The United Kingdom government has today announced its approval of the first Covid19 vaccine for general use. 800,000 doses are slated to be released for general use by the end of the week, and has already signed a contract for 40 million more doses (to go along with over 300 million doses of as-yet-unreleased vaccines from other companies).
With the newest phase in the Covid19 roll-out set to begin, it’s time we addressed the five biggest questions about this vaccine, its effectiveness, its safety and whether or not we’ll be forced to use it.
1. Does it work?
Clearly, the company claims it does, and the UK government seems to believe them. The Guardian, in their coverage of the vaccine, claim it has a 95% efficacy rating, but does not provide a source for this or any kind of data at all.
Fortunately, better journalists and researchers are writing for the British Medical Journal, including this piece from Peter Doshi just last week.
To explain where this “95% effective” claim actually comes from:
The Pfizer vaccine trial included nearly 44,000 people. Half getting their vaccine, half getting a placebo. In total, from the 44,000 people, 170 were later recorded as having become ‘infected with Covid19’. 162 of them were in the placebo group, 8 of them in the vaccine group.
The vaccine is therefore credited with preventing 154 cases of Covid19…or 95%.
You don’t need to be a medical researcher or virologist to see how potentially flawed this reasoning is. The entire trial of 44,000 people is deemed a success based on the potentially multi-variant outcome from less than 0.4% of those involved.
The details of the trial are hard to come by, so we have yet to find out how these 170 people were even diagnosed with “Covid19”. Was it a clinical diagnosis based on symptoms? Or PCR test? Either method would raise serious questions about accuracy.
In short, the answer to “Does it work?” is “we have no idea.”
2. Is it safe?
Potentially more important than the question of efficacy is the question of safety. No one, not even the vaccines most ardent defenders, is denying that this vaccine process has been rushed – vaccines typically take years and years to produce, whereas this one has been hurried on to the market in less than nine months. Some of them have skipped important stages in testing altogether.
Even supposing the short term trials have not shown any side effects, there has simply been no time to do long-term outcome studies. The potential for complications, months or years down the line, certainly exists.
Further, the vaccine is based on new technology – an mRNA vaccine, which injects viral genetic material to generate an immune response. The technology has been in development for years, but this would be the first mRNA vaccine actually put to use.
So, again, the short answer to “is it safe?” is “we don’t know”.
However, the vaccine pushers and manufacturers clearly have doubts about its safety, since they have gone out of their way guarantee they have total legal indemnity from prosecution or civil suits should something go wrong. Not a confidence booster that.
Ask yourself: if Ford or BMW were releasing a new type of car based on “cutting edge technology”, but before you buy one you have to sign a waiver saying you can’t sue the car manufacturers in the event you explode in a fiery ball of death…would you drive that car?
3. What’s in it?
This is a simple one. We don’t know, they won’t say. At least not in anything but the vaguest terms.
4. Who will get it?
First on the docket are the elderly and NHS workers. We don’t know who will be excluded. Immunocompromised people were excluded from the efficacy study, so presumably, they’ll also be excluded from taking the vaccine. If not, that’s a potential disaster waiting to happen (although they have legal protection, so I guess that doesn’t matter).
The British military are already busily setting up “mass vaccination centres”. So eventually, of course, almost everyone will be expected to get injected if they want to partake of society in any way at all. Which leads us onto question five…
5. Will it become mandatory?
The question of “mandatory vaccines” has been buzzing around since the earliest stages of the pandemic narrative. The final result will obviously vary country-to-country, but it’s certainly a possibility here in the UK.
A few months ago a group of scholars submitted written evidence to the UK Parliament that mandatory vaccinations would be defensible on a human rights basis, and that there was already legal precedent for this action in UK legislation (specifically, treating mental health patients who may be a danger to themselves).
In the end, and this is purely my speculation, I doubt the vaccine will ever be literally legally mandatory. Parliament will reject the “expert advice” suggesting Covid19 vaccines be forced on people.
This will accomplish two goals at once: a) It will give the government a veneer of “libertarianism”, a thin facade to cover it’s tyrannical nature. And b) It will allow a potential “third wave” of Covid19 to be blamed on “vaccine hesitancy”.
Though it will probably never be literally mandatory, they will certainly make it much easier to function should you get the vaccine.
There’s been much talk of “immunity passports”, meaning digital documents showing your vaccination status which make you exempt from lockdown and social distancing rules.
In the future it’s not hard to see these documents (either physical or digital) being vital to the ability work, socialise, travel, get loans, apply for state benefits or even receive medical treatment.
So, even if not forced to partake of the vaccine, you will likely be bribed, blackmailed or coerced into doing so eventually.
To sum up – we don’t know exactly what’s in the vaccine, it might not work, it may not be safe, and we’re probably all going to end up being forced to use it.
Merry Christmas everyone.
For direct-transfer bank details click here.
On the 5th question. A petition has been raised and already discssed by the parliament. Accepted and closed with the assurance that not only vaccine will never be mandatory but it will be illegal to discriminate on the basis of your vaccinal status. Details on the petition, including the full discusions on MP can be inspected here
The Individual Solution To Avoiding Totalitarianism
1.) You can’t change anyone but yourself.
2.) That means you can’t change society. Society may follow your lead, but you can’t guarantee that any action you take may change another. Even the most extreme regimes have learned this.
3.) This may be sad to some, but this can also be liberating, for the good news is that you need only focus on yourself and those entrusted to you (who you also can’t change, but who you can lead and be a model for).
4.) You can choose to be compliant with your own will; you can choose to be compliant with your Creator’s will; you can choose to be compliant with the most trendy, base trends of pop culture; you can choose to be compliant with the most twisted sycophants and sociopaths of media and culture; you can choose to be compliant with the most perverse laws and orders of government. That choice is 100% yours. The easy choice is to make no choice, no decision, no commitment, but unless you are as spineless as they come, if you make that easy choice, boy will you hate yourself and where you end up.
5.) Show me your friends and I’ll show you your future. You are the sum of the five people you most associate with. Who you associate with (for now) remains your choice. Choose wisely, because plenty of people are working hard day-and-night in the nexuses of power: in DC, Arlington, Langley, big cities, state capitals, Silicon Valley, and many other places around the world to deny you that most basic freedom of association.
6.) “What if there is uncomfortable pushback?” you may ask. Well, I’m sorry, that’s life and you need to choose your place in life. As Stephen Baskerville writes “He who is afraid to anger or offend is not yet a man.”
7.) The choice then is this one, and this one alone. Will you be compliant or not?
Will You Be Compliant Or Not?
Because if you will wear the face mask, then you will take the vaccine. If you will wear the face mask, you will believe the election results. If you will wear the face mask, you will accept the lockdown. If you will wear the face mask, you will let your mother die alone. If you will wear the face mask, you will let your son be buried with no funeral. If you will wear the face mask, when historians one day call it necessary and normal, you will agree. If you will wear the face mask, then 2020 will be tolerable to you, and you will learn to adapt to the worst in humanity, rather than to demand the best.
When you wear the face mask, you tell the world that you are someone who will not identify his boundaries, communicate his boundaries, or defend his boundaries. You are instead someone with flexible boundaries, waiting for the right confidence man to walk all over you.
Silly little hue-man’s… Never presume, as we are not all the same!
