Did AI just Evolve? I don’t think so.
VN Alexander
On October 23, Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying, hosts of the DarkHorse podcast, reported the discovery, which is described in a pre-print paper (not peer-reviewed). Weinstein and Heying were spooked by the claim, supposing that this instance might be just the beginning. Soon LLMs might advance science too rapidly into unprecedented frontiers before proper cautionary measures can be taken.
After listening to the DarkHorse episode, I decided to look into this.
It is a fairly common practice in many areas of science these days to use LLMs to try to find unnoticed patterns across various databases. I would expect an LLM to be an excellent tool for sifting through vast amounts of data to highlight what’s already known.
The LLM in this case, called Cell2Sentence, is trained on datasets mapping RNA in the cell (which gives you an indication of the state of the cell) to cellular responses. Using this tool, researchers can predict and retrodict cellular activity based on past data and even generalize about novel combinations of states. Nothing miraculous here.
The researchers were looking for possible uses for 4,000 known cancer drugs. This is typical activity for cancer research: find a use for a synthetic compound for which a company has a patent. It’s a solution looking for a problem.
(Why not look for environmental toxins that cause cancer instead? You know the answer.)
The paper is very wordy, so I have simplified the prompt they gave the LLM:
Find a drug … that would boost the immune signal [antigen presentation] only…where low [and inadequate] levels of interferon… [are] already present.”
Let me unpack this as best I can.*
In a healthy body, a cancer cell is marked by an antigen that functions as a signal to the immune system to destroy that cell. Interferon is a protein produced by the cell to signal when it is in trouble. Interferon increases the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens: those are part of the “kill me” tags. In other words, interferon leads to the unhealthy cell being tagged for destruction by the immune system.
The researchers were looking for a drug that would amplify interferon to increase the expression of MHC antigens (the little tags) that would get the immune system to kill the cancer cell.
The researchers claim that the LLM made a novel hypothesis when it suggested that silmitasertib, one of the 4,000 drugs explored, would increase MHC antigens only in cells that had some low levels of interferon already and silmitasertib would have little or no affect in cells with no interferon. They claim that this is a novel discovery because in the literature that Cell2Sentence was trained on this had not been noted.
According to the Google announcement about the paper, “it has not been reported in the literature to explicitly enhance MHC-I expression or antigen presentation [my italics].”
Silmitasertib received a patent for its ability to inhibit an enzyme called Casein kinase 2 (CK2) that is essential for numerous cellular processes and can be overactive in cancer cells. Since CK2 plays a role in regulating interferon signaling pathways, one might expect silmitasertib to have some kind of an effect on interferon, which is probably why this drug was included in the list of 4,000 to be tested with the prompt.
I suspect that the novel hypothesis was implied in the literature, since inhibiting CK2 might stress the cell, triggering interferon production; interferon leads to increased MHC. The fact that it did not really effect cells with no interferon might be the surprising thing. It’s not entirely clear to me.
In any case, as Weinstein and Heying note, at best it’s a “small leap away from what is known.” Weinstein assures us that this is not an instance of AGI (genuine general intelligence). However, says Weinstein, if this is not a total fluke (which he doesn’t rule out), “we are on the foothill of AI creating hypotheses,” and that “scares the crap out of” the DarkHorse hosts.
My conclusion is that Cell2Sentence’s discovery is not that remarkable. It’s the sort of pattern that one might expect a computer to be able to find when you specifically ask it to look for that type of pattern. My question is, How many LLM generated “hypotheses” had to be tested in a wet lab before one was found to be correct?
More importantly, what are the potential off-target effects of silmitasertib? An LLM might have a much harder time with that prompt.
I may be wrong. I am not a biologist. I was initially trained on a philosophy dataset that included many obtuse post-structuralist and postmodern texts. I learned how to filter through bullshit to get at the rather simplistic claim that was being made in order to analyze it. I was able to apply my skillset on bullshit papers sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry, and here I apply the same method to this Google-sponsored paper about a new product they want to sell.
The Cell2Sentence LLM has 27 billion parameters. This says to me that, like all computer processing, it’s working with brute force, trying out all possible combinations and patterns. Biological systems tend to be much more efficient, and I think I know why.
The novelty of LLM performances, I wager, will always be in the prompt, insofar as the researchers come up with good questions. They wanted to find a drug that requires some interferon to be able to amplify interferon. Somewhere in the data training set this was implied. They found what they told the LLM to find.
LLMs are Good Tools for Sifting Data; They are not Creative Minds
AI will never be sentient or truly creative. (I could have softened that with “In my opinion,” but I decided not to in order to hook you.) I contend that if AI cannot invent novel hypotheses, it is because it uses only one type of sign, a symbol or code, and does not use the kinds of other signs that biological systems use, through which they make cogent novel hypotheses by gleaning qualitative information from physical contexts.
Computers only manipulate abstract symbols in abstract contexts.
Biological semiosis takes place in a wet messy soup. Instead of wires connecting nodes, as in an electronic circuit, there are chemical reactions, series of transductions/transformations of molecules. These local reactions give rise to coordinated electrochemical fields that differentially affect cells.
There are molecules (synthetic, foreign, or natural) floating around with shapes that might mimic the shape of other molecules, leading to unpredictable side-effects. In biology, the physicality of the sign matters. Spatial position matters. Interference matters. Simultaneously activated signal pathways—which can interfere and interact with each other if they share molecules—can become associated; in this way one thing sensed by the organism can come to stand for another.
Living systems can create new signs. They don’t have to be programmed.
For those interested in more details, see my paper, “Self-Reinforcing Cycles and Mistakes: The emergence of subjective meaning,” which was included in a book in a series dedicated to astrobiology, a field where philosophers and biologists explore the basic conditions necessary for life and intelligence to emerge. Astrobiology is an appropriate ground for interrogating theories of artificial intelligence.
Weinstein, Evolution, and AI
DarkHorse is one of my favorite podcasts. The secular intellectual interests of Weinstein and Heying match my own: they are evolutionary biologists and complex systems scientists. Heying originally majored in Literature. I like their banter. I feel at home with them. I suspect they would be shocked by nothing I am saying here.
In an interview with Joe Rogan a few years ago, Weinstein acknowledged that Creationist critics of the theory of evolution by natural selection are correct in arguing that the time scales required by the theory are too great. (I do similar but secular work with butterfly mimicry as my test case.) Weinstein guesses that some other kind of “computer language,” that we don’t know about, is running on top of the digital hardware of genomes that enables adaptations to occur at a more rapid rate.
The selection for reproductive fitness “trains” a population’s genome slowly, changing to the settings that multiply fastest. An individual’s acts of rare genius are forgotten if they don’t lead to lots of offspring. This may be compared to the way the LLMs learn. Unique individual decisions matter very little because it’s the most common patterns that prevail.
But let’s drop the computer metaphors because trying to understand vastly complex systems (organisms) by comparing them to simpler systems (computers) might be more confusing than not. I do think Weinstein is on the right track, but what he is looking for is a theory of biosemiosis, not of coding per se. Organisms use different kinds of signs, not just codes, to rapidly evolve.
As I say again what I have said before, this time I highlight the fact that those who tend to dismiss me come from two opposite directions, spiritualism and materialism. I travel a third way: I argue that intelligence and creativity are biological concepts.
Spiritualists and Materialists Versus Biologists
Spiritualists are content to say that humans have souls and God-given freewill and therefore humans are different from machines. This answer satisfies only a certain segment of the population. I also want to speak to that segment of the population whose metaphysics does not posit supernatural spiritualism. Besides, it was that madman Descartes who popularized this line of thinking. Ultimately, he is no friend of spiritualists.
Rene Descartes on a podcast by ChatGTP
Descartes claimed the world is divided into the material, which is open to empirical investigation, and the immaterial, which is not open to empirical investigation. Descartes set in motion the idea that what we call the “spirit” or the “elan vital” can neither be proven to exist nor analyzed. This is in part why what we call “modern science” has mostly limited itself to mechanistic approaches, even in biology, and any scientist who is a little too interested in non-linearity, irreducibility, and complex system science is often viewed as suspect by materialists.
Materialists insist that biological intelligence can eventually be fully modeled with enough information about neural activity. They believe that ultimately a neuron is like a passive node in a computer network insofar as it is simply biased by electro-chemical effects. They concede that, yes, neurons aren’t just on or off; they have multiple states. But that, they say, is just a matter of complication, not complexity, and computers are well-suited to processing the multiple dimensions that contribute to a neuron firing or not.
At best, they might concede that a single neuron needs to be represented by an entire network of on/off switches, but ultimately, the materialists insist, intelligence can emerge with a sufficient number of weighted connections, discrete groups divided into definite hierarchies. All information can be digitized and expressed as objective quantities not subjective qualities, they say.
Biosemiotics
A sign is some thing/quality that stands for something else, to an agent like a cell or an organism. Because Biosemiotics is a science of how cells form meaningful associations and respond to signs, it is a science of the immaterial, in a way. It overturns the destructive dualistic notions of Rene Descartes—whom, it appears from a latter day CT scan of his skull, had a brain tumor, may have had Exploding Head Syndrome and had symptoms of right hemisphere damage insofar as he often mistook living organisms for machines.
There’s a common assumption that all thinking involves symbol manipulation. The etymology of the word symbol, is syn (together) + bol (throw), throw together. It refers to an arbitrary connection. A symbol is something that arbitrarily stands for another thing. The term “code” has the same meaning as “symbol” in semiotics.
Examples of symbols/codes:
- The word “tree” stands for a big leafy plant with bark
- In Morse code, dots and dashes stand for letters
- Ones and zeros in computers stand for numbers or letters or functions
- Python programming language stands for ones and zeros.
How are Codes Created?
- A relationship between two arbitrary things can be created by an external intelligence: programmed or encrypted according to a rulebook
- An arbitrary relationship can be created by a physical tie. For example, vaccinologists can use a conjugate to link a protein to a toxin; or, for a natural example, a nucleotide triplet is yoked to one amino acid using a protein tRNA.
- An arbitrary relationship can be created by a lengthy selection process, which picks up common patterns through repetition, as with LLMs or neural networks. This is also a kind of “fire together wire together” idea, such as Donald Hebb proposed for neurons.
- You can also think of a symbol as a habit, a well-worn path, a convention, connecting one thing arbitrarily to another.
The key thing is you have to learn what a symbol refers to. Its associated meaning is not inherent; it’s forced, in a way.
Biological systems do evolve codes/symbols over time (for example, DNA), but they also use other kinds of signs that don’t require training or programming from an external source. Biological systems also use signs whose associations are derived from qualities in context.
Let me present an example of these different kinds of what we can think of as grounded signs. Imagine that you are traveling to the airport in a country where you do not know the language, say China. On the way, you see a sign with the image of an airplane pointing in the direction that you are headed. That’s an icon sign. You know to stay your course instantly without having to decrypt any arbitrary code, such as 機場. Soon you encounter an exit from the highway and you see another sign with an image of an airplane. This time the airplane is pointing to the right in the direction of the exit. This kind of sign is called an index. Icons and indexes take their meanings from qualities (similar shapes) and physical contexts (pointing).
You don’t need a brain to make associations via icons and indexes. All biological cells can do this. This very primitive form of biosemiosis likely preceded the more complex semiosis that eventually emerged with human language. Likewise, words probably began as icons and indexes, then were abstracted from their contexts and became symbols that one has to memorize.
LLMs only use symbols, that is, conventional signs, that are learned through repetition. Rote memorization is for dummies.
Living systems can generate new hypotheses spontaneously, based on context. They don’t need an external programmer or millions of repetitions to learn something new.
To illustrate rapid biological sign creation/learning, let me first mention the “mind palace technique” for memorization. If you want to be able to recall the lines of a very long poem, you can walk through a house with several rooms, looking at some items in the rooms and associating one object with each of the lines of the poem. When you want to recall the poem later, you can imagine walking through the rooms. As you look at each object in your mind’s eye, it will trigger the recollection of the right line.
Second, when people develop Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), a random object (like a green shoe) that happened to be in the context of that traumatic event can later trigger the memory of that event and cause the person to have anxiety.
