The Very Definition of Tyranny: A Dictatorship Disguised as Democracy
John & Nisha Whitehead
“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
James Madison
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Unadulterated power in any branch of government is a menace to freedom, but concentrated power across all three branches is the very definition of tyranny: a dictatorship disguised as democracy.
When one party dominates all three branches of government—the executive, the legislative, and the judicial—there is even more reason to worry.
There’s no point debating which political party would be more dangerous with these powers.
This is true no matter which party is in power.
This is particularly true in the wake of the 2024 election.
Already, Donald Trump, who promised to be a dictator on “day one,” is advancing plans to further undermine the nation’s already vulnerable system of checks and balances.
To be fair, this is not a state of affairs that can be blamed exclusively on Trump.
America’s founders intended our system of checks and balances to serve as a bulwark against centralized power being abused.
As constitutional scholar Linda Monk explains, “Within the separation of powers, each of the three branches of government has ‘checks and balances’ over the other two. For instance, Congress makes the laws, but the President can veto them, and the Supreme Court can declare them unconstitutional. The President enforces the law, but Congress must approve executive appointments and the Supreme Court rules whether executive action is constitutional. The Supreme Court can strike down actions by both the legislative and executive branches, but the President nominates Supreme Court justices, and the Senate confirms or denies their nominations.”
Unfortunately, our system of checks and balances has been strained to the breaking point for years now, helped along by those across the political spectrum who, in marching in lockstep with the Deep State, have conspired to advance the government’s agenda at the expense of the citizenry’s constitutional rights.
By “government,” I’m not referring to the farce that is the highly partisan, two-party, bureaucracy of the Republicans and Democrats. Rather, I’m referring to “government” with a capital “G,” the entrenched Deep State that is unaffected by elections, unaltered by populist movements, and has set itself beyond the reach of the law.
This is exactly the kind of concentrated, absolute power the founders attempted to guard against by establishing a system of checks of balances that separate and shares power between three co-equal branches.
Yet as law professor William P. Marshall concludes, “The system of checks and balances that the Framers envisioned now lacks effective checks and is no longer in balance. The implications of this are serious. The Framers designed a system of separation of powers to combat government excess and abuse and to curb incompetence. They also believed that, in the absence of an effective separation-of-powers structure, such ills would inevitably follow. Unfortunately, however, power once taken is not easily surrendered.”
The outcome of the 2024 elections is not a revolutionary bid to recalibrate a government run amok. Rather, this is a Deep State coup to stay in power, and Donald Trump is the vehicle by which it will do so.
Watch and see.
Remember, it was the Trump Administration that asked Congress to allow it to suspend parts of the Constitution whenever it deemed it necessary during the COVID-19 pandemic and “other” emergencies.
In fact, during Trump’s first term, the Department of Justice quietly trotted out and tested a long laundry list of terrifying powers to override the Constitution. We’re talking about lockdown powers (at both the federal and state level): the ability to suspend the Constitution, indefinitely detain American citizens, bypass the courts, quarantine whole communities or segments of the population, override the First Amendment by outlawing religious gatherings and assemblies of more than a few people, shut down entire industries and manipulate the economy, muzzle dissidents, “stop and seize any plane, train or automobile to stymie the spread of contagious disease,” reshape financial markets, create a digital currency (and thus further restrict the use of cash), determine who should live or die…
Bear in mind, however, that these powers the Trump Administration, acting on orders from the police state, officially asked Congress to recognize and authorize barely scratch the surface of the far-reaching powers the government has unilaterally claimed for itself.
Unofficially, the police state has been riding roughshod over the rule of law for years now without any pretense of being reined in or restricted in its power grabs by Congress, the courts, the president, or the citizenry.
This is why the Constitution’s system of checks and balances is so critical.
Those who wrote our Constitution sought to ensure our freedoms by creating a document that protects our God-given rights at all times, even when we are engaged in war, whether that is a so-called war on terrorism, a so-called war on drugs, a so-called war on illegal immigration, or a so-called war on disease.
The attempts by each successive presidential administration to rule by fiat merely plays into the hands of those who would distort the government’s system of checks and balances and its constitutional separation of powers beyond all recognition.
