Rittenhouse verdict puts “broken” Jury system in the establishment crosshairs
Kit Knightly
If Kyle Rittenhouse didn’t break the law, we should change the law”
This quote, from late-night TV host Stephen Colbert, is one of the more concerning reactions to Kyle Rittenhouse being found not guilty of murder.
What law, precisely, Mr Colbert would see changed is never specified. The vagueness only makes the sentiment more troubling.
Other responses have been just as dishonest, manipulative and foreboding.
Amber Ruffin, another late-night “comedian”, broke down in (very fake looking) tears. Ranting about the “fucked up” jury, “white people getting away with murder” and the “broken system”. Trying to insert racial issues that don’t apply, and telling lies about the facts of the case:
In case you needed to be reminded of this after today's verdict. pic.twitter.com/CufF7l3vtw
— amber ruffin (@ambermruffin) November 20, 2021
The “broken system” is all anybody wants to talk about. It’s all over the place.
In Washington, “the Squad” decried the verdict, wailing that “the system is broken”, that it “protects white supremacy”.
Even alternate media aren’t immune. Democracy Now invited the family of Jacob Blake to discuss the verdict, who have no personal ties to the case save the riot was allegedly being carried out in response to Jacob’s shooting. They too wanted to headline the “system is broken”.
But why the misrepresentations and hyperbole? Why race-baiting and manipulation? Why the exploitation of victims’ families?
What exactly do they want to change about the “broken system”?
Is it private prisons?
Is it absurd incarceration rates?
Is it the fact prisoners are used as de fecto slave labour?
Nope. It’s jury trials.
Not just jury trials, however, there are some other areas ripe for “regulation” and “reform” too.
The relentless focus on Rittenhouse “crossing state lines with a firearm” (he didn’t actually, but never mind) would suggest perhaps one potential “fix” is tighter limitations on travel. Covid has highlighted just how much the powers that be really do hate us being able to move around.
Another obvious potential target for these vague reforms is the Second Amendment. The right to bear arms is, ironically, always in the firing line. The USA certainly can’t go full-Australia while guys are allowed to carry rifles around.
Indeed, given how far into the realms of tyranny so many governments are going, all these attacks on the very idea of “self defense” could be a worrying sign.
But, for now, it looks like the first item on the menu of “reform” is definitely trial by jury.
Why do I think that? Well, both Ruffin and Democracy Now make special mention of the jury being “fucked up” and “broken”.
Oh, and this article says so:
After Kyle Rittenhouse trial, Biden still thinks the jury system works. He’s wrong.
Jury trials have been under threat for years, with “educated” middle-class authors writing that, essentially, the law is too important to be put in the hands of ordinary people who are too stupid understand it.
Juries are described as “old fashioned”, “slow” and “expensive”.
Juries are routinely described as racist, too. Before the trial even started, the Rittenhouse jury was criticised for being “too white”.
The Rittenhouse trial is not alone in being used to undermine the jury system, Covid got there first.
In Spring of 2020, the Scottish parliament briefly tried to ban jury trials “as a response to the pandemic”, this was quickly repealed after complaints from the bar association. There’s also talk of removing juries from rape cases to “clear the backlog” and “protect the victim”.
In January this year, Simon Jenkins wrote in the Guardian that Covid has given us an “opportunity” to get rid of Jury trials for good. He would see it replaced with a “trial waiver system”, as much of the US already does.
Trial waiver systems are ripe for corruption, one report describes them as “highly coercive”, and this could easily result in a lot of innocent people pleading guilty to lesser charges because they can’t afford a lawyer or don’t want to risk going to prison. It is not a fair system at all.
Nevertheless, that’s where they want to go – and whether by Covid or Kyle Rittenhouse – they’ll get us there.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
The pro-gun Lobby in the U.S.
An example of irony.
Many on the “conservative” and “right-leaning” sides claim support for pro-gun laws.
Even cheering the recent trends for voluminous rise in gun purchases.
But often simultaneously rally against the “criminal” immigrants crossing the U.S. Border.
Some claim more guns in the hand of more Americans can help protect Americans against those immigrants, and their crime.
Including the importation of dangerous drugs (Meth, Fentanyl, etc.) into the U.S.
NOW CONSIDER THESE FACTS:
“Mexican officials estimate at least 70% of guns at crime scenes in Mexico are traced to the United States.”
“Mexico is facing a growing problem of securing its northern border. Guns from the United States are pouring into Mexico, arming violent drug gangs.”
“In 2019 alone, at least 17,000 homicides in Mexico were linked to trafficked weapons.”
“the Mexican economy caused by trafficked guns totals 1.7% to 2% of Mexico’s gross domestic product.”
The is only one gun shop in all of Mexico, which is behind a fortress-like wall on a heavily guarded military base. To enter the Directorate of Arms and Munitions Sales, customers must undergo months of background checks — six documents are required — and then be frisked by uniformed soldiers.
So, Mexican Cartels are buying more American guns, and using those American smuggled guns to protect their Cartels, so that more drugs can be produced & smuggled into the U.S.
SO MANY GUNS.
SO MUCH WINNING!
I’m generally pro-gun but one must admit the absolute absurdity of this.
Like most topics, there is so much more to the issue than most media ever present, than most people can comprehend.
You surely know all about this, then?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
. . . and this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Webb
If I were on the jury, I’d vote not guilty. And if possible, I’d award damages against the police chief, personally; for systematic failure to do his job.
—
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/court-update-on-woman-who-plowed-thru-blm-street-protest-check-this-video
Court Update on woman who plowed through BLM street protest hitting several agitators…
Dec 4, 2021
She was offered 6 days of community service and one year suspended license and she turned it down. Now she will go to trial.
—
NYC Woman That Drove Through BLM Protest Goes To Court
Dec 3, 2021
NBC News
Kathleen Casillo who drove through a Black Lives Matter protest in Manhattan and injured multiple people rejected a sentencing deal and now faces jail time. NBC News’ Vaughn Hillyard reports.
It wasn’t the jury; it was the judge, and a state self-defense law that was passed when concealed carry was allowed for the first time in the state. Jury trials should be required for all criminal charges–i.e., no more pleas bargainig.
I am a gun owner, I believe in protecting gun ownership laws, I’m also a “Liberal” (the Latin root Liber meaning freedom).
I’ve also never had to turn my guns on another human being, as I am able to intelligently and reasonably extricate myself from situations that may otherwise result in escalating violence.
But there is another issue to this that is troubling me.
True FREEDOM requires great amounts of responsibility, self-restraint, common-sense & such.
For starters, the first federal gun laws were enacted in response to increasing gang/Mob gun violence.
The NATIONAL FIREARMS ACT OF 1934 was passed in response to more Mobs gunning down more rival Mobs (perhaps spurred by the severe economic down-turn of the Great Depression, as economic down-turns typically see higher crime rates).
I’ve heard many claim that getting more guns into the hands of more people would reduce gun violence.
Yet the gang violence of the 30’s, often revolving around “vigilante justice” (truly tit-for-tat revenge), is evidence that theory is incorrect.
And the VAST majority of citizens are NOT trained for emergency nor tactical response situations.
And far too many citizens would allow their tempers and/or emotions to prevail over more rational, controlled and deliberative thought processes.
Imagine a crowded grocery store, or school, or other public space, where there is an Active, aggressive Shooter, and several legally armed “good Samaritan” citizens.
There is chaos everywhere, as crowds of people are fleeing that active shooter situation, running, screaming, etc.
But if several people were then to openly draw their guns, in that extremely chaotic situation, in response to that Active Shooter, with the identity and location of the true Active Shooter unknown, there is extremely higher chance one of those “good Samaritan” citizens may be mistaken for that active shooter. Or several people turning their guns on each other.
Real life is NOT like the movies, where a camera is panned directly on the action, and emergency situations are easily assessed & navigated.
Take the case of the Rittenhouse scenario.
Shooting victim Gaige Grosskreutz testified that he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse, believing Rittenhouse was an Active Shooter, and believing his life was in imminent danger.
Similarly, Rittenhouse testified he saw Grosskreutz pointing his gun at him and felt his life was in imminent danger.
So both people have an affirmative “self-defense” defense.
And yet neither would have faced that situation had they: 1. Extricated themselves from the situation; and 2) Not tried to play the part of Law Enforcement Officer.
It was a chaotic situation, with two obviously inexperienced citizens each thinking they could handle a situation they truly had no business being a part of.
Many on both the “left” and the “right” seem to be missing the larger issues to this event.
And the sensationalized & partisan narratives playing out in response to this event are offering NO true resolutions.
I’m concerned about how the still failing economy is affecting attitudes, and moods, and tempers and such (we’re seeing a period of amongst the greatest concentrations of wealth in modern history, and numerous Historians, Social Scientists and such have pointed to growing wealth inequality as a common source of civil strife).
And, I would wager that upwards of 99 percent of people have little-to-no idea what their LOCAL self-defense laws entail (the U.S. is a Republic, which means the right of citizens to local & general sovereign self-governance, thus laws can differ quite vastly from one locale to another).
I have legally obtained guns, and it’s a bit disturbing how easily those were obtained. I never had to demonstrate any competence in handling those weapons, nor knowledge of guns laws, nor really any safe guards (aside from a background check, which is largely useless when dealing with the human psyche and emotions).
I believe in the right to gun ownership.
But, statistically speaking, more people with more guns means more chances of gun violence.
And greater chance of some of those guns ending up in the hands of dangerous people.
