How to Memory-Hole a PSYOP
CJ Hopkins
There comes a time near the end of every PSYOP when the PSYOP has achieved its objective, or as much of its objective as it is going to achieve, and is becoming increasingly recognizable as a PSYOP, and so the focus shifts to damage control, and erasing the PSYOP from official history.
This is a crucial stage of the PSYOP, because, at this point, a significant percentage of the public have realized that they’ve been thoroughly mindfucked, and many of them are none too happy about it. Some of them are starting to ask awkward questions, like “why were we deceived and coerced by our governments, global health authorities, and the state and corporate media into submitting to a series of experimental ‘vaccinations’ that appear to be killing and injuring a lot of people?”
Or “why are we occupying and torturing the residents of a Middle-Eastern country that never attacked us, and never had any intention to attack us, and which posed no threat to us whatsoever?”
At this point, it is way too late for those engaged in conducting the PSYOP to continue to deny the facts and gaslight the masses. That won’t work anymore. So, it is time to do some limited hangouts, and some whitewashing, and a little sleight-of-hand, and just generally confuse and distract the public, and send them off on various wild goose chases, while the official history of the PSYOP is written.
For example, say you’re just wrapping up a PSYOP in which you radically restructured society into a pathologized-totalitarian dystopia where the majority of the masses went full-blown fascist, mindlessly following senseless orders, parroting official propaganda, and demonizing and persecuting those who refused to conform to the new official ideology … say you are just winding down a PSYOP like that, and what you need to erase from your official history is the fact that your entire PSYOP was based on nothing but faked statistics, because the pandemic you used as a pretext for your PSYOP was most closely comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1936, 1957, and 1968, so it never remotely came close to justifying any of your fake “emergency health measures,” much less the radical restructuring of society into some paranoid, totalitarian “New Normal” … and now you need to erase all that from history, and you need to distract people while you do it.
Well, one thing that almost always works is what stage magicians call “misdirection,” which means, focusing the audience’s attention on something unimportant while you perform the trick, like … wait, what the hell is that over there?! Is that a MUTANT COMMUNIST VIRUS?!
That’s right, folks, the Pfizer Corporation is engineering SECRET MUTANT COMMIE COVID VIRUS BIOWEAPONS that trigger MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS! Break out your AR-15s and your checkbooks!
Or whatever. I think you get the picture.
This type of ham-handed misdirection is extremely effective on a certain demographic, but it doesn’t work on everyone. Those who haven’t awakened to the Sino-Judeo-Commie-Satanist-Occupation-Global-Government plot to depopulate and culturally Marxify the world with the assistance of global corporations like Pfizer, or who have some knowledge of sleight-of-hand techniques, or basic public-relations tactics, tend not to respond as enthusiastically.
So they need to be misdirected more subtly.
And that’s where limited hangouts come in. As I outlined in a recent essay, limited hangouts are an elegant means of preventing people from exposing your PSYOP. You just “hang out” a limited part of the PSYOP, one that you know won’t do you much damage, and let the masses feed on that. They’ll be so grateful to get a little part of the truth that they’ll forget about the other parts of it, the parts that matter, which you are never going to give them.
So how do you go about doing that, exactly? It isn’t as complicated as you might imagine. All you need to do is pick the right journalists, plug them in, and let them do what they do. They don’t need to be instructed or monitored. You know what they are going to report, and what they are going to avoid reporting.
Take the latest “Covid Twitter Files” for example.
Imagine, you’re Lee Fang, a journalist at The Intercept, and you are given access to the Twitter database to research censorship of the facts Twitter censored in order to prop up the official Covid narrative and ensure that as many people as possible were injected with experimental “vaccines” that they did not need but were coerced into taking, and which have killed and injured millions of people, and, instead of researching and reporting that story, what you decide to report on is the censorship of users demanding access to these same “vaccines.”
Seriously, think about that for a minute.
I’m not suggesting that Lee Fang, or any of the other “Covid Twitter Files” journalists, or those helping to promote them, are “controlled opposition” or anything paranoid (and silly) like that. The most effective PSYOPs don’t work that way. Journalists like Fang don’t have to be told what they are allowed and not allowed to report on. They know that instinctively. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t be who they are and doing what they’re doing. Lee Fang, for example, is a millionaire, working for Pierre Omidyar.
Journalists like Lee Fang, Alex Berenson, and even Glenn Greenwald — whom I like and respect — are the perfect vehicles for limited hangouts. They have the requisite “outsider” credentials while still being members of George Carlin’s “big club” (or maybe just “associate members” … a few million dollars isn’t what it used to be).
The point is, such journalists sincerely believe that they are “independent,” and “adversarial,” and in many instances they actually are … just not when it comes to reporting a story like the most elaborate mass-PSYOP in human history, which is what we’ve been experiencing for the last three years.
Crossing that line would mean the end of everything for them, their money, their status, their social and professional networks, basically, their entire lives. No one has to explain this to them. They got where they are by knowing exactly where that line is, and how close they can get to it, without ever actually stepping over it.
If you ask them, they will tell you “there is no such line,” not for “adversarial” journalists like them, not because they are lying, but because they cannot see it. They have been trained, and have trained themselves, to not see it. As Noam Chomsky explained in a classic interview with Andrew Marr of the BBC, “I’m sure you believe everything you are saying. What I am saying is, if you believed something different, you wouldn’t be sitting where you’re sitting.”
OK, one more quick Lee Fang example, which has nothing to do with the Covid story. It has to do with Matt Taibbi’s latest Twitter Files report. Note that Matt, unlike Fang and Berenson, has the sense to steer clear of the “Covid Twitter Files,” mostly, which is a lose/lose equation for famous adversarial journalists. But that’s aside from the point. Here’s the Fang tweet …
The “Hamilton 68” dashboard was a high level scam to falsely accuse Russian influence behind everything. Their entire opaque system was a fraud, and virtually every media outlet fell for it. Everyone from NYT to Mother Jones should post a correction: https://t.co/sKyNyvyTlW
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) January 28, 2023
Hamilton 68 was not “a scam” and the media didn’t “fall for it.” It was a PSYOP, and the media participated in it. If you think I’m nitpicking, you don’t understand how official narratives are created and maintained. They are not created and maintained with magic or top-secret mind-control technologies. They are created and maintained with words … words that frame events in a certain way, and are repeated and reprinted, over and over, by persons and organizations of influence, until they become officially “what happened.”
You are witnessing the beginning of that process right now. Fang’s tweet is just one of many examples. By portraying the media as the victims of a “scam,” the actual PSYOP in which the media participated is erased, and their complicity is portrayed as mere “incompetence.” This should be familiar to anyone who was paying attention during the “War on Terror.” Compare Fang’s framing (i.e., the media tricked by “a scam”) to the framing of the Iraqi-WMDs-PSYOP, which concluded with the same type of limited hangouts and “corrections” by the corporate press (after the PSYOP had achieved its objective, of course).
As The New York Times put it in its 2004 “correction”…
…we have found a number of instances of coverage that was not as rigorous as it should have been. In some cases, information that was controversial then, and seems questionable now, was insufficiently qualified or allowed to stand unchallenged.
Looking back, we wish we had been more aggressive in re-examining the claims as new evidence emerged — or failed to emerge.
The problematic articles varied in authorship and subject matter, but many shared a common feature. They depended at least in part on information from a circle of Iraqi informants, defectors and exiles bent on ”regime change” in Iraq, people whose credibility has come under increasing public debate in recent weeks.
[…]Complicating matters for journalists, the accounts of these exiles were often eagerly confirmed by United States officials convinced of the need to intervene in Iraq. Administration officials now acknowledge that they sometimes fell for misinformation from these exile sources. So did many news organizations — in particular, this one.“
And so on. In other words, “mistakes were made.”
Again, Fang’s tweet has nothing to do with the Covid-PSYOP or the “Covid Twitter Files.” It’s just an example of how the system works. Even in the “Hamilton 68” story, there are certain lines that cannot be crossed.
The corporate and state media and so-called “papers of record” can be portrayed as “dumb,” “sloppy,” “incompetent,” and even “unethical” and “driven by greed,” but they cannot be portrayed as the propaganda apparatus of a supranational global capitalist system, an apparatus that is functioning perfectly, because that would sound like a “conspiracy theory.”
Which it isn’t, as I believe I have just demonstrated again, and as Chomsky explained in that Andrew Marr interview. There is no “cabal” of evil “elites” running the “PSYOP” that I keep referring to, not in any kind of James-Bond fashion. There never is. There doesn’t have to be.
Yes, there are powerful people in the world, and yes, of course they conspire to further their interests, and to amass more power and enrich themselves, but that is not how the globally-hegemonic ideological system we all live in works.
It works by conditioning us from a very early age to sense where “the-lines-that-cannot-be-crossed” are, and by weeding out and quarantining those of us who cross them anyway. But that’s a topic for another lengthy column.
The point is, the PSYOP that we have all been subjected to for going on the last three years is not going to be exposed, ever. The damage control and memory-holing will continue, and the misdirections and limited hangouts will continue, and the whitewashing of corporations like Twitter and the corporate media and “papers of record” will continue, and the Covid-PSYOP will be erased from history, like the WMDs-PSYOP was erased from history … and people will get used to their “vaccinations,” like they got used to taking off their shoes at the airport.