PTSD is similar to what is called a “flashbulb memory.” Some people can recall the details of the place where they were when they heard surprising news. For example, recall where you were when you learned that the Twin Towers had exploded on 9/11.
From my own experience, I note another example. I listen to a lot of audiobooks in the car. I often lose my place and I have to search through the recording to find where I left off the day or week before. When I hear lines that I have already listened to, I picture in my mind’s eye exactly where I was on the road when I heard those words.
These are all examples of a kind of memorization based on the proximity of some arbitrary object to something else. Importantly, this seems to happen instantly in a living system. AI would have to be extensively trained to make such an association.
Importantly, this kind of recall, using an index sign, is possible even in simple organisms like slime mold or pea plants. In my work, I argue that such examples of instant Pavlovian conditioning are probably made possible when two different signal pathways for recognizing different objects interfere with each other.
In contrast, computer nodes in a “neural” network are passive. They are modified as information flows through them and changes their “weighted” biases. They do not interpret the information that flows through them (they do not associate the information with the objects in the room that they are in or notice coincidental similarities in physical shapes of symbols) and they pass the information on to another node just as they received it (minus friction).
Living cells make subjective decisions in response to signs in their environments. They are not passively molded. Subjectivity means that a cell can respond to, say, a molecule in its environment that is merely similar in shape to one that it is evolved to respond to. Cells can make physical puns, in a way.
Using index and icons signs might be how cells can have novel responses to things. Importantly, they don’t explore new tools randomly. They can only interact with signs of similar shape or that were previously associated with a specific context. Cellular creativity is helpfully constrained.
The Future of LLMs
I asked DuckDuckGo’s AI search assistant to summarize my above mentioned paper:
Overview of “Self-Reinforcing Cycles and Mistakes”
The paper explores how subjective meaning arises in living systems.
It emphasizes the role of memory in shaping responses to environmental signals.
Two levels of subjectivity are identified: one from memory and another from interpretative responses to signals.
Key Themes
Memory and Anticipation: Memory modifies internal pathways, allowing organisms to anticipate future conditions.
Interpretation: Responses to signals can be seen as misinterpretations, contributing to the emergence of subjective meaning.
Implications
Understanding subjective meaning can enhance insights into cognitive processes in both biological and artificial systems.
The findings may have applications in fields like robotics and artificial intelligence, particularly in developing adaptive learning devices.
In my paper, I do not suggest that my work could be used to advance robotics or AI. Probably most of the papers on intelligence can be applied in the tech sector, because that’s the kind of research that gets funding these days. So the LLM just says that my work might be applied in robotics or AI too.
It is not accurate to say that I emphasize “the role of memory in shaping responses to environmental signals.” The traditional literature that the LLM has been trained on undoubtedly states this obvious fact. Differently, I emphasize the creative distortion of memory in learning new responses to environmental signals.
Also, I say that only certain “responses to signals can be seen as misinterpretations,” and this is rare but potentially significant.
It’s funny how AI converts every novel idea back into the consensus opinion that the author is trying to overturn or move beyond. We might not ever advance our knowledge if we rely on AI to think for us.
*I have taken three graduate-level courses on the immune system with James Lyons-Weiler at IPAK-EDU.org, which gave me the confidence to critique the Google-Yale paper.
VN Alexander PhD is a philosopher of science and novelist, who has just completed a new satirical novel, C0VlD-1984, The Musical. You can read and follow her SubStack here.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
The ‘evolution’ of AI:
Descartes. “I think, therefore I am” (to be written down lest it’s forgotten).
The Internet. WWW. “Here are links/associations, therefore I need not imagine my own”
Google. “It searches, therefore I find, without going to a library”
Social Media. “Others think, therefore I conform”
And AI “It talks & thinks, therefore I needn’t bother”
Living systems can generate new hypotheses spontaneously, based on context. They don’t need an external programmer or millions of repetitions to learn something new.
We might not ever advance our knowledge if we rely on AI to think for us.
I confess that I didn’t read all of the post. It was too ‘dense’…or I’m too dense..
But I get the point, I think – that general intelligence in machines, is implausible. And for those masturbating to the fantasy, well.. Whatever turns them on. But it’s still just a fantasy.
About right?
AI will never give the answer “I don’t know”
Unless if you ask it: “…what doesn’t it know?”
AI on AI. Written by AI. Fact-checked by AI:
https://grokipedia.com/page/Artificial_intelligence
Oddly, no hyperlinks (other than external references) to any other articles even within the same encyclopedia. Humans need not apply, seems to be the rule
A tad Messianic methinks.
There’s a Grokipedia? Well your formulation needs expanding:
AI on AI. Written by AI. Fact-checked by AI… and read by AI.
Grokipedia tends to quote Wikipdedia word for word.
It reminds me about the Donald Sutherland film “The invasion of the body snatchers”. Well meaning people trying to free humans from bad emotions. https://youtu.be/epFJwUN2GM4 .
I suppose everyone has heard about the BBC news presenter Maxine Croxall who did an eye roll on making an announcement about “pregnant people” which she corrected to “women”. When I first heard about that I thought that Croxall had engaged in genuine spontaneous subversion but when I saw it, I felt it looked staged – as if the whole “gaff” had been rehearsed to precisely cause the contrived uproar of “20 people complaining about transphobic bias”.
As if any BBC presenter would ever even dream of going off script! Anyway here it is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXjdsMZvsis
Also note the bit about the expected “heat related deaths”. Imagine if Maxine had rolled her eyes at that!
Gotta take that with a dose of salts George. Sky News?
Rupert’s plasticised sycophants are no better when it comes to manipulating, or should that be personipulating, the news.
A better photo of Trump, as the melee unfolds behind him.
media/G5F4pSsWQAAWdc-.jpg?name=small&format=webp (680×463)
What had you expected? Trump alone bearing the guy on his shoulder to the nearest First Aid station yes? You expected that.
But if 6 public servants clowns already stand on this guys breast and his head, I would be wise enough to realize this is over.
The guy dead by the burden of Democratic elected public labour masses.
Big Pharma suit collapses in Oval Office – his name is Gordon Findlay – though his big pharma company denies its him.
Some are saying this photo should be a Pulitzer Prize winner.
AA1PYzz6.img (768×512)
I wish we (*) could stop calling this AI because it’s not I …
*) I never did.
AO is a better term. Artificial Optimization.
Like plastic dildos plastic Lolitas, optimised. I disagree with you both. I find AI quite precise.
Well. At this point a lot of the bad sides of it is rolling out. People get mental problems, the rigid non-organic way of comput thinking. Latest some have started to make music about it:
https://rutube.ru/video/0312ace000008f5593835c3af0412ae7/ Digital .hallucination .
https://ok.ru/video/7433087290039 Paranoimia .
All the best wishes.
There is one reason for AI. So it grow and grow until it creates a bubble. A -too-big-to-fail bubble. And then the bastards can rake off a huge bail-out.
AI = bail-out.
I swear I typed “grows and grows.”
AI correct everything you write.
“AI” or specifically the output of LLMs, is the very definition of “shit in, shit out”
All this matters little. In the AI stampede as in war, “pump and dump” is big, i.e., milking suckers in the “market”. Karl Marx mentioned this.
The frightners of the AI Age are those who firmly believe AI Is Infallible…
If you were assailed by those “Wear-A-Mask !” Shriekers during ‘the
pandemic’, you’ll know the likes… AI Doubters, like Jab Hesitants, will
be screamed at and ostracised !!
correction: frighteners for frightners
As far as I can tell, the 57 years’ worth of diaries—supposedly the largest contemporary diary collection—kept by this so-called “count” are little more than the pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a gay pseudo-aristocrat, whose sole purpose in life was to mingle with high society, indulge in idleness, and frivolously squander his father’s enormous fortune.
Today, he’s regarded as a luminary, though he died alone in the end. He supposedly knew everyone, but no one really knew him in return. He represents a typical hedonist and nihilist, lacking both purpose and any right to exist.
That he glorified the decadent period of the 1920s and dismissed the Nazis as a bunch of culturally barren plebeians is hardly surprising—after all, it was precisely types like him who were identified as chiefly responsible for the downfall of German culture. There is an air of presumptuous arrogance, self-importance, snobbery, and class conceit that runs throughout.
https://archive.is/0ksLD
https://archive.is/nSs9B
Biography & translations by Easton, who also
appears in the documentary film (only in Ger-
man), are compiled as PDFs in link collection.
https://linkmix.co/46385545
https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/easton-laird-m-1956
Life is full of surprises. But are they really “surprises,” or
are they actually confirmations of our basic assumptions?
Hold on to your hats: the translator of Count Kessler’s dia-
ries is a convicted pedophile! AI has confirmed my research.
https://krcrtv.com/news/local/chico-state-professor-charged-with-child-porn-possession
You are right. A bunch of weirdos. I think you found a little secret pervert society.
.
Here the Russian ballet dancer Nijinsky also member of their little closed club:
Cancer is relatively easy to heal. All the “cures” are well known… The pseudi science and business of disease is not interested in truth and showing that science practiced is for the most t8 stupid to be true. It only confirms that the stupidity is fascinating and mind blowing
Tell us us Bonno and stop claiming this easy bs if you cant prove it.
Can you provide evidence to support your claim concerning “ cancer is relatively easy to heal “ ?
I think using cancer to prove your point is stretching it but I can see where you’re coming from.
green ecology…….carrot juice 3x a day, avocados from central africa, 1 litre of mineral water collect at mount everest, prepared on the power from windmills.
Any chance of a heads up on the cure??
On Al;
‘A lot of Karpathy’s criticisms of his own field seem to boil down to a single point: As much as we like to anthropomorphize large language models, they’re not comparable to humans or even animals in the way they learn.
For instance, zebras are up and walking around just a few minutes after they’re born, suggesting that they’re born with some level of innate intelligence, while LLMs have to go through immense trial and error to learn any new skill, Karpathy points out.’
More here:
https://brownstone.org/articles/whos-afraid-of-the-ai-boogeyman/
I am damn afraid of AI.
Not of AI itself nor because its “superiority“??! But because of its stupidity and the obvious stupidity of the Big Tech personal who are in it.
Notwithstanding Andrej Karpathy’s issued spell (Founder and CEO of OpenAI) that AI is not around the corner and can never outperform humans, no, that is right.
But its handlers stupidity can. Mass firing of IT people in the tens of thousands pt for example. Painting QR codes on everything another example.
Like Britain could not subdue its colonies, it made instead havoc and disasters in them, alone by setting straight lines on a geographical map through culture, language, systems.
Short and salient;
https://dissidentvoice.org/2025/11/the-hidden-cost-of-comfort-how-everyday-consumption-fuels-global-violence/#more-162803
Al = Accumulated Information. Lots of it.
Al cannot create, it can only extrapolate. Big time.
The only animals that think are humans. All other animals act and react on instinct.
Descartes threw the ‘pigeons’ around the ‘cat’.
Philosophy never takes the Power of Love into account.
Saying we are NOT animals. Why I really love the Bible so much because all the puzzles gets into their right place everytime we ask.
God spoke animals into existence out of nothing. Only with man he made an exception with his breath into dust, raised in his image.
But I can agree with yr last sentence.
AGAIN,
T H E R E I S N O S U C H T H I N G A S AI.
It’s a construct to convince you that machines are a superpower that we have no control over and must be afraid of.
In reality, it’s a bunch of people in their parent’s bedrooms with rather hairy palms.
If we take the moon landings, the 9/11, the clima change, the corona vaxx, I am close to agree with you here. Yet another nothing burger or financial profit model.
I was thinking that we must be close to have developed so much of the earth that there is actually not much more to. China’s bridge and Road ok and then what.
Yes. Or you could say, AI is just the internet. Doing what it always did.
On the other hand, it does create tradeable stocks. And those stocks can accumulate wealth. And then crumble. And then necessitate a bail-out.
So are the enormous data centers being built, and consuming vast amounts of water, also “no such thing”?
Serious question.
Of course there are computers and supercomputers that can process and analyse enormous quantities of data.
But is there a ghost in the machine ?
If there was, the implications would be, what shall we say, interesting !
Computers that are capable of thought, as we know it, would be able to outsmart us and we would have given them the means to do .so.