A lot of BLM and other Protesters are engaging in self-defeating actions, when they engage in violence to protest violence. They’re virtually asking for more crackdowns.
Similarly, a lot of pro-gun activists are engaging in self-defeating actions, as they call for & cheer more guns in the hands of more people, which will inevitably (statistically speaking) result in more gun violence.
In regards to this Rittenhouse event, the words of Ben Franklin come to mind:
“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of Masters.”
Which echos the sentiments of the 18th century essays entitled Cato’s Letters (which are often regarded as amongst the most influential writings for the Founders & Patriots of the U.S.):
“Law is therefore a sign of the corruption of man; and many laws are signs of the corruption of the state.”
-Cato’s Letters, #42-
Forget Russia, or China, or North Korea, or Iran as the greatest threats.
Americans are presenting the greatest threats to one another.
Divided we fall.
Meanwhile, the Corporato-Socialist neo-feudal Lords that are responsible for the growing levels of income & wealth inequality in the U.S., are gaining ever-greater wealth & ever-more power.
Leading to more internal strife & civil conflict amongst the “commoners”.
An observation:
There’s no dearth of those on the Alt-Right side of the spectrum to question the validity of incidents like the Rittenhouse imbroglio, or Sandy Hook, or George Floyd’s death/near death experience, etc.
But is it alright to also question the deaths of the athletes who were jabbed? Could those also be hoaxes, perhaps concocted to further divide the population? Or is it heresy to pose such a question? Must the Alt-Right, like Caesar’s wife, be above suspicion?
Questioning events
I think there’s loads of non-alt right people calling out the events you refer to, Howard, including myself – if it were only alt-right people then geez I think I might join them – if no one else is then they’re the smart ones and everyone else are idiots. It’s not about ideology, it’s about us (the plebs) and them (the power elite who’ve been ruling us for millennia using the exact same techniques that work over and over again).
You don’t QUESTION Sandy Hook, Howard. You don’t QUESTION whether an event is a psyop or not. There is no question that an event is a psyop because they tell us loud and clear. It’s part of the MO, the “hidden in plain sight” / “revelation of the method” technique, apart from, generally, serious problems with the basic narrative. You may need to question certain aspects but not whether or not the event was a psyop because of the distinctive MO – and certainly in the case of Sandy Hook and numerous others we know they were completely staged, there is no question of any reality whatsoever – Nobody Died Nobody Got Hurt – NDNGH as they say in the hoaxer world. Two years into my study of psyops I learnt of this golden nugget and have clutched it to my bosom ever since. Every time I look at a psyop I always look for the obvious signs … which will be numerous. Not only do they fake things sloppily and give themselves away in many other ways, they never fake anything so well that anyone who believes their story can brandish it in defence of it. Never – or almost, they are scrupulous in this regard.
When the power elite are rubbing their psyops in our faces good and proper according to a method that has even been clearly identified for us, it is completely inappropriate to respond with “questioning”. If someone seems to be coming at you with an axe and you have an axe on hand you don’t ask, “Hmmm, is it really an axe?” and reach for a blunt knife in response, do you? You come back with your axe.
What we have in response to their psyops is simply our brains. That is all we have but it is also all we need. Our brains to CALL THEM OUT. We don’t question, we call them out. We only have our brains against their power controlling most of the information out there so we must use our brains. Our brains tell us, “Fake!” so that’s what we call, “Fake!”. Hey you there in power, you’re duping us and even telling us you’re duping us so rather than go along with it we’re calling you out.
Why would you be cautious and timorous in this situation? It’s inappropriate. Worried about saying people didn’t die in case they actually did and you might offend someone? They don’t respect the taboos around death, they exploit them, so why would we? You cannot respect taboos if you want to fight against the powers that be – you cannot afford to respect taboos that they most certainly don’t respect but rather exploit.
This is a pertinent quote from Elena Gorokhova’s memoir, “A Mountain of Crumbs”:
.
(Alexander Solzhenitsyn is also said to have said something very similar so I don’t know where it originated.)
And this is the most pertinent quote ever for psyops, the most pertinent:
Edited (“communist” removed as it applies to all propaganda from the power elite)
Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist.
Jabbed athletes
Oh yes, no doubt, some athlete stories are fake. They always mix in the fake with the real and they like to be out front with the types of things that will occur that go against their narrative and with the opposition arguments that will naturally come out. They must have control of the narrative so they want to be in first on the opposition side. Regardless of fakery though we know for an absolute fact that people are suffering severe adverse effects from the jab including death. There is no doubt whatsoever about that. I personally know two people hospitalised – one hospitalised twice after his second Pfizer who’s an epileptic (as if such a person should get the jab when fever is a well-known cause of seizures and a common side-effect of the jab) and the other was a guy with no underlying health conditions who needed a stent in a leg vein put in due to poor circulation four months after the AZ.
I haven’t been paying close attention to the athlete stories myself although a couple I saw looked real enough but certainly one of the first alleged jab-injured,12 year-old Maddie de Garay, is fake and, it would seem, Brianne Dressen, too (part of the same group speaking out about jab-injury). Maddie and Brianne both have very interesting backgrounds connected to bio-technology.
See article about Maddie
https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/07/01/calling-all-critical-thinkers/
See comment on article about Brianne
https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/07/01/calling-all-critical-thinkers/#comment-208455
If Kyle Rittenhouse didn’t break the law, we should change the law.
—
So that was the objective of the Rittenhouse hoax; to attack the Second Amendment. And it was a continuation of Sandy Hoax with “Noah Pozner” playing the lead role. How they love their little jokes! The whole thing was constructed so that Pozner always acts within the law; and this would be unequivocally established during the “trial”. Hence, the law must be changed.
At the time, although the whole thing appeared choreographed, I didn’t give it much attention. There was no obvious purpose to the hoax and I had assumed that connected circumstances had not played out properly. One possibility was to trigger some variant of “boogaloo”. Never mind that it’s an incoherent mishmash of FBI stereotypes.
https://www.adl.org/boogaloo
Yeah, it’s just your classic Problem > Reaction > Solution scenario.
How DO they get away with this basic technique over and over and over. Drives me nuts.
Manufactured problem:
Killing + trial with anomalous verdict
Manufactured reaction:
OMG! Massive media censure
Implemented solution:
Get rid of jury trials! The people are too dumb.
5hey truly thought that they could intimidate the jury and get a guilty verdict like they got with Chauvin. The goal,is always zlways always gun control. Had the verdict been guilty, the left woild be screaming for “new sensible gun control laws” (when we already have thousands (40,000 or some ridiculous number) of gun laws on the books already, none of which a re apparently “sensible” according to the left. Man has an inalienable right to defend himself, his family and his property, but the left think they have th3 right to take that sovereign right away. Thye wish us to become like Australia, where we are witnessing the fact that their government now lords over them like nazi leaders. Heck, they even built “camps”,to round 70 people, against their will, to throw them In for not wearing masks, and they hunt down “fugitives” who escape the camps. Look up the quotes of the Founding Fathers of America on guns and why it is an inalienable right to own them for protection and hunting and sport. It is very enlightening. Our nation’s greatest minds knew that if you disarm the populace, you control their lives completely. One foreign leader proclaimed that they would not invade America because (loosely quoting) “there is a gun behind every blade of grass” there (or something akin to that- they knew it would be suicide to try to Invade a country where the majority owned, used, and were proficient in shooting guns. That alone is reason enough to support the sovereign right to bear arms, but there are many other almost equally valid reasons to do so. The left however, want to usurp the sovereign right, proclaiming themselves more important than sovereign Inalienable rights in the process. They ,yle verdict and Zimmerman verdict were the right verdicts. Man must have the I alienate right to defend themselves, especially,when the opposition is armed to the teeth, which will always be the case in matter how many more 10’s of 1000’s of laws are passed.
I agree with your point that the agenda is gun control, but most of these high-profile instances are fake. There are exceptions, but in most cases, there are no shootings, no dead, no trials, and no juries. They are entirely scripted and theatrical.
The government in Scotland via the state funded legal aid system has been coercing people into conviction for years now by deliberately frontloading payments to lawyers at first appearance, therefore financially disincentivising going to trial.
As for juryless trials for sexual offences; Rape Crisis and its sister lobby groups will keep knocking at that door till they get the right answer.
Scotland was long ago bought and sold for woke gold.
Some videos analysing the Rittenhouse event
Masonic numbers and signs, lack of credibility of injury (10 mins)
https://odysee.com/@PsychoticCacophony:d/3nn:7
Kyle’s acting compared to that of those in other fake events (4 mins)
https://odysee.com/@nagolbud:e/kyle-rittenhouse-just-another-psyop:a
Analysis exposing lack of credibility of wound made by AR-15, origin of name Rittenhouse (4 mins)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XmJ8ag2zhML4/
Interesting intro about Santa Claus, green screen in court, fakery of injury (6 mins of analysis)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/G1v7KSMXALwy/
“According to the Duesbergians the vast majority of “AIDS Deaths” of 1987 were actually caused by AZT. The medication that Dr Fauci was prescribing to treat Aids patients actually did what the virus could not: it caused AIDS itself. In 1988, the average survival time for patients taking AZT was four months. In 1997, recognising the lethal effects of AZT, health officials lowered the dose; the average life\span of AZT patients then rose to twenty-four months.
