Australia’s “Social Media Ban” is Digital ID via the backdoor
Kit Knightly
Earlier this month Australia’s government announced plans to ban anyone under the age of sixteen from using social media.
Social media companies aren’t happy about it, predictably, and the kind of people conditioned to oppose everything social media-related are proudly cheering it on.
That’s how the issue is being framed. Social media/big business vs protecting children.
But that’s not what it’s really about. It’s really about digital identity and removal of anonymity.
Think about it – how do you enforce banning anyone under 16 from social media?
Well, you need everyone to prove their age before starting an account.
How do they prove their age?
Why, with a new Australian government backed digital identity of course.
Perhaps the one that was created by an Act of Parliament in May and is due to come online on December 1st.
This isn’t me spouting hypotheticals, they’re openly saying it. From Reuters [emphasis added]:
Australia plans to trial an age-verification system that may include biometrics or government identification to enforce a social media age cut-off, some of the toughest controls imposed by any country to date.
The plan couldn’t be more obvious.
Step 1 – Create digital ID.
Step 2 – Enforce its use via “think of the children” messaging.
…that’s it. It’s a two step plan.
To give them some credit, they might be playing a slightly longer game here. It’s possible the sweeping “no children on facebook or twitter” stance (which has come in for some criticism in mainstream papers) is a deliberately extreme policy intended to sell their true goal as some kind of “compromise measure”.
For example, maybe they’ll relent and say “fine, children can use social media, but everyone has to use Digital ID to end anonymity so we can monitor predators”…or something.
However it plays out, Australia is getting digital ID because oh won’t somebody PLEASE think of the children.
Meanwhile, in the US we can look forward to Trump putting digital biometric ID in place to “secure the border” and “protect the integrity of our elections”.
In the UK it will be about controlling immigration.
The EU is getting digital id to promote “efficiency and safety”.
And New Zealand is getting their own…just because they’re New Zealand and that’s what they do now.
It’s like that medicine in Mary Poppins. It might be different colours and flavours depending on whose taking it, but in the end it’s the same stuff coming out of the same bottle.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
There’s been a lot of celebration lately about Ausfailure dropping their “disinformation” bill, but not much about this (worse) one. Looks like running distraction.
Governments have no problem doubling down on what’s already being done. There is already more than enough spying on social media – and indeed, on e-mail and telephone – to go around; and the governmental minions already know at any given moment who precisely is doing what precisely.
Digital-schmital ID my Aunt Fanny. All that is, is something to make people think they’re not ALREADY being spied on. “So help us God we just might do this to you if we must!” the big bad Digital ID minions tell us. “On no, please, don’t do this to us!” we then beg – completely oblivious to the fact that ALL communications are already digital!
Anyone who carries a smartphone already is succumbing to digital ID…
Well, guess what the Fraud had only yesterday?…
https://dumptheguardian.com/media/2024/nov/25/violence-on-social-media-making-teenagers-afraid-to-go-out-study-finds
Perhaps they should just openly create a company called dial-a-survey.
And oh yes, everyone will be all for it because it is best for the kids, or best to control immigration, or just the best thing for all of us because no one has “anything to hide.”
The masses deserve this (and will take the rest of us down with their innocent, unconscious, obedience). It is so obvious what is happening, but it seems to take nothing to wrap the dagger up in colourful paper. Plunge it in yourself, folks.
As Esther Rantzen said to the kids. ‘If you have been abused use our confidential helpline). That way if you expose any of my BBC pedo colleagues we can get to you first