92

How (and why) they sell X as a “bastion of free speech”

Kit Knightly

Donald Trump is back on the app formerly known as Twitter. After almost four years in the “Truth Social” wilderness he sat down with Elon Musk for a 3-hour conversation.

On our side of the pond, Musk is taking every opportunity he can to troll Keir Starmer’s government, comparing the UK to something from 1984 (accurately, it must be said).

During the Olympics, he chimed in with criticism of controversial Algerian boxer Imane Khelif for being a “man beating up women”.

Wherever there is controversy, Musk (or the PR intern running his X account) appears to pour fuel on the fire.

That’s not to say everything Musk says is wrong. A lot of it is right, or at least defensible and rational, but I think that itself is an integral part of the construction. Sugar among the salt, aiding in the sale of the overriding narrative:

“Elon Musk – the world’s richest man, and Free Speech Champion”.

(subtext – there are some oligarchs you can really trust)

How did it come to this? And Why?

To give you my answer  to that, let’s go back in time a few years B.E. – Before Elon.

Under the ancien régime, Twitter purged the alt-news crowd, labelled provably real people as bots, and told dissenters “If you don’t like it, go and start your own platform”.

The trouble with that was…that’s exactly what they did. Newer smaller versions of Twitter began to appear –  Truth Social and Gab and so on and so on.

And when you’re an all-encompassing supranational corporate-governmental monster addicted to surveillance and control…that’s kinda counterproductive, because now you can’t hear what’s being said, and you can’t steer the conversation.

What is the point of spending billions creating a massive surveillance network if you keep banning all the people you want to surveil?

What good is it spending the budget of a medium-sized country on influencers, bots and shills, and then stopping people from seeing them?

No, banning doesn’t work, it just puts people outside your system of influence and control.

Outside the system is bad, they need everyone inside. They don’t care if you’re praising or criticising, loving or hating, defending its existence or denying it – everything is acceptable, as long as you do it where they can see you.

They needed to invite those banished souls back inside, and the most efficient way of doing that was to adapt the Red/Blue fake dichotomy model of elections to the world of social media.

In short, to bring the banned people back and patch over the hole they’d made, they needed to rehabilitate Twitter.

Enter Elon Musk, and “X”.

It’s all about creating a controlled opposition.

The contrived binary between the “good” social media platforms –  whose CEOs attend congressional hearings and simper about “social responsibility”  vs the “bad” social media platforms – whose CEOs post rude memes.

The “safe space” vs the “free-for-all” (or at least, the pretence of a free-for-all – but we’ll get to that).

From the moment Musk acquired Twitter, the rebrand was on.

Alternate media journalists were invited to inspect Twitter’s “top secret files” and came away with some “shocking” revelations, including:

  • Twitter engaged in “visibility filtering” (aka shadow banning) and algorithmic censorship of anti-establishment people and opinions!
  • Twitter enabled the Pentagon to operate sock puppet accounts for running psyops!
  • National governments used to ask Twitter to remove stuff, and sometimes they did!

Phew! Who knew, right?

It always amazes me how much traction they get by simply telling people an incredibly watered-down version of what we already know. I guess because we are all so pathetically grateful to hear even a small amount of semi-truth coming from ‘official sources’.

But the Twitter files were just the start, further displays of overt ‘pro-free speech’ behaviour followed. Most recently including unbanning Trump and announcing the closure of X’s Brazil office rather than complying with government censorship.

All of this has contributed to the birth of a cult of personality around Elon as the supposed “champion of free expression”, with X itself labelled the “last bastion of free speech”.

In the wake of the so-called assassination attempt on Donald Trump, the rallying cry of the Musk worshippers was “thank God for X, or we’d never have known the truth”.

So you get memes like this…

The branding is clear: Musk is the people’s billionaire, the “pick me” mogul who’s “not like the other oligarchs”.

You don’t need me to explain how useful this dynamic is in controlling mass opinion. It’s creating organised religion for the atheist generation. Tenets of faith no different in purpose and far tackier in presentation.

Importantly we should ask: Has Twitter even really improved now that it’s “X”?

No it hasn’t. The “left-wing” Musk critics are right about that.

Maybe there is an increased amount of overt racism and race-baiting, or maybe now it’s just promoted. Either way, there’s no ignoring it.

What equally can’t be ignored is the massive proliferation of ads and porn bots and the same gifs and videos clogging every discussion. Monetisation has led to an avalanche of accounts farming engagement with blatant clickbait, ragebait, cutebait….just, all the bait.