Eventually, even obsessive “conspiracy theorists” like me will tire of writing about it, and we will turn our attention to less depressing topics. That will be kind of a relief, I guess. Maybe I can finally be funny again … if I can forget about all those dead and severely injured people!
CJ Hopkins is an award-winning American playwright, novelist and political satirist based in Berlin. His plays are published by Bloomsbury Publishing and Broadway Play Publishing, Inc. His dystopian novel, Zone 23, is published by Snoggsworthy, Swaine & Cormorant. Volumes I and II of his Consent Factory Essays are published by Consent Factory Publishing, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amalgamated Content, Inc. He can be reached at cjhopkins.com or consentfactory.org.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Still disagree on Mass Formation front.
Interesting that Hopkins bring up Chomsky, not once but twice—the guy who advocated for separating the unvaxxed from society. Sounds like one more victim of the psyop. https://youtu.be/tqAOUOQWqjY?t=24
Fully concur , ol Chompsky bubbles didnt fare well either when pressed on 9/11, dismissing out of hand the slightest possibility that the event was a false flag , confidently explaining even a government of neo cons “would never do that”, and of course his legendary quote of “nano thermite , whatever that is” …….yeah Noam , whatever that is :)…..so yeah this essay nails it but Chomsky as an example of some one immune to its machinations is a blind spot
Agree totally re the Chomper. It’s even worse though – covered for Kennedy/King/Kennedy assassinations – Advocated for arming Mujahidin in Afghanistan (“fighting with rusty muskets”) – called for US military intervention in Yugoslavia (“ethnic cleansing” canard) – 9-11 – now opposing divestment campaign for Israel – if the man isn’t Mossad/CIA, I’ll eat my shorts !!
No cabal, but . . . Stop and think about it. It parses down to a simple answer.
There is only one place that all the the world poobahs go to in a steady stream– the vatican. Whether they’re religious, secular or pagan, they all beat a pathway to Rome. What does Rome have to offer if it’s only a place of spiritual retreat? Especially to non-religious people, which are most of them that go their for their latest instructions.
Sure, wake me up when all political leaders have to don a cross and kiss the wall of the Vatican. I’m sure you can think of another garment and another wall that they INVARIABLY end up kissing.
A good example of how a Psyop is constructed is the Jack the Ripper case. Some may shy away from things like this as “not serious” but I think 1) this ignores how important crime has been in previous fear psyops and 2) anything that has become such a social phenomenon is unlikely to have become so by accident.
Firstly, there is mainstream ‘Ripperology’. This has constructed a certain paradigm of five “canonical murders” (nice blasphemy) and a rollcall of plausible suspects who are usually nobodies and preferably featured as original police suspects. These writers all reference each other and dismiss any other theories as “crackpot” or “ridiculous” (Hopkins’ ‘the line’). They cite how many suspects have been named and quote the most extreme one (currently they favour Lewis Carroll) to dismiss all of them in a way that reminds me of Stratfordians in the Shakespeare authorship question They reinforce the idea “there are no (or very few) clues” and conclude that “it’s a mystery”. In this camp are the likes of Fido, Sugden, Begg and Rumbelow. Virtually every TV documentary will have a selection of them as the talking heads and no serious dissenters,.
Secondly, there is an “official” conspiracy theory. This was the Royal-Freemasonic conspiracy advanced by Stephen Knight in the 1970s and that forms the basis of films like ‘Murder by Decree’ and ‘From Hell’. It claims the victims were a blackmail circle. This theory appears set up to be easily shot down: the killer (Gull) was in his 70s and had had a stroke; nearly all the ‘evidence’ comes from a crank who claims unprovably he’s Walter Sickert’s illegitimate son; it ultimately reinforces mainstream ‘Ripperology’ by insisting on the five ‘canonical murders’. Stephen Knight then supposedly died suddenly…. aged 33! Knight, I suspect, was a legend who, job done, was retired and the individual playing him could remove the distracting beard and glasses and be redeployed in some other role.
The role of the ‘official’ conspiracy theory was to frame any ideas of Freemasonic (or other Occult) involvement in a paradigm that it must involve Gull. Hey presto, Masonry is off the hook! It was a nice bit of conjuring and it worked for a while. They tried to prop it up in the 1990s by removing Gull and blaming Sickert alone with added celeb backing from Patricia Cornwell. Cornwell’s millions produced some interesting evidence that Sickert may have been one of the letter writers but that’s a long way from being the actual murderer (and the only argument Cornwell had there was factually wrong). Cornwell just happened to reinforce the most important part of the official story – that the murders had nothing to do with secret society rituals.
The evidence of Freemasonic involvement piles up nonetheless. The injuries resemble the fates of the three ‘unworthy craftsmen’ who murdered Hiram Abiff; the writing on the wall after the fourth murder referencing those murderers’ names rather than misspelling ‘Jews’; the marks on the same victim’s face looking like Freemasonic compasses and the double Freemasonic reference in the location Mitre Square; the killings following the phases of the moon and the last (in the canon anyway) falling on 9/11; the presence of Freemasonic iconography like skull’n’bones on some of the letters; the suspicion that a harlot’s uterus would be the sort of thing wanted for a left-hand path ritual (the medical specimen angle was out-of-date by the 1880s, this wasn’t the Burke and Hare era); the openly admitted Freemasonic membership of some of those involved, especially Sir Charles Warren head of the Met Police who also happened to be head of a special lodge and to have been the man who excavated under the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Warren could hardly have conducted a more incompetent investigation (including the outright destruction of evidence and the use of ridiculous publicity stunts while failing to take quite basic measures) if he’d tried – so I rather suspect he did.
Inevitably, ‘science’ was called in to help when all else was failing. This was the farcical pseudo-science of “psychological profiling”. This was all the rage as the 1990s progressed. Profiling caught as many criminals as Freud successfully treated patients (i.e. zero) but played a major role in fitting up the innocent (especially Colin Stagg). It may have fallen out of favour somewhat but still verities that were derived from it are repeated as if facts by the mainstream (like killers don’t change their m.o. or work in groups – both demonstrably false assertions from cases like the Zodiac or the Hillside Stranglers. These claims may be true of most killers who are caught but what about those who aren’t? Like Jack the Ripper).
All one can say is that somewhere between three and perhaps twenty people were murdered in the late 1880s and possibly early 1890s by person or persons unknown. The killer or killers appear to have had considerable knowledge of Freemasonic rituals. The pile of bs that has been built up to obfuscate this simple truth is quite amazing.
(Anyone vaguely interested ought to read Bruce Robinson’s ‘They all love Jack’. This is not to endorse everything Robinson argues but his critique of ‘Ripperology’ and analysis of rituals in relation to the murders is spot on. Robinson was the writer of films like ‘The Killing Fields’ and ‘Withnail and I’).
Have you heard about the book that claims that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was Jack the Ripper? I heard the author a few years ago interviewed on Coast to Coast AM. He made a very interesting case.
Totally plausible … elementary even.
Hmm, so the Elite exist, and they have woven an alternate reality with words, which they use to smokescreen and camouflage their actions.
Certain journalists are so deeply programmed by the the elite and their word-spells, that they automatically know not to challenge those elite and their actions.
In fact, they help the elite by helping to compose and reinforce the alternate reality with their own words.
And yet, none of these people in “the big club” are “breathing the same air”? There is no “conspiracy”?
Sounds like the very meaning of the word to me.
Unintended Con-spiracy. “Con” from Latin, meaning “together with”. Not all the Con-men get together to Con-spire in the same room but, from the Latin “spire, to breathe” as you say, “they breathe the same air”, inspire the same Zeitgeist.
By coincidence I have just now come across a striking example of this “unintentional Con-spiracy” in the early life of Adolf Hitler. According to the family history of Jewish author, Meriell Schindler (“The Lost Cafe Schindler”) young Adolf was the son of a drunken violent bullying father and a gentle protective mother, Clara Hitler. Adolf was devoted to his mother, and grief stricken when she died of breast cancer in 1907. Adolf made sure she was attended by an eminent doctor (one of Schindler’s family) and placed in a more expensive ward. This young man, barely out of school, paid his mother’s medical bills and supported his siblings, as de facto head of his dysfunctional family. (Where the money came from is another story: Clara used to be a domestic servant in a Rothschild house, and was pregnant when she left). But the moral of this story is: that Adolf Hitler came from a dysfunctional family, had a strong streak of sentimentality and moral responsibility, was socially adrift, and it was the 1900 Zeitgeist of Europe (Militarism, Anti-Jewish prejudice and Plutocracy) which steered him toward his final Gotterdamerung suicide among the flames of defeated Berlin.
Thus, a Con-spiracy is as much a social “coming together” of disparate but like-minded people who “breathe the same air” — their Zeitgeist — as it is a coup plotted by a tight knit gang of crooks behind closed doors. I think this was as true in early 20th century Europe as it is in early 20th century EU$A.
Until so-called investigative journalists publicly, specifically condemn those at the highest level of power directing what is now understood as commanding a Fascist eugenicist totalitarian mass murder operation, they are indeed disgusting, misdirecting limited hangouts..
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/never-again-is-now-global/Never-Again-Is-Now-Global-Part-1/
Your article was fine, until I read that people who believe that controlled opposition exist are silly and paranoid. Why would you say this? You’re not a limited hangout yourself now, are you? 😉
Operation Mockingbird and the like are clear signs that the media is seriously controlled. The interesting thing about much controlled opposition is that it does not know it’s controlled.