“According to Dr Claus Kohnlein, a German oncologist, “We virtually killed a whole generation of AIDS patients without ever noticing it because the symptoms of the AZT intoxication were almost indistinguishable from AIDS.” Fauci and the Great AIDS . Swindle. Laurant Guyenot. 27 Nov 2021. (UNZ Review)
Funny how Fauci’s name keeps cropping up. Strange that AZT was an anti-cancer drug just laying around, chiefly because it was more deadly than the disease (unlike some vaccines). Rather a coincidence that following the early demise of SARS-1 there were some experimental “vaccines” that could not be marketed due to lack of opportunity, or tested, even on animals, due to excess fatality. I would never believe that AZ started as ICI Pharmaceuticals, promising to deliver a cure or vaccine for cancer within a few years — still waiting guys.
Meanwhile, Covid, by the Covidians account, seems to invade the cells by using ACE-2 receptors, made available, presumably, by a shortfall in ACE-2 due to the widespread prescription of ACE-2 inhibitors. Vitamin D is reduced by taking statins which also significantly increase the risk of diabetes, a major co-morbidity in serious Covid cases. The majority of deaths are either in the aged or obese — seen the news reels asking what the dying have in common, the answer being “unvaxxed” rather than the more more obvious observation that each of them occupies the space normally reserved for two or three individuals. Their diet (SAD) was promoted by the medical industry, including family doctors.
If I were a doctor I would be glad of the chance to blame everything on a mystery virus.
“the typical UK family of two adults and two children is predicted to spend £33.60 more per week”
Oh really?
Is marriage a form of Imperial Enclosure ? Why is it promoted & defended by The State ?
One of The State’s biggest fears is that the technology it uses to surveille and spy on citizens will be used by them against The State…
Adolf Hitler said to Dr Joseph Goebbels “If we develop a Smartphone, and made sure everyone carried it everywhere, i’d call it a “Volksfone”
‘writing that, essentially, the law is too important to be put in the hands of ordinary people who are too stupid understand it’ – actually, this has been clear for years – if the law is too complex for ordinary people to understand, we need to channel our inner Shakespeare and get rid of the people writing these laws. The law is meant to be our servant, not our master –
the Levite system is to write a law that covers every aspect of human activity or behavior.
Its purpose was to prevent judges from acting a juries.
now the lawmakers want the same idea to limit jury decisions?
I agree there is no place in this world for lawmakers Article I of the constitution, just remove them from the constitution,=they work for the hidden tier in government, the invisible oligarch) and leave only the Article II guys (President and VP) for it was intended in the first writing of the constitution that they be king and backup king)
The right to a trial by a jury of your peers (Part of the bill of rights), Amendment 6 is the last bastion of democracy and it must remain untarnished. IMO
amendment 6 reads
In all criminal prosecutions, e/accused shall enjoy e/right to a speedy and public trail, by an impartial Jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained, by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
Who I ask, that has been charged with a crime by those who run the state, would want otherwise? the jury of one’s peers, mean the culture in which the person performed the
act that placed the accused in the trial is a part of the consideration of his or her guilty. Its a same or similar circumstance thing.
Everyone who went to the same high school all agree the kid did nothing wrong, but the law written is Washington says he did. <=that’s what juries are for.
In my opinion the law that needs changing is self defense..it should be made conditional
upon circumstances.
consider two spaces. . the space of the gang invading strange, to the gang, local commercial space, with intent to change the order of things within that invaded local commercial space and should mean those who wish to defend that space are authorized to come forward with defense adequate to defend the space,
When the invader is armed (and inside that local commercial space), then the defenders should be authorized to be armed. When the invader makes a move to use their weapons, or to violate the space rules, then the defender is entitled to defend, and to use its weapon if it must to defend the space, in response.
The logic is that the invaders have assumed the risk [ that is, the invader has stepped outside of the general rule of the space, the general cultural value and ethics that maintains order within that commercial space] because the armed clash that is about to happen is completely foreseeable.
The defender defendant has no other choice if he is capable but does not defend the space, then the defender defendant has let down his peers, and if the defender defendant does defend the space, and uses his weapon, then he is, according Law written in Washington, a local hero made into a murder by Washington’s rule of law. that’s what juries are for to resolve that top down arrogance with bottom up reality. .
No doubt about Rittenhouse the jury rendered a most accurate verdict and the jury in Charlottesville may also have done the same. Invading and Defending the space is a local matter, because the content, control systems, and morality in operation of the subject space is local.
IMO, both decisions comply with the equal rights 5th amendment and the 14th amendment
“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law”
Is it not a privilege, even a duty of a citizen to defend when law enforcement fails to, or when law enforcement cannot or when law enforcements invites or allows invaders uncontrolled activities within local space? . Suppose the invaders have been head choppers of the kind that chop heads off of local people in the villages head choppers invade..in say Syria. No one but the locals are around, the Syrian Government is busy elsewhere and the invasion is local
The police aren’t law enforcers. They are Gangs of Armed FREEMASON Thugs carrying out contract law mandates, regulations and statutes against fictional strawman, ALLCAPS birth certificate names, to gather revenue for the private, unnamed, unknown shareholders of the incorporated entities named “governments” and “courts”.
There’s no real Syrian war either except the one against civilians to remove them from certain areas earmarked for future corporate use and seizure by the government to use in joint ventures with Chinese and Russian corporations; it’s orchestrated fraud between all the parties – Russia. The US, The Rebels, Turkey, The Kurds and Syria. And of course, like all wars, backed by the bankers and funded through black ops money, illegal drug proceeds and black budgets.
And the beheading videos are also FAKE and obviously so. So are most of the alleged atrocities in Syria and elsewhere, which are continually being exposed. They are as fake as the courts, the media, the government and the Rittenhouse hoax.
Chief Police Officers Staff Association (CPOSA) – Home
The bobby on the beat is not the problem Researcher. It is the senior management who carry out policy and the line managers who direct the investigations or otherwise who, as you quite rightly point out are Freemasons.
They have their own lodges and keep ordinary freemasons out of the corrupt practices that can be employed by the supposed guardians of the people.
Unless and until the corrupt Monarchy, court system HMCTS, HMG Her Majesties Government, the current political parties and Establishment are exposed for the totally corrupt institutions they are then nothing will change.
It is World Wide Freemasonry and its Patron QE ll who has seeded its members throughout all layers of society and business by the use and ownership of the world wide money system. This has provided the currency to buy up all positions needed to achieve the total control of the world to date.
Except for the “Great Awakening.”
The latest eugenics agenda has spawned this movement of the people. The jury is still out on where this will lead but my feeling is that the people have been unleashed and this particular genie will not go back in the bottle.
The bobby on the beat knows only too well, just like us ordinary people, that they are led up the garden path. The Royal Commissions serve only to reinforce this view as the Chilcot Enquiry and the Investigation into Institutionalised Paedophilia show. Just how stupid do these arseholes think we, and the bobby on the beat, are.
The BBC is now shown to be a bankrupt organisation that serves only the interests of the Establishment and the Security Services, who are themselves compromised and corrupt.
The Saville Enquiry whitewashed the Beeb, when a proper enquiry would have led to the exposure of many who worked at the Beeb and in Her Majesties Government. Saville was Prince Charles favourite and had 24 hour access to Buck House. Perhaps he bumped into Epstein and Maxwell there with air miles Andy in tow, that would have made for an interesting meeting.
It is only the people that can recover their authority, which is transferred to
QE ll via the coronation oath of office, and use this authority to sweep away the corrupt institutions of government and institute new structures that will serve the needs of the people and not the Globalists and the Establishment.
“The people united will never be defeated” must be the unifying message backed up with education of the eugenics agenda.
Hi Laurence. Agree with your last paragraph in particular.
It doesn’t matter whether it’s low level or high level police since they are in a similar position as allopaths who poison their own patients because they are following “standard of care” and aren’t aware that germ theory has been debunked over and over.
If large groups of people have a level of control within society (health professionals, police, civil servants, military personnel, government contractors) and are reliant on their income to eat and pay their mortgage (through the monetary and trade system set up by the Masonic banksters) then they will simply carry out their orders, no matter how venal, to keep their job.
The public are not (yet) educated enough on how the world works to understand the bigger picture. Or to know the difference between a mandate, statute, regulation or a legal strawman, or to recite an oath of office to a judge or an officer.
Most police are Masons, the low level ones are persuaded to join lodges. And the type of personality that’s screened into the force include bullies and thugs, sadists, psychopaths and sociopaths.
The main problem is the order following and the hierarchy system within our society. Another problem is that most people accept this iniquitous system without question, and don’t understand that the order following and hierarchy itself is immoral and leads to abuse of power and enables the continued corruption.
I have known plenty of police and they were all corrupt; involved directly in narcotics trafficking and other organized crime. They work in very similar ways to the gangs and organized crime. And that’s because gangs, organized crime and the police have all been set up and created by the same group for the same purpose: To create a culture of order following, membership, occultism and secrecy where the public is the sheep that is fleeced, and the property, power and status of the rich and powerful are protected.
In the end, the police will become victims themselves because their children will be poisoned and sterile if injected. Eventually most of them will be replaced by robots and drones or the UN police, who are Chinese. Much of the policing in the future will be online and done through the internet and mass surveillance systems.
The BBC is Mi7. The media itself was created as a mass brainwashing tool. From the early days of pamphleting, hundreds of years ago to the television and DARPAnet. It’s not entertainment, or information or news, but to manipulate perceptions, behavior and beliefs on a mass scale. Trauma based mind control.
Personally, I’m not interested in ” the last bastion of democracy”.
I want ALL of our democratic bastions back in place.
We shouldn’t be giving an inch.
The “law” as you put it is miss-labelled.