My hyper-sane brain, created through much suffering and hardship, thanks to hypoxic brain injury, meningitis, severe ADHD, Autism, executive function disorder and others too boring to list…Needless to say, I am registered disabled. The reason I try to wear a mask/face covering is because; when I’m out shopping I don’t want others to feel an increased sense of anxiety. My reasons for this are created through empathy and manifested in compassion. After all, I am someone who has had anxiety and depression my entire life and yes; that means throughout my childhood too. Through my twenties and thirties I suffered from ‘severe panic disorder’ and now feel that I am quite an expert in ‘the Art of dying’ and ‘the irrational fear of dying’.
So my reasons to wear a mask are purely to make others feel less anxious; do not presume that I wear one out of compliance or fear because I most certainly do not!
Every story doth have three sides, any fool can believe in conspiracy. Likewise, any fool can state, conspiracies don’t exist. What we desperately need is a transparent society, free of silly megalomaniacs whose desire for power is driven by greed. So when will, all you silly humans stop putting your faith in politicians, royalty, celebrities and the many of you, who aspire to an ‘ever increasing’ ego driven, materialistic nonsense, at the cost of our planets, ever decreasing ability to sustain us. (Maybe this is ‘nature’s conspiracy’; I believe she would have ‘G-D’s approval, given our short and destructive effect; affecting every creature and every resource upon our most rare and beautiful ‘one world’).
Our success in society should only be measured by our many previous actions of good will and pure intent and all people, being equal should be rewarded for their contribution to the virtues of humankind. The majority of you, I invite to aspire to our ways and learn how to become a part of ‘Humankind’. Unless you prefer to remain the same, as so many of you are; what I call…The Human-unkind?
Essentially, our little world according to me, should simply be…The kinder and more transparent you are…The higher in society you are placed!
So, here’s your homework task, consider and discuss the paradox that is…
This website, in which I find myself, happened in a press of a button from another website. It was this other site that demonstrated quite clearly through facts and recent hindsight’s evidence, the questionable validity of…’off-guardian.org’s’ ability to remain neutral, non-bias and transparently truthful. So for all you silly folk who think you know…Know this…’Power corrupts the few and weakness corrupts the many’ and that definitely means, all of you paranoid and gullible folk; because as I said earlier…’Every story doth have three sides, sometimes more and if you believe the media’s mediocre s ways, whatever it’s angle…Then more fool you!
Lovely love to you and one and all,
Timo of the Sinti Tribe and last of the Bohemians
Half man mild, 1/4 Daughter and a quarter Child
Artist, Poet and Anthroposophical Teacher
When you get a ‘COVID test’ do they destroy the sample?
Waits with baited breath……
According to Del Bigtree, the Pfizer Phase III trial reported 90% efficacy after evaluating the outcome of 94 patients, out of their enrolled participants. That’s 0.2%. So unless he is incorrect in his interpretation of the wording on the Pfizer site, that means that Pfizer is deliberately skewing their statistics, in order to mislead.
What possible wider environmental impacts may there be from mass vaccination with a novel mRNA vaccine.
Is potential shed from this vaccine likely to include shed of mutated antibodies primed to attack the spike proteins of SARS COVID2 and could this cause damage within the wider environment through contamination in waterways and human waste slurry etc used in field fertilization.
Could such a scenario be possible and if so what impact may it have.
If these mRNA type vaccines are designed and programmed into triggering an attack on the COVID spike Syncytin1. Has anyone any research or information on the potential of this to determine if this could still be active in the environment after it has passed through the body.
If this shed does include proteins from the mutated RNA anti Syncytin1 spike for example. Will it still be activated and could it trigger anti Syncyitin 1 attack in any pregnant mammals who may ingest it by licking their own or others fur or through grazes or cuts.
Is there any information or research done on this as a possibility. There seems to be no information regarding this that I could find.
There is well founded caution over GM crops and DNA manipulation through cross pollination with wild plants. This also includes the possible harm to insects along with concerns over the potential to render certain plant species infertile.
If an unprecedented mass vaccination program is to be rolled out where a huge amount of the population would be injected within a very short space of time. How may this play out on a wider level.from RNA/DNA vaccines.
I may be completely wide of the mark and being paranoid with my concerns. But I have not found anything to either confirm or to deny this as a possibility.
My knowledge on this is very limited but I do know that the virus itself and also immune waste is shed through bodily waste so I am unsure if this is possible from RNA/DNA active in this vaccine.
I have just managed to down vote myself instead of hitting the reply.
I had just wanted to clarify that I do not believe the COVID 19 existence and narrative. I do find it interesting and rather disturbing though that the mRNA vaccine targets Syncytin1.
Really good questions! Can you send these to your MP and chief medical officer dictating covid policy, and ask that they find out the answers on your behalf? If the answer is ‘ we don’t know ‘ they should halt the rollout of these experimental vaccines immediately until they CAN answer the questions …
Yes I will send them to my MP etc. Thank you for your feedback.
According to Pr. PERRONNE (French dissident physician and expert on emerging infectious diseases):
“The worst thing is that the first “vaccines” we are offered are not vaccines, but gene therapy products. Nucleic acids will be injected, prompting the production of parts of the virus by our own cells. We have absolutely no idea of the consequences of such injection, because this is a first in humans. What if the cells among some “vaccinees” produce too many viral elements, causing uncontrollable reactions in our body? Also, even though these first gene therapies will be done with RNA, there already are projects with DNA.
Usually, in our cells the message is sent from DNA to RNA, but the other way around is also possible under certain circumstances, especially as our human cells carry since the dawn of time the so-called “endogenous” retroviruses integrated into the DNA of our chromosomes. These “domesticated” retroviruses that inhabit us are usually harmless (unlike HIV, the AIDS retrovirus for instance), but they can produce an enzyme called the reverse transcriptase, which is capable of transcribing the other way around, from RNA to DNA. Thus an RNA foreign to our body and administered by injection could code for a DNA just as foreign to our organism, which could then be integrated into our chromosomes. There is therefore a real risk of transforming our genes permanently. By modifying the nucleic acids of our eggs or sperm, the possibility of transmitting these genetic modifications to our children also exists. Those promoting these gene therapies which are deceitfully called “vaccines” are sorcerers’ apprentices who take the French people, and all the citizens around the world in general, for guinea pigs. We do not want to become GMOs (genetically modified organisms) like transgenic tomatoes or corn. A medical official from one of these pharmaceutical companies stated a few days ago that an individual protection effect is expected, but an impact on the transmission of the virus, and therefore on the dynamics of the epidemic, should not be excessively hoped for. This is without a doubt the admission in disguise that it isn’t a vaccine.”
Can anyone explain why coerced/forced vaccination would be mandated? It does not logically follow that those who have been “inoculated” would worry about those who haven’t when the “inoculated” are now safe from the virus.
Unfortunately, their brains do not work that way. I have no doubt that they will make life very difficult for those who choose to opt out.
Off Guardian, you have got to get your facts right. “The entire trial of 44,000 people is deemed a success based on the potentially multi-variant outcome from less than 4% of those involved.” 170/44,000 = 0.4%. THat’s 0.4% of people involved in the outcomes. Because the “cases” only affect that percentage of the population. Do you understand? What is the problem? I won’t be able to link to you if you can’t get the facts right. The 95% refers to 162/170 = 95%. GET IT RIGHT. We need accurate independent journalism please.
Fair enough. But according to this bogus success logic someone could equally claim that because 99,6% didn’t get infected it made no significant difference, if they were vaccinated or not.
They didn’t evaluate the entire group of 44,000. There’s no data for them included in the results. None.
They only evaluated a tiny percentage. 170 according to this article and less according to other information sources I have seen, such as 94 patients total.
