Announcing the Independent Media Alliance
Derrick Broze
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Announcing the Independent Media Alliance
Today we are thrilled to announce the creation of the Independent Media Alliance (IMA), a collaborative effort focused on promoting objective, fact-based media from a diverse team of journalists, podcasters, and writers.
Our emphasis will be on countering narratives currently being seeded within the “alternative” media space, including, but not limited to, the false two-party paradigm, hopium in politicians, support for imperial wars, 5th Generation Warfare, and Technocratic solutions to legitimate problems (digital IDs pitched as the “only” solution for immigration, voting fraud prevention, etc.).
The IMA will take several actions in the pursuit of this goal, including regular panels and debates featuring alliance members and guests; collaborative and joint investigations; and launching a new decentralized media network to host relevant content from alliance members. The IMA will also be partnering with decentralized video platform Odysee to ensure that the content cannot be easily censored.
The creation of the IMA was initiated by Whitney Webb of Unlimited Hangout, Ryan Cristián of The Last American Vagabond, and Derrick Broze of The Conscious Resistance Network.
Webb, Cristián, and Broze have invited more than a dozen journalists, podcasters, and media outlets to join the alliance. The current roster includes:
Hakeem Anwar, Above Phone/ Take Back Our Tech
Catherine Austin-Fitts, Solari Report
Jason Bassler, The Free Thought Project
Jason Bermas, The Jason Bermas Show
Catte Black, Off-Guardian
James Corbett, The Corbett Report
Iain Davis
Richard Grove, Grand Theft World Podcast
Kit Knightly, Off-Guardian
Hrvoje Morić, Geopolitics and Empire
Steve Poikonen, Slow News Day/ AM Wake Up
Charlie Robinson, Macroaggressions Podcast
Carey Wedler
“The online media landscape, despite the plummeting trust in mainstream media, has never been more weaponized and difficult to navigate,” stated Whitney Webb. “By pooling our collective resources and creating some new resources, the goal is for this group of principled independent journalists and content creators, who have proven themselves over the past several years as willing to challenge official narratives even when difficult, to be able to withstand the increasing pressures of disseminating adversarial content in an increasingly adversarial social media landscape.”
“We believe there has never been a more important time for independent, principled journalists and content creators to collaborate more than ever,” said Derrick Broze. “Together we have the power to maximize our reach and counter false solutions and narratives which are infecting the indie media and ‘truth community’.”
“At a time when objective, non-partisan media is under more attack than ever, and the two party illusion has never been more vulnerable, like the cornered animal it is, the system lashes out at those who try to change it. We can all sense the changing of the tides, and none more viscerally than the dying power structure desperate to maintain its power. This desperation has materialized into the rising threat of digital identification, social credit scores, and overall technocratic control, all of which are being forced upon us in hopes that it will stifle, if not completely snuff out, our growing awareness and rising resistance. Enter the manufactured State-serving Mainstream Alternative Media designed to usher you mindlessly into the technocratic panopticon. Whitney, Derrick and I decided to start this Independent Media Alliance to organize against this rising threat using objective, well researched journalism and collaboration.”
– Ryan Cristián
Stay tuned for our first panel discussions, and the launch of the official IMA website and Odysee portal.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Glad to see you’ll be using Odysee portal instead of You Tube.
Principled journalists don’t care where they live.
Derrick Broze?
Oh please, my aching sides…….
What is wrong with Derrick Broze?
Whitney, Kit & Catty – great! But one name sorely missing: the brilliant Miri Ann Finch. That impressive lady is always digging a bit deeper – The Ace of Spades! The Ace of Spades!
From your Link:
I came here because I was alerted to you by a podcast about the IMA. I’m bookmarking you!
Sorry – CATTE, of course…
***This is THE most important current story for the new Independent Media Alliance to show how effective it can be***
https://rumble.com/v5eqsit-the-rebel-thought-podcast-host-melissa-ciummei-11092024-health-bill-norther.html
I had asked this on another board…
Anyone know whatever happened to investigator Christopher Bollyn?
Wow! This is certainly one ugly comment thread! Some of that can be attributed to to the rightful skepticism of the Off-G community, and some to the fact that most of the contributors are from the US; but there are also a lot of new and unfamiliar usernames here in the comment thread casting ad hominem attacks against some of the “Alliance” contributors. I’d speculate that we have a mixture of what would be expected from a skeptical comment community along with a spattering of MI6/CIA/Mossad sock puppets trying to seed dissent among the Off-G community by casting aspersions.
There are a handful of names on the list of “Alliance” contributors that I’m not familiar with, but overall it’s loaded with people whose work I respect.
The attack on Derrick Broze as a self-promoter is kind of myopic considering that’s he, in fact, is currently promoting a live event that will soon take place in the UK.
For the person who asked why wasn’t David Icke invited, I would point out that Ryan Cristián has interviewed both David and Gareth Icke.
