The Right to Not Be Lied To: Making the Case for Truth in Politics
John & Nisha Whitehead
“In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true… The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.”
Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism
Q: “How can you tell if a politician is lying?”
A: “His lips are moving.”
The First Amendment assures us of a right to free speech.
It does not, unfortunately, explicitly assure us of a right to not be lied to by our government and its various officials. Any hope of holding government officials accountable for their lies rests with the political process, in the voting booths and through the impeachment process, which themselves have become so ineffective as to offer little real hope of transparency, accountability or reform.
We have been lied to so much, for so long, and on every subject, by government officials of every stripe that political lies have become our norm. It says something about the sorry state of our nation and the low bar we have set for those we elect to represent us.
However, although there are few consequences for government officials who lie to the public, the Deep State continues to wage war on those who challenge its lies, half-truths and obfuscations.
Case in point: Julian Assange.
Although the news of Assange’s plea deal was quickly overshadowed by the drama that is the 2024 presidential election (the WikiLeaks founder pled guilty to a “single felony count of illegally obtaining and disclosing national security material in exchange for his release from a British prison”), his persecution at the hands of the Deep State was a warning shot over the bow for anyone who dares speak truth to power.
The Deep State has embarked on a ruthless, take-no-prisoners, all-out assault on truth-tellers.
Activists, journalists and whistleblowers alike continue to be terrorized, traumatized, tortured and subjected to the fear-inducing, mind-altering, soul-destroying, smash-your-face-in tactics employed by the superpowers-that-be.
In an age of prosecutions for thought crimes, pre-crime deterrence programs, and government agencies that operate like organized crime syndicates, this is a new kind of tyranny being imposed on those who dare to expose the crimes of the Deep State, whose reach has gone global.
What happened to Assange was intended to send a message to anyone who dares to speak truth to power: don’t even consider it.
Some background: Assange, the founder of a website that published secret information, news leaks, and classified media from anonymous sources, was arrested on April 11, 2019, on charges of helping U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning access and leak more than 700,000 classified military documents that portray the U.S. government and its military as reckless, irresponsible and responsible for thousands of civilian deaths.
Included among the leaked Manning material were the Collateral Murder video (April 2010), the Afghanistan war logs (July 2010), the Iraq war logs (October 2010), a quarter of a million diplomatic cables (November 2010), and the Guantánamo files (April 2011).
The Collateral Murder leak included gunsight video footage from two U.S. AH-64 Apache helicopters engaged in a series of air-to-ground attacks while air crew laughed at some of the casualties. Among the casualties were two Reuters correspondents who were gunned down after their cameras were mistaken for weapons and a driver who stopped to help one of the journalists. The driver’s two children, who happened to be in the van at the time it was fired upon by U.S. forces, suffered serious injuries.
This is morally wrong.
It shouldn’t matter which nation is responsible for these atrocities: there is no defense for such evil perpetrated in the name of profit margins and war profiteering.
In true Orwellian fashion, however, the government would have us believe that it is Assange and Manning who are the real criminals for daring to expose the war machine’s seedy underbelly.
Following his April 2019 arrest, Assange was locked up in a maximum-security British prison—in solitary confinement for up to 23 hours a day—pending extradition to the U.S.
Had he not taken the plea deal, he could have been sentenced to 175 years in prison.
“In 20 years of work with victims of war, violence and political persecution I have never seen a group of democratic States ganging up to deliberately isolate, demonise and abuse a single individual for such a long time and with so little regard for human dignity and the rule of law,” declared Nils Melzer, the UN special rapporteur on torture.
It’s not just Assange who was made to suffer, however.
Manning, who was jailed for seven years from 2010 to 2017 for leaking classified documents to Wikileaks, was arrested in March 2019 for refusing to testify before a grand jury about Assange, placed in solitary confinement for almost a month, and then sentenced to remain in jail either until she agreed to testify or until the grand jury’s 18-month term expired.
Federal judge Anthony J. Trenga of the Eastern District of Virginia also fined Manning $500 for every day she remained in custody after 30 days, and $1,000 for every day she remained in custody after 60 days, a chilling—and financially crippling—example of the government’s heavy-handed efforts to weaponize fines and jail terms as a means of forcing dissidents to fall in line.
