434

3 Tips for Checking Whether a Medical Study is Legit or Bullsh*t Tools to help you learn to quickly sort out whether a paper is solid or shaky.

Rosemary Frei, via her website

You’ve just watched a video of a high-profile, Covid-sceptic speaker saying that shedding of the spike protein from vaccinated people endangers those they come in close contact with. You want to find out more, so you look at one or two of the links under the video that provide source material for what the speaker said. (Great those links are there; most videos don’t have them.)

Or a friend who is a believer in the official narrative about Covid has sent you a news item with a scary headline about the Indian ‘triple-mutation new variant.’ You’re pretty sure the article is very misleading, so you want to check out the study it’s based on.

How can you find source material and — if and when you find it – try to quickly figure out whether it’s legit?

Because there’s a huge, hot complicated mess of claims and counter-claims out there. And unfortunately there’s misleading information coming from ‘experts’ on both sides of the Covid divide.

And this isn’t unique to Covid. As Scott Adams — who created the Dilbert cartoon strip and now is a pundit — points out in page 14 of his book Loserthink:

One thing I can say with complete certainty is that it is a bad idea to trust the majority of experts in any domain in which both complexity and large amounts of money are involved.”

So I’ve put together three tips to help you quickly discern whether a medical paper is meaningful or meaningless. I’ve distilled the tips from my decades of reading, writing and editing scientific and medical papers.

  • Tip One: Is key information left out or hidden?
  • Tip Two: If the source material is a study about the effect of an intervention, does the study measure serious illness or death in humans, or is it on animals or theoretical, test-tube models?
  • Tip Three: Does the study contain the information that the article or video referring to it says it contains?

*

Tip One: Is key information left out or hidden?

You’ve very likely seen the April 30, 2021, news article from the Salk Institute. It’s titled, ‘The novel coronavirus’ spike protein plays additional key role in illness.’

Its subtitle is, ‘Salk researchers and collaborators show how the protein damages cells, confirming COVID-19 as a primarily vascular disease.’

The article has been weaponized to bolster virtually every Covid-related viewpoint. For example, many news reports about it – such as this one – claim that the Salk paper provides yet more proof that Covid is deadly, and also shows that Covid exerts its action via the spike protein attacking blood vessels.

And many other pieces – such as this video – say that it demonstrates yet another way mRNA vaccines are injuring and killing millions of people.

Here’s how you can easily and quickly check whether this paper is solid.

It’s easy to find the study: here’s a hyperlink to the study in the second paragraph of the Salk article. Click the hyperlink, and you’ll see the study, which is on the Circulation Research journal’s website.

But – ugh – it looks complicated: the title is ‘SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2.’

Don’t despair. It turns out it’s easy to figure out whether the paper is full of holes or not.

Scroll down through the study.

First, you’ll see that in the study the researchers created an artificial, spike-protein-coated, viral shell (and didn’t put any RNA into the shell). Then they place a number of these viral shells into each hamster’s trachea, which is the top of the windpipe leading to the lungs.

So this is very far removed from meaningful studies involving humans. See Tip Two for more on this topic. (Note also that the study wasn’t at all related to injection of mRNA or to vaccines — so it’s a real stretch to extrapolate from it to what could happen in people who have receive an mRNA jab.)

Then scroll down more, and you’ll see this bombshell:

Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study, including statistical analyses and reagents used, are available from the corresponding author upon request.

(‘Corresponding author’ refers to the person who’s the contact for responding to queries about the study.)

Whoa! You have to write to one of the study’s authors to get key information about the study?! That’s a whopper of a red flag.

I wouldn’t send this Salk news article and accompanying study – or videos or articles making assertions about them – to others.

Not unless you want to: email the study’s corresponding author asking for the missing data/material, receive the material, analyze it and determine whether it holds water. And the very fact that one has to do all that is enough to conclude there’s something very suspicious going on.

And by the way, there are many other ways of hiding critical information. A very common one is burying the key results in supplemental tables or charts. [‘Supplemental’ is a term for information that’s not included in the main paper but instead is in a separate document or documents.]

To find a current example of this, because I know it’s extremely common, yesterday I went to the medRχiv website, scrolled down a bit and clicked on ‘View by Month.’ Then I clicked on the title of the paper at the top of the list that came up.

That paper was published May 20. It’s on how airway antibodies reappear after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. I scrolled down and saw it only shows the abstract – that is, a summary of the study. [There’s also other info under the abstract, including a ‘Funding Statement’ that says the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was among the funders of the study. That’s a big red flag.]

To look at the full paper, I scrolled back up to the top of the page and clicked ‘Download PDF’ on the right-hand side. Then I looked at the ‘Results’ section of the PDF of the paper. Sure enough [after skipping the first section of the ‘Results,’ on ‘Patient enrollment, assessment of disease severity and timeline,’ which in fact is part of the methods rather than results (sigh)], I saw that the reporting of key results is largely in figures and tables in the supplemental material. So a person would have to click on the supplementary-material hyperlink, download the material, and then search for and examine the figures and tables with the key results.

How many people have time or inclination to do that?

*

Tip Two: If the source material is a study about the effect of an intervention, does the study measure serious illness or death in humans, or is it on animals or theoretical, test-tube models?

We’re constantly being told that a particular ‘treatment,’ ‘vaccine’ or ‘public-health measure’ is saving lives. And that a ‘new variant’ or ‘viral-escape mutation’ is very deadly.

But such claims are meaningless unless they are objectively, verifiably, shown to be true.

So for starters, they’ve got to be studied in people. Not in mice or monkeys, nor in test tubes or petri dishes (AKA ‘in vitro’).

And those human studies have to focus on whether the interventions reduce serious illness and death, or whether things like the ‘new variants’ increase serious illness and death.

Serious illness and death are ‘hard outcomes’ – where the tire hits the road. These are definable, measurable/quantifiable and clinically meaningful. ‘Soft outcomes’ are things like antibody levels in the blood, and relatively minor complaints like coughing, fever, fatigue or a headache.

(One additional caveat: even if papers are on humans and study serious illness or death, they probably are skewed in some very significant ways. Virtually all medical studies conducted in at least the past three decades have been funded by an organization or company with financial and/or political interests. So studies are set up to produce results that further those interests.)

By way of examples, here are two papers that supposedly provide ‘proof’ that the Indian ‘triple-mutation’ new variant dubbed B.1.617 is highly ‘transmissible’/infectious and, by extrapolation, very dangerous and deadly.

These papers aren’t easy to find: the vast majority of pieces on the Indian ‘new variant’ don’t provide primary-source material.

The first paper was posted on the website of the online journal bioRχiv on May 3, 2021, titled, ‘Convergent evolution of SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations, L452R, E484Q and P681R, in the second wave of COVID-19 in Maharashtra, India.’

Here’s what the paper’s authors wrote about the approach they used to figure out whether the new variant is more ‘transmissible’:

For assessment of the noted mutations on binding to neutralizing antibodies, the SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD domain complexed with two selected mAbs REGN10933/ P2B-2F6 were retrieved (PDB ID: 6XDG; resolution 3.90Å and 7BWJ; resolution 2.65 Å respectively)[15][16]. Point mutations were carried out using Biovia Discovery studio visualizer 2020 and the structures of the complexes were subjected to energy minimization using macro model tool in Schrodinger 2020 using default parameters. The molecular interactions between the RBD-ACE2 interface, within the RBD and between the neutralizing mAbs-RBD[,] were analyzed using non-bonded interactions tool in Biovia Discovery studio visualizer 2020.

Translation: the study was done in artificial conditions in vitro using highly complex methods, equipment and computations.

You can’t get more removed from real life than that!

The second paper was posted on bioRχiv on May 5, 2021, titled, ‘SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.167.1 is highly pathogenic in hamsters than B.1 variant.’

The study was done with 18 hamsters. And the scientists didn’t even attempt to see whether this ‘new variant’ actually moves between hamsters faster than other forms of the novel coronavirus or any other virus, and/or sickens and kills more of them.

So these two studies tell us virtually nothing about whether the Indian ‘new variant’ is more dangerous in humans than other forms of the novel coronavirus.

*

Tip Three: Does the study contain the information that the article or video referring to it says it contains?

For illustrative purposes, I’ll use this tip to tackle the topic of ‘spike-protein shedding.’

This is the theoretical scenario in which a person receives an mRNA shot, makes copies of the spike protein in their cells, releases a sizable number of these copies into the environment, and then large quantities of the spike-protein copies enter the body of someone nearby.

One group that’s fanning flames of fear surrounding shedding is America’s Frontline Doctors. On April 26, 2021, the group released an ‘issue brief for citizens, policymakers and physicians’ on complications after Covid vaccination.

The third section of that issue brief is titled, ‘Can the unvaccinated get sick from contact with the vaccinated?’ The section is crammed with claims about damage that occurs in people after they receive the mRNA vaccines. But it has only one hyperlink to source material. That hyperlink is in the second sentence.

Here’s that whole section (I’ve added bolding for emphasis):

The vaccine produces many trillions of particles of spike proteins in the recipients. Patients who are vaccinated can shed some of these (spike protein) particles to close contacts. The particles have the ability to create inflammation and disease in these contacts.

In other words, the spike proteins are pathogenic (“disease causing”) just like the full virus. What is most worrisome is that a person’s body is being suddenly flooded with 13 trillion of these particles and the spike proteins bind more tightly than the fully intact virus. Because of the biomimicry (similarity) on the spike, shedding appears to be causing wide variety of autoimmune disease[s] (where the body attacks its own tissue) in some persons.

Worldwide cases of pericarditis, shingles, pneumonia, blood clots in the extremities and brain, Bell’s Palsy, vaginal bleeding and miscarriages have been reported in persons who are near persons who have been vaccinated. In addition, we know the spike proteins can cross the blood brain barrier, unlike traditional vaccines.

But note again that there’s just one primary-source paper for that paragraph/section; it’s hyperlinked to the word ‘shed.’ The primary-source material is a study published online on September 1, 2020 in a journal called SN Compr Clin Med (the short form for Springer Nature Comprehensive Clinical Medicine). Its title is, ‘COVID-19 and its Modes of Transmission.’

The paper is about indirect and direct modes of transmission of Covid. But it does not mention vaccines, vaccination or injection of mRNA at all. Therefore it doesn’t back up the claim by America’s Frontline Doctors that people who receive Covid mRNA vaccines shed the spike protein.

While we’re at it, let’s look at whether there’s any primary-source material that does support the ‘spike-protein shedding’ claim.

One document that’s being used by a lot of people to try to support the claim that shedding occurs after Covid vaccination is a November 2020 Pfizer document that details the protocol for Pfizer’s Covid-vaccine study.

The focus of all that attention is the first part of subsection ‘8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy,’ on pages 67 and 68 of the document. Subsection 8.3.5.1 reads as follows (bolding added by me for emphasis):

An EDP [exposure during pregnancy] occurs if:

  • A female participant [in the study] is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
  • A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
  • A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
    1. A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
    2. A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

The term ‘study intervention’ in this document refers to the Pfizer Covid vaccine.

The section is saying that someone can be ‘exposed to the study intervention during environmental exposure,’ and that that ‘environmental exposure’ is via ‘inhalation or skin contact.’

But how can people make the leap from there to saying that the Pfizer-protocol document is referring to the following theoretical sequence: people receiving the mRNA jab, spike protein being made in their bodies, the spike protein spreading into the environment and then the protein entering the bodies of people nearby (and then making them ill)? There’s no basis for that in the document.

Unfortunately, some prominent people are making that leap a lot, and misquote the Pfizer document to make it match what they’re claiming.

For example, Dr. Christiane Northrup says in a May 21, 2021, video:

If you look at the Pfizer document from the very beginning, on page 67 it actually says that ‘no male should be impregnating a woman for seven weeks, and no female should get pregnant for seven weeks,’ and they say right on there because of ‘skin contact’ or ‘sexual contact.’ So you have to ask yourself, what did they know, or do they know, that they’re not telling us?”

She must be referring to page 67 of the Pfizer protocol document, because as far as I know there’s no other document about Pfizer’s Covid vaccine that discusses pregnancy and exposure/transmission, at least not one that discusses them on page 67.

Another example of Northrup misquoting the protocol document is this May 20, 2021 interview of her, starting at 3:30.

I found the first clue to what this section of the protocol is much more likely to mean by simply looking at other parts of the Pfizer document. For example one page later, in the last paragraph of subsection ‘8.3.5.2, Exposure During Breastfeeding,’ it says (bolding added by me for emphasis):

An exposure during breastfeeding is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE [serious adverse event] associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.’

That mention of ‘exposure’ in this paragraph seems to refer to ‘a Pfizer drug’(eg, vitamins).’

So could all the sections in the Pfizer protocol relating to ‘exposure’ from the ‘study intervention’ in fact be using boiler-plate language be referring not to shedding, but instead to people coming into physical contact through the air or another mechanism with the study drug?

That seems the most likely explanation to me.

I searched online and, indeed, this does seem to be Pfizer’s boilerplate-like language.

For example, if you look at section ‘8.10. Exposure During Pregnancy’ in the 2015 Pfizer protocol for its study of dacomitinib (a drug for non-small-cell lung cancer), that section reads (bolding added by me):

For investigational products and for marketed products, an exposure during pregnancy occurs if:

1). A female becomes, or is found to be, pregnant while receiving or having been exposed (eg, because of treatment or environmental exposure) to the investigational product, or the female becomes, or is found to be pregnant after discontinuing and/or being exposed to the investigational product;

An example of environmental exposure would be a case involving direct contact with a Pfizer product in a pregnant woman (eg, a nurse reports that she is pregnant and has been exposed to chemotherapeutic products).