Since 99.6% didn’t get infected for the duration of the study, where’s the pandemic? Without a pandemic, why does anyone need to take a vaccine?
So hear we r again. Let the bull shit roll. How modernity has turned into the biggest Bullshit festival surpassing the First Passover circa 10000 years ago.
So facts the quadravalent flu vax barely has a 60 per cent efficacy rate. Please do not requeast i send u links. Cause the only way any individual will ever get through the compost and find real raw info is doing good old fashion research.Check out old pier r/v papers from lancet and New england Med Pub Med. All the data and figures related to Quadra valent flu vax r their. So now the oRwellian propoganda that we r getting /gas;lighting is 90percent to93 percent efficacy.
Punto Uno: the Big pharma had their standards lowered on purpose in order to have great results. Not my invention but check out ALL THE PIER r/v PAPERS THAT CAME OUT THIS YEAR IN RELATION TO Mrna SEQUENCING AND vAXXINE DISCOVERY/EFFICACY.
The ones big western pharma have just developed were and have had less tested candidates than most . If I am not mistaken some used only as many aS 1000 CANDIDATES. i COULD BE WRONG. bUT i AM SO OVER THE GASLIGHTING bullshit i HAD TO TAKE UP pot smoking to relax> looooool ONLY KIDDING BUT iM OVER THE bs>
tHE ONLY ONES THAT HAD CIRCA 100000 CANDIDATES WAS THE SLAV VAX /RUS which tested it s vax on circa 100000 and starting next month will be issuing the first batch of vax to the infirmed and elderly
Punto Due: Vaccines that take circa 10 years to develop and distribute which on average have circa only a 50 percent efficacy rate. So I am to believe now having all immunity from any liable if these new vx fall short and developed in less than one year has an efficacy rate of circa 90 percent.
Yeah rite and I made luv 2 the tooth fairy and had breakfest with Santa
By the UK government’s own admission, their 2017 flu season vaccine was 15% effective across all age ranges. And that’s one of the ones that took many years to create, not the current rush-job approach.
Yes just think of all the possible long term effects that will come from such a rushed job in creating such a vax. The simple fact that Big pharma has no liability to any future harm that might come from being injected with such a vax not once but twicw in one year. Then having to be forced to take the vax IE immunity passport . We the people will be liable and not them. We the sheeple r just going to sit back and accept such nonesense is beyond belief.
Read the criteria that these vile as holes had to go thru in order to give it any rating of efficacy. The bar and standards have been lowered hence they were bound to have reported such bullocks that the vaccine has such efficacy. One shouold read the Russian data and according to them they can only give it without certainty that the AB response might last maybe 1 to 2 years. Hence Total Bull crap just like the flu vax. Evewry year when one gets the flu vax it is for lastyears starin. Influenzas mutate yearly hence it is oxymoronic to even get the flu vax annually cause the virus is already ione step ahead but if ine has good metabolic health the virus can mutate to buggery becuaxse it will not effect u. Increase the general metabolic health fo the populace and not be mind fucked by this Goebbelesque proagaNDISTIC bullshit.
in austria an ethic commission is trying to make the vaccination necesary for every worker in close contact to humans.
Most people: If you catch Covbug you don’t get ill = you don’t need a vaccine.
A lot fewer: If you catch Covbug you get ill but you recover in a short time = you don’t need a vaccine.
A few: If you catch Covbug and die from it you were already on deaths doorstep = a vaccine wouldn’t have made much difference.
Who the hell are the vaccine for?!
HELLO, You have a major error in your piece. The first part should say 0.4%, NOT 4%. Very big difference. So that is actually very much smaller than even the current so-called infection rate. Please fix this!
( i just told the fact checkers shhh)
1. Does it work?
2. Is it safe?
3. What’s in it?
4. Who will get it?
5. Will it become mandatory?
As there is no evidence of the existence of COVID-19 or the virus allegedly causing it, SARS-CoV-2, the burning question is:
What requirement is there for a vaccine?
Those’s who get the jab ‘Virus shed’ ‘they tell you not to be around pregnant people after.
this jab will be full of lovely wonders
PCR and the other tests do not measure quantity or viability (whether live) of “the virus” or anything else. So, “shedding virus” is mythology.
They intend to senf messenger RNA into your cells and use that RNA to hijack your cellular machinery to produce viral proteins with which they intend to edeucate the recipients immune system.
Basically the idea is to modify your cells akin to the way that some crop plants have been modified to be Round-Up Ready.
They claim the new RNA won’t be copied into your DNA but at this stage they cannot prove that is true.
If it is copied into your DNA by design accident or by way of tecombination due to co infrction with another coronavirus you might be what they term as cactus.
Get the vaccine and in a year or two get a new immunological disorder or yummy plus cancer.
Just to study the workings of a typical single neuron, they launced an expensive international project about a decae ago; no results announced. To claim that anyone understands immunology to the extent of manipulating the inside of every cell in every person is the hight of depravity.
Yep, furthermore, Bill Gates is NOT a doctor and he’s full of it when he says his kids are vaccinated. So Is Mark Zuckerberg.
There have been reports of various pharma execs cashing in on shares recently. On the face of it, that seems logical (for them) because of the price hikes on the back of announcing viable vaccines.
Surely though, the prices will jump even more once the vaccines have been in circulation for a year or so and have demonstrably ‘cured’ covid.
Why cash out in such a rush? Why not wait until then and make even more money?
Answers on a postcard.
The so called vaccines are neither safe nor effective.
… is the correct answer.
If they waited a year, their shares would be worth nothing.
Assuming there is anybody still around in a year to give a shit.
Slightly offtopic, but the powers that be seem VERY keen for us all to get the flu vaccine this year. In previous years it has mostly been for the elderly and vulnerable. But there was an across the country push for it in schools this year. I got a letter from the NHS last week, telling me that I needed to get my flu vaccination from my GP surgery. Then, yesterday, my GP surgery phoned me and asked if I could come in today for my flu vaccination. Very odd, considering that, even before they started restricting access in March, there was a three week wait for a surgery appointment. Something smells very fishy about this year’s flu vaccine.
The flu shot is ineffective in the elderly and ineffective against Covid. Ugh. I’ve never had a flu shot and last had the flu in 1996 … before that? I had it in Grade 4.
If you roll your sleeve up without question you are simply a fool.
And what’s this “Merry Christmas” malarkey? Google has “December Holidays” as it’s new home page. The new normal is to get rid of those pesky Christians. The State is new Messier, didn’t you know.
Obviously new normal means now new traditions too. My husband work gave everyone day off today due to a novel Global Wellbeing Day.
Well, when you managed in less then one year to fool up , imprison and impoverish almost the whole world, it looks like a reason to set up an annual celebration at the end of such a successful year.
Especially if you are among the thin group of the “privilaged ones” who will be the only ones getting well thanks to it.
Why has no one quoted TURKEYS VOTING FOR CHRISTMAS yet
“Though it will probably never be literally mandatory, they will certainly make it much easier to function should you get the vaccine.”
To be more to the point, that should read “Though it will probably never be literally mandatory, they will certainly make it possible to live should you get the vaccine.”
I’m glad I read your last sentence twice Arby! Maybe need new glasses. I was to point out that the bastards will make life most difficult without getting jabbed by Billy’s Magic Elixir. I actually had a customer today who works for AstraZeneca. She had overheard me talking to other customers about vaccines.
Things got a bit heated, and she left before I dug my own employment grave.