All the while, these newly unpleasant facets of X are being brandished by the pro-censorship “left”, and used to discredit the very idea of free speech in general.

“See, absolute freedom of speech just means racism and porn”, they get to say, “We need more regulation!”

Now, there’s an argument that all the bait could be considered “the acceptable price of free speech”…

…if free speech was what we actually got.

But it’s not.

For some reason, since the “Twitter files” released and in combination with Musk’s unearned reputation as a “free speech absolutist”, people have assumed that Twitter – now X – no longer allows shadowbans, psy-ops or cooperates with government-backed censorship.

But they do. They very obviously do.

Case in point: OffG. We have a Twitter/X account with almost 61,000 followers.

Back when Twitter was Still Twitter  any link to our website was subject to an auto-warning that it might be potential spam. We were also intermittently shadowbanned, which had a very obvious effect on our reach, though our tweets could still get thousands of retweets and likes.

When Twitter became X the auto-warning was removed.

But our reach diminished –  massively.  We are now told all the time that people haven’t seen our tweets or links in years. A successful tweet of ours gets maybe 200 likes, most remain in double figures.

So, for our account at least, “uncensored” X is no kind of improvement.

CJ Hopkins (who has written about this psyop himself) was temporarily labelled a distributor of “adult content”, and hidden behind warnings, while dozens of OnlyFans girls can be found in almost any reply chain shilling their “wares”.

This is quite obvious “visibility filtering” in action, and all the truly anti-establishment thinkers are subject to it.

It’s all about “speech not reach”, ensuring all independent thought is quarantined off in its own little virtual “free speech cages”.

Instead of banning the voices they don’t want to speak, they lock them up in soundproof rooms where they can scream their lungs out, and only the FBI agents set to monitor them can hear, and only bots designed to control them will respond.

Now, clearly that’s preferable to going to prison for posting anti-immigrant memes, but should free speech really be graded on that curve?

Nevertheless, that’s the situation in which we find ourselves.

So, what we’re left with is two versions of “free speech” to choose from…neither of which is actual free speech.

The battle lines are drawn up and either you’re with the government or you’re with Elon Musk. An entirely fake a war between overt censorship and covert censorship.

They won’t allow a third way. Like everything else these days.

Thanks for reading...

You can help us keep doing what we do. Every little helps and is hugely appreciated.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Categories: latest, The "New Normal"
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

92 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Posthumous
Posthumous
Sep 5, 2024 2:56 AM

The idea that we need a billionaire to buy us some free speech is pretty silly.

Kim Carlson
Kim Carlson
Sep 4, 2024 1:11 AM

This hits the nail on it’s surveilled, tracked, and censored head.

Stuart Davies
Stuart Davies
Sep 3, 2024 11:13 PM

Spot on, Kit.

Echo
Echo
Aug 28, 2024 8:52 PM

Proud dissident.
And every time I share this article to X, it vanishes

Salty light
Salty light
Aug 28, 2024 1:41 AM

Not related to this article but I was wondering if you were going to give us your take on RFK Jr endorsing Donald Trump?

Hege Fredriksen
Hege Fredriksen
Aug 25, 2024 4:36 PM

Good one! CHEERs! 🙂

antonym
antonym
Aug 25, 2024 9:33 AM

The inventor & CEO of Telegram, Russian born Pavel Durov, was arrested on Le Bourget, Paris from his private jet last night on the way to Dubai, his residence. He is now getting French just-us / lawfare.

Liberté, égalité, fraternité under Macron.

D Hall
D Hall
Aug 26, 2024 6:38 PM
Reply to  antonym

Wasn’t he a YGL 2017?

Posthumous
Posthumous
Sep 5, 2024 2:57 AM
Reply to  D Hall

I think so.

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
Aug 24, 2024 11:15 AM

Pot & Kettle!

Marb
Marb
Aug 24, 2024 6:11 AM

Thanks Kit ….Ive often wondered about so called Alt Social Media including such Video sites as Bitchute and Rumble , might they not also be digital ghettos , where non conformists , dissenters what have You can be surveilled if not Controlled .. thanks for Your continued efforts at maintaining some sane discourse and a genuine non partisanship … The Person i live with asks if Catte Black is ok … Hope so … Cheers!

JT Kong
JT Kong
Aug 24, 2024 2:04 AM

Illusion 1: Space X marketed as space exploration and Mars colonization.
Reality: Low earth orbit space fence enabling real time monitoring and targeting of any coordinate on the planet’s surface.

