focus usually deleted by the corporate media, and also report many vital stories the MSM never will, because of its political bias. Thanks to independent news sites, I can always predict how the MSM will spin news stories, as they all mysteriously speak with one harmonious, ‘progressive’ voice. They know this is becoming obvious and are afraid of losing control over popular opinion, which is why Big tech is doing so much to censor Breitbart stories and delete them from search results.
Read all about it and see for yourselves; don’t let labels close your minds:
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/07/30/daily-caller-experienced-google-suppression-says-editor-in-chief/
Well, I disagree, Breitbart ‘news’ is a hair short of being Fascist and I had no idea the Houston interview on HCQ was first flighted on Breitbart. Does it alter my view? Well, it opens it to question.
I am intrigued by Breitbart’s comment section. Let’s take an item they posted just today (30/7/2020): “Conservative Firebrand Herman Cain Dies After Battle with Coronavirus” Comments added – 5,300 and climbing even as I watch. Granted they also include comments posted on their FB page but even then, it’s an astonishing score. The earliest comment (excluding one that was deleted – I wonder why?) was posted 3 hours ago. Let’s do the math: it works out at about 30 comments per minute. Well well well – do you think that this reflects the true “voice of the people”? I’ll tell you what I think: they have a team of phony posters each adopting multiple identities and paid to do nothing other than post post post. Or perhaps they just use bots?
I’m sure you’re correct. Breitbart surely can’t be that popular, but hey, who knows? Have you looked at the comments to see if they make a pattern of some kind? Give ’em the Turing Test?
I have no intention of wading through thousands although I did try the first ten or so and half of them gave me that “This user’s details are private. DEAL WITH IT!” label. So who knows? In the end I agree that it’s not important. I see Bbart as on the fairly dumb scale. Unlike, say, Standpoint magazine who can do the cultured pontification bit but who basically just shovel the same neo-con type shit.
Who knows? I know it’s “right wing” so maybe you have a bias against it? And again, does it really matter anyway?
The “right wing” bit is irrelevant. Any site that features those ceaselessly cascading responses EVERY time seems deeply suspicious to me. But as you say it probably doesn’t matter much. See my reponse to Barovsky above.
This may help – an epidemiologist from the Yale School of Public Health
https://www.globalresearch.ca/key-defeating-covid-19-exists-need-start-using/5719845
Thanks to independent news sites, I can always predict how the MSM will spin news stories, as they all mysteriously speak with one harmonious, ‘progressive’ voice.
it is apparent that the MSM is somehow centrally coordinated (CIA?), to the extent that they often seem to be reading from the same script. referring to a diverse spectrum of opinion will certainly give you a better opportunity to evaluate what is actually going on.
to balance out the right-wing perspective from Breitbart, try looking at Global Research for an authentic left-wing analysis of world politics. you may be surprised at how extremely unlike the MSM it is, which you have falsely been led to believe is “leftist”. it is in fact neoliberal, and makes extensive use of identity-politics to obscure the class antagonisms which, if they were to be discussed, might suggest radical solutions to the rapidly deepening crisis of international capitalism. this must be avoided at all costs; hence the rabid PC insanity which increasingly dominates the MSM ruling-class propaganda outlets.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/
This is a complex issue. For myself, I’m completely against any kind of censorship, even of racist/fascist views, abhorrent though they may be, because if you censor one view of the world, it’s a slippery slope to censoring any view that differs from the ‘official’ line.
On the other hand, the problem is compounded by the fact that we’re being completely swamped with data (as opposed to information) in an endless stream that is impossible for us to get our heads around!
Coming to conclusions about events depends on critical thinking which in turn depends on being fully informed about the event. But being swamped with data, makes it nigh on impossible to sort sense from nonsense.
The Houston doctor HCQ video, is a case in point. Is she telling the truth or is it a setup? Once I see the Breitbart/Christian fundamentalist etc connection, I have a kneejerk reaction, and as result, I start to question the veracity of the piece. HCQ vanishes in the process.
Time to go ANALOGUE!!! Fuck the Internet!
A fan of Breitbart, NicS? Well there’s a surprise! Well here’s a hint for you, “the Left” aren’t really the Left.
Correction: the Western Left and a goodly amount of the rest.
On the subject of censorship not far removed, what of your rights to legal representation when the subject of treatment for the mysterious BS19 goes pear shaped?
To my friends in the US please do not get into the treatment zone….
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/20
Sorry this link is not opening on the article which advises that medical professionals are now indemnified against any legal claims for compensation in the event of an error, mistake, accident etc. when treating for the bs19.
I understood that this means that you have no rights if under the ‘care’ of a medical person in the realm of the bs19.
I don’t think that’s strictly true, at least as far as vaccines are concerned. I’ve forgotten the link but apparently millions have been paid out to people injured by vaccines as there is some kind of state-indemnified scheme.
The title of the article reads:
How Covid-19 Will Affect Medical Malpractice and You.
Is this the article?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/07/joseph-mercola/how-covid-19-will-affect-medical-malpractice-and-you/
Thanks LiaDW!
On a different site the article dated 22/7.
There are quite a few good articles on Mercola.com but I notice that he’s not saying anything about the legitimacy of the supposed virus.
He and his many contributers do however place articles that question the common narrative.
Looking a little hairy for the potential victims of a malpractice suit which for some reason gives me a chill in my guts.
His article mentions just a few states, but gosh I imagine it would spread it’s tentacles across the country stealthily protecting those who pledge to ‘do no harm’.
he is promoting dave asprey keto coffee bs aswell as covid. https://youtu.be/em02bdh0QRE
Fancy a bit of satire, folks? All right then, I aim to please . . .
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-why-i-decided-to-take-the-word-chief-out-of-my-ceo-title-to-respect/
We still name our military helicopter gunships after victims of genocide. Nobody bats an eyelash about that: Blackhawk. Apache. And Comanche. If the Luftwaffe named its military helicopters Jew and Gypsy, I suppose people would notice.”
― Noam Chomsky, Propaganda and the Public Mind: Conversations with Noam Chomsky and David Barsamian
Chomsky is a fraud! Denying American Government involvement in 9/11 makes him an accomplice. The bloke makes me puke!
What kind of fraud can write a book on American hegemony without addressing the Jewish Question? What a blatant phony.
Yep! Its a travesty that this dent on humanity is still heard.
Much as I dislike the arrogant elitist Noam Chomsky, I praise his criticism of cancel culture and his defending of free speech. He will soon be cancelled.
Free speech? He labelled everyone a dissident, moron, idiot, simpleton, a flatout conspiracy theorist with regards to 9/11. The arsehole couldn’t even answer a simple question. The fuckwit wouldn’t even consider the science. We are all lunatics, apparently.
Yeah, great man Noam? A true treasure for propaganda.