This is how the police state deals with those who challenge its chokehold on power.
Make no mistake: the government is waging war on journalists and whistleblowers for disclosing information relating to government misconduct that is within the public’s right to know.
Yet while this targeted campaign—aided, abetted and advanced by the Deep State’s international alliances—unfolded during President Trump’s watch, it began with the Obama Administration’s decision to revive the antiquated, hundred-year-old Espionage Act, which was intended to punish government spies, and instead use it to prosecute government whistleblowers.
Unfortunately, the Trump Administration not only continued the Obama Administration’s attack on whistleblowers. It injected this war on truth-tellers and truth-seekers with steroids and let it loose on the First Amendment.
In May 2019, Trump’s Justice Department issued a sweeping new “superseding” secret indictment of Assange—hinged on the Espionage Act—that empowered the government to determine what counts as legitimate journalism and criminalize the rest, not to mention giving “the government license to criminally punish journalists it does not like, based on antipathy, vague standards, and subjective judgments.”
Noting that the indictment signaled grave dangers for freedom of the press in general, media lawyer Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., warned, “The indictment would criminalize the encouragement of leaks of newsworthy classified information, criminalize the acceptance of such information, and criminalize publication of it.”
Boutrous continues:
“[I]t doesn’t matter whether you think Assange is a journalist, or whether WikiLeaks is a news organization. The theory that animates the indictment targets the very essence of journalistic activity: the gathering and dissemination of information that the government wants to keep secret. You don’t have to like Assange or endorse what he and WikiLeaks have done over the years to recognize that this indictment sets an ominous precedent and threatens basic First Amendment values…. With only modest tweaking, the very same theory could be invoked to prosecute journalists for the very same crimes being alleged against Assange, simply for doing their jobs of scrutinizing the government and reporting the news to the American people.”
We desperately need greater scrutiny and transparency, not less.
Indeed, transparency is one of those things the shadow government fears the most.
Why? Because it might arouse the distracted American populace to actually exercise their rights and resist the tyranny that is inexorably asphyxiating their freedoms.
This need to shed light on government actions—to make the obscure, least transparent reaches of government accessible and accountable—was a common theme for Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, who famously coined the phrase, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.”
Writing in January 1884, Brandeis explained:
“Light is the only thing that can sweeten our political atmosphere—light thrown upon every detail of administration in the departments; light diffused through every policy; light blazed full upon every feature of legislation; light that can penetrate every recess or corner in which any intrigue might hide; light that will open up to view the innermost chambers of government, drive away all darkness from the treasury vaults; illuminate foreign correspondence; explore national dockyards; search out the obscurities of Indian affairs; display the workings of justice; exhibit the management of the army; play upon the sails of the navy; and follow the distribution of the mails.”
Of course, transparency is futile without a populace that is informed, engaged and prepared to hold the government accountable to abiding by the rule of law.
For this reason, it is vital that citizens have the right to criticize the government without fear.
After all, we’re citizens, not subjects. For those who don’t fully understand the distinction between the two and why transparency is so vital to a healthy constitutional government, Manning explains it well:
“When freedom of information and transparency are stifled, then bad decisions are often made and heartbreaking tragedies occur – too often on a breathtaking scale that can leave societies wondering: how did this happen? … I believe that when the public lacks even the most fundamental access to what its governments and militaries are doing in their names, then they cease to be involved in the act of citizenship. There is a bright distinction between citizens, who have rights and privileges protected by the state, and subjects, who are under the complete control and authority of the state.”
Manning goes on to suggest that the U.S. “needs legislation to protect the public’s right to free speech and a free press, to protect it from the actions of the executive branch and to promote the integrity and transparency of the US government.”
Technically, we’ve already got such legislation on the books: the First Amendment.
The First Amendment gives the citizenry the right to speak freely, protest peacefully, expose government wrongdoing, and criticize the government without fear of arrest, isolation or any of the other punishments that have been meted out to whistleblowers such as Edwards Snowden, Assange and Manning.