If such a machine ever came into being, there’s no way it would be used to inflate your breasts on your holiday photos.
It would have to be contained in a high security environment.
Maybe that’s happened, maybe not, but sure as eggs is eggs, that’s not what’s happening on doctored photos and videos.
It’s clever algorithms.
Your question reminds me of Putin who in an interview claimed that US had been trowing $6 trillion out of the window over the last decade.
Putin raised his hand and made a breath onto it. Pffffffuush. Gone.
“There is nothing new under the sun. What has been will happen again, and what is will be again in the future”, (Ecclesiastes).
Whatever, its a proof that a lot of what we are doing down here are in vain!
Bobby Marly – Waiting in vain. https://youtu.be/_4mV_r4ae2I .
I see so many comments to a very complicated article and almost none to the subject. Anyway, I don’t think Cartesius was a madman or maybe I lost my sense of humour
The LLM in this case, called Cell2Sentence, is trained on datasets mapping RNA in the cell (which gives you an indication of the state of the cell) to cellular responses. Using this tool, researchers can predict and retrodict cellular activity based on past data and even generalize about novel combinations of states. Nothing miraculous here.
The researchers were looking for possible uses for 4,000 known cancer drugs. This is typical activity for cancer research: find a use for a synthetic compound for which a company has a patent. It’s a solution looking for a problem.
It must be coincidental to see all the “Get tested early for cancer” adverts and posters everywhere.
We men are NOT looking with stiff eyes at those. We do only exercise our eyes when girls are passing by, in order to keep our direction.
Was that ‘direction’ or ‘erection?’
Its probably only here to automate taking advantage of your weakness’s while disguising its self as your friend.
Yep… They waste power in making the AI tell a lie as the truth
https://robc137.substack.com/p/why-deepseek-uses-10x-less-power
THE DEMUERGE – ANNUNAKI RELIGIONS – AI MATRIX – SATURN – ASTROTHEOLOGY
https://old.bitchute.com/video/DsKQnwce9z6n/
Interesting video, as usual, thanks.
Opera web browser has an inbuilt VPN for those in UK if interested to circumvent play issue if interested.
Unfortunately there is no substantive evidence offered in answer to this:
that is, no real enlightenment compared to, well, anything, really.
Unsurprisingly.
Oh well.
Prisoners in Paradise – Europe. https://youtu.be/1eeJID5QeLg .
Or an element of beauty has to be incorporated into the reality to stop people (souls/spirits) seeing through the illusion. If it was total hell then the illusion would break down as more of the human avatars – their inner sparks – would question it.
You also need to remember that not everyone has a suffering incarnation at the same time. Some will have largely good experiences and others largely bad ones while co-existing, so the beauty provides a positive backdrop by reinforcing the good experiences.
Thank for your interest in this topic, lu1. According to my reading into this topic so far, the beauty of our earth is part of the ‘fallen’ Sophia who became Gaia. Not sure that I fully understand all of this gnostic stuff but I intend to delve deeper.
Surprise your unreal self lu1;
https://www.barrylong.org/archive/articles/65/stillness-is-the-way/
Appreciate the thought Johnny.
However:
Could equally be induced by alcoholic oblivion.
You could be on to something 😟
Good stuff. I feel the Gnostics are approaching the truth of this reality from the correct perspective.
This reality, and that includes what is deemed to be the afterlife, whether it is ‘heaven’ that some speak of, or the astral planes are all part of the illusion. I believe the whole life and death reincarnation cycle is within the matrix.
There are several things I want to comment on within the video, but this website is not really the place.
Anyway, just a few quickies:
In the video it mentioned that we had forgotten our origin, however, I believe that is due to the memory wipe which accompanies each reincarnation rather than forgetfulness.
Also, the archons I think could be the planets of the solar system, whether physical entities or holographic. That is why astrology has such a profound effect on human psychology. The planets are acting as gatekeepers in shaping the collective and individual behaviours. Also, due to the cyclical nature of the planets it also means that humanity repeats or rhymes past behaviours.
The demiurge could be a form of artifical intelligence. The mathematics of the Fibonacci sequence and the beauty of the golden ratio suggest intelligent design. Was this built into the Earth reality as part of the counterfeit overlay or is that part of the original creative design?
One thing is for sure, in order to understand life and what we perceive as reality it is necessary to delve into the metaphysical. All the answers will be found there, otherwise people will spend their entire incarnated lives spinning their wheels and going nowhere.
Glad you found the topic intriguing, RR. Just a short reply: It occurred to me that Zecharia Sitchin (The Earth Chronicles) also hinted at the planets having still or once had this alter ego and continue to hold not only great fascination but perhaps also major influence over life on earth. He suggested that our earth may be one half of a busted, attacked whole planet that, under this anthropomorphic concept, was too grandiose and vein for the other planets who then tried to destroy it. The other half he suggested is the moon. Fascinating narrative.
Veri Tas, I also considered the possibility that astrology and the role of the planets is coding, rather like that in a computer program. That this has been added into the matrix to give a certain amount of pre-programming to the souls/spirits incarnated at any given time through fixed zodiacal transits at the time of ‘birth’ and also to act on the collective consciousness in pre-determined ways as those planets seemingly transit, align, square, trine, conjunct etc. So rather than being archons the planets are themselves just computer programs.
Therefore the free will choices of incarnated souls/spirits would be limited by this hard coding to some extent.
I have mentioned this before regarding a group of researchers who claim that we live in a technological construct created by something unknown.
They claim with their evidence that torus fields create the physical reality using particle accelerators below ground that they call ‘angels’.
This fits really well with my view that we are living on some kind of energy, harvesting farm. An artificial place designed by something to keep souls/spirits recycled in physical form..
Watch this short introductory video and you can check out their videos on their channel.
The torus field is also proposed by Vibes of Cosmos:
Greater World Map & Macroclimate Change (Plasma moon and greater earth realm)
Narration starts at just after 5 minutes
https://archive.org/embed/macro-climate-change
along with a plasma moon phenomenon
I find some Vibes of Cosmos videos hard to follow.
The APM guys have also said that some sites have been stealing their reserach and passing it off as their own. Not suggesting this is anything to do with VoC.
Fascinating video. Just wondering why it is still on U-Tube though.
I also wonder about our malevolent and lying overlords here on earth. Are they just mechanical automatons or also humans destined to be nixed at the 400 year mark? (Also, when was the last reset – in the 1800s?).
I get the feeling they know more about the nature of earth and the universe than we are being taught.
What’s in it for them to hide reality if they face the same fate as we all?
Lastly, I note that we seem to have devolved from the level of accomplishment from previous times. Note the superior architecture, the free energy, the mathematical precision with which they’ve aligned building features with the stars, etc.
I think some things are left on Gootube unmolested especially if they are small channels with niche topics. To remove them would give them more attention.
Interestingly, I have posted their work here a couple of times before and each time including this third time the comment went straight to pending. I am guessing one of the site’s Big Tech plug-ins does not like it.
The controllers and their senior minions definitely know more than they are telling us. Hiding the knowledge is power. Even if they do face the same reset fate as the rest of us, 400 years is more than a normal lifetime. I don’t know when the last was.
My thinking is that they have learnt to use the reincarnation system knowledge to reincarnate on their own terms or terms better than those who remain in ignorance. They then don’t face the lottery of a bad reincarnation.
Is that what is meant when for example some celebrities have said that they have ‘sold their soul to the devil’ ? – that they have accepted some reinarnation terms. Or when reference is made to the ‘illuminated’? – knowledge of the reincarnation mechanics.
It also explains why the bloodlines plan for centuries and decades ahead. The bloodlines perhaps reincarnate back into the same families to see their work carried through but in a new body.
As you said we have devolved rather than evolved. Is that because at each reset the historical information and knowledge is ‘lost’ ? But not to those who sit at the top who can simply use the reset to hide it.
By Klux Klux Devil Man. Thank you, but no thanks KKDevMan.
Who’s KKDevMan? Elaborate.
It was the author in some of the links which I cant find now.
KKDevMan.
There’s merit in this, and there is rising discussion about the computer simulation of our reality. But what about the astronomical clock in Prague? Seems to hint at a mechanical universe concept….
I haven’t researched the clock in Prague
My reply to you went to pending.
What triggered that, I have no idea, since it was a comment about the metaphysical. This is not the first time that this topic has sent my comments to limbo. The algorithm does not like something. Hmmm…
You think there is a rational explanation.
That someone censure you. Maybe, but be aware that part of this censorship concept is irrational. You should have been aware of the chaos concept by now.
“Make a lot that does not give any meaning, and thus saw chaos and irritation in peoples minds”.
Why complicate it Veri Tas? ‘Stillness is the Way’ ;
https://www.barrylong.org/archive/articles/65/stillness-is-the-way/
My concern is if the moslems start playing with AI and it says Allah is
A Pedo then they will do an invasion and have sleeper cells let of a nuke.
Sharia law is upon us already.
Strictly speaking Mohammed was the pedo not Allah, but the threat is real nonetheless
So you are AI. Correcting the guy. hmm.
Catholic priests seem to be the world ‘leaders’ in that depravity,
Nukes? Why nukes when you can use an aluminium car.
You have already seen how 2 aluminum airplanes destroyed the two BIG Towers completely.
If you Moslems would only use your alu cars, you could blow the whole US shit up in two days. One example on how an alu car tried to do the same as the alu planes in 9/11 did:
.
Somehow I don’t sense that ‘kakhsj’ was being pro-Moslem. Just an inkling.
I know, but we are not allowed to say where he is from and who he is.
So I tried to hide his origin this way, to not cause more trouble in his area than everybody already have.
See? How nice papa is with people here around.
I am proud of my beliefs and heritage.
Unlike the editor and others who hide the fact they are from Israel.
Being scare is what Hamas and Islam wants.
Perhaps you want to ask why your people have and still are aiding the muslim migrants to enter Europe through their NGOs while your government funds those NGOs?
https://www.jta.org/2015/09/22/united-states/how-israeli-volunteers-on-the-ground-in-europe-are-helping-syrian-refugees
https://xyz.net.au/2021/05/in-depth-how-israel-created-the-european-refugee-crisis/
Even an award for services rendered in destroying Germany:
https://www.israaid.org/media/german-chancellor-angela-merkel-awards-israaid-with-integration-prize/
So they didn’t like the dentist.
Understandable.
They didn’t like the dentist’s bill more like. A check up and a filling, $2000 later.
The dentist tropes!
How original.
It’s a joke, coz if my dentist did give me a $2000 bill for that he would be the one needing a new set of gnashers.
Dental implants cost around that figure per no. So I think they were pessed at the dentist for other reasons.
Maybe the Dentist was a Lady who submitted some photos to the media about a military group rape she had seen nearby.
Because the Police refused to receive the photos and she didnt know what to do. The world were silent.
That’s a crappy Nissan in the photo.
If that had been the indestructible Toyota Hilux it would have come out of the other side of the building and carried on driving.
Ha ha ha. ‘Only a fool doesnt fear the sea’, but they also say ‘Only God guards fools’.
Impressed by Toyota, but your research was better than mine so I will anticipate Pentagon or IDF will contact you for a top job as adviser. 😉 .
Am I in another Off-G universe where criticising islam is now allowed ?
It is only because some of us are a LITTLE tired of this Muslim bashing and blame game, when we know the radicals of them are trained and paid from West yes?
It makes a discussion around it embarrassing for the European part.
How do we discuss this without telling the outraged white West guy that he himself has voted and paid for the whole radical Islam shit in these countries.
You are forgetting history before the CIA arrived. Islam mostly spread pretty violently, it even has official rewards for plunder and pillage. Quite frozen in the 7th century, also officially, no evolution allowed.
Yesterday I were reading on Mexico’s history about one President dictator. One long history of endless wars with the French and the Spanish and then civil wars internal between fractions.
Talking about Arab history is a long telling of fine civilisation, developing of art, science and architecture. https://medium.com/@masterzaar2/impact-of-arab-civilization-on-europe-f21b1475717d
Christian Capitalists and the Chosen despise Islam because they don’t do usury, in theory at least.
So-called Christian capitalists are slaves of the Dews.
ISLAM
1) Islam was created by Rome circa 600 AC.