In this way, we have arrived at the dystopian future depicted in the film V for Vendetta, which is no future at all.
Set in the year 2020, V for Vendetta (written and produced by the Wachowskis) provides an eerie glimpse into a parallel universe in which a totalitarian government that knows all, sees all, controls everything, and promises safety and security above all comes to power by capitalizing on the people’s fear.
Concentration camps (jails, private prisons and detention facilities) are established to house political prisoners and others deemed to be enemies of the state. Executions of undesirables (extremists, troublemakers and the like) are common, while other enemies of the state are made to “disappear.” Populist uprisings and protests are met with extreme force. The television networks are controlled by the government with the purpose of perpetuating the regime. And most of the population is hooked into an entertainment mode and are clueless.
In V for Vendetta, as in my novel The Erik Blair Diaries, the subtext is that authoritarian regimes—through a vicious cycle of manipulation, oppression and fear-mongering—foment violence, manufacture crises, and breed terrorists, thereby giving rise to a recurring cycle of blowback and violence.
Only when the government itself becomes synonymous with the terrorism wreaking havoc in their lives do the people to finally mobilize and stand up to the government’s tyranny.
V, a bold, charismatic freedom fighter, urges the British people to rise up and resist the government. In Vendetta, V the film’s masked crusader blows up the seat of government on November 5, Guy Fawkes Day, ironically enough the same day that Trump won his landslide return to the White House.
Yet there the comparison ends.
So, while we are overdue for a systemic check on the government’s overreaches and power grabs, this year’s electoral victory for Republicans was no win for the Constitution.
Rather, it was a win for the very entrenched, hawkish, establishment power structure that has exhibited no regard for the Constitution or the rights of the citizenry.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, the Deep State works best through imperial presidents—empowered to indulge their authoritarian tendencies by legalistic courts, corrupt legislatures and a disinterested, distracted populace—who rule by fiat rather than by the rule of law.
Originally published via The Rutherford Institute
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
So, if the Democrats won, things would be different???
Australian Governments Misinformation Bill Dead In The Water.
https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/breaking-australian-governments-misinformation
This happened with the Australia Card as there was lots of pushback but they got the tax file number through. Perhaps that was always the intention at that stage.
Interesting they received pushback on this Bill but not the Digital ID Bill
The conservative talking heads openly discussed this and riled up people like my parents who don’t seem to realise they already reside in what is classified as “acceptable “ information 😬
In Australia, the Identify & Disrupt Bill legalises covert alteration, or a demand for such alteration, of online information including that in a social media account, if an enforcer “reasonably suspects” that an “offence is being, is about to be or is likely to be committed” -Jordan Brown, Alec Miguel & Jennifer Keene-McCann 2021
As an aside, I never saw an explanation for the strange phenomenon that in all global MSM there is daily an exact body count displayed for Gaza dead ( like 43,799) – tallied by Hamas/UNWRA and never anything clear for the Ukraine battle field, which has many more deaths.
The only count that matters:
– EU leaders.
So zero – the number of survivors planned.
The Hamas Health Ministry kept track of the deaths according to the identification of bodies compared to the register of their population. This is impossible to maintain now because everything has been annihilated, hence the numbers have been static for many months while the deaths have continued to climb. The true number will never be known, but is well into the hundreds of thousands now.
How do you identify someone buried alive under many layers of “pancaked” concrete floors?
You can’t. That’s why the true number will never be known.
If they dont collect their money as they use to do, its quite obvious they are dead and gone.
The definition of Tyranny.
It is ironic that this essay starts with a quote of James Madison. Let me give you another of his quotes,
“The system must have sufficient checks and balances to guard against majoritarianism (ie. Democracy) in order that the propertied few are protected from the propertyless masses.”
It is the second part of the sentence which carries the real meaning and purpose of the US Constitutional Government.
ISN’T IT WORKING WELL.
What we now have is worse than a dictatorship. At least with a dictator there’s a slim chance of his moral compass pointing the right way.
“Our Democracy“(c) gives 100% chance of wrongdoing. With no way to fix the saturation by corruption and infiltration.
Also in a dictatorship, (a) responsibility is focused (b) there is always a chance of a coup.
hey eric… maybe you oughta stick to movies and books, huh..?