The challenge is holding the government accountable to obeying the law.
More than 50 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in United States v. Washington Post Co. to block the Nixon Administration’s attempts to use claims of national security to prevent The Washington Post and The New York Times from publishing secret Pentagon papers on how America went to war in Vietnam.
As Justice William O. Douglas remarked on the ruling, “The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell.”
More than 50 years later, the people’s right to know about government misconduct continues to be pitted against the might of the Deep State.
Yet this isn’t merely about whether whistleblowers and journalists are part of a protected class under the Constitution. It’s a debate over how long “we the people” will remain a protected class under the Constitution.
Following the current downward trajectory, it won’t be long before anyone who believes in holding the government accountable is labeled an “extremist,” is relegated to an underclass that doesn’t fit in, must be watched all the time, and is rounded up when the government deems it necessary.
Eventually, we will all be potential suspects, terrorists and lawbreakers in the eyes of the government.
All of us are in danger.
Partisan politics have no place in this debate: Americans of all stripes would do well to remember that those who question the motives of government provide a necessary counterpoint to those who would blindly follow where politicians choose to lead.
We don’t have to agree with every criticism of the government, but we must defend the rights of all individuals to speak freely without fear of punishment or threat of banishment.
Never forget: what the architects of the police state want are submissive, compliant, cooperative, obedient, meek citizens who don’t talk back, don’t challenge government authority, don’t speak out against government misconduct, and don’t step out of line.
What the First Amendment protects—and a healthy constitutional republic requires—are individuals such as Julian Assange who routinely exercise their right to speak truth to power.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, the right to speak out against government wrongdoing is the quintessential freedom.
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His book Battlefield America: The War on the American People (SelectBooks, 2015) is available online at www.amazon.com. Whitehead can be contacted at [email protected]. Nisha Whitehead is the Executive Director of The Rutherford Institute. Information about The Rutherford Institute is available at www.rutherford.org.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
You’ve got to admire the UK division of the cabal for having the foresight to install FPTP for a coup 200 years later !
Tyrannical leaders following a satanic agenda..
You will always be lied to by others.
All you can do is be honest with yourself.
You said it. Others is also yourself why you always will be lied to by yourself. You can only break the link by saying others will be telling you the truth.
Because that is the way it is. Only people from outside will have the experience and be able to tell you how you really act.
If they then tell you the truth, you then should be able to be honest with yourself.
Good article, like many I read in OffG.
But why is the most important information never seen in OffG?
That is… What exactly is the “Deep State”, “ruling class”, “elite oligarchs” (whatever it may be called) that is constantly mentioned here?
If such entity exists (and it seems it may exist), it must be comprised of a *very elaborate* network capable of reaching every small town politician, news outlet and education system in every corner of the world (save a few exceptions).
If you ever explain how such a system operates, and give an idea of who is meeting where to make decisions (this must happen somewhere with someone), then your message will be much more effective.
Eternally talking about a group of mega-powerful people without saying who they are or how they (specifically) operate, does not do much.
They are gvt agents, mostly anonymous, they operate under the table so to speak, but have direct control of the legal system, the gvt.
If you want to know who they are, just notice the loudest voices when they dont get there way.
The centralisation of the propaganda became forever inescapable with covid. This presentation of a “deadly virus”, whose effects were already non-existent way back in early 2020 when the media had to rely on weaponizing the most mundane events, all across all channels showed up the regimentation of the media and therefore the existence of a “Deep State” – for want of a better term.
Since this entity is, by definition, obscured, it is impossible to run off a handy list of names and addresses. You watch the developments; you note the lines of propaganda, and the contradictions and deceptions. You try to make as many as possible aware of these movements. You try to install a deep mistrust of anything the media says. But to expect the aforementioned handy list is to expect the whole deck of slimy operators to hold up their hands and say, “Oh it was us! Here we are!” And you are then in the absurd position of only believing the rot of the media …when you hear about it on the media!
Fair enough about the names….
But let’s discuss the system that *must exist* for a small group of people to get their way onto just about EVERY town in the world, their media, governments and academics.
If the “ruling class” exists, then whoever they are must have figured out some way of achieving the (apparently) impossible. What kind of system must exist for such control to happen?