And let me specifically address the ad hominem attack on Ryan Cristián’s christianity. It’s simply not worth bringing up because Ryan is, as he likes to say, “irritatingly objective.” You’re attacking the man who puts out the best newscast in the world primarily as a one-man operation. His “Daily Wrap Up” is an unparalleled source of objective news. There are lots of things I could nitpick about: he’s given to repeating himself, he has trouble keeping audio from different sources at even levels, he uses the word “overlap” way too much, etc. But even with all those warts, he’s still one single man who puts out a better newscast than any other news outlet or agency anywhere else on the planet.
Good analysis of the various strands of contributors to this thread: Regular OffG Truthers welcoming a new Truther site; regular CIA/MI5 bots dissing a new Truther site; and weary old pessimists cowering before an omnipitent “they” who are “all in it together’.
Whiplashed !
Good for you. I’m not sold on a few of them names (won’t say which), but anything that has Kit Knightly, Iain Davis and James Corbett in the same place has got to to be worth a lot. Give em what for fellas!
4 days later and zero mention of the second assasination attempt. Working so hard to ignore it is too funny.
So, you’re here to try and get us talking about it are you. No one cares mate. We all know it was gobshite. Away with you.
Did you see my response to you in last article.
Exploding pagers and walkie talkies.
Tumbleweed.
What’s so newsworthy about a POTU$A being assassinated? It happens all the time.
“When I told them Rossini was dead they asked: “Who shot him?” — Oscar Wilde, My Impression of the U$A.
I think this is a potentially good idea. I am certainly going to withhold judgment until I see what this alliance produces. I assume OffG will continue their own independent work as well?
Go get em Folks!
So much negativity in the comments!
Must be over the target.
Fair winds and Following seas IMA.
Great idea. The only question is why not invite David Icke? It seems to me that the ridicule he received when he was the only guy on the planet telling us what was going on decades before your roster nominees, somehow makes you feel that he is just too far out there.
When he first started telling us what was happening, everyone ridiculed him. As it came to pass 99% of what he says has come true and the other 1% is up for serious debate.
You failed straight away!!! as your founding member Ryan is a christian and weve seen how this je£u$ grift has hackjacked the truth.
and regurgitating newspaper articles or twitter posts is not journalism.
and when did shilling appearing and working with CC MIC supposedly ex naval intelligence and GCHQ or CHD funded platforms become credibility …?
Independent means not funded by the oligarchy = establishment.
Today’s Independent fake media is funded heavily by the oligarchy = establishment.
Who are you referring to?
“Catherine Austin-Fitts, Solari Report”
The King Sized turd in the punch bowl. This is the “researcher” who once asserted, on one of her podcasts, with henchman/Renfield Richard Dolan, that US Gov had purchased the Moon (the Moon, moon, not a figure of speech) from Aliens.
Doomed to never-ending bullshit. Will no consortium of parapolitical researchers/ thinkers have the integrity and/or cojones to filter these mega-rich huckster-shills OUT of the conversation? Is this just chronic self-sabotage or something more… structured?
Everyone on that list is in the same club.
I asked this of another commenter earlier but I don’t know if he will reply, perhaps you will. It’s a simple question. I don’t necessarily disbelieve you but I do need to know what your source is. What is the evidence for every signatory of this project – literally every one? – being in a particular club, or being anything other than sincere and well-intentioned.
I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I hope you see that evidence is needed when such things are said, before they can be accepted as true.
Birds of a feather flock together.
I’ve researched the list. Seen how they function within a loose network. Researched numerous psyops, lies and hoaxes they perpetrate individually and collectively, whether wittingly or unwittingly. Noted, what they omit.
Study mind control methods, Tavistock, the Cult of Saturn, the world playbook, the contagion myth, Freemasonry, gematria, numerology, astrology, codes, tarot, fake history, the darkside papers, sacred geometry, the “law” versus natural law, the Crown Temple, etymology, the Hegelian Dialectic, secret societies, the black nobility, faux terror ops, occult symbolism in “the media” and the esoteric.
Qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent.
You say you have researched the list, could you share that research? It really might be very helpful.
I’m a little concerned when you say “birds of feather flock together”. I feel that could easily become McCarthyist and doctrinaire. People need to be assessed by what they do and say, not by amorphous things like who they may associate with, don’t you agree?
Likewise your remark that you assess these guys based on what they “perpetrate” (slightly loaded word?) “whether wittingly or unwittingly“.
Shouldn’t we draw a distinction between well intentioned people who unwittingly convey some error and those who are knowingly deceiving us? It’s a big difference after all! A huge difference!
If we cast out everyone who makes a single mistake or error pretty soon we’ll have no allies left at all, so please let’s not lump in people who might be mistaken with those trying to mislead.
Which brings us back to the evidence I guess.
Could you share what you have found that makes you confident these guys are all of bad faith? I think that’s the crux. We need to know this.
“Birds of a feather flock together”
Yes, this is, by no means, adequate proof. I’m qualified to “attack” Fitts because I took the time to listen to, time-stamp, and partially transcribe, one of her podcasts. And it would have been the most hilarious 2 hours I’d spent, in years, if I didn’t know that people, in large numbers, FALL for such a shoddy grift and send her money, and believe her cynically comic book narratives.