Remarkable. He denies controlled opposition as well as control by a global cabal and posits, instead, a zeitgeist which magically holds sway over all of us, not sparing even the journalists who are doing the bidding of this invisible force. Turns out no one in employing these journalists ever informs them of boundaries which cannot be crossed or what the propaganda line for the cycle is. Imagine believing that nonsense.
I don’t think that’s what he was saying. I don’t think he’s claiming there is no controlled media, but rather that not all media is controlled, and there’s also a self-correcting system of self censorship at work. That’s how I read it. A2
How to Memory-hole a VICTORY:
Russian Liberators of #Auschwitz banned from VE-Day celebrations. German, Ukrainian and Polish perpetrators welcomed. George Galloway on this NATZO European obscenity. @moatstv on social media.
https://www.tiktok.com/@georgegallowayofficial/video/7193396064307744005
“Which it isn’t, as I believe I have just demonstrated again, and as Chomsky explained in that Andrew Marr interview. There is no “cabal” of evil “elites” running the “PSYOP” that I keep referring to, not in any kind of James-Bond fashion. There never is. There doesn’t have to be.
Yes, there are powerful people in the world, and yes, of course they conspire to further their interests, and to amass more power and enrich themselves, but that is not how the globally-hegemonic ideological system we all live in works.”
Don’t those 2 paragraphs contradict?
Care to name who you think those powerful people are?
It’s just Klaus, Bill and his ex-wife atm but they’re looking to recruit more.
There certainly is a small group of figures that control much of the world we live in. Quigley calls them “the international bankers”. Check https://odysee.com/The-Web-of-Debt(audiobook):1, it has some great history behind this (non-existing) cabal.
Remember the old saying: “The Devil’s greatest trick was convincing everyone that he doesn’t exist”. The Cabal is just following the same principles. It forces people to focus on the symptoms and not the source, as the source cannot be identified.
Nice 👌
If this video tells me anything it’s don’t trust Fyza and big pharma. Big pharma make you sick to profit, they lie and if it wasn’t for them we wouldn’t be in this mess.
Yeah great psyop.
As I stated on CJ’s limited hangout article, Victor Marchetti, is an ALLEGED ex-CIA agent but gives all indications of very much being a current CIA agent until he died. As the saying goes, “There is no such thing as an ex-CIA agent, there is no ex.”
As the CIA popularised the term “conspiracy theorist” we should be mightily suspicious of any other terms they offer us.
It’s very simple: a propaganda technique is to mix truth with lies, it is used ALL THE TIME – in the leadup to the psyop, during the psyop, at the tail end of the psyop and after the psyop. It is not desperately reached for necessarily at all although perhaps it might be – how can you tell when it’s so much part and parcel? Misdirection is part and parcel of psyoppery, all part and parcel.
Best to eschew any term provided by the CIA. Don’t you think what might appear as “limited hangout” might ALL be lies and just seem like truth mixed with lies? What we can never underestimate is how much they predict how things will pan out so while it might seem as though they’re desperately reaching for something to “hang out” as misdirection that may well have been part of their plan all along. They operate with a bag of tricks they know will just keep on keeping on one way or another.
I’m not sure the CIA is as smart as you imply. After all, they are humans – and humans do tend to let things like hubris and assumption and ambition color their judgment.
The fact that they had to end up murdering JFK indicates they had gotten themselves in a pickle (or a jam: take your pick) and couldn’t smooth (or schmooze) their way out of it.
Any truly savvy organization – like the central bankers – would never blow their cover. Nor would they see blowing their cover as a neat strategy.
Which actually makes the CIA all the more dangerous.
They don’t have to be that smart. What’s obvious is that the power elite who’ve been ruling us for millennia have learnt propaganda tricks they’ve passed on down the generations that somehow the plebs just never seem to catch onto. One of the most obvious is that they target both the believers and the disbelievers alike. So many people believe that who was effectively responsible for 9/11 was Israel – even when I believed all the Israel propaganda I wondered how people could think Israel was responsible when obviously everything would have been under the auspices of the US government – a priori Israel couldn’t have had much to do with the supposed failure of air defence could it which is the first thing to happen, not the buildings. When you recognise that 9/11 was effectively a massive drill where all that happened was destruction of buildings not a “false flag” per se you can see that every man and his dog was in on 9/11 including my own PM, little Johnny Howard who just happened to be paying a visit to Washington on the fateful day.
Funny you should mention JFK because just as they targeted both the anticipated believers and the disbelievers for 9/11 they did the same for JFK. How many people who don’t believe the official narrative of JFK think that Lee Harvey Oswald was really shot? Now come on, that’s ridiculous. He says, “I’m just the patsy,” bang he’s dead to silence him. Nothing could be more ludicrous. How are they ever going to hire any more agents if they think they shoot them for real in operations when they cry, “I’m just the patsy”? And why would they kill him for real when he’s just playing a role? It makes absolutely no sense. Moreover, they tell us clearly he wasn’t killed for real because the famous photo doesn’t match a single still in the “live shooting” – the matching is way, way off. Everything looks completely different.
So Lee Harvey Oswald wasn’t killed. How about JFK? Do you think they would really shoot him in that very precarious situation for real? Do not ask me what happened to him though I cannot help you there. I’ve heard he was seen in public since the alleged assassination but I haven’t seen clear evidence.
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/jfk—fake-assassination.html
Interesting. Kind of reminds me of a line from the X-FIles movie, where Martin Landau’s character says, in effect, that very few even ask the right questions, let alone have the right answers.
What do any of us really know? Not much, apparently. We only “know” what we see and hear with our own eyes and ears, and maybe not even then.
Understanding this, I return again and again to simple, a priori truths, such as, all men desire to rule others, and governments are the most conspicuous way to accomplish this. To accomplish this, governments and their agents lie all the time.
Regarding the JFK assassination, if that didn’t really happen, what does that say about the obvious lesson which could be drawn from that supposed event, which is that people who stray too far from the approved narrative do get erased? Does that not happen in real life? I can accept the possibility that Oswald was not really murdered. But too many eyewitnesses saw JFK gunned down. I think that did happen. Otherwise, how do you keep your people in line?
I’ll check out the link.
RE: As the CIA popularised the term “conspiracy theorist”
That is an odd way of putting it. What the CIA did is weaponize the term.
Yes, that’s a much more accurate way of putting it, Tom.
It is like going down a one-way road. It can not be taken back. The damage is done.
hoodwinked anyway – we turn for the better 🤗
Instead of using theoretical interpretations how the connections might be or not might be regarding af psyop or not, consider the obvious – Go direct to the horses’ mouth. They don’t care about the intellectual statements and discussions between the inhabitants around the globe, as they will use all, meaning ALL forces to reach their goal.
THIS IS THE REAL PSYOP/CONSPIRACY
In the “center” of the United States 405 E 42nd Street, New York, You can see the headquarter of the United Nations. Despite the statements made by all of us, the people running this “community” of madness, will enforce it to everyone. The end goal is to unite all nations under one world government, ruled by one world leader and it will happen, caused by the forces behind the people running the agenda. The framework for the future is established in this “community”, despite the mindset and intelligence we can achieve against the madness behind the “beautiful” words they use to their kind of unity thoughts. Why their agenda will happen is not by “prophetic” knowledge”, but purely implemented by force. They prepare the future to happen and they use their skills to let the agenda take place. The mixture to confuse all people in the world, is by uniting church(all religions under the catholic church), governments and spiritism. The agenda is, at the same time, a blend of non-scientific nonsense like the climate change, “pandemics”, chaos so all people willingly will accept/choose their disturbed cure. You have to make personal choices, which might compromise Your conscience – a deal with Your soul.
The UN is founded on these statements and it’s a very disturbing and dangerous path to follow:
“No human force will ever be able to destroy the United Nations, for the United Nations is not a mere building or a mere idea, it is not a man made creation. The United Nations is the vision-light of the Absolute Supreme, which is slowly, steadily, and unerringly illuminating the ignorance, the night of our human life. The divine success and supreme progress of the United Nations is bound to become a reality. At his choice hour, the Absolute Supreme will ring his own victory-bell here on Earth through the loving and serving heart of the United Nations.”
From Robert Muller’s book, My Testament to the UN.
The people behind the curtains is, without any doubt, the Roman Catholic Church, using all deceptions inside the education systems, governments, politics, and so on:
The unity of all people is the end goal and legislation/laws is planned and they will be implemented by force by the church(Catholic Church) and politicians. On September 2022 this was stated by Bishop Schneider:
“We’re not one of many religions, we’re the only one true religion, which God commanded to all people to believe,… There is no other way to salvation.”
Ask yourself who the “Absolute Supreme” is, according to Robert Muller’s book and ask yourself how the pope of the Catholic Church can be the gate to salvation, if You read in the Scriptures, that the only salvation and forgiveness is through the Son of God.
All of the insanity is based on occultism in many disguises: freemasonry, religion based on the assumption that man is a god and has the power to self salvation(pantheism), Jesuit and philosophical mindsets to the detail etc.
Be very careful out there and don’t take down your shield of sanity and use all the efforts to be on the right side, in the real battle of souls!