This is done by well meaning people such as your self, as well as the courts and media, perpetrating the miss-labelling, as this serves the purpose of keeping “we the people” in the dark about what really happens when we attend the Court system in the UK.
Government legislation, Acts and Statutes. is referred to as Law, but in reality, are only the rules of the social contract, which is a small part of the way in which we are governed in the United Kingdom.
The social contract, is that agreement, that enables the people to be governed by QE ll and her agents Her Majesties Government [HMG], and is brought about by the Coronation Oath of Office that Elizabeth Windsor was required to take, that enables Her to “govern” the peoples of her various Dominions and the United Kingdom. see Coronation Oath.
The peoples law of “harm no-one” is easily understood and defended, but the Acts and Statutes are a minefield to anyone who does not understand the court language of “legalise”.
I have posted a guide to this posting in the Merriam Webster Dictionary, under the word mandate. “We the people” cannot be mandated against because the peoples law of harm no-one comes into play.
The Nuremberg Code, with its central theme of “Informed Consent” is the guiding principle to be adopted, when coercing the people to accept forced vaccinations. Without fully informed consent there can be no medical experiments.
The government has only received experimental use authorisation which is not good enough. The information now available on the internet refutes the idea that the world is facing a pandemic.
It is more a Plandemic and the likes of Killer Gates Anthony Fauci and all those proponents of the vaccine agenda will go to jail.
Or, roll out the guillotine, as has been done in one protest in Australia. That may concentrate the minds of the criminal elite in this country of Johnson, Witty, Savid. Hancock and the other politicians and doctors who are still clinging to the narrative of jab as many as possible.
Protect the children.
Gillick competency and Fraser guidelines help people who work with children to balance the need to listen to children’s wishes with the responsibility to keep them safe.
When practitioners are trying to decide whether a child is mature enough to make decisions about things that affect them, they often talk about whether the child is ‘Gillick competent’ or whether they meet the ‘Fraser guidelines’.
Although the two terms are frequently used together and originate from the same legal case, there are distinct differences between them. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority 1986.
How can a child hope to understand the the future effects on pregnancy of the gene therapy, miss-labelled a vaccine.[Moderna Website admitted their vaccine is a gene therapy operating system]
Spiked proteins are attacking the immune system of young people and even fit athletes are dropping like flies in their chosen sport.
“Messenger RNA, or mRNA, plays a fundamental role in human biology, transferring the instructions stored in DNA to make the proteins required in every living cell. Our approach is to use mRNA medicines to instruct a patient’s own cells to produce proteins that could prevent, treat, or cure disease.”
Court cases next.
Hail – I have some time from my Covid bed to revel with you here.
Sure you couldn’t find space to celebrate the release of a political prisoner jailed without a jury trial for reporting on a trial with a jury that didn’t ignore the evidence put to it that also acquitted an innocent man being framed by the Crown State of the U.K. and its minions? He can explain why prisons are full. Craig Murray outside Sauton Jail this morning – now much more powerful than when they panicked and jailed him!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTOV0i2zOaw
How about that other jury trial which finally drags the bastards of Empire into a court even as it is setup to hide most of the vile shite – you won’t find it for n much MSM except the fearless Miami Herald here
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article256219157.html
how about some upto date coverage that isnt trying to push buttons?
refugees being urged to drown in the cold sea of Hastings?
dumb fuck foreign office leaderess Liz ‘fucking’ Truss, posing in a nato tank talking of wanting to dismantle NS2!
https://www.reddit.com/r/TakeTheJab/comments/r5e1yc/massive_world_wide_protests_against_the/
“THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING!”
Sack Dan Andrews? That should say ARREST DAN ANDREWS.
Maybe they mean put a sack over his head?
The only answer is trial by A.I. It’s in the pipeline here. It really is Kill the Creditor time. See the Justinian Deception video link by Gordan in memes. Covid is the Qwyet War.
On 18 March 2021 virtually a year after Bs19
U.K Government publishes plans to reform the judicial review process despite its own review panel urging it to think long and hard before seeking to curtail the judiciary’s powers.
Common Law aficianados have been unable to e mail statements to courts and face other stone wall tactics. The system is in place, ready to rumble, no appeal just pay the fine, end of.
If one can be bothered to take the time to investigate enough of these instances of alleged shootings, (I’ve been focusing on those in the US) they are nearly all hoax narratives, staged events and coordinated drills complete with crisis actors and fictional characters as villains or heroes.
This is generally true for much of the news cycle. In order for trauma based, mass mind control to work effectively, a constant barrage of illusory crime and crises are created to illicit a pre-determined and pre-written legislative response to a pre-planned event, while dividing public opinion.
“How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again!” Mark Twain.
Fabricated plots must be constantly manufactured and carried out by governments, justifying their expansionary power grabs, over-policing, over-regulating, the military spending, and the obvious and profitable racketeering through public, private partnerships.
These hoaxes present the illusion of government authority as an undeniable necessity in the “dangerous world” (and neighborhood) illusion. But in reality or even from a statistical point of view, people are more likely to be struck by lightning than be involved in a mass shooting or terror “event”.
Staged demonstrations, fabricated and rehearsed confrontations, faux terror events, hoaxes complete with drills, crisis actors and fake blood packs are easier to control than false flags.
I’ve yet to find a terror event or one of these highly publicized killings, trials or shootings that seemed genuine. They all have the hallmarks of hoaxes: The trials appear staged and absurd. There are Freemasons connected to these hoaxes at all levels: From the parents and relatives of alleged victims, the layers and judges, the so-called NGOs and movements that spring up from these hoaxes like BLM, to the alleged victims themselves.
The same cartel that started the central and retail banks, started governments, backed the corporations that partner with governments, also own all the airwaves, tv, entertainment, media and newspapers. There are no genuine independent voices in the media. So nobody is seriously investigating whether any of these events are real or verifiable. They are simply repeated by multiple outlets until the repetition itself becomes the perceived truth.
“But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. Here, as so often in this world, persistence is the first and most important requirement for success.” Adolf Hitler
We’ve been subjected to two years of fake videos and stories, initially emanating out of China, then the rest of the world, proclaiming there’s a pandemic when it’s obviously not true.
There was never a virus to begin with, let alone a pandemic, which means every single report in the media regarding the so-called pandemic is as much a hoax as the virus and the fraudulent “test”.
Hundreds of thousands of articles and news items, repeated incessantly are irrelevant and nothing more than propaganda, because they are all predicated on the original hoax.
“. . . it is easier to bamboozle than to debamboozle.”
If there’s as much control of the media, and all the so-called authorities worldwide to collude with this obvious pandemic hoax, then why would we (or should we) accept anything reported by “authorities”, police, the courts or the media as automatically true?
Shouldn’t we be questioning every event, and critically examining contradictions and anomalies, instead of automatically believing the events are real or genuine?
“History is a set of lies agreed upon.” Napoleon Bonaparte
Once more people understand these events in the media are more than likely, mostly hoaxes, the trials are faked, the deaths probably aren’t real, and the backgrounds for the perpetrators and victims are fabricated, it’s easier to comprehend why the hoaxes are fabricated and who gains.
“Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich.”
Napoleon Bonaparte
So too, the illusion of government and authority keeps the rich and powerful, ever more wealthy, out of reach and above reproach.
These hoaxes encourage societal schisms and unrest that take the public’s eye’s off the controller’s motives, methods and create mass delusions. Hoaxes and the manufactured schisms of white against black, Democrats against Republicans, Communists against Capitalists, Muslims against Christians, etc., channel public anger toward each other instead of the cryptocracy. People have taken on fabricated identities and false beliefs, using an opposing system of dualism within the Hegelian Dialectic, that only serve the parasitic controllers.
If the cryptocracy have the public focusing on hoaxed events and nonsense like religious wars, race wars, homophobia, gender bashing, or the faux climate emergency, they have achieved multiple objectives. They are profiting from the disinformation through multiple means, including racketeering. The public are being manipulated, fed disinformation and the cryptocracy are studying our behavior online and offline, learning how to better manipulate us, steal from us, create more anxiety and emotional distress, break up our communities and families, socially isolate us, and keep us firmly focused on the trivial and false while they seize all our innate rights and our assets, while simultaneously poisoning and sterilizing us with toxic injections, tainted water, toxic food and polluted air, ringing with electro smog and radiation.
Governments, courts or institutions don’t grant us rights or privileges. We are born with them. No political puppet, no judge, and no policeman has the right to tell me what to do either with my body, or with my physical, intellectual or economic freedom.
Nobody has the right to tell us we cannot contest government claims or criticize vaccines, governmental or health policies.
Nobody has the right to inhibit us moving from spot A to B and that includes moving from one so-called country to another.
It’s obvious immigration and immigrants have been used by governments used as scapegoats for planned economic warfare, destruction and theft from the middle and working class. And now the same is being done to those brave enough to resist the mask or the jab.
People are taught to kick down and kiss up, instead of challenging their leaders, employers and teachers.
The move to socially re-engineer the West into the Chinese model of total state control of all individual assets, control of all speech, movement and even spiritual beliefs, in order to transform humanity into a self policed, internal and external prison of thought and action, under a social-financial credit system, using biometric mass surveillance and worthless, digital tokens replacing cash that can only be spent at the company store on government-approved items, is the ultimate dystopian nightmare. It’s a reality that is closer to being achieved the longer the hoaxes aren’t exposed.
If more hoaxes are exposed or at least questioned, more people will come to see that “governments” are not legitimate, the media are a brainwashing and propaganda tool, and their police, military, courts and hierarchal systems should be ignored and denounced.