It’s more than explained and linked within my answer.
Since germ theory is a centuries old fraud, and OG and those on THE LIST never mention that there’s no scientific evidence for viruses, the fake germ theory or contagion, or that pandemics are an invented construct to promote poison injections called vaccines, hence (wittingly or unwittingly) promote those false beliefs and other Masonic psyops… such as Fake Nukes, or orchestrated faux wars, the faux countries psyop, faux genocides etc., plus all they omit (included in 1st reply) they’re limited hangouts: They fail all my litmus tests.
So, when you said you had researched the people on the list, is this what you meant?
I had assumed you had uncovered evidence of shady dealing or of connections with government or dubious NGOs. If by ‘researching them’ you meant collating their opinions, well, I’m sorry that isn’t sufficient evidence to claim they are all in a club or have nefarious intent.
Those topics you mention, such as germ theory, as I understand it the evidence is inconclusive and many people have differing opinions.
I don’t think I can agree that everyone who thinks differently than me on a controversial topic is automatically wrong and dishonest. They may just take an honest different view. They may even turn out to be correct and you wrong!
I don’t see the gain in being a Torquemada and policing your personal orthodoxy as you do. Why not embrace shared understandings and try to work together? OG did truly extraordinary work on covid and they are in my experience truth-tellers not ideology sales persons. Don’t they deserve our support for that even if you don’t agree with them on all things?
I mean why leap from ‘they don’t share all of my views’ to ‘they’re all in a club’?
I didn’t SAY anything. I wrote: I stated. It’s called logic, critical thinking, deductive reasoning. Research.
If a bunch of masons and controlled opposition Intel shills float your boat with 10% truth and 90% disinformation, enjoy.
Not judging by this thread of yours it isn’t. What you’re doing is making ad hoc lateral connections that make sense to you but have no syllogistic pattern to them. That’s the opposite of logic and deductive reasoning.
I mean what would your syllogism look like? –
‘X disagrees with me, all people who disagree with me are wrong, all people who are wrong are shills, therefore X is a shill’
Yup some deductive reasoning there.
Or how about
‘X is named Corbett, all people named Corbett are liars and shills, therefore X is a liar and shill’
Nailed it!
Not saying you’re wrong. Sometimes crazy illogical people can be brilliant and genius level intuitives. Maybe you’re one of them. But logical? Oh brother no.
Everyone has their pet ideas and blind spots. Sometimes it is very difficult to tell which of those are sincere and which are put on for deception. But if you have done “research,” I guess we know now.
Of the 22 topics you list I’ve written about 13 of them. So what are you talking about?
GMAMB. The Richard D Hall, masonic prosecution psyop. Just like the Alex Jones faux suit, CJ Hopkins’ faux prosecution, Reiner Fuellmich and his faux prosecution and Nuremberg 2.0 psyop.
Hall exposed nothing that wasn’t bleeding obvious. And what’s Hall doing allegedly spilling his guts to the BBC/MI7? None of it’s believable. Not the suit, the alleged following of crisis actors, the BBC “interview”, or the outcome.
These faux prosecutions and suits are staged to discourage people from doing their own research into govt. hoaxes.
11 downvotes and counting, whoa baby, over the target….
I was skeptical of Corbett when he was working with Sibel Edmonds (it was good when he subsequently called her out) and I’m skeptical, by default, of anyone with a large audience… who has somehow escaped the hammer. But I don’t need to “trust” Corbett; when his Info starts stinking I’ll move on. Thus far, no stink, and some extremely convenient aggregations (documentaries, even) of Info I already know. Corbett is very useful to my archives. Richard Grove, on the other hand, appears to be a Quigley-ite to a much stronger degree and, not trusting Quigley’s passions, I don’t trust Grove’s info.
Fitts is the most blatant shill/ huckster/ disruption-asset on that list and her inclusion in a New, Intrepid, Truth-Seeking Venture is a ridiculous, own-foot-shooting thing to do. I understand the reasoning (if it’s innocent) behind trying to build a “broad church” but the reasoning is wrong. Her numbers count as negatives, not as assets, as her high-powered bullshit machine keeps the Normies at bay and ensures the further Ghettoization of The Cold Hard Facts that everyone ought to know.
It’s like building a big boat, meant to sail the world, and bring a message of Peace to All, called PEACE BOAT... and one of the project’s biggest backers demands to fly a JOLLY ROGER next to the hemp banner… and you capitulate because… uh… you know… “everybody should be free to do their own thing, man…” … or reasons worse than that…
Mmm. Did you see this on JC? I don’t find him generally, to be credible.
Researcher, what do you feel this man is revealing to you about Corbett?
Do you as a rule automatically distrust people whose names are “in the peerage” (whatever that is assumed to mean)?
Is the author of the article, and are you, aware that there will be literally millions of people with the last name Corbett and that almost none of them will be related to peers of the realm?
Really, is this intended to be a joke that I’m not getting?
Other than that the man’s criticisms of Corbett resemble yours of OG – viz Corbett does not share the author’s opinions on certain points, which is deemed to make him suspect.