A coup is a transition of power; you cannot have a coup to stay in power.
Sure, the selection was organised by the deep state, but it was not a coup. The deep state has been in power for decades, which is why the USA never changes course, only the rhetoric changes, the actions continue to follow the same plans. Both parties are doing the bidding of the deep state, there is no winner in the election, there is no good and no bad, Biden was the figurehead for the deep state over the past four years, Trump will now do the same for the next four years. The plans will continue, any apparent changes in policy will all be a part of that plan, the POTUS has no influence over anything other than the superficial issues that the deep state does not care to control.
This is very well and concisely stated. And Romans 13 is a more accurate description of how government really works than any constitution.
Rom 13:1-7 WMTH-JM 1 Let every individual be obedient to those who rule over him; for no one is a ruler except by God’s permission, and our present rulers have had their rank and power assigned to them by Him. 2 Therefore the man who rebels against his ruler is resisting God’s will; and those who thus resist will bring punishment upon themselves. 3 For judges and magistrates are to be feared not by right-doers but by wrong-doers. You desire –do you not?– to have no reason to fear your ruler. Well, do the thing that is right, and then he will commend you. 4 For he is God’s servant for your benefit. But if you do what is wrong, be afraid. He does not wear the sword to no purpose: he is God’s servant–an administrator to inflict punishment upon evil-doers. 5 We must obey therefore, not only in order to escape punishment, but also for conscience’ sake. 6 Why, this is really the reason you pay taxes; for they are God’s servants, devoting their energies to this very work. 7 Pay promptly to all men what is due to them: taxes to those to whom taxes are due, toll to those to whom toll is due, respect to those to whom respect is due, honor to those to whom honor is due.
It should only be seen in light of what Christ say:
Give to the Emperor what belongs to the Emperor, and give to God what belongs to God.
“Shovel the Doos into the oven, for Hitler didnt become ruler without God’s permission” yes??.
“Follow all Pol Pot’s Commands because the man who resist Pol Pot is resisting God’s will” yes??
Moses resisted Pharao, Lot resisted the Rulers of Sodom and Gomorrah, Noah resisted to idiots at his times, how?
By following the 10 Commandments only as these take preference over everything else.
the notion of checks and balances derives from the political philosophy of Montesquieu, I suppose, who like Hobbes and others of this period were preoccupied with the spectre of the English Civil War, whereby “Leviathan” argued against any division of powers on the grounds that it could provoke schisms escalating into armed conflict, while Montesquieu apparently hoped that an institutionalized framework for non-violent competition among factions would inoculate the system against such upheavals
since the US split into military camps at each other’s throats, just like 17th century England, within only a few generations of its founding in line with Montesquieu’s approach, the question really should be asked as to how valid and empirically justifiable our faith in his rapturous vision, so sonorously drummed into our heads by civics class teachers, should be, of a government immune to shocks thanks to its carefully calibrated stabilizing mechanism
but even beyond that doubt, there can be no dispute about the complete lack of attention given to the will of the broader population by those thinkers, drawn from the elite, who authored the American Constitution, and who certainly did not intend checks and balances to act as a any kind of brake on their elitist domination of the American masses, so it seems pretty naive to expect the separation of powers doctrine, no matter how conscientiously it might be upheld, to effectively curtail such continued domination
Good Lord, it took me a while to work out what “pronatalism” meant. What kind of person would even conceive the need of this word?
Presumably someone who thinks demographic replacement is the solution.
How do these people think immigrants are created in the first place???
But of course these are not benevolent people presenting serious arguments. They are destroyers of nations.
Sorry, replied to wrong comment. See Edwige’s post below.
The in-house rag of the Fabians finds a new angle to encourage depopulation:
https://www.newstatesman.com/comment/2024/11/the-disturbing-rise-of-tech-bro-pronatalism
Yes, it’s those nasty Silicon Valley types promoting pro-natalism – by which they really mean Elon Musk. Musk favours Trump = Musk favours something else = something else muct be bad.
What they don’t seem to grasp is that they’re breeding their own support base out of this world which will leave it to those demographics who keep having children… like Trump supporters.
Actually a Conservative run Government has shown within the U.K and E.U the oppsite in people wanting children.