Hope your week has been going well.
‘Well’ is relative these days. 😉 Hang in there!
“vaccines typically take years and years to produce” and cause harm!
“The VAERS Fraud”
I came across this Pfizer Press Release yesterday regarding the new vaccine. The next time anyone says to you that the vaccine is perfectly safe as it wouldn’t be approved otherwise, you and others might like to quote Pfizer’s own words:
I could not find Pfizers own words, which you appear to quote, in the document you link to. What paragraph is the sentence in?
As you will see above, I regret that I did misattribute the statement to Pfizer…it was in an article in the New Scientist, although I suspect Pfizer would have difficulty contradicting it. But it goes without saying that as it wasn’t them who said it, the significance is unfortunately much reduced.
Ahh. We all boob sometimes.
Apologies for my misleading information. I have mistakenly attributed the quote above to Pfizer themselves. I succeeded in confusing myself by skimming through several documents and lifting wording which I then attributed to the wrong document. I should have applied the rule of carpenters – ‘measure twice and cut once’.
The particular statement alluded to was actually taken from this comprehensive article in the New Scientist in the final section entitled ‘Could something still go wrong?’.
Doesn’t mean Pfizer didn’t actually write it!
Great info Judy thanks
I appreciate your misplaced confidence in my quote.
I don’t think I ever have misplaced confidence in you. I admire and agree with what you say…..I am not really interested in pages, paragraphs I know you can back up what you write……and trust is the most important bit
I never realized Pfizer was ( yet another )German company. How did I miss that.
Schawb, Kissinger, Mengela, Gates, de- population..I feel like I’m living in Auschwitz..
The clue was a F after a P you know ! We are not going to Auschwitz we are going to a Hostel in Green Lane
You are a cunning linguist tish.. 😉
I think i would have to be very careful how I said that
Plumelia led a feminist theatre group called ‘THE CUNNING STUNTS. She was once one of my dead little brother’s girlfriends. I saw them perform at Moles’ Club, Bath.
ha ha how woderful is that !
Thanks for that. I’ll read it later tonight and use it in my next blog post.
11/25/20 Big Pharma News
„COVID Vaccine Hesitancy Widespread, Even Among Medical ProfessionalsPublic health groups, including the World Health Organization, are making a concerted effort to reduce COVID vaccine hesitancy, as many medical professionals and minority groups remain doubtful about safety and efficacy.-“
Of those who are not stupid one should learn.
A large proportion of Germany´s pharmaceutical staff do not wish to be vaccinated against Covid-19. As I´ve been reading on their Community Portal with over 20’000 registered pharmacists there will be no compulsory vaccination for pharmaceutical technical assistants.
Among pharmaceutical technical assistants the vaccination readiness had declined in recent months. In September a survey showed that of more than 300 pharmacists and pharmaceutical staff interviewed only about half would be willing to be vaccinated. A month earlier, the figure was 54 percent.
While almost two thirds (66 percent) of the pharmacists would be vaccinated, the figure for their staff was only 39 percent. The vaccination readiness has particularly started to decline beginning August 10, 2020 with 45 per cent.
I don´t know about other countries stats, but today in a small pharmacy in a residential neighborhood
I overheard a bit of Schadenfreude and that made me think, it was spoken in jest „if the Brits want to be guinea pigs with the vaxx, they are more than welcome to jump the queue, abwarten und Tee trinken-let´s wait and drink tea.“
66%, Wow. I guess they would have put 33% if they could, but it would have been on the low side. Where do these masonic stats come from. What a crock of shit.
From a man who knows You can believe or not, up to you… If you are not sure, just wait and see. Please, read and share and think only with your head !!!
– See the picture https://ibb.co/2NZCZ6s
– Mobile 5G network is the most advanced deadly weapon. It can be chosen if someone will die from heart/brain attack and so on, in correlation with hard metals (from chemtrails, food, water) and vaccines in human body.
– There is no virus. There is a bacterium, which should be threating with Aspirin and Paracetamol. German docs did some obduction and blood clotting is a cause of deaths. Ventilators just helping people to die…
– All the so called vaccines against covid are fatal !!! Those are never seen yet, based on DNK and RNK. Who receive it, will live from 8 – 12 months !!! In first month their immune system will be very strong, they will feel very good. Their faces will be tight faces. In the vaccines is synthetic Adrenochrome. Those who receive it, should laud and persuade it to others, thievishly isn’t it ? For miserable people in power is provided VIP vaccine or it is said as it is… You can also search for optogenetics or how to hack your brain with certain light…
We as humans or they, now or never ! Good luck.
„Lucky Pfizer CEO Bourla cashes out $5.6M worth of stock—perfectly legally—as COVID-19 vaccine data lift market“
by Arlene Weintraub |
Nov 11, 2020 11:13am
„On Monday before the stock market opened, Pfizer announced that its COVID-19 mRNA vaccine had proven 90% effective so far in its ongoing late-stage trial, lifting the company’s shares nearly 8% through the course of the day.“
„The same day, in a stock sale Pfizer says was planned months ago, CEO Albert Bourla offloaded 132,508 shares—more than 60% of his total holdings—for $5.6 million.
Insider trading? Nope. Extraordinarily lucky? To be sure. And no doubt the size and timing of this sale, coupled with Bourla’s confidence over the last few months leading to Monday’s data announcement, are enough to rile up critics of executive pay packages in Big Pharma.“
Vaccine is probably inert – like the Virus. Whole point of exercise is to make it mandatory therefore strengthening the compliance aspect of the SCAM.
The Government will claim how successful it has been (no evidence required) then insist, for public safety, everybody must be take it. Those resisting will face restrictive punishments or denied access to critical services.
IT WAS THAT EASY
You could be right, Lone Wolf. First vaccine harmless to be followed by much praise from MSM – see, no need to be scared or to resist. Having again fooled the gullible people, the ‘booster’, second ‘necessary’ shot, is likely to be packed with nasties.
The best vaccines, in terms of ability to hurt or maiming the host are usually ” two – parters”. That’s why small children are good targets.
The way they’ll work this is easy.
We keep getting big numbers given to us about rises in cases and deaths but the proof is always the same – zero. Nothing.
Once the vaccines start getting plugged in the numbers will slowly shrink. After all they don’t exist in the first place. So the vaccines taken rise at exactly the same rate as the ‘reported cases’ fall. And then it will be hammered out through their media puppets as ”the great success’. Then Gates and Fauci will be ‘the men who saved the world‘ ( even though the worst case scenario said 99% were NOT at risk).
They’ll receive the Nobel Peace Prize For Bullshit and Pharmaceutical profit.
If it’s mandatory- I’ll get mine from Tencent or Alibaba if Amazon won’t deliver it. There will be cast iron certificates available.
Lol . WHEN will the choir here realise the simple fact that a ‘vaccine’ in itself doesn’t stop anyone from being infected – just that it would reduce any illness from such an infection.
See – having a vaccine or a certificate does not mean you are guaranteed not be a carrier of a pathogen. Just that YOU probably won’t get sick because of it.
Fully agree. We’ll be bombarded with propaganda about the vaccines, then those who refuse to be jabbed will face being barred from most jobs and things like sporting events and cinemas.
EVERYTHING you need to know about Pfizer’s Covid vaccine
1. Pfizer is not responsible for any resulting damage to your health.
2. Pfizer is in the business of making money.
3. That’s all you need to know.
Is the “democratic” government liable? In most countries, NO.