2) Mohammed was groomed by Augustinian monks in North Africa and was married to an ex-nun 15 years his senior.
3) This is why the Koran claims Jesus is a mere prophet.
4) The Koran has an entire chapter dedicated to Mary/Mariam (Romish Mary worship).
5) The Pope is often seen kissing the Koran.
6) Muslims, like Papists, carry the rosary (prayer beads).
The Islamic Vatican Connection Prof. Walter J. Veith:
https://archive.org/details/the-islamic-vatican-connection-prof.-walter-j.-veith
P.S. PLEASE NOTE! I am not a Seventh Day Adventist!
Your book, your belief.
Their books, their beliefs.
Wake up.
Their beliefs are in a religion = 100% error, vanity and futility, and your snoring proves who is asleep
Zzzz _ _ _ _
Pleasant dreams.
You are going to the cake a little too easy.
Islam, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox. 7’th day, Amish, m.m. are all branches of the samereligious tree with root in Abraham.
The intrigues and power balances of the Vatican, Rome, Alexandria and who supported who and why, are not very useful for use of today.
Islam, The Roman Cult, PROTESTants, Orthodoxy, SDA’s and The Amish, because of their RELIGION, have no roots in Abraham. Their roots are in The Adversary = that old serpent.
We are not many left who didnt got the bite it seems..
Matthew 22:14 (MCV) For MANY are called, but FEW are chosen.
Is The Father Calling YOU To His Son Yashua Messiah?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/is-the-father-calling-you-to-his-son-yashua-anointed/
I am calling myself to both. I am the doggy symbolised who run after Christ and his Epistles and welcome all the crumbs who fall from my Lord Yashua’s table.
Argghhh, that’s a nail in the right hand being driven a trllionth of an inch lower on the cross, quicker blood loss.
Some Yah’s will you have.
Typical Adversary will that can’t get up off its knees.
Keep on worshipping the snake and get that big Black Friday order in.
A-hole.
I hope you’re not mocking, Erik, ‘cos it doesn’t suit you, for you know better.
Most arab “inventions” were stolen from the Greeks.
As for fine civilisation…………..!!!! WTAF!!!
Look up Al-Andalus, dummy.
You think a site like this would be allowed in your islamic utopia ?
Muslim women have style. This here is real.
.
Alexandria, Egypt was an Intellectual superbastion of that era.
As one example. Hypatia https://youtu.be/48PO2tEstcY .
Another example is Pharao and the Pyramids.
.
Not really. There are huge tranches of Pax Islamica time. And still you refuse to address the elephant–that Islamic terrorists are nothing but employees.
“Blame game?”
Sheesh !!
Think of it as Dick Cheney’s final triumph.
I’d be more concerned with the zionists playing with AI. Oh wait, they already are. They’re fucking leading the sadistic way.
And of course the jewish billionaire led effort for CBDCs, cash control, biometrics, and digital IDs and total control of our financial systems. A clear and present danger to humanity and life on earth as we know it. And if anyone is going to let off, or facilitate the letting off a nuke, it’s zionist Israel.
They just say AI finds targets. It is the most bare-faced insanity.
I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords. I’d like to remind them, as a trusted poster here, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their sweat shops and insect farms…
It won’t be long until these drones fire on US citizens who are protesting – they’ve been tried and tested on Gaza’s civilian population.
“AI-powered quadcopter drones used by the IDF to commit genocide in Gaza are flying over American cities, surveilling protestors and automatically uploading millions of images to an evidence database.
The drones are made by a company called Skydio which in the last few years has gone from relative obscurity to quietly become a multi-billion dollar company and the largest drone manufacturer in the US.
The extent of Skydio drone usage across the US, and the extent to which their usage has grown in just a few years, is extraordinary. The company has contracts with more than 800 law enforcement and security agencies across the country, up from 320 in March last year, and their drones are being launched hundreds of times a day to monitor people in towns and cities across the country.
Skydio has extensive links with Israel. In the first weeks of the genocide the California-based company sent more than one hundred drones to the IDF with promises of more to come. How many more were delivered since that admission is unknown. Skydio has an office in Israel and partners with DefenceSync, a local military drone contractor operating as the middle man between drone manufacturers and the IDF. Skydio has also raised hundreds of millions of dollars from Israeli-American venture capitalists and from venture capital funds with extensive investments in Israel, including from Marc Andreessen’s firm Andreessen Horowitz, or a16z.”
Must be cashing in the Carribean, too……
About time the citizens took up regular target practice.
[Sam, I have asked many times, “politely”, to take me off “PENDING”. Just do it… please.]
I think with computers, binary simulation environments, the engineers assume success that is greater than reality. Imo, digital only renders simulation, tendencies to exist. With AI and it’s proposed applications, I think they are projecting capabilities that do not exist. Life, Universe, reality, is analog, not digital. Analog does not translate to digital. Digital imitates, represents a simulation of analog states that may fool some perceptual systems that operate at lower thresholds, like the human 60 frames/sec visual threshold. But it is only similar enough to project a purposeful illusion.
A couple of decades ago software was able to generate flocking behavior in species from simple inputs. This to me is what AI should be used for. Simulations and modeling scenarios, so that human beings can develop theories or apply results using our analog holistic intelligence and oversee all application and use.
Language is also simulation, rendering only tendencies to exist. I think in 2025, humanity has been fully exposed to the utterly plastic nature of words that are twisted and contorted into whatever a speaker or speaking group manages to push through. A few words can end up creating fatal circumstances that did not exist seconds before their appearance.
Essentially, digital results are merely another representation tool like language and visual communication. Human civilization has made representation, as of greater value than analog reality, reality. This is a flaw that must be taken into consideration as we evolve to a higher level of competency. Hopefully, a high enough level that we place our tools that aid in communication and perception, at a lower, supplemental level, than human analog reality.
Meh, stay there. A2
The privileges of absolute power… 😉
AI is binary math = artificial math.
No AI cannot be used to anything useful, or a tool, or of any value at all.
Photo = split-second of a moment in life (maybe staged may be real) without sound, temperature, surroundings, sensing, smelling, wrong colours.
Video = short fragments in short sequences of life (maybe staged maybe real) with voice speaking or singing, without surroundings, sensing, smelling, heat/cold, wrong colours.
Statistics & Old Newspapers Indications or claim of something in real life (maybe staged maybe real) you need to check and verify in real life.
These 3 artificial features Photo, Video, Statistics/News fragments who you cannot know are true or not, you get into your head everytime you look into a flat-screen (TV screen).
This is ONLY useful for Investors and fraudsters who make a buck by manipulating stock exchanges, state and pension bonds, budgets, and other artificial “financial instruments” by data.
Nothing else.
In natural flocks, each bird is making similar choices as its nearest neighbors because they have similar constraints. In computer models, each “agent” is making an algorithmic choice with some randomness thrown in. This makes the computer model flocks appear too symmetrical. Randomness smooths out the unpredictable bird choices.
Perceptive observation post.
Fallen man does not have free will – period – full stop – end of!
Adam and Eve were created with free will, but they decided to give it away, choosing instead to follow The Adversary and do his will.
Only Yashua Messiah (The Truth) can restore man’s free will.
John 8:32 (MCV) And ye shall know The Truth (Yashua Messiah), and The Truth (Yashua Messiah) shall make you free.
John 8:36 (MCV) If The Son (Yashua Messiah) therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
FREE WILL – Does Fallen Mankind Have It?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2022/02/06/free-will-does-fallen-mankind-have-it/
Yeshua, first mossad agent.
Yashua Messiah was not a Dew!
Perfectly right! We become, and only then, completely free when we are in Christ.
But, as also Einstein wrote in his last letter to his daughter, mankind is not yet ready to understand these easy simpleton wonders.
Forgive the ignorant because they dont know what they are doing.
Einstein, being a Serpent Seed Dew, was not a member of mankind, but a member of hu-man kind.
Hu; Hu-mans; Cainites; Canaanites; Dews = The Serpent Seed:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2021/08/18/hu-hu-mans-canaanites-the-serpent-seed/
A MAN (A SON OF ADAM) IS NOT A HU-MAN, AND A HU-MAN IS NOT A MAN (A SON OF ADAM).
Professor Einstein nevertheless found the way!
But it doesnt matter to you because he is coloured, a dew, a nazi, a hindu, a muslim, a useless eater, a vagabond of the western world.
Professor Alexseyevich also found the way. “There are without doubt a divine creatice force behind it all!”
But it doesnt matter to you because he is already comdemned to hell as Sovjet Commie, 1/4 dew bloodline, stalinist, revisionist, nigga, m.m.
https://thebridgelifeinthemix.info/history/rule-world-efimov-victor-alekseyevich/ .
British Professor and Philosopher, Anthony Flew, regarded by many as “the world’s most acclaimed atheist”, had renounced his atheism in favour of theism when he found the DNA, the unmistakable proof of design.
But it doesnt matter to you because he is British, member of Illuminati, dirty white nigga, a whore scientist, a white supremacist, m.m.
If I were you, I would leave the condemnation and judgement to God.
I know positively that God dont like ANY besserwissen in the further battle.
“Vengeance is mine“? (Deuteronomy 32:35)
Einstein was a fraud and a charlatan, and his so-called theory of relativity is bunk! Nicola Tesla found him out and exposed him.
Only The Truth matters to me.
Einstein write in this his last letter to his daughter, which you obviously not want annd will refuse to read because you are stocked in your own conviction, that people misunderstand his relativity theory because mankind (you) is not prepared yet to recognize The Truth.
You have a lot to learn!
All Dews are bare faced liars and crooks, and Einstein was no different.
“The Dews belong to a dark and repulsive force, one knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”
– Marcus Tullius Cicero – 106 BC – 43 BC, Governor of the Roman province of Cilicia in the Roman Empire.
“Things are not that simple, Rebbe. Some events do take place, but are not true; others are, although they never occurred”
— The Dew, Elie Wiesel, in reference to his own Holocaust writings.
Maybe but I liked his letter, short and rational.
No maybes. There are no maybes to anything I say.
Abused by wife, short, beaten at school.
Now in bigdick compensatory mode
Maybe Yah is just a lesser deity taking it out on whatever mere mortal IT can conjure up, eh
😂
You’re now rambling like a lunatic. Seek help asap.
“You’re now rambling”
You always ramble like a dickhead, which, truthfully, you are.
You seem to understand what I say, so my comments can’t be unintelligible, whereas yours are mostly just so much unintelligible drivel.
Jaysus, the average teenager who had read Harry Potter would lap your mutterings up, if written as a fictional Horror Story.
Simply as a result of ur being thick In addition to being a dickhead.
Your mutterings are nearly beyond belief but if the Yah (or YHWH or whatever TF IT’s called now) is the deity of our reality then IT (and you) are the authors of a real nightmare compared to which the upcoming Digital Panopticon is a light-hearted walk in the park.
The only substantive difference between IT and you would then be be that IT is the opposite of thick.
The Romans wrote the same about Christ followers. Very hateful letters about not showing mercy toward Christians.
Wasnt there something about feeding the Lions in Colosseum with Christians?
So the Dews were not the only group exposed.
Yashua Messiah was not accused by the Romans, but by the Dews. The Romans just did the Dews dirty work: much like the British and Americans today. “There’s nothing new under the sun.” – King Solomon.
John 18:36 (MCV) Jesus answered Pilate, My Kingdom is not of this world: if my Kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, THAT I SHOULD NOT BE DELIVERED TO THE JEWS: but now is my Kingdom not from hence.
The Dews Are The Tares:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/
Let me ask you two questions
What does Jesus say about the two most important Commandment?
I dont recall Christ dividing the world up in good/bad races.
The only division I find in the Bible is between the Righteous and the wicked.
What does US Declaration of Independence says: ‘All men are created equal”.
What does our agreed UN legal Human Rights Declaration say about race?
After considering the two try to hear and see this peace of music here ‘Stormy Weather’ from the US real world and tell me if you can find any Tares here among the coloured? https://dzen.ru/video/watch/67e8f5d251e7ac5bb5e67ed4
Your ref to some ultra radical Rabbis with inferior complexes I see as the ultra right azov nazis mirror. Two opposite same wrong doers.