Illusion 2: Neurolink. Merging humans with machine as our only solution to AI supplanting human intelligence.
Reality: The internet of bodies and the bio-digital panopticon. The brain becomes the next gen cell phone, where C6ISR military contractors like Palantir (managed by Vance’s puppeteer Thiel) can transmit signal directly into our neuronal synapse junctions.

Illusion 3: Tesla. The enlightened energy efficient future of point to point travel.
Reality: 15 minute Smart Cities and the control of all travel by centralized algorithmic authority.

Illusion 4: X. Free speech with only limited controls.
Reality: Speech without reach + ongoing and continuous scraping of individual data to feed the maw of the global AI control grid (see #1, 2, 3 above)

Wil
Wil
Aug 24, 2024 12:33 AM

Kit, it seems like your head is about to explode… Of course, Musk is not “trustworthy”…
Do you know anyone alive who is trustworthy, and has true open, un-agenda-driven critical thought and behavior??? BUT, the truth is that this society is so truly fucked-up that Elon having X is probably the best case scenario one could hope for….
Is Elon playing with the Sheeple population, of course…. In his situation, his ego, he’s probably bored a lot….
You, on the other hand, Kit, should be able to deal with it better than today’s column…
We all need to hope for Elon to retain whatever piece of his Soul still remains, because watching this Democrat slimy-clown show roll towards the coming Avian/Monkey pox/Kackle Harris/Tampon-Guy Nov. Psyop is WAY MORE DANGEROUS than Elon playing with “Twitter” !!!!!!
Maybe get some better Anti-anxiety meds….

Tom Larsen
Tom Larsen
Aug 23, 2024 11:17 PM

I have right wing friends that are offended that I would challenge them that Elon is anything but thee champion of free speech. When I send them hard proof that he is not, they simply ignore it.

Wil
Wil
Aug 24, 2024 12:35 AM
Reply to  Tom Larsen

How were your “Right wing” friends when Elon was a Dem ????

Tom Larsen
Tom Larsen
Aug 24, 2024 12:51 AM
Reply to  Wil

What? You don’t really expect them to be consistent do you?

Rob Suisse
Rob Suisse
Aug 23, 2024 11:03 PM

Or is it just a huge rat trap to see who can be bothered to speak up and then target them during the breakdown? Anyway who cares what choice do we have anyway?

Rhys Jaggar
Rhys Jaggar
Aug 23, 2024 4:54 PM

X is a bastion of verbal diahorrhea, an open charter for bots, trolls and malevolent people to engage in online bullying etc etc.

antonym
antonym
Aug 23, 2024 3:45 PM

Binary thinking is passé. The mind can manage black vs white and at max. some grey.
Truth can appear over the whole spectrum, it depends on how less biased we look.

At present X is a useful place, although a bit of an echo chamber. Musk was frustrated with his son being warped into a trans kid outside his knowledge: looks genuine.

In 2025 X might be junk, but so might OG be. Good training ground though.

Nicholas.creed
Nicholas.creed
Aug 23, 2024 3:23 PM
Wil
Wil
Aug 24, 2024 12:37 AM
Reply to  Nicholas.creed

Best be more concerned with the Dems and “Agenda 2024″…..
We’ll be lucky to make it to 2030….

Kees
Kees
Aug 24, 2024 7:26 AM
Reply to  Wil

Sir, you seem to be stuck in two horrible choices. What if both are not going to give you what you would like to see happening?
Scary? Frightening?

Well hop on board and let’s have some fun on our bumpy ride towards 2030. Because you can’t vote your way out of this.

The reason he warns you about musk et al is because more and more people think this is the way to freedom.
It’s deliberate. The “left” is meant to fall, and the “right” will be the “solution.”
The trick is that the outcome will be the same.

Your sign will be when they start asking for your identity online.
But they’re already building your digital twin. Give them a year more of your thoughts, location, whereabouts, purchases, ideology and “grok” will know you better than you know yourself.
Thought police anyone?
Chin up, it is what it is.

Lawrence Wolf
Lawrence Wolf
Aug 23, 2024 2:55 PM

ALL SO TRUE – BUT WHAT IS TO BE DONE ABOUT IT?

On the present track, World Takeover (via NWO) and the subjugation of Humanity are unstoppable because the people are clueless about what is happening around them or being done to them.

Nobody on Twitter, X or any other medium has ever divulged who is behind the NWO takeover, or how they can be defeated*. Their Power, Organisation and Financial Resources are unlimited; this is not surprising given the 3000 years they’ve spent building them up.

THEY CONTROL THE GOVERNMENTS THAT CONTROL US. UNLESS WE GET OUR ACT TOGETHER, WE’RE TOAST.