2). A male patient has been exposed (eg, because of treatment or environmental exposure) to the investigational product prior to or around the time of conception and/or is exposed during his partner’s pregnancy.

It has a reasonably strong resemblance to the section on exposure during pregnancy in the Pfizer vaccine protocol document. (And it’s not at all likely that a cancer drug sheds.)

So the only conclusion I can draw is the Pfizer-vaccine protocol document doesn’t provide any sort of support for the concept that people who have received Covid mRNA shots are shedding the spike protein and spreading it to others.

And the fact that America’s Frontline Doctors attempts to support its assertion that Covid mRNA vaccines cause shedding with a paper that has nothing to do with vaccination indicates that there is not any evidence this can take place.

Using very shaky ‘evidence’ to try to ‘prove’ something suggests that in fact there’s probably no proof of it at all.

I do think the vaccines are dangerous and are negatively affecting people who’ve received them; I also believe that people who’ve been in close contact with vaccine recipients can be negatively affected.

There are plenty of plausible reports of, for example, altered periods in women who have been in the vicinity of people who’ve been vaccinated. So altered periods are quite possibly related to being in close proximity with vaccinated people.

But there’s zero proof, as far as I’ve seen, that the spike proteins produced by the mRNA jabs cause those altered periods.

Maybe it’s something else in the shots that’s resulting in all the negative effects in people who’ve been in proximity to individuals who’ve had the jabs. Or maybe perhaps it’s not something in the shots, but somehow another phenomenon associated with receiving the shots.

At the moment it’s very hard to know. Chasing misinformation just makes us go down blind alleys and delays or even permanently stops us from finding the truth.

Spreading information that has extremely flimsy grounds also gives significant fodder to our opponents to paint us all as spreaders of lies. That turns many people away from listening to what any of us are saying.

It also makes people on our side support the physical and emotional separation of Covid believers/pro-vaccinators and us (which is exactly what the architects of the Covid coup want).

For example, Dr. Larry Palevsky at 41:00 in this April 27, 2021, video says people who’ve received these vaccines “should be quarantined and have a badge on their arms that say[s], ‘I’ve been vaccinated’ [i.e., like Jews were marked by yellow-star badges in WWII] … so that we know to avoid them on the street … and not go near them anywhere in society.”

The bottom line? Try to resist the pull to believe an article or video just because it fits with your Covid-sceptic view and is from someone you reflexively trust.

You can use the three tips in this article to work toward staying objective and figuring out for yourself whether there’s solid evidence behind claims made by ‘experts.’

Trust yourself. You can do it.

Rosemary Frei has an MSc in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary, was a freelance medical writer and journalist for 22 years and now is an independent investigative journalist. You can watch her June 15 interview on The Corbett Report, read her otherOff-Guardian articles follow her on Twitter and read her website here.

can you spare $1.00 a month to support independent media

Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government. So a few coins in our jar to help us keep going are always appreciated.

Our Bitcoin JTR code is: 1JR1whUa3G24wXpDyqMKpieckMGGW2u2VX

4 45 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
434 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shelby
Shelby
Jun 13, 2021 4:47 PM

This is good stuff. The trouble is, when one checks an msm source material shared from a covid cult friend, subsequently manages to call it out for stretching truth or severely twisting the data/definitions/effectiveness, they cannot be swayed.

The only part of their humanity left is empathy with those suffering from covid. If you can get through to them by highlighting such visible jab ADR examples slipping into mainstream media, personified with individual stories, not overall figures. As well as the collateral damage plight of millions, then they can be open to more dialogue. You will fail trying to connect at a rational common sensical level. It has to be base human emotions, they are still in there somewhere even when it feels like the minds of your loved ones have been “captured”.

Thanks for all your work OffG and thanks to all the posters here that share so much information I am often unaware of.

Peter
Peter
Jun 7, 2021 2:36 AM
Rose
Rose
Jun 7, 2021 1:53 AM

Here is a really basic fact that no one seems to point out

The PCR tests are useless to diagnosis Sars CoV2 per peer review

So ALL research studies that utilized PCR tests for diagnosis of Covid-19 infection (basically all of them including vaccine trials) are fatally corrupted and invalid

It is interesting that so many alternative sites go on about the tests but then hold up research using these tests as if these studies are valid

They aren’t

Additionally, all test for diagnosis of Covid-19 are non specific and developed without virus isolate

The CDC admits it has no virus isolate

All this talk about the virus escaping from a Chinese lab doesn’t address the fact that the entire foundational story is based on computer modeling and monkey RNA used for isolation research with no definitive timeline or source of origin

Covid appears very much to simply be a disease of attribution to other causes

Early autopsies of 2020 spring deaths showed bacteria infections

This really isn’t that complicated but they have us all so spun with alternative media putting out stories on medication therapies and China lab leaks, we lose track of the basic core problems with the ENTIRE story

More issues with isolation on the testing and isolation discussed HERE:

https://www.unite4truth.com/post/contaminated-covid-19-tests-millions-removed-from-market-implicated-in-india-black-fungal-outbreak

and here

https://www.unite4truth.com/post/on-virus-isolation-method-non-specific-covid-19-tests-new-drug-treatments-for-covid-19-infections

jimbojames
jimbojames
Jun 9, 2021 2:01 PM
Reply to  Rose

A lot of people have been saying things like they’ve never identified the virus or isolated it and yet that don’t square with public information (i.e. that don’t make it true but it means you can google it).

What was reported way back in january of 2020 is that China “released the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus” to the world (no pun intended).

It’s worth nothing this information is being reported in connection with questions being raised how Moderna could’ve developed a vaccine within two days of China ‘releasing the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus’????? Inquiring minds want to know.

John
John
Jun 5, 2021 10:41 PM

Victorian “outbreak” 9 people with the sniffles. Shut down suburbs, vaccination blitz LOL. Get the picture…

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 5, 2021 9:57 PM

FYI: Same hype, different day? Beijing says US reporter pushing Covid lab-leak theory also fueled debunked Iraq WMD narrative
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin took aim at Michael R. Gordon, a national security correspondent for the Wall Street Journal and one of the authors of the report that added fuel to speculation about Covid-19’s lab origin.

“Not long ago, Michael R. Gordon, an American journalist, by quoting a so-called ‘previously undisclosed US intelligence report,’ hinted [at] a far-fetched connection between the ‘three sick staff’ at the Wuhan lab and the Covid-19 outbreak,” Wang said at a briefing on Friday.

https://www.rt.com/news/525738-lab-leak-iraq-wmd-china/

NickM
NickM
Jun 7, 2021 8:21 AM
Reply to  Barovsky

Well spotted. Con-19 is a mare’s nest from the same stable as Con-911.

Ort
Ort
Jun 5, 2021 9:22 PM

Since last week’s Highwire’s segment about the alleged magnetic properties of the Megadeath Virus of Doom pseudo-vaccines is being referenced again, I’m repeating this relevant comment, with minor editing:

I watch “The Highwire” regularly, and generally appreciate Del’s perspective and hard work; I hope Del recovers from his indisposition and is back soon.

That said, FWIW I don’t feel unconditional positive regard for Del; I can’t resist admitting that it was a pleasure to watch interim host Jefferey Jaxen reporting without Del’s excessive, even incessant, interrupting, talking over, crowding, and smothering Jefferey.

More to the point, I also am strongly inclined to believe that the reports of magnetized or magnetism-sensitive vaccine sites are worth taking seriously and investigating; that is, I assume that there may well be a “there” there.

Still, I respectfully dissent from the praise for Highwire’s man-on-the-street magnetism test. Like many of the independent individual videos allegedly “proving” the phenomenon, the “experiment” was presented too much like the typical social-media stunts that are all the rage nowadays. Even calling it a “challenge” seems tawdry and cheap to me– reminiscent of the “Pepsi Challenge” or the imbecilic “ice bucket challenge”.

Even though my assumption is that there’s something to it, I was disappointed by the low-road “vox pop” approach. These casual extemporaneous demonstrations don’t withstand skeptical scrutiny; the challengers might as well have been street magicians pulling quarters out of astonished volunteers’ ears.

So far, apart from Highwire’s segment and several individual videos, I’ve also seen many familiar scamdemic and vaccination critics in the medical profession (e.g., Drs. Tenpenny and Cahill, etc.) more or less taking the phenomenon at face value and speculating on its cause. But even they seem to be relying on collective or cumulative ad hoc video evidence.

I wish that the Highwire had reported the phenomenon, but instead of “taking it to the streets” had commissioned a qualified professional to at least conduct a more organized and rigorous demonstration. A proper long-term study seems appropriate, but in the meantime a researcher could assemble a representative group of subjects vaccinated with all of the extant “vaccines” at specified points in time, and systematically test them under identical and consistent conditions.

To me, this beats the hell out of a party atmosphere with onlookers hooting “You’ve been chipped!”, and with random volunteers who may or may not be wearing sunscreen, etc. It may help to foment the buzz, but it smacks of cheesy demagoguery.

Arcabuz
Arcabuz
Jun 5, 2021 4:35 PM

Yesterday an acquaintance was vaccinated with Moderna, today we were on a terrace and he told me that the spoons stuck to his arm. We have asked the waiter for a fork and I have verified by myself at least ten times that it stuck to him, not in the other arm and I, who am not vaccinated either. True. I have told him why the “authorities” deny it and he has remained with a cow face looking at a train, I have told him not to wear the second one, that this is very strange and he has answered that he is going to wear it. My wife, with a dose on, has seen it, and I have seen her with a pissed-off face. And she asked me for the first time. I have explained a little. She has always refused to listen.

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Jun 5, 2021 6:25 PM
Reply to  Arcabuz

Spoons!? Please, take a video! A2

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 5, 2021 6:40 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Where is Uri Geller when we need him?

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 5, 2021 9:43 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Slightly off target but why is the odd response I pen undergoing a spam check?

Arcabuz
Arcabuz
Jun 6, 2021 1:20 AM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Well, there are a lot of videos out there, but I will. It is better to check it out for yourself, with one who is convinced. It is mind-blowing. I don’t know what this means, but it leaves you baffled.

CryptoKazar
CryptoKazar
Jun 5, 2021 6:45 PM
Reply to  Arcabuz

Oh Pleaaaase is that the best you can do, trying to persuade us all to tell our friends about this spoon nonsense, something they can easily test and see for themselves is not true, then they turn round and call vaccine refusers crazy, is that the idea ?

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 5, 2021 2:28 PM

This is another problem we’re up against:

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-begins-mass-extermination-program-of-americans-children-aged-12-to-17-implementing-eugenic-population-control-measures-through-covid-19-bioweapons/

Health Impact News asserting that the ‘vaccine’ is a “Bioweapon”, out to reduce the population of the world. So what will the parents of these children do if/when their children start dropping like flies? Stand by and watch it happen?

Isn’t it enough that the CDC, the WHO and Big Pharma (let alone the political classes) have every incentive to frighten us into accepting the BS they’ve been pedalling, so why resort to calling the ‘vaccine’ a Bioweapon?

There’s not a shred of evidence to back up Health Impact News’s allegation and it tars us all with the same brush!

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 5:05 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

[Isn’t it enough that the CDC, the WHO and Big Pharma (let alone the political classes) have every incentive to frighten us into accepting the BS they’ve been pedalling, so why resort to calling the ‘vaccine’ a Bioweapon?]

Agreed. When deliberately alarmist phrasing is used (as did governments as well), the messenger immediately earns my scepticism.

CryptoKazar
CryptoKazar
Jun 5, 2021 12:35 PM

Talking of not letting conformation bias blind you to the Truth and falling for controlled opposition tactics, I’m deeply skeptical of the whole blood clot narrative, I’m naturally skeptical of anything the mainstream media “fesses” up to. Personally I think the side effect of the vaccine is an exaggerated auto immune response, ie when you encounter whatever it is that gives people cold or Flu or any other condition, your immune system will overreact and possibly kill you, this was what all the papers on the RNA altering therapies were previously saying.

I think the blood clotting issue is relatively minor, which is the reason the MSM don’t mind talking about it, as long as when people start dropping dead from exaggerated autoimmune responses in upcoming cold and flu seasons, they can blame it on some new super variant of covid, they’ll be happy.
I think its one of the reasons they are so desperate to have everyone vaccinated, because otherwise there will be a very clear divide between the vaccinated getting very sick and the non vaccinated being just fine.

Bob the Hod
Bob the Hod
Jun 5, 2021 11:28 PM
Reply to  CryptoKazar

No, it’s real, and it’s much worse than they are telling us. I know of 3 who’ve died from blood clots within 2 days of the jab, one who has had a massive stroke about 5 weeks after and one wiht a blood clot in his leg 1 day after.

CryptoKazar
CryptoKazar
Jun 6, 2021 11:42 AM
Reply to  Bob the Hod

I didn’t say it wasn’t real, I’m just saying I don’t think its the main or intended side effect. I’m saying that I think the mainstream media is talking about it, to distract from the main side effect, exaggerated auto immune response, which they hope to pass of as deadly covid strain x. So people think “well it cant be the vaccine because those side effects are rashes and blood clots” I believe Blood clots from the vaccine are a sizeable issue, amongst many other side effects. just not the main one. And that we need to stay alert to that and not allow them to focus solely on the blood clot issue.