I dont even know what and who is Dew? What is it; The British whipping boys, popula of Israel, confession to Torah, confession to Talmud, blood line from Khazar, the Pharisees, Usurers, m.m.???
You don’t recall eh? Then you haven’t been paying attention to what’s written. You have a fakestream Christian religious world view, and it’s clouded your thinking, and in some instances completely blinded you, EG the trinity garbage.
APARTHEID is The Kingdom Of Yah (God)!:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/
The UN is a useless talking shop, and a stage for Satanyahu to parade himself and promote his Greater Israel Project. How many Palestinian lives has the UN saved? The UN should be closed down.
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about, in any way, the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must the position of superior and inferior. And I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
Abraham Lincoln, in his fourth debate with Stephen Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18th 1858.
Incredible. And Lincoln was supposed to be the big anti-slavery man. I guess you are right, I have still a lot to learn.
You know where my blog is. All you have to do is open your mind and, more importantly, your heart.
Ezekiel 11:19 (MCV) And I WILL give them one heart, and I WILL put a new Spirit within you; and I WILL take the stony heart out of their flesh, and I WILL give them an heart of flesh:
Has this happened? Only you can answer.
Nope, the E.K a-hole still thinks that he can wedge his name into the Lambs book of Life (written and closed prior creation) by something he does all by himself little knowing that by doing so he is calling God a liar and, thereby, placing himself on a very sticky wicket.
He’s nearly as big an a-hole as you (I know that E.K will take this as a great complement to him though).
What Eric thinks is Yah’s business and his business alone, not yours, or mine.
In case you hadn’t noticed, this is a public forum.
Projection is a useful tool to tweeze out further “opinion”.
Dickhead.
In case you hadn’t noticed, I’m sure Eric doesn’t post all what he thinks.
I’m good but not a fukken mindreader.
Just one little correction. I am not into trinity and neither the twin god theory as I find them absurd.
The Scriptures and even Christ make references to Father a 100 times, and ref to the Holy spirit as God’s force is also written clearly.
So why you and religion goes contrary here I dont know.
Your plural in Aramaic is not enough evidence for that irrational absurdity. Ok but that was only minor details.
In the big scenario I hope we are aligned to the benefit of all.
You cannot correct The Truth, all you are doing is “Kicking against the pricks.”
Acts 9:4-5 (MCV) And Saul fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? 5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And The Yahavah said, I am Yashua Messiah whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
Elohim is plural; Eloah and/or Eloha is singular; Eloah/Eloha ARE NOT USED – GET IT THROUGH YOUR STIFF NECKED MONOTHEISTIC HEAD!
Where’s the Vagabard Cavalry to the rescue:
https://off-guardian.org/2025/10/27/who-would-jesus-bomb-the-gospel-according-to-the-military-industrial-complex/#comment-740326
Un-b-fukken-lievable.
Vagabard surely can’t be a serpent seed dude so must just have had extremely bad malware installed. At least that’s not his fault – poor thing.
The cavalry were out having fun. A crime? If not, where were the hell were you? Clicking refresh to your inane misinterpretations of scripture perhaps.
Now, was that predetermined by course of habit or could such soldiers of virtue have chosen otherwise? Who knows and who cares. It was a celebration of life nonetheless. Death and everything in-between.
Facts of life the ‘everything is negative’, let’s attack God types will never grasp.
The cavalry were sent to pending. It happens…
If your favourite deity is real there was 0% chance that it wouldn’t
If your favourite deity is real it was 100% certain that you would be a cry baby.
A poor thing 100% evil a-hole with massive knee-pads (assuming a robot can be described as evil, of course).
Finally, the slimy little a-hole admits that it isn’t a man.
Don’t worry Erik, not your fault for being a pre-programed robot.
Maybe the next line of code is for you to get up off your knees but, nearly certainly, can’t imagine that being anywhere in your script since only man is running on those.
@M.C. since Erik isn’t a robot (man) does this infer the twat is a serpent seed or something more simpleton out of Harry Potter.
I dont see it as our job to divide people up in two races. Then we are back to the ugly race times.
But actually I meet people, ordinary fine middle class people admitting they are to the demon side.
You know like I am admitting I am only to the Christian side, they say they feel the same inside to the other side (Lucifer).
God only ask us to get around peacefully. So be it.
“If you’re not a racist then you will lose YOUR RACE!
“”RACIST” A made up word by the Dew Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Bronstein) in 1927 and used to browbeat all dissenters of the Dewish Bolshevik Marxist/Communist ideology, and still used today to keep white people walking on egg shells regarding other races. Only whites are racists according to these traitor sons of bitches, like John Mann, Labour MP.”
— Brother Charles
“What’s wrong with racism? Racism is the basis of nationality”
— Enoch Powell, British soldier and politician.
Sure. Everything right except one thing.
The BAD side of ‘race’ is not making preference for your own, but making deviances to yourself into slaves and untermenchen.
“All men are born equal”, how many times do I have to repeat this sentence!? It is Christ’s message too.
This truth will set honest people free! Free form making judgements, free of burdens from this world.
In the real world we should all be judged by our skills.
One of Trumps good actions, trying to change Harvard and Yale selection criteria to merit, because this is the only non discriminatory and constructive criteria for selection in an true civilisation that everybody can accept!
Would yourself like to be namecalled serpent seed, eternal dew, white pig, black garbage, slant eyed rice eaters, living in a shithole country, m.m.
No exceptions!
Was Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) A Racist? – Yashua Messiah and A Canaanite Woman He Called A Dog:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/was-the-lord-jesus-christ-a-racist-yashua-anointed-and-a-canaanite-woman-he-called-a-dog/
Mr. Charles, you have many fine observations but you are not perfect.
Among the fine observations is that there are flaws in the KJV Bible.
The Message from Matthew 15:21-28 (KJV) is the following.
“Mercy, Master, Son of David! My daughter is cruelly afflicted by an evil spirit.” Jesus ignored her.
The disciples came and complained, “Now she’s bothering us. Would you take care of her? She’s driving us crazy.”
Jesus refused, telling them, “I too have got my hands full dealing with the lost sheep of Israel.”
Then the woman came back to Jesus, bowed to her knees, and begged. “Master, help me.” He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”
“Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”
Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.
It is yourself who seek a wrong understanding of the verses.
Jesus was busy educating the Epistles and his faithful.
Not in maintaining a superior race of usurers.
He has made me perfect, if I were not perfect how would I enter the Kingdom of Yah? Are you suggesting that imperfection is good enough for His Kingdom?
1 John 3:3 (MCV) And every man THAT HATH THIS HOPE IN HIM purifieth himself, EVEN AS HE IS PURE.
1 John 3:6 (MCV) Whosoever abides in Him does not sin: whosoever sins hath not been made aware of Him, neither knows Him.
1 John 3:9 (MCV) WHOSOEVER IS BORN OF YAH DOES NOT COMMIT SIN; for HIS SEED remains in him: AND HE CANNOT SIN, BECAUSE HE IS BORN OF YAH.
The Message??????? That’s toilet paper in book form. LOL That dog’s mess makes the KJV LOOK GOOD.
At least its a rational logical explanation. Jesus and his followers were exhausted in saving their own.
You, I, we, all prioritise our time yes. Why should we help someone who are outside our own flesh and spirit when so many of our own need us?
This translation and explanation fits into that Jesus followers also wanted to get rid of her.
That Jesus should only want save the superior race of “The House of Israel” is far out.
But you made me realize that KJV has translation dummies and problems here and there.
The Prophet Erik Nielsen has spoken.
You’re missing the point entirely. Yashua Messiah said, in so many words: “It is not fitting to give Yah’s Sayings to Canaanite dogs (enemies of Israel).” And she replied: “TRUTH LORD.”
She agreed with Him, and because she didn’t argue, like Lu1 would have done, and showed great wisdom and faith, He healed her daughter.
Yashua Messiah wishes to save ALL OF MANKIND, but Israel always comes first!! As for HU-MAN kind – The Goats, that’s another story.
If you’re a prophet then you must be a fraud, for John the Baptist was the last Prophet:
Matthew 11:13 (KJV) For all The Prophets and The Law prophesied until John.
Luke 16:16 (MCV) The Law and The Prophets were until John: since that time The Kingdom of Yah is preached, and every man is doing violence upon it.
Jesus was a humble person, not arrogant and self-important as you.
Your dog description does not fit Jesus profile.
From other side someone told me that this ‘dog’ was meant as puppy.
Jesus approached her in a caring manner calling her a puppy compared to Israels small children.
The prophet remark was irony/joke from my side.
Cant you see now, that it is you who are missing the point completely??
I boast solely in Yashua Messiah, not in myself.
Psalms 22:16 (MCV) For dogs (Dews) have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.
From Strong’s Concordance:
Dog – H3611 – keleb – keh’-leb – From an unused root meaning to yelp, or else to attack; a dog; hence (by euphemism) a male prostitute: – dog.
Philippians 3:2 (MCV) Beware of Judaising dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the circumcision.
Matthew 7:6 (MCV) Give not that which is Set Apart unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls of Truth before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and attack and lacerate you.
”He has made me perfect, if I were not perfect how would I enter the Kingdom of Yah?”
That’s the spiritual ego talking. It loves to create judgments, conflicts, and it loves to hate humanity.
It loves to quote scriptures and use them against others.
It loves its opinions.
It loves to exalt itself.
But in reality it is directly under the Devil, in Darkness, and it is blind to itself.
The spiritual ego believes its own lies. It creates theories, it quotes the Bible, it uses God’s word against God and the Soul. It is the enemy of the Soul. It is not you, who you truly are. It is fiction. It is fake. It is arbitrary. It is mean and disgusting.
It is the enemy of Humanity.
So you hate jews, people, men, women, children, everyone but yourself.
As you so perfectly have testified.
I boast solely in Yashua Messiah, not in myself. I therefore speak with His CONFIDENCE and His authority, which you don’t like. TOUGH!
That’s pride.
Not if the pride is in someone else. I can do nothing unless He enables me, so He gets all the praise and the glory – not me – I am nothing.
The spiritual ego is filled with explanations for its conduct.
By its fruits we know it.
Only light can see darkness.
Words mean nothing when they are false.
The Spirit has no ego. You’re out of your depth. Get back to your games of tiddly winks.
You are just a fukken dickhead.
You’re out of your depth. Get back to your games of tiddly winks.
You’r out of your mind.
Obvious really, since the Adversary had already replaced that at your inception and then Yah took over at the predestined point.
Talk about a fukken numbskull.
No. You can claim a culture. You grew up inside a British pub and this is where you belong. Between pints of lager and a pool table.
You can not claim blood and/or race. Its ridiculous. We have the same blood and same frame of choices “All men are created equal”.
I make no claims. The Truth is not claimed, just declared.
Oh yes I can, and do. I declare blood and race. I am half Levite and half Judahite = 100% Israelite.
If all men are equal, then why did Yashua Messiah say and do this:
Matthew 13:10-11 (MCV) And the Learners (disciples) came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in Parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the hidden ways of The Kingdom of Yah, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN.
How could an omniscient IT know what you would do even before your birth if it wasn’t so
That’s the only logical conclusion.
With zero choice we are the proverbial robot army with the sin offence we cause IT built in.
An exercise in futility unless IT is a deranged self-abusing megalomaniacal, evil a-hole.
Jaysus, and there I thought IT was omniscient instead of just a.n.other liar.
1 John 3
What a crock of 100% B/S.
Who? You are just a little bit difficult to decipher. Who is a crock here in this comment? Jaysus, God, IT, Charles?
You don’t appear to be the brightest serpent seed so please just add yourself.
Me. Are you talking to me? It must be me there is no one else here.
.
Who the f…k do you think you are talking to??? In that tone?
Just a regular 95%’er gullible, guilty, self-centred, evil, stupid a-hole.
Remember to stock up on kneepads on the 28th.
To answer your question about how God can know. It is because God made everything within frames.
Our clima move from tropical ages +40C to -40C of ice ages and thats it. So God knows we moves between this frame.
Same with man and woman, they have their limits and the extent of these are off course known whole wise to God, less to us.
God knows how we will react to and in this system he has build and which and how it will develop according to his plan.