Noam Chomsky and the Compatible Left — part 1
Noam Chomsky and the Compatible Left — part 2
Noam Chomsky and the Compatible Left — part 3
Noam Chomsky and the Compatible Left — part 4
Did ‘we’ notice the Iranian military writing “Death to Israel” messages on the ballistic missiles they keep testing? Also, I haven’t noticed if the People’s Army of communist China name their military aircraft after famous Chinese warriors, but I have certainly noticed the 1.5m ethnic Muslims, Tibetans and political dissidents locked away in Chinese concentration camps, probably forever, where they fear torture, rape, enforced sterilisation, murder and organ harvesting. Naughty Hong-Kongers are being put on trains, probably with the same destination, as we write. Have you seen any leftists protesting all this Hitlerian horror, or are they perhaps too busy hating Trump and the names of US helicopters? Did you know Orange Man Bad is the only leader with the balls to protest the Chinese communist nightmare and impose sanctions? And would you ever have the courage to support him on that?
I have certainly noticed the 1.5m ethnic Muslims, Tibetans and political dissidents locked away in Chinese concentration camps, probably forever, where they fear torture, rape, enforced sterilisation, murder and organ harvesting. Naughty Hong-Kongers are being put on trains, probably with the same destination, as we write.
such claims would carry more credibility if they came with serious references, but somehow they always originate from US imperial disinfo campaigns. why don’t you tell us all about Iraq’s WMD program, Libyan viagra mercenaries, and Syrian chemical weapons attacks, while you’re at it. you may say that’s all discredited BS, but there is no reason to suppose that the current Hate China campaign is any different. for someone who claims to understand the propaganda function of the MSM, you’re surprisingly naive.
To name something after someone, or some group, is either to honour them, or to preserve the memory of those remembered for their virtue or example of courage, and never named to disparage or vilify.
Thus America is (or was, if conforming to current trends and logic) replete with the naming of places and sport teams of historical worthy opponents in battle.
We still name our military helicopter gunships after victims of genocide. Nobody bats an eyelash about that: Blackhawk. Apache. And Comanche. If the Luftwaffe named its military helicopters Jew and Gypsy, I suppose people would notice.”
― Noam Chomsky Propaganda and the Public Mind: Conversations with David Barsamian
posted twice as waiting approval for the post
Don’t forget to bat an eyelid or even shed a tear for Chinese Uigyurs and their missing organs.
— nor the helpless Kuwaiti babies tossed out of their incubators by Saddam Hussein’s evil death legions in 1990.
You sound like a representative of the CCP.
So far I’ve only had time to listen to the first segment of this multiple part interview with Alison McDowell of Wrenchinthegears – but her work is really worthwhile and I highly recommend it if you’re wondering where all this madness is actually – “going.”
https://wrenchinthegears.com/
Thanks for posting. Haven’t had time to look yet, but I am sure it is well worth a watch.
This lady’s work looks to be excellent.
Thank you for the introduction 👍
Big picture on human capital markets and historic context for the Covid reset here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqFTyYhfNQs
Transcript – blogged here. https://wrenchinthegears.com/2020/03/12/human-capital-markets-digital-identity-the-united-nations-sustainable-development-goals/
Thank you for these links Alison.
Read my mind: was looking for a transcript. Thanks!
Thanks Gary. Quality site, by all signs.
Alison’s work is top notch I think. Alison and Whitney Webb are offering us insight into a world that MSM pretends doesn’t even exist. Meanwhile, with both AI and robotic advances you and I become more “expendable” by the day.
Watched all three episodes now. I have often felt that we need somebody of Marx’s intellectual stature to analyze everything that is happening in the world and make sense of it in a way that promotes the interests of the oppressed masses. I wonder if Ms McDowell is indeed that person.
Tim – the depth, breadth and insight of Alison’s research is quite stunning to me. I pride myself on knowing what’s going on in the world, but her work has shown me just how much has been quietly going on behind the scenes that I had very little real information about – all as our “betters” plan a world of complete and total “domestication” and “absolute control” we superfluous plebs. I think Alison is correct in that we can’t possibly understand the MSM covid narratives – without understanding the various interlocking elite agendas she outlines all designed for maintaining oligarchic wealth & power & capitalism – in a world in which the vast majority of humanity is simply no longer of any real “use” to them.
Meanwhile this is perfectly fine. No restrictions, nothing. Got kids? Then have them watch and absorb this on their phones. If there are any covidchok idiots around, you must realise this is the agenda at work. It’s not a fucking conspiracy “theory”, morons.
this is perfectly fine
apparently not, whatever it was.
On a related note looks like this alternative media site being targeted with hit pieces in mainstream media. Their reaction to suggestions their authors are Russian agents.
https://oneworld.press
Kneejerk MSM fear and loathing for anything Russian makes me trust Russia more than I trust the MSM.
Are you allowed to claim that nurses gyrating, ass bouncing, skatting and bee-bopping to raise awareness is weird as fuck? How about the Australian plan…headlined in national newspapers months ago to…put your pijamas on and dance and schuck and jive in your driveway after breakfast? You know…to support the brave nurses. Can we say that this was stone cold odd as fuck in the midst of a serious viral outbreak?
Fits perfectly with a serious mass outbreak of mental illness.
Absolutely
ritual, during clap ritual of u.k each Thursday 8pm
the time 8pm relates to a planetary energy which relates to angel or demon which governs that time period
the clap i self has correlation which goes back
what seems all fun and govil is actually summons of entity’s
mass scale well that how the rule the world
ritual repetition alchemy etc
Evidence can convince
Agree completely, as a retired nurse I was appalled but not surprised by this behaviour.
I think their doing this is really quite sick. Since when were hospitals ever not busy?
Did it not concern them that thousands of people with serious illnesses were not turning up for treatment?
Even The Highwire with Del Bigtree is gone. Even that. Its reached the point that everyone and every group that seriously questions the WHO ‘official narrative’ about covid is being systematically removed from YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.
And groups of Doctors and others who question what is happening are relentlessly demonised and smeared by the presstitutes who masquerade as journalists. These same presstitutes who are commiting psychological terrorism against humanity. Because that’s what it is – terrorism.
Ask Judy Mikovits, Dolores Cahill, Knut Wittkowski and Dr Stella Immanuel, Dr Dan Ericsson and others.
And here in Melbourne, it appears the large majority have lapped up the presstitutes fear mongering with relish, and are now viciously attacking ordinary people who are also questioning the covid narrative or for wearing a mask.
Many are demanding these people be jailed or thrown in a mental health facility for questioning the panicdemic or refusing to comply. Imagine that:
people demanding those who refuse to wear a facemask be jailed.
What does that say about modern Australia? What sort of sick society is that? Whatever happened to free speech?
A bit off topic I know but what’s this strange story from Sydney. An inmate of Parklea correctional facility has “tested positive for Covid 19” . This was a person arrested on driving offences, refused bail and put in prison. Could there be a story behind this? Could this be a person who was asking awkward questions and has had their freedom taken away twice – 1) loss of physical liberty and 2) by loss of bodily integrity – now being registered as a “sick” person who needs to be subjected to surveillance.
Yep.
I never saw that Maggie, but refused bail for driving offences?
There is something very sinister going on in this country, particularly here in Victoria.
Seen numerous videos now of people being arrested, and in quite an aggressive manner for not wearing a facemask.
I’ve actually wondered, why have there not been more whistleblowers in Australia, compared to the UK or United States?