Roberto
Roberto
Jun 6, 2021 2:55 AM
Reply to  CryptoKazar

Good point. Alex Jones infowar has not covered magnets jab yet.

-CO
-CO
Jun 5, 2021 11:09 AM

Dark, Dark, Man Chris Witty confronted in the street accused of lying, but won’t answer any questions about the recovery study, he is asked whether they have isolated Covid but won’t answer and also of manipulating figures etc. The guy asking questions says ” I’ll see you in court”!
A must watch on David Icke Headlines.

Ryan Matters
Ryan Matters
Jun 5, 2021 9:12 AM

Valuable article, thank you.

jude
jude
Jun 5, 2021 6:04 AM

Tip 4: If a mainstream or liberal funded site doesn’t have a comments section, they’re reading from a playbook.
Tip 5: if they do have a comments section and it’s all agreements and praise, it’s bots. Actually, if a mainstream or liberal funded site is in existence, don’t waste your time.
Tip 6: If you got your information from a Google link in the first 20 pages, forget it.
Tip 7: If the production of the video you amassed knowledge from is expensive and slick, don’t bother.
Tip 8: If it comes from your TV set, don’t bother unless it’s the current temperature outside or a game score.
Tip 9: If the news you read or watch use the terms Race, Systemic, Existential, Sustainable, Privilege, Homophobe, Xenophobe, Climate Change, Pandemic… they’re lying or insane.

Tee ell
Tee ell
Jun 5, 2021 8:46 AM
Reply to  jude

Tips 6 and 9 are wrong (I like the gist of your comment generally though).

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 5:12 PM
Reply to  Tee ell

[Tips 6 and 9 are wrong (I like the gist of your comment generally though).]

Tip 9 is not 100% correct, but certainly a good indicator that the article may contain significant amounts of biased “information” (I support your freedom to express your view though).

George Mc
George Mc
Jun 5, 2021 9:53 AM
Reply to  jude

Excellent additions.

Tip 7 is spot on. So many of those “horrifying” vids were slickly manufactured with concerned talking heads sharing the same vocabulary and voices breaking down with stylised emotion and computer graphics and that all pervasive doleful piano music etc.

Tip 9 also good. I’d add: surge, spike, and tsunami along with such phrases as “off the scale” and “I’ve never seen anything like this before!”

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 5, 2021 1:58 PM
Reply to  George Mc

“Breaking point” one of their favorites.

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 5:13 PM
Reply to  George Mc

[Tip 9 also good. I’d add: surge, spike, and tsunami along with such phrases as “off the scale” and “I’ve never seen anything like this before!”]

And another present favourite: “unprecedented!”

Hsuan
Hsuan
Jun 5, 2021 5:56 AM

I thought Ms. Frei’s article was thought-provoking. And the number of comments bears that out, many of them thought-provokng as well – I almost always learn a few things here.

Now, my thoughts:

In the end TPTB (government, corporations, the banking industry, the media, the tech industry, Big Agra, the pharmaceutical companies, et al.) do not care about us as individuals because they don’t see us as individuals. To them, we are the lumpen proletariat. We are a giant blob commonly referred to as humanity. And this whole vaccination campaign proves it, beyond a reasonable doubt. It’s one size fits all. Do they give a thorough medical exam before administering the vax? I don’t know for sure because I haven’t had the shot and I hadn’t thought of asking those I know who got the shot. But, I’ll guess that they don’t examine people other than to possibly ask, do you have a fever, a cold, a cough? But as most of you probably know, humans, biologically at least, are much more than a set of symptoms, or lack thereof.

Most people look to these corrupt “institutions” (no longer just government or corporate entities) and the individuals that run them as god-like saviors. And so, they buy into the fraud thinking they’ll be protected and consequently hand over their freedom in exchange for what they perceive as security (paraphrasing Ben Franklin here), when they are actually being exploited.

What is to be done? We must be compassionate – and advertise this fraud widely. Just because they don’t give a damn about us, we have to show, sincerely, that we care about ourselves and other people, regardless of superficial differences which seem to have been blown out of all proportion by the media. And we do this by unmasking their fraud wherever and whenever we can.

sabelmouse
sabelmouse
Jun 6, 2021 11:49 AM
Reply to  Hsuan

thorough exam before any vax? lol!

John
John
Jun 4, 2021 10:16 PM

Absolutely nothing about this virus or the vaccine adds up. Think about that. Don’t try to rationalise the irrational.

DavidW
DavidW
Jun 4, 2021 9:33 PM

Excellent article, and apologies for the length of this post but I believe this is a very important issue.

It is probably not realistic to expect the average citizen, even intelligent and generally well informed ones, to analyze and vet lengthy and detailed scientific expositions on inherently complex issues.

I do agree with the writer’s premise that nontheless it is our obligation to either do this, or if we are unable, DO NOT simply propagate information whether we know it to be true or false (classic propaganda – maybe where the word came from) just because it fits our own narrative. Avoid the trap of confirmation bias.

Sometimes it is relatively easy. Early in the scamdemic there was a covid meme going around that the virus was DEADLY lethal as it would attack key organs – heart, kidneys, lungs, liver AND cause neurological (brain) damage.

Truly frightening. At the time I was VERY skeptical but still not sure what was going on. So I took the trouble to track down a major source of this “information” – ADVISORY BOARD. Sounds kinda like a government/research board hmm ? No, it’s a health industry mega-corp. They are invested in vaccines. So if the referenced research panned out (validly or not)  it would stand to see stocks rise significantly.

In the article :

“A separate study of 416 hospitalized Covid-19 patients in China found that 19% showed signs of heart damage, and those patients were more likely to die. According to the study, 51% of patients with heart damage died, compared with 4.5% of patients who showed no signs of cardiac injury. Doctors are trying to determine whether the damage
to patients’ heart muscles is caused by the new coronavirus, itself, or if the damage occurs as a result of other symptoms of Covid-19, such as pneumonia and inflammation, (emphasis mine)”

Yes I think it might be relevant to have some evidence of specific covid-19 causation – pneumonia and inflammation are generalized conditions that occur in many respiratory ailments.

An excerpt from another study cited in this article :

“All neurologic manifestations were reviewed and confirmed by 2 trained neurologists. Major disagreement between 2 reviewers was resolved by consultation with a third reviewer. Neurologic manifestations were categorized into 3 categories: central nervous system (CNS) manifestations (dizziness, headache, impaired consciousness, acute cerebrovascular disease, ataxia, and seizure), peripheral nervous system (PNS) manifestations (taste impairment, smell impairment, vision impairment, and nerve pain), and skeletal muscular injury manifestations. Impaired consciousness includes the change of consciousness level (somnolence, stupor, and coma) and consciousness content (confusion and delirium). To avoid cross-infection during the COVID-19 outbreak, we had to minimize patients going out for examination. Therefore, the diagnosis of nervous system manifestations mainly  depended on the subjective symptoms of patients and the examinations available…(emphases mine)”

The patients said they feel bad, so of course they must be suffering neurological damage. That seemed unscientific to me. I also wondered how the third reviewer resolved the “major disagreement” – coin flip, rock/scissors/paper ?

You may notice that most of the symptoms used for attribution of neurological impairment to covid-19 would also apply to common cold or flu most of us have suffered over the years. Yet the serious finding of organ damage and neurological disorders was based on verbal reports of the 214 patients in the study.

I am not a professional scientist but I didn’t need one for my nostrils to flare like opening parachutes and sniff…I did check with an actual scientist friend who did a spit take of her coffee in my face.

A possible ameliorative strategy is set out in Chapter 11 of Steven E. Koonin’s recently released book Unsettled about serious problems of misrepresentation of data in climate science. But his idea of establishing “RED TEAM EXCERCISES” for truly important scientific issues could have general application in a world where, sadly, we simply cannot trust representations of “The Science” by media, political entities, NGOs, and even scientists themselves. All these players have vested interests – political, organizational or financial, in conclusions regarding problems of global import.

The idea is that a Red Team of independent, preferably retired, volunteer scientists – with no direct involvement in any funded research on the topic at hand – would be tasked with objectively analyzing, questioning and pointing out any perceived defects in methodology, data, or conclusions. The “Blue Team” would be those scientists or institutions on the “pro” side of such scientific “conclusions”.

Of course, the sine qua non for this to be of any value is that the Red Team is truly independent, objective and without vested interests.

I would be interested in the writer’s view on Mr. Koonin’s proposal.

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 5:25 PM
Reply to  DavidW

Well reasoned comment. Which possibly explains the downvotes. You refrained from using terms like “evil psychopathic corporate fascists.” That often gets the votes.

[Of course, the sine qua non for this to be of any value is that the Red Team is truly independent, objective and without vested interests.]

Having observed my fellow humans over too many decades, I have some reservations about the “truly independent, objective and without vested interests” part.

It is probably not impossible, and I have observed occasional instituted bodies start out being such. Sadly, I can not at the moment think of one that stayed that way.

DavidW
DavidW
Jun 6, 2021 12:17 AM
Reply to  suddyan

Maintaining the “purity” of the Red Team(s) is the nub of it.
But given the state science seems to be devolving in – sort of a controlled religion where scientific “conclusions” are turned into divine revelation by vested interests – it is at least worth a try ? I was hoping someone from the scientific community might comment on logistics and practical issues involved in its implementation.

Nick
Nick
Jun 13, 2021 1:12 AM
Reply to  DavidW

Well made point which shows the root of bad science from the get go.

banana
banana
Jun 4, 2021 5:52 PM

Rosemary Frei was calling Cahill a shill on twatter

Tee ell
Tee ell
Jun 5, 2021 8:51 AM
Reply to  banana

Seems fair.

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 5:33 PM
Reply to  banana

[Rosemary Frei was calling Cahill a shill on twatter]

That doesn’t sound nice of her. I very much appreciate what Cahill is doing, although I do think she has also occasionally pushed at least one of her ideas harder than warranted.

Yes, I understand she maybe feels she has to inflate something somewhat to get through to some people – but that is also what governments did. If I dislike that from governments, I can not now change my principles just because I like Cahill being mostly “on my side.”

Nick
Nick
Jun 13, 2021 1:15 AM
Reply to  banana

This article leaves me wondering…Coleman had nowt good to say about frei. Its a murky cesspit alright

Claret
Claret
Jun 4, 2021 4:57 PM

‘You’ve just watched a video of a high-profile, Covid-sceptic speaker saying that shedding of the spike protein from vaccinated people endangers those they come in close contact with.’
…..
I didn’t watch the video for this very reason. I’m not going to be worried about a fckin ‘virus’ or fearful of being in contact with people whether they have been injected or not.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 6:05 PM
Reply to  Claret

And what of people who have natural and acquired immunity by infection?

Claret
Claret
Jun 4, 2021 7:13 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

Immunity by infection of what? The vast majority of people are born with a functional immune system I thought. Give the necessary medical care/help to the tiny percentage of vulnerable people who don’t? I know quite a lot of people,though I still don’t know anyone personally who has succumbed to The Virus. I’ve heard only a couple of ‘via-via’ anecdotes.

Orthus
Orthus
Jun 4, 2021 9:39 PM
Reply to  Claret

The vast majority are not borne with functional immune systems. They take time to develop and often childhood vaccines.

Rhisiart Gwilym
Rhisiart Gwilym
Jun 4, 2021 10:27 PM
Reply to  Orthus

Oh crikey! Whatever did we do before vaccines? Oh that’s right, we all died. Of course! Silly Mother Nature and her daft evolution stuff, neglecting to give us any means to survive naturally.

Sure, right now in the world lots of infants die before they’re five. Surviving that period is the best single bet they have for getting a full life-span. But remember: this is happening to the present population of the Abused and Deprived Eighty Percent of the world’s people – the ADEP – who are kept artificially in their bad condition because they – and their looted homelands – are obliged to be the source of the gross excess wealth, stolen constantly from them to supply the wealth-heaps of the gangsters-in-charge – the gics – of the imperial armed-robbery system that keeps this whole stinking shitshow in place.

In recent times, it’s suited the gics’ calculations to keep a Pampered Twenty Percent class – the PTP; us! – in their stronghold richer states, to service their need for slightly fatter cattle to run the modern iterations of their robbery rackets, as doctrine-entranced gic-servants.

This arrangement is now changing, as the world barrels into the early period of the Long Descent away from hitech industrial civ, and the gics start fortifying their control systems, changing the way they do their rackets to suit the changing circumstances. Because of this, they’ve started defenestrating a steady stream of ex-PTP bourgeois into the growing ranks of the ADEP. We being now in the time of the historic end of economic-growthforever, and thus increasingly surplus to the changed gic requirements: When times grow lean, deprive the plebs first, before any diminution of the gics’ dragon hoards can be allowed, in the slightest.

We shall be learning to live without vaccines again, soon enough. Probably no bad thing, since we do have the natural means to defend our health already on board our bodies at birth, given a ha’pporth of chance. I’ve got to going on eighty-one without ‘benefit’ of vaccines, ever.

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 5:44 PM

[…the wealth-heaps of the gangsters-in-charge – the gics – of the imperial armed-robbery system that keeps this whole stinking shitshow in place.]

Oh my. School-level rhetoric.

But it gets you your upvotes. And that is a scary thinh for me to observe.

Oh well. Let me at least commend you on how well you played to the gallery.

CyndeeJ
CyndeeJ
Jun 5, 2021 12:36 AM
Reply to  Orthus

Mother’s milk provides the natural immunity. Not the vaccines.

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 5:47 PM
Reply to  CyndeeJ

[Mother’s milk provides the natural immunity.]