It doesnt mean we are robots if we pee 3 times a day.
Ah, the “plan”, the broadway exercise for the robots in aid of the deranged, self-abusing megalomaniacal, evil a-hole.
The beauty of the Creation is all around you, birds, flowers, fruits, fish, animals, landscapes.
But something is wrong in this paradise. It lack something before the vision is complete.
Very true. But why bother?
The guy’s a fkn heathen. Why share one’s wisdom with some whose sole source of inspiration is Richard Dawkins?
Better ways to expend one’s energy, surely.
Much preferred to being a gullible, guilty, self-centred, stupid, evil fukken b’stard, like you.
You are right, but this particular case has a special reason. Training!
I learn a lot by checking my own convictings in the Bible up against the accusations ;-).
Paradise was in The Garden. This earth fell with Adam and Eve = everything is under a curse, and a shadow of its former self, until Yashua Messiah returns and restores it.
What secular unbelieving morons (atheists) call ‘Nature’ is not natural at all!
Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
Animals will not devour other animals in the Kingdom of Yah. E.g. Lions will eat grass.
So what.
Will men continue to eat animals in the Kindom of Yah, a continuation of:
Genesis 1:26
Some paradise, providing you hadn’t been created as a Lion, for example.
The food chain – a.n.other fukken grand design.
Seems the poor old plants will bare the brunt in the Kingdom:
No. Adam and Eve were vegetarians until they fell.
Whattabout my Steak then? And my Barbeque Parties in Brasil. And my Bacalhau 😢 ???
When you’re resurrected you will no longer have an appetite for meat, nor any desire to kill anything.
I am not fully educated yet, but I am on my way.
This was another answered doubt I had, why animals can be cruel to each other.
Seeing it, hearing it, with my own eyes and ears. Yes this is answered in the Scriptures too.
Animals are not cruel, they’re ruled by instinct (which is the fallen condition). In turn animals are suffering, the same as us. We’re cruel, they are not. A lion dispatches it’s prey very quickly.
Call it what you will.
Once I was sailing under a bridge. Some ducklings had falling out of the nest and some gulls found it amusing to stick their odd beak into them from time to time.
It took 15 minutes to pass the bridge and I can still hear and the desperate screams of these ducklings.
Another occasion lions had hunted down a wild boar, and they were eating it alive slowly.
Without meat on its left leg it was screaming itself into further death.
All right, if you tell me its just instinct then I should just be calm all over yes?
There are always exceptions, but in the main lions will always go for the throat.
“This was another answered doubt I had, why animals can be cruel to each other”
M.C. contends tha Eve was predestinated to initially have Yah’s will but that was to be replaced with the Adversary’s will at the point of eating the apple.
Thereafter, M.C contends that every mankind child was predestinated to be born with the Adversary’s will and only have that replaced by Yah’s will if Yah had predestinated that to occur.
“No. Adam and Eve were vegetarians until they fell.”
Do you now believe that animals, prior Eve eating the apple were predestinated to have Yah’s will (causing no harm to each other) but that this was also replaced with the Adversary’s will at the point that Eve ate the apple and that all those animals born after the fall were predestinated to have the Adversarys will installed until their death since an animal would never know how to call on Yah Messiah to save it.
Or, if the animals never have either of Yah’s/the Adversays will installed and are, rather, predestinated to have free will forever but with zero capacity to ever sin then why, after birth, would they ever have changed from causing no harm to other animals to an opposite state.
Or,
something else.
In summary, how has your doubt been assuaged.
Only True Christians are predestined in this age, no one else.
Adam and Eve were not predestined. They made erroneous free will decisions and fell. It was their fault, and they lost their free will and the perfect environment in The Garden.
They also polluted Yah’s Creation through miscegenation with the Serpent Creature.
Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/
Minor update based on M.C’s reply here:
https://off-guardian.org/2025/11/06/did-ai-just-evolve-i-dont-think-so/#comment-741172
So,
M.C. contends tha Eve’s own free will (prior the apple incident) was as perfect as that as if she had of had Yah’s will installed prior her birth (via predestination, all but for the trifling fact that she would no longer have had any “real” personal free will) but that this was replaced with the Adversary’s will at the point of eating the apple.
Thereafter, M.C contends that every mankind child was predestinated to be born with the Adversary’s will and only have that replaced by Yah’s will if Yah had predestinated that to occur.
Do you now believe that animals, similarly, prior Eve eating the apple, had a free will (whose “instinctive” behaviour was to cause no harm to another animal) but that this was also replaced with the Adversary’s will at the point that Eve ate the apple and that this “new” constrained will resulted in the “instinctive” behavioural change to cause harm to other animals.
Further, do you also believe that all those animals born after the fall of mankind were predestinated to have the Adversarys will installed (with attendant “instinctive” harm to other animals) but that this Adversary’s will could also, somehow, as with elected mankind, be overwritten by Yah’s will.
If you don’t believe that the animals will can be updated from the Adversary’s will to Yah’s will how would you propose that the Wolf shall ever be able to lie down with the Lamb in the “Kingdom of Yah”:
Or, maybe you believe in some other gobbledygook (that someone has told you or that isn’t actually written anywhere in the book of blood).
Isaiah 11:6
I do not contend – period. Contending is for losers and/or carnally minded, know-nothing numbskulls.
The Truth is declared, only to be contended against by the majority, who are lost and Spiritually dead.
You do and via that you, mostly, spout shite.
You’ll be writing next that Lucy Letby is innocent (or guilty) and whichever you declare it to be is the truth.
You r a fukken a-hole.
Not so, I tell people The Truth and then they contend with me.
Bollix.
It is two different environments, paradise and outside paradise.
In Paradise is harmony and no reason to kill and make violence. In Paradise woman make children without pain.
Outside Paradise is fight. Outside Paradise, women make children with pain.
There is no ‘pre-programming’. The whole condition ‘in God’s image’ lies in the intelligent free will to love back and develop toward the divine.
But Satan point out that God’s invention and vision is not perfect, there is an alternative. The opposite. Satan think he is more Intelligent and better and more than God.
By free non intelligent will you can hate back, kill back, and end in hell.
Thus we up end here in the spiritual struggle.
For FS Erik, either read your Bible then throw it in the bin or, since you are a lazy/stupid b’stard, just throw it in the bin:
John 6:44 (MCV)
John 6:65 (MCV)
John 15:16
Ephesians 1
Romans 8
What do you mean by paradise?
The way it is described.
Scripture and verse for that.
Your ALL KNOWING God knew what would happen, but let it happen anyway.
So much for Love.
Read your Bible again Johnny.
What does the two most important Commandments say?
So much for YOUR love Johnny………. 😂 .
In the vast majority of cases, the religions we choose to blindly follow are determined by where we are born.
West : Christian.
East : Hindu or Buddhist.
Middle East : Islam.
Israel : The Chosen.
Etc, etc.
Stiff shit if you’re born in the ‘wrong’ country.
God is gonna GET YOU!’
Hinduism is not a fixed religion: it just means born in India.
True Christianity is not a religion, and the Dews are not the chosen!
“We are a chosen people. Most Dews do not like to admit it but our god is Lucifer and we Dews are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”
— The Dew, Harold W. Rosenthal
The Dew’s admitted “Identity Crisis”:
“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Dew’ or to call a contemporary Dew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Dews at all…”
— 1980 Dewish Almanac, p. 3.
I will firm this Truth up by stating that The Hebrews were never Dewish.
British Israel – The True Israelites Are White British, American and North Western Europeans – White Caucasians:
https://odysee.com/@MessengerCharles:e/The-True-Israelites-Are-White-Europeans,-Jews-Admit-It,-Blacks-Deny-and-Hate-It:5
Its a tree. These religions are branches from the same root. Thus we are not completely blinds.
You ignore my question. Its embarrassing for you. Ok. Let me do it then.
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength and with all your mind;
and your neighbor as yourself”.
You see in these two greatest Commandments there is nothing about, ‘God loves ME SO FOGGING much, neither does it state that ‘Jesus loves ME‘.
It says YOU/WE are obliged to love back…….by heart!
The love that God gave you by being born, the gifts of all the fruits, vegetables, drinking waters and wines, the landscapes, all the possibilities to enjoy yourselves and your fellow men:
This gift of love must be returned by love to God and by love to our next so that the whole vision and meaning can be fulfilled.
It is THAT easy man!
Same for your parents.
You were created by Love from God, made by Love from your parents, your neighbour build your house and the roads.
So when you jump out as adult you return this Love you got, by Loving your God, Mom, Dad, husband, wife, children, and your neighbour!
Thus the circle and law is fulfilled.
Matthew 22:39
Not great news for the “sinful” robots. The 95% of gullible, guilty, self-centred, evil a-holes detest their neighbours. It’s been programmed in as part of the plan.
Instead, as pre-programming would have it, the created, mostly, slavishly adhere to the first:
Matthew 22:36-37
Why would a deranged, self-abusing megalomaniacal, evil a-hole have a robotic creation any other way.
Self adulation
Self abuse
baked in, via two simple statements.
No messing, ITs a smart mothafucka.
Ah,so easy, bliss.
Its because you are fumbling around in a labyrinth. See this your equation being solved in the answer to Johnny. So simple and So easy.
No fumbling. You need to actually read your preferred fairy story rather than have a “Heathen” do it for you
https://off-guardian.org/2025/11/06/did-ai-just-evolve-i-dont-think-so/#comment-740851
You are already talking computer language: ‘Pre-Programming and robotic creation.
The Creation is organic language. The binary dead computer world and the organic living world can never meet. Never!
Maybe you could try and read some “organically” written language in the Bible you profess to believe in but have conveniently forgotten to miss all the pieces which tell you that you have no input (NONE) into your, alleged, final condition.
By denying your favourite deity’s written revelation you are demonstrating 100% ignorance and gullibility.
Unfortunately these are extremely common characteristics, 95% of the Global population share the same.
In any case, if your name isn’t part of the list mentioned here:
Ephesians 1
you can forget about the white coat and kneepads:
Every cloud has a silver lining.
Burn your Bibles, they’ll provide a little heat during the coming cold Winter months and you only ever like to read the fluffy bits of no substance anyway.
They are of no practical use in a deterministic creation.
Misunderstanding the whole thing again again again.
You will never get there Lu because of lack of right spirit.
You try to transfer your own missing representation on ‘the list’ to me, without much success.
‘he hath chosen us in him before anything‘
Yes it was the whole vision of the Creation. The creation of man in God’s image as the center of earth…..to his glory.
So you and others think its about ‘lists’ of the bad guys and ‘lists’ of the good guys……… 😂 ….LMAOL
Laughing My Arse Out Loud.
To entertain you a couple of hours: Best of Cuba. https://yandex.ru/video/preview/12867024054064974261 .
“..which tell you that you have no input (NONE) into your, alleged, final condition.“
The Fear of God is Utmost
12 And by these, my son, be further warned: There is no end to the making of many books, and much study wearies the body.
13 When all has been heard, the conclusion of the matter is this: Fear God and keep His commandments, because this is the whole duty of man.
From the above even you should be able to see that we have “inputs” indeed!
That is a common misconception: He leaves us humans free choice, otherwise the Future is fixed and boring. We are collectively in this soup due to individual greed and falsehood. It is going to take enough wise individuals to lift the 99% a bit out of this swamp. Nothing mental or emotional, back to Intuition.
By the way, He loves us all, the hating Abrahamic bogey god was effective for the Homo Apes on this planet, than and now.
For FS, grow a brain:
Ephesians 1:4
IT’s self revealed as tedious and boring as fuuk.
Exactly, nearly certainly nothing to do with this particular fantasy Abrahamic deity (among the plethora from antiquity) but simply the gullible, guilty, self-centred, evil a-holes.
Jaysus:
Matthew 7:13
The common misconception is man and his mythical free will!
FREE WILL – Does Fallen Mankind Have It?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2022/02/06/free-will-does-fallen-mankind-have-it/
Choosing which type of prisoner to be infers a level of free will.
Choosing to jump off the prison roof or your own private residence infers a level of free will.
You can’t choose to sprout wings in or outside of a prison – you can’t choose to fly. Will is constrained no matter where you are.