“To sum up – we don’t know exactly what’s in the vaccine, it might not work, it may not be safe, and we’re probably all going to end up being forced to use it.”
To sum up, the author of this article is not interested in finding out what is in the vaccine (information exists on this), on its efficacy (information exists on this), on its safety (information exists on this) but in spite of admitting ignorance on every point relevant about this vaccine, he wishes you not to take it.
Why would you ever take advice from a person that admits total ignorance on a subject?
I think some of us need to look a little more closely at the “information which exists on this”…
Perhaps you could give us a hint where to start?
It’s not as if many of us have not already spent many months looking into it, but at any rate blind acceptance of whatever “scientists say”, “government officials say” and “scholars say” most certainly isn’t something we have in common.
One needs to understand, when casting aspersions upon authors of OffG articles, that they are not addressing the general population, so they tend to take it for granted that the readership here has been paying attention – and it definitely has.
D..y come lately.
I have written a song about this called ‘SCIENTISTS SAY’ which you will find on my YouTube song channel Ariel AZ Alexander
Did you even read the article from within his article by the BMJ? It shows how efficacy is incorrect,how data is not being shown,how they are not being told what is in the vaccine. Or what tests were used on control groups…pcr or lft?
The police state of victoria in australia proudly announces its new, beaut, super efficient contact tracing (stalking) system. i noticed this suspicious sentence amongst the blurb –
“It could also go on to be used to help with tracking other infectious diseases.”
don’t like the sound of that at all.
Soon Australia will have the most perfect human population which has ever been seen on Earth:
And yet, strangely, a rapidly dwindling population…
Greetings from Melbourne, Australia W.
Things are looking grim😪. Very soon, won’t even be able to leave Australia by plane without getting jabbed.
Australians gave up their guns. How is that working out for you guys down under?
Wait for the ear tags after the vaxxes. ;-\
Australia has cured the common flu. No one has died from the flu this year. Gee the ozzies r so great. Zighiet ur great leader Andrews will beatified. I can c Pope Francis now santo dominus amen IL Sant’Andrew di Vittoria Pace e bene.
Boy cannot wait for that German parliamentary inquiry to be done with just like the swine flu one no heads but alot of egg on so called rational peoples face.
We need a Covid-19 vaccine because: “A significant proportion of people will not get the virus at all. Of those who get symptoms, 80% will be mild or moderate. Even in the very highest risk groups, the great majority if they catch this virus will not die.” – Chris Whitty
double speak at it best
I wonder if that was not an ‘arse covering’ device.
Just the purest double-speak available.
It may, coincidentally, just happen to cover his arse as well, however.
Thank you mae.
For all the sense it makes, they might as well be advertising a leprosy vaccine for chicken pox…
“get INfested” – with fear. Betta get the jab.
And we’ll all hate the NHS by the time this is ‘over’ We’ll be crying out for privatisation… f*ckers!
Free Cakes! Sign me up then.
I mean really…? If this is what it’s come to humanity is doomed for sure.
Let us jam a cotton bud up your snout that will be at best very uncomfortable, but could possibly injure you. Then if you test positive we will lock you up for a couple of weeks based on a system that is so inaccurate we may as well cracked open a fortune cookie to seal you fate.
However, on a more positive note, you will have a nice cake to eat whilst in lockdown. A French Fancy from the Mr Kipling rage perhaps…
Hmmm reminds me of…..
Mohamed Salah tests positive. Self isolates and then plays a game of football in the Champions League a week later. Killer Virus that…
Why is nobody questioning why sports personalities are playing competitive sport at the highest level with the most deadly virus the world has known.
Deadly virus disease doesn’t effect elites
Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP
Welwyn Hatfield MP and Secretary of State for Transport
From 4am on Sat 5th Dec certain performing arts professionalsTV production staff journalists and recently signed elite sports persons will also be exempt, subject to specific criteria being met – guidance will be available on http://gov.uk soon
New Business Traveller exemption: From 4am on Sat 5th Dec high-value business travellers will no longer need to self-isolate when returning to ENGLAND from a country NOT in a travel corridor, allowing more travel to support the economy and jobs. Conditions apply.
Wouldnt be surprised the first vaccine batch placebo, the next batch a recipe for zombie apocalypse.
Trust at zero. Its not a vaccine for Corona, its Corona excuse for this vaccine.
they can put things in people and it can stay dormant
and when they choose they can trigger it, they got the tek for this.
1st vaccine batch placebo no way
RE: zombie apocalypse. is already here, go shopping or in town and watch them take off their mask and latex gloves to eat a Mcdonalds or KFC then moan that others are putting there health at risk for not wearing a mask.
This is my all-time favourite:
“a group of scholars submitted written evidence to the UK Parliament that mandatory vaccinations would be defensible on a human rights basis, and that there was already legal precedent for this action in UK legislation (specifically, treating mental health patients who may be a danger to themselves)”
a) Who are these ‘scholars’? First-year students in legalese b/s?
b) Are we seriously to entertain the notion that mental health patients who may be a danger to themselves (barking mad psychotics) constitute ‘legal precedent’???
In case anybody needs reminding: The general public is not a mental health patient. Thank you for listening.
And those people detained under the MHA can only be given treatment for their mental disorder – they cannot be made to take a vaccine!
the act changed march 2020
I heard a debate today which made me scared. They are taking the vaccine to hospitals because they dont plan to roll out the vax as they say!
They are planning on giving it to patients 😱
Under ‘normal’ circumstances, I would tend to agree that..’The general public is not a mental health patient’. However…these days?
I’ll admit I was giving the general public the benefit of the doubt – for now…
The ‘authorities’, on the other hand, leave no doubt at all.
Indeed. I am being a little unkind just there. That said, I find myself dumbfounded at the scale of intransigence among the circle of people I personally know. The one thing keeps me going really is attending public meetups, shall we say. Next one will be assembling close by on Sat 5th. Hooray!
The general public may not be a mental health patient, but since the spring of this year, it most certainly has become the the recipient of ongoing mental health interventions (and not for the better!).
This is the paper put together by the ‘experts’ giving their opinion on circumstances in which mandatory vaccination could be adopted.
Is this what you were referring to?
Page does not exist…
and what about what was put into place after the WW2, the Nuremberg code, and human rights?
This new vaccine can be classed as an experimental one as first of its kind and we need to give our consent to allow any vaccines to be injected into us.
Interesting interview with Dr Budd from Imperial College on Talk Radio where he answers all of our concerns.
Or does he?
Tin Foil off… Critical Thinking hats on
NOT VERY GOOD IS IT…
Did you get the reasoning behind the need to get this vaccine… Apparently you wouldn’t be able to look someone who’s ‘lost’ a relative to COVID 19 in the face… Yes that’s it!
So let’s say your old fella who has been smoking 40 fags and drinking 9 pints a day for the last 30 years is admitted to hospital with chest pains… dies from thus far undiagnosed heart disease or lung cancer, picks up COVID19 IN THE HOSPITAL, has their death certificate rubber-stamped by an overzealous health official.
I’m supposed to take that at face value! and play Russian roulette with a shot of God knows what from God know where… Oh and those who forced it upon me are protected from me suing them should anything go wrong… Do you think I’m f*cking mad or something?
Dr Budd another name for the list. PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE ROBBING PEOPLE LIKE US OF OUR CHOICE TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION.
Could you for one minute imagine if this kind of interference and scaremongering was allowed with let’s say a women’s right to choose?
