WATCH: COVID19/11 – Carol Brouillet
Episode Ten of Narratives Intertwined
COVID19/11: Narratives Intertwined is OffG’s new series of short interviews with prominent voices in the alternate media, vocal Covid sceptics and leading figures in the 9/11 truth movement.
The series is intended to both mark the 20th anniversary of the World Trade Center collapse, and discuss how that event helped shape the modern world and, in turn, set the stage for the Covid “pandemic”.
*
Episode Ten of Narratives Intertwined features Carol Brouillet, political activist, author and former congressional candidate for the Green Party of the United States. Carol is the co-founder of the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance and co-creator of the 9/11 Truth Film Festival.
In her talk she discusses how 9/11 bears the usual fingerprints of a psychological operation to frighten people into giving up their freedom, how the “plandemic” is constructed to be potentially even more destructive, and why it’s so important that we work together resist the real virus: fear.
You can follow Carol on twitter and find out more about the 9/11 Truth Film Festival here.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Great
You got my vote. Even though I think Anna has been very good at what she does for a number of years I have always respected the way you have stood up for truth, justice, and “the American way”. I know the odds of your winning are very slim; however, it’s about time that we have a real alternative!! Good luck!
This post was meant as a reply to the comment below. but it became too long so I thought I’d post it here.
Victoria Police, like any other police, is an international institution whose role is to serve as a first layer in multilayered lines of defense to keep the current social order.
This social order is considered as axiomatically given, taken as granted; instead, observed social dis-orders like any other observed phenomena are to be ascribed to causes within the subjects themselves or/and to other local phenomena of the same nature. Higher principles or theories that may point to structural or historical causes that transcend the local and the immediate are not acknowledged in this empiricist way of reasoning.
Empiricism, which in fact leads to human pessimism, is connected to, perhaps derived from, the medieval nominalist way of thinking that sees real existence in singularities only. In a nutshell, to the nominalist, a forest has no real existence other than as an aggregate of trees, and all knowledge about the aggregate of trees we call forest must therefore be reduced to the study of individual trees themselves. In the social sphere, Nominalism has given birth to the individualist, liberal way of thinking: there is no real existence beyond the individual, and what is termed by “society” is nothing but an aggregate of individuals, as Thatcher once said. The individuals here are only conceivable as beings free from constraints and social and historical ties and determinations, and looking consequently to advance their own individuality, – the only existent reality – that is, their “self-interest”. Also all knowledge about this aggregate of individuals consists of the knowledge about the individuals themselves (methodological Individualism).
To see how this is relevant, think how frequently we ascribe successes and failures exclusively to individual merit and guilt. This same way of thinking is also at the root of State and Corporate institutionalized coercion and violence for considering within individuals solely the roots of events. It manifests also in everyday statements like “those who fell for this fraud are stupid”, “those who didn’t fell for it are intelligent”, and so on. Also, I’m slowly coming to the realization of how this way of thinking, the least thing we can say about is that it is reductionist, has tainted the writings of think-tanks such as the CFR and the Trilateral Commission and others of influence in policy making.
For example, what I’ve read so far from Kissinger’s 1975 National Security Study Memorandum 200 about the “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests”, is filled with that empiricist, non-contextual, ahistorical kind of reasoning: the (then?) social, economic and political organization of the West is implicitly taken as granted, as the right and best organization, with no bearing whatsoever with the subject at hand, population growth. The subject is treated as an issue to be dealt with precisely because it may threaten the established social order, and as a local phenomenon wherever it appears, and is explained locally only. Indeed, one of the findings of the memo, as it appears in the letter sent by Kissinger to the president, reads: “Excessive population growth holds back economic development and social progress, bringing on frustrations and tensions leading to instability.” Strongly empiricist as an argument, stopped economic development is attributed chiefly to local population growth and other local circumstances, not considering that the most important reason for economic under-development in some regions is very likely to be found in the very existence of economic over-development in other regions, in a dialectical process; one only has to open a good history book to find out in what context and for what real reasons the under-developed economies emerged and why they didn’t develop. For instance, the words “colonialism”, “colonies” don’t appear at all in the memo, although a colonial past is an important predictor of the lack of economic development. Because, to my mind, population growth is not an issue as soon as economic development, the real issue, is able to provide enough food, water and supplies for a population however large. So the real question is then, why some regions are under-developed economically, but that will lead very far from the subject right into the heart of the matter, the current social order.