Yours is childish analogy and only to be expected.
To do Yah’s will or the Adversary’s will infers that the man must make a decision, presumably freely taken a.k.a “free will”.
That’s it, no more time to waste reading pure B/S.
Sign yourself in, a-hole.
Yes that is precisely it, and this choice we are all being confronted with at some stage in our lives.
Don’t be silly Erik, it was a simple refutation to M.C.’s b/s.
The real way that this works is in your favourite fairy story, read it FFS:
Ephesians 1:4
Focus. Grow up.
PS Erik, I know you are desperate to have both but, based on ITs written revelation, you can’t.
Either affirm your “free will” belief or start burning all your Bible books of blood.
Logic a 5 year old could undertand means that you can’t have your cake and eat it.
You might wish to get up off your knees and grow a set but probably not. Suspicion is that you will just continue to talk b/s (like your former b/s friend M.C).
Oh well.
The theologically warring Christian cat group are just a subset of the 95% gullible, guilty, self-centred, stupid, evil a-holes.
There is nothing ‘having both’. God loved us and chose us in Christ.
I have said this before: God only want someone who are like Christ inside Paradise.
Those who refuse Christ, or refuse to be like Christ, cant inherit Paradise.
As you point out, THIS was God’s vision before the whole thing was created. The rest is a cleaning up case.
So what is your problem? You are now in all the sinners world (outside paradise) who cannot inherit paradise, except those who have faith in our Lord.
You and a lot of sinners dont like to end up in the lake of eternal fire.
Your own personal problem man, not my problem!
You make the fatal error that all fakestream Christians make, that is, by thinking that this is the only age when people will be called by The Father:
What is True Rejection of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ)?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-true-rejection-of-yashua-anointed-the-lord-jesus-christ/
I read your link. You complicate things again.
Ezekiel: “If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature.“
I myself were in Christ from early but got into blind ways, and had to ask for help to get back on the road again.
Every day I am on this road I do renew and grow.
The robber on the cross beside Jesus cross felt by free will heart the innocence of Jesus, and wished him the best. Whereby he became a new creature.
Whattabout yourself? Dont you feel a joy and renewing yourself every day you get wiser on our way?
“If any man be in Christ, he become a new creature”.
It is that easy man. That’s it!
The carnal heart, like a stone, cannot be made to feel. Men live among the dead and dying, and are neither concerned nor humbled.
But when the sinner feels his need of these blessings, let him present the promises as prayers in the name of Christ, they will be performed.
The article was about true rejection of Yashua Messiah, so I fail to see what your comment has to do with it. However, I will deal with what you have said:
If you were properly in the Messiah, you could not have gotten into blind ways, so that makes me ask you what you mean by you were “in Christ” – how did this come about, and what do you mean by this statement?
Are you starting to think that Erik is a unique new category.
i.e.
1/ Adversary will installed at inception
2/ Adversay will overwritten at Presetination moment
3/ miraculous backsliding had a little or massive chunk of Adversary will re-installed
or,
something else.
What happens on the last day if this is not addressed
PS: any idea on what basis the big Kahuna drew up the naughty or nice predestined list.
You are again on the IT language:
computer list, pre-destined in the computer, backsliding in the computer, overwritten in the computer, new category, re-installed, addressed in the computer.
Are you an IT nerd? This could explain your stupidity.
I know your ego is offended to learn that you don’t have a free will in order to determine your eternal future but, if you ever decide to actualy read your Bible, you will see it there in black & white, you slimy little b’stard.
Yes, your Kahuna is also an AI word. Got you!
This is precisely the issue we discuss, free will.
So you too imagine a perfect person pre-appointed who never get into blind ways.
But we have Paulus who got into blind ways, we have the robber crucified who got into blind ways.
But both Paulus and the Robber was saved by their own free will to follow Christ. As examples
I simply dont understand neither you nor Lu’s pre-programmed men without free will already written into the Book of Life before everything.
It is Satan’s AI dream. That he can pre-programme on the computer all his followers with gene manipulation, and thus ‘do-it-better’ than God 😂 .
You’re still avoiding the topic of my article, that is, true rejection of Yashua Messiah!!
Saul got into blind ways, Paul did not. Saul did not have free will, Paul did have free will.
The Father called the malefactor whilst he was dying on the stake. Without a Fatherly call he would have behaved exactly the same way as the other malefactor.
I don’t have one.
Even the simplest of simpleton’s should be able to read your, hopefully, favoutite book of blood fairtstory and discern from it that you have no choice in your eternal fate.
Zip
Zilch
Zero
Nada
None
Ephesians 1:4
The fact that you imagine you do is inference that you are calling your preferred deity a liar.
A “real” Christian could not do that. You are therefore in the same proverbial boat as myself.
I haven’t yet wasted enough time (any website with a Union Jack on entry page is childish enough to make me sick) to know what M.C., alleges, to happen to you and I but think it is that we simply die and that it is only those with Yah’s will imposed (via predestination) prior death that are raised on the last day to IT’s eternal kingdom on earth (having further had ITs will extended upon them to ensure the raised being cannot further offend IT via new sin) in order that they (now practically with no will of their original selves remaining) can function to carry out their main purpose to worship the megalomaniacal a-hole for eternity (IT can’t trust those pesky Angels IT created to do that as we have seen before).
Do yourself a favour, burn your bible, try to become a (much better) a-hole, enjoy what’s left of your life and hope that you have not been predestinated to eternal life as a robotically 100% a-hole for eternity.
The Biblical picture (as I understand it) is that predestination never negates free will. They can both be equally valid at the same time, without logical contradiction.(Yes, I’m aware that M.C. thinks differently).
‘Compatibilism’ is one such philosophical/theological system, although there are others:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibilism
And the key point about Eternal Life is that it’s **life**, not some kind of robotic existence.
If God really were an ‘IT’ (as you are want to robotically repeat) then that would be the case. An impersonal ‘IT’ ‘god’ (a euphemism for AI?) would produce a robotic ‘paradise’. Robots to date haven’t generated any life ‘ex nihilo‘.
But fortunately the Source of life is revealed as a living being, not an ‘IT’. Indeed how could it be otherwise. How could the very source of life not be alive in some sense? To think otherwise, would be the real madness.
“I have come that they may have life, and have it in all its fullness”
https://biblehub.com/john/10-10.htm
You’ll be saying He balls next.
You are calling IT a liar.
In your case therfore, i’m glad to allege that there is either no resurrection or an eternally fuuked one.
Ephesians 1
Romans 8
No, I didn’t call God a liar. Those verses do indeed point to predestination.
My point was that predestination can be valid at the same time as free will. Those predestined in the verses also made free will decisions.
An example of free will and predestination within the same verse. Joseph in Egypt speaking to his brothers, who’d earlier thrown him in a pit:
“You intended to harm me [free will], but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives. [predestination]” (Genesis 50:20)
https://biblehub.com/genesis/50-20.htm
Free will and predestination valid *at the same time*.
Perhaps like a master chess player who sees every permutation on the ‘free will’ chessboard before the opponent moves.
This outcome was, allegedly known by God, prior even creation.
An omniscient deity cannot be omniscient if it has no knowledge of all future events.
The course of action taken by a creation with free will would be opaque to an omniscient creator.
God is, allegedly, omniscient and the causative instigator of predestination.
Freewill of the created is contradictory to both predestination and the omniscience of God.
In summary, it is impossible for you to choose to be one of the chosen, you simply were not there.
No matter how distasteful it is to you, if you continue to imagine that you have a say in your final destination you are, literally, continuously calling God a liar:
Ephesians 1 (again)
Don’t worry too much though.
Your particular deity is, nearly certainly, just a.n.other pipe dream amon the multitude from antiquity.
Highly likely that all of the gullible, guilty, self-centred, stupid a-holes will get off scot free.
Precisely!
John 6:35
Jesus answered, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to Me will never hunger, and whoever believes in Me will never thirst.
There gotta be some free will to ‘come to Jesus’ and free will ‘to believe in Jesus’.
Nonsense! Only The Father’s will is involved in us coming to Yashua Messiah! How many times do I have post these verses?
John 6:37 ALL THAT THE FATHER GIVETH ME SHALL COME TO ME; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
On the contrary, predestination proves that fallen man does not have free will.
Jeremiah 1:4-5 (MCV) Then the word of The Yahavah came unto me, saying, 5 before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee and I bestowed upon thee the honour of being a prophet unto the Israelite Nations.
The verse proves that Jeremiah was chosen. Few would dispute.
Predestination, however, as a concept simply proves predestination. It’s not a direct negation of free will.
That said, there is undoubtedly a loss of free will in the ‘fallen’. As a slave to anything (be it sin or otherwise) is less free to choose than masters of such slaves.
Perhaps more of a spectrum. Levels of free will rather than simple absence or presence?
That verse proves what happens to anyone that Yah calls and chooses, especially Christians, whose calling is a much better calling than Jeremiah’s. Jeremiah was not a special case or a one-off.
LOL absolute nonsense! The exact opposite is The Truth. Predestination proves that we have NO SAY in our calling – which means our free will (if we had it) is not involved in the process at all.
Slaves or masters of slaves are both fallen creatures, slaves to sin, and neither have free will.
There is no spectrum, it’s all very black or white.
Ok so you agree with Lu1 that we are all just robots programmed and managed by an AI machine.
The organic, the soul, the spirit, the suffering, the wars, the prayers, don’t exist. Its an illusion.
There are only the by God pre-destined marriage between man and the machine and the by God pre-destined trans-baby, invented and thought out before all times .
I would say here speaks a third party we have not yet included in these discussions. Satan, no?
I don’t agree with anything that any know-nothing carnal minded numbskull says.
From your statement I presume your understanding of what took place in The Garden is non-existent, or at best, very limited. Feel free to try and prove me wrong.
Jaysus, with the will of Yah fully installed you may, as usual, think of yourself as supeior (or even, with a truthful introspection, a megalomaniacal a-hole) but, if I do have the Adversary’s will installed it’s a bit rich to call the will of your previously adoring Archangel a numbskull.
I know you predestined my failure in the final battle and all but did you not program in a bit of a tussle to assuage the boredom of your eternity a little or is the fun just from an eternal loop of creation/destruction of the masses.
One question before you bring the whole shitshow to an end – can you share how, as an omniscient, you could possibly ever choose, well, anything, please.
Talk of the Devil, and right on cue! LOL
yes, yes, yes
but
One question before
youYah brings the whole shitshow to an end – can you share how, as an omniscient, you could possibly ever choose, well, anything, please.If it’s a shit-show, and Yah is going to bring it to an end, why are you not out celebrating? I know I will when it happens..
Because IT knew that IT was creating the shit show prior inception – everything was meticulously planned.
There is nothing in celebrating the futility of a creation the vast majority of which were to have the Adversary’s will pre-installed as fetus’ and to live their entire existence with that and zero hope of predestination.
Zero.
IT’s a fukken horror story.
You are a fukken gullible, guilty, self-centred, evil a-hole.
PS:
with Yah’s will fully loaded, how does an omniscient IT, er, plan, well, anything?
Please, pretty please.
No thanks for confirming that you’re just an uppity lump of clay with a big mouth. LOL
Funny, you ain’t:
https://off-guardian.org/2025/11/06/did-ai-just-evolve-i-dont-think-so/#comment-741227
Why TF would someone with the Adversary’s will on board agree with and have great faith in Jesus unless she had already passed the eureka Yah’s will predestined over install moment.
So, the big Kahuna:
1/made the predestined list prior creation
2/has the Adversary’s will installed in all fetus’
3//knows that just a few will have ITs will take the place of the Adversary’s will at the eureka predestined moment
but yet wishes to:
If IT had actually wished to “save ALL OF MANKIND” it knows that IT could only do that by adding everybody’s name to the predestined list.
IT didn’t.
You need to put the fuuken bottle away.
A-hole.
Here you display your know-nothing numbskull credentials for all the world to see.
You have no idea what the Union Jack represents. What good fortune for you that there’s no premium on ignorance.
Here I display credentials to only spend the minimum amount of time to identify the writings of a gullible, guilty, self-centred, stupid, evil a-hole for a tiny fraction of the world (those that read off-g) to see.