Whoever You might be, whatever Your thoughts might be, if You believe in God or are an atheist, make some clever statements, interpret Your life based on science or philosophy, think You are blessed with intellectual powers and great wisdom and so on – The powers behind does not care the slightest about Your lifestyle or skills, myself included. The infiltration is real on all levels in our societies, so don’t be fooled by people who wishes not to see how the madness exposes itself.
You do us all an injustice by implying our “lifestyle or skills” are somehow based on and directed against the globalists. They are not.
Whatever skill we may have in rhetoric, public speaking, writing or any other field of activity almost certainly was not developed by us solely for the purpose of attacking the “community.” We, like many (but far too few) humans, enjoy engaging in intellectual activities.
If we can use these skills to help impede the “community’s” progress, so much the better. But they are ends in themselves, these skills; not the means to some other end.
So it is less than irrelevant whether the promoters of the “community” look down or askance at what we say and do; or if they applaud us. They simply don’t count except as something rather annoying we’ve encountered and are attempting to move out of our way.
Historical Analysis of the Global Elite: Ransacking the World Economy Until ‘You’ll Own Nothing.’
By Robert J. Burrowes
Click here to read the e-Book.
excellent article by Burrows….thank you. Peace
Good luck ever being funny again.
Basically, any news item/development that does not fundamentally challenge the Covid Narrative TM you should conclude is a limited hangout. That should be the default position until proven otherwise. I don’t get why so many people in the comments section have an issue with CJ’s article.
It is not enough to challenge the covid narrative – loads of stuff challenges it one way or another, the important thing is to grasp the fundamental truth – there is no evidence of a novel virus, that is the key, fundamental truth.
Quoting myself: “any news…that does not fundamentally challenge the Covid Narrative…”
Are you replying to some other person, some straw man? Seems like if you really read my comment, I’ve got you covered. Unless you want to have a debate about what “fundamental” means.
Example of demorals is forsaking Local Town Halls and appearing on afternoon tv talk shows. Instead of later shows where the Guest or Guests are the TV program classed as entertaining. imo
Further to the subject of “controlled opposition”….
Rebel News appeared to do a good job at Davos ambushing the likes of Albert Bourla and Greta Thunberg. However Max Igan (and this is no endorsement of him) has shown that Exra Levant and Avi Yemini of Rebel News are both hardcore Zionists. The latter in particular is a former member of the IDF and praised shooting Palestinian children in the face on social media. He’s also been pictured giving “devil’s horn” signs and dressed as a woman. Rebel News have a track record of campaigning for money for legal cases that go nowhere.
The question of how they got such access to Davos and Bourla and Thunberg appears to be answered. I suspect their identities are fronts because those names have a distinct whiff of fakery. The questions they asked were actually pretty good so it appears to have been the ‘bait’ in another “bait and switch” operation.
That should read Evra, not Exra.
What did Morpheus say about the lady in red…In the matrix…..
The Woman in Red (or the Woman in the Red Dress) is a simulated character and notable feature in the Agent training program. Meant to appear harmless but to catch trainees’ attention. She is the only character in the program’s city street setting wearing a vibrant shade of red. (In contrast, other pedestrians’ attire is mostly black.)
Ah, “templates” !
Another interesting observation is,
The colour of the scarf reminds me of some very poisonous and deadly snake.
Albert means penis as in prince albert is a ring in the japs eye.
Snake would mean penis also.
Bourla is a black secret society.
Jan 13, 2023
BREAKING — Police and military have blocked the access roads to Davos, where Klaus Schwab is holding his World Economic Forum summit. People, vehicles, and fingerprints are now being checked.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1613870060912754689
Something similar took place at RFK’s assassination.
HAHA – it is actually Ezra…
Think that’s been common knowledge for a while.
Got caught in one of their scams where they went on a ‘Christian mission’ somewhere calling for donations promising a film and feedback etc of the whole shebang.
Faith Goldy was involved I remember shortly before they gave her the push and after the initial ‘arrival video’ don’t remember seeing any film or further feedback. It was not the first time it seems.
Had nothing to do with them since.
they were always a bit sensationalist=fake and Igan, whatever, called out yemeni (?) over a year ago.
This is not news, just confirmed with the “shoot them in the face and heart” vid recently.
the cunt’s a dwarf. nuff said.
And Israel is the most Covid jabbed and boosted in the world. The model bio-security state says the author of The Road to Fascism: for a Critique of the Biosecurity State, Simon Elmer.
Yes, but jabbed with what, is the question. There is evidence from the USA that side effects varied by postal code / city.
Well, we know is was the Pfizer jab in Israel. According to Dr Denis Rancourt the variations in death by jurisdiction has a 0.86:1 correlation in the US (I recall it was 0.8 something) to the percentage of poverty and vulnerable populations there and whether or not they had a “vaccine equity ” program imposed on them.
Amen. This observation holds true for the entire “Covid” PSYOP in which the media were eager participants – rather than dupes. This isn’t to suggest most of those reporting for MSM aren’t “idiots,” just to add the caveat that they are more accurately described as “corrupt idiots.”
It’s unfortunate that he focused on Covid as an example of a Psyops. The basic fact of the matter is that we had a 2000-3000 per day death rate and many more thousands made dysfunctional and unable to work or perform basic living duties while infected. The basic fact is that Covid resembles pneumonia and not the common cold in its effects and protecting the large US Population of elderly, infants and children, and those with weakened immune systems was the morally right thing to do with the Lockdowns, even if they were poorly monitored. The basic fact is that now that close to 90% of the US population has been vaccinated the Mortality Rate has decreased to a hundred a day, and this resembles rates for contagious disease vaccination that vaccination was available for, that occurred post World War II. Had he changed the direction from Covid Psyops to Capitalist-Domination Psyops the article would have been very insightful and a real winner!
Unfortunately I think I dispute every single thing you’re asserting here.
Every. Single. Thing.
What this is, though, is a perfect example of RightThink successfully overruling facts and reality. It’s fictional mantras like these that we’re being conditioned to parrot to one another through various forms of trauma-based conditioning. A2
⚡ 💯
The basic fact of the matter is that basically and factually, the factuality is so basically factual that its factually should never in fact be basically doubted. We undoubtedly and indubitably had (insert the thousands or, for more impact, millions here) deaths every second and that was dwarfed by the dysfunctionality which was caused, in no way, by pumping out lockdowns and masks and distancing and terror porn. Also undeniably and indisputably covid resembled anything the media said it resembled and to abase oneself before the sage pronouncements of such clearly superior professionals in waggle-de-comma-comma-down-dooby-do-down-down was the only moral thing to do. And now 110% of the entire global population have been vaccinated and the mortality rate has decreased to negative infinity. And, what the hell, let’s mention World War II since that’s always a great razzmatazz move. Had Hopkins changed from a Covid Psy-ops to a totally software generated piece of academic Marxism then he would have had a real winner on all Book Award ceremonies and would have guaranteed a thoroughly applauded grant-saturated career in glossy lecture halls …. until the next waffle-doo-wah-diddy-diddy.
Love it. 😂
And Big pHarmer are da Good Guys?
Read Phizer’s ‘Legal Issues’ on that very conservative site:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfizer
Trustworthy?
Like hell.
Good lord, it is 2023 and you are still sipping the kool-aid. Here’s the facts, per the CDC itself. Almost no one under life expectancy died from covid. 60+% of the people who died WITH covid had 2 comorbidities. Walensky said so herself many times on CNN, MSNBC, etc. This is not a conspiracy theory.
They counted anyone who died WITH covid, so your death toll is way off.
Locking down a society, harming kids, putting millions into poverty, enriching billionaires… all to protect a bunch of 80 year olds with pre-existing health problems? That’s not moral, it’s profoundly immoral. It’s also profoundly dysgenic. No society that harms its young to protect 80 year olds will last long.
What’s next, sacrificing them to Moloch?
Fact is that Sweden and a number of African countries did not lock down, and they didn’t make out badly at all. The Amish never locked down and they are fine.
Surely the correspondence between a masking deceit and a world – or rather mind set in self-illusion is more interesting than yet another war on -whatever?
The mind is invoked to ‘make us safe’ in terms of a masking diversionary self justifiction that operates like apples in Eden, as a mutually self-reinforcing narrative, mind or purpose.]
In this case the purpose is to protect the mask by which the conflict can be delayed, persisted in, or airbrushed into normality.
At some point Alien Disclosure will be a foreign or alienated basis of thinking that cannot know or feel the life it is is invoked to protect within the frame of the self-conflicted judgement or trauma, that invoked control within fear as a denial and diversionary dissociation.
It sort of works to keep love and light out, but requires constant sacrifice to boost its narratives, we get a bit of time in which to think some more, but all the power and responsibility has been cast from a subjected grievance onto an overwhelming Other.
What could ‘save us’ but another ‘power’ by which to excommunicate or eradicate it. Thus the archetypal battle of good v evil – relative to the ever shifting context of the different and conflicting lights in which we ‘see’.
This is not to abandon what works without a felt sense of a better way, but if fighting demands a sacrifice of integrity seen as morally justified, then we love to hate while scoring credits in fake virtue. Because the virtues and qualities of life are integral to life and not gotten or claimed over anothers death or denial.
No one in war-mind can afford (in their terms) to listen to anything that would call in to question their war set in vengeance and personal vindication as justice.