One exception that seems to attribute the “issue” of population growth to other factors reads: “With the beginnings of the industrial revolution and of modern medicine and sanitation over two hundred years ago [this is 1975], population growth rates began to accelerate.” One would expect this to be elaborated further; alas, no other mention in the memo of a possible connection between industrial revolution in some countries and what that meant to other regions, and population growth; the word “industrial revolution” itself doesn’t appear elsewhere.
Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Burke and others were empiricists whose thoughts shaped policy making. Hobbes’ political philosophy was strongly influenced by the English Civil War, which he witnessed; empiricist to the extreme, he developed a human pessimism which he expressed in The Leviathan. Burke, a fervent advocate of the American Revolution, opposed the French Revolution, for the same reasons; both and many other empiricists believed that men cannot govern themselves and need to be governed by a strong authority outside themselves to which it is in their interest to submit their freedoms. Freud, developed the same pessimism because of WWI and Bernays took over from him later. Wasn’t Freud able to at least suspect that WWI was in preparation as soon as 1905 with the Moroccan crisis; and even before, at the time British Capital was seeing with sheer horror how unified Germany never stopped growing commercially since 1871, that the war was brought about with all sorts of subterfuges, drawing entire populations into it, even fooling the Socialists of Europe? I don’t know. He witnessed the bloodbath then concluded that men are bad. Empiricism.
Today, that system of human governance is falling apart, and in need renovation because humans, it is believed in high circles, cannot govern themselves.
Kissinger’s argument, “Excessive population growth holds back economic development and social progress, bringing on frustrations and tensions leading to instability.” was not a mistaken argument based on empiricism. It was a PRETEXT to lower population for the same reasons of all would-be dictators– greater possibility of control. Kissinger wasn’t mistaken; he was/is evil.
If somebody comes by and said that they belong to a club where they worship Satan and cut their wrists and mingle their blood, I’ll probably shrug and walk away. In this age where the free individual is at the center of everything (for better and for worse), religious values, like everything else, have been privatised and unfortunately don’t carry much weight any longer. We keep calling them evil and psychopaths but that doesn’t seem to stop them. We perhaps stand a better chance if we focus on their flawed reasoning.
Also, calling them evil or psychopaths is just falling in the same trap they fell into, because we are puting the root of evil in their person rather than in the system that produced Kissinger and their ilk, which ultimately doesn’t solve anything, and which is exactly what they do (empiricism): they don’t solve problems, they manage them locally and temporarily with all sorts of fixes; or if they solve any, they have to create other problems. Why? The system has to carry on, and can only carry on in a “problem solving mode”; for instance, if there is no crime, police will be out of job, and so on.
Nothing short of a radical change in the system will do, and a lot of people who are on the same side as I’m on this tyranny perhaps don’t see it that way: their hope is that the psychopaths are caught and sentenced and back we go to our old system; in that case, imagine what would happen in a decade or so if the system is kept: the next generation will face a worse nightmare than this one, because it can’t help it. If in this one politicians came out openly against their populations, even against children, risking to be lynched, is because they couldn’t help it.
Admin, three of the last comments I tried to insert have been attacked by the Spam Piranhas. Please help!
How does this spam filter work? What is it looking for, exactly? Is it purely automatic, or does each comment have to be approved manually by a Mod?
Not complaining, just asking. In the few weeks since I first posted here, every single comment I’ve made has gone through the spam check, sometimes just for a few minutes, often for well over an hour.
Testing: It is now 12:52 CET.
This is in German, but with English subtitles. I found it very interesting. It’s about who these people in control actually are, and where they came from.