I suppose the point that Corbett used to be an editor of an online publication whose founder was allegedly a spook has at least some potential significance, though concluding Corbett must be a spook in that basis does strike me as premature.
And that is literally it for significant content.
I note quite significantly the author finds no actual fault with Corbett’s work, beyond disagreements of interpretation. He doesn’t claim Corbett has lied or been inaccurate.
So, he is tacitly admitting Corbett has in fact NOT done these things, and is therefore a decent, honest researcher.
So, why is he writing this strange smear in the first place?
(aside: I tend to avoid clicking dropbox links)
“Do you as a rule automatically distrust people whose names are “in the peerage” (whatever that is assumed to mean)?”
This “peerage” business, and the guilt-by-last-name trope, and spurious genealogical “analysis,” has all the earmarks of Miles Mathis’ branding. Mathis is a relentless propounder of IT’S ALL FAKE theory, whether or not it makes sense in a given circumstance.
Mathis is either a disinfo committee or a very strange kind of sincerely-lopsided intelligence.
No, it’s a GENERATIONAL cult. Which, is how one group over centuries, maintain control. Handing down their wealth and power over generations.
The G in masonry doesn’t just stand for Gnosis (occulted) or the Great Architect.
“Corbett is an award-winning investigative journalist who has lectured on geopolitics at the University of Groningen’s Studium Generale. He has also delivered presentations on open-source journalism at The French Institute for Research in Computer Science, at Ted-X-Groningen and at Rit-su-meikan University in Kyoto.”
If that isn’t a SPOOK with intel credentials, I don’t know what is.
Nobody died on 9/11.
There were no planes. There was no “attack”.
The buildings were hollow. And stripped inside.
Built from their inception to be demolished in a masonic occult ritual.
It wasn’t even a false flag, it was a staged, media event.
There’s no Al Qaeda. All terror is faked.
There’s no ISIS or ISIL.
And AE911truth is yet another govt. controlled opposition group.
What club?
What club ?
Can’t speak for Researcher, she gave links…
The club only takes, cannot give us anything.
but don’t go down the rabbit-hole, the psyop-hole fine
if you said nobody has been to space
that club
They came from never never land, thought they inherited the Earth, and that Jesus already died for their sins so yeah, you could say it was just chronic self sabotage.
Or you could say it was just a cruel joke, either one fits.
/G\ 👁️ /G\ Love your music:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38Nz5W540OE
Derrick Broze AKA “33” Performing Live at Amati Jazz Club
The obvious problem with this Alliance for Truth is that it starts from the wrong end — the bottom. It regards Truth (rightly) as a persecuted minority opinion in the EU$A. The correct end to start solving the problem is to start from the top and form an alliance which identifies and eliminates the cabal of Con-artists who run the EU$A.
Start in UK by eliminating former PM TB.Liar and current PM K.Stormer.
How?
That’s wonderful news. Whitney is one of the greatest alternative journalists out there. I mean, REAL alternative journalists. Thank you for staying independent and doing such outstanding work. 😍👍
“Enter the manufactured State-serving Mainstream Alternative Media designed to usher you mindlessly into the technocratic panopticon.”
Sigh. Tell me about it. In Germany right now, so-called alt-media has been captured almost entirely by gatekeepers, limited hangouts, manipulative narrative-controlling claquers, moles, disinformants – take your pick. Aside from one or the other commendable exception, you won’t find websites like Unlimited Hangout or OffGuardian here.
I am really looking forward to this alliance and its contributions. And thanks again for all your great work.
The problem with journalists who tell you how the world works, whether they are honest or dishonest, is that they do the thinking for someone else. In a decentralized world there may be some use to such journalists: fi it may be unclear to me, a person from the Netherlands, how people live in fi Vladivostok, so ask a journalist in Vladivostok how the world works (in Vladivostok).
But it is a centralized world where all is the same in Vladivostok, Netherlands, etc, etc.
That being the case, one can do its own homework on how the world works. Just step outside, go to work, supermarket, movie theater, fun park, football match, etc etc and all is the same everywhere. One only needs to use its own eyes, ears and mouth to draw his own conclusions. No need for interference by someone who is doing the thinking for someone else.
The conclusion that should be drawn: you draw it!
What remains to be told are anecdotes.
Agreed. We should all decide for ourselves what we believe. But I disagree that telling people what to believe is the purpose of journalism. For me, this is why I support the IMA.
In my view, the point of journalism is to investigate the evidence and report findings with a focus upon questioning power. Thereby, hopefully providing a service to people who don’t necessarily have the time to devote to that effort themselves.
It is then incumbent upon the reader of that journalism to make of it what they will. Some may decide to commit their own time to further investigate matters that concern them.Perhaps by reading more widely and considering other points of view. But without journalism there would be nothing for them to read.
So while I agree with your main point, it seems to me you have offered an argument for no journalism at all. Which begs the question, who will hold power to account?
Thanks for replying. And I agree with your definition of journalism, ie that it is not about what people should believe, but what is factual. My point is that for many facts you do not need a journalist, but you can use or own mind for deciding what is real and what is not.