But nor can I afford to indulge a negative thought – that is a thought that undermines my awareness of integral sovereignty – of being – if I accept it as truth set over and apart from life.
yes – we can think this in every which way, and make all kinds of controversial issues to engage in, but truly positive or living thought is integrative and not born of lack or fear seeking solution. Bringing question or desire to know to a true presence, releases the problem to life that then recasts a perspective OF presence, rather than repackaging the problem as IF a solution, from the conviction the problem defines reality (that’s you and I too).
Everything of the mindset for getting works against knowing what we know, or if you prefer to obfuscate and divert from true knowledge, so it will always always always give you some thing you should or must do – such as to set hoops through which to pass to get to the fulfilment that never truly comes. Substitution for love cannot do more than invoke sacrifice to an imagery of life. (That turns to grievance of abandonment, rejection, treachery and betrayal). Here is where we came in! That is here is the original pattern that set a split mind, now revealed as a choice you do not have to accept, but for ‘old normals’ that cannot be got back – let alone the Golden Age.
The erasure of consciousness to a groupthinking bot-net under systemic control, is the victory of the intent toward unconsciousness and death as a final solution to pain.
Will such an ‘answer’ be any more fulfilling in addressing the true call or need beneath the pain? I cant speak for another, but once smitten by a truth that undoes what I thought to be, I cannot truly WANT unconsciousness or the blind eye that keeps private agenda hidden in broad sight, especially as I uncover that the cost of such a solution locks into its problem. I do not want immunity to the truth of love even if self awareness uncovers deep conflicts that call for healing, for release, for undoing.
Jack wont go back into his box, but perhaps there are those who are willing to contract such a compression to take the ride that it gives them.
There is freedom to follow the thinking that you give acceptance to, but there is not infinite capacity to abide pain no matter how ingeniously repackaged and redistributed
I walk away from Omelas, for I do not accept sacrifice as the law by which your slavery or diminishment, is my freedom or aggrandisement. Equity in being is of a different order than lack driven possession and control. “It’s Life Jim – but not as we thought to know it”
Not that this is anything new, but maybe it’s just becoming more overt.
https://summit.news/2023/02/01/news-outlets-announce-theyre-abandoning-objectivity-because-its-racist/
There is a force in the world, or a spirit, that simply doesn’t want people to be able to think.
Funny enough, Chomsky “knows exactly where that line is, and how close he can get to it, without ever actually stepping over it”. I had a great respect for him but his position on vaccine mandate reveals alot.
And his position on lockdowns before that.
Yes I do see the point being made. Of course, using an appositive quote is by no means condoning Chomsky’s actions/views, but given his lockdown/vaxx stance and how this directly relates to the subject at hand, it does no harm to emphasise this distinction. A2
He has always served as a gatekeeper for the left. He critiques the USA and ‘institutions’ without mentioning who runs those institutions. He refuses to. He covers for Israel all the time, claiming that poor little Israel is merely the puppet of the USA. Meanwhile who owns all the banks, movie studios, hedge funds, etc. Who heads up the State Department, Treasury, DHS, etc? Hint: Israeli passports.
Today (Weds) in the UK schools and universities are closed, trains aren’t running, various bureaucratic services aren’t operating….
Sounds a bit like lockdown, doesn’t it?
Local Schools Universities in the British Isles close if the facilities are ie: 13c it’s an easy number to remember 13.
Ok, outside Weather can also be a factor because we have also had outdoor curriculum.
It was true 64yrs ago when I started school at 5yrs. Although classrooms corridors could be bloody freezing, our doors sports. And getting home ie: runny nose and while walking running bicycles buses….You might turn Blue, black people just appeared to have runny nose. Which left us idiots thinking wishing for Snow flakes.
We’re terrible sorry.
Wednesday = woden days, Mercury.
Considering Mercury rules transportation and money = currency, communication then no makes perfect sense.
And no again, it doesn’t sound like a lockdown….stop that fear.
Its Imbloc, which is the 32/33 day of the year.
leaving 332 and 333 day of the year reminding.
like every year, every major ancient celebration they inverted.
Festiovak of light,
*1/31 eve to 2/2 eve: Imbolc/St. Brigid’s Day–Old Celtic/Irish feast of Goddess Brigid; merged with the Christian feast of St. Brigid. Fires were lit to welcome Her as She traveled about blessing fields, animals, and people.
1/31 eve to 2/3 eve: Mid-Winter/Groundhog’s Day/Candlemas–Festival marking the transformation from death to life – the beginning of the agricultural year, awakening of hibernating animals, and return of migrating birds and fish. Observed with a candlelight procession to bless fields and seeds, recognition of newborns, and contemplation of life.
%3Fw%3D640&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=8370406f4293b9b220d63bf3673fe3801c1aa090472effd16a3fc11353272289&ipo=images
So it’s about ancient occultism/pantheism/worship of the creation – that God is present in everything?
fertility.
good post, it is Imbolc and Bride is my Saint, a real woman, thank the Creator.
But, they are all lockdowns, mini-me versions, all reducing our freedoms, so that public sector scum get more holidays, sorry illnesses, and the world stalls into disrepair.
all part of the plan.
I don’t think satanists give a fuck about Imbolc, unless they can turn it into something -ve.
The world awakes, is Imbolc, the world arises is Bealtain (Easter).
let it happen with drastic significance this year.
Yes indeed. The unions are yet more heads of the hydra and the unvarying sentiments I hear about how those teachers are behaving like selfish spoiled brats creaming off their undeserved thousands whilst lapping up all those holidays etc. is a predictable response much desired by the overlords. Expect more “industrial action” which will only sink the whole ship faster and faster alongside the provocation to tear more and more fissures in the social fabric and have the masses biting at each other’s’ throats.
Problem
A false flag been done to the comment voting system.
Reaction The voting system is manipulate by voting vpn terrorists who hate our way of life and freedom of comment voting and people (mainly woke alt right types) where scared of coming to the site and need protection from dangerous gamifacation of reading comments that had downvotes.
Solution.. Close the comment voting system down to keep everyone safe.
I happen to believe the comment voting system should be closed down – not to keep everyone safe but to keep this forum on an adult level.
Voting is childish. It’s stupid playground stuff. “Oh I hate you! You didn’t say what I wanted to hear so I’m going to downvote you!”
Disclaimer: yeah, I get a lot of downvotes.
flawed, yes…
fair ? yes.
a real slap in the chops is worse than a red thumb(digitally).
i am not going to be “a son of the cliff” when others say things for me, sometimes more eloquently. That’s waht a greenie is for; or for appreciating some humour/nuance or a turn of phrase…
red thumbs on here have generally been kept for utter pish talk, vicious ad hominem, lies, persistent trolls or absurdities.
PvH has taken a world record on the chin, hats off to him. If you cannae take a red slap, go away.
OG keep the voting, …you maybe have to be more active in rooting out scumfucks, but the voting saves me repeating others good words, or sounding like a twat in parliament here hear.
fuck the trolls and eejits, keep the thumbs.
you get a thumbs up Howard, for your understandable opinion.
What bothers me even more than the silliness of the voting is the frustration of wishing to know why the downvotes: what is the thinking behind them?
Does the downvoter have information that would enlighten the commenter? If so, then they ought to share it. Don’t keep it to themselves. Isn’t that the great value of a public forum?
🤡
😂
maybe.
““controlled opposition” or anything paranoid (and silly) like that. The most effective PSYOPs don’t work that way. Journalists like Fang don’t have to be told what they are allowed and not allowed to report on.”
Yes – because castles were constructed with one line of defense and that’s how the robber barons got where they are today. I don’t think so.
This idea of a line of respectability works for mainstream journalists like a Marr or a Hersh. They can never say “well, they did Mockingbird, MK Ultra, Cointelpro, Northwoods and Gladio so what else might they do?”. However it doesn’t work in the age of alt-media. People can now cross the line and make a reasonable living. It’s also been obvious for many decades that there was always going to be an audience who became terminally disillusioned about the MSM and couldn’t be herded back on to that reservation by any means. Ultimately, I wouldn’t rule out that there’s a plan to destroy media as we’ve known it – newspapers, TV, cinema and music are all shrinking. The immersive, supposedly interactive fake world looks to me where this is meant to head.
If there’s no such thing as “controlled opposition”, consider the behaviour of Peter Hitchens and Piers Corbyn during convid. Both were held up as oppositional heroes. Hitchens then turned round and said he’d had the vax and so will you. That looks like a demoralisation op to me, one that conceded the expendable part of the op (lockdown) while upholding its greater part (the vax). Corbyn led an “attack” on a shopping center during one lockdown protest and called for arson attacks. That looks like an op to discredit the protests to me. There are further lessons from history – for example, Gloria Steinem was once held up as an oppositional figure until she was exposed by the Redstockings as CIA-backed and then they themselves turned out to be CIA. Sowing confusion to breed demoralisation and giving up goes back to Tavistock’s ‘Future Shocks’ if not further.
No doubt it’s annoying for alt-journalists to be called “controlled opposition” as I’m sure they all eventually are. No doubt bots and agents have been set up to do just that. However what’s the alternative – for everything from a non-mainstream outlet to be automatically trusted? Doesn’t that look suspiciously like an alt-mirror of the Trusted Media Initiative? For better or worse, “controlled opposition” is part of this world and everyone who wants to swim in it has to find a way of coping. Disillusionment with an alt-hero is like an initiation that most go through (in my case, it was with Ed Opperman back in 2016). The choices aren’t go mad or give up – there’s the option of wisening up. The sheer lengths they go to in their attempts at deception are a cause for hope because it shows they are alarmed about our potential.
