10

The Strait of Hormuz – A Very Strange Tug-of-War

Kit Knightly

Since the US/Israel began their war – sorry, their “targeted, limited, combat operation” – hard facts have been hard to come by.

In a more than usually cloudy combat narrative, we’ve been told that Iran is winning AND losing, depending who you ask. It’s a regime change war, but also it isn’t. Various Iranian officials have been killed, and some came back. Netanyahu was briefly dead, too. There was talk of a tactical nuke.

Nowhere  is this fog of war  thicker than in the Strait of Hormuz, about which it is seemingly impossible to get a *ahem* strait answer.

The coverage is so fast-paced and contradictory it conjures up images of an elaborate game of “yes, and…” being played by members of an improv group who have totally different goals for the story, and secretly hate each other.

Within hours of the initial bombing raids of “Epic Fury”, Western news sources were reporting that Iran had closed the strait of Hormuz.

Then Iran said they hadn’t, but they were threatening to.

Then Western insurers stepped in, forcing a closure in effect by refusing to cover ships passing through the strait.

Then Donald Trump said the US military would insure the ships, and offered them military escorts as well.

Then we were told that Iran couldn’t close the Strait, even if they wanted to, because their navy had been totally destroyed.

Then the press reported that Iran had mined the Strait with “about a dozen mines”, despite Iranian officials denying this entirely.

More strangely, even US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, refuted the presence of mines, telling a Press Briefing, “We have no evidence of that.”

Which raises an interesting question: If both the governments involved in this war say there aren’t any mines, who is saying there ARE mines? And why?

Who is overruling both the Pentagon and the Iranian Foreign Ministry? And why are the vast majority of the press accepting their word?

Unfortunately, if there ARE mines, the US Navy is in no position to do anything about them, since they decommissioned their four minesweeper ships in September, and then sailed them out of the area in January.

Given that Iran mining the Strait is a very obvious potential outcome of any conflict, one the US has likely wargamed  dozens of times in the last fifty years, this is “incompetence” so incredible it’s virtually self-sabotage.

Some politicians recently suggested they could use mine-sweeping drones to keep the trade line open, but the press shut that down immediately, reporting that “Mine-Sweeping Drones Don’t Eliminate The Risks For Clearing Hormuz”

So the press and politicians are engaged in a debate about the best way to remove mines that are not confirmed to be there, and that both sides officially state do not exist.

Meanwhile, Iran is offering safe passage through the Strait to ships from China, or ships trading in Yuan,  or just anyone who asks nicely. Which seems to suggest they are telling the truth about the absence of mines.

Which again raises the question of why the press seem so keen for those mines to be there.

All of these contradictions generate a list of pressing questions:

  • Is the Strait of Hormuz open or closed?
  • If closed, who closed it and how?
  • Why can’t the US Navy keep the Strait open?
  • Does Iran have any Naval ships left? Or have they been sunk?
  • Are there mines deployed? How many?
  • If there are mines deployed, could Iran offer safe passage as it is allegedly doing?

…all of which have either no answers at all, or multiple contradictory answers.

It seems clear that large sections of the establishment want the Strait of Hormuz closed, or at least to make everyone believe it’s closed. The broader strokes of “why” are obvious: Drive up prices, cultivate shortages and panics. Chaos. Even better, expensive chaos. The best kind.

But it also seems like Donald Trump and those close to him don’t want the Strait closed and are trying to insist it is open and can be kept open.

Hence, we can only suppose,  the back-and-forth claims  –

“it’s closed!”

“No, it’s open”

“Definitely closed actually – and mined!”

“Nope, open, open, open, open”

“Closed, closed, closed closed – mines everywhere…”

Two drivers fighting over a steering wheel, while the car manically veers and swerves back and forth.

This struggle over the direction of the story appears to be ongoing; just yesterday, Trump was pleading with NATO allies to help keep the Strait open. It doesn’t look like they’re going to help.

The press is even planning ahead by positioning for the economic impact of the Hormuz closure to persist past the end of the war.

The Financial Times headlines

Why Hormuz will haunt us long after this war ends

And goes on to say…

It is not in Trump’s power to reopen this vital sea passage by declaring victory and walking away. Instead his war with Iran — and the particular issue of the Strait of Hormuz — will define the rest of his presidency and may haunt his successors.