Fi global political business is (mainly) in the end local political business. So if one starts there, there is plenty to see!
Have you found out who owns your local council? Court? Police Station? They’re all incorporated and privately owned. They aren’t public trusts.
The articles at OG repeat mainstream psyops, hoaxes and lies as if they’re real. Voting. Wars. Terror ops. Contagious dis-eases. Mass shootings. Politics. Geo-politics.
This is nonsense and you must know it.
Voting – We have been pointing out that elections are likely all rigged since 2019.
Wars – We have never endorsed a war or taken the avowed intentions of warmongers at face value.
Terror ops – Please see our work on 9/11 etc, and our recent publication of Iain Davis’ work on the Manchester Arena bombing. The idea we take a mainstream line on “terror attacks” is simply absurd.
Politics/geopolitics – The suggestion we take a mainstream line here is even more ridiculous than the one above. We have been calling out the hollow lie of party politics and geopolitics for years, in fact we are one of very few outlets anywhere currently prepared to question the sacred cow of the east-west divide, and we get a lot of flak for it.
The question must be why are you posting what you must know are lies and disinfo about our output? What is your motive for this?
Perhaps you can explain yourself.
Just out of curiosity: Why is this person not getting banned when other people get stowed away in permanent pending purgatory for the slightest criticism of you and your practices? What gives?
Same reason you aren’t getting banned for posting stuff like this.
So are you saying outlets such as this are not needed?
I would have to disagree with that since I come here, and places like Corbett report, Iain Davies, Edward Slavsquat, Edward Curtin, to get information I might not find very easily anywhere else, and also to read likeminded souls in the comment section. I think my life would be poorer without that and I’m sure I’m not alone.
💯👏👏👏👏👏💯
Kudos to Kit and Catte for becoming founder members of this potentially non-censorable Alliance of Truthers.
So, these are the people who are finally going to tell everybody in the “independent and truth media” what the real truth is. No more equivocation, no more hypocrisy, this is the fountain of truth. Well, that’s great. More power to them. IMO, “we” already know enough and continuing to try to spread the truth via the so called alternative/independent media about the daily and weekly events, particularly relegated to arguing over the minute details among mostly anti-establishment personnel, has negligible value at this point. So, what are they going to do? Run articles about why such and such at indie blog such and such is full of shit? And endless backs and forths while the ruling class enacts their global fucking prison? Reminds me of the coalitions after 9/11 and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, where a bunch of “antiwar activists” created a kind of cottage industry where they traveled around giving lectures and having conferences, charging 25 bucks a head, culminating in Occupy 2011, where it all died an ugly death. I got the distinct impression that it was another in the never ending human exercise of protecting the ole gravy train, i.e., doing what they needed to do to keep their livelihoods going. Same thing only different from the lapdog journalists in the MSM. They might think they’re immune, but they’re not. Money, i.e., “donations”, talk, bullshit walks. Of course, it didn’t make a bit of difference, because it couldn’t, and the wars didn’t stop, because they can’t. Just take a look at some of the names from those “conferences” and you’ll see most have been outed as the tools they have been and still are in most cases. I think there comes a point in all this where the most important thing isn’t to keep trying to “spread the truth” about what’s happening in the world, i.e., like the Jehovah Witnesses trying to spread their gospel to as many as they can, but to actively organize to overturn the system, i.e, form a revolution against the powers that be. Of course, that goes against the grain of this site so I’ll probably be censored for saying it.
Al, you make good points about The Light that Failed. Nevertheless, anything is worth doing that helps to spread the Good Seeds with their little kernels of Truth.
“Some fell on barren ground. Some fell on shallow ground and sprouted then withered. But some flourished, seeded and spread the Good Seed wider still.” — New Testament
There desperately needs to be a LOT more people out there thinking just like YOU are right now. And MORE importantly NOT AFRAID to stand UP and fucking SAY IT. The pathetic Powers that be, I.E the Globalists, rely on that fear to stand up for one’s self, one’s family, one’s community, and one’s Nation and peoples to get away with literally blocking murder and keep an entire world subjugated
But as soon as they get a platform and stand up and say it someone like you will call them a shill!
What on earth is the point? It would at least seem valid if you critiqued the claims being made or pointed out what your source for naming people shills might be. But this tearing down feels simply nihilistic to me. What is being offered in its place? Nothing, it seems.