They identify about 1300 of them. Some of them are well known current or former political leaders, such as Tony Blair and Angela Merkel. Most were recruited at a young age from about 30 years ago. None of them have particularly sparkling CV’s, though I guess they all passed the psycho tests. It’s made clear that the Politicians are the Puppets. The cabal in control of them are obviously extremely rich and powerful, and incredibly evil.
Once the problem has been identified, some possible solutions to the problem become apparent.
I give as an example, the problem we have had for many years, which didn’t happen this year. We have an affection and appreciation for all kinds of wildlife. I even like Spiders. Not keen on slugs and snails, but the birds eat most of them. We do not like using chemicals, and rarely do.
However, I do not like Flying Ants. This year they have decided to bugger off to someone else’s back garden. They remember (I don’t know how), but they do not like Boiling Water, being poured all over their ant hills. yes it kills the grass as well, but the grass grows back. It’s the flies that have been the problem this year, attacking our old cat en-masse. She loves being outside, but we have locked her in. She will be fine, when it gets very cold, and the flies die off.
“Ernst Wolff ~ WEF & Financial Goals Behind the Corona Crisis (English subtitles) ”
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/ernst-wolff-wef-amp-financial-goals-behind-the-corona-crisis-english-subtitles_8VadUHnCSrJ7eUx.html
Tony
Tony, thank you so much for this. Gives great insight into how so many countries are controlled. There are other such groups like Young Global Leaders of course– Rhodes Scholars comes to mind. (Clinton was one).
I’ve copies the link & will watch it again. Quite valuable.
Regards
No one gets anywhere in politics without being carefully vetted and staunchly Transatlantic.
The 38-year-old East German Angela Merkel was selected to be a WEF Young Global Leader in 1992, just three years after the fall of the Wall.
Annalena Baerbock (40), current co-leader of the German Greens and likely future Chancellor, is on the Forum of Young Global Leaders.
(And while I’m at it: Klaus Schwab was taught by Kissinger at Harvard for a year.)
This video is lovely. I have seen Carol once or twice online with respect to 9/11 movies and documentaries.
I admire someone who steadfastly walks the walk after all these years.
Bloom where you’re planted.
Thanks Offg for this series. I wish we could hear more of the interviewees. And yet, I’d like to send this video, as short as it is, to friends who question me and tell them that this explains it in a nutshell.
In her talk she discusses how 9/11 bears the usual fingerprints of a psychological operation to frighten people into giving up their freedom, how the “plandemic” is constructed to be potentially even more destructive, and why it’s so important that we work together resist the real virus: fear.
Well, something we can agree on. Fear is the real problem. One matter that – my guess is – most will miss is that those who you point fingers at at are also afraid. And it is their fear that lies behind their authoritarian behaviours.
I still take very strong issue with the twin notions of planning for 9/11 and Covid 19. So let’s see if I have this:
You start out with a certain premise.
You then create a set of complex narratives based on that premise.
And then say that these narratives prove your premise …
That’s circular reasoning.
John, are you saying that TPTB/Mr Global/The-Ones-Who-Are-Being-Pointed-at – that they are also afraid and this is why they are being authoritarian?
You’re talking rubbish; there is no circular reasoning and although there are two separate events with 20 years in between, it’s clear to most of us here that they are linked by both having the banking/corporate racketeers behind them.
Congratulations for at least understanding that the pandemic is a fraud; the bewitched cannot see that. If you genuinely believe the US government on the 20 year old attacks that is frankly astonishing. I’m not going to discuss this further; if you want to investigate the wealth of evidence against the official account, it’s easy enough to find that.
I have come across you before on this, and maybe Craig Murray’s blog. I have always thought you were a decent, intelligent kind of man, and you have been very honest describing yourself, and going out, walking or jogging alone – which I think is great. You didn’t know what the hell was going on with COVID, except we were all being locked up in our own homes, and we still don’t know what’s going on..