“It seems to me a demoralization operation, the one that granted the expendable part of the operation (lockdown) while supporting most of it (the vax).”
Correct!
Love this comment. Thanks 👍👍
Good observation.
I posted about Neil Oliver and Mark Steyn being seriously onside and got ripped to bits.
Just saying.
I was the first on US rt to ask what’s happening in Australia in comments. And Meds you can purchase over the counter in Chemists for a few quid having travelled.
You people, safe cronies are the bottom of the barrel of self centered autocracts. Black Sheep.
“Controlled Opposition” is a redundancy. The likes of those Mr. Hopkins mentions (Fang, Chomsky etc) do not need to be “controlled.” They are already willing participants in the thing we call “psyop.” Which of course is his point.
A mother who changes her baby’s diaper anyway doesn’t have to be coerced into doing so. And that’s what the Chomsky’s of this world do: they change the cabal’s linens when they get soiled. They’re only too happy to do it – their reward brings a smile to their faces.
How many etymologists get to be household names? Just a couple. Changing dirty psyops is its own reward.
All the names in both the media’s have Anagrams, Sexual Innuendos. Slangs references to them.
“Controlled opposition” is not IMO a useful concept to our understanding of reality because, at one time or another, we all can be labelled with it when knowingly or not, willingly or not, our action happens to agree with the interests of the status quo, or simply appears to do so in the eye of the labeller.
I don’t think anyone can claim all their actions were in opposition to the status quo – unless they live outside the civilised world – for the simple reason that we all use the system and therefore participate one way or another, at one time or another, in its functioning.
Peter Hitchens, I’d fogotten about him! Then there was “the crew” David, Piers and that nutty woman talking bollocks in Trafalgar Square. Acting like the crazy fools they were being made out to be. Demoralising is an understatement. I spent most of the last three years putting up stickers and attempting to live as normal a life as possible( difficile in France, for a while there I was banned from literally everywhere).. Futile maybe but I’m not demoralised nor depressed and don’t seem to have gone mad, as yet, Thanks for the comment!
Nothing speaks revolution than asking permission to demonstration and being told where to go by the authority’s then standing in a square like a condemn prisoner waving freedom placards.
Masonic.
Correct. Defense in depth is a basic security strategy. Intelligence agencies would not fail to employ it.
There are many ways to tell a Lie. One method is to keep as close to the truth as possible.
Just changing one thing while surrounding it with the rest of what you already accept as the truth. So we have the NOVEL Coronavirus.
What are we told is the existing truth. There is a thing called Coronavirus and it makes us sick and if you are old and or vulnerable it may kill you. This thing called the Coronavirus changes each year so it keeps making us sick.
Some years This thing called the Coronavirus changes more and sometimes it changes less each year. When it changes more it makes us more sick. Then comes the trick ,
Now they tell us This new thing called the NOVEL Coronavirus has changed a lot is going to make us even more sick and if you are old and or vulnerable it will kill you.
Everything else follows in an anti logical way from this Lie.
With the help along the way with more lies. Like the definition of a pandemic.
Asymptomatic spread , A case just needs a test not symptoms. A new way attributing deaths.
Definition of NOVEL
“a fictitious prose narrative of book length, typically representing character and action with some degree of realism.”
If you read the symptoms age doesn’t matter, the old thing was jan’20 and yes old are more vulnerable if you think in generational blocks, what’s that say about the human animal.
If there was a conspiracy to promote licentiousness among the people who then acted on what they would have done anyway…there is still a conspiracy.
That group are known and it’s not a matter of needing to reveal their conspiracy but their identity.Conspiracy to harm etc is simply part of their nature.
That defines what newspapers had to announce as conspiracy shortly after the beginning of the 20th Century. That’s with People starting to read the National news print mentioned in editorials.
CJ is quite right in stressing that Hamilton 68 was not a scam and that journalists did not “fall for” it.
Journalists have been quite specifically trained as Pavlovian dogs – that is the purpose of journalism school which, until the mid-19th century, had never existed nor hindered the rise of pamphleteers, satirists or those who skewered the powerful.
Ask Aristophanes.
Correction: Mid-20th century – boy, do I feel old!
Yea Popeye, your forgetting mid 18 hundreds you couldn’t even read British languages plonker, how was the vermouth Gollywog.
you show your colours there.
“Eventually, even obsessive ‘conspiracy theorists’ like me will tire of writing about it.”
Hold on, we can get there.
https://moneycircus.substack.com/p/bbc-flirts-with-deeper-authority
https://moneycircus.substack.com/p/chronicle-of-dissent-rant-in-age
As time goes by I’m spending less and less time visiting off-g. You guys were a life line to me in the early days of all of this but the articles being published lately are having more and more of a demoralising effect on me.
Lines like the covid psy-op will never be exposed *ever* being drummed into your head repeatedly can do that to you.
I’m not advocating burying your head in the sand when it comes to looking at the reality of the situation but I also believe hope is a powerful thing and feeling demoralised and hopeless is exactly how they would like us to feel. It is a weapon they have deployed against us often.
Please mods don’t take this personally I’m just asking for you to consider publishing some more positive and hopeful messages. For some of us our mental health is in the toilet after these 3 years and at this point I’m having to stay away from off-g for the sake of my mental health.
There is essentially ZERO positive stuff anywhere, far and wide, including alternative media. At best, they analyze, more or less accurately, the stuff that’s going on. OffG would be one of those.
There are outlets more inclined to offer a glimpse into the future, for instance https://www.7jourssurterre.com/productions.
I also like this guy https://odysee.com/@AKINA:7
If you want something truly positive, check out Michael Tellinger https://t.me/ubuntuplanet
The world has been rocked to sleep by a fukuyamesque illusion of the end of history, and there is no widespread alternative concept to the concept of democracy, which has been utterly corrupted and inverted without anybody noticing because they’ve been too busy consuming whatever shit was shoveled down their throats.
People will first have to realize this and come up with either a way of rebuilding democracy or coming up with a viable alternative. We’re nowhere near the beginning of the realization phase yet, unfortunately.
Anyway, to end on a positive note: worry not, your grandkids will find a way to kick the shit out of the technocratic pricks.
PS: Speaking about technocracy, this guy Patrick Wood (http://technocracy.studio/e/international-interview-with-elze-van-hamelen/) is not only very knowledgeable, but also radiates a positive vibe.
Thank you, I appreciate you taking the time to suggest these to me. I will check them out.
Was a bit worried about coming off as a special snowflake with my comment. I’m just aware of a lot of people (other than me) in my life who are starting to completely despair about the state of things. I find myself trying to give them hope that all is not lost while not actually believing what I’m saying to them 😅
Well, buddy, they say that when things get tough, the tough get going, and that’s precisely what people have to do.
Check out the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson, a great guy. Very knowledgeable, supremely eloquent, fearless. Totally positive.
It’s not whether it’s all lost. The world is transitioning to another era, something that’s inevitable. What’s important is to understand what system today’s revolutionaries (the motherfuckers in charge) want to put in place and mount formidable opposition, introduce our alternative, so on.
The old world ain’t coming back and, given how corrupted and perverted it’s been, good riddance.
Peterson is a train wreck. Read Vox Day’s book on him, and note that he is now going around crying and shilling for Netanyahu.
Rebuilding means aiming for less destruction, exploitation, consumption, convenience and hedonism. That’s the problem, right there.
In the film The Island, the fight between the two Ewan McGregors and Sean Bean ends with their underground silo blowing its’ lid and the inhabitants are then pictured for the first time in the open air after climbing out of its’ ruins. Yes, they looke enthralled (as enthralled as a clone can be) but the word “freedom” wouldn’t be appropriate- none of them believed Lincoln Six-Echo sufficiently to feel like anything had been accomplished. That’s how i envision “exposure” of the hoax. The role of the likes of O-G is as much to keep its’ readers grounded in sensibility while the world around them goes full-mongo, as it is lifting other lids as you go. Simple dissection of MSM content really should be easy enough anyway if you are aware of the existence of other platforms altogether.
Thank you for sharing this with us and I’ll pass this on.
I also wanted to say we have a Covid Positive section full of pieces with a more hopeful spin on things. 136 pieces in there currently. We also have our weekly(ish) tradition, Monday Morning Memes, inviting, at the very least we hope, a wry smile or even a grim chuckle.
One thing I’ve been attempting to do is encourage more kindness int the comments section here. It’s hard to know what is real any more, everything becomes a surreal dreamscape made almost entirely of shit. But kindness, compassion, an appreciation of beauty and innocence, curiosity, hope, these things can be an important compass in this dark hall of mirrors we’re in!
A2
A dreamscape made almost entirely of shit feels pretty accurate! 😅
Thank you for your suggestion and your kind response, I do already quite enjoy your meme Mondays. I saw some people (at least initially) were not big fans of it but I’ve had more success planting seeds in people’s minds (especially millenial/gen z ages) with memes pointing out how ludicrous all the covid rules were than anything else. Humour and ridicule are pretty good weapons against totalitarianism in my humble opinion.