Divide and conquer is as old as humanity. And using hoaxes to manipulate the public into conceding their own authority over themselves, their families and to believe in absurdities on a small flickering screen, is nothing new.
“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false” William J. Casey, 1913-1987, Director, CIA. Statement at his first CIA staff meeting, 1981.
Thanks Researcher,
Great stuff as usual from you.
You did, at least, address ‘what can be done’, (exposure of hoaxes).
If it’s only the increasingly limited alternative media, nothing changes, well, it gets worse.
And that’s why I drink (Doug Stanhope) !
+
Excellent comments, Researcher.
Maybe one day we’ll see eye-to-eye on that event which I won’t name.
I miss what to me were the golden days of hoax analysis around 2014-2017 before YT censorship when all you had to do was type in the name of any terror event reported breathlessly around the globe plus “hoax” and you would be richly rewarded with an array of videos including some very creative ones. Melbourne analyst, “Woodrow Wobbles”, who sadly died from cancer a year or so ago, was a great one for matching music to event. I don’t know how he did it but he always picked great songs. These two are favourites:
Walking the Dog by the Rolling Stones – Parkland shooting
The Dentist Song – Parson’s Green
Now, however, with odysee and bitchute upping its bandwith and 153news.net to a lesser extent there’s a bit of a resurrection so if you go to those three sites and enter “Rittenhouse hoax” there are quite a few good videos.
Of course, as psyops are always done “hidden in plain sight” you can ascertain the signs of fakery directly from the media stories yourself but even if you do other people often point out things you don’t see.
I don’t think we can see eye to eye on that event because neither of us can ever know for sure either way.
You’re welcome to post any videos on the subject
Parson’s Green had OTO ritual all over it.
Jack Parson further intel.
“If more hoaxes are exposed or at least questioned, more people will come to see that “governments” are not legitimate, the media are a brainwashing and propaganda tool, and their police, military, courts and hierarchal systems should be ignored and denounced”
I believe their current and probably biggest ever hoax will do more in that department than all previous put together. Only yesterday, my manager told me in our weekly meeting that this whole pandemic doesn’t make any sense any more and that she can no longer trust the government or the media. She has a degree in psychology, is a conservative voter and has had two bio-weapon injections.
Great comment Researcher.
True!
There was this ‘shooting’ at Munich Olympic shopping center. A gunman murdering a dozen kids then shooting himself.
Authorities called up everything available: local police, helicopter squadrons, police reinforcements from hundreds of km away, a special unit from Austria even (you know you’re done for good when you have to revert to Austrian special forces).
They stopped public transport: buses, S-Bahn, U-Bahn, trains (the airport, however, operating as usual). They closed autobahn exits into Munich.
A journalist typed away at twitter confirming he had heard shots near his home in a totally different part of the city.
Someone found a corpse on the river bank.
Witnesses saw 3 men with guns stopping a cab and escaping.
The New York Times (!) had the first witness interviewd live: She had difinitely heard the shooter shouting Allahu akbar.
Videos were being pushed out: One with the shooter materializing out of thin pixels in front of a bunch of kids. Another one with the shooter hiding on a completely empty parking deck. A guy spotting him from the balcony of his high rise appartment. Ranting at him. Meanwhile a lone guy was seen walking quietly and undisturbed across the scene, not heading the voices and the shots.
The gunman vanished for for a few hours.
Then he resurfaced but only to kill himself. His ‘corpse’ was seen lying in the street covered with a sheet but only half. His feet turning outwards.
Later on the shots in different parts of the city hadn’t happened. There was no corpse found by the river. The 3 men with guns were found to be police who had decided to take a cab to urgently relocate. Police insisted that there were no shouts of Allahu akbar. Instead the shooter was definitely a neonazi. His name had to be changed from Daoud S. into David S.
Someone noticed that the helicopter squadrons had been in the area for days, doing mock attacks in the nearby mountains. But they weren’t related to the events, police said later.
The shooter was definitely a neonazi, as they found Breivik literature in his room. He had bought his gun, a pistol, over the dark net. He managed to make it work as it had originally been a mock gun used for theater and film.
An Austrian paper published photos of German cops pointing submachine guns at a line of customers being forced to leave the shopping center in single file, hands raised above their heads. There was a grandpa with his little boy on his shoulders. They had the same look on their faces as the ones we have seen in history books, staring in shock up to Wehrmacht soldiers, pointing their guns at them. One of those cops was a woman. Real guns, no doubt. German papers didn’t print this.
Right. The terror “events“ are staged drills, including the alleged ones in Paris and London, Europe and elsewhere that are initiated using multiple crisis actors (as witnesses) and fictional characters called “extremists“ or “jihadists” as the dead perpetrators. The more you investigate the more contradictions, patterns and hoaxes you find.
If these terror events were real the police, governments and media wouldn’t need to lie, fabricate and promote them.
Yeah. Forgot to add: No burials. All victims originated from the Balkans, Albania mostly. Their earthly remains were flown out.
This point has been refined lately. The churches are doing their part now.
Yes, yes. There were some alleged hit and runs in Canada, purported to be “hate“ crimes. The same pattern… No bodies. No autopsies. Victims are immigrants who nobody knows (except crisis actors who have previously appeared in the media in other stories), with no social media presence or background that’s verifiable. No real motive for the alleged attacks. No actual funerals held but a mass demonstration/memorial/vigil arranged by the government.
Yes. Churches, mosques, synagogues etc., and the organized religions are in on all the fraud/s.
The Catholic church was the first corporation, the first proclaimed authority having ownership over men and all souls, the first organized religion to profiteer and amass land and wealth, the first to send missionaries to lands outside of established trade routes, to convert locals from their belief systems and prosthelytize. The Catholic Church was also the first organization to use inquisitions and torture to silence criticism and questions, creating mass censorship and obedience through fear, and one of the first institutions to use hoaxes (fictionalized stories/gospels) based around generating fear:
Fear of sinning, fear of damnation, fear of retribution from a vengeful god, fear of belief in oneself and our innate abilities to connect with each other and nature.
The objective being, to voluntarily hand over one’s authority to the unseen, unknown, invisible god figure, or the holy trinity and the priest and church hierarchy, who supported the self proclaimed monarchs.
Eventually, governments usurped the church’s role and the priest class in white robes was replaced by the doctors and scientists in white coats.
Once you investigate enough of the astrological-theological connection in the Christian/Judeo religions, it’s easier to see the tales in scripture are likely re-hashed astrological allegories from religions that pre-date the Bible, the Quran and the Torah.
Much of the symbolism and rituals used in church/es have their roots in blood sacrifice (even cannabalism) rituals and various ancient pagan practices.
When a comment is 10 x better than a article.Makes more sense than the article
One must think is the author who wrote this article this naive to believe this kitten house nonsense? or is they also pushing a angle.
Thanks. Hypothetically, if considering whether something/someone is a Limited Hangout, comparing COINTELPRO Disinfo methods, or noting patterns such as cherry picking and wilful ignorance, may be useful.
Repeated Naïveté could possibly be used as a tactic lending credence to, or creating cover for, government and media fraud.
+
Capitalism and democracy were never compatible. Capitalism tolerated democracy so long as it served it – as a means to an end…
Two fundamentals of capitalist emotional economy: 1. always take more than you give (unequal exchange), 2. enough is never enough…
Point 2 is being expressed as “you will own nothing……” They are coming for Everything because Enough is Never Enough. Already you’ve been told “you dont even own “your” body.” It’s Theirs – to experiment on, damage, cast aside… And your “democracy” is helping Them…
Your country is being turned into a child-minding centre. Totally surveilled. Never allowed to be alone (= pathology), never allowed to be unhappy (= pathology), compelled to join in, “share you thoughts”, – with reports of your behaviour written-up each day. (Social Credit Scheme requires such.)
Child-minding centres: training cages for tomorrow’s model citizens.
Interesting. Disturbing. What isn’t disturbing these days?
So no one challenging the shooting narrative at the outset?
I don’t believe it’s real.
I saw the judge do a 666 hand signal, ask about Veterans and then get one to stand up and make the audience applaud, while leaving his phone on in court, to be heard by everyone with the ringtune of ‘God Bless the USA‘.
It was phony and staged. It’s 110% hoax and literally laughable from start to finish.
There’s no muzzle flash from the Rittenhouse rifle. There’s no kickback. The alleged victims and the Shooter (actor) participated in an obviously staged, rehearsed, Masonic psy-op.
And there’s also no evidence of a real head injury.
Rittenhouse was an amazingly bad white supremacist and racist as he managed to shoot three white people, killing two of them.
It was dark.
wow, can the tyranny become more apparent still?
What’ s it going to take?
Colbert is such a useful idiot
The jury system worked just fine in the Rittenhouse case and by and large it works well.
That said this is a call to take the power away from the people. Yet again.
Take more of it from ordinary people.
100% or PlusPlusGood.
i mean “+1”
This truly is a great site, challenging, with some very switched on readers and awesome contributors! So saying this here isn’t as lonesome an echo chamber as MSM. How did it COME TO BE that Western Governments and Corporations are literally, actively seeking our DEATHS? Our SLAVERY? That they seek to destroy ALL our Rights? HOW DID THIS HAPPEN? As importantly, and I’m willing to go there, WHO DO I KILL to stop this? Who do WE, the Collective, seek out and make them CEASE TO EXIST? We had no troubles grokking the existential evil of Nazism, of Communism. Now that Capitalism itself has been co-opted to crush We, The People, in a Corporatists perfect gestalt of bio warfare and economic strangulation, now that ALL THE DOTS are coalescing, WHO MUST BE KILLED? This is an essential debate, worthy of The Now, before “They” crash the Public Internet and go Extinction Level on Us.