There’s a lot more people living in the US and the UK?
the highwire doesnt warn their content contains signs of a lock down. they immediately accepted the notion of a novel virus failing to warn of their soald content. https://youtu.be/5QPp0ADPW54
Gezzah. The collective thinking is under control and being directed.
The modern acronym of “FOMO” is in full swing, as the idiots gorge themselves on collecting LIKES for pointing out anyone not dressed as they are.
I can see a lynching coming soon, with the MSM “reports” selling the justified eradication of a rogue biological terrorist.
“She’s a witch!”
Such is the hyperventilating hatred of the herd for those who question the whole covid narrative or for refusing to wear masks, I seriously believe people in Melbourne are in danger of being physically attacked and given a thumping.
Especially those who have been publicly identified by the filth media as being members of the ‘virus denier cults’. Its getting like the Salem Witch Trials here.
Hope your part of Australia is somewhat more sane than this part.
I had a look across Channel 7 news in Australia and it rivals the BBC for propaganda.
Like everywhere else in the world they are claiming people are testing positive and dying of Covid19.
The virus they claim to exist is Sars Cov2 and the disease is the pneumonia claimed to be Covid19.
Saying that someone is testing positive for Covid19 through a PCR test is false.
Just because they claim you have the virus doesn’t mean you have the disease.
Do people in Australia and everywhere else not know the difference?
Pneumonia is diagnosed by X ray of lungs and Complete Blood Test.
How many of those that died of claimed Covid19 have had the diagnosis using the above method.
I read an article a few weeks ago where someone in Australia did a freedom of information request asking if Sars Cov2 has been isolated in Australia and how accurate where the tests.
The response was there is no evidence it was isolated and the tests are not 100% accurate.
I take it that information didn’t make its way into the Australian media.
Thank you! Of course that info doesn’t get anywhere near a MSM outlet, and the big majority of Aussies get there news from… the presstitutes.
Yeah, I actually saw that Freedom Of Information request today on my newsfeed. Several people have posted it now. Again, that will be suppressed by the media. I know about the PCR tests as well.
Channel 9 morning news did an interview with a lady who was refused entry at a shop for not wearing a mask, and as soon as she bought up all the false positive tests in Florida, and how they had greatly exaggerated the ‘positive cases’ there, the hostile interviewer threw a wobbly and stopped the interview.
That is what we’re up against the most here: the media.
“It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be moulded until they clothe ideas and disguise.” ~ Joseph Goebbels
Good on that lady for speaking out.
It’s fear and the mistaken assumption that the government wouldn’t lie to us is why people are behaving as they are.
It’s the media, the politicians and bio terrorists masquerading as scientists that are the real virus.
When anyone in my social circle starts a conversation about the virus I ask the believers can they show me the evidence that the virus has been isolated and therefore proven to exist and the evidence that the virus causes the new pneumonia.
Until they do I won’t waste my time and energy on them.
Sars Cov2 and Covid19 is based on faith not evidence or any science. More like science fiction.
I believe ‘Australian’ media (ie the corporate outlets, not the independents) demonise HCQ, as in the UK and US, and that Australian authorities punish severely doctors trying to use it. But independent doctors and crusaders have the global data on how HCQ cocktails are stopping pandemic and most fatalities around the world, yet get censored by big tech for doing so. Posters should note that there is zero financial or political motive for promoting HCQ, but 21 billion reasons for big Pharma to demonise it, as Dr James Todaro explains here:
https://omnij.org/Gilead:_Twenty-one_billion_reasons_to_discredit_hydroxychloroquine_(ORIGINAL_ARTICLE)
Thanks for the link Nic. There is a really good independent media site in Australia called Tott News which has been covering the panicdemic from the get go, as well as Max Igan from The Crowhouse who is on Bitchute.
I still believe this whole agenda is about much more than vaccines, and is about instituting total control via health immunity passports (Covi Pass) biometric id, a social credit system whereby if you don’t have a health immunity passport, you will be denied access to places like cafes or cinema’s and even employment as a politician stated clearly here back in June.
And further to that, a global digital currency will be bought in.
Hope your weekend is good.
There’s an assumption that our official voices of medicine and science are rational, since their technology is strictly an outgrowth of “rational” advance, or developments.
But the vicissitudes of spirit –both good and bad– can often trump reason, at times (like these, need I say it? Lol)
“Faith can sometimes militate even against reason.”
There may be flaws in my formulation of that, but I add it for its important suggestiveness.
What I don’t get is that Youtube/ Google, Facebook and Facebook themselves were all banned in China, then why aren’t they better themselves?
Censoring calls for terrorism ok, but that’s it.
Maybe they think they themselves have a near monopoly outside of China? In that case millions should shift to alternative web applications.
and Twitter.
As the saying goes “Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas.” Big Tech has been in bed with government operatives (and perhaps financed by same) for so long now that they have no choice but to tow the official line – even if they didn’t agree with it, which is unlikely.
In America at least, there has always been censorship; but except for the McCarthy Era, it’s always been Censorship Lite: the fist in the velvet glove. Now the glove’s come off again, as it had in the 1950s.
Who is superior, do you think, Big Tech, or the politicians they ‘persuade’ to defend them and prevent the desperately needed break up of their monopoly on public discussion and political opinion? Do posters agree that private corporations have the right to censor all those with opinions offensive to the owners and allies of big tech, even elected presidents?
Like many corporations, Big Tech are controlled by the Globalists and are used as tools in the attempted takeover of humanity. Depending on the situational requirements, they use a variety of tools and in a variety of ways. But at some point the foreign connections will be exposed and the execs will be charged with treason; and that is why they’re panicking.
And it’s not just Big Tech or top executives:
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/harvard-prof-charged-false-statements-failing-report-income-wuhan-university
Harvard Prof Charged With False Statements, Failing To Report Income From Wuhan University Of Technology
by Tyler Durden – Wed, 07/29/2020
This independent critic is documenting the many Chinese academics in the US exposed for their theft of US scientific knowledge on behalf of the CCP. It’s a shocking story, especially for those seeing the US as the great threat to global peace and wellbeing.
https://mobile.twitter.com/cabot_phillips/status/1262441045197049856
This is two years old and I can’t believe I’ve not seen it before now. And Bannon is clear that it’s not just “economic” war.
Bannon: We’re at an economic war with China
Jul 18, 2018
CNBC International TV
Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon speaks with CNBC’s Michelle Caruso-Cabrera at the Delivering Alpha conference.
I can’t make sense of this post antonym.
It was all very quiet in our home. I might have had Planet Rock, on in our kitchen very low, as I was cooking but I had nothing on in my mancave in the back room…where I have all my toys..and I heard this gentle drumming, and I knew it was live.
It was my wife doing her meditative drumming in the front room, on a couple of little drums, we bought home from somewhere on our travels…and I never thought my wife like me, had any musical talent whatsover – but her drumming was really good.
So I didn’t say much, and ordered this extremely georgeous Hand Carved African Drum, for her Birthday Present a month before.
I thought she would tell me off for spendng so much money. could hardly hide it..She said Wow That’s Beautiful.