There is a tendency within the alt-media community to shy away from art; and to place all its emphasis on the truly dystopian world the “ruling class” seems intent on foisting on the rest of us.
This is a monumental mistake. Art – genuine art – no matter how dark the themes and presentation, cannot help but enlighten, inspire and even uplift the human “spirit.” Contained with works of art is the realization that something different is possible and perhaps even achievable.
It’s no accident that the first victim of any totalitarian society is always art – to be replaced by “schlock.” The very fact that one of the “Avengers” movies became the all-time biggest moneymaker paints a very negative picture of what passes for art in today’s world. The Avengers might seem like a very positive movie, but it presupposes super heroes to succeed in vanquishing the enemy.
Sorry to ramble. The bottom line is, the alt-media needs to broaden its approach.
You are absolutely right, insofar as you refer to true art. By definition, art is the precursor of science, technology, societal development. Art is synonymous with original creation. Apart from flawless execution, a work of art offers a new approach, an excursion into an uncharted territory. Art shouldn’t be confused with entertainment, which doesn’t do any of that, and which is generally understood to be art today.
In fact, art – pure creativity – is the only think that can save humanity, considering the advent of artificial intelligence that has all the hitherto accumulated knowledge up its fucking sleeve and is able to use it in a way no human can dream of. Artificial intelligence probably can create novel stuff based on predictions or algorithms derived from past human activity, but whatever the robots come up with will NOT be in the human realm.
Two scenarios are possible in the future. Either people will succumb to AI and become inconsequential pieces of collective humanoid matter, at best contributing little bits to Big Bro. Or they’ll realize their humanness, manage to use AI as a tool, and develop the inherently “human” qualities, like unpredictability and true creativity.
My guess is that this is what people should be concerned with the most – figuring out what how they’ll measure up against the fucking machines, what their humanness is, how they can put it to work to prevail in the future.
The birds are singing and enjoying the bread I put out for them. The sun is shining. The children are playing in the street. I cannot see or hear anything hopeless, except things I choose to read or watch.
If these graphs don’t wake up people, nothing will.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/seeing-believing-what-data-reveal-about-deaths-following-covid-vaccine-rollouts-around-world/5804242
Rigid thinking (Covidians) and neuroplasticity
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/neuroplasticity
Easy as falling off your bike.
Or is it?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MFzDaBzBlL0
An explanation of ‘tunnel’ thinking.
Project Veritas rented an LED truck and parked it outside of @pfizer
world headquarters in Manhattan today
Good for business and the brand?
https://twitter.com/project_veritas/status/1620447276832559104?s=46&t=xXBqha3EwNcDO_9kT_AMXg
Yes, it’s certainly looking more and more like a classic limited hangout psyop as CJ suggests. A2
The video shows Fyza making a virus the profiting from the made virus.
So you are saying this is going to make people want to take the jab and accept lock downs?
What it shows me is if Fyza or big Pharma were not around we wouldn’t have covid.
Ultimately, I agree with you. Though for different reasons. A2
Its really a misdirection, not a classic limited hangout. There is no SARS-Cov2 virus and hence, no “Covid”. This video only reinforces the lie. What truth is exactly being hung-out here?
Well I take that point. The point being that this ‘leaked’ video is encouraging outrage and internal squabbling while ultimately merely reasserting the virus fear narrative. A2
Pfizer makes stuff that they want to put inside of you, for your “health,” whether you want it or need it, and for their profit. It’s their raison d’etre.
Viruses, whether they exist or not, whether they cause disease or don’t, are not necessary for Pfizer’s (Big Pharma’s) purposes.
If there were no such thing as viruses, it would be necessary to invent them, and even if virology is proven false, Pfizer et al would simply find another justification to hang the need for its products on.
a good ol canajun song
Canadian Convoy Rally Song [OFFICIAL VIDEO] – YouTube
if I can forget about all those dead and severely injured people!
if I can forget about all those dead and dying people, and all those severely injured people and their ongoing suffering!
First off: Chomsky has condemned the ‘unvaccinated’ as well. Him talking about ‘manufacturing consent’. The Irony. Secondly, I don’t think they (the powers that be) have an equal chance of getting away with it this time, because their sordid actions have become so blatantly obvious to a lot more people. It goes way beyond 9/11, way beyond the invasion of Iraq, I think. Because this is no longer ‘local’. I am (for instance) from The Netherlands. Same here. Same over there. And there. And there. So very visible. Extremely visible to those who want to see. I’d say.
What proportion of Dutch population are Covid19 vaccine skeptics? I would like to know because I have lived there and was wondering whether their thinking is one of conforming to authorities or not.
Skeptics? I would like to say: dissidents. People who reject the goals of The Reset outright. Hard to say how many of those reside in my country. I’m observing that some farmers here are aware of Agenda 2030 (and so on). There are many alternative news channels, furthermore. There have been loads of protests as well.
But up till now – my observation – the majority of the Dutch people are still vast asleep. Still under the spell of all things ‘corona’ (as it’s called here). Amazing how these people manage to hold on to that firm belief. Even when the Holy Jabs obviously don’t work as was promised, they don’t perceive what’s really going on or won’t admit they’re being fucked over. Many people here act as though the so-called pandemic is over so that they can resume their lives like before, in spite of super-inflation.
But… excess mortality is starting to become a big theme here as well – via the established media. Recently the presenter of a very popular sports tv-program asked some very serious questions regarding the possible cause. ‘How about the jabs. Shouldn’t we look into that?’ The Dutch authorities are (supposedly) hesitant to do so and the media are trying to blame the flu or covid. Or whatever (you know the drill).
So in short, things are really no better here and it’s a long way to go. But I do think a major shift is imminent. Unavoidable.
Correction, pardon my English: FAST asleep. Second language, yes?
The so called PSYOP that we have all been subjected to for going on the last three years was implemented by the BBC’s Trusted News Initiative (TNI). A Global version of the BBC’s “Ministry of Truth”. The BBC’s shadowy global censorship & propaganda network with a mandate to identify non-authorised news stories for suppression, and to show approved versions of events.
In July 2019, the UK and Canadian governments hosted the Foreign & Commonwealth Office Global Conference on Media Freedom, where then BBC Director-General Tony Hall announced: “Last month I convened, behind closed doors, a Trusted News Summit at the BBC, which brought together global tech platforms and publishers. The goal was to arrive at a practical set of actions we can take together, right now, to tackle the rise of misinformation and bias….I’m determined that we use that unique reach and trusted voice to lead the way – to create a global alliance for integrity in news”. The Conference website states that “It is supported by Luminate, which in turn was founded by the Omidyar Group.
A global media-wide Early Warning System is lead by the BBC and includes Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft, Reuters, The Associated Press, The Washington Post, etc. So that the PSYOP makes everything you read, see and hear in the mainstream media “Trustworthy & True” and authorised by the Trusted News Initiative.
The Twitter Files could expose the PSYOP if they detail Twitters links with the “Trusted News Initiative”
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced that he and several other plaintiffs filed a groundbreaking novel lawsuit making antitrust and constitutional claims against the Trusted News Initiative PSYOP: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/TNI-Complaint-1.10.22.pdf
“Rapid Response Mechanism” coordinates the stances of selected governments. “Trusted News Initiative” coordinates selected major propaganda enterprises. “Fact Checking Network” coordinates the supposedly private “fact-checkers” globally.
Hows the other court cases panning out.??
exactly…
RFK will do, what the others have done.
nothing.
But the hopium energy and dramas of the court case will keep him relevant for another few years $£.
I would suggest that RFK Jr. is well-healed in suing large corporations, and quite successfully. Years before the current nightmare.
Children’s Health Defense is doing yeoman’s work on many fronts.
He may be too plugged into the establishment and take too much of the pandemic fear narrative at face value to make much of a difference though, imo. A2
Hello Paul Cottingham: Yes. The CHD lawsuit is a groundbreaking lawsuit, as it is based on corporate antitrust and racketeering charges. Though not clearly stated in the suit, the Trusted News Initiative is a plainly racketeering operation.
I would seem most OffGuardian readers don’t give a damn about Laws, Constitutions, nor any forms of civilian control of governmental agency. It is difficult to take ANY of their complaints seriously…
I think you’re making very uncharitable assumptions here.
It can be difficult to get behind lawsuits brought by organisations happy to concede certain parts of the Covid narrative that you don’t agree with yourself.
eg. Reiner fuellmich spending so much time on patented cleavage sites, which had the net benefit of serving the virus fear agenda, and which led many to suspect he might be a controlled actor. Whether or not he was, his various lawsuits conceded too much to be of much real benefit.
When it comes to CHD it’s not as straightforward as you make out. Their stance is quite conservative and leaves too much official Covid propaganda unchallenged for some people’s tastes. A2
Two points. 1.) I never took Reiner Fuellmich seriously, as he was play acting as an attorney in an imaginary court case. His efforts were largely theatrical. I took one look at his partner (Viviane Fischer) and knew he possessed no functional intuition whatsoever…
2.) Robert Kennedy Jr is quite conservative, indeed. That’s how he wins court cases. (At least, sometimes…) That said: I don’t think this latest effort by Children’s Health Defense has the chance of a snowball in Hell. The world is run by corporate racketeering and financial extortion. Portfolio managers are the only ones who ever win…
RFK is not conservative, he is actively spreading misinformation on viruses, and suppressing/attacking people who do their best to spread the truth: viruses don’t exist.