I call people out as controlled opposition and chills when I see the signs. And they follow the same Play Books religiously. Because for the majority of the masses they work. For example Delphi technique. Generally having people come into groups like this and control conversations so they only go in certain directions and when somebody speaks out against those directions or offer something else then they are instantly attacked and shamed and usually a couple or several more people will jump in and put likes on that person’s attack Etc. That’s how you control conversations in groups like these all over the place. It’s the same thing that’s done in your local city councils to control the spending of funds. It’s the same thing done all the way up the chain to the top. Do I instantly believe that someone is controlled opposition or a shell simply because they have a platform? No that would be ridiculous. However, the powers the B out there on the internet. They own all the platforms that you use. All the newspapers. All the magazines. All the movie production and TV production. They control the very networks that are providing us the ability to have this conversation right now. And so for all the people who are attacked in their accounts deleted and censorship gone rampant, when you see one of these people who have accounts on platforms and they have millions of followers and subscribers and everybody knows who they are.. be suspicious. Pay attention. And take anything that is said with a grain of salt. That’s the same anywhere now. But make no mistake if they did not want what was said to be said that account would be gone and if they felt that those people were any threat to their multi-trillion dollar gravy train you would never hear a word from them again. And that’s real s***
Maybe it will reach those who do listen to corporate media, the people who do not know as much about the depth of the rot in ‘state of Denmark’ as OffG readers. As Yuri Bezmenov shows, de-moralisation is a key component, we can be discerning and still cultivate a positive future, well that’s my intention.
“Just take a look at some of the names from those “conferences” and you’ll see most have been outed as the tools they have been and still are in most cases.”
Memories are short, especially when they’re being crowded-out by the COOL NEW THEORY OF THE WEEK channels.
May we have a list from you please, of WHO has been outed, WHERE, based on WHAT evidence?
Is that too much to ask? I don’t like mob mentality or trial by hearsay, give me some facts and I might agree with you!
FACTS: https://icedrive.net/s/8A7z58gxD8RTkWfuSN8S513PFNT2
How many blindfolds do you wear?
TO PARAPHRASE
The most important thing isn’t to keep trying to “spread the truth” about what’s happening in the world but to formulate a revolution against the powers that be. Of course, that goes against the grain of this site so I’ll probably be censored for saying it.
Excellent summation. The spreading of the so-called truth, by virtue of its sheer volume and repetitiveness is wearing a bit thin and superfluous.
Overturning the system is the only way humanity will escape the dark abyss awaiting it.
This will require something special, something never seen before – a bloody good Counter Offensive Strategy:
Try this for purpose: https://icedrive.net/s/8A7z58gxD8RTkWfuSN8S513PFNT2
May you end up a lone wolf barking up a lone tree.
As far as I am aware, “telling” everyone “the truth” is not on the IMA list of priorities. I agree that arguing the minutia of daily events has “negligible value.” Thankfully, as far as I know, there is absolutely no intention at all to “run articles about why such and such at indie blog such and such is full of shit.” I don’t speak for anyone else, but personally I couldn’t be less interested in doing that.
As you say the “ruling class” is enacting its “global fucking prison.” Your “solution” appears to be that we should “actively organize to overturn the system, i.e, form a revolution against the powers that be.” How do you suggest we do that?
Again I don’t speak for anyone else in the IMA but I suspect there a considerable amount of sympathy for your position amongst them. I certainly agree with you contention, if I have understood it. Although, if it involves violence, count me out.
Before we take up arms against our oppressors perhaps there are a few things we should consider first. If we are serious about defeating the “powers that be,” that is, and not just blowing hot air against an enemy we have absolutely no comprehension of whatsoever.
The question I would ask you is what form of “revolution” should we engage in? Do you imagine that proletariat will rise up and seize power? How, will they do that, what will they do with that “power” if they ever manage to possess it? Who are the “proletariat”? Who is the enemy? How to they exercise power and what can we do to disrupt it? What is social and political power, who controls it why do they control it, what is their objective, can we stop them achieving that objective if we know what it is? If so, how do we stop them, assuming we know who they are?
Should we get hold of some tanks and some strike aircraft so that we can “fight” the “powers that be”? Will that work? Can we get hold of enough tanks and enough bombers to get what “we” want? what do “we” want?
What system are we going to replace the current “ruling class” system with, especially when their “war” is increasing hybrid and not kinetic. How do we fight such a war, what weapons to “we” have to defeat the propaganda and manipulation that is being used to control us. How do you fight a digital panopticon? Will smashing the state even work?
I know, let’s try to put something together with the express purpose of answering some of those questions, something aimed at actually fighting the hybrid war that is evidently being waged against us. At this point, that would seem more useful than parroting the same old tired and completely useless, inane revolutionary rhetoric that, to date, has brought to exactly where we are right now.
Although presumably, you would consider that a complete waste of time.
Maybe we should all just give up, resign ourselves to slavery, forget about trying to challenge the “ruling class” and just hope some sort of mythical revolutionary will emerge from digital dystopia to lead us to the Utopian horizon you seem to envisage.
Tell him Iain! You’re right mate. Good for you
What’s the operational theory of IMA? Is it based on the slow accumulation of influence until critical mass is reached, the spontaneous emergence of truth like the hundredth monkey, or the subtle, unseen force of the butterfly effect? Or is it something more akin to a cataclysmic, truth rapture?
Given the symptoms have been articulated and vectors identified, what is the source of the dis-ease? Where does it originate, why does it persist, and how does it reproduce? Is it sociobiological, genetic, synthetic? How does one engage with it—collectively, individually or not at all? Is it subject to birth, rebirth and dharma. Is it alien, human or a chimera H+? Is the goal to transform, dissolve or eliminate it? And where is true north, and what map best illuminates the path to wisdom?