I am first to admit, that I sometimes come out with some insane shit, when I am pissed as a fart, at 3:00 am, but you seem to be able to do it when you are completely sober at 3:00pm. I think you are about 15 years younger than me, and I do not think you are working for any Intelligence Agency.
If you are can you tell me how much they pay you???
I thought this was really good “those who you point fingers at at are also afraid. And it is their fear that lies behind their authoritarian behaviours”
But I do have a problem with this “the twin notions of planning for 9/11 and Covid 19”
Can you please explain what you mean?
Are you suggesting that these events, just happened by chance and weren’t planned?
You have got a PhD in Chemistry, so you are not thick.
Have you got Covid?
Tony
I watched alive the second building being demolished, I have seen many buildings being demolished with explosives in their structure and that it what did happen. Not airplane can do that to this kind of tower, and I didn’t see any airplane until later in a video. Firemen said in the beginning that they heard explosions . There’s a lot of material and videos of the people not the ones were in the news, and they are different. Everything melted but the passports were found almost intact. Those ” terrorists” are Saudi-english citizenship and they sue the gov, and they won. Did u see that in the mass media? Of course no. There’s one flight attendant that is hidden because she was the one who analized the cell calls and she knows procedure and they don’t talk with the family on the air by cellphone, and because of the calls she said, that plane is stationary, it’s not on the air. So what did happen with that airplane? And there are hundreds of questions and details that don’t add up. But Julian Assange freed a lot of wikeleaks about footage about the landing on the Moon, and the video of Kubrick confession before he died that he was the director of the ” landing”, so if America can pull that out, we can pull anything and make believe everything.
Another example of the seemingly interminable reversal of the burden of proof.
We don’t start with anything.
We see the authorities claim something to be true.
What they claim is not borne out by the evidence.
Indeed what they claim is the most godawful obvious shite.
Furthermore, what they claim is used to justify attacks on the public.
Therefore we know we are being had.
Mr Pretty, please answer the following simple questions:
2. If the following words — yours — are not an exact description of what the Bush Gang did after 9/11, then explain exactly why not. (Hint: you might be making the buzzword “narratives” do more work than it can manage here.)
It appears that the bribe for a doctor vaccinating a child in the UK has been set to the value of a tenner. Dirty cheap indeed looks the conscience of today’s medical profession.
https://vernoncoleman.org/videos/government-thinks-your-childs-life-worth-ps10
Dirty deeds done dirt cheap… The real psyop = Everyone is for sale…
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243632
Beats me that no matter how deadly or not some pathogen is or isn’t, why any one assumes everyone must get it….life doesn’t work like that. Not everyone gets anything…everything or nothing….no one is doomed to collect jail in the monopoly game of life…or the Mayfair hotel for that matter….but tell that to the model makers
It’s almost like they’ve realised it’s become too obvious that these ‘anti-vaxxers dying of covid’ keep managing to gasp out the final words “I wish I’d taken the vax” so they’ve given it a rest this time:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10005235/Anti-vaxxer-finance-guru-Alan-Steel-dies-Covid-aged-74.html
This time instead they select someone wealthy and with the name/nicknames steel. Even money and being made of steel doesn’t protect you! Tremble with fear and get your vax!!
A bit like those Christian cultists who claim that all atheists undergo deathbed conversions.
Official narrative in trouble so Fraud does what it does, rushes out cover:
https://dumptheguardian.com/theobserver/commentisfree/2021/sep/19/take-care-with-claims-about-unvaccinated-case-rates-covid
Government stats are only ever questionable when they do not fit the official narrative.
I wouldn’t have bothered linking this garbage but I particularly liked the comparison between vaccine injuries and being injured in a car crash while wearing a seat belt. It’s the same thing!
Not working for me. Tried this:
https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/commentisfree/2021/sep/19/take-care-with-claims-about-unvaccinated-case-rates-covid
Spiegelhalter is generally okay – he actually understands numbers, but they do give him a minder for this series of articles.
Now, why dumptheguardian.com? I assume it is better to place a load on their servers but use an ad blocker? Am I wrong?