Let’s be honest… it sounds outlandish. It may be true but still sounds outlandish and that is why so many people can’t believe it.
I think this is the type of information that this outlet (Off G) should be exploring at this point.
The aforementioned network doesn’t need to be as indepth as you expect. At a certain level of power or influence their money will do the rest of the corrupting down to local government, media, academia layers.
“Their money”
How does that money (“their money” whoever “they” are) get to every single news outlet, mayor and education system in every single town everywhere on the planet (save a few exceptions)… to have them all say the same absurd message and enforce the same absurd restrictions?
Really… let’s get this into an article
Their money is already there. The very operations of capitalism permit control over information. The ruling class didn’t have to “take over the world”. They already own it.
Look at transgenderism. The most asinine idiotic reversal of reality constantly queried by so many is nevertheless rammed down your throat by “the authorities” and “the Science”. It’s everywhere and it won’t go away. This can only be the effects of rule of the media by a tiny elite.
I’m always amazed by this ridiculously naive assumption that there was once a totally open honest media but it’s been “taken over” by some elite and then the cry that this “impossibility” has to be explained. The media was never open and honest. The ruling class have always been here. There has always been control over information exercise by the very movements of finance and the workings of capitalism as e.g. Noam Chomsky (despite his later fall from grace) has shown.
Thank you, but the questions are not answered….
You talk about “the media” as if it was one simple thing. There are thousands of publications around the world in all countries that are owned by locals, plus there are thousands of small town politicians that cannot possibly meet or know billionaires like Bill Gates, Soros, etc. The universities are local as well… how does the “elite class” keep all these millions of people in check?
What kind of *system* is necessary to achieve this and how is it implemented?
Its the financial system, controlled and implemented by the creation of the federal reserve by full faith and credit and kept in check by the systems rules of law.
Or, he who has the most gold, makes the most rules.
Take for example, Paraguay during Covid…
Who is telling all the newspapers, politicians and teachers to vilify and censor anyone that does not believe in harsh lockdown restrictions?
Obviously there is REASON to doubt such idiotic measures not based on any science… so how do they get so many to go on board?
You are stretching your examples very far and wide, the public is easily persuaded, they will believe most of what they are told, so how? Gullible.
First the glaring reality of the repetition cannot be denied and so however it was done, it was definitely done.
The large channels are directed as to what content to deliver. There was no variation in the covid tale and in four years after so many questions and so much uncovering of absurdities, the media has never changed. Furthermore the fabled “scientific community” were clearly bought out too. Of course there were dissenting voices but they were marginalised and easily denounced with the Pavlovian “conspiracy theory” label.
The model followed by all the channels whether large or small follows a pattern illustrated by Noam Chomsky i.e. to get ahead in journalism you learn to internalise the values of the paper you report for. You soon get to know what you can and cannot report. Of course you could go against the grain but if you do you will be relegated to forever making the tea.
You could fool them all by pretending to go along and then “spilling the beans” but the anti-bodies of the system then leap into action and apologise for the frightful breakdown you’ve had and you are relegated to the rest room. If the worst come to the worst, you can always be shipped off to the “nutty fringe” which is a booming industry that the rulers have no intention of banning since they can easily smear it through a network of connectors pushing aliens, anti-Semitism and Nazism into the brew. There’s no need to ban anything since all the info can be managed. Furthermore, this requires very few people to be actually “in on it”. The system produces plenty of useful players who believe what they write.
The smaller sources work in exactly the same way.
I’ll explain:
The world is created. The question is: who is the creator? Does the creator have good will or not?
The whole world has fallen into sin, which means we have rejected the Good Creator (the Truth of God) and believed lies.
Now, this is about to change. It’s because souls together with God decided to end sin. And that’s why these things have happened. That’s why it can be clearly seen, for those with eyes, what is what. In Revelation things are clearly seen: all evil as evil, all darkness as darkness, all lies as lies.
Then again, the Light of Truth is what shall prevail. So, in the end, God will destroy sin and its servants, false gods, demons and false prophets.