You would of thought a Conservative run Government would of made it easy for young people wanting to be parents
however the 2 child limit, Mix age couples rules and savage fee;s for child care and cost of living has made the idea of family seem like a nightmare.
Which makes the UN definition of genocide very relevant.
Ugh. Bolding went awry. These parts are key:
” intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
…
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;“
“Checks and balances” is a nice, clean theory. It has little to do with reality. The Supreme Court’s power of judicial review was arrogated by Justice Marshall; it is not in the constitution. All branches were never supposed to be equal. The Congress is supposed to be supreme, above the judicial and executive. It was supposed to have the final word on everything governmental. It is, for instance, supposed to be the only branch that can declare wars. Look how that turned out.
A top judge gets to keep his job for life if he can say the right things during evaluation. What could go wrong? In the worst case, you may have to snuff him out with a pillow.
I thought OffGuardian was on the ball – you have lost the room peddling that nonsense that Trump says he is going to be a dictator etc and democracy lost – democracy would have been lost without him…
You guys forgot the usual babbling about the Police.
“Police tyranny, Police dictatorship, Police violence and Police state, disguised as a Police democracy”. Fixed.
I struggle to understand why off-guardian keeps publishing these rather long-winded and tedious commonplaces from the Whiteheads on a weekly basis. I feel certain every regular reader of this site for years, if not decades already, has been fully aware of the shocking fact that the US is no “genuine democracy”, but is run by a totalitarian deep state, so getting this repeated each week is like hearing 2+2=4 ad infinitum. As we know, ODs should be avoided…
I further register that the authors refer to “the COVID-19 pandemic and ‘other’ emergencies’” without inverted commas. Does that mean they believe there ever were such a “pandemic”?
I would not be surprised…
Nope. Read back on our extensive back issues re. our position on COVID. We were one of the first to break the pandemic fake.
It often varies per context and author, we don’t have a hard and fast house style, plus we host a variety of opinions by a variety of authors. A2
Dear Sam, I’m fully aware of your excellent site’s views on Convid, I simply cannot understand how my words could in any way be interpreted as a criticism of you – what I wrote was
Does that mean they believe there ever were such a “pandemic”? THEY, meaning, of course, the Whitehead couple.
The creation of the Fed has thrown them off on economic matters, this is no financial site, its a balanced administrative site.
Then you should direct your criticism directly to the Whiteheads as I do.
I find the Whiteheads too propagandized in their articles, but take it as an OffG variation which maybe can cause a valuable discussion about this side of the political specter. No big deal…………………..but.
Apparently, then, when the Founding Fathers set up the US Constitution, they had no idea there was such a thing as human nature. Otherwise they could not have seriously imagined a system of Checks and Balances among people belonging to the government bureaucracy would not be breached ever. The Executive, the Legislature, the Judiciary are all part of the same power structure.
The only conceivable Check and Balance has to come from outside the government. Power should be shared, but not simply among those already in the government. There should be sources of power apart from the government with an amount of clout equal to that of the government itself.
Yes, the Deep State is exactly that: it consists of bankers, military contractors, foreign lobbyists. Everyone gets in the act – everyone, that is, except the people themselves. The ultimate power of the purse should reside – and in fact because of taxation already does reside – with the people.
“No, we will not pay for this!” should be the absolute last word on anything the government proposes.
Everyone you listed follows the orders of the very richest through their investment concerns.
“England prevails!”
Anagram of Peter Thiel:
THE REPTILE 🦎
Exodus 21:6: “Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever.”
“Bore his ear through”…. sound like anyone you can think of recntly?
A proof from heaven that Trump will serve the American people forever. I told you but you refused to believe in anybody but Liberal hangovers.
No no no surely not.
No no no surely not.
They just throwing it in your face at this point. Along with photos of the new health czar and friends grimacing over a scumburger McDonald’s meal.
“…….policies that encourage vaccines for all Americans”. He says ‘encourage vaccinations in general’ only.
I always find it tiresome to work in negative, discuss something in negative, reject a lie or a postulate, reject a smearing campaign.
Isnt it a bit early you Liberal guys already started the foaming attacks on your hate objects; the people with just a little bit traditional views and personality? I find it pathetic.