Edwige, don’t know if you’re aware: It’s official CDC policy that anyone who dies of covid (or the vax) who dies within 14 days of the vax has OFFICIALLY DIED UNVAXXED.
Convenient since I think about 80% of vax deaths are within this period, if I remember right.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me…
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
Martin Niemoller
At some point the vaccinated will figure out that they have been murdered. That a bullet in slow motion is heading straight for their heads. Relatives will die, friends will die. People will talk. When that point is reached we can prepare the gallows.
Now we know why they called pigs.
I think this is where the uniform grunts screwed it up.
Go to link:
https://tottnews.com/2021/09/18/melbourne-freedom-march-full-story
Go to heading: “Police FINALLY get their provocation..”
Video immediately after: “Here is an alternative angle of the now worldwide scenes”
The woman (red jacket, black wig) appears right at the end of the video.
The grunts hadn’t been told about the “busting the line” theatrics, and so they vented their anger on the woman. The msm initially reported the “protester” violence, but now the whole world has seen the police attacking a defenceless 70 y.o. woman.
This is now THE story!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10005641/Policemen-douse-elderly-woman-pepper-spray-Melbournes-anti-lockdown-protests.html
Sep 19, 2021
Horrific moment policemen shove woman to the ground and pepper spray her face as she lay hurt on the road – as protest over lockdown erupted into violence on the streets of Melbourne
– Woman knocked to ground and subdued with pepper spray in frightening scene
– Incident occurred during ugly clashed with protesters and police in Melbourne
– Shocking footage and images of incident sparked divided reaction from viewers
I’ve already said what to do with police and other security services.
Hint: it’s in Africa.
Detroit TV station asks for stories of unvaxed COVID deaths, gets overwhelming response on deaths and injuries from the vaccines
Tim Truth reads some of the posts, from 01:10:00 in this video.
Hey MC, would you mind sharing your discord link again?
It’s new.. but hang in there and we’ll get a few people together.
https://discord.com/channels/885056513146777610/885061457295867914
Clever girl. God bless her.
On following the Doutzen Kroes story I found out that a number of celebrities have refused the vaccine. But try and find info on them! I wandered around a few sites and got held up by pop-ups seemingly interminably. And then when I got through to one that seemed to promise more, I was lectured about how the vax WAS REALLY ALRIGHT and that these celebs WERE NUTS!
I really couldn’t care less about Hollywood – I’ve come to despise them all, but there was one I thought had the spark of an anti-authoritarian: Bob Odenkirk. Just watching some of the Q&A sessions for Breaking Bad/Better Call Saul, he always looks so bored, on the verge of getting up and walking out. I’d hoped this irreverence would carry over to his refusal to get the vaccine, but no; he got it, clapped for its virtues like a good, trained seal, and weeks later collapsed on set with some heart condition (he recovered). Hopefully now he’ll turn, like Eric Clapton, and take the hard, narrow road.
“Arizona sues Biden administration over COVID-19 vaccine mandate; other states expected to follow suit”
Wow! we have such brave State Premier’s in Australia!
What, you think the Australian state premiers would like to sue the federal regime but are too gutless to do so? You think they’re not in cahoots with Morrison, et al.?
I realize this site isn’t really into seeking solutions or fighting back (relative to organization or brainstorming tactics against the oligarchies, it does a good job of dispensing important information via articles and comments), but I can’t help but reiterate my feelings about the smart phone. I’m biased so that should be considered because I don’t own one and never have, never will. And that’s my question, can they make me own/have/possess a smart phone? Or a computer for that matter?
I say this because of the plans for the digital passport and the social credit system that seemingly requires the use of electronics, i.e., digital. Then I saw this article tonight that stated:
“Queenslanders in home quarantine will need to answer to randomly-timed text messages (up to 3 per day) within 10 minutes or risk a visit by the cops, as part of strict new Covid compliance laws announced this morning.”