The false god of Mammon is one of those worshipped widely. Almost every article here talks about Mammon. All false gods are created by men. Just like money.
Money is basically just a false belief. It is not a person, and it is impossible to name people responsible for that evil and the systems it has created. As this is a spiritual war, and the Devil knows its time is up (or, it only has a short window of opportunity), it has summoned all false gods in their attempt to save themselves. But they can’t be saved.
Sure, the media, AI, religions are in it, but it really is not that simple. When the plandemic started, even friends, family and people who should know better went along with it. This is because it’s the false spirit making them do so. It’s like they are possessed, and that’s exactly what has happened. The whole world has been deceived and needs God’s help.
Spiritual war must be fought spiritually. Uniting with God’s Spirit is the way. So we stay with God and God makes things happen. That’s how the Creator changes things whatever they are.
How do we fight lies? With truth. We fight evil with goodness, darkness with light, war with peace. The Devil does the opposite. Spiritual war is when Satan, the adversary of God, attacks everything that is good or true. It attacks humanity, life, nature, reason, justice, freedom, everything that belongs with God. The Devil is not all-powerful. It is not all-knowing. It is, in fact, just a needless lie.
But it’s still fighting for its survival. It is trying to save this evil system it has created.
But nothing will save the Devil, and it can’t save itself.
The long history of sin is not forever. What was born will die. Meanwhile, God is eternal and absolutely good. And God saves the souls, since we belong with God.
As long as anyone, including politicians, is dominated by his/her/it/them ego the full truth is impossible to perceive for that person. The more ego, the less truth.
< The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that people would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them >
The words of Hannah Arendt ring even more true today under the Iron Heel of Anglo Zionazi Capitalism than they did under the Jackboot of Nazi Germany.
This protective cynicism is readily apparent in OffG: “They’r all in it together”.
“Dann ist es Alles heuchelei” (So it’s All a con”) — Tamino after listening to The Queen of the Night (“an evil lady who means to deceive the people). Actually the Queen has lied to him, and Zarastro is a actually a true blue Goodie; but Tamino will have to go through a lot of self-inflicted pain before he realizes the truth.
This is morally wrong.
This short sentence, and the insistent spouting of toothless “American” legalisms, shows the depth of imperial delusion. The issue is justice, not morals. Peoples outside the Insane Empire want to be left alone.
The true enemy wears suits and ties and speaks only in LIES
So now we have lone skum saying civil war in the UK is inevitable.
There has been a lot of not so subtle predictive programming about civil war in the US
I say, hang the bankers and politicians.
The politicians only currency is LIES
China.
A world leader in Big Brother PARANOIA and CONTROL FREAKISM.
‘Artist as family’ blog.
(Australian family of three travelling through China experiencing our future of CORPORATE FACISM).
Sorry couldn’t post link.
(On dumb phone).
While having a beer at the local pub last evening, showing on the large wall-teevee was the Aussie vs Brazil beach volleyball contest. The Aussie girls were a sight ! Dressed almost naked, and their panties cutting deep into their bum cracks (K) / butt cracks (US).
I expected today to read the Pope had expressed outrage at such scantily clad women, you know “Think of the children watching !”. But so far, no word. I’m sure Russians watching were thankful Russians were not participating in the corrupting Paris Cesspool.
Got a ways to go. But not much evidently. Didn’t some participate naked in the Rome Olympics?
That is the fashion now in when I have been visiting U.K and E.U
That’s how they dress in high school here in the US.
Politics is a totally corrupt circus act, where the actors have been hired to perform a show. No one under their big top is immune from their corruption not even the animals or the audience.
All narratives lead to Rome…
“The earth is degenerating today.
Bribery and corruption abound.
Children no longer obey their parents,
every man wants to write a book, and
it is evident the end of the world
is fast approaching.”
– Assyrian tablet. c.2800 BC
They eat.
They shit.
They lie.
Twas ever thus.
And will ever be.
Politicians (and the media) lie because they’ve been captured by the powers that actually be.Fully bought and paid for. They even bragg about it.
George Bernard Shaw once said: “A Newspaper is a device unable to
distinguish between a bicycle accident and the collapse of civilization.”