So Now, I can Play it too.and have been tonight – with two hands with it strapped very close to my face. I just play it with my fingers of both hands, and wander around our house with it…just like playing piano, with all my fingers and a lot of the notes..
We might have been inspired a bit, by both The Drummers of Burundi and our local English Pagan Drummers – in fact I asked one of them – total hairy punk – ever been to Africa mate…he says no, this is a lot older than that..This is English Pagan Drumming
I never thought i could do it, even a bit…but if you don’t try you won’t know, and I can. I know I bought it for my wife, but its my drum now.
I walk around and Play It with my fingers and my thumbs and my finger and thumbs nails – don’t have them too long, and don’t cut them too short. the fingernails on the skin of the drum is very important….I can even make the sound of my African drum sound a bit like Hawkwind with my fingernails and I never expected that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SSxrEgltJc
Tony
Oh deffo a like if even just for the Hawkwind reference. Go crazy Tony, isn’t it stunning sounds tho, my girlfriend mentions the drums rhythm significance in pagan sexual rituals from the 70s.
Opa-loka to you dear fellow 👍
Just a simple fact will answer this question completely;
Google was funded way before it’s official inception by US intelligence agencies in order to collect, analyse and control the new era of digital information way before anyone knew what the fuck was going on. The US government particularly had their fingers in all the pies funding new startups and investing in products for the intelligence agencies and computer science. Before people knew what a bookmark was or HTML or a hyperlink a download the founding technology which makes up our digital lives today was being backed by government agencies in order to dominate the information warfare environment before anyone had any idea. The entire backbone of our digital lives was founded on the premise that eventually the world would become digital and that the exhaust fumes from our digital lives would prove valuable in harvesting, analysing and then manipulating in order to influence political agendas and control the population.
Do you really think governments were going to sit back as the internet formed into an uncontrollable world of it’s own, untapped and unrealized in it’s potential? Come on now, think about it. Of course not! They had to take control just like they did with alcohol, drugs etc. They had a plan since the 70s/80s to capitlize on the evolving computer sciences and what would become of the personal computer, the internet, and later on when the idea of the WWW came along and internet access became much more readibly available.
If you think this was all a fluke and Google magically appeared on your computer screen without any influence from the powers that be you really need to wake up. Google was being pushed onto the world in a time when people knew nothing about the new emerging technology that encompassed it. And that naivety has only just began to become recognizable in a slow turn towards awakening and privacy, security and data protection and from the slumber which has made many companies like Google, Facebook and all the other big data giants empires and thus able to influence our daily lives. And behind this influence? Just like it always has been.. Well, of course! Your very own government!
It’s weird how household brands are now showing their true colours in a time of alleged crisis rolling back their democratic, fair and equal policies in order to adjust happily to the new reality created by the Colin 19 virus, or is it the Catherine 19 virus? I know it begins with C. Or is it weird? I think not. Now you see where the power lies. And thats why YouTube are pulling rank slowly until they have absolute power over information flowing on their platform. Hence the change in policy to reflect the totalatarian ideologies the Cricket 19 virus has helped put into place.
Stop using the platform. Simple. They have control when they have no audience to listen to them 😉
Fantastic comment – thanks. Now they’re almost ready for the final phase: not merely censoring platforms, but the internet itself.
So you soon won’t be able to watch a James Corbett video on You Tube – big deal! You can watch it on his own web site. That is, until Google et al make it impossible to connect with his own web site. We know that’s coming, it’s the logical next step in the censorship regime. Censoring platforms is just the baby first step.
Exactly it. Eventually your social credit score will determine whether you can access the internet. And you will be forever monitored for wrongthink. Welcome to the world of total top-down control.
The social credit system has been developed and adopted by the CCP, and it is the political allies and big tech friends of communist China in the US, like Bill Gates and Joe Biden, who dream of imposing it on us all. They never protest nor even mention Chinese concentration camps and organ harvesting from Muslims and Tibetans, that’s for sure. It might threaten their huge profits and investments with Beijing. But all parties mentioned never stop criticising Trump, the only leader to truly oppose them all (Congress sometimes pretends to). So If you oppose such ‘progress’, if you really want to fight growing totalitarianism, always support free speech and get on the Trump train.
The Internet is unbreakable – unless there is no electricity.
It is hardwired. But has been building backdoors into it – hence Hauwei
The Web which sits on top of it – can be turned ‘off’, ‘gated’ and hence controlled – just like the hard media which still sells everything from sugar to children to children to sugar daddies.
But these who are savvy enough can always bypass the gated communities and its DNS servers and Malware (Vault 7) – human craftiness/evil knows no bounds.
AI will be being trained up to sniff out the dissenters and sponsored baiting sites are used to attract the moths to their flame!
They who live by the sword …
I can’t understand if you support those ‘savvy enough’ to beat the internet crackdown, or if you welcome their entrapment by ‘baiting sites’.
You are not in charge of the ISP you connect to and therefore you have no influence over the politics that goes on behind the scenes and if you know anything you’ll know that ISPs are continuously forced to comply with government policies. This means ISPs can practically do as they please so long as they have the backing of the big cheese behind them. We saw this with the Snowden revelations and how ISPs were complicit in allowing the surveillance of millions and millions and millions of people worldwide, thanks to government policies. What makes you think they wouldn’t pull the plug if ordered? What makes you think they can’t eavesdrop on your communications? They can do ALL THIS and loads more very easily. In other countries where non-Western idealogies reign supreme and access to the internet is not considered a fundamental right they reguarly cut access to the internet. In some countries they opt to install certificates which allow encrypted data communications to be intercepted and traffic manipulated as and when necessary bypassing any soft modifications that shield whatever it is you are doing.
You mention DNS but all this does is redirect traffic to a different DNS server and not that of your ISP so that names that are resolved to IPs are not stored with your ISP before moving on to their intended destination. A private DNS server doesn’t stop much and sure as shit does not anonymize your traffic in the slightest. Your IP is still your IP address only now you are resolving web addresses with another DNS solution and therefore increasing your privacy (if you trust the DNS server you are using!).
Malware. The fact you even mention malware proves how vulnerable networks and computer systems are. If a bad guy can use malware dont you think threat actors as per government affiliation can also use malware? They do use malware, very sophisicated malware. When they shut down an adversarys network and systems dont you think this can very easily be adjusted to take down critical infrastructure sites responsible for sending global internet traffic along the wire? Western governments have control over criticial internet infrastructure around the world. There are sites across the world that are of the highest values to the powers that be as they (bundles and bundles of fibre optic cable that span the sea floor) contain the worlds internet traffic.
Computers and networks are innately vulnerable. They were both made in a time when there was no dire need to put extensive security and privacy before everything else. The very first example of the internet was in fact a relatively small network that consisted of several nodes of which every system administrator knew the other admins on the network, and so there was NO need to hide behind a fortress. It was NEVER intended to be that way. As for computers, they are dumb inanimate objects that without human interaction and programming specifically would be useless. They still are pretty much useless on their own today and even with AI getting better every year we are still nowhere near a time in human history where computers can run the world on their own without intervention from us mere monkeys. So they are dumb. They follow instructions (this is what programming languages are for). That is it. There are endless amounts of attack vectors for computer systems and networks. Entire careers are based off many years of learning stuff like this at a very HIGH level (and a very high pay check to boot) and still with all the talent and know-how we cannot prevent attacks and we cannot defend effectively enough when the time comes and the attack is sophisicated enough to cause some real damage.