Queensland Residents in Home Quarantine Will Be Visited by the Cops if they Fail to Respond to Random Text Messages Within 10 Minutes – Investment Watch (investmentwatchblog.com)
That’s coming folks. But my point is, I don’t text, I actually have never sent a text. So what if I can’t do that because I can’t do that? Are they going to issue me a smart phone and make me do it? Is that constitutional, making me own or possess a smart phone? Are they going to issue a smart phone, or make me buy one, to participate in the digital passport/social credit system? What if I refuse to buy one, or accept and use one?
I can’t get over this issue. It seems like a key factor. Anyone with experience with this is Queensland?
Get a gun.
“If the police had been less sure of returning home from their work we would have had fewer authoritarian knocks on our doors” — Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
Anyone quoting the long debunked gulag archipelago and Solzhenitsyn is not clued up
Debunked how? When? I must’ve missed that memo. Please share a link to the info ‘debunking’ his work. I’d love to read it. Thanks.
I suspect that debunked means that Solzhenitsyn is Persona Non Grata since he penned his last (long unpublished in English) work 200 Years Together.
It will be your choice.
You can get a phone or you can starve to death. Its totally not mandatory.
By refusing you actually starved yourself to death despite all the offers of help from those willing to help.
See how easy this is?
I’m not sure about this, Al, but you may be forced to wear a bracelet or anklet which is always on-line and can receive and send texts/messages. You can be tracked 24 hours a day. Perhaps someone can confirm this – as I say, am not sure of this info.
Remember this from when lockdown had been going barely a month?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52409893
I’m in Brisbane QLD. But I have no idea. Things are very sad. I was attacked by 2 staff in a bottle shop yesterday for not wearing a mask. I go online to watch some highlights of the Australia vs South Africa rugby test from Suncorp stadium in Brisbane which was on yesterday…a sea of maskless people. I get attacked in 2 seconds flat in a fucking bottle shop for no mask, but 10 thousand odd people can all sit for a couple of hours in a stadium maskless, cheering, yelling etc?
And the South African team just gets green lit and red carpet treatment to fly in to play a fucking game?? And I haven’t worked in 6 weeks because my job forces me to wear a mask for 6 hours a day?
See, I’m going to start to get pissed off soon enough. And I might be forced to look at my “options”.
As far as the thing about texting back in 10mins. Fuck them. Just fuck them.
If that’s where we are then life is over.
They will then give you an ankle bracelet like when you are on early release from jail no doubt.
Text messages can be sent and received with old-style ‘dumb’ mobile phones, not just smart phones, but at least their fucking surveillance apps can’t be installed on the former. I guess that’s something.
If someone attacked the PCR test in Federal Court the entire plandemic in Australia would fall to pieces. All these idiotic figures like 1500 people tested tested positive for covid and one died. blah blah By the way that’s a survival rate of 99.9933% Pandemic? Really! Wow better add hayfever and pimples to the list.
The PCR test is the tool used for the scam. Destroy the tool and they have nothing.
Crowd fund a Lawsuit. Take it to your local court because the Queen’s High Court is notoriously corrupt (they failed to protecat Assange’s civil rights).
Yes… correct Stephen, the “tests” are the foundation on which this massive fraud rests. But that’s just it tho… No one here in Australia (to my knowledge) except for people like Max Igan is calling out the fraudulent PCR tests, including the handful of politicians criticising the harsh lockdown measures.
A few months back, myself and another person sent irrefutable proof of the PCR fraud to an outspoken politician here in Melbourne, including a video from Reiner Fuellmich and one by Karry Mullis.
That politician completely ignored it. His staff said they would pass it on. I checked with the other person days later and the response had been stony silence.
There’s a suit filed in the Vic Supreme Court currently trying to raise funds about this exactly:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/covid-victoria-legal-fund?qid=f5c88e0d02c284f20197b965046cace9
Also, there’s a paramedic in NSW raising funds to fight mandatory vax:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/john-larter-v-nsw-health?qid=14cc76f65f929ddf34f8205d10d9395f
Did anyone ever notice that the Covid restrictions craze began (in the West) within a few days of the final publication of the Univ of Alaska study proving Bldg 7 could not have collapsed from fires.