*For Instruction Manual on how to effect a Global Revolt against the ENEMY’s of HUMANITY, download here: https://icedrive.net/s/VgYbk8Ckj1zvB1akuAfQb83ACR65

Researcher
Researcher
Aug 23, 2024 5:05 PM
Reply to  Lawrence Wolf

“JFK was the last to attempt it.” Lmao.

underground poet
underground poet
Aug 23, 2024 8:53 PM
Reply to  Lawrence Wolf

Good luck, b/c the control was the circulation of money, 200 years ago the average working aged person, worked for a dollar a day [or less], so the limit of the circulation of money was limited to a dollar a day, per person, and rather easy to control.

But as time goes on and up to today, the amount of physically created saved circulated money has exploded, not to mention the money created to service the debt of that circulated money over that amount of time.

The point is that we are past the point of no return when it comes to controlling all the money, or trying to control it through any conceivable means.

And that means gvt too it appears, as the money is going to circulate, or if not, crash the system due to the lack of it.

Jean
Jean
Aug 23, 2024 2:20 PM

Don’t forget that Musk, that beacon of freedom, is pushing to put Neuralink devices in the brain of you and me.

Rhys Jaggar
Rhys Jaggar
Aug 23, 2024 4:56 PM
Reply to  Jean

Perhaps he’d desist from that if 100 million people said they’d chop his gonads off and kill his dozen children if he didn’t?

Simon
Simon
Aug 23, 2024 1:05 PM

Please don’t make ‘good’ the enemy of ‘perfect’.

mls
mls
Aug 23, 2024 4:50 PM
Reply to  Simon

X isn’t ‘good’, that’s the point. X is a scam, fake “free speech” curated to look trashy & make an argument for censorship while real alternative opinions are still actually being censored. Didn’t you read the article?

George Mc
George Mc
Aug 23, 2024 11:35 AM

I was wondering about the porn bots. I now know that if I post a tweet and instantaneously get a like, it’s always from somebody called Rebecca or Shania who poses nude whilst inviting me to “check out” her bio. Elon’s little joke no doubt.

Speaking of which, the mighty Musk himself notified me that he was following me. Should I be scared?

Johnny
Johnny
Aug 23, 2024 11:18 AM

X masks the plots?

Mega Social and Drainstream media pretend, like mainstream religions have, to offer choice.

A ten thousand year reign of deceit and violence.

Marcos França
Marcos França
Aug 23, 2024 11:15 AM

I am from Brazil, and many accounts remain censored on X (Twitter), despite X’s claims of not accepting censorship from the Supreme Court. (Note: It is not the government that is censoring and arresting critics and those posting memes, is the judiciary.)

See in this screenshot how freedom of speech X look like in Brazil: https://imgur.com/a/SyX8Wmo
comment image

Edwige
Edwige
Aug 23, 2024 11:05 AM

‘We appreciate power’ with lyrics by Musk’s ex-partner (probable inverted commas needed) Grimes:

Jax
Jax
Aug 23, 2024 10:28 AM

Elon Musk’s X routinely censors channels at the behest of EU/UK Governments. As an example, anyone located in The UK or EU who attempts to visit the RT_com channel on X will be greeted with this lovely message:

Account Withheld

@RT_com

has been withheld in AT, BE, BG, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IT, LT, LU, LV, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SE, SI, SK in response to a legal demand. https://Learn more.

Elon Musk claims to be a champion of free speech. It’s all an act.

Rolling Rock
Rolling Rock
Aug 23, 2024 4:20 PM
Reply to  Jax

It is to maintain the illusion of the NATO/West vs Russia with the rest of BRICS/multipolar world playing supporting roles. It keeps the average punter in Western countries believing in the ‘war’ and the two ‘sides’ being at each others throats.

Anyone else, desperate to view RT and Sputnik content, who are willing to spend a couple of pounds, euros or dollars a month can circumnavigate the ban with a VPN.

The magician knows how to fill the theatre and keep the seats warm throughout the show with his bag of tricks.

He left the door open for those true believers (BRICS/multipolar world cheerleaders) to walk through it while closing it to those who didn’t really want to access it anyway.

Rhys Jaggar
Rhys Jaggar
Aug 23, 2024 4:57 PM
Reply to  Jax

Plenty of web browsers do the same. I can access RT, but not through Brave, Firefox or other mainstream browsers.

Tom Larsen
Tom Larsen
Aug 23, 2024 11:21 PM
Reply to  Rhys Jaggar

What browser do you use that doesn’t block RT? (Not that RT that great, but I would like to find a browser that didn’t.)