Wouldn’t stand would it… wouldn’t be woke
You don’t need to pick up the virus at the hospital, assuming it exists. To spell it out once more: there is a very high chance of the pseudo-test labelling you “positive” in any case.
Agreed! just using the hospital as an example of cross-contamination… You know just like all those examples of DNA cross-contamination the Police got had up for….
Under law that constitutes coercion. Completely against our human rights. Fuck me if that’s the best the medical profession can come up with….I’ll make an informed choice for my family when I see all the data,including long term. Seeing as that won’t happen….
Dr Budd yet another stooge from Imperial College. The same college that brought us those totally incorrect predictions. The same college that gets a huge chunk of change from Epstein’s mate Billy Gates and his hose-beast wife.
I was watching an example of BBC propaganda regarding vaccine hesitancy on the TV the other night. It featured a 20 something London based popsy who works in media based in London (wouldn’t be the BBC now would it?) and she couldn’t make up her mind as to take the vaccine or not and a medical student from…. Guess where… no prizes! Imperial College who was definitely getting the vaccine… he put her mind at rest and told her not to listen to non-experts on the Internet…
You couldn’t make this shit up! But as you can read and see people are and making good scratch out of it…. and that’s what counts
based in London
Coincidently the having a heart attack, going to hospital and catching covid, having another heart attack and dying just happened to the within days of being 80 bro of a friend….we presume he will be a covid death…not medical negligence of the hospital though who knows how it was determined he had covid…I seriously doubt a vaccine was going to stop the heart attacks and death at that age.
Unfortunately this will probably be the case as this is now the rule, not the exception
Yeah, 170 got uh…. something and of them, 162 in the placebo group and presto, from an bank of 44 000 people, half injected with placebo and the other with Dha Vack, yeah, makes it to be 90% efficient against an virus whom have an incarsirating effect in the realms of 99.9%, tell me then, witch, if you look at the numbers in this comon core days, since I stand by that 2+2=4 and that alone makes me to an WASNR, aka white ass sumpremacists nazi and racist, hehe, and thats not even an joke.
What should consern us, this article summs everything up briliantly, is the mRNA vaccine, witch they claim is even able to swim into an cell and do the home work from within, creating proteins and thereby anti-semit….. sorry anti-stuffs, huh, and then their sole reason for injecting something we have no clue about it to generate anti-stuffs, and thats it, this goes along with the Russian etc, vaccines witch is based upon the same pilosophy but different angle regading what is to kick the anti-stuff into the right gear.
Their mRNA injection have in built an potential of sever reactions and damages into it that its amazing it even alowed to be used, and now, due to eh… haste, is rushed thru and is already been sold.
The thing is, they know we know, even the evidences against most of it incl the Waksines are factual, in that sense it is solid and then we have the other side whom have simply lied us straight into our faces about something they even cant prove exist, all this to sell us some goodies called vaccines, and then we have the propaganda for this shitshow, the MSM, witch have kicked everything into warp speed and howls all day long, repeating the same lies over and over again, and in this times of free speed…. sorry speach, its amazing how much they cencure this days, and on top of it whines something about China etc media world with social credit etc, and now, just an year later, the west is gone total retard.
And then we have creatures like this HangCock, uh….. as an hobby antropolog I would find that creature of special intress, on terms like how on earth is it possible to apear as an human and yet displays an intellect belove even buggs, intresting creep, coming from the circus lead by Bozo the Clown, and whom is delutional enough to even think He have some sort of cerdibility, integrity is even less, zub-sero, and everything to protect the MIC, yeah, and in Norway they have rooled out the big cannons and shoots in every direction, and the cencure is abolute, air tight, nothing is alowed to diviate from the coming vaccine, nor an inch of the propaganda.
This is the reason for the swindle about the second wave, belive me, we will have an third one, forth, fifth, etc, and that based upon the PCR testing and some obscure Anti-body messurment, and the people, the comon man in this era of peek stupdity, will belive everything and if thats not conserning you, dont forget the MIC have no liability what so ever, and then comes the cencure, if people do get negative reactions to this so called vaccines tha will simply never be in the MSM.
They have buckled both ends, and we are squiced in the middle.
Yeah, arbeit mask frei.
22000 did not get a vaccine and only 162 caught Covid that mean 21838 didn’t catch covid. So the human immune system has an effectivess against this disease of 21838/22000 * 100 = 99.26%. The vaccinated group has a combined human immune + vaccine effectiveness of 21992/22000 * 100 = 99.96%.
This means taking the vaccine increases your protection by a very small 0.7% from already very high natural level of 99.26%……using pharmas own numbers !
The Council on Environmental Quality made recommendations based on a report called “Global Future: A Time to Act” suggested an aggressive program of population control which included sterilization, contraception and abortion.
In August, 1982, the Executive Intelligence Review published a report called “Global 2000: Blueprint for Genocide” which said that the two aforementioned Presidential reports:
Now look behind you to 1982 and walk to where we are now.
The transhumanist freaks call their movement techno-eugenics. That’s so typical. Eugenics kidded the world for years that it belonged under the umbrella of Science hoping the ‘gene’ in their description would get them in. It never did and never will. It belongs under the umbrella of Nazi-flavoured bullshit.
They tried, over the generations, to suggest that criminal behaviour, physical ugliness, low academic achievement, black skin and so on, was all due to genes .Further, anyone below the middle of the scale were useless eaters ; they had to go, as they were giving nothing but eating their ‘resources’. It was always going to hit a wall. So using the word ‘techno’ is now de riguer.
Even those who accuse Psychology of being a pseudo science can be countered by Skinner’s technology of behaviour. This way, the conditioning( as in stay in, wear masks, don’t mix, here’s your biscuit) can be seen as ‘Behavioural Science‘ . Well , that’s part of the narrative isn’t it. Skinner was a CIA asset from the 50’s on.
We’re being taught ,through the blanket bombing of data we’re being hit by daily, that Science is all. Even though we are never shown the working out; how the findings were found.
Lee Silver of Princeton Uni says that, by the end of this century :
‘Naturals’ – see that ? He can’t spell Transhuman. And he isn’t allowed to say Robot or Slave in case we react.
Richard Hayes, executive director of the Centre for Genetics and Society, elaborates:
So reading top to bottom we have the crude plans outlining how urgent it is to kill billions and to prevent those left from breeding without permission, to the more humane ‘phasing out’ of the serfs. No matter how it’s sliced it ends up in the cemetery.
The techno programmes, particularly that of the transhumanist movement, have all coincidentally marked 2030 as the deadline. So the 10 year process begins here. This is the ‘prep’ stage. The rapture is approaching, courtesy of the Nihilistic scientists that fled Germany to set up new home in the sun.
These creatures make Hitler look like a Christian missionary.
Don’t they just ? great piece once again !
Thank you tish 😉
Pretty astute, really.
