Non-existent “Super Flu” hits the US.
Kit Knightly
Just before Christmas, I wrote an article on the so-called “Super flu” that was breaking out across the UK, headlined simply:
Experts agree: There is no such thing as “Super Flu”
Even the most cursory of actual reading of mainstream sources made it quite clear: there is no such thing as “super flu”.
The current flu season is no more severe, widespread or deadly than usual, and there was no reason to suppose the incipient flu season would be anything other than entirely normal.
An assertion supported by the latest NHS graph:
This particular anti-climax doesn’t signal the end of the propaganda, naturally. Rather, they are course-correcting; praising the use of “digital tools” to “modernise the NHS” and cheer the number of flu shots distributed, and crediting a combination of the two with averting a potential disaster.
But as the “super flu” wanes in the UK, it waxes in the US.
Which is funny, because we were told that “super flu” was a totally unofficial term informally adopted by the NHS in internal memos…and yet it’s now being used all over the United States as well (here, here and here for example).
It’s almost as if pretty much all the Western (or even global) press receive their talking points from the same source. But we all knew that already.
The wrinkle here is the calming voices from more “sensible” or “expert” outlets. As the Daily Mail shrieks:
‘Super’ virus spreading uncontrollably… as New York sees most flu cases ever and experts warn ‘we don’t know when it will stop’
…we have articles from GAVI and The Sanger Institute pouring oil on the water [emphasis added]:
“Superflu” is not a scientific term, and based on current evidence, there’s no indication that subclade K is any more dangerous than other H3N2 influenza viruses currently circulating, said Lewis.
Why? I couldn’t say for certain, there are a few interconnecting issues potentially in play, but I would guess the biggest issue is a reluctance to undermine faith in the flu shots, which are supposedly out there saving millions of lives.
It’s the eternal struggle of the propagandist, balancing the looming threat with the omnipotence of authority. The rising crises must be at once terrifying and yet within the power of the state to fix…given enough power and tax revenue.
Oh my god! We’re all going to die, but also everything will be fine if you do what we say.
Time ticks over, 2025 fades away and 2026 springs up to take its place, but the mainstream media remains a dully repetitive cycle of manipulative contrivance and dishonesty serving an entirely unnatural and anti-human agenda.
Happy New Year, everyone!
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Claims there is ‘widespread antisemitism’ in Australia is a government
endorsed and spread conspiracy theory…
Governments are great spreaders of conspiracy theories…
The BBC ‘Superflu’ Contradiction.
https://principia-scientific.com/the-bbc-superflu-contradiction/
🔴 The most striking points of the “COVID-19/7700 I want to remain human! Bio-digital convergence” document are those that emerge with the greatest clarity and impact, both in terms of emotional weight and the severity of the accusations:
1. Accusation of intentional genocide
• One of the most serious allegations concerns the alleged deliberate population reduction through vaccines, citing 2017 intelligence documents predicting a drastic decline in the UK’s population (55 million victims by 2025), framed as an intentional attack using “biochemical weapons.”
2. Criticism based on scientific studies
• The document references thousands of scientific studies and official records, including materials from government agencies like the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency), reporting severe adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines—such as myocarditis, thrombosis, infertility, and other serious conditions.
3. Hidden sterilization and contraceptives in vaccines
• A detailed and hard-hitting section accuses vaccination programs (e.g., tetanus vaccines in Africa sponsored by the WHO and the Gates Foundation) of containing contraceptive substances, leading to forced infertility in millions of unaware women. This is presented as a grave abuse, a human rights violation, and a crime against humanity.
4. Historical failures of vaccinations
• The document cites documented cases of severe side effects and inefficacy in past vaccination campaigns (e.g., smallpox and Spanish flu), challenging the very principle of mandatory or mass vaccination.
5. The heroic figure of the unvaccinated
• The rhetoric portrays the unvaccinated as morally and symbolically significant—heroic resisters who withstood immense social and institutional pressure, casting them as protagonists in a narrative pitting the courageous individual against an oppressive system.
6. Bio-digital convergence as a threat
• The merging of biology and digital technology (transhumanism, technological control over bodies) is framed as an existential threat to human freedom and natural biological identity, emphasizing the risk of a society dominated by invasive tech.
7. Call for free and viral dissemination
• Another key point is the explicit appeal for unrestricted, widespread sharing of the document’s contents. The author waives copyright, urging global circulation to mobilize public opinion worldwide.
PDF: 1959 p. ⚠️ UPGRADE: 01.01.2026 https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/svg/1f1fa-1f1f8.svg
▶️ Download:
https://www.calameo.com/accounts/7564957
https://drive.proton.me/urls/11TT50C4ZG#MddrJhq1lTHh