Caged
Caged
Aug 25, 2024 8:31 PM
Reply to  Tom Larsen

You could try using TOR onion browser or Iobit VPN browser or ALOHA VPN browser

Jacobus
Jacobus
Aug 24, 2024 6:32 AM
Reply to  Rhys Jaggar

What browser do you use to access RT?

gerald brennan
gerald brennan
Aug 25, 2024 1:40 PM
Reply to  Jacobus

Brave browser. Best alternative.

James B
James B
Sep 3, 2024 9:17 PM
Reply to  Rhys Jaggar

Belated comment … I can access RT fine, using Firefox and an ancient Lenovo laptop.

illiterate goblin
illiterate goblin
Aug 23, 2024 9:29 AM

free speech article then pending every 2nd comment.

mls
mls
Aug 23, 2024 4:46 PM

But here you are, not censored. Ironic isn’t it

illiterate goblin
illiterate goblin
Aug 23, 2024 9:28 AM

I remember rightly many believed the Trump getting banned from twitter was real (you did).
it was as manufactured as his fake WWF shooting.

tiwtter is where all the you tube political idiots have now gone singing fake conspiratorial with trust the plan Jesus in king crap Trump savior hopium complex.
it is exactly like brightoen and banned Tv.

Last I saw there was a vote and musk was voted out and they also did the vote for alex jones and Trump to be reinstated and carlson also got censored by fox (if you believed that your retarded) and now twitter has Cia Carlson turned truther on as twitter is all about free speech unless if palastian then he would go there but visits the holofake musieum with Ben shillco and show netty his DOD funded factory and offers to fight some lefties Pm.

Whilst his ally crowley wife writes books about trans mr nerolink sings woke bad to the right is right conservative audience.

All the so called MIC freedom of speech shills have digital ID blue tic verification stickers like good little prefects and paying 160$ for the pleasure.

scrying all day is so fighting the deep state stuck in your digital cubicle on X double crossed.

Tommy
Tommy
Aug 23, 2024 12:58 PM

I don’t go to Twitter. Is this what it is like?

Researcher
Researcher
Aug 23, 2024 4:58 PM
Reply to  Tommy

It’s full of effing morons retweeting absolute bs. Posting links to more absolute bs.

A DoD data scraping operation and propaganda dissemination machine.

Incadog
Incadog
Aug 23, 2024 9:20 AM

“the so-called assassination attempt on Donald Trump” ?

Aethelred
Aethelred
Aug 23, 2024 1:23 PM
Reply to  Incadog

Look at his ear.

Tom Larsen
Tom Larsen
Aug 23, 2024 11:22 PM
Reply to  Aethelred

He has better looking ears than Kamala! 👂 

Karl Skellenger
Karl Skellenger
Sep 7, 2024 2:08 AM
Reply to  Incadog

Yes, listen to the last episode of my family thinks I’m crazy with Dammegard if you think the shooting was real

Clutching at straws
Clutching at straws
Aug 23, 2024 9:09 AM

I haven’t got one of those blood pressure machines but if anyone has, maybe they could do a little experiment.

Take your BP and then go on X for half an hour and take it again, then report back here ?

Brianberou
Brianberou
Aug 23, 2024 9:07 AM

When the reaction by many in the West of the paedophilic, perverted, satanic opening of the Paris Olympics reached a crescendo, X, along with the Western overlords, scrubbed it.

Their hubris convinced them that most of the West would lay down like lambs and accept these demonic practices which has been increasingly pushed in Western societies.

https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/an-in-depth-look-at-the-depravity-of-the-2024-paris-olympics-opening-ceremony/

Demiurge
Demiurge
Aug 23, 2024 10:10 AM
Reply to  Brianberou

Thanx.
Was a good read.

Axel B.C. Krauss
Axel B.C. Krauss
Aug 23, 2024 8:57 AM

And another direct hit. 👍Thank you for your great work, keep it up! From my own experience, I can only confirm what you write about Twitter. I had a shadow ban and a range limit there a long time ago, and after the takeover by the supposed “saviour” of freedom of expression Elon Musk, not the slightest thing has changed. Many other people I know can confirm that “X” has nothing to do with “freedom”.

It’s actually a very simple trick: of course Musk says the right things from time to time, because if he only ever said things that were easy to refute or debunk, it would be far too obvious. It’s a very old trick that was once described by a former CIA employee as follows: “Every good disinformation campaign consists of 80% truth and 20% lies.”