Of course this is purposely so, as omissions are another form of propaganda.
That being said, a regular on MSNBC “Morning Joe” is
Mara Gay. She’s on the New York Times editorial board and is a female minority who’s selected to
“blackwash” Imperialism.
Last week, Gay commented that foreign policy isn’t a concern of most voters. Perhaps, that’s because news commentators spend more time analyzing the Olympics and other athletic endeavors rather than providing a truthful detailed analysis of the various proxy wars occurring in Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
If genuine data was provided to mainstream media news viewers, they’d quickly realize how paramount foreign policy is in determining national policies as well as the future of all Americans.
So Shaw said that? But who buy these Newspapers every fokking day?
A Politician lie every time his/her lips are moving. Ohh someone said that. But who select/elect/made their Xis on them the voting day?
So your bank cheat you everytime you put your money in there. But who is borrowing as much you can to spend it all on a sportscar you cant afford to play big guy for your neighbours?
Is it fair to spend your whole life blaming others for your own poor performance???
“We all exist in our own personal reality of craziness.” 😁
Politicians lie because people believe them. People “cant handle the truth !”
Deport Islam. No alternative, really, no other option.
Please explain why.
I’m asking because I am genuinely interested.
You may have something, or you may not.
Deport Die Kleinbürger, The Sheeple, The AmeriFats, The Usurers, The Zionists.
Here in the UK Starmer has started his authoritarianism right out the blocks by setting up a police hit squad of thousands. No-one wants to see riots but the problem is pro mass immigration created by corporate leaders and government direct involvement. The people are at the end of their tether and sick fed up with bankers puppets like Starmer the Trilateral.
One of the causes of the problem is the politicization of immigration — it suits a certain foreign policy objective to combine sanctions with welcoming ‘defectors’ from that country. What started out as minimal and effectively harmless, though, has mushroomed into a monster, one that’s spawned its own industry, lobbyists etc. This has got people annoyed because they’re suffering real poverty and hardship while a lot of the displaced/dispossed who swarm the shores are anything but (put simply, I don’t know many people in England who could come up with the money that the travel agents charge to get you into the country).
Pushing back against this perception with scolding — only a heartless brute would deny the weak and helpless etc. — just lets the pressure build up. Its exploded, unfortunately. (The catalyst might have been Southport but it was going to explode sooner or later.) Guilt tripping everyone by repeating the mantra ‘far right’ isn’t helping so concrete steps are needed, and I see that Sir Starmer has gone full Gendarmarie on everyone, calling for a special police force dedicated to maintaining public order. (It exists anyway but now’s the time to bring it out into the open.) Its definitely got that dystopian feel now…..but cracking heads just won’t solve the problem.
Immigration is a destabilisation tools. Financial fraudsters use it to weaken the target country.
Ever wonder why tens of thousands of people flee their homelands? Two reasons, and there are many, is because the West or their proxies bomb them to kingdom come, or sanction them into much worse poverty. This is usually because countries get fed up of trading with the dollar. The West’s destabilisation of Syria caused the largest displacement of civilians since WWII. All because of US bully-boy hegemony that most Americans have no idea exists.
Islam is being used deliberately to cause division. That’s why it has been imported and encouraged to thrive.
Muslims have been allowed to break laws with impunity. Not a word said by politicians or the media, instead a reason to blame white people is always contrived.
This builds up resentment over time.
This is exactly what they want.
Even now that sub human rat Starmer stands there blaming everything on white people, calling them far right.
Rioting is wrong. Destroying buildings and properties is wrong. But when the muslims do it, or blm, barely a word is said. Indeed, as i said, they blame white people.
But as soon white people do it, the ‘full force of the law’ is suddenly awakened!
Again, this is done to cause even more resentment.
Islam is a problem. Of course, woke middle class whites just don’t get it. I grew up around muslims. I do get it. They become more hateful with each generation here in the uk.
But this is exactly what they want.
Their goal is to destroy nations and replace them with a single mongrel world population of low intelligence. Ripe for being used as slaves.
Mass migration into Europe of people from incompatible cultures and religions is very much part of that plan.