Ed , your point being 🤔
about traditional views and personality
only if you believe the hype, lies and media circle.
By the way, Ive Never ever been a liberal.
and the traditionalist where all about the church and state hence why they was called values as in to the community = state + church = control.
This world consist of states yes? This world consist of churches in every little village on this planet yes?
So we have a civilisation called Family, God, King and Nation which is what we say is traditional (old fashioned conservative) values.
Then we have the Democrats, the Liberals. What is it they want? Anarchy, Ku Kluz Klan, slave trade, drug trade, child sacrificing, atheist society, LGBT “freedom”, living off grid, hippie culture, smoke the herbs.
Civilisation is when we each participate with each our specialisation.
A symphony orchestra is a good example of good old traditional conservative civilisation values.
Anarchy “freedom” examples you see in identity confusion, totalitarian societies where everybody is taken care only of themselves.
Church? Has participated to civilisation with ethics and moral rules. “Thou shall not kill”, “Thou shall not commit adultery”, etc.
This was and is my point.
Is that verified coming from or authorized by Trump? Can’t tell nowadays what’s real and what isn’t, but that would bring completely up to date his stance on the scamdemic. Which is not only interesting but very damning.
It would help if prominent figures didn’t have a team typing in “their” comments. We can never tell if Trump is referring to himself in the third person.
Make “From The Desk Of” Great Again.
The public health policies were indeed “incredible.”
Or is this another word that has been redefined this decade?
My post-election flicker of optimism is waning.
Democracy, Amerikan style = Rearrangement of The Furniture.
It’s always been that.
Already, Donald Trump, who promised to be a dictator on “day one,”
C’mon, like he told people to “inject bleach.”
I’ve stopped posting and been away from OG for awhile now, precisely because it appeared to me you’d begun really stooping, and regulary disallowing my hardly controversial comments.
Plus, somebody by the same name kept posting things that seemed easily confused with mine.
I just posted one to the article on state encouraged suicide, left “pending.”
I’ll be back later to see if both this and the other never made it.
Later!
We have a simple policy of popping first commenters in pending. If you wish to post in this community completely unimpeded, as in most places, there’s a simple contract of trust that must exist. Trust is earned, and we have no obligation to encourage unsourced, unfounded, undermining implications against Offg’s motives. We encourage freedom of expression and we have one of the most open comment forums out there.
Your opinions are welcome, and if you express them respectfully and well we’ll not run into each other much at all!
Things have changed a little since you were last here, perhaps. We encourage this community to take pride in itself, to regulate itself, to moderate itself, and to be kind, even when dealing with very difficult issues.
Please abide by this and our simple Comment Policy, and enjoy commenting. I’m going to keep you in pending a while, just for good measure, since we have a small team here and we have to play it a little cautiously or spamming/trolling quickly gets out of hand. Other than that, have fun and thanks for understanding, Sam.
OmG! Accusing Trump of all the media/lawfare the woke bureacrazy did themselves to his first term, while he couldn’t even start the second yet. Covid19 was trust on Trump from the outside, same as Russiagate.
Sure, he is no Messiah, but neither is Deep State the Almighty.
Don’t give Deep State an impassible Swamp stink, it doesn’t need your assistance.
Can you explain this ?
and how is this not woke alt right free speech censorship
https://x.com/i/status/1857493924601803160
Its only about Doos and Dooish discrimination.
Tiresome yes, but The World Dooish Congress obviously got very sensitive after been put under yellow star marks in the 1930’es.
Thus Trump’s little speech here is not the end of America, free speech and of all times.
Yes, it is. Free speech is the allowance of speech you disagree with. The freedom to say only what is allowed is no freedom at all.
There is no justification for antisemitism laws in any country except Israel, where of course it’s entirely up to them to have it or not.
In any other country the notion is abhorrent.
Give everyone identical protections. This solves all the problems without creating a protected supremacist class.
I agree absolutely with you in the principle. But there are some weird background behind this ridiculous Doo focus pint point.
I cannot find out whether its because that Rothschild’s own City of London and invested heavily in Israel (zionism), or something like that. It must be some ritual they make.
He IS the Deept State the Almighty.
They all are.