The evidence, apparently irrefutable if examined within scientific reasoning.
I don’t live in Utah, but if you try and do this to my wife, I will personally Hit You in The Face as hard as I can, and we we will scrap on the floor.
https://www.sott.net/article/458388-Viral-video-shows-man-following-a-woman-around-grocery-store-SHAMING-her-for-being-unvaccinated
That guy. I really wish he would try that with the wrong person.
Same Tony. I’d smack him so hard he’d swallow his fucking muzzle.
My mrs said she went shopping in our local Aldi’s and a guy decided to highlight a non mask wearer (west indian dude) in a condescending way for not wearing a mask.
Lets just say the non mask wearer did not take an iota of crap from him and effed and blinded him all throughout the shopping saying who the eff are you telling me what do, all the time up to the payment at the checkouts.
The cashiers remained silent and the mask wearer left red faced.
As we all know all the Big Pharma death merchants have been given legal immunity from prosecution for peddling their poison. BUT if a Government mandates or actively encourages the “vaccine”, I see no reason why the Government can’t be sued and possible criminal sanctions applied depending on country (eg. breaches of the Nuremburg code).
Thoughts? As a side note for Big Pharma. No law or immunity can protect you from criminal and civil action if you knowingly caused harm.
Once again, a build up and a let down regarding World Freedom Rally 4.0 that was supposed to happen today. An article on Voodoo covid (it was good) when there could have been reports of rally’s around the world would have been more welcome.
So yea, i am feeling a bit discouraged and let down. I live in a Canadian city of about one hundred and fifty thousand and all it could muster were a few dozen or so brave folks to demonstrate. Passing vehicles rarely honked but more frequent were the middle fingers and obscenities yelled through open windows as they drove by. I have no idea how the Rally’s went elsewhere because of the media blackout (except for Australia thanks to those that posted about that here). I guess it is my own fault for allowing myself to depend on one site for information.
A salute to all who may have rallied for freedom today.
Yes I agree. I love off-guardian but it would be nice if they had some sort of events and notifications page for protest marches, legal cases etc. Talking about the plandemic is useful but at this stage I think we need to be more proactive for all our sakes. Now I wait for the 3 day spam check.
Free Speech Warrior
https://www.bitchute.com/profile/P3stt1EA8D10
Recent Videos
Switzerland: Freedom Rally 09/18/2021
Latvia: Freedom Rally 09182021
Serbia: Freedom Rally 09/18/2021
Washington DC: Beginning of the Banana Republic?
Toronto Canada: Freedom Rally 09/18/2021
London: Downing St Seeing Red
Birmingham: Freedom Rally 09/18/2021
Netherlands: Freedom Rally 09/18/2021
London: Freedom Rally 09/18/2021
Finland: Freedom Rally 09/18/2021
France: Freedom Rally 09/18/2021
Melbourne Australia: The Game of Cat & Mouse With Police Continues
And in the city of Brisbane, Australia – over 10,000 people protest peacefully:
https://cairnsnews.org/
In Melbourne, some provocation and violence from police:
https://tottnews.com/2021/09/18/melbourne-freedom-march-full-story/
To me, this “busting the line” at Melbourne looks too organised and too professional. It’s main objective is to characterise the protests as violent.
This is a short clip (27s) focussing on the heavy in black:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jKLJLjtfWegt
perhaps “Night Time Protests”…would have more of a potent and intimidating impact.
😉
“Melbourne Australia: The Game of Cat & Mouse With Police Continues”
With the public playing mouse? Wrong way round; there ought to be roaming bands of feral public searching to pounce on black beetles.
I imagine what you saw from Australia was pictures of the violence in Melbourne, but in other parts of the country the protests were peaceful.
Gave no trouble to the squad of black bombardier beetles.
It’s a standard police tactic to create some theatrical violence for the msm.