So think about it for a second. If someone wanted to fuck with your entire street and their computers and bring their digital worlds crashing down they could do and very easily too. Just extend this by a magnitude of untold amounts and you’re at the capability of entire countries and equally getting closer if not on par with said countries the big tech giants themselves who invest HUGE amounts of money into securing their infrastructure and therefore have the power not just to turn the lights back on after an attack but also to turn the lights out too, if they wanted to. They are furthermore in bed with government as per agreements that ensure both receive handsome benefits from the others access to resources and leverage over society as a whole.
Sadly this has been the case for decades now. Governments knew how pivotal it was in ensuring they had control over critical infrastructure like the internet and as much as loads of funding was thrown into ensuring the world could get online the hidden motives behind it also made sure to benefit the authorities. And so today the entire backbone of the internet is privy to being part of the huge network we call the internet which is controlled by a huge majority who have access to what goes on behind the scenes.
Agreed, and a well written paper by Mile Mathis on Bill Gates suggests this too. So called self labeled geniuses such as Gates, Zuckerberg, Musk, Jobs etc, just pop out of nowhere, right… They are installed as the front men, usually because they have powerful family backgrounds. Most if not all of Hollywood actors are the same. It’s Google job to promote this garbage a fact.
Lets face it. Do you think a spotty kid call Mark Zuckerberg is a allowed to launch a global social tracking platform that violates just about every singe civil liberty. Do you really believe this would get the ok without it being backed by intelligence.
Anyway, I found Miles papers informative and over the years he has ripped into just about every event as a hoax. Believe it or not what does it matter, history is just a story by someone who wants you to think a certain way. So in my opinion all the stuff in the main stream is bullshit.
http://mileswmathis.com/gates.pdf
I strongly suspect Miles Mathis is running a MOSSAD deep pysops. According to this sock puppet , the entire Western civilization was actually the product of Jews. Apparently Europeans themselves contributed very little to Western civilization other than fall for the Jewish tricks. According to Miles Mathis, there does not exist a single non-Jewish European of any account, whether in science, arts, or politics.
His “Proofs” are free associating with names and usually a large section of his documents is an endless mushing of names that are supposed to prove something. JUST STRIP OUT ALL THE FREE ASSOCATION CRAP and see what’s left of these papers. How many of you actually retrace his geneology steps and verify? 1%? 0%. I’d say zero percent.
His latest output has “Hussein” and “Nasser” as a code word for “Jew”! Relying on the ignorance of his audiance who likely do not know that Hussein are symbolic names for Shia and Nasser for Arab Nationalism, respectively. I wonder which “phoenician” intelligence service would smear the names of these very important personages.
Like all other disinfo agents before him, he does mix truth with fiction. That DoD and intelligence were the original and likely remain the main sponsors of Silicon Valley has been covered in detail for years, without using “Geneology” and “Oh, look at his nose!” methodology of the GRADUATED “ART STUDENT”, mr. Miles, with the always working, always fast servers!
Hey Miles, btw noticed just like the “Langley boys in the basement” you too now have an army of “helpers” producing cookie cutter products. Btw, did you know Miles that there is FOOTAGE of LIndberg landing in Paris? Care you retract your silly paper on that one? (Just one example)
Perhaps, and it has crossed my mind he could be a spook for some of the reason you state. That said, im just surfing through life reading material as I go to pass the time of day. I really don’t have a dog in the fight. The papers he produces are far more stumulating for my mind than the BBC, CNN, Wiki or any other half witted puppet show served up for the plebs.
Corporate media cannot be trusted. Their reports and news priorities must constantly be compared with the independent sites, which include the critical information and alternative perspectives the corporates invariably omit. After a few weeks of doing this, you soon realise that corporate outlets almost always sing from one hymn sheet, so much so that reports their ‘journalists’ access common ‘briefing and coordination’ networks with a specific political agenda seem very credible. They also hide their many outrageous mistakes and do little investigative reporting anymore, except of their political targets. Journalists once existed to inform citizens about abuse by the rich and powerful; today they are much more concerned to misinform and reform the troublesome dumb plebs on behalf of powerful ruling elites.
Thank you for the link, miles w mathis is certainly fearless
Brilliant! Remember: Google was not the first search engine of the web. Netscape was, then came Yahoo. Both got pushed out of the market.Mobile phones: Nokia, Erikson, Siemens had a huge headstart. Blackberry was the brand. Then everything had to shift to Android. Mail order business has been around for while. But mail order business over the web plus tax evasion brought us Amazon and killed off the competitors and half of Main Street,too. Somehow capitalism’s rules don’t seem to apply to Big Tech. There’s a reason, I’m sure.
Capitalism or free market economies frequently get corrupted by powerful monopoly interests. Capitalism itself is simply an economic system without any political agenda. It is inanimate and so free of purpose and intention. But the zillionaire execs of big tech and big Pharma, for example, are very human and most certainly do have political and financial reasons for controlling and exploiting us all. For example, demonising capitalism won’t prevent giant corporations like Gilead profiting from its much touted but almost useless new drug against Covid-19, Remdesivir. It’s price per patient will be $3,200 (paid for by….?), compared to about $10 dollars per patient for the highly effective HCQ. No wonder Gilead worked so hard to publish fake research rubbishing HCQ in the Lancet, now withdrawn thanks to the investigative efforts by crusaders like Dr James Todaro. He spends his time showing the world how corporate and MSM lies are killing us, not complaining about capitalism.
https://omnij.org/Gilead:_Twenty-one_billion_reasons_to_discredit_hydroxychloroquine_(ORIGINAL_ARTICLE)
Netscape is not a search engine. Netscape is Mozilla is Firefox.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape_Navigator
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browsers/
Agreed. Here in the UK we should all stop paying the BBC “licence fee” for their garbage. Did it years ago and the brain is working perfectly now.
Good post but we should beware treating ‘US intelligence agencies’ as synonymous with ‘US government’. The entire 4 year saga of the Trump administration is based on its battle to gain control over the deep state or ‘swamp’, of which the totally unelected and unaccountable intelligence community is very much a part. Nobody ever voted for the CIA or FBI, but there are mountains of evidence that these agencies seek to control politicians, policies and entire administrations, as well as foment and fund the endless neo-con wars of intervention which ordinary Americans want ended, and a key reason they voted Trump. Patriotic US families don’t want their sons coming home in body bags anymore. Intelligence agencies don’t give a damn.