Yes, indeed it does! I find that one of the most beautiful things of the immune system.

Of course it is much strengthened the closer the mother is in contact with the infant.

jkb
jkb
Jun 5, 2021 4:46 PM
Reply to  Orthus

My curiosity was sparked when I read that “immune system” was, and still is, a myth. So I searched and found the explanation of the immune system. The article said that the immune system was mainly the lymphatic system, supported by the circulation system, and muscles….. I stopped right there, for I knew what would it all be: the circulation system and muscles should all be supported by other systems and/or organs which should be supported by other system and/or organs etc etc. In the end, what’s called the “immune system” is the whole body with its systems, organs, etc. What a joke, I must say. Decades I’ve been fed with lies. If not for covid, I might not know it all. Viruses, immune system, contagion, cholesterol, salt, etc, all lies.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 10:04 PM
Reply to  Claret

Wrong! The mother passes some in the womb, then more via breast milk but most comes from acquired immunity, by catching it! A good example is Chicken Pox (Shingles in your old age), which is why vaccinating against Chicken Pox is a bad idea. I caught it as kid and have never had the Shingles vaccine (I’m almost 76) and I’ve not caught Shingles (yet). Apparently, being around kids who get the Chicken Pox when you’re an adult reinforces your immunity, another reason not to vaccinate children. And, the immune system remembers infection, the ‘memory’ is stored in your bone marrow.

The issue here, is pollution, bad diets etc impair the immune system. Nature spent millions of years evolving the immune and capitalism comes along and fucks it all up! Glyphosate (Roundup) is the perfect example.

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 5:40 PM
Reply to  Claret

[The vast majority of people are born with a functional immune system I thought.]

Yes, the majority of us are. But even amongst us lucky ones, our immune systems are not infallible pathogen-destroying “killer machines.”

If you understand something even as simple as somatic hypermutation you will know why that is the case.

[I know quite a lot of people,though I still don’t know anyone personally who has succumbed to The Virus. I’ve heard only a couple of ‘via-via’ anecdotes.]

Same for me. However, at least two ‘via-via’ people were remote family members that I have just never met. And they are dead now.

elsewhere
elsewhere
Jun 4, 2021 7:53 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

https://www.artsenvoorvrijheid.be/blog/2021/06/02/getuigenis-het-vaccin-was-volgens-de-dokter-gevaarlijk-voor-de-patient/

Translated with http://www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Testimony: the vaccine was dangerous for the patient, according to the doctor
I am an assistant to 2 persons with a muscle disease. During November 2020, 1 of these persons (risk patient) had corona. He suffered from a “little scourge” for one week and was soon back to normal. The other resident and the rest of the entire care team strangely enough tested negative. To this day it is a mystery where he got the covid as he never went outside during that period.
Six months later, they asked the family doctor to test them for antibodies. The GP was not very keen, but at my insistence this was done anyway. He told us, ‘After six months, there will hardly be any antibodies left, so get vaccinated anyway’.
The result was not unexpected for me. The maximum number of antibodies is 250 that they can measure in the blood. The patient had more than the maximum number that can be measured. The doctor’s e-mail literally says, ‘So vaccinating now would be very dangerous’.
As if by fate, he received his invitation a few days later. I phoned the vaccination centre and they confirmed the same thing. Vaccinating now is downright dangerous!
If I had not insisted on antibody testing, the patient would have taken the vaccine in full confidence with all the consequences afterwards! It is incomprehensible to me that this is concealed and that people are not first tested for antibodies before they are given a vaccination. An overreaction of the immune system can lead to autoimmune diseases that can even result in death.
I would like to take this opportunity to warn everyone. We have all completely lost faith in the vaccination campaign. We are choosing not to be vaccinated.
If people do want to be vaccinated, please have them tested for antibodies first. That is a very important point that I want to make!
 

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 10:06 PM
Reply to  elsewhere

Absolutely! I caught the bug last December and two GPs have told me getting inoculated is NOT a good idea.

John
John
Jun 4, 2021 10:15 PM
Reply to  elsewhere

Do not get vaccinated. Simple. Nothing adds up.

George Mc
George Mc
Jun 4, 2021 4:50 PM

To answer my earlier query about the odd “retreat” of the media viral propaganda, I read a review of Vernon Coleman’s Coming Apocalypse which is written by one “Kirsten” and includes this bleak prophecy:

Part Three sets out Dr Coleman’s reasoned predictions for how our lives could change in the “post crisis” future, set out in alphabetical paragraphs from Brexit to Travel. This makes for grim reading, but given how this “crisis” is unfolding, it all seems sadly believable, and we need to look ahead to how our lives are changing, perhaps for good. For example, the impact to our local high streets, the fact that many shops won’t be able to reopen, and even if they do, if social distancing measures remain in place, it will make for a demoralising and sad experience (much as it is now). Also, the coming recession/depression will decimate pension funds, savings and investments will be pretty much wiped out and taxes are going to rise (the government has already said this will have to happen). And the impact on our children is truly worrying – even though there seems to have been no good evidence that children are at risk from this virus, schools have been closed down which will impact on learning ability and earning potential, not to mention the psychological impact. And for what benefit?

So perhaps the damage has been done, the time bomb laid?

Thom
Thom
Jun 4, 2021 6:16 PM
Reply to  George Mc

Governments don’t want everyone to be vaccinated. The vaccinations are a tool of division, where the mainstream media promote vaccination while the alternative media publish the scare stories. It’s divide and rule. Apparently, half of British adults have been fully vaccinated – don’t expect that’d percentage to budge much. Remember 52:48 Brexit referendum.

DavidF
DavidF
Jun 4, 2021 6:40 PM
Reply to  Thom

They haven’t really started on the 18-30 group. It is my opinion that by the end of the Summer 80-85% of UK adults will have accepted the offer of both jabs (and some elders may well be on “boosters” by then).
That is the level of compliance us critical thinkers have to push against.
Mind you, at the last London demo, it was heartening to see more young people pushing back.
My 24 year old has decided to turn down the offer, thank goodness.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 7:53 PM
Reply to  Thom

Hah! So you’re equating Brexiteers and vax-notters? Be interesting to see if you’re correct.

Paul Vonharnish
Paul Vonharnish
Jun 4, 2021 3:33 PM

Ok… Here’s an example of a lengthy scientific study. >

The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice
Published: 16 December 2020
The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice | Nature Neuroscience

There are also 59 published studies detailed at the close of the article. Wonderful…

Question 1.) How many persons in civilian populations have the time or educational experience to sort out this level of chaff?

Question 2.) Why do civilian populations continue to produce hundreds and hundreds of Dr Frankenstein’s year after year? Isn’t one more than enough?

Question 3.) Why do we need 400+ bio-warfare labs to make us feel safe from other bio-warfare labs?

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 5:55 PM

[Question 2.) Why do civilian populations continue to produce hundreds and hundreds of Dr Frankenstein’s year after year? Isn’t one more than enough?]

It is in our genes.

A way was found to ameliorate the “hundreds of Dr Frankenstein’s” effect. In short: never give government too much power.

That lesson seems to have been largely forgotten.

Paul Vonharnish
Paul Vonharnish
Jun 5, 2021 11:13 PM
Reply to  suddyan

Hello suddyan: The tendency to produce Frankenstein-like offspring may well be in our genes. However, it’s up to the parents of such children to shape their functional behavior. The functional behavior can be modified. Genetic tendencies should be left alone…

When critical child rearing decisions are delayed or left to the remote realities of public education or government, it is much too late to “correct” the behaviors.

Civil populations need to take back control of their private lives and grow up.

Waldorf
Waldorf
Jun 4, 2021 3:28 PM

https://www.rt.com/news/525618-flu-strains-extinct-covid-lockdowns/
There – all this s^^t was worth it because maybe a couple of strains of flu have been killed off. Although some have seen their pictures on the side of a milk carton.

mikael
mikael
Jun 4, 2021 3:10 PM

This was an really good one.
Thanks and not much to add.
Apart.
Of course.

Sometimes it do happens that one forgets why one started to realise that the only way to counter whats called Officiality, liberal fetishism, etc, was to hammer back, no use of been nice all the time so why not be an assh…. more often, than perhaps circumstansial interferences in the force, probably, hehe, highly lightly, thought was rightfully necessery.
But then again, nothing invigorates reactions lik been kicked mentaly in the nutts..
No I do not regret, nope, non.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3Kvu6Kgp88

I may remind people that this isnt something new, its the norm, and just to use another term, reproducuiability, and transparency, becase its about OUR health after all, but due to corruption, its not.
You wounder why religions talks about Greed, as evil.
Greed is known for another one thing to, its universal, knows no boundarys, infact its an cancer on our humanity, if you want them to rule you, because they somehow deserve that, you will loose, we will loose.
There is no choise of democrasy if we dont have the God given right to say NO.
Thats it.

I dont either waist time on the hunt for an origin, this have been scattered around the globe for centurys, sometimes they go global sometimes they dont, and the hysterical RepubliCONs along wih the Military Ind. Complex, with their payed minions, thru an media they own, this reaks of Chines hate propaganda and nothing else, then we can start to think about whom is that have an motive, huh.
The scam is falling apart, he lies exposed, they know we know, but our problem remains, the cencure, the MSM, whom giudes the public and the senatwhores and politicians whom sucks to anything that have an taste of cash.

peace

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 6:01 PM
Reply to  mikael

[I dont either waist time on the hunt for an origin, this have been scattered around the globe for centurys…]

Erm, mikael, if viruses can now be easily created in a laboratory, I suggest you had better start “waisting” your time thinking how we humans must live with that eventuality going forward.

Howard
Howard
Jun 4, 2021 3:04 PM

Here’s a link to an article from globalresearch.ca which suggests “self-spreading vaccines” are being considered – but are not here yet.

In the meantime, I believe Ms Frei’s article says far more than she intended. What it says – and I think pretty clearly – is that this god-like human creation called “Science” is very very far from being what it’s touted to be. Science cannot and will not solve all our problems; nor will it ever satisfactorily explain cosmic phenomena. What it will do is destroy all life on this planet if left unchecked.

A Gypsy card reader has about as much chance of predicting the future as a laboratory filled with scientists.

‘Self-Spreading’ Vaccines Pose Multiple Risks to Society — Including the End of Informed Consent – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

Edwige
Edwige
Jun 4, 2021 2:51 PM

Delta variant 30-100% more transmissable says Neil Ferguson in Fraud lead.

Not one of the harder ones to call on the legit or bullsh*t front.

Shin
Shin
Jun 4, 2021 3:15 PM
Reply to  Edwige

Is Sly Stallone taking the lead?

Claret
Claret
Jun 4, 2021 5:01 PM
Reply to  Edwige

Yes I was unfortunate enough to see some ranting twohat on Question Time last night saying the same thing. Shameless, lying bastards.

Irresponsible and proud
Irresponsible and proud
Jun 4, 2021 2:29 PM

Great article. Nuance and anti-fanaticism need be reminded, especially since there is a good portion of commenters who wish harm upon thr jabbed, forgetting that the adherents to the narrative are humans too, misled and abused. Unity will get us through this. And she makes the exact point, precise and short, when she says that THIS IS AT WHAT THE COVID COUP AIMS, A TWO-SPEED SOCIETY/HYGIONOMIC APARTHEID. The other reason why I like her articles here is because she reminds us to be critical, especially with the proliferation of the targeted and eroding theory of “leaky vaccines” whose only logical conclusion is to either get jabbed yourself to protect yourself from an “escaped stronger mutant variant” or at least to become ewually hypochondriac as the covid-fearful but for the reverse reason, which again leads to Apartheid. Be critical and remember that mistrusting authority and capitalism is a virtue.

ImpObs
ImpObs
Jun 4, 2021 2:04 PM

Poor Piece IMO.

eg The “Shedding” claim. Debunking a “source” specific to the claimer, not the claim.

While we’re at it, let’s look at whether there’s any primary-source
material that does support the ‘spike-protein shedding’ claim.

which leads to a cherry picked peice with a similar example of a poor source.

But where is the actual claim examined? How wide a search did the author perform to discover…

whether there’s any primary-source material that does support the ‘spike-protein shedding’ claim

Crickets…

go watch the latest stream from “JC on a bike” youtube channel before YT take him down (he’s currently on a 2 week suspention from streaming) He’s a neuro Biologist. He covers the latest claims of shedding from one of the guys who discovered the mRNA technique Dr Byram Bridle (timestamp about 37:55 for the Dr Brindle coverage)

look in the description for links to JC’s paper (60 references) and note the papers he sites in the video as they are the latest published research in the last 2 weeks since JC et al wrote their paper.

I’m not saying it’s a slam dunk “shedding is kosher” conclusion, science isn’t black and white, but the path is laid bare and it’s a significant smoking gun IMO.

Note within 12 hours of Dr Brindle making these claims, there was a website registered in his name supposidly debunking these claims, clearly a professinal hit site was made in record time (looks like it was funded by Canadian Gov since it redirects to “scienceupfirst” )

sorry No links, I’m not playing spam filter roulette anymore nobody checks it.

draeger
draeger
Jun 4, 2021 4:33 PM
Reply to  ImpObs
Tee ell
Tee ell
Jun 5, 2021 9:03 AM
Reply to  ImpObs

Perfectly backs up Rosemary’s article.

Do you make it hard to get at key information? Yes.

When you seek out that information, does it actually say what is claimed? No.