There is a whole level of pain in my nation, Australia. We are disarmed. Our very State and Federal Police Forces are ACTIVELY HOSTILE TOWARDS US.I understand that State Forces (AN Aside, NSW Police changed their name from Police Service to Police FORCE recently) have received CROWD SUPPRESSION TRAINING from the IDF, The Zionist Occupation Army of Palestine. Killer Jews… THAT is how Australia deals with Public Protest… My Prime Minister mocks a Federal Independent Commission Against Corruption, one of his coterie just got thrown out of Premier of NSW for being a corrupt and evil whore. Despite her guilt, he is ACTIVELY trying to recruit her into Federal Politics!!! A KNOWN CRIMINAL! His counterpart Dan Andrews, Premier of Victoria, has just installed a virtually zero oversight Medical Dictatorship on the State of Victoria. The new Premier of NSW, his father already works for The World bank! Hellooo!!!! In Horror movies, somebody screams “they COME”!!! at these nefarious, evil schemes. Fellow citizens sleepwalk, well, nightmare creep really, through a National, organised, deliberate Psyop. All designed to cripple decision making or opposition to this hostile, vicious, soul destroying, bankrupting, corrupt, dystopian, murderous, profit seeking, beauty destroying, mind raping, soul killing Late Stage Globocap TREASON.
Simple really. Our Politicians, our Parliaments, our safety nets, our Laws, they are superfluous, tissue paper, vapour, gone. Evaporated. LOST. If We are not read to defend our very Existence WHO WILL DO SO?
I’m talking to you, you piss poor lazy armchair warrior. Is it a Time to Die? Or a Time TO KILL? Do we discuss this? Or wait for the head shot?
Yer in a playground, their playground. Australia is closest to their home. Who to kill ? Huh, good question, everyone out front is a puppet.
I see nothing puzzling about it: We’re at war with the psychopathic billionaire would-be dictators. A part of their strategy is divide-and-conquer. Other strategies under consideration are military war with Russia and Marburg hemorrhagic fever, for which they already have the “vaccine” and the “test”.
And they’re producing scarcity to put the population under pressure. For example:
— Food scarcity thru paying Imperial Valley farmers to plow their crops under; 1/3 of US veggies comes from the Imperial Valley.
–Draining CA’s 5-year reservoir supply of water into the ocean.
–Blockade of unloading offshore ships thru refusing to register the trucks on the pretext that their motors aren’t electric– while NOT MAKING any electric truck motors.
Nothing baffling about it; it’s war, and it won’t stop till we take the stolen wealth and the control of our govts back from them. Start talking about the means to do this and quit being shocked.
Control of governments? You need to abolish them, period.
good idea, back to Feudalism v2 21st century, with no pretense at all of ‘democracy’, just the most brutal gang in their castles ruling – if you think what we have today is bad and that would be better you might want to think about it a bit more, we need to take our govs back, not destroy them, that is only playing into the hands of the new wannabe feudal lords …
A good argument can be made that modern governments were created by feudal lords, who saw the writing on the wall and realized there were enough ordinary people that their feudal hold on society was in jeopardy.
They were only ‘our governments’ back in the days when we had some means to put pressure on them – such as workers could through unions…
There was a time when Australia’s working class party – The Australian Labor Party – had a ‘socialist’ clause in the party’s platform, and spelled Labour with a ‘u’.
Now it’s just an organisation for careerists.
An essential part of taking back our govts is insistence of counting the ballots publicly AT THE POLLING PLACES. No trucking the ballots anyplace, no counting them by computer.
I was a polling-place chief once; I had two citizen assistants, and 20 minutes after the polls closed we had the total count of ballots and for whom they were cast. It could be arranged that such poll-workers (witnessed by any public audience) could simply call the newspaper of record with their total.
All of this being published the next day would allow everyone who participated to check the tally.
I doubt very much that the citizens of CA voted to retain gov Nuisance knowing that it would prolong covid exaggeration. But the ballots weren’t publicly counted. How naive!
Do people actually think this is anything other than staged theatre to keep us divided and distracted
Yes, people actually do think that the elite classes of asses are attempting to completely subjugate the masses. It’s apparent. And we’re allowing it.
That kind of talk makes you a outsiders.
Must say the photo of him or her holding a machine gun total normal.
One jaw-dropping revelation after another:
https://www.spreaker.com/user/williamramsey/researcher-john-brisson-of-weve-read-the_1
Apart from the sheer range of names that crop up (from Rockefeller to Bush to Salk to Ellsberg to Roddenberry and more), two things stand out:
1) The idea of conscious evolution, that the elite want to take control of evolution to wipe those they consider unfit because of their lack of gnosis. She wanted 25% of humanity wiped out and said it openly. I hope those still clinging to Darwinism as the peak of correct thinking will realise they’ve been sold a pup. This is what Darwinism was always really about.
2) Her speech for the VP nomination in 1984 become very revealing once one knows the background of her beliefs. What sounds like standard progressive waffle takes on an entirely new meaning. This is ‘masterful speaking’, the construction of speech that will appear to have one meaning to the profane but has another true meaning that only initiates will grasp.
John Brisson says that he’s not going to get into the mRNA angle too much because they are on YouTube. To which I say, Get off of YouTube! Sheesh! The podcast is lengthy and judging from the subjects mentioned at the outset (Christianity, New Age stuff), not all which I have any knowledge of (The Finders?), I would either find the discussion very annoying or very interesting. But the admission that they are self-censoring sort of puts me off.
Trial by jury and jury trial are not the same. If we had Common Law courts it would use trial by jury. Administrative courts, jury trials, are totally unjust and corrupt. The judge determines the evidence and what is applicable law. This is wrong. The judge should be a referree and neutral. In our confrontation with a Municipal Court, an administrative court, the judge can and is in the process of attempting, along with the prosecutor, to eliminate exculpatory video evidence of my wife’s innocence in a false arrest of a masked-trespassed claim from a local supermarket. The assigned public defenders, the prosecutor and judge all have seen the videos proving her innocence and ignored it as well as ignored the law regarding the responsibilities of businesses as “places of public accommodation” to be non-discriminatory, ignored the State Constitution, ignored state law on the targeted two week limits to states of emergency that the governor has illegally extended for almost 2 years.
If anything, all criminal courts should return to trial by jury, Article three Common Law Courts, where harm must be proven, accused faces actual accuser not a proxy prosecutor as accuser, the jury determines evidence and law, and the judge is a neutral referee. What we have in the US is a kangaroo court of prosecution from three sides with the accused a hapless victim of state vigilante justice.
US Courts are the gatekeepers protecting a corrupt representational democracy owned and occupied by the ruling elite 1%. It protects them from be deposed and us from justice and true democracy.They are corrupt, top to bottom.
Oh and btw, Rittenhouse had no skin in protecting property and was essentially a gun violence tourist looking for trouble. They pulled a gun first and got shot so he’s innocent. But he never should have been there. His action to be involved in gun violence is there for everyone to see and is malicious intent.
Are you a Freeman on the Land?
“Two words Jury Nullification. In a criminal case besides saying one will never vote to convict the surest way of being kicked off a jury is to say those two little words.
“To drive most judges really crazy don’t say them but pass out the above flyer to others toward the end of the trial.”
“Defund the Gestapo and close down the Courts. Make the tyranny and oppression of the Corporate Fascist State Impossible.”
Today is a Learn Something New Day. ‘Jury nullification !’… Thanks Scooper…xxxx.
Good post until you touched on Rittenhouse. Of course he had a right to be there. He worked there. His father lives there. His best friend lives there.The people who were looking for trouble were those who were starting fires, looting, tearing stuff up. Many of them came in from out of town or state and had no connection to the community at all.
Rittenhouse’s demeanor, behavior and intentions were so lacking in malice that the prosecutorial team had to smear him throughout the trial to the extent that the judge had to repeatedly admonish them and threaten them with mistrial and malicious prosecution.
“What is BLM? BLM is a Soros-CIA (Langley-Land) Street Theater Production Company, that subsidizes roving troupes of traveling road show street performers to put on “rad street theater spectacles.” It is as fake as it comes. Not unlike the so-called Jan 6 DC insurrection at the Capitol in DC. Let what happened in Kenosha serve as a warning to those naive or foolish enough to be suckered into participating in one of its spectacles.”
Anyone familiar with Antifa pre-2020 would have wondered who the 2020 Antifa were. From small unknown local groups – to a large, well-funded, create mayhem group of marauders – attacking everyone except fascists ? Not likely.
Made to purpose, with lots of propaganda media coverage. A performance for the media – to discredit…
I was a member of the Bologna chapter of AntiFa from 2005 to 2010. Dedicated anti fascists one and all in a city torn apart by fascist terrorism (the train bombing). What it became must not diminish the original, true version. I am a proud anti fascist of the real kind, not the coopted kind.
+
actjually his father had a store there which he was protecting in part, as the cops (and MSM) seemed to be encouraging looting and violence, then and now, all over the US, at least in the bigger ‘democrat’ (aka ‘deep state’) states
“Rittenhouse had no skin in protecting property and was essentially a gun violence tourist looking for trouble”
Um, no. He worked in Kenosha and stayed on after work.