The idea is to first gain people’s trust by providing a lot of correct information that can be confirmed. This suggests to them that there is real resistance, an opposition to be taken seriously. In reality, it’s a kind of “honey trap”, nothing more.

Please keep up the good work. You are one of the few last bastions of REAL alternative media. In my country, Germany, on the other hand, there are unfortunately hardly any real ones left, but almost only gatekeepers, limited hangouts and other bought-and-paid-for disinformers and narrative controllers. The extent of lies, disinformation and manipulation in the German “alternative” media is unbearable.

So please stay the course! Love ya!

Best regards,

Axel

Aethelred
Aethelred
Aug 23, 2024 1:24 PM

“Free speech zone.”

Bob the Hod
Bob the Hod
Aug 23, 2024 8:13 AM

Get off social media and get rid of your smartphone. The first baby steps to actually getting outside of the system, and a radically dangerous idea to a lot of people. Real world speech is uncensored.

davcmat
davcmat
Aug 23, 2024 8:13 PM
Reply to  Bob the Hod

Yes absolutely; two very simple bits of resistance that anyone can do.

OffG. We have a Twitter/X account with almost 61,000 followers.

And how many of them follow your web page anyway? And if you did one last tweet:

“bye bye, c u @ https://offguardian-org

how many of those who don’t now would start doing that? What value does this corporate walled garden actually offer you?

Set an example. Take the moral high ground and get off it 🙂

rickypop
rickypop
Aug 23, 2024 8:01 AM

X BBC SKY its all bullshit. We no longer can rely on even the weather forecasts. Sorry there is a new forecast thats bang on the button:
Sonic booms, Aurora borealis, Red sun and blue moon. These all correspond with the US experimental ionosphere management using star war scalar high power radio waves, and manipulation of the jet stream. HAARP. As soon as you hear the bullshit get the shutters and umbrellas up, its going to be gales and rain for months.

T Bone
T Bone
Aug 23, 2024 7:44 AM

Maybe there is an increased amount of overt racism and race-baiting, or maybe now it’s just promoted. Either way, there’s no ignoring it.

Increased amount? For some years now anti-white racists have been free to spew their vile hatred on twitter (and everywhere else) with impunity.

A white person sharing concerns about deliberate mass importation of economic migrants is not racism.

Social media is a tool for manipulation.

Paul Vonharnish
Paul Vonharnish
Aug 23, 2024 3:03 PM
Reply to  T Bone

Social media is THE tool for manipulation. Social media is about as “social” as Social Security. An alleged program that is not secure at all…

Willem
Willem
Aug 23, 2024 7:05 AM

The reason why you lost so many views on X, or whatever they call it, may be that X, to protect itself against Russian bots (or whatever), now wants you (the individual) to log in first before you can see tweets. Reason for me, at the time, to leave Twitter behind. Apparently, many people did the same.

Sorry for your Twitter line, but have to say that most of what I saw on Twitter was useless time-consuming crap, best to be ignored. I thank the Russian bots for giving me that option.

JT Kong
JT Kong
Aug 23, 2024 5:50 AM

Well said. Xcellent analysis. The only push back I would give is on Elon’s X bot being run by an intern, rather than Darpa AI.

Thom 9
Thom 9
Aug 23, 2024 5:33 AM

Yes “X” is nothing more than “controlled opposition” masking itself in the illusion of a free speech oasis. Elon Musk is nothing more than a kinder, gentler tyrant oligarch.
Just ask Naomi Wolf about that being banned.
https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/banned-again

illiterate goblin
illiterate goblin
Aug 23, 2024 9:52 AM
Reply to  Thom 9

Naomi Wolf appears on alex jones, been mentioned by Cia carlson.
hardly calling it being censored.
ffs

Thom 9
Thom 9
Aug 23, 2024 8:14 PM

Naomi Wolf is just a recent example of “X” censorship. I don’t subscribe to her or Alex Jones the point is that they have been censored by “X”.

Thom 9
Thom 9
Aug 23, 2024 9:02 PM

Hi Admins a “pending” reply comment is stuck in the system.

Thom 9
Thom 9
Aug 24, 2024 5:21 AM
Reply to  Thom 9

Thank you!

Literally nobody
Literally nobody
Aug 23, 2024 5:11 AM

The ideological argument through the left/right political paradigm really is just Right( it cost too much and took too long)
Left(we need to remove barriers and hate)

aspnaz
aspnaz
Aug 23, 2024 4:56 AM

Billionaires are an interesting idea. When you look at where they make their money, so many of them are associated with government support, that you have to wonder whether the owners use the government to support certain startups, so that the investors can get into the startup at the beginning and see their investment grow massively.