The people on both sides are being used as pawns in their global game.
“His lips are moving” – implies that it is gender specific whereas it is not. It applies regardless of whether the gonads are worn externally or internally or are removed for the convenience of the wearer, they all lie.
“His” does not imply gender. One of the dictionary definitions of “his”: “belonging to or connected with a person or animal that has just been mentioned and whose gender is not known or not considered to be important:”
“Make no mistake: the government is waging war on journalists and whistleblowers for disclosing information relating to government misconduct that is within the public’s right to know.”
Apologies for being pedantic.
I have over the last three weeks witnessed censoring of my comments upon multiple platforms regarding certain key events.
I have noticed a large number of influencers making attacks and claims against big institutions associated with law and order, and crime investigation etc.
While my commentary referencing my own attempts to find out some truth in events backed up with logical arguments and actual evidence has been censored.
If the above statement you make here in my quote Mark’s is true, then how is it that these influencers who have huge followings are permitted to make those visceral attacks, and mine just wiped, or as is now common, still be seen by the commenter, but when logging in as someone else are not visible.
That’s the issue I am having. It now means that when I post comments I back them up by recording them in a screenshot, as I will do with this one.
Is this the way it has to be now?
And, if it is, that’s terrifying, because it means that as hard as you try, you can no longer make any statement at all in the confidence it will actually be seen.
Other than on Twitter of course, that I do not use. And the danger of that single platform and the following it thus garners, breeds extreme levels of suspicion in my mind.
Get off the net, and organise
Just had all my comments removed from a live stream on YouTube just adding none offensive speculation.
Had the official warning and everything.
Something very malign is happening right now.
I actually feel scared.
I recorded myself making the comments.
For the sake of clarity my comments here refer to the events of the Trump rally, not the UK riots.
My words that so offended YouTube were mentioning the 3 audible shots from the counter sniper at the beginning, and shot 9 that hit the hydraulic arm of the tele handler, punching through 10mm of steel plate. Only an armour piercing round could do that, not an AR round.
For me it proves that I must be on the right track if such speculation is to be completely censored.
Your picture, the ahem… bullet path…
Check out and compare an image of a plane contrail.
Yes that bullet path was actually a plane contrail!
Someone could probably prove it by looking at the path of planes upon the day.
Also, they are using the word “thuggery”
I’ll let you research “thuggees” yourself and wonder why occult obsessed morons might want to, in common parlance, “culturally appropriate” that term.
Ok, i’ll give you a clue.
Thuggees worshipped Kali.
Kali is the Hindu goddess of change, destruction and death.
You’re welcome
The very fact these idiots are now advocating “facial recognition” as something that will assist in deterring and identifying MASKED people should show you:
A) they want facial recognition for other reasons
B) they are mocking you
Watching the world burn episode 77:
3+7+8=18
18=6+6+6
1+8=9
9=3×3
Stinks of the perversion of the occult, eh?
Mocking you to your face.
…Supreme Court ruled 6-3 = 3×6 = 666.
The Lightbringer thrown upon every detail of administration in the departments; the Lightbringer diffused through every policy; the Lightbringer blazed full upon every feature of legislation; the Lightbringer that can penetrate every recess or corner in which any intrigue might hide; the Lightbringer that will open up.
Defund the Police State and everything will be fine. We can do it!
Not gonna happen. Do it yourself. Get off the net and organise.
Once you are in the network you cant get off. You are networker? Networking is Freemason, Rotary, any undercover club, 33, 666, Labour.
Who has network? Only four-legged creatures who work down under far from the sun light. Only rodents make and have networks and are networkers.
Free men walk freely alone under the sun and obey only the One above.
You keep advising commenters to “get off the net and organise.” I assume you’ve never actually tried doing that.
If you live in a condominium community, for example, and you try your best to alert your fellow residents that there’s something fishy going on involving the Association Board; and all you get are blank stares – then you will see the near impossibility of organization.
An organizer must have one quality above all others: the complete absence of the ability to abstract. Because even an ounce of abstraction will hopelessly poison the organization. It must ALL be emotional ALL the time. The last thing a “good” organizer wants is thinking members in the organization.