Another red flag for me: people saying you should watch something “before YouTube take it down”. Promotes the “you have a privileged opportunity to be in the know where other people aren’t” idea, rather than proper rigourus debate.

suddyan
suddyan
Jun 5, 2021 6:06 PM
Reply to  Tee ell

[Another red flag for me: people saying you should watch something “before YouTube take it down”. ]

Not a red flag. YouTube censors. And that includes things that was against the orthodox narrative that later turned out to be correct.

Nick
Nick
Jun 13, 2021 1:54 AM
Reply to  ImpObs

Very good point and post…certainly seems at best disingenuous in places,this article.

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 4, 2021 1:51 PM

Maybe it’s something else in the shots that’s resulting in all the negative effects in people who’ve been in proximity to individuals who’ve had the jabs. Or maybe perhaps it’s not something in the shots, but somehow another phenomenon associated with receiving the shots.

At the moment it’s very hard to know.

This devaluates all what was said prior. It is like comparing apples with oranges. Because negating the “Hystheory” of protein shedding, while stating that it’s maybe something else, is backing the claim by those, who report adverse health reactions in people that were/are in close proximity with the injected ones.

Discrediting the fact that this is happening by alleging it can’t be the “vaccine” – that is not a vaccine by a long shot – is discrediting the people who report such “phenomenon”. That those who have experienced, or are experiencing this “phenomenon” would jump on anything to explain what happened/is happening to them should be a no-brainer. If nobody knows, it is moot to allege what it is not.

Only a thorough investigation will shed light on the “phenomenon”. But the naïvety of the belief that those, who are behind all this bullsh*t – killing hundreds of thousands via injections – would not have added “whatever it might be” to kill as many flies with one swatter, does not only not help, it is unable to end any “hystheory” about the reasons for the “phenomenon”.

Krishnamurti once said that the biggest problem people have, is to stick to the “what is”. What is – what is happening this very moment? Answer: “People are dying that shouldn’t be dying from a pure medical pov.” That does of course not include a metaphysical pov, which will say that everybody has their own moment of death – no matter for what reason.

The deception is wholesome. Argueing about what may, might, could, may not, might not, could not – will not stop the program. It is more helpful to focus on qui bono. What would be revealed with some enhanced interrogation of those who profit beyond imagination from this event/program?

wardropper
wardropper
Jun 4, 2021 1:38 PM

I found a variant in my cellar yesterday.
I call it “The Cellar Variant”.

Everybody in my street is terrified.

Shin
Shin
Jun 4, 2021 1:45 PM
Reply to  wardropper

Keep the bottle on its side. Apparently it ages better.

Howard
Howard
Jun 4, 2021 3:17 PM
Reply to  wardropper

I’m safe – I don’t have a cellar. It can’t sneak up on me.

Claret
Claret
Jun 4, 2021 4:48 PM
Reply to  Howard

I wouldn’t be so sure Howard. There could be a cellar variant which mutates into a fridge variant….the cellar-fridge hybrid variant….which could turn into a deadlier, more transmissible household appliance variant. ‘It’ is everywhere- we cannot hide from ‘it’.

Denys Picard
Denys Picard
Jun 4, 2021 1:35 PM

Rosemary, I am not sure where you are getting at. You are making the case that it is easy for anyone to make the difference between potentially good, bad or fraudulent scientific contribution with 3 easy steps. But deceptive science has become very good at this game. Then you use this pretext to offer somewhat of your own scientific opinion on those criticizing the “vaccines”. Yet, your presentation and argument is not very clear, but you argue that vaccines do pose risk, but not for the shedding associated the spike protein. Yet, you don,t give us your own juice. Are you going to make the case that the Covid “pandemic” is misogynist in nature and is a patriarchal invention to perpetuate violence against women…?
Scientific propositions can be bad sometimes simply because of the way they look at a problem. For example, I started follow some web sites which were hoping to create databases which would point to bad science (somewhat of scientific fact checkers). But even them had difficulty doing so except for the outright frauds.
Let me show you an example from:

Retraction Watch at https://retractionwatch.com/2018/09/17/what-really-happened-when-two-mathematicians-tried-to-publish-a-paper-on-gender-differences-the-tale-of-the-emails/

My Observations (notice, when I comment on science, I usually always post warning about my non-expert status).
Denys Picard
says:
September 24, 2018 at 2:21 pm
I am not sure if the text was retracted for political reasons (cultural war), or because it was considered weak…while the premise seems an amusement for the mathematicians…it lacks in biology knowledge to make it an interesting read…Mathematical juggling not being enough. Two important consideration should have the authors take the opportunity to revisit their subject. 1) Status: People are selective in mating individually and communally. The more primitive the organisation of the community, the more mates were chosen not by the individuals themselves, but by the community, this community approving or rejecting the associations. Further, females seek status in their mates, and so do males. Further, the occupation of women in parenting had them work in community doing very similar chores. For this reason, similar status women must have had more similarity. While similar status men could endure greater differentiation since their chores could create competitive advantages around differing physical-biological characteristics. 2) Recently, it has been determined that high immuno-resistant individuals have a tendency to mate instinctively between themselves.
Considering these 2 points could increase your chance of finding more authority in your current article.
(I am not an academic, just an interested reader)

Denys Picard
Denys Picard
Jun 4, 2021 3:21 PM
Reply to  Denys Picard

In a little reply to the down vote, if it is the author or editor. Why is this article bad…because despite the credential of the author an MSc in Microbiology, and being a canadian…The fact that we must rely on human models for much of decisions currently, is because scientists have have time to do Experiments acceptable for peer reviewed publication concerning something as sophisticated as the spike protein. Animal models may be badly structured or inadequate sometimes (like for diabetes Rat were used to study ketoacidosis, when eventually scientist observed that the mice model was better because the ketonic metabolism of mice was closer to humans than that of Rats). When animal models are well used, they can lead to great advancement. But for Covids most complex feature, scientists are now left with Clinical observation of humans which are presented in clinical observation papers.
Further, conflict of interest stands of presentation have grown to create so many loopholes in what constitute a conflict of interest, regarding either the Conflict of interest statement of a paper, or its funding is not of great help. Even papers funded exclusively by NIH (National Institute of health, USA) have demonstrated dubious back funding sources.
And again, as for most of my contributions everywhere, my article was trapped for a small while in the Spam filter (most other places it never appears, so at least the OffGuardian staff fixes problems quickly)…but this author herself appear to be spamming, because she seeds a subject where the answer can only be found on her own blog:…”What she thinks of why the vaccine(s) is or are bad”.
Thank you for your patience…

Howard
Howard
Jun 4, 2021 4:16 PM
Reply to  Denys Picard

Sorry to be such a spoilsport…but, when all the animal trials are done and all the miraculous breakthroughs are submitted to mankind…will the mice, rats, hamsters, ferrets, cats, dogs, monkeys deemed worthy of being used for our benefit, benefit in any way, shape or form from these great wondrous miracles?

(Didn’t think so.)

Rhisiart Gwilym
Rhisiart Gwilym
Jun 4, 2021 10:41 PM
Reply to  Howard

Quite apart from the fact that – as well as being monstrous abuse of these animals – the ‘animal modelling’ doctrine is close to being complete, pointless, ineffective bollocks. One of the idiot unexamined false beliefs of our time.

TFS
TFS
Jun 4, 2021 12:24 PM

My Bullshit radar goes of the wall when someone uses words like ‘Seems to suggest’, ‘Appears to give’, ‘We believe it shows’, ‘Initials findings suggest’………in relation to scientific looking literature or media mouthpieces giving their opinion on such subjects.

Such words of qualification do not sit well with science.

dr death
dr death
Jun 4, 2021 12:49 PM
Reply to  TFS

as well it should, these are the terms of ‘scientism’, lysenkoism and propaganda..

or as as you succinctly stated..

‘bullshit’…

John
John
Jun 4, 2021 12:58 PM
Reply to  TFS

The Popes of the inquisition have been replaced by the Popes of Science. In some ways Science is far worse.

Mike W Ellwood, Oxon, UK
Mike W Ellwood, Oxon, UK
Jun 5, 2021 9:26 AM
Reply to  John

There is a new Doctrine of Scientific Infallibility, aka “The Science is Settled”.

draeger
draeger
Jun 4, 2021 4:45 PM
Reply to  TFS

corporate science is basically science jargon fed through a marketing dept and into the public

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 4, 2021 12:22 PM

The attached link isn’t a medical study, but a timeline from The Age rag (Aussie equivalent of The Guardian) of the discovery of the allegedly supposed super contagious Delta variant, which is now obviously in Melbourne. Obviously.
At least according to Health Officials anyway who also reported 7 more “cases” here today.
Just wondering – is this variant related to the Bulgarian variant? And to be honest, I’m not quite sure how much more fear they can stoke? When is a daily tidal wave of fear enough? They’ve been at it like the Duracell Bunny on steroids, non stop for the last 14 months here.
When Daniel Andrews, the now missing in action Victorian Premier said several times last year that: “the covid normal will continue until every Victorian is vaccinated”, he obviously meant it.
It’s all pretty predictable and transparent.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/victoria-covid-live-updates-restrictions-ease-for-regions-melbourne-starts-second-week-of-lockdown-20210603-p57xrh.html

Shin
Shin
Jun 4, 2021 12:29 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

and still under the “emergency measures” bullshit till Dec 15th, 2021. They still have a bill to go before parliament for an extension into 2022. Scary shit!!
Whatever rights anybody had are now becoming obsolete.
I hope ya well, btw.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 4, 2021 12:53 PM
Reply to  Shin

I know. The usual suspects will dutifully line up yet again and vote for the extension. I just read a book about living in occupied Paris during WW2 and how the main character is involved in the resistance and trying to avoid the Germans. We can probably relate.
I saw this coming last October after the last lockdown, and saved a fair bit since and have ample food at home, so yeah, enough to last 4-5 months at least.

John
John
Jun 4, 2021 12:33 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Yes I’m starting to feel like that guy in “They Live” all the aliens staring at him whispering “he can see” into their watches. John Carpenter was a genius.

Shin
Shin
Jun 4, 2021 1:51 PM
Reply to  John

John Carpenter is awesome!

mgeo
mgeo
Jun 4, 2021 1:42 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Initially, the “free world” could pin disieases, bad culture, even natural disasters on the Third World or their enemies. Now that the shoe is on the other foot (some countries are tracing variants to them), they have moved the goalposts again, renaming the variants using Greek letters.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 4, 2021 1:57 PM
Reply to  mgeo

And they’ll keep moving the goalposts and keep locking down and keep coming up variants and all sorts of absolute bollocks… until a very sizable majority are vaccinated.

Shin
Shin
Jun 4, 2021 2:11 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Over the last ten months,I’ve spent over 40 days in hospital. Old man issues.
Not once have i had a PCR test, nor have i been asked to have one, or needed to provide clarification of who I’ve meet or been with.
Over the road (testing station) people line up like zombies in a possession of endlessness.
A mind set of “this is my future and i don’t know why”
It’s a conundrum that’s been here forever.

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 4, 2021 2:00 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

This link is only to emphasize the extend of the deception. Whether this is an Iranian news outlet, or not is not possible to figure. Any news outlet that quotes “bellingcat”, “the syrian observatory for human rights” and other known msm fake news must be in the fold of the deceivers. Sad, as it clarifies that no news can be trusted any longer. Leaving only ones eyes and ears – seeing and hearing what is happening surrounding these senses. The why remains elusive.

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/06/04/658233/Australia-COVID-variant-Melbourne-Delta-

Ironically, we knew this would happen before it happens. Critical thinking is akin to premonition.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 4, 2021 2:32 PM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

Yep, it’s an Iranian news site. I only skim read the first few paragraphs. Same same everywhere. It’s like there’s a headquarters somewhere disseminating the same scripts for all media. I’ve read the theory that all Govts across the world are in on the scamdemic, but one thing is for certain, I don’t believe any MSM anywhere now.
I actually have an outspoken Iranian friend on FB, tho he keeps getting banned by them. I went to ask him his opinion just then… but he’s suspended again. I only trust about 6 alternative sites now, including this one.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 2:41 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

It’s justa reprint. All thinking has ceased.

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 4, 2021 2:49 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

The German site “KenFM” is now under STASI surveillance. Stasi, because that’s what Gelen’s “Verfassungsschutz” (“Constitutionprotection”/”NSA”) has always been. I just wish more articles would be available in other languages, because the people writing for the site, or being interviewed are stellar.

Here is the “international” segment with selected articles translated into English:

https://kenfm.de/kenfm-international/

Another site is “Rubikon”. Excellent analysis and opinion pieces – also only in German, if not translated by somebody. All content is free to re-distribute, absent any changes in content or license.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 5, 2021 10:21 AM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

I missed this comment… Appreciate those links Not, cheers. My smartphone (I know, sigh) actually translates foreign languages, well at least it can translate French into English, so obviously it’ll do German as well. I’ll have a read of these articles after dinner, then catch up on a few videos.
Regards your Press TV comment below on food security, like I said to someone else, it’s like there’s one headquarters somewhere churning out all the press releases and doom laden scamdemic mongering and distributes them to all these media organisations from all over the world. Including in Iran.

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 5, 2021 12:14 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

This is exactly hat it looks like, Gezzah. Which brings me to ask the only remaining question:

How do we get the Pyongyang News? Wouldn’t it be interesting to see what they are publishing? Seems they are the only true outsider on the planet. Thanks to their nukes, I guess.

However, considering the “media”, we indeed already have a global regime.