Don’t let the numbers discourage you.
Most can’t be bothered, they just want to get on with their lives, even though it now requires a passport here in BC. They don’t realize yet they’ve traded in their freedoms for a little bit of security.
Keep protesting. The longer this farce continues, the more people will start to question.
Making the most of legitimate protests, at least in the US, requires checking out the groups involved and their leaders. Sometimes people leading the groups have been making millions over a period of years claiming to anti-big government, working for the grass roots, election integrity, etc., please send donation. During the Tea Party era, there were many sincere small groups with tremendous leaders, but they had no money. On the other hand, there were a few large Tea Party groups who made millions of dollars from small donors desperate to save the country. Unfortunately, the rich groups had sold out to the Establishment on day one. Everyone wanted in on fooling mall donors. Various con artists would offer to “help” smaller TP groups with their elections, would fly in from Washington, would attend a local meeting–even solemnly lead the group in the pledge of allegiance as they prepared to send the group in the wrong direction, and “advise” them what candidates they should back. Many of these same “advisors” are still making millions deceiving grass roots small donors in groups with variations on patriotic sounding names such “America First,” “Look Ahead America,” “Turning Point USA,” and the like. I do want to mention here that in June 2014, a local, strictly volunteer group of residents in Virginia’s district 7 did in fact move a mountain by defeating the vicious Establishment Republican Representative Eric Cantor who was also House Majority Leader. Newcomer Dave Brat defeated Cantor. It was very big news and often incorrectly credited to “the Tea Party” which had zero to do with it, in fact the richest Tea Party group rejected Dave Brat early on, didn’t give him a penny. It took several years of concerned citizens walking door to door in district 7 to get rid of Cantor, a standard Establishment guy who never hid his deep contempt for voters in his district and his great love for Wall St. pals. But back to the profiteers. In the case of Look Ahead America, the guy in charge isn’t some new Trump guy although his resume says he’s a former Trump operative. The truth is, the guy spent years with the RNC (Republican National Committee), and currently keeps busy with several income streams in the protest bonanza including some on the fringes of Trump land. This begins to make sense if you know that Mr. Trump, in addition to being King of Vaccines, has, guided by his “star” Jared, merged with the RNC–a horrible group of people who despise Republican voters. Defeating the RNC and Republican Establishment in 2016 was the whole point of electing Trump, a massive achievement, but now Trump and Jared have invited them back in, nullifying the 2016 election and 63 million voters. In 2019 Trump and Jared came up with “WinRed,” a for-profit fundraising monopoly for all GOP candidates, invited RNC to join, and per Henry Barbour, longtime RNC insider, it has “breathed new life” into the Establishment. (ActBlue is non-profit). The point is, in the US, if a protest or rally is being held, I like to make sure it’s not being promoted by “former Trump” operatives or any member of the extended Trump/Kushner family.
Exactly!
Virtually nobody really wants the totalitarian system the insane globalists have bet their entire farm on. But life’s still far better as it is, far better than engaging in war against the insane globalists. War takes time, commitment and resources. And is less ‘fun’ than Netflix and Pizza.
In the meantime, we must protest and organise; it’s the only way to get good at resisting the insanity. How else are we going to set up something far more sane and properly healthy than the current system? No one else is going to do it for us.
I was in San Francisco today at a Health Freedom Rally. It was excellent, spirited, great speakers, but maybe just 200 people were there, as opposed to the thousands that protested and rallied against the war in Iraq. It is really hard in Democratic California, where people sleep unless threatened by a Republican Administration, and most have drunk the Covid19-Kool-Aid. We have also had trouble coordinating with the World Wide Rallies in Germany, or getting their official recognition, or getting listed on their site…
Thousands took to the streets in New York City.
Really? That’s encouraging.
“I live in a Canadian city of about one hundred and fifty thousand and all it could muster were a few dozen or so … ”
At the height of Nazi power, Hitler’s popularity topped 99%. When Germany lost, with 4Million Germans dead, it dropped below 1%.