You see it everywhere. For example, TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor) was actually started by the Taiwan government. They recruited some people to be the “founders” then provided financial support, political supprt etc. Of course, the people who invested at that first stage were then vwey connected, probably very wealthy, and now even more wealthy. The proles in Taiwan were not offered ownership, only the select few. The government then ensures that the company succeeds, if needs be by getting their diplomats etc to sell the company overseas.

You look at people like Musk and you cannot help but see similarities to TSMC. The US government wants to move into electric cars so it supports the founding of Tesla, provides huge financial aid to Tesla, sells Tesla as an American product across the world, even getting foreign governments to subsidise the purchase of the product in the name of saving the planet. Who were the original investors, because they did very well. You are not a member of their big club.

Same with spaceX, same with Google, same with Amazon etc. Look at the similarities and the support provided by government and it becomes obvious that these are both investment vehicles for government connected owners, as well as tools that the government can use for its own nefarious purposes.

Obviously, in the good old days there were some genuine billionaires, but again, look at how they made their money and most of them had massive government assistance. It is as if the “billionaire” is a private agent of the owners of government.

mgeo
mgeo
Aug 23, 2024 11:38 AM
Reply to  aspnaz

The oligarchy sets the pattern. Government spends public wealth on scientific and tech. research, testing that industry cannot do, clean-up, liability. Anointed plutocrats get the patents, concessions, grants, protections. The financial sharks gain from the stock market frenzy. Free market = Freedumb.

judith
judith
Aug 23, 2024 12:35 PM
Reply to  aspnaz

Apparently this is what In-Q-Tel is. The CIA private equity firm.

WZ2001
WZ2001
Aug 23, 2024 12:02 AM

X is a bastion of free speech, until you say something they don’t like.
Then its a big problem. Believe you me I know.
They’re no different from Twitter. It’s all a ruse.

Big Al
Big Al
Aug 23, 2024 3:31 AM
Reply to  WZ2001

Seems to be no different anywhere, including here and most political blogs. Which also seems to be the nature of the internet. What’s the difference in getting censored here or on Gateway Pundit or the anywhere on the internet. Nature of the Beast? Or something more insidious?

Sophie - Admin
Admin
Sophie - Admin
Aug 23, 2024 10:25 AM
Reply to  Big Al

You DON’T get censored here, even when you routinely turn up to complain about us.

Big Al
Big Al
Aug 24, 2024 4:14 AM
Reply to  Sophie - Admin

Well, you did not publish my second comment regarding automatically going into pending so my comment can be reviewed. So it WAS censored. And if all my comments are being reviewed, what is the purpose? It’s to ascertain if they should be published, which you evidently determined that my original second comment should not be. That’s censorship, face it. I don’t how you can say it’s any different. You’re being hypocritical and refusing to face up to what you’re doing.
Hey whatever, it’s your place. Just like it’s Musk’s place or Zuckerbergs place or whoever, that was my point, everyone is doing this on the internet and you are too. You can try to rationalize all you want, but that’s the way it is. I don’t think I even blame you for your censorship, but I do blame you for not recognizing/admitting it.

Sophie - Admin
Admin
Sophie - Admin
Aug 24, 2024 6:18 AM
Reply to  Big Al

99% of the comments here are not flagged. YOUR comments are flagged for the same reason TonyOpmoc’s are – because your content can often degenerate into OT spam. When you post genuine opinions your comments are published – as are Tony’s – even if they are critical of this site. That is NOT ‘censorship’ in any meaningful sense of the word

We have to deal with the fact there are many entities out there trying to make this comment space unusable and unreadable, and one tactic is to fill it with waffle, abuse and meaningless contention. Whether you mean to or not, you and Tony both contribute to this sometimes.

Eg – there are currently 9 comments from Tony in pre-mod mostly dealing with how his wife is a rock chick, a subject we feel to have been sufficiently developed at this point. He thinks he’s being “censored” when we don’t publish these missives. Do you agree?

PS – all your comments on this topic ARE here, but any further repetitions of the same claims will probably be junked.

Big Al
Big Al
Aug 23, 2024 3:34 AM
Reply to  WZ2001

I.e., pending again, to make sure my comment should be allowed, or censored. There is no other reason for pending. Not picking on OffG alone, like I say. It’s everywhere that accepts comments.