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 5, 2021 12:25 PM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

Ha, ha, ha, I found it and their reporting is very thorough:

http://www.pyongyangtimes.com.kp/?bbs=38323

A real gem. No wonder there is such a drive for “artificial” intelligence. “Intelligence” here not being the critical thinking abilities of a human being – but the bullshitting of the unintelligence agencies.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 5, 2021 12:45 PM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

https://kcnawatch.org/newstream/
https://kcnawatch.org/
Ohhh… You beat me to it! It took me a while to find anything on covid, but I found a whole series of photos of ordinary people… and they’re all masked😲 Even North Korea as well!?
It’s fecken everywhere. Bloody hell.
Maybe there’s somewhere in deepest Patagonia they haven’t heard of it…

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 5, 2021 1:50 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

You need to watch the videos for some entertainment. I highly recommend the “Bag factory” and “Land of the People”.
“Land of the People” would have had Erich Honecker’s eyes in tears of joy.
And people are called “conspiracy nuts” when they realize how everything is just one huge fake centralized controlled reality.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 5, 2021 2:28 PM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

Okay, I’ll check them out tomorrow Not. I was going to look at more videos on the scamdemic, but got distracted with other stuff…. tho I pretty much know everything about the greatest crime ever perpetrated on humanity.
Very late down here, so time to crash. Have a good weekend my friend…

jkb
jkb
Jun 5, 2021 5:35 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

I read months ago that a person not wearing mask was shot to death. Then I remembered that China had influence on NK and China was the starter of this covid operation.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 5, 2021 1:31 PM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

It’s just a ‘reprint’. More waste of space.

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 5, 2021 1:51 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

What’s even worse is the waste of energy. One effing outlet would suffice to publish all this propaganda.

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 4, 2021 2:55 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

I’d like to add that PressTV keeps reporting about “food security” or the lack thereof. Are they not already the pariah of the world? Like North Korea? If so, why are they not promoting the massive permaculture of Hemp and Cannabis? Hemp seeds are one of the most valuable sources of plant protein and important fatty chains. But no – Iran goes the way of “industrial agriculture” reporting with pride about their mono cultures.

It really is just one gigantic bullshittery.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 2:40 PM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

Delta Variant? What bollocks! India has a fatality rate lower than the UK’s! Using total numbers is more gaslighting (India, population 1.4 bilion).

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 4, 2021 2:58 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

This is what pisses me off. Iran is supposedly the pariah of the world – but is totally in line with all other bs msm oulets the world over? Disgusting this deception. Everything a pathetic ham theater.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 5, 2021 1:47 PM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

The question of WHY virtually every country has ‘fallen into line’ behind the Empire is not easy to explain, if you ignore the power of the Empire to twist arms, isolate, punish, bribe and blackmail any country that doesn’t tow the line, even so-called developed countries like Sweden. Kinder words would explain it as ‘peer pressure’, but which ruling class of country A wants to be a pariah?

Then there’s the issue of the economic pressure exerted by virtue of the lockdown and shutdown of trade, after all global trade is controlled by the Empire. Countries like the UK can actually afford to shut down their economies (except for ‘essentials) and it’s been calculated that the British economy can sail on using only 20% of its workforce!

What’s NOT addressed by the corporate/state media is the devastating impact of this global shutdown on what we call the Global South and it’s not the Bug, it’s starvation and every other kind of disease that’s no longer being treated, where the REAL crimes of the Empire are revealed, India being a case in point. Shutdowns are only for the RICH NATIONS, the nations that can actually afford to indulge in such luxuries (WWII comes to mind).

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 5, 2021 4:54 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

My Mom keeps asking me how it all came to this. To which I have only one meaningful answer:

Consumerism.

Everything was more important than to prepare for times like this one. Soccer was always more important than growing food. Now it’s “No bread – just games”. Considering how dire the situation here in UY/LA is, when a soccer game is on, nothing else matters.

Soccer, football, rugby, tennis, basketball, NASCAR, boxing, Formula 1, moto GP – all games more important than paying attention to what is in the making politically. Since a very long time.

Combined with planned obsolescence consumerism – leaves no room time to focus on the true essentials. You could also call it “dumbed down to bricks”.

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
Jun 6, 2021 1:26 PM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

“So long as they (the Proles) continued to work and breed, their other activities were without importance. Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern…Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbors, films, football, beer and above all, gambling filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult.
― George Orwell, 1984

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 6, 2021 4:56 PM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

Wow. To be honest, although I read “1984” a long time ago and was deeply moved by its dystopia, I have forgotten this exceptionally apt description by Orwell. Did he ever travel to South America? What insight into the deepest machinations of a people that completely lost the meaning of life. It is really depressing in an already depressing time.

For a long time, I have been wondering about what a writer like Orwell would write today about what is coming to humanity next.

Paul
Paul
Jun 5, 2021 12:49 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

I remember you called this manufactured wave months ago.

It seems Victoria has been selected as the state in Victoria to launch the new abnormal.

They could never persuade the people to take the jab if ‘covid’ never reappeared.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 5, 2021 6:15 AM
Reply to  Paul

Apparently there was “vaccine hesitancy” here, and this latest conjuring trick in Victoria is undoubtedly to have way more people getting the jab.
Majority of my customers are your liberal The Guardian reading Labour voting self believing “progressives”… But only until push comes to shove. In name only. The number of them that fully support vaccine passports is just one example.
I’d say at a perceived guess, minimum 80% of my customers had either had the jab or were planning to get it. In fact, I’ve only had one single customer who knew its a scamdemic and total bollocks and who wasn’t getting vaccinated for that very reason, although she was a random customer and not a regular.
More cases here today from this “contagious” Delta variant of course.
Its like these demons pushing this crap were all deliberately put in place a few years (or less) prior to the plandemic. Oh my, is that a conspiracy theory? What am I thinking? Don’t see this current lockdown ending soon.

Donald Duck
Donald Duck
Jun 4, 2021 12:02 PM

One of the more serious side-effects of the fake epidemic is the probable disappearance of the publicly funded National Health Services. By now we should know that the NHS was the finest achievement of the Labour Government in the UK in 1945. But it seems unlikely that the publicly funded health services (particularly in Europe) will survive in their present form. People with serious illnesses are now treated as nuisances and their numbers are piling up. But Covid ‘patients’ i.e., those healthy persons acting as human guinea pigs are given priority. Big Pharma, Big Government, Big Media are all behind this. The drive is to let the really sick people die so that resources can be transferred to the happy-jabby normies.

Such normal health services that do exist will be based upon the American model. No money – no treatment. I wonder if our jabby-fans realise this? But I suspect that our silly normies haven’t yet sussed this out? It seems doubtful. Moreover, the economic consequences of recurrent lockdowns and the resulting massive structural unemployment has begun to register of their collective consciences? Population adjustment downwards?

Yes, life is going to be really great after all the Anti-vaxxers are gone. No jobs, no (real)
food, no forever poisoning with the magic jab, no medical attention. No life worth living – the PTB will see to that.

Unfortunately , it seems that people who walk like sheep into the abattoir are frankly too stupid to survive. The PTB know this and so the programme rolls on.

George Mc
George Mc
Jun 4, 2021 12:43 PM
Reply to  Donald Duck

I think you are right about the NHS which, as with so much else, is now the target of a manoeuvre which would have been unthinkable without the fake virus. With that, it joins the overall attack on the public purse. Recall that when the banks made off with vast oceans of cash in 2008, there was an immense upsurge of rage about it. And the PTB knew there was no way they could have gotten away with that a second time. And a few months back, the WEF said that the pandemic had already cost four times as much as that 2008 crash. But – lo and behold! Not a peep of protest over that! Well we were in the heart of this dreadful plague etc.

It’s deeply sobering to think of how the Left has for decades been rattling sabres out of defending the various these fundamental services to the death! We will never give up! And so on. But bring in the deadly plague and suddenly it all goes out the window.

And, as I’ve said so many times before, there was no other way you could have done this – no other way you could have had such a blatant attack on public services and not only get away with it but even have the “dissident” sector cheer you on and demand you go further!

Thus, the calls from the “Right-on Left”: “We must have more lockdowns! More facilities given over to the fight against covid! More people confined to their houses! Increased social distancing! Keep the people apart! Spend more and more money on vaccines and masks!”

rubberheid
rubberheid
Jun 4, 2021 7:46 PM
Reply to  George Mc

Geo, shut up about the left, c’mon dude. Shaddup, you are pretty bang on with your patter but shaddup with all that left/right tosh. Puleease. otherwise, carry on bro ; )

George Mc
George Mc
Jun 4, 2021 7:58 PM
Reply to  rubberheid

Quite correct. Nobody cares!

rubberheid
rubberheid
Jun 4, 2021 8:19 PM
Reply to  George Mc

I always thought I was a socialist, in the sense that society HAS to afford the weak, ill, young and aged etc some assurance of care; some social responsibility to care. now??

mgeo
mgeo
Jun 4, 2021 1:46 PM
Reply to  Donald Duck

After WW2, socialism and communism provided the incentive (or challenge) that led to many social benefits across Europe and elsewhere. Now, GloboCap strikes back.

Irresponsible and proud
Irresponsible and proud
Jun 4, 2021 2:43 PM
Reply to  Donald Duck

…and to further give credence to your accurate point, here is what zeke emmanuel, central figure on the affordable health care act of the u.s.,thinks about euthanasia and “efficient allocation of medical resources”. Keep in mind please, as you listen, that the intetview is from 2019 and he says that he considers a pandemic occurance a certain event of the future. I am clarifying that I am not, have been not, a fan of Trump or the republican party and neither of the democrats. Class war can not be resolved through parliamentary politics.
https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/talks-at-gs/dr-zeke-emanuel.html

Mike W Ellwood, Oxon, UK
Mike W Ellwood, Oxon, UK
Jun 5, 2021 9:31 AM
Reply to  Donald Duck

Yes, life is going to be really great after all the Anti-vaxxers are gone. No jobs, no (real)

food, no forever poisoning with the magic jab, no medical attention. No life worth living – the PTB will see to that.

And probably no cars either.

George Mc
George Mc
Jun 4, 2021 11:55 AM

When you realise that our media system (in league with the customary consumer capitalist strategy of undermining individual self-worth to create “good consumers”) has always had the primary aim of constantly destabilizing (and thus neutering and coercing) the population, then you also realise that every thing you are told on the media should be taken not so much with a pinch of salt as with a vat of acid. David Icke tends to have a sledgehammer approach but nevertheless, he is essentially correct when he put it simply: “It’s all bollocks!”

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
Jun 4, 2021 11:55 AM

I waded through part of the article but didn’t get anything useful out of it. Does Miss Frei believe convid is a real virus that emerged suddenly from bats or from a lab ? Does she believe it is deadly ? She says at one point she thinks the “vaccine” may be harmful. But doesn’t mention the huge death toll and the ocean of adverse events including serious ones.

Each new article from this author comes with ammunition against one or more opponents of the convid narrative. Is this appropriate at a time like this or a situation like this ? We are in the midst of a David vs Goliath propaganda struggle between the global media with it’s unlimited resources, the governments, big business and so much more on the one hand , and a handful of courageous individuals on the other. An unequal struggle like no other and the dissidents face history’s most aggressive censorship regime. To hand out equal amounts of ammunition to each side at this time is hardly fair. The establishment’s propaganda blitz is relentless and overpowering. What is most important is that it based on obvious falsehood. And this makes this situation sinister in the extreme. How can the speculation of a few individuals, the output of slingshots compare with the deafening artillery barrage mankind now faces ?

Even simple products encounter serious problems in the field. Most airliners have killed a lot of people before the problems were sorted out despite advanced analysis at the design stage. The injections are based on untested principles and have already shown themselves to be deadly even with massive under reporting. For God’s sake let people speculate on what might happen and how it might happen. The possibilities in the long term are horrifying. And the idea that the establishment would respect the most considered and qualified contrary opinions is absurd.

Alan Watts
Alan Watts
Jun 4, 2021 12:11 PM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

“nothing is true, everything is permitted”

Tom Larsen
Tom Larsen
Jun 4, 2021 2:20 PM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

I agree. I disagree with Frei’s admonishment at the end of her piece. We don’t need solidarity with the brainwashed coronazombies. We need solidarity amongst ourselves.

Tom Welsh
Tom Welsh
Jun 4, 2021 11:39 AM

“The paper is about indirect and direct modes of transmission of Covid. But it does not mention vaccines, vaccination or injection of mRNA at all. Therefore it doesn’t back up the claim by America’s Frontline Doctors that people who receive Covid mRNA vaccines shed the spike protein”.

Granted that there is no formal research cited to support that claim. But can’t some assumptions be made by common sense, until the research is done? (Which, sadly, will probably never be done in this case, for obvious reasons).

If a person has Covid-19, we are told that he is likely to “shed” viral particles profusely, so that it is dangerous even to be in the same room. Can’t we reasonably assume that if a “vaccine” causes a person to create huge numbers of spike protein particles – which circulate throughout the bloostream – a fair number of those will be exhaled just as viral particles are?

Norwegian Bob
Norwegian Bob
Jun 4, 2021 3:56 PM
Reply to  Tom Welsh

Not just through breath but also through sweat vapour and glands. It really needs scientific proper study.

Tee ell
Tee ell
Jun 5, 2021 9:12 AM
Reply to  Tom Welsh

Only if you maintain a very strong awareness that you’re on the far left of Dunning Kruger.

What you’ve suggested is pure speculation, not “common sense”.