The CIA have ran the US for decades. They use their US arms power to rape and pillage their way across the globe.They’re well organised and connected. Mossad are their evil Twin.Unfortunately, no president will dare to stand up.And no president has the integrity to turn down the hush money. How many times has Trump mentioned the ‘swamp’ since it helped him into power ?And whoever wins the next election there can rest assured that the swamp has been buried underneath another swamp thanks to the deaths of Epstein and his friends (and his’ black book ‘ ).Anyone who may have been getting nervous can rest now.All skeletons have been buried.Business will continue as normal. Uncle Sam will swagger and flex his muscles as normal. But there comes a a time when the school bully eventually hits a brick wall and ends up on his back.Nobody’s good fortune lasts forever.
a few specifics :
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/07/27/facebook-censors-viral-video-of-doctors-capitol-hill-coronavirus-press-conference/#
https://www.bitchute.com/video/71W1O4TdJxo0/
thanks covidiot..good find..let’s spread that..
Jesus. The must be what it felt like in Germany during the rise of the Nazi Party. There is absolutely nothing we can do to stop this train until it has run its course. I’ve talked to people until I’m blue in the face and it makes no difference. People just aren’t waking up because real science is distorted and/or entrenched in political views or they can’t. Until about 10 years ago I was just as zealous about my positive views on vaccines. There were many other out of the mainstream opinions I was very familiar with(i.e. moon landing, 9/11, JFK, even Big Pharma), but I always thought vaccines were rock solid. Until ten years ago. I guess I understand to a slight degree the disconnect people have, but for chsitsakes, now it is destroying the world and will be the end of many lives. The laziness is astounding and will be punished. It sucks to have the foreknowledge and be trapped at the same time. I’d almost rather be oblivious. Almost.
I feel the same, sadly. Every day feels more difficult.
I, too, knew nothing about vaccines. No children so no dog in that fight.
But since Cora 19 (I love Cricket’s take andi intend to use it) I have learned A LOT. I have listened to Polly Tommey and Bobby Kennedy Jrs “Truth” episodes, watched VAXXED and VAXXED II (and highly recommend them) and read Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and Catherine Austin Fitts daily.
I will never get another flu shot and am sorry I started to over 14 years ago. And, like others, I am looking ahead to negotiating a life as a member of the “unwashed” – I will not take the Carla 19 vaccination.
It’s certain that vaccines will benefit big Pharma by billions, but very uncertain that they will work or be safe for those forced to pay for them via taxation’s. Big Pharma exists to care about the former, not the latter. As this critic and hero writes, there are in fact “21bn reasons” why big pharma wants HCQ demonised and outlawed.
https://omnij.org/Gilead:_Twenty-one_billion_reasons_to_discredit_hydroxychloroquine_(ORIGINAL_ARTICLE)
Almost everything we were told as normies is a lie. It’s truly frightening to wake up but it’s better. We at least have a chance of avoiding what’s coming. The normies are lemmings walking off the cliff.
This is true, hence the massive push back against the truth. It’s taken me years to digest everything. I only held on to a Few choice establishment stories, probably subconsciously for some stability. I can’t imagine swallowing all of this at once.
I had many sleepless nights upon finding new information. And a sort of semi-permanent shell-shocked demeanour. It rips your world apart. I can see why most people would rather stay asleep – which is not to say I agree with their decision, I simply understand it.
Let’s warn them
Well recently I’ve been recording my comments getting deleted (including from here on my YouTube channel)and if you’re positive about not wanting to bomb China or mention the Jews you get spelled within 18 seconds and I record all my contentious comments and wait 18 seconds while refreshing the screen and then I watch it vanish and now covid gets you deleted
Rappoport must be uncomfortable reading for the cronyvirus zealots. Here’s another one on “The Test”.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/07/29/another-failure-of-the-covid-diagnostic-test/
They wouldn’t dream of reading it, and in any case they just don’t care. They are going for bust, and if they don’t get absolutely everything they dream of getting, they’ll be happy with 50% of it.
That’s what this whole covid “pandemic” hysteria is all about: They are trying it on to see how far we will let them go. They hope, in their wildest dreams, for total control, but they don’t think 50% control would be so terrible either.
Our job is to get their control down to zero.
0 would be wonderful. But no signs of that happening here where I live. EVERYONE is in lockstep.
But I will try to do my part to get to 0.
All we can do is speak out.
NHS staff have this duty.
We can all do our best to seize every opportunity.
Sad news in Iceland today – a very reasonable country in many respects – where they have decided to revive the 2-metre rule, ban meetings of more than 100 people and raise the official danger level from “worthy of attention” to “dangerous”, due to ONE “case” being admitted to the national hospital today.
Of course we are not even told whether the individual concerned is actually sick, or has something in his blood, or is just being tested because he coughed a couple of times in a public place…
However, there is also the good news that I went shopping today and didn’t see a single mask, nobody was respecting the 2-metre rule, nor was anybody counting to see whether they were in a crowd of 100 or 500 people… 🙂
Honestly, it would be better for real human beings to live on a volcanic island in a geologically very unstable part of Indonesia than to put up with this Life-Lockdown in so-called civilized society…
In HBO’s wonderful ‘Chernobyl’, we see how the entire Soviet system was built on lies and how those benefitting from and subservient to communism defended these lies until the horrible truth of how their system caused a national global disaster finally caught up with them. I see similar dynamic today concerning the battle fo4 truth over HCQ. Those defending the lie that it doesn’t work and so help deny doctors and patients the right to use it will be totally disgraced as the truth finally prevails. Like the Soviet officials, they will have caused many 1000s of unnecessary deaths and enormous pain and grief by their immoral actions.
https://omnij.org/Gilead:_Twenty-one_billion_reasons_to_discredit_hydroxychloroquine_(ORIGINAL_ARTICLE)
Fill yer boots! The lucrative business of funny money. You can even do it on one knee and with a muzzle . . .
https://www.anti-empire.com/what-great-recession-jpmorgan-hits-all-time-highest-quarterly-revenue-thanks-to-fed/
A confession: I went grocery shopping this morning at Grocery Outlet, and for the first time wore The Muzzle. The whole fifteen minutes felt like sh!t, and mark my words: I’m not doing it again.
C.
If I have to wear a mask to be able to get basic provisions and going to wear one of those big 3M industrial masks with the two filters on them. Like you wear in construction when you are cutting concrete. This should be enough to make a statement. May even get a yellow vest with “I’m Covid Safe” printed on the back.
To add to all this nonsence. I visited a Subway the the other day for a takeaway. The poor teenage girl had a shirt on with “Sandwich Artist” printed on the back. A “Covid Marshal” printed on the front. Takes me back to my school days when they would select milk monitors.
Oh my Gawd. Milk monitors!! I never got chosen and don’t think I’ve ever gotten over it.
I probably questioned the Catechism that day or something.
This should be enough to make a statement.
people might assume that you think the standard obedience muzzles offer insufficient protection. make sure that there’s no way your statement can be misunderstood.
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=plague+doctor+mask
Why the censorship ?…..I think we all know the why, because YT is an extremely popular platform with an enormous audience – therefore…anything that questions the psychological operation that is Ctsarvid, is deemed a menace to the project – they want it as customarily spread as butter is on the breakfast toast.