Folks The technicality is old, the way of producing the immune response is cutting edge, but that is not a bad thing. With a normal vaccine you take a natural virus that is attenuated, but each virus can have slight variations like you do compared to your neighbors. This vaccine is made by genetically modifying material to match the spike of a Covid19 virus. Where it takes time to find what media will grow the viruses, and then grow the viruses over and over, adjusting the media so that it less resembles a human, which makes the virus weaker, and less likely to actually infect a real human (attenuating), and then growing a million batches of that virus so you have enough to make a vaccine (all this takes years). The Labs simply took apart a virus, decoded the gene sequence, replicated that gene sequence without the actual RNA that a live virus would have, and the reproduced that gene sequence billions of times. Add to this testing for efficacy, virulence, figuring out what would be needed in the actual vaccine, to achieve all of your goals, test studies, and then all the paper work that the FDA requires to OK the vaccine as safe to use, this took roughly 9 months (record time). And all of this would have never happened in such an efficient manner WITHOUT President Trump, handling all the business dealings that were involved.
hello, I am a french student trying to find sources in English for an essay. I think that it’s an amazing article but I wanted to know if you’ve heard of a nose spray to battle with covid19. I leave the source here https://www.cliniquemutualisteamberieu.fr/des-chercheurs-developpent-un-spray-nasal-contre-le-virus-covid-19 (for French speakers) even though I am very skeptical about vaccines even more nasal sprays I think that it’s an interesting topic to think about.
original is here:
www. birmingham. ac. uk /
“Products like these don’t replace existing measures such as mask wearing and handwashing, which will continue to be vital to preventing the spread of the virus,” adds Dr Moakes. “What this spray will do, however, is add a second layer of protection to prevent and slow virus transmission.”
You will still be expected to wear a mask, socialdistance, and receive multiple (if not ongoing) vaccines. I don’t think anyone here would get excited about a product–however benign–that left those things in place, even if it promised to offer some extra protection.
5. Will it become mandatory?
Article 6 Section 1 – Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights….UNESCO 19 October 2005
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic
medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and
informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.
The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn
by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without
disadvantage or prejudice.
So….ILLEGAL to force Medical Treatment (including testing and vaccination) to a healthy adult without their prior, free and informed consent….and ILLEGAL to impose sanctions on individuals that refuse such treatment.
So…if the Government wants to make a vaccine mandatory (to adults) it will have to make its case in the UK Supreme Court and possibly other International Human Rights Courts elsewhere…….difficult case to make for a pandemic that has a 99.9% survival rate.
I’ve been wondering about this for a while now. Taken at face value, it looks like a sliver of hope in terms of preventing them making vaccines mandatory (and yes – I know all the arguments about de facto mandatory by preventing the un-vaccinated from doing anything – I’ve been making them myself for months, but let’s leave that aside for a mo).
My question is this: To what degree can national ‘law’ supersede international law? If international law says one thing, but national law says another, which has primacy?
Bear in mind that what we call international law is essentially the distillation of various treaties, signed by different nations – not ‘Law’ as we understand it in the UK.
“…My question is this: To what degree can national ‘law’ supersede international law? If international law says one thing, but national law says another, which has primacy?…”
If our (or any other) “Democratically” elected Government decided to legalize slavery or genocide….would that be “legal”?
Governments will not make the Vaccine “mandatory” (as far as I know not even Russia and China are doing so) ….because they CAN’T defend their decision legally in court (besides being perhaps a political suicide) ….and they know it!
They will leave it to private companies to enforce it via some sort of vaccine “passport”.
I think you’re probably right.
But that would still constitute coercion, which is also illegal under international law.
Would that mean that the govt would be legally obliged to step in and prevent the private companies from doing the very thing they want the private companies to do ie force us to have the vaccine?
If the govt ignore the fact that private companies are illegally coercing us to have a medical intervention, would that not mean that they are allowing those companies to break the law and thereby be breaking international law themselves?
Interesting, rather frightening, article at Children’s Health Defense by Dr. Mercola –
“Children’s Health Defense Among Top 5 Targeted as National Health Risk”.
Why a national health risk? Speaking up about Vaccines of course.
Bah humbug – to the first Xmas greeting Kit. 😷
Not touching the British vaccine with even two barge poles and have recommended all I know not too either.
However if the Chinese (inactivated virus) or Second best Russian (human Adenovirus) is made available – then it would be reasonable for these in the high risk groups and older generation (> 50) to take the risk.
Widespread immunisation would be a folly before a long term appraisal of safety and side effects is available based on large scale recipients over 10 years. Never mind relative efficacy.
So book a ticket to St Petersburg or Shanghai and do a bit of medical tourism to countries that really care about their police as more than profit centres for the education insurance/Pharma industries.
SurKeirs about to be handed the baton to put the lid on the NHS and bury it deep.
What virus, Dun?
The one which hasn’t been isolated yet – and probably never will be … ?
download the vaccine liability form here:
Excellent, thank you. Been looking for something like this.
Problem is they won’t force you to have one, they’ll make sure you can’t access loads of places you need to go
they need a form like that, but for masks
Is this only for the USA
exemption forms are given to doctor or nurse or surgery to sign which they wont as they will not sign the liability
so search vaccine exemption forms liability they will come up
Searched as you say .can’t find any, I’d love some of those
Geoff. I edited them to a UK friendly version and printed them. The Geneva convention,Nuremberg articles,UNESCO 2005 rulings have the same standing here.
Would it be possible to obtain samples of the various vaccines and get them analyzed by trustworthy independent experts (e.g. Dr Andrew Kaufman) to determine what’s really in them?
Not likely. he spoke against the scam. he was ostracised for it and presented as a conspiracy nut by those in power who have money invested in the crap..
They’re controlling more than a narrative. They’re controlling the ongoing progress and removing laws and rights that entitle us to question or resist. Add to that the fact that they are creating new ones to do the same but putting ‘covid’ as a prefix, it’s clear this is a tyranny that have pulled off a coup.
I am not suggesting that the powers would willingly let this happen, but could it not be done surreptitiously, e.g. someone who gets to handle the stuff could pilfer a vial and see that it gets to an independent expert capable of analyzing it?
I think it’s a good idea. If i worked in one of the labs i’d have a load off. Expose the scum. I’d probably end up sharing a room with Julian Assange and sleeping in s stab vest though. But it would be worth it.
I fear the hullaballoo made over the fact that the sample was stolen would vastly overshadow anything which the sample might show.
The pilferer would be branded as a thief, and therefore any reputation for scientific expertise he might have had would be buried along with his deplorable morals…
He would sink without trace.
I still think it’s a good idea to try though 🙂
It was done previously in Kenya (in 2014) when local Catholic groups had samples of a WHO tetanus vaccine tested independently in 6 different labs. All 6 conluded that the vaccines contained a tetanus-HCG conjugate (which left the women receiving them infertile, and was actually the model for “sterility vaccines” earlier developed by the Rockefeller Foundation). Whether this kind of independent testing could be done again in the current climate is pretty debatable. I think the censure of such an action would be enough to deter any curious scientists out there.
One vaccine to kill off older people. Different vaccine for younger people to make them infertile. All vaccines to contain an ingredient to make victims obedient to the coming social controls.
That’s the way I see it.
more detail here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320641479_HCG_Found_in_WHO_Tetanus_Vaccine_in_Kenya_Raises_Concern_in_the_Developing_World
Health care personnel involved in planned administation of the PFIZER so-called “Covid-19” vaccine are being told EFFECTS ON FERTILITY ARE “UNKNOWN”. But this is NOT being told to the intended RECIPIENTS of the “jab”, who may well find they are unable to have children in 5-6 years from now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9e2PmthCLM&t=354s
The idea of imposing sterility probably arose from GMOs. Just by corrupting politicians, the major GMO businesses have succeeded in many countries in entrenching
:- proprietary sterile crop varieties – and the accompanying poisons
:- propaganda that anyone who objects is a nut.
most definitely will be under the secrecy act just like cigarettes ingredients where and our still.
it 95% effective so that the main ingredients according to them
I think all vaccines come with a list of ingredients and side effects, don’t they? It’s just that we are never presented with them.