Can we reasonably speculate, hypothesize and discuss? Yes. Can we “reasonably assume”? Absolutely not.

Shin
Shin
Jun 4, 2021 11:36 AM

Delta strain found in Australia. Sounds cool, like special ops or something.
Yes, Australia can get more corrupt. They don’t even attempt to hide it.
A badge of honer type decree, against logic.
The dilutes bang their noggins againts brick walls, hoping government will save them.
A badge of honor type crap.
I doubt the start point hasn’t even arrived.
Absolute whore mongering scum.
Every single last one of them!

Edwige
Edwige
Jun 4, 2021 11:57 AM
Reply to  Shin

Perhaps they’re big Lee Marvin fans?

Shin
Shin
Jun 4, 2021 12:04 PM
Reply to  Edwige

Maybe, more John Wayne i reckon. At least Marvin was in a Sergio Leone flick.

George Mc
George Mc
Jun 4, 2021 1:29 PM
Reply to  Shin

And he sang the most philosophically astute line ever:

“I never seen a sight that didn’t look better looking back”

Waldorf
Waldorf
Jun 4, 2021 2:24 PM
Reply to  Edwige

“If they hadn’t done what I told them not to do, they’d still be alive.” (Mr Blonde, dissecting moral dilemmas)

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 4, 2021 12:33 PM
Reply to  Shin

I’m waiting for the Bulgarian variant to arrive… or maybe the Maltese variant.
Buckle up Shin, this lockdown is going to go on for quite a while yet. The goal: to get the large majority vaccinated so then they can bring in vaccine passports.
They’ll pretend to um and ah about this, but believe me, they’re coming.
It’s straight out psychological warfare.
Been to 6 shops yesterday and today, and no one asked me to scan the QR code, and no one asked me to put a mask on.
Not a word in any of them. Am avoiding Coles and Woolies and going to smaller family owned businesses instead. Hope things are well with you…

Shin
Shin
Jun 4, 2021 12:55 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

It’ll probably be a combination Gezzah. Maybe a Fijian tropically strained Elixir mixed with the deadly Tasmanian chilled “cascade” variant.

Mike W Ellwood, Oxon, UK
Mike W Ellwood, Oxon, UK
Jun 5, 2021 9:37 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

The Maltese Mutant?

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 5, 2021 10:05 AM

Yep, from Gozo apparently. Or maybe I’m mixing up Malta with Mali? It’s all a bit confusing at present🤷‍♂️

Victor G.
Victor G.
Jun 4, 2021 1:32 PM
Reply to  Shin

Warning: the Perth Amboy strain detected in northern New Jersey … seems to be a cross between the Flatbush variant and the Upper East Side sub-variant.
Pleased to report however that the Bronx has been exonerated and remains more or less within the traditional viral framework.
(Just read that the NYT considers satire “misinformation”. OGers please forgive me my satire. I will surely forgive you yours.)

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 4, 2021 2:27 PM
Reply to  Shin

That sounds so familiar. Where have I witnessed that before? Oh, yes, I remember now! When there were millions of voices (backed by studies about the adverse effects of micro wave radiation) demanding further research into “5G”, the Uruguayan people celebrated the swift installation of “5G” everywhere. “¡Ahora con 5G!” on the front doors of hotels and supermarkets. Demanding “vaccine passports”, driving in their cars double masked and faceshielded.

Must be the same DNA.

Yesterday I went to the butcher/corner store close by shortly before closing time and they were all watching “Uruguay vesus Paraguay” (soccer is the most important thing in life) with their masks all pulled down. At the door, I smile and say “Now we’re talking!” (because I call the face diaper “tapa loca” and speak up against it wherever possible) and they all put them back on synchroneously like swimmers doing their routine.

Thanks to Kevin who posted the link with Dr. Fuellmich having the international heads-up by laywers from South America, I was able to listen to the law professor from Uruguay, who just laughed at the question whether Uruguay is still a democracy. It never was. He called it a Cleptocorporacy. (at ~ 3:00:00).

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
Jun 4, 2021 10:18 AM

We are in the last days of our civilization, says Irish writer John Waters, speaking on the Richie Allen show. We are steps away from yellow stars and the unvaxxed being lynched in the streets — for a pandemic that exists largely in the fascist media.

We have been broken like horses… millions have got use to the bridle. One trained to accept it, the horse can never be unbroken.

From 58 minutes.

Corarden
Corarden
Jun 4, 2021 10:50 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

Cheery news. Something to look forward to then.
Meanwhile, Banners galore seems to indicate that the ‘aliens’ story is ramping up, right on time.

Who could be dumb enough to believe such a story? It’s as dumb as thinking that being vaccinated forever with an untested synthetic gene therapy, for something less risky that the flu, is the route to a long and healthy life.

Why you’d have to be dimwitted enough to believe that the government loves you and cares so much that they would destroy the economy to save you, and exhort such words as ‘None of us is safe until we all are’.

Broken indeed

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
Jun 4, 2021 10:55 AM
Reply to  Corarden

John does speak in the last six minutes of “men of few words” whom he knows are out there 😉

Claret
Claret
Jun 4, 2021 12:12 PM
Reply to  Corarden

‘Who could be dumb enough to believe such a story?’

People who have been injected?

Howard
Howard
Jun 4, 2021 3:28 PM
Reply to  Corarden

I don’t know. Aliens need a break and a laugh sometimes, too. So where would an advanced species on an advanced planet go?

ET: come on down!

-CO
-CO
Jun 4, 2021 11:21 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

There’s a big difference between horses and human beings Moneycircus. The analogy that’s being used doesn’t hold. Although it may be true that some people have been conditioned or trained to accept the current scam it certainly does not apply to everyone.

In fact more people far from being “broken” are beginning to see the light and are willing to do something about the scam given the opportunity.

Unfortunately, at the moment too few organized movements are available to join. However, joining the Common Law Court is a good start to become familiar with CL principles, jurisdiction, Court proceedings, dealing with the police and so on. Although a horse may “never be unbroken” there is no excuse for humans!

Alan Watts
Alan Watts
Jun 4, 2021 11:52 AM
Reply to  -CO

Yeah, that worked well in 1933 didn’t it. And that was a single country who couldn’t muster enough opposition to prevent a certain version of history being told.

For society at large, the outlook is bleak.

For outlaws, more of the same.

-CO
-CO
Jun 4, 2021 12:34 PM
Reply to  Alan Watts

And as the saying goes Alan: “Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it”. We are now in 2021 not 1933 so let’s hope that people will muster up enough opposition to prevent that version of history being repeated! Or if not, its a question of “Your papers please”!

Shelby
Shelby
Jun 5, 2021 10:59 AM
Reply to  Alan Watts

Outlaw as a description is meaningless in times of war.

Shelby
Shelby
Jun 5, 2021 10:56 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

Thanks for that link. Listened to it here on Saturday morning.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 9:50 AM

Has anybody read this piece on Lifsitenews?

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vaccine-researcher-admits-big-mistake-says-spike-protein-is-dangerous-toxin

Allegedly, according to the author, the Spike Protein in these novel ‘vaccines’, is toxic!

May 31, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — New research shows that the coronavirus spike protein from COVID-19 vaccination unexpectedly enters the bloodstream, which is a plausible explanation for thousands of reported side-effects from blood clots and heart disease to brain damage and reproductive issues, a Canadian cancer vaccine researcher said last week.

“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” said Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario, in an interview with Alex Pierson last Thursday, in which he warned listeners that his message was “scary.”

The problem with ascertaining the veracity (or otherwise) is due to blanket censorship of alternate views. A search for Byram Bridle produced very little aside from republishing of the original article and Bridle’s own Website.

https://byrambridle.com/v1.html

But if true, it really is scary! I’m not a virologist, like most of us, I’m reliant on the science being verifiable, so what does one do? LIfesitenews has some dubious opinions eg, on ‘defending the family’ and anti-abortion propaganda, which leads me to suspect this story ain’t true.

mgeo
mgeo
Jun 4, 2021 3:16 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

Rosemary Frei agrees the jab is dangerous to the unjabbed. She just feels it is important to write a whole article dismissing any danger from the spike protein or mRNA as unscientific. According to her, the threat is still “something else”.

ImpObs
ImpObs
Jun 4, 2021 3:40 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

that website was put up under Dr. Brindles name within hours of his first public claim, it’s not his, it’s a hitpiece smear website,

Please note, Byram Bridle has never – at any time – owned this domain.
None of the linked organizations or individuals are associated with
byrambridlecom. You should always register your own domain name.

looks like it was funded by the Canadian Gov since it redirects to scienceupfirst.

“JC on a bike” YouTube channel covers Dr Brindles claims on his latest stream.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 4:24 PM
Reply to  ImpObs

Thanks for this! Much appreciated. I had a feeling that it was fake. As I said, the refs to it were self-referential! This is a perfect example of what censorship does to the truth. Had I been able to cross-reference, to other, independent sources i would have seen that it’s a fake.

kevin
kevin
Jun 4, 2021 4:48 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

The website you posted redirects to a ‘debunking’ site. Here is his university faculty page:

https://ovc.uoguelph.ca/pathobiology/people/faculty/Byram-W-Bridle

Bridle was interviewed on a podcast. It’s a very short interview:

https://omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-sugge

George Mc
George Mc
Jun 4, 2021 9:32 AM

Something odd is going on. I get this “google feed” coming in automatically when I call up the net – and today there was, out of a total of perhaps 20 items, only one reference to the pandemic. The BBC supplies a little more but a lot of it seems to be embodying an expectation of “returning to normal”.

So, what does this signify? Has Event Covid achieved the desired effect? Or is this a phony lull before the next assault? Or is it a long-term combination of the two i.e. they have gone as far as they could at present, but they’ll be back and will engage in periodic scares until the generations eventually submit to a new regime?

George Mc
George Mc
Jun 4, 2021 9:47 AM
Reply to  George Mc

A further possibility is that covid has now been established as “the norm” i.e. a basic and ever-present shadow that can be called up any time it is desired for instant behavioural modification or to provide an excuse for redistribution of materials and services.

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
Jun 4, 2021 10:20 AM
Reply to  George Mc

Climate, “cyber attacks” on the food supply and conflict (target Russia) incoming.

Alan Watts
Alan Watts
Jun 4, 2021 11:58 AM
Reply to  George Mc

It’s not odd. The social engineers know they can only push ONE message for so long before it becomes meaningless.
(A nice experiment you can do is to repeat a word, any word, to yourself and see how long it takes to become just a sound, or symbol if you are doing it silently- btw this is how mantras work)
So, waves are required. Fill people’s mind with something else for a while, then double down on the required message.

These people are nothing if not predictable.
Actually, they are NOTHING but predictable.

Grafter
Grafter
Jun 4, 2021 2:42 PM
Reply to  Alan Watts

THEY are human filth.

mgeo
mgeo
Jun 4, 2021 3:22 PM
Reply to  Alan Watts

This (habituation) seems to be a basic bearure of neurons. E.g., as we look intently at an object, the eye keeps making tiny shifts to move the focal point to a slightly different set of retinal receptors.

Vitor Neilsen
Vitor Neilsen
Jun 5, 2021 5:26 AM
Reply to  mgeo

Pattern recognition

wardropper
wardropper
Jun 4, 2021 1:41 PM
Reply to  George Mc

I reckon that’s a certainty, not a possibility.

Grafter
Grafter
Jun 4, 2021 2:40 PM
Reply to  George Mc

That’s what THEY “think”.

Claret
Claret
Jun 4, 2021 5:28 PM
Reply to  George Mc

Good questions! Nobody knows and the uncertainty of where this whole shitshow is going is also being used as a tool.Thats how the PsyOp works for them I guess.It drives me a bit mental sometimes. Am still trying to be cautiously optimistic but nothing would surprise me anymore.

Vitor Neilsen
Vitor Neilsen
Jun 5, 2021 5:29 AM
Reply to  Claret

Optimists are the most disappointed people.

Pessimists can sometimes be pleasantly surprised

Jan J
Jan J
Jun 4, 2021 7:50 AM

There are some even more obvious questions you should ask yourself before being “wowed” by a study:

  1. Is it a preprint? preprints are like drafts and need to be peer reviewed. It might be gold, it might also be utter rubbish.
  2. Is the study part of a growing body of evidence, or the first of it’s kind to say something revolutionary? cutting edge science is fascinating, but single studies have very low value as conclusive evidence on their own.
  3. Have the findings been reproduced or are they even possible to reproduce? It’s not until the findings are reproduced by multiple other independent researchers that the findings really can be considered “facts”.
  4. Finally, what is the funding and agenda of the people behind the study? it’s extremely naive to think that scientific standards are always rigorously adhered to. Everyone has an agenda, especially when money is involved. Scientists will also “cheat” like the rest of the population: delete unfavorable data, create false results, lie by omission etc.

The reasons above are why you should be sceptical of studies done by pharmaceutical companies for example. Often they are the only ones with access to the data, they have invested sometimes billions in the development of new drugs and their work is often largely not reproducible. Is that “science”? Under a more scientific approach, an independent agency should obviously do all clinical trials on new medicines. I bet the efficacy and side effect profiles would be quite a bit different…. many medicines would not make it to the market.

wardropper
wardropper
Jun 4, 2021 1:18 PM
Reply to  Jan J

I just wish somebody would take a sample of a ‘vaxx’ home and get a scientist friend to analyze it for fun.
Somebody out there has access to an electron microscope, and they could even let us see pictures of this unprecedented threat to the world – perhaps also some tattered remnants of viruses which lurked in boots from WW1 trenches…

Grafter
Grafter
Jun 4, 2021 2:45 PM
Reply to  Jan J

you should be sceptical of studies done by pharmaceutical companies”.