Unlike these clowns, who literally crossed the whole continental US to be there:
https://nypost.com/2020/08/28/activists-arrested-in-kenosha-after-filling-up-gas-cans-police/
As i understand it he was not in front of his father’s store or the business where he worked. “Guarding” someone else’s business with an assault rifle is specious at best. Anyone who really meant to do this would never do this alone and would be with a crew. He was there to be provocative. He was on a thrill seek. Imho.
Rittenhouse’s Trial Missed an Opportunity to Red-Pill the Public on Color Revolutions
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/11/23/rittenhouses-trial-missed-opportunity-to-red-pill-public-color-revolutions/
This makes sense. I felt like all the BLM “protests” were a perfect fit for a color revolution.
Familiarize yourself with the Star Chamber.
Apart from the obvious denial of the right to self-defense, bringing back the Star Chamber is the end goal.
Of course NaziPedia heavily restricts the information about it, but Alt-Market has a deeper dive that’s worth reading if you actually care about criminal injustice reform.
Also, over 90% of criminal cases (here in the US anyway) are resolved via plea agreements. Just a coincidence I’m sure that our jails are literal torture chambers which stop just short of the insanely high threshold for a standing 8th Amendment claim. Also just a coincidence that 80% of those incarcerated in the US have not been convicted of a crime and are merely being “detained” because they can’t afford bail, which is often ridiculously high because prosecutors overcharging criminal defendants to terrorize them into accepting a plea deal (and thus maintaining the conviction rates that show they’re “tough on crime” and are usually the only thing they campaign on) is a crucial component of the scam.
I have a lawsuit pending in US District Court (that I’ve already won despite the government’s lawyers dragging it out every which way they can and then complaining about the massive court backlogs) over multiple terrorism-related charges in 2016 that even the dumbass cops knew I didn’t commit. The DA refused to indict me, but I was held on a $75 thousand bond in the meantime anyway – yes 75 times that of several notably convicted child molesters in the news recently.
Italy. March of the vaccine dead protest.
https://odysee.com/@photoviapop:8/italydead:d
Yes, that will be an effective approach. And they could start picketing outside vaxx-only events and buildings.
Add some collapsing footballers and I think ya got something!
FYI
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/r5l5v1/its_official_australia_has_fallen_into
You already posted this Scoops… yep, $21909 fine for refusing to wear a mask, refusing to get tested and failure to show id. That’s the lowest fine. And let’s not forget the “illegal” protests.
All this has happened in just 18 months and the vast majority here in Melbourne through their full compliance and rank cowardice and blind trust in the Victorian Govt and Brett Sutton have allowed this to happen. In fact, a lot of them have cheered this on. When I asked at least 15 of my magazine customers if they supported vaccine passports, 14 of them said yes, and that was over 6 months ago.
You can imagine the cops will now deliberately target known “anti vaxxers” with this new law.
“Now another message from Nasty Nazi Pelosi to the general public.”
“CHUMPS. Only little people pay taxes.”
“Kiss our jackboots.”
every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under, presumably this is true also for the surgically altered miscreants that provide the ‘herds’ so called entertainment…
The real problem is people claiming that ‘media personalities’ actually have any brains.
Almost all of them are prostitutes to the nth degree and absolutely none of them look much beyond their own raw naked self-interest.
Why on earth does anyone delegate the moral high ground about the most important features of society to this bunch of cocaine-snorting, morally flexible wordsmiths??
100% agree ⬆️
Essentially the same thing could be said for the political class
Don’t kid yourself, if the viewers had any brains they would turn off the TV. The herd is just plain dumb and lazy.
˄
“Here is another take on the Kyle Rittenhouse trial from the Miltiant (SWP-USA)”
https://themilitant.com/2021/11/27/rittenhouse-verdict-upholds-political-rights-workers-need/
“Meanwhile the Ghislaine Maxwell trial has begun.”
“Will she be acquitted, found guilty or Epsteined?”
Depends if she can put Billy Gates in the frame, bang to rights or not. What about Billy Clinton? What about Netanyahu’s son??
I suspect she would be ‘Epteined’ if those three were exposed as bang to rights…..
If they could grant her bail, she could always her father, Cap’n Bob, Bob, Bob…
Why is the Rittenhouse case being blasted out on the corporate media as a blatant example of the abuse of black people as all 3 of the people he shot legally in obvious self defense were white? Why is he labeled a “white supremacist” when there is no evidence of history in his short life that this is the case? One might think that BLM might approve Rittenhouse’s actions as it rid the world of two white people, and punished a third, who are by definition by simply being white, “white supremacists.” Yet they do not. Why are some of the largest corporate media, especially in the UK, implying and even stating the lie that all three people whom Rittenhouse shot were black? Where are the constant reminders and updates in the corporate media of the horrendous actions of Daryl Brooks, Jr. who deliberately killed 6 people including 2 children, and seriously injured over a dozen others during a parade celebrating Christmas?
I don’t like Victor Davis Hanson. He is a rabid Zionist and neocon. However, even a broken analog clock is right twice a day, and he wrote a superlative article on this disparity and its implications.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tale-two-cities-kenosha-vs-waukesha
While it’s true that those comedic/political class talking points are disingenuous, let’s face it when the state takes control of “justice” there’s a real problem. If the goal is order than there are other, better, ways to achieve it while ensure optimal individual freedom. But that’s not the purpose of the judicial and penal system.
“Nevertheless, that’s where they want to go – and whether by Covid or Kyle Rittenhouse – they’ll get us there.”
Don’t give up, Kit.
I’m still working on the alternative, which is for us to decide where they should go…
Like so many satirist-comedians Colbert isn’t a shadow of his former self.
George Carlin, on the other hand – despite being so blunt that he could hardly be called a satirist at all – stuck to his guns all the way to the end.
Of course his principal aim was to make us laugh, but he also gave us the truth, while still leaving us with enough homework to feel that we could join the final couple of dots and fill in the names ourselves.
We’re not babies, after all.
Well, when we consider that this monstrosity we blithely call “The Law” exists solely for the benefit of the ruling elites; and that anything – like a “Jury of Your Peers” – which may occasionally benefit ordinary people is strictly a bone thrown to the masses to get them to support the system…then of course if the jury system becomes too much of a barrier to the ruling (i.e., psychopathic) agenda, it will go. Period. End of discussion.
Everything hinges on whether the psychos are satisfied that the masses have been sufficiently indoctrinated into the Woke mentality to willingly give up this last piece of legal sanity.
We shall see.
(As an afterthought, perhaps this Rittenhouse incident was fabricated in order to get the jury system more squarely in the psychos’ crosshairs.)
If anybody really wants to know what is going on with all our official systems right now, there is no better source than a hotline to satan.
A courteous member of the team will answer all questions in as much detail as requested, including information on the ultimate goal of this novel initiative.
You can also google “KlauS AT A New normal conference”.
In Norway, the jury system was completely abolished in 2017. It’s not happening just “here and there”, it’s a again a concentrated effort to make these things happen.
A Dr’s Rx:
https://rumble.com/vpynm8-the-right-to-self-defence.html
Oh, please do fight among yourselves more. The more divided among yourselves you are the weaker you are and that brings your final collapse and Balkanisation closer. And your collapse and Balkanisation will be, for the rest of the world, a very good thing indeed.
well.. they say good things come to he who waits… though I think you may be waiting for some time..
because you may not of noticed (don’t feel too bad most imbeciles haven’t)..
this is what collapse actually looks like… so it seems likely you will be getting to experience those lovely old style despotic asian regimes that your current ones are only a shadow of…
thus.. I find your your premise highly unlikely…. that you will be experiencing anything ‘very good indeed’…
because of course even the elitist brahman will have troubles if they don’t have enough phi-sore stock and a red phone to isreal..
so good luck..like most of us you will need it..
According to the Telegraph, face nappies are the perfect catalyst for that
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/11/30/face-masks-became-symbol-divided-britain/
Roundheads vs Royalists
has morphed into
Roundfaces vs Doily-ists
Except that now it’s the whole world over
“You won’t like what comes after America.”
The Ghislaine Maxwell trial is starting and already there are signs that the fix is in.
‘Impartial’ judge Alison Nathan descibed Alan ‘Underpants’ Dershowitz as a “luminary”. This not only indicates that she thinks he’s a splendid chap but is a Luciferian reference.
Whether they think they can get Maxwell off remains to be seen – but the crucial thing will be to erect a firewall around Maxwell so the case doesn’t start raising the issue of people like Wexner or how Epstein seemed particularly interested in many of those trustworthy scientists.
The criminal trial is irrelevant. Maxwell was engaged in a long running insurgency against the US. She was an “alien unlawful enemy combatant” and will be tried as such. Indeed, it’s possible the military trial has already concluded and she’s accepted a deal. Hence, the criminal trial will just be theatrics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Commissions_Act_of_2006#Unlawful_and_lawful_enemy_combatant
—
Senator Lindsey Graham Questions Brett Kavanaugh Military Law vs Criminal Law during war on terror
Sep 2018
Correction (per Wikipedia): Maxwell is a naturalized U.S. citizen but also retains citizenship in the U.K. and France.[1]
—
G-Max – From “The Deep State War 6 – Pedogate” – A Film By Mrtruthbomb (New)
MrTruthBomb
Nov 29, 2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dYr3PuMwrSGq
—
See also:
https://qalerts.app/?q=maxwell
Well, if she was, then sure as heck Epstein was. But Epstein was given every legal leniency going.
Doesn’t say much for the wheels of US justice, does it?