I imagine few of us have ever checked what was in any vaccine we were given back in the old days.
In any case I’m sure we would be told that it was too complicated a matter for a layman to understand…
Meet Dr Thomas Douglas, Rhodes Scholar and one of the Oxford ‘medical ethics’ specialists pronouncing that mandatory vaccination for a disease which is harmless to the great majority of people, and which is no longer considered a pandemic in SAGE minutes, is justified.
“His work currently focuses on the ethics of predicting and influencing behaviour, especially using medical means, and especially in the context of criminal justice.”
Would that be such things as involuntary chemical castration, or maybe frontal lobotomies for people the state deems to be mentally ill?
So the treacherous UK government, by manipulation of figures has frightened the population into clamoring for a vaccine, effectively volunteering the country as a trial for an experimental vaccine large scale trial. You will burn in hell Bojo, Valance, Whitty and Hancock along with your masters.
And they seriously imagine their non-belief in good or evil, in heaven or hell, in angels or demons, will keep them safe for ever and ever.
They will never get sick.
And they will never die.
Good luck with that, boys.
Yes, they are just enjoying the current ride ,for whatever turns them on ,”probably power over others”.Most are not even Psychopaths.The Universe owes this Species absolutely nothing ,watched a Microbiology Video from UCTV, 99% of the DNA in us is of Viral,Bacterial,Fungal origins,makes sense in an Evolutionary perspective.
By all means let those who haven’t taken good care of their health. have a poor diet and generally have a compromised immune system take the vaccine, thereby further weakening their natural defences. These are generally people who are disdainful of healthy foods and supplements, and queue at their GP’s surgery when they have the slightest sniffle; for them health is never their responsibility.
The rest of us can carry on being mindful of our well-being and forego outside intervention whenever possible.
Can’t recall where I read it but I read yesterday – rather to my surprise – that people who are immuno-compromised are exempt from having the vaccine. I had foolishly thought it was targeted at such people.
Reading the smallprint on this: most people *don’t know* that they’re immunocompromised. And since the immune system is still something of a mystery (doctors can’t measure how well an individual’s immune system is working) people subject themselves to all kinds of procedures which further undermines it. Think of mitochondrial disorders, for example. Those that have them should *never* receive any of the common vaccines. But do doctors routinely test kids for those conditions before vaccinating them? The question practically answers itself.
I thought I read that immuno-compromised people were not included in vaccine trials. If true, it’s a matter of their looking for positive results, I guess. Does anyone know, have any of these companies released the age, health, etc., data on trial participants?
I know this may seem totally self defeating to some, totally insane to others but in some perverse way, lucky to a few. I count myself fortunate, in that perverse way, that I am immuno suppressed at the moment and that may exclude me from the vaccine. My loved ones think I should be fitted for a strait jacket.
I think the most important argument against this vaccine is the protection Big Pharma have won for themselves. Doesn’t matter about efficacy. That simple fact is eno ugh for me.
That may well be the origin of what I read.
You might like to see this information sheet released by Pfizer. I haven’t had time as yet to read it fully. But note the final section “Could something still go wrong?” Just to quote two observations from that section…
But we should all nevertheless be assured that they will continue to monitor the situation for two years. So that’s all right then.
The comment about vaccine trials not being long enough is an understatement in this case and it seems disingenuous to state this as a generalised fact, rather than in respect to this particular trial.
IGNORE MY ATTRIBUTION ABOVE TO PFIZER although I am confident they are thinking it!
What I quoted came from a New Scientist article about the vaccine…
Perhaps a different fate awaits those poor people…
Of interest,although I have no idea if posted on here. A document dated 26th Nov for parliament. A thorough breakdown of the covid scam,by using the data to break down the false data analysis used.
One further question I’ve not seen much asked is what are the legal implications of having a private corporation’s patented technology in your body? Would this not give them some legal rigths over you?
I received a letter yesterday from my local GP surgery telling me I was due my flu vaccine. Nothing strange in that, you say, but it said I had to make an appointment if I wanted it or I had to still contact them to tell them I didn’t want it. Is that normal? Surely I can let them know I’m not interested just by not doing anything. I’m using the latter approach, the letter went in the shredder!
Snap! I’ve had two letters, both straight in the bin.
I’ve had 2 texts, which I just ignored. I’ve never been texted or asked by them before.
What I find strange is that, apparently, there is very little flu this year but my GP is pushing the flu jab harder than ever.
There is plenty of flu this year, it just has a new name…
Obviously that must be because of the impact of last years flu jab.
It cannot be otherwise, because intravenous is the way to go.
No more pussyfooting dillydallying around: intravenous, F yeah!
As far as I know you are not under the slightest obligation either to make an appointment or to tell them anything.
Like many others, I simply threw the letter in the bin and forgot about it. As I shall do with any other communications from the NHS or the government.
Apart from the fact that the vaccine(s) are probably ineffective, and are supposed to protect me against a virus that would not harm me anyway, I have absolutely no guarantee that the vaccine(s) would not harm me (or even kill me).
The fact that the manufacturers have been given legal immunity strongly suggests that they don’t know whether the vaccine(s) will harm us or not. And they have not had anything like the years that would be needed to give some assurance of effectiveness and safety.
And since the NHS has turned its back on me this year – I have had no access to GP services or A&E had I needed them – I feel no obligation to do anything to help them.
It’s enough that a substantial amount of my taxes goes to pay for the NHS. I can’t help that, but I’m not going to make matters worse by letting them experiment on my body.
Same here, binned both. Marked the texts from GP surgery as spam so I don’t see any further ones.
You shouldn’t refuse in writing as there will be record of your refusal. Simply do nothing
There has been much world focus on the “leading role” that the UK has adopted in herding the people into their covid compounds ahead of this vaccine, that will ensure “we never go back to 2019.” Are we some sort of flagship island gene pool for the doctors of death to experiment with? I imagine that if the indigenous population start dropping like flies, we have a core replacement population already in situ to start filling vacancies and creating a ‘new society.’
Of course, that’s hysterical alarmist nonsense, isn’t it? But if you know Orwell, or you’ve seen the Matrix or read the Random Skies series, you already have the vaccine that will offer some protection against this very ominous dystopia that is now dawning. Be curious. Ask questions.
welcome to Airstrip One
Concentration camps were instituted during the Boer Wars, the guerilla warfare
of the Haganah was implemented with the help of British army officer Orde Wingate.
The UK and US have this thing where they like to visit experiments
on their unsuspecting public, civilians.
The general population is treated again and again as the enemy.
But we must take care not to mention SOP’s, because that would be aiding the enemy.
The WHO had (or has?) a “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation” (https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-abstract/6/1/166/875911) And it seems to me that in the 80s and 90s, the idea of using vaccines for birth control was quite popular (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7848209/) (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0015028216474091)
Drs Wodarg and Yeadon warn in their petition to the European Medicine Agency that “the vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta”
According to this paper “Fertility control through active immunization using placenta proteins“ (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1092119/) “Numerous studies have demonstrated that antibodies to placental proteins in a variety of species are capable of preventing or disrupting gestation” and ponders on the possibility of using “hormonal and non-hormonal placental proteins as antigens for the specific immunological inhibition of fertility”.
Reading this, Gates regarding vaccines as a mean to save the world from overpopulation is quite frankly chilling. Unless of course one remembers that the implication has been debunked and proven to be taken out of context by conspiracy theorists like myself. There is no need to even discuss this before injecting millions.