Its probably neither, the real truth is too hard to stomach politically.
And the only reason the system survives is b/c it currently has a mechanism to forget, on a daily basis too, so to consistently remind the system also becomes distasteful and quickly angerly forgotten.
So place your wishes and hopes into the betting arena, and watch that arena.
WHAT A LOAD OF id BOLLOCKS.
Some claim you are a shill, but I do not really care.
All I know is that WE are being herded into Hell. Nothing you have written mitigates this directional force.
Revolutions don’t work, but the wonders of human ingenuity can work magic. Such magic with the support of Humanity will defeat the dark forces in play and lead to the creation of a world capable of keeping EVIL in check.
I base this on the rationale that I discovered recently: https://icedrive.net/s/8A7z58gxD8RTkWfuSN8S513PFNT2
Step 1 – We need to organize along class lines (then figuring out who the enemy is straightforward. We can consider the PMC to be our class enemies along with the oligarchs and their henchmen.
Step 2 – Organize, organize, organize! We need to organize everywhere in every community.
Step 3. – We develop a coherent analysis of what the ruling class has been doing to us over the last 4 years and going back. We need to understand the history the class warfare that has led us to this point. Collective reading/study groups of books like this one would be a good start: https://www.skyhorsepublishing.com/9781510779853/wall-street-the-nazis-and-the-crimes-of-the-deep-state/
Step 4 – Like it or not, we need to develop revolutionary theory. There’s a lot to be learned from those with experience. (Lenin for example. We face a huge problem here as Western Marxism has been so distorted by the CIA, that is is less than useless, it is part of the problem.)
Until there is a lot of us working together (at least in coalitions), we are fucked. We can work out the details along the way. But we need the basics in place so that the movement we build is not co-opted as every movement in West has been for the last 100 years or so.)
Those old Marxist tropes were getting tired in the 70s. If we ain’t organized now after 200 years of socialist theory, we are never gonna be organized. smell the coffee, the whole idea was put up there to be an unreachable goal we’d keep striving for and never reach.
RE:”…were getting tired in the 70s
.
Indeed they were. It’s worth knowing the history. The marxism of the New Left had abandoned the working class, class analysis and socialist revolution. It became the “compatible left” per Cord Meyer (high up in the CIA), a left that was anti-communist (think about that in relation to the guy who wrote the Communist Manifesto!), would be joined at the hip to the Democratic Party (the “2nd most enthusiastic capitalist party”), rabidly anti-USSR (opposing actually existing socialism), would regurgitate anti-communist propaganda like the worst McCarthyite and despised the working class. In a nutshell, Western Marxism became anti-Marxist all the while claiming to be Marxists.
This left could and did easily slide into Identity Politics and then more recently Woke Ideology. Both the aforementioned were top down/ruling class funded constructions and the left saw these as the social justice movement of “their time” to rally behind. The left today has become the global ruling class’ storm troopers. That’s how the “left became the right.” They serve the ruling class rather than challenge it.
Check this out, interview with Christian Parenti: “The Cargo Cult of Woke”
He covers the history of the left from the ’60’s all the way to Woke.
Agree. Moreover, the entrenched complexity of oligarchic slavery necessarily has a growing multitude of critical weaknesses: “holes in the dyke” of entropy.
Food for thought and I don’t have time right now to give a good response. I will say that the mentioning of violence and tanks, etc., is a tired, ridiculous and myopic comeback I’ve been hearing for a long time from lazy skeptics against actually taking on the ruling class. Maybe you can give up, but I will never. What a fucking ridiculous response in defending your money train. If you can’t see past the word “revolution” you just don’t get it.
Sorry, but… what guarantees does this “Alliance” offer that it will not be hijacked or infiltrated by those we already know?
I don’t mean to offend anyone, nor do I want to err on the side of pessimism. But in the last four years I have learned to distrust more than I did before, and these institutionalized dissidences do not exactly excite me.
Yes, dissidence has to unite in some way, that’s obvious. And one way to show that it is a genuine union, really devoted to find the truth about what is happening, whatever it is, is that it will accept to discuss in it absolutely ANY position regarding the events that have marked our present from the last century until today.
And among those positions are those that argue that 5G is a weapon and that viruses are not pathogens.
I, in particular, cannot be 100% sure that the latter two positions are true or false, only that there is a lot of material to debate there.
But, in the exposed list, there are people who are totally reluctant to address those issues. That is, they adopt the same attitude that the mainstream media took during the plandemic regarding, for example, RCPs and vaccines: they simply don’t want to discuss them.
And that, inevitably, makes me deeply suspicious. I’m sorry, but that’s the way it is.
Iain Davis is on the list, so we’re good!
Yeah and JC, our lord and savior is also on the list, ie the man from Japan who keeps giving solutions to us here on a weekly basis on how we can street dance ourselves out of this misery.
💯👏👏👏👏👏💯
There are international alliances to manipulate news for governments (Rapid Response Mechanism), MSM (Trusted News Initiative) and “fact-checkers” (Fact Checking Network). So, this new alliance can be good.