You don’t say. Their ONLY objective is to make money. Lots of it.

Joe
Joe
Jun 4, 2021 7:49 AM

Twitter suspended the inventor of mRNA technology for saying that vaccinated persons could shed the spike protein… that’s a pretty big red flag in my opinion. It’s also not been reported on at all in MSM. Soon surely there will be multiple Fact checkers websites claiming he never said this.

Bruce Tonka
Bruce Tonka
Jun 4, 2021 7:22 AM

This has never been about Covid. It’s about the vaccine.

Bob
Bob
Jun 4, 2021 9:03 AM
Reply to  Bruce Tonka

What do you think is the goal of the vaccine?

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 2:33 PM
Reply to  Bob

First, oodles of moola for Big Pharma and then control, preparation for the coming conflagration.

draeger
draeger
Jun 4, 2021 4:54 PM
Reply to  Bob

passports, biotech & surveillance

John
John
Jun 4, 2021 10:22 PM
Reply to  Bob

I’ll quote from Independence Day “what do you want us to do?” Die

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
Jun 5, 2021 5:33 AM
Reply to  Bob

Depopulation.

Jeff Carmack
Jeff Carmack
Jun 4, 2021 9:28 AM
Reply to  Bruce Tonka

It’s about control.

Automated humanity.

Human internet.

Electric identity.

If this trajectory continues, it won’t be long before only a tiny fraction are permitted to have children.

Via technology.

Conception, pregnancy and childbirth as we have known them will cease.

wardropper
wardropper
Jun 4, 2021 1:20 PM
Reply to  Jeff Carmack

Well, frankly, I would want to spare children from an existence in this horrible mess.
I know it’s not my call, but the potential suffering ahead is unthinkable.

draeger
draeger
Jun 4, 2021 4:55 PM
Reply to  Jeff Carmack
Bruce Tonka
Bruce Tonka
Jun 4, 2021 7:07 AM

Lets assume for a moment that there actually is a covid19 virus (big assumption I know). PM of Australia today: “if you over 70 there is a 10% chance you will die if you contract Covid” Is this for real? WTF!! Am I living in a lunatic asylum? That’s a much better chance of survival than say contracting the flu and you over 70!! In fact given the low percentage one could safely add “over 70 and suffer from some other serious ailment”. In which case any of the usual viruses could be quite deadly. In fact covid sounds like the safer bet!! I mean seriously. We shut down the world for this bullshit!!! Even if it’s true it’s still bonkers. The Government is really terrified that some old people might die naturally from a virus. yeah right. Clearly not. ipso facto there is something else going on and it’s quite obvious. This is a global IQ test. If you fail (get vaccinated) you die. Some other tit bits of info from today’s press conference:
The covid vaccination program in Australia is headed by a military General, huh?
The vaccination council of Australia advises against mandatory vaccination.
btw mandatory? interesting. When did we ever give any government the right to inject any substance into our blood against our will? Let alone a friggin genetically modified virus of unknown origin manufactured by screw everyone for a buck Big Pharma without any testing!!! I’m so sick of this shit!!!

Vitor Neilsen
Vitor Neilsen
Jun 4, 2021 7:23 AM
Reply to  Bruce Tonka
Vitor Neilsen
Vitor Neilsen
Jun 4, 2021 8:57 AM
Reply to  Vitor Neilsen

Presumably this is because the civilians previously in charge got a bit squeamish when they realised they were part of a plan to kill people.

So, employ someone who’s actual job is to kill people, instead, and the qualms disappear…..

Nick
Nick
Jun 13, 2021 2:16 AM
Reply to  Vitor Neilsen

Worryingly you are correct…bring in the psychopaths when the scientists balk at what they have done

Dayne
Dayne
Jun 4, 2021 9:03 AM
Reply to  Vitor Neilsen

As are many of the posh boarding schools, private colleges, business school… As was MTV in its heyday… The plot thickens, doesn’t it.

Dayne
Dayne
Jun 4, 2021 9:01 AM
Reply to  Bruce Tonka

Exactly. Imagine if the illness were real: There would be a big shortage of the medication. A long waiting list for jabs and procedures. Governments would be playing DOWN the risks; or telling us to see a private doctor in Poland if we’re not happy.

In other words, the direct opposite of what has been happening.

Edith
Edith
Jun 4, 2021 10:21 AM
Reply to  Bruce Tonka

I am over 70 and I would put my chances below 10% thank you dear prime minister…….
and if the govt really cared about old people they would actually be doing far more with services so many of them didn’t live in poverty, unable to afford better food and living conditions which would keep them alive far better than a bloody injection of a spike protein…

they cannot make it mandatory as it is against the Nuremberg trial laws…and in reality it is near impossible for many of us to actually make informed comment which is actually required under that code…thus injecting an old dementing person is illegal…some of them may be getting cold feet…the court cases must begin sooner or later…surely lawyers are not going to miss this bonza.

so yes total bullshit….

Corarden
Corarden
Jun 4, 2021 11:01 AM
Reply to  Edith

The lawyers will wait until it is safe to go after the bonanza, or in other words, when they are told to by the very same ‘authority’ who created the situation in the first place.

wardropper
wardropper
Jun 4, 2021 1:37 PM
Reply to  Edith

I believe a typical government response to a tsunami of legal cases is to ignore them all, using the excuse that it would cost the taxpayer too much money…
The criminals are all hiding behind each other because they are so many.

CyndeeJ
CyndeeJ
Jun 4, 2021 4:27 PM
Reply to  Edith

Agree.

And in the US Medicare goes after the assets of people who die in say nursing homes if they used Medicare…. (in 1993 Congress made it mandatory for states to try to recover money from the estates of people who used Medicaid for long-term care, which can cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars per person.)

Making the deaths of inconvenient old people a double win. No more government payouts in the form of Medicare or social security, plus the state—Michigan comes to mind—then by law has to/gets to go after whatever assets the deceased might have.

Grafter
Grafter
Jun 4, 2021 2:51 PM
Reply to  Bruce Tonka

You are most certainly living in an asylum. Maybe try a One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest scenario.

swami
swami
Jun 4, 2021 3:00 PM
Reply to  Bruce Tonka

if you over 70 there is a 10% chance you will die if you contract Covid vaccine

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 4:32 PM
Reply to  swami

Well I’m over 70 and this text is not from beyond the grave.

mgeo
mgeo
Jun 4, 2021 3:37 PM
Reply to  Bruce Tonka

We have given them this right for a long time. To jab us with fake and harmful concoctions, even as they deny us other treatment we seek. For unheard-of diseases. Not just adults but – especially – infants with undeveloped immunity. Despite ongoing injury. Across the planet. This is the insanity of globalism.

Vitor Neilsen
Vitor Neilsen
Jun 4, 2021 6:32 AM

Strange messaging about the emergence of a so called “Nepal variant”

1) Initially reported on front page of a UK newspaper
2) WHO and Nepal deny knowledge of its existence
3) Grant Schapps uses it as an excuse to place Portugal on Amber travel list, ruining lots of peoples in progress holidays and planned holidays.

Is this evidence of them “making it up as they go along”
Or
Simply someone fucked up the narrative, timing wise?

Either way, clearly lies.

Bruce Tonka
Bruce Tonka
Jun 4, 2021 7:08 AM
Reply to  Vitor Neilsen

and vaccination rates go up. Get the picture.

Claret
Claret
Jun 4, 2021 12:21 PM
Reply to  Bruce Tonka

Yes there was some shouty bloke on TV (Question Time) the other night who said the Alpha variant (or Delta,I can’t remember which) is 30% more transmissible even if you’ve been injected(!) so the vaccination rate must be increased. The mind boggles.

Vitor Neilsen
Vitor Neilsen
Jun 4, 2021 8:31 AM
Reply to  Vitor Neilsen

Also the change to travel status was announced on a Portuguese national holiday “corpus christi” 3/6/2021

Anyone else’s numerology/occult senses tingling?

Jojo
Jojo
Jun 4, 2021 9:55 AM
Reply to  Vitor Neilsen

I would say it’s paradoxical programming at its finest

Edith
Edith
Jun 4, 2021 10:22 AM
Reply to  Vitor Neilsen

Basically to keep the state of emergency they need to avoid big pharma legal liability

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
Jun 4, 2021 6:07 AM

Fauci has a boss who’s rarely talked about: Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health. I’d hate for his preening minion to get all the credit.

Maybe Dr Collins is a nice guy. Does anyone have the nice on him?

Edwige
Edwige
Jun 4, 2021 8:21 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

Nothing at all fishy about him:

1) He’s a Fellow of the Royal Society (see Robert Lomas’ book for why that’s significant).
2) Educated at Yale.
3) Appointed to current post by Barrack Obama.
4) Belongs to a group called Biologos. If there’s any info on their funding I haven’t yet been able to find it. Their mission, to synthesise two apparent opposites (science and religion), is classic Freemasonry (it’s what the twin pillars symbolise with the invisible third pillar the synthesis).
5) He’s presented as a Christian but there are sound reasons to think this is a Masonic-Luciferian front. He was supposedly converted by reading C.S. Lewis – who just happened to die on the same day as JFK and Aldous Huxley. Collins’ Christianity is a very strange one which rejects both intelligent design and any changes to the abortion laws. He’s the sort of Christian Obama and Christopher Hitchens loved.
6) His background is mostly in the genome project. He said “It is humbling for me, and awe-inspiring to realize that we have caught the first glimpse of our own instruction book, previously known only to God.” Beneath the waffle about humility there’s a clear Luciferian message that man is becoming god here.
7) He worked overseas in missionary work, a classic intelligence front.
8) He plays in a rock band that parodies religious songs, an obvious mockery.

CyndeeJ
CyndeeJ
Jun 4, 2021 5:29 PM
Reply to  Edwige

There’s this re Collins

https://thenationalpulse.com/news/faucis-boss-admits-funding-wuhan-lab-we-had-no-control-over-what-they-were-doing/

I am still skeptical of why this is all coming it now and why seeming defrocking of Fauci is now being pushed by MSM.

MolecCodicies
MolecCodicies
Jun 4, 2021 6:04 AM

mRNA technology pioneer says Covid-19 vaccinated people can shed spike protein, Twitter says delete this

Twitter recently suspended the account of Luigi Warren, apparently for violating the Twitter Rules. Luigi’s now-penalised tweet addressed his views on whether spike protein is shed by people vaccinated with mRNA vaccines. [He said they can]

For those unaware, Luigi Warren is the current President and CEO of Cellular Reprogramming, Inc, a biotechnology firm based in California. More importantly, Luigi is renowned for his work with Derrick Rossi, the co-founder of the famous biotechnology company Moderna.

Back in 2010, Luigi and Derrick worked together to be the first to describe mRNA-based reprogramming in a pathbreaking paper in Cell Stem Cell, titled Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA. The work was named one of the top ten scientific breakthroughs of 2010 by the journal Science, as well as one of the top ten medical breakthroughs of the year by TIME magazine.

[…]

Luigi pointed this out in an appeal to the flagged content. He mentioned to Twitter how he believes that the reason he was locked out of Twitter is unfair and that he is “the inventor of the technology on which Moderna was founded,” and so he knows what he is talking about.

[…]

Note that Luigi’s tweet claimed that people vaccinated with mRNA-based vaccines shed spike proteins, an idea that has repeatedly been rejected by scientists from around the world.

Penelope
Penelope
Jun 4, 2021 7:34 AM
Reply to  MolecCodicies

Luigi is reported to have said only in minute harmless amounts.
I’ve not yet seen anything well-sourced. It seems obvious that bodily fluids could transmit the vaccine since it enters the bloodstream–blood supply, mother’s milk. Has anyone commented on saliva? sex?

John
John
Jun 4, 2021 12:49 PM
Reply to  Penelope

Yes, quite a few. You need to search with Yandex not Google or Duckduck. Bitchute is also a good source. Some very eminent Doctors have reported it.

Glenda
Glenda
Jun 4, 2021 5:06 AM

I’m surprised this gets such a low star rating. IMV it is extremely beneficial advice for novices in the world of medical journalism such as myself. Thank you Rosemary, yet again. It also makes one aware of how totally inadequate, or non-existent, reporting by MSM is.

Jeffrey Strahl
Jeffrey Strahl
Jun 4, 2021 5:44 AM
Reply to  Glenda

She has obviously stepped on some overly sensitive toes.

Simon Dutton
Simon Dutton
Jun 4, 2021 7:38 AM
Reply to  Glenda

Scepticism is the very basis of scientific progress, and that is what Rosemary Frei is advocating, so she gets five stars from me!

Edwige
Edwige
Jun 4, 2021 7:57 AM
Reply to  Glenda

Some people are very invested in this ‘shedding’ narrative which would be my surmise as to the source of the downvoting.Why they are so invested is something else….

If it means anything, it’s a badge of honour. Articles that everyone likes are usually just singing to the choir.

MolecCodicies
MolecCodicies
Jun 4, 2021 8:53 AM
Reply to  Edwige

Spike protein shedding has enough evidence in favor of it (Pfizer trial protocols, statements from mRNA tech inventor Luigi Warren) that it seems like it should be regarded as at least possible, rather than “disproven” as msm would have us believe.
If it in fact turns out to be true, the implications are obviously terrifying.

Therefore, caution and awareness of this possibility is well-advised, imo.