An organization is nothing more than a Collective Id (that’s “ID” and not “I” “D”).
Trump’s speech as he was supposedly shot at (ear suddenly “miraculously” healed; father of alleged assassin walking around with someone disguised by a mask and hoodie) is a good example of lying by omission…
Trump was patting himself on the back for low immigration in the final year of his Presidency. That was of course 2020 – was there anything else going on then that might have had something to do with low immigration? Lockdowns!
BTW it’s utterly in character that Tony Blair thinks his FOI Act was his biggest mistake as PM. It scarcely even applies to UK central government but it was useful for getting some info out of state bodies like the NHS.
There are hidden within government lies soothing hands comforting and providing cover for those who hear those lies. Citizens of nations on their way to becoming authoritarian instinctively know this. For they know that if they never heard about something they can never be accused of complicity. Lies from their “leaders” allow them to continue doing or nothing.
“We didn’t know” is the double edged sword that, even as it shelters a do-nothing populace, slowly enslaves it. Therefore, citizens of nations mutter “We didn’t know” at their own peril.
Raiklin
Why no mention of Ivan Raillin?
The only way to get politicians to tell the truth is to require them to put up the sort of collateral against lying that would mean they would kill themselves before lying.
You know, like: ‘If you lie about this, your children will be shot through the back of the head on prime time television.’
Politicians lie because it is in their financial interests, that’s the way the non-elite rich people have set up the world.
If the politicians have already been threatened by non-elite rich people to stop them telling the truth, then they must name the non-elite rich people, who can then be taken down extrajudicially.
This won’t change if the non-elite rich can continue behaving with impunity.
It will only change if the censures to be enacted for that impunity are sufficient to make them change.
Oddly enough, when asked about 911, Assange said it’s not worth looking into.
Makes you wonder why they exist… I’m glad he’s free but they went along with the 911 and COVID official stories.
He’s likely to be right on that. Its not that there’s nothing to be learned from re-examining 9/11 and assassinations like those of JFK, RFK but they’re history, increasingly remote history to many people. Meanwhile the same kind of rewriting of history is going on under our noses.
There’s a lot to be learned from media coverage of the Gaza genocide, for example. Everything from lopsided coverage of casualties and general indifference to murders of individuals in a foreign country by a state that deems them a problem to academic retribution against students that have protested about this. Its in in plain sight, it does get reported on here and there, but its as if a thick blanket is cast over these events — and you can bet that over time the history and chronology will be adjusted — colored mostly by omission — to perpetuate the line that we’re used to, that is the ‘plucky little state doing what it had to in order to survive’.
Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. But hey, history is boring and so over, why bother with it?
“Its not that there’s nothing to be learned from re-examining 9/11 and assassinations like those of JFK, RFK but they’re history, increasingly remote history to many people. Meanwhile the same kind of rewriting of history is going on under our noses.”
So… any brazen Falsification of History we don’t collectively call them on immediately, according to some unheard of statute of limitations, they get to call THE TRUTH, with not a peep from people who know better?
Who made up this shamelessly Orwellian History /”History” game you reference and to what purpose?
“Makes you wonder why they exist”
Before anyone had heard of Wikileaks, we got two mainstream mentions of it:
“Wikileaks.org, founded by dissidents in China and other nations, plans to post secret government documents and to protect them from censorship with coded software.”
and
“By March, more than one million leaked documents from governments and corporations in Asia, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and the former Soviet Bloc will be available online in a bold new collective experiment in whistle-blowing. That is, of course, as long as you don’t accept any of the conspiracy theories brewing that Wikileaks.org could be a front for the CIA or some other intelligence agency.”
The first reference I mention was written by Cass Sunstein and published in the Washington Post (Feb 24, 2007) and the second reference was published by Time Magazine (January 22, 2007).
Cass Sunstein (mister “Crippled Epistemologies” himself) waves already enough red flags for a May Day parade, but please note how he spins Wikileaks as “founded by dissidents in China”! And then note Time mag’s hand waving “don’t accept any of the conspiracy theories brewing that Wikileaks.org could be a front for the CIA”
That’s all we ever needed to know.