See https://odysee.com/@dharmabear:2/Eric-Coppolino-Christine-Massey-Michael-Bryant-Jan-2023:a for some of his wrongdoings.
Hello Leo Brybor: The reason “they” have not isolated these alleged viruses, is that isolation of viruses is not possible. Viruses exist within a matrix of molecular conditions. The best that can be done is to create viral models utilizing autoimmune responses via chemical and electrical signaling within the affected matrix.
The people spreading misinformation are those that refuse to understand the levels of investigation and repeated experiment, performed by tens of thousands of laboratory technicians over the course of the last 100 years.
The politically obfuscated situation, is that there are multiple bio-warfare programs running these experiments in hundreds of laboratories – every day of the week… The assholes doing this need to be stopped…
Oh good lord, you fanatics need to have someone agree with you 100% or you aren’t happy.
Kennedy has been suing large corporations for years. He is leading the fight against the vaccine pushers. Whether you think viruses exist or not, vaccines certainly do. They pump kids full of dangerous chemicals.
People like you should just hang out in the woods on your own so you don’t encounter someone with a different opinion. Crazy people.
Downvote:
Something you do
That upsets your world view.
Revenge with a tiny tap.
Something you do
To say “Screw you!”
Because you’re drowning in crap.
downvoted you. 😀
Offended by a thumb?
Don’t be quite so glum
Go and tell your mum
Or shove it up your bum.
DownvoteL
Something you do
When you’ve stepped in shit
And must clean off your shoe.
It’s all so tiresome
I think that’s the idea.
We’re all getting tired with the crap we’ve had to put up with for the last three years.
To keep me going I like to use every little step they take to stoke my anger.
Here’s the one I’m using today:
https://www.civilservicejobs.service.gov.uk/csr/jobs.cgi?jcode=1835241
Stay angry,
The supposed woman who wrote that Atlantic article about a convid “amnesty” just happened to be an anagram of “tiresomely”.
BTW what’s Monbiot’s line this morning but “we must all embrace meat substitutes”.
Re below: it’s like a dictatorial people telling me what is my name – no less -people had to change IDs and so forth. EVERYONE in Ukraine from 2 years up required biometric ID from the same time frame. I think this is the truth – but I am willing to be shouted down.
I don’t know about the rest of EU but France’s ID card (Compulsory) has been biometric since 2021
Each iteration of such a card “for better security” is money for a crony, like most things in government.
CJ Hopkins – usually I am on board with your observations. But with the evidence I have, the MSM are not just curtailed in this way. Although they are as well. Certain media that I used to trust have changed and propaganda seeps out. It feels different – it feels paid for. What I don’t know is if it always was as completely as now, or if there has been a massive shift. I believe the latter – again on evidence.
Like they say, ‘Make 1984 history again’.
If the BBC doesn’t report on protests outside its own premises – well – draw a conclusion. Something has changed – we all know and feel it – people here and people everywhere.
The filth at the BBC know which side their bread is buttered on. Do not give them any money.
give them hell!!!
Comment directed to Admin (Sam or whoever is there) — This idea of people being able to up or down vote multiple times on the same comment is quite problematic. I am no fan of one of the regular commenters (Martin Usher) — not at all — but the massive number of down votes one of his comments received here for this article suggests to me that a few people have “caught on” to multiple voting and will grossly misuse it. His comments, however wrong I think they are, are usually intelligently written and deserve intelligent criticism, not just repeated thumbs down! Can something be done to limit the potential for silly misuse of the up and down vote system?
And please everyone don’t attack me for saying this.
People have discovered that you can vote multiple times indefinitely …
It’s a recent bug. It used to be if you tapped the same vote twice you would get an error message telling you that you had already voted.
It certainly must be a software bug.
The counts for your comment showed as 0 thumbs up and 0 thumbs down.
I selected Thumbs Up and the count showed 1 and the Thumbs Down count increased to -49
Hope this helps Off-G’s tech. folks debug this newly-arisen problem.
I am looking into it and thanks for your message. A2
What type of response did you think you was going to get..? flowers, love hearts ?
jesus
mjh would you suggest something like what some of the other woke alt right commentators on the site suggested./ like a voting amnesty or safe space to comment or read articles. ??
Maybe we should create a app to block the votes for the sensitive woke Right types.??
Once a upon time OFFG even thought we needed protection from dangerous downvoting this was during the vaccine passport period.
How about growing some balls you panzy and head to the other guardian if your scare of downvotes and need government over reach from scary downvotes.
woke alt right.
If one just does a simple search on Wikipedia (legal issues), Phizer’s litany of evil is there for all to see.
Or, to put it in their own words (from the Phizer website):
‘There are so many losers. They’re everywhere. Doubt, fear, sorrow. They lose.” This is what happens when science wins’
Or:
‘We’re in relentless pursuit of scientific breakthroughs and revolutionary medicines that will create a healthier world for everyone.’
Losers ?
Relentless?
Where’s the nearest bucket ?
Thanks CJ for your insights and courage. I always look forward to reading your articles and books. Peace.
Meanwhile in the Real World, Scott Ritter (upright Chief Weapons Inspector who was dismissed by the UN for exposing Anglo-Zionazi-Capitalist Psy-Op Con-WMD) has resisted being pushed down the memory hole. On today’s Duran website, white knight Ritter slays AZC Psyop Con-Z: contrary to our fairy stories from mass media, Ukraine has already been substantially de-Militarized; thus achieving the one half of Russia’s twin objectives. Scott speculates how Russia will achieve her remaining objective, to de-Nazify Ukraine: he thinks Russia will do it by applying economic pressure on Western Ukraine after Russia has regained Odessa, rather than by Russia having to kill yet another 350,000 Ukrainian soldiers (plus 35,000 Russian soldiers}. Either way, NATZO’s puppet Z-regime of Ukro-nazis led by Zio-nazis will have to go: lock, stock and gun-barrel.
https://www.youtube.com/live/fBGe4US7XFs?feature=share
Like CJ Hopkins, the writer of this present OffG thread, Scott Ritter grieves for so many needlessly dead and injured. He says:
“They [the AZC] sabotaged the two Minsk agreements and the Ankara agreement. We [the people] would go on our knees to get such agreements now”.
N’en deplaise a ces fous nommes sages de Grece; #OffGuardian #ConsentFactory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4wdbibV3IM
Who believes silly Propaganda. And Why belief is not the point.
consentfactory 2017/01/13/ why-ridiculous-official-propaganda-still-works/
Chief among the common misconceptions about the way official propaganda works is the notion that its goal is to deceive the public into believing things that are not “the truth” (that Trump is a Russian agent, for example, or that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, or that the terrorists hate us for our freedom, et cetera). However, while official propagandists are definitely pleased if anyone actually believes whatever lies they are selling, deception is not their primary aim.
The primary aim of official propaganda is to generate an “official narrative” that can be mindlessly repeated by the ruling classes and those who support and identify with them. This official narrative does not have to make sense, or to stand up to any sort of serious scrutiny. Its factualness is not the point. The point is to draw a Maginot line, a defensive ideological boundary, between “the truth” as defined by the ruling classes and any other “truth” that contradicts their narrative.
N’en deplaise a ces fous nommes sages de Grece;
En ce monde il n’est point de parfaite sagesse;
Tous les hommes sont fous, et malgre tous leurs soins,
Ne different entre eux que du plus ou du moins.
Satires (1716)BOILEAU.
Do not displease these foolish men of Greece;
In this world there is no perfect wisdom;
All men are mad, and in spite of all their care,
Different between them only more or less.
“The primary aim of official propaganda is to generate an “official narrative” that can be mindlessly repeated by the ruling classes and those who support and identify with them. This official narrative does not have to make sense, or to stand up to any sort of serious scrutiny. Its factualness is not the point. The point is to draw a Maginot line, a defensive ideological boundary, between “the truth” as defined by the ruling classes and any other “truth” that contradicts their narrative.”
All that plus a great quote from Boileau. Thanks! Now I know why I smelt a strong whiff of Nazi after they opened Con-19: it was the way “they” began to draw a Siegfried Line, an ideological boundary around the truth as defined by Authority”. Been there, seen that, stayed till the end:
‘We’re Gonna Hang Out Our Washing On The Siegfried Line’ 1939https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mN8wZB8ae8
What is the meaning of the “Hamilton 68” moniker? “Hamilton” I imagine is an attempt to cash in on how Alexander Hamilton became fashionable, as a result of things like the Broadway musical. They don’t like populism, so the will likely use Wall Street founder Hamilton as opposed to populist Jefferson. But what does “68” mean?
https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/hamilton-68-a-new-tool-to-track-russian-disinformation-on-twitter/
Means you’ve no idea dummy.
Hamilton is the central bankers’ lover boy – which may be why they erected his… … … memory in a musical just prior to Covid. His Federalist Paper No 68 promoted the electoral college, retaining control in the bankers’ hands.
The Quandt family worship him, the centrailized fiat privateers, and in that connection right there you should see whom his memory serves.
https://moneycircus.substack.com/p/bankers-prance-to-war-part-2
Great stuff, except that there will likely not be anything less depressing than the virus scam and the Reset on the horizon for a writer to focus on in the future.