I wonder how many extra staff/robots they have to employ to check for the millions of awkward questions which sane human beings are still asking…
It’s actually quite fun to cruise the comments on serious issues there. A great many of them show considerable common sense – along with the criminal ignorance, of course.
I think theres only one that does most of the filtering/calculating – called Algo Rithm…but does have relation to a Ted Slant, of course, they’re both predisposed toward their Big Brother.
🙂
Those saying HCQ is dangerous (despite its very safe record saving millions since1955) don’t get banned from social media. But experts and doctors saying HCQ is a life-saver frequently do. This week, the frontline US doctors whose first-hand accounts of losing no covid-19 patients thanks to immediate prescription of HCQ cocktails with zinc and an antibiotic were simultaneously banned by YouTube, Facebook and Google. Now what rational person would ban doctors explaining how to save more lives? And what evil entity would pay them to lie, anyway? Using and promoting HCQ certainly can’t earn money for anyone, as it’s been off-patent for many years. By contrast, big Pharma giant Gilead stands to gain $3,200 every time a patient gets treated with its new drug Remdesivir, which critics say hardly works at all. As HCQ only costs around $10 per patient, Gilead has excellent reasons for denigrating it, and funding the fake research which smears it. Youtube et al seem very unworried by all that.
https://omnij.org/Gilead:_Twenty-one_billion_reasons_to_discredit_hydroxychloroquine_(ORIGINAL_ARTICLE)
I’ve thought about this again.
I think it’s clear that Google, Microsoft, Windows, Twitter , Facebook, ‘Insta’ etc are all sponsored quietly by the Governments of( mainly) the US and UK. But the bonus of the www is that anyone can monitor it.How many hackers and spies did Obama hire as soon as he invaded Washington ?
So, they began to ban comments and videos in April that asked questions and offered alternative opinions that didn’t fit the official narrative agreed by the world’s leaders and population haters.
The first that made the news were criticized as they comprised ideas or theories that are ” medically unsubstantiated”. I see. So the public who were mainly unqualified in medicine or virology couldn’t substantiate their hypothesizing. Whereas as the doctors and virologists- erm..couldn’t substantiate theirs either.But they were never considered as anything other than gospel.Don’t ban them….
Once Youtube started, the others followed. A united front. Except it wasn’t. It was the decisions and actions of one entity using more than 4 channels to make it look more ‘unanimous’. The bonus was it gave excellent exposure to the terrified establishment who are scared witless of conspiracy theorists . They love to ‘expose’ their nuttiness with mainstream bullshit like this. It reinforces those who have no time to think or make up their own minds because they have to sort their selfies and quotes out.
It amuses me how rabid the mainstream are concerning people they consider beneath contempt and unworthy of commenting about. The same clowns then invest millions making endless documentaries about the ‘biggies’ ( JFK . Moon landing , 9/11) just to blow the whistle on the whistleblowers. The end results are hilarious. Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK with three bullets shot from three locations within 7 seconds, building 7 died of fright, and we catapulted tin can to the moon because the decade was about to end and the Americans had been promised at the beginning..
When this covid thing hit i read the PDF on it. The one that was withdrawn PDQ because it said too much.Far too much. And it had a good chance of inadvertently dragging Fauci’s skeletons out of their cupboards.
It would seem that those who hate the immune systems with it’s determination to sustain us and keep us from dying were none too pleased. HIV had tried ; AIDS had tried. Gallo and Fauci mad e a killing( really) draining the pharma of cash before releasing the information that could have saved millions of lives.
But those conspiracy nuts wouldn’t let it go would they- so they got bans to hide their curiosity from others. But what of those medically qualified ?
Luc Antoine Montagnier appeared on the French cable TV show, CNews, on April 17, 2020. He has a nobel peace prize for Physiology. He stated that the virus that causes COVID-19 is manmade and that elements of HIV and Plasmodium falciparum, a parasite that causes malaria, are found in the coronavirus’s genome.
”“We were not the first since a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study which showed that the complete genome of this coronavirus [has] sequences of another virus, which is HIV.”
The research that Montagnier refers to was posted on the science website Biorxiv January 31, 2020, and has since been withdrawn.
So it isn’t just conspiracy theorists who get silenced. So do doctors if they don’t echo the government, patent collectors or software magnates.
”The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.”
This woujld fit in nicely with the decision of the NIH to allow GOF ( gain of function) research to be re-instated and funded in 2018. Gain of Function is when a virus or hybrid of viruses are given a ‘leg up’ by man rather than wait 5 or 6 hundred years for it to evolve and cross from species to species.
Montagnier’s observations told him that covid 19 derives from a failed HIV vaccine.
At that time WuHan were working in tandem with North Carolina University trying to ( apparently) find a vaccine to destroy SARS. As we remember, December 2019, saw Charles Lieber arrested by the FBI and he denied having anything to do with Wuhan and he was only a nano technologist at Harvard.He also forgot to disclose his ties to Gates, his funding from Gates or his ten years working for Wuhan and being paid big money.Shortly after we got the pandemic and Lieber didn’t face a charge.It pays to be part of the deep state boys club.
In the meantime, Montagnier’s ( and Monatagnier and Perez) assertion of covid being created by men in lab coats has received growing support in the medical community.So this global chaos is down to men. What was their real intention.Well, given that they want the world less populated, it’s likely to be another culling exercise that places it firmly in the category of bio-weaponry. So now we have it- we’re the enemy.
On the bright side- Montagnier’s study of it all leads him to conclude that it’s natural span will lead to it’s own demise. It will die of natural causes. Which is probably what it’s trying to do now ; die in peace. But the Government have invested a lot of time. money and hope into this.They won’t let it. Not just yet anyway.
Youtube is speaking for Governments- not for Youtube. They are not two different things.They just appear to be- that;’s why people use it in their millions. But, for them to state categorically that covid 19 does exist- without showing anything much to support the assertion, and that people have definitely died of it, tells me that they know it was a real thing and not a theory.Know– not speculate.And the only way they can claim irrefutable knowledge about something nobody else can see or isolate suggests they know because they were the ones who commissioned the demons to create it in the first place.
Good comment, Jura Calling. I would differ on one point. It seems pretty clear to me that there is a level above ‘governments’. The US/UK are just the best known shop fronts for a supra-national oligarchy getting the unwitting public on side via the bought and paid for MSM and their collaborating ‘journalists’ Countries, governments, individuals seeking to go a different way are destroyed.
Thanks Robyn, I agree. Since we were announced as winners of WW1 and WW2 we have been the leaders of the free world.The ‘good guys’. Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini,etc were all very naughty boys.And as for those nasty Nazis..
The swaggering partnerships of the UK and US front men and women have been sickening eve since.They’re everything that’s wrong about capitalism, and the west.And don’t stat me on Israel, their script writers..
Absent angelic protection.
Often in a variety of guises.
What did the Apostle advise as hospitality? “Be not unmindful of strangers, for many have so entertained angels unawares.” Close to that.
They often say variety is the spice of life, but I say it’s angels. All right then, maybe a variety of angels. Same difference, in angelic terms.