Or that you are a troll making sure a counter-narrative ever sees the light.
It is good that you are suspicious. We certainly all need to be. I am not easily given to joining causes and I certainly won’t limit what I say for anyone for any reason, other than my own sense of self respect. So allow me to express what I am suspicious of.
I am extremely suspicious of people who say that if you don’t agree with their opinion or don’t say what they want you to say that constitutes evidence that the person they disagree with is some sort of state asset or shill. On the contrary, not only does it not constitute evidence in support of that allegation it make me suspicious about the motives of the person saying it.
The last paragraph encapsulates your true credentials.
The concept is called critical support. You work with people on those things you agree on while having ongoing debates regarding those things you do not.
Enthusiasm plus intolerance could arise from (a) dogma, newly embraced (b) having forgotten the daily meds, or ineffective meds.
RCPs?
Reflected Ceiling Plans?
U need to be more specific then Bull Skying posting journalist names as an indication of success is telling. Every person I know is anti mainstream media, but MSM is funded by the tax deductible advertising revenue/expense paradigm. The owners of the MSM have the searching audience, the corporations want to reach their audience, so the media charges the corporations for access to their audience and the government subsidizes the corporations for their support of the MSM by making each advertising dollar tax deductible. . Alt media does not have much of an audience so it cannot raise much money from advertising. Alt media may have an opportunity to take the audience in one go, if only it would collectively team up with its audience and its providers to buy the Google Internet domain name and the Google owned search, content control, and audience access control algorithms which hopefully will soon be on the market.
Without the Google domain name, and the technology to support it, what exactly do you expect to accomplish.. what is your time frame? how much will it cost to accomplish that plan? How will you fund the trip? How will you stay out of jail ? This idea of your seems poorly thought out, count me out, at least until you get more, much more. If you need help contact me, i work for free if the idea and its people are any good. .
I think alt media ought to organize to buy the monopoly powers Google is likely to soon be ordered to divest itself of? Those monopoly powers include search engine domain name along with their audience matching to adverting technology, and search technology algorithms and storage and indexing technologies, user access gates etc.. .I think the thinking people of the entire world will help you raise the money but you need more than what you have shown here in terms of management expertise and ideas to provide the opportunity to take advantage of the ruling that Google is a monopoly. .
Journalist good, bad or indifferent ain’t the answer.. Delivering the full package of search monopoly power and access authority over the Internet is something worth trying to get and everyone knows it.
Here’s a crumb of truth I can’t believe they dared tell us:
FDA Approves Vaccine for Mpox — Warns It May Cause Death in Vaccinated and People They Come in Contact Withhttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-acam2000-mpox-vaccine-warning-death-unvaccinated/
That’s hard to believe when you hear it from some vain, stressy conspiwacy fruitbar on bitchute, but check the manufacturer’s website or drugs dot com – it’s for true! ACAM2000 and Jynneos both!
Hideously ironic that Oxford’s Jenner institute rest upon a history of Jenner’s FRAUD specifically regrading smallpox… and now we have ChAdOx1 ripped from the market withing months of it’s release – and Dame Sarah Gilbert is BARBIE!
This sounds like both (a) insanity, and (b) an admission of covid jab dangers.
From Through the Looking-Glass: “Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast”.
In Lebanon “You are being paged” takes on a new meaning !
https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/world/2024/09/18/pagers-explode-lebanon
More money needed..
I ain’t saying nuffink.
(Yes, I know it’s a double negative before the resident grammar policewoman chimes in.)
Much needed. I was wondering what the solution might be, let’s hope odysee can remain unscathed. Well done brothers and sisters.
Wow, sounds amazing. Can’t wait.
*Sniff sniff* YOU folks, all SMELL it, TOO? 🤔
Why an alliance? How is that decentralised? I dont trust Broze. Too much of a self-promoter. Love Off-G and James Corbett though.
It’s an Alliance, and by definition they will never gather only those you like. Just forget about this IMA and continue to follow those you like. Simple as that.
? why an alliance? cos they have a common goal. Makes sense to me
Indeed. A “new decentralized media network to host relevant content from alliance members”. Who deems what is “relevant”? How does one become an “alliance member”? Sounds to me like an attempt at consensus building.
Commitity.? panel.? who decides who is this baston of truth.
Relax
Let’s see if explained this way makes it more palatable for you: a group of friends online who share some common values putting together their resources to increase each other’s visibility.
If you have followed these people for awhile, you know they share some basic principles, agree on many current issues, and often disagrees on many others. But they still value each other’s work regardless of their views.
Makes sense?
“Love Off-G and James Corbett though.”
Agreed. Broze is bad enough but Catherine Austin Fitts is beyond awful in her blatant contempt, for the gullibility of her followers, as she turbo-shovels pure shit peppered with irrelevant-but-verifiable facts.
Here’s an even better all-star “Consortium”: Alex Jones! Jessie Ventura! Terrence Howard! Russell Brand! Charlie Sheen! Ron Jeremy! Rose McGowan! Julian Assange and Armie Hammer!