Jade Helm
Jade Helm
Aug 26, 2024 12:34 AM
Reply to  WZ2001

One doesn’t even have to say something they don’t like to get banned. I signed up for X a few months ago and was banned for violating their terms before ever even having a chance to post something or reply to someone else’s comments. They ignored my protests and requests as to what term or condition I had violated. I doubt that Elon Musk had any personal knowledge of my being banned and figured that there are still people working for X that are holdovers from the Jack Dempsey days. X reminds me of “Democracy Wall” that supposedly brought freedom of expression to Chinese intellectuals but brought about the arrest and imprisonment of several prominent Chinese dissidents.

Clutching at straws
Clutching at straws
Aug 22, 2024 11:25 PM

A thing that’s been concerning me for a time is the transmission of these “dictats”

How does this work ?

How are the messages sent from Davos to the NGOs, then to the governments, then to the ‘without fear or favour’ police forces and, ultimately, to the back of our skulls via a baton ?

I don’t think it’s email, snail mail or memos, so how is it done ?

Serious question, how is the worldwide crush on freedom passed down from the instigators to the enforcers……

And why, out of the millions who must be implicit, are there no whistle-blowers ?

Or is that the next act of the play ?

Martin Usher
Martin Usher
Aug 23, 2024 1:31 AM

In the UK the process used to involve something called a “D Notice” that was sent to publishers. The important thing about such notices are that they self-referencing — that it, while it bans discussion of Topic ‘A’ it also bans any mention of the notice banning the topic. I think there’s something similar in the US that uses ‘national security’ as the trigger. Here you can only push it so far so there needs another more informal yet more wide ranging mechanism.

Another mechanism is more a sort of Old Boys’ Network. This was discussed briefly at the start of Russia’s “Special Military Operation” and is a general understanding of editorial policy (as in “you’ll never work in this town again”). This has also been the bulwark against any meaningful discussion about what’s been happening in Palestine. When you do get such a discussion — typically because things have got so egregious that its difficult to bury stories — then it usually involves minimal stories with an emphasis on being even handed.

(Once you realize this you notice just how much our news is manipulated and just how slanted it is. Here, though, you’ve got to be careful because if you start drawing too many connections then you’ll be accused of inventing conspiracy theories!)

Clutching at straws
Clutching at straws
Aug 23, 2024 9:05 AM
Reply to  Martin Usher

I take your point.

I’m still amazed there have been no death bed confessions about 9/11, so to expect one over a minor thing like the destruction of what’s left of the free world is hardly surprising.

Elongated Muskrat
Elongated Muskrat
Aug 23, 2024 5:44 AM

The world is full of quislings and whistleblowers go to jail for 250 years…

Willem
Willem
Aug 23, 2024 7:08 AM

Question

‘ how is the worldwide crush on freedom passed down from the instigators to the enforcers……’

Answer (from the great Michael Parenti):

“The dirty truth is that many people find fascism to be not particularly horrible.”

Clutching at straws
Clutching at straws
Aug 23, 2024 9:12 AM
Reply to  Willem

So obvious when you think about it.

My little brain finds it difficult to even think of such a possibility.

I assume I’m not alone.

BuzzWordSmith
BuzzWordSmith
Aug 23, 2024 8:03 PM

Chatham House rules my boy. Nothing written down and nothing attributed.

Rob
Rob
Aug 22, 2024 11:15 PM

They are protected under section 230, yet people excuse them censoring and shadow banning because they’re a private company.
Ummm the phone companies are private and they can’t censor you and they have a similar protection.
What the fuck with this change the rules whenever they want cause the idiots believe it

Clutching at straws
Clutching at straws
Aug 22, 2024 11:10 PM

if we comply, we lose.

If we rebel, we lose.

If we refuse to comply or to rebel ?

Aethelred
Aethelred
Aug 23, 2024 1:28 PM

They lose, but we don’t win.

Pavel S
Pavel S
Aug 22, 2024 10:44 PM

It seems that ever since Musk’s like of an alleged ‘antisemitic’ Tweet he’s been replaced by a pro-Israel bot. He needs the oil to generate the electricity for the crazy AI future he has planned for us. Best stay on side with Bibi and Trump – the ear-marked Messiah.

Duncan Cragg
Duncan Cragg
Aug 22, 2024 10:35 PM

This is the most long-winded article KK has ever penned. Get back to terseness and impact!

James Robertson
James Robertson
Aug 23, 2024 5:24 AM
Reply to  Duncan Cragg

If you think this piece is long winded, I think you maybe spent too long on Twitter!

judith
judith
Aug 23, 2024 12:38 PM

I love Kit’s articles. Wish they were longer.