£4£&$4$~~~~~
“Angels fly because they can take themselves lightly.”. ~~ GKC
‘Governments’ is vague. How can a bunch of ‘governments’ run things? Governments are ran by a mafia which has many of its agents in all tentacles. There’s only one group with enough power to do that.
Not really, Mr Priest….
Governments govern. They govern how the world ticks from town to town, city to city, country to country.That doesn’t mean they made the rules or that they own the places they govern. Like shops need managers and a hierarchy, so too do nations. How they promise to govern persuades us to vote for or against. That’s how we manage to keep believing we live in a democracy. We take part and our choices appear to effect change.That keeps us satisfied.It makes us feel a little free for a change.
There has only been one government who run the world. The NWO isn’t on it’s way, it’s been pulling strings for well over a century.The Bilderbergers meet behind closed doors every couple of years to discuss and decide which direction the world will be going in until the next sit down. The bankers own the world and us. The governments are the ‘shop managers’.They take their orders and come to us and deliver the BS.And the dance goes on..
Yes, but you are missing a common thread. Who has risen to such power, and how? You want to believe it’s a bunch of individuals all banding together over money and power? There is more at play here. Try reading the Bible.
Like millions who witnessed genocide in two world wars and then two illegal Iraqi ‘conflicts’ and the millions who see millions of Africans die innocent, I read the Bible a long time ago.Recently I’ve read comment sections telling us all to basically insert our heads up our dark place and not to worry as ‘we win the end’ and then quote some book from the Bible.Pointless and lazy.It’s a book.
I believe in a power of good and one of evil and recognise each easily.I know what it’s doing and who oils the cogs.There’s no religion in this war.It’s a war being waged on the corporeal level and within three dimensions.
I know much is being made of 666 and the ‘mark of the beast’ right now.I was investigating that a long time before we had the internet and fake terror attacks.gates et al are aware of all the ‘clues’ in the Book of Revelation and are using them as an in joke and watching the online panic.They call that humour. What he and the others are bringing in is close to the antichrist story, but people are missing a vital couple of other clues.
What clues?
Jura, this independent critic is carefully reporting what the MSM ignore: the many cases of Chinese academics at US universities now being and arrested for spying and stealing US science secrets. You may be interested….
https://mobile.twitter.com/cabot_phillips/status/1262441045197049856
Noted and bookmarked. Thanks NicS
Even if the WHO had been 100% accurate in its virus predictions prior to Covid-19, each situation is different. Science is never settled, especially when a new strain of virus attacks humans with a potential to reach pandemic levels.
The anti-misinformation rule sets up Google as the definer of truth. It is powerful tool of Google and of Lewis Carroll’s Queen of Hearts.
I have an idea, why don’t we use the AIDS virus model of ‘treat but never cure’ medicine, but with more ambition, by demanding the entire world population pay billions, eventually trillions to the US, for a yearly vaccine, which cures nothing, but claims to prevent Covid, but can be adapted to create all kinds of mayhem in the worlds population, as required, as well as forming the basis for of a world ‘tax’ on every citizen, payable to US Empire via the drug companies. Like a Protection racket, with the threat of a virus hanging over those who do not pay.
The psychopaths are busy thinking the unthinkable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyebLSgmrOI
Investigation: C0VlD Positive Results for People Who Were Never Given Tests?
Dr. Pam Popper(Ohio, USA) is following up on this also. She is asking people who have experienced no test but positive results, with proof, to contact her.
— for which purpose, it would be useful to have contact information.
[email protected]
I watch her daily videos by typing in Pam Popper in search engine.
I largely gave up uploading stuff to youtube, several years ago, when I got this rather unfriendly message. I admit, I may have done it a couple of times this year before this ridiculous lockdown, but only because I thought it would be appreciated, by the subject of the contents, that I had personally recorded (I have several local back ups of that)
I of course still watch youtube, and even the Old Grey Whistle Test, but so far as I am concerned – you can delete all my content, that I personally recorded, but do not delete the old BBC Archives of people like Neil Young.
The BBC’s only value now, so far as I can see – is their music, art and wildlife archives.
Keep that, and delete the rest.
Most importantly – Keep The Analogue Stuff on Film…and Paper – The Photographs
Everything on computer media, is likely to be blasted to hell, and it may be a non-human event…
Have you looked into the sky recently?
You may think that Our Sun God is quiet….
If the sun stops shining – even a bit, it is likely to get very cold in winter in England – eg.. the Thames freezes over
Or if the Sun gets perky, she might spray all these nasty hot things at us, which wil stop nearly all our telecommunications working
Does anyone think any being we know, has any control or influence on the Sun?
Have you seen the size of our Universe?
Come on. Lets us humans do our Best to Get On, Rather than Social Distance
We can’t compete with The Sun.
I love it. She builds up my Vitamin D, but I don’t take too much at once, but know when I am feeling well.
Thanks Sun
This is 10 year old schoolboy real science, (before the Americans Didn’t Land on The Moon) yeh, I thought they did too, cos I saw it live on the Telly in 1969. I lost her, but we swapped records when we were young. I geve her Led Zeppellin (she knew I wanted it back) She gave me Neil Young, and then she was gone.. I had lost my love, but she inspired me to find another…..
“Neil Young – Heart Of Gold (Live at the BBC 1971)”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkGOrIBCcg4
Tony
“The BBC’s only value now, so far as I can see – is their music, art and wildlife archives.”
I would add to that their old kids tv programmes. Nostalgia for the over 40s.
The British government are now advertising on talk radio warning against ‘false’ Covid information and cautions about sharing ‘false’ information….it is very sinister.
And not just Talk Radio.
Given that it will have its controlled opposition, if UK Government is doing this then it would suggest a failure of containment, and that things are going very badly indeed. That YouTube is censoring videos is obviously related, but it’s not as significant as war time wireless style cautions from Nanny State about who not to believe.
Does it not remind you of East Germany, circa 1976? The Frontline Doctors SCOTUS press conference on the 27th in Washington – not only has the Doctors own website been removed, but the media is fully demonising them as cranks.
Even the filth media here in Australia is sticking the boot in bigtime.
“Does it not remind you of East Germany, circa 1976? ”
No, not really. I wasn’t there.
Hey, easy there, some of us have reputations to uphold.
Very creepy. Especially given that they are the main purveyors of false covid in formation.
They know your name because you told it to them.But they dont know where and they dont know when its coming.
The British government are now advertising on talk radio, warning against ‘false’ Covid information and cautioning against sharing said ‘false’ information…. it is very sinister.
What about the final sentence : “Don’t feed the beast”. I nearly crashed my car when I heard that ! Sinister as f..k
The ‘lockdown’ target is tightening: from the whole World to…..Countries…… State/County …….City……District …..Street…..House…..YOU.
We are currently at cities in the UK, (Oldham & Leicester) but they will get to you.
YouTube’s arse- kissing of oligarchy explained:
“Most modern freedom is at root fear. It is not so much that we are too bold to endure rules; it is rather that we are too timid to endure responsibilities.”
G.K. Chesterton
Being asked for your comment, and then being told that your comment is not acceptable, is ridiculous. The answer is, BOYCOTT the site…….The people who run lots of the Internet HATE Boycotts……..