Maxwell was above Epstein in the hierarchy. And Epstein is probably in witness protection.
https://nypost.com/2020/07/16/epstein-was-pinocchio-and-ghislaine-was-gepetto-accuser
Epstein was ‘Pinocchio’ with ‘Gepetto’ Ghislaine pulling the strings, accuser says
By Laura Italiano
July 16, 2020
Ghislaine Maxwell was far worse than Jeffrey Epstein when it came to abusing young women and girls, according to their most outspoken accuser — in fact, she was “Gepetto” to his “Pinocchio.”
“She was pulling the strings,” Virginia Roberts Giuffre told “CBS This Morning” of Maxwell on Thursday, calling Maxwell the mastermind, and a “monster.”
“Ghislaine was much more conniving and smart than Epstein ever was,” Giuffre said.
“I know that woman. I’ve known her really well. Put it this way — Epstein was Pinocchio, and she was Gepetto.”
Re: This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.
—
Graham Questions SCOTUS Nominee Kavanaugh
Sep 5, 2018
USSenLindseyGraham
Senator Lindsey Graham Questions Brett Kavanaugh Military Law vs Criminal Law during war on terror (Starts at 24:00)
The trial is going to be used to release information into the public domain. But whether the public pays much attention will depend on the extent it’s promoted in the media. It will probably get a push only if there’s connection with a big-name celebrity or politician.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/ghislaine-maxwell-trial-opens-faa-accidentally-reveals-700-previous-unknown-jeffrey-epstein-flights
As Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Opens – FAA Accidentally Reveals Over 700 Previous Unknown Jeffrey Epstein Flights
Nov 29, 2021
According to Insider, the records reveal 704 previously unknown flights taken by Epstein’s planes. These include hundreds of trips from a three-year gap in the public record, from 2013 to 2016, when the jets’ movements were unaccounted for. . . . The FAA data does not include the names of passengers.
https://www.businessinsider.com/faa-accidentally-released-jeffrey-epsteins-flight-records-2021-10
The judge has already ruled certain information is not suitable for the public domain and is too ‘impure’.
The same state prosecutor who lost and deleted the Epstein video of what happened in his cell is the lead prosecutor in this case and was recently promoted despite this. Who also just happens to be the daughter of James Comey former head of the FBI and lead Trump antagonist.
No nothing unusual happening here at all …
Speaking of trials and (visible) justice, can I request that OffG puts up an article or two about the Ghislaine Maxwell trial? There has been very sparse reference to the Epstein story on this website – something that surely stands to fill in a lot of blank spaces for those who understand (to paraphrase Peter Dale Scott’s words) “the world’s systems of structures and systems to have hidden trap doors”.
This Twitter account (while it lasts) has 390K followers:
https://twitter.com/TrackerTrial
Consider this article too about Twitters’ changing direction regarding censorship and anonymity:
https://chamber.substack.com/p/vulture-capitalist-takeover-of-twitter
Dorsey was ousted by a vulture capitalist coup, and censorship is about to get a lot worse.
Antifa Bike Lock Prof Not Going To Prison
By Rob Shimshock
Aug 10, 2018
https://campusunmasked.com/2018/08/10/antifa-bike-lock-prof-not-going-to-prison
Professor Eric Clanton will receive only three years of probation — in addition to four days he previously served in jail — after reportedly bludgeoning at least seven people, according to The Daily Caller News Foundation.
The investigation into Professor Eric Clanton is one of the most impressive feats of citizen journalism in the digital age. Users of that delightfully devilish site 4Chan looked at images of the bike lock attacker’s facial structure, clothing, and backpack straps and matched them up with those of Eric Clanton. Police arrested Clanton about a month later and the professor was charged with a simple battery misdemeanor, a felony for causing great bodily injury, three felony assaults with a deadly weapon, and another misdemeanor for wearing a mask to avoid getting identified while committing a crime.
Now, Clanton was facing up to 11 years in prison for these charges. But, get this: California entered into a plea deal with Clanton in which the state dropped all of the felony assault charges in exchange for Clanton pleading “no contest” to the simple battery misdemeanor. Clanton is only getting three years on probation. He already served those four days of confinement.
Remember, this is a guy who, according to police, had bludgeoned at least seven people with a bike lock.
What’s the point of unmasking these criminals if the systems we have in place to punish them refuse to do so, whether out of simple corruption or out of a desire to protect the bad guys, so long as they have the right politics?
—
Rob Shimshock: Antifa Bike Lock Prof Not Going To Prison
Rebel News
Aug 10, 2018
Rob Shimshock of Campus Unmasked can’t believe that bike lock professor Eric Clanton is getting off the hook with only three years of probation.
Well at least he was wearing a mask.
A travesty. Clanton was supposedly a professor of “ethics”.
Honestly it’s almost as if hollyweird is annoyed rittenhouse took out a paedophile and a granny basher and want him punished for it.
This, like Kit’s other recent article on the Rittenhouse trial completely neglects the aspects which stand to make any sense of it at all. I think this analysis is utterly lacking, due, as far as I can tell, to an acute political blindness.
Recently trending debate spaces on Twitter are blatantly anti-white (‘Why do white people exist ?’, for example). Maybe someone can argue that is a good thing, or vice versa, but either way, it is without doubt a ‘thing’, and it is a thing that is permitted and promoted by our power structure, and it is a thing that is so overwhelmingly at odds with concurrent concepts also put forth by that same establishment that it demands explanation.
Only a deeper understanding of race in politics can provide that explanation, and that means going into third rail subjects beyond the parameters of OffG acceptability.
Well you certainly bought the bullshit.
now now ‘george’… stones and glass houses…. where have you been for the last thirty years… buying bullshit perhaps?…listening to mahler wringing his hands?
his point is valid… in case you haven’t noticed everything is racialised on the media ‘tramline’and the rest sexualised… but of course no one is to ever mention that, unless applying regime approved agit-prop newspeak.. . purveyed by vermin..
hollow men 101, dissonate the cogs….
Well I may have misread him in that he is telling us about the deliberately manufactured racism – but then OG is telling us that too. It is certainly not “beyond the parameters of OffG acceptability” which suggests that TM is a white supremacist.
(And miaow with the Mahler comment.)
yes I agree…on whole, the folks hereabouts offer fair and balanced perspectives….
Honest questions george:
If someone writes a flyer which reads, “Its OK to be white” and posts it around town, does that make them a ‘white supremacist’ ? Does it warrant a police investigation for hate crime ? Is anyone who seeks to defend the right of someone to post such a message ‘a white supremacist’ ?
My point was that there is a context to Rittenhouse, and a third element to racial politics, which relates to ‘white’ and ‘black’, and which writers and most comments here seem to either be oblivious of, censored by or self censored around.
I am a universalist in outlook, ultimately, but I am so very tired of those posing as having that same view, yet who steadfastly apply the principle selectively. If it is ‘OK’ (celebrated, in fact) to be openly, explicitly racist toward one group in the mass culture, but severely punishable to even try and defend against such racism, then the inherent self contradiction of that demands a deeper explanation other than “it’s a distraction”.
Elephant in the room.
The answer to any black racist printing ‘Why do white people exist?’ is probably: ‘to blow the brains out of black racists asking such stupid questions??’
I’d love to see the laughter in court if a black lawyer got that response from a white witness under oath…..and hopefully someone would catch the judge having an unguarded smile on their iPhone….
Given that we have gone full ClownWorld, the recent selected Asst. Gov. of VA. in The States has been called “The Black Face of White Supremacy”. Hint: Jamaican American and served in the USMC.
The Rittenhouse trial wasn’t about race though. The 3 people Rittenhouse shot were white. (You’d never learn that from Liberal media.) Only in Liberal media was the case about race. Most interestingly, apparently no liberal commentators actually watched the trial. There was no evidence that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist either, he was a supporter of BLM.
Glenn Greenwald (A Constitutional attorney by training) does a great break down of the case.
https://rumble.com/vphnor-the-rittenhouse-veredict.html
Darrell Brooks agrees with you.
Indeed, they’ll get us there and the reason will be that there are too few Kyle Rittenhouses in this world, especially among the young.
Australians should never have given up their guns, but looking at how weak they have become, I’m not sure it would have made a difference: just watch an Aussie soy boy being ordered around by his wife and you will understand the cringeworthyness.
Of course I am talking about the men. The women will do very little to rescue the western nations: they could help if demos were going to change anything, but since Blair we know that the Davos puppies have been instructed to treat they people as idiots: they proved to be correct. Only violence will end this, which is why they are putting on the pressure over the winter when, they hope, the semi soy boys of Austria and Germany will be too cold for freedom.
Last thing a highly tense situation needs is a woman. Been on this planet the same length of time as men and still think shrieking loudly has a calming effect when the shit hits the fan.
Yeah it never really works out for the best…ah well emotion driven responses are for men too….
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=kyle+rittenhouse+noah+pozner
The attack on the very concept of self-defense is more dangerous imo than the attack on juries. White folks should just sit there and take a beating because it’s a form of reparations? This is the insanity they’re pushing.
The NYT article linked above was written by Tali Farhadian Weinstein. She supposedly fled Iran when she was four. It’s become clear in the UK that people with such stories are descendants of central bankers (Zahawi) or heads of government (Van-Tam). She married hedge fund manager Boaz Weinstein, like you do. That’s an interesting name – Boaz is the name of one of the twin pillars of a certain fraternal organisation and Weinstein was the prompt for #metoo (I can’t find any info Boaz is related to Harvey). Whaddya know but she recived a Fellowship from Paul and Daisy Soros New Americans (Paul is George’s brother) and was a Rhodes Scholar?
+1