That is because the strait’s closure creates both an immediate crisis and a long-term strategic quandary. The current problem is that the longer it is closed, the greater the threat of a global recession. The future dilemma is that Iran now knows that control of the Strait of Hormuz gives it a stranglehold over the world economy. Even if it relaxes its grip in the short term, it can tighten it again in future.

Do you see?

In a move straight out of Wag the Dog, they have insured the narrative against  anyone, be it Pezeshkian/Trump/Hegseth/Netanyahu/ or anyone suddenly claiming the war is over and ruining the plan.

They’re telling us even if that happens, even  if the sides were to come  to terms and end hostilities, we’ll still be “haunted” by Hormuz and  “feel the effects of the closure” long after any fighting is finished.

That makes it very clear, doesn’t it?

It is vitally important to the greater narrative that the Strait of Hormuz is closed.

Possibly indefinitely

The question is what comes next.

Thanks for reading...

You can help us keep doing what we do. Every little helps and is hugely appreciated.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Categories: latest
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Elvira - Admin4
Admin
Elvira - Admin4
Mar 18, 2026 7:02 PM

We have had many problems today with the website. DDoS attack and then comments were not working for some hours. And now the voting is broken. We are trying to fix everything. Hopefully be back to normal soon.

George Mc
George Mc
Mar 18, 2026 7:05 PM

There is something extra weird about this latest media show. The entire Iran fixated narrative had a blasé and almost apathetic appearance without even any attempt at a Nayirah testimony type scam to whip up the public. No babies ripped out of incubators. Just a generalised stereotypical mass murder regime vibe. The rulers no longer seem to think they have to make an effort. Any minimal braindead meme generation will do. 

Is this what happens when an order have too much power and can piddle out any drivel they want? And I’m sure they’ll keep it going. Perhaps eventually the newsreaders themselves will yawn as they deliver the endlessly recirculating indifferently pasted riffs. 

EyeSpy
EyeSpy
Mar 18, 2026 6:43 PM

It’s pretty clear if you ask me that this is all theatre just to push agenda 2030. Iran is in on it too, I expect the last global leaders to defy the globalists were Saddam and Gadaffi, and perhaps some of those that were assassinated during covid, the rest are just controlled opposition.

KiwiJoker
KiwiJoker
Mar 18, 2026 6:43 PM

What comes next is wonderful:

  • Decentralisation due to collapse of global governance structures
  • Smaller farms requiring minimal mechanisation and artificial fertilisers
  • Localisation of food production requiring minimal transportation
  • Communities helping each other prosper sustainably
  • Recalibration of the debt system away from fiat currency
  • A simplification of human existence
  • The energy systems such as those developed from Viktor Schauberger’s work becoming commonplace…

Loveliness

EyeSpy
EyeSpy
Mar 18, 2026 6:47 PM
Reply to  KiwiJoker

Or a one world government, the NWO and the digital panopticon. Don’t get me wrong I believe the things you propose will come eventually, but I expect it will get a lot worse before it gets better

Pilgrim Shadow
Pilgrim Shadow
Mar 18, 2026 6:48 PM
Reply to  KiwiJoker

“And then he woke up.”

Republicofscotland
Republicofscotland
Mar 18, 2026 6:40 PM

Iran doesn’t need to mine the Straits of Hormuz, it has hypersonic missiles – ask yourself why there not a US naval warship within 700 miles of the straits – Trump knows fine well that any US navy ship stupid enough to try and escort targeted oil tankers through the straits, will end up at the bottom of them.

There were reports that one of the US aircraft carriers ( I can’t recall which one) had a laundry fire, at first it looked like a cover up on a strike by a missile, now the story is that the crew started the fire – because they’ve been at sea so long they want to go home, they’ve missed weddings, funerals, child births etc, but that has been denied to them, and they will have the unenviable record in the coming weeks – of being the longest US aircraft carrier at sea, post WWII.

Elvira - Admin4
Admin
Elvira - Admin4
Mar 18, 2026 6:17 PM

testing

Stooge
Stooge
Mar 18, 2026 5:04 PM

They have announced proudly and loudly that US troops are going to invade Iranian islands. That they are invading at all is questionable. But that they telegraph it so far ahead of time. I think that that ties directly in with this whole fishiness thesis.

EyeSpy
EyeSpy
Mar 18, 2026 6:50 PM
Reply to  Stooge

Most likely just fearmongering propaganda, like how the psyop in Ukraine was going to go nuclear and turn into WW3. They got what they wanted out of the Ukraine psyop and they are getting what they want out of the Iran one too. The threats of escalation will continue for as long as people keep believing them