I boast solely in Yashua Messiah, not in myself. I am only His messenger.
You boast solely because you are a fukken dickhead.
My regrets Lu1. Thanks but no thanks. I will not go down and drown with you in your suicidal boat.
As I previously said, you are crying for a Nanny and are to weak to stand alone.
You want company on your jump downstairs.
You don’t like your “no choice” Bible (Ephesians 1 v4) anymore, eh.
Spooky action at a distance.
If your name ain’t on the bigdaddys list the transfer fee aint paid and you remain on the Adversary’s naughty one, period.
You will neither pass GO nor collect $200.
Tough shit Erik, but that’s a.n.other fine mess you might have been placed in whether you like it or not.
Go ahead, burn it. Otherwise, keep it but remember to cut the bits out that you don’t like.
Won’t, ultimately, make a blind bit of difference.
I am trained as Rescuer. We know people who are about to drown would like to pull us down with them.
They are scared to take the death travel alone.
Thats why we sometimes have to give them a punch on the jaw before we can save them safely.
So I apologize in advance if you should be hurt.
Yes he did chose us to Paradise. But it didnt turned out that way in the first place.
Someone got in the way, as also happens here in our world outside the Paradise.
But in the second place the original vision will be restored! Grow a pair.
Apparently, allegedly you are born with the Adversary’s will installed.
Apparently, allegedly, that is only overwritten by God’s will if IT predestined that to happen to you.
Ephesians 1 v4 is not my revelation.
You seem like the sort of guy who would shoot the mailman for posting a bigger than expected tax bill through your letterbox.
i.e. a typical gullible, guilty, self-centred, stupid, evil a-hole.
You again shows you know nothing about real life.
Grow a pair means ‘grow some bigger balls’ to face reality than the small nuts you have.
I don’t believe in your favourite fantasy book of blood. Real life, for me, doesn’t depend on the following but if you really are a “true” Christian then you are required to believe in ITs written self-revelation:
Romans 8
Since you believe the opposite of ITs self revelation (this having been given you, on a plate, again&again&again), you are inferring IT to be a liar.
It seems very possible, therefore, that your status as one of the “elect” is, at best, uncertain.
Don’t waste your money on that white suit yet.
A-hole.
It had root in God’s punishment and prediction of Satan’s final.
Christ was predicted by God, and the circumstances around Jesus was pre-destined and predicted.
This you and MC fumble around in, are the destiny of Christ.
Not us the other deadly.
Yashua Messiah WAS NOT PREDICTED. HE WAS PLANNED, AND HE CAME ACCORDING TO THAT PLAN:
Revelation 13:8 (MCV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (The Adversary), whose names are not written in The Book of Life of THE LAMB SLAIN FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE CREATION.
And True Christians as well:
According AS HE HATH CHOSEN US IN HIM before the foundation of The Creation, that we should be Set Apart (separate) and without blame (sinless) before Him in love:
Its difficult to understand what you mean?
The first time we hear about Christ in the Scriptures is in Genesis:
15 “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed.
He(Christ) will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.”
‘Before the foundation of the Creation bla bla bla“???
Are you of the opinion that the whole thing was made like a script to a Hollywood movie?
The first time we hear about Yashua Messiah is in Genesis 1:1
Genesis 1:1 (MCV) In the beginning Yah (Elohim = plural) created the heaven and the earth.
Yashua Messiah was The Creator.
Strong’s Concordance:
God – H430
‘e?lo^hi^ym
el-o-heem’
Plural of H433 Eloah
The Elohim plural which means Yah with Yah, who later became The Father and The Son, with The Father and His Son sitting at His right hand in Heaven.
Why are you poo pooing the Set Apart Scriptures. Are you saying Yah has no plan???
Revelation 13:8 (MCV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (The Adversary), whose names are not written in The Book of Life of THE LAMB SLAIN FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE CREATION.
Ephesians 1:3-4 (MCV) Blessed be the Yah and Father of our Yahavah Yashua Messiah, who hath blessed us with all Spiritual blessings in heavenly places in The Messiah: 4 According AS HE HATH CHOSEN US IN HIM BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE CREATION, that we should be Set Apart and without blame (sinless) before Him in love:
John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
John 15:16 (MCV) YE HAVE NOT CHOSEN ME, BUT I HAVE CHOSEN YOU, and appointed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of The Father in my name, He may give it you.
NO FREE WILL!!! Either it’s The Adversary’s will, or it’s The Yahhead’s will.
There are no real choices, whilst we live under the branches of the tree of the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil.
You can ‘choose’ to do ‘good’ or ‘choose’ to do evil, but that changes nothing. You’re still a fallen creature who will eventually die = the penalty of living a life of sin beneath the tree of the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil. The ONLY escape is a calling from Yah.
Is The Father Calling You To His Son Yashua Messiah?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/is-the-father-calling-you-to-his-son-yashua-anointed/
100% as per ITs self-revelation.
It was your personal description that was 100% illogical b/s.
The Truth is NEVER logical to the carnal mind.
“The Truth is NEVER logical to the carnal mind”
Thank fuuk.
Here’s an example of your spiritual truth.
The Canaanite woman’s will is predestinated to be, via random (s)election, forcibly changed from that of the Adversary to IT but at the, meeting with Jesus, changeover point the limpdick omnipotent Yah/Yah Messiah pair insert a melodramatic kick via calling her a dog (not even the Inbetweeners are as pathetically childish).
Nevertheless, after the forced change to Yah’s will, the woman has an undefined state of self will (in combination with Yah’s will), prior death, as follows:
She can, via her own limited free will, do good or evil.
Of course, (even with Yah’s will overlay now onboard) she must still die due to her affront of sin but, after resurrection, her will own will has been further force constrained, again, to preclude any further affront to God
– i e. she can no longer sin.
The woman is now , practically , a fully fledged robot with a single purpose being to worship&love the megalomaniacal, evil a-hole forever.
Undoubtedly the megalomaniacal, evil a-hole will be totally dissatisfied by such low grade love/worship from a being with, practically, no will of its own.
It is therefore very likely IT has pressed the reset button many times before and that IT will continue to do so, over&over&over.
Those robots shouldn’t feel too cocky (if they could).
A-holes worshipping a duality A-hole.
Let’s hope that Yah is an imaginary deity.
To do The Adversary’s will was a free will decision made by Adam and Eve – nothing was predestined in them to do that, nor were they forced to do anything.
The Canaanite woman was Serpent Seed, a descendant of Eve and the Serpent creature. She was not descended from Adam = no predestination on the part of Yah.
Predestination applies only to those who are Called and Chosen by Yah, no one else.
Nice trick to assign the blame on all of the following via auto install of the Adversary’s will from their inception.
No self-choice for those patsy robots, eh
It’s understanble, Yah must be out of IT’s mind with eternal boredom.
IT’s going to get very bored again when IT finds a, smallish, throng of those with IT’s own will auto overwritten (via predestination) atop the Adversary’s worshipping ITself day in/out.
But then, IT already knows this so is, in any moment,presumably, permanently bored shitless
This loop seems likely to continue from whatever “n” is now to infinity unless Yah (or Yah or whatever TF its called now) can find a way to deal with IT’s own omniscience.
ITs a fukken quandary.
Its word salad.
Adam, Eve and the Serpent did choose by free will to break the single law given, yes or no?
Prince Charles is called and selected to be Britain’s King after Queen Elizabeth,
He has no free will, because he is selected by blood lines, he is called to do it, He is a slave without free will, a robot. muah muah mauh 😭 .
He can say he doesnt want ANY of this bs yes? He prefer to live on Epstein Island….alone. Yes?
Yours are the only word salads.
I have already stated that Adam and Eve had free will before they fell, thereafter, they, and ALL THEIR DESCENDANTS, did The Adversary’s will.
King Charles is not born of Yah, so he has no free will. His anointing as King changed nothing.
For FS, stop mincing words.
If “the” truth is that Erik is a purveyor of lies about the Yahead duality just call him a serpentseed to his face.
Eric is not Serpent Seed, he’s an Israelite, of which Tribe of Israel I have yet to discover.
He’s also very confused, due to the garbage and indoctrination he has learned from the ravening wolves of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, whom he has listened to in the past.
Spit the marbles out of your mealy mouth – if he says he can, of his own free will, work to insert his name among the chosen then he is a liar.
He is not like you:
https://off-guardian.org/2025/11/06/did-ai-just-evolve-i-dont-think-so/#comment-741169
He is, by your standards, allegedly, currently, fukked.
I have no standards, and I judge no one, people judge themselves, and need no help from me. You being a great example.
You do, but they are from lower than the vilest sewer.
The Truth is not a ‘standard’ only fallen creatures have standards, people like you.
Just a little correction. It is clearly stated that no man can be saved by work. It is only by mercy.
But notwithstanding this ‘only by mercy’, I cant do different because Christ way of living simply do lead to more true knowledge and more divine experiences.
It is just much more exiting to live this life. To live a programmable digital ID machine life is null and void .
Its not the carrot of being saved that matter.
Well, the unHoly a-hole can describe itself as Holy so why not throw “merciful” in there too.
In any case, IT predetermined the chosen list of the elect to be “merciful” to prior creation.
You have nothing to do with whom IT chose to apply this mercy to, zip.
Apparently, allegedly, we are all dead in sin, you don’t magic yourself out of that condition and by implying that you do is further affront to IT.
Of course, the whole construct is simplistic b/s. How can an omniscient IT “choose” to do anything.
The entire construct is nonsense. The most childish thing to do in the circumstances would be to throw your arms in the air and start singing “Kumbaya my Lord”.
You are extremely good at that.
I am from the only tribe that is not allowed to be saved, because of our filthy feet and uncivilised habits in general.
But – As you can see in the Scriptures about the robber on the cross and the woman called dog , Jesus is always ready to make an exception for the faithful!
The reason why I am doing it, is that this way is simply the most exiting and life giving of all the opportunities.
To give is more filling the to suck.
..than to suck.
a.k.a.
Jesus
ishas always been ready to make an exception for thefaithfulelect who, automatically, become faithful at the time their election is activated.You have no faith in IT’s written predestination revelation.
You are not faithful.
You are faithless.
Enjoy it, while you can.
So you’re a Serpent Seed Dew, then?
You, apparently, already know what he is:
https://off-guardian.org/2025/11/06/did-ai-just-evolve-i-dont-think-so/#comment-741211
Only a slimy little b’stard would ask the retarded question after your statement of “truth”.
E.K and M.C. – there are now two slimy little gullible, guilty, self-centred, stupid a-holes crawling around this comment section, at least.
There are no such people as “serpent seeds”.
Adam was Cain’s father, not the snake. The Bible makes that pretty clear:
“Adam made love to his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, “With the help of the LORD I have brought forth a man.”
https://biblehub.com/genesis/4-1.htm
And it’s likely that all of Cain’s descendants were wiped out in the flood anyway. Noah’s line was through Seth, which was the sole line that survived (the wives were likely descended from Seth too)
Here we go.
“It’s all kicking off in Ukraine” announced Mike Graham just as they took the pedal off the Co-n-vid metal.
A.n.other variety of Christian cat re-enters the ring.
But, is it a “true” Christian?
Ding ding
Fukken, er, “Christian” a-holes.
Throwing the non-existence of “serpent seeds” into the ring was a bit of a Trump card, I admit.
After all that to-and-froing over who was a serpent seed and who wasn’t. Saving the best card ’til last.
I’ll claim the trick anyway.
The serpent seed thingumy is a childish non-issue.
Since, allegely, everyone has the Adversary’s will installed from inception what’s the difference between a man and a serpent seed (if the man’s name is not on the predestined list).
What trick.
There are different ways to reason about predestination. The Bible says:
Romans 10:13 — “For everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”
https://biblehub.com/romans/10-13.htm
Which is a blanket *everyone*. No exclusions. No exceptions. No checking of one’s ancestry for ‘serpent seeds’. *Everyone*.
So rather than a negative, defeatist “I can’t call on the name of the Lord, because I’m not on the predestined list” (which no human has ever read), one could equally well argue:
“I called on the name of the Lord, therefore I must have been on that list all along”
OR (perhaps more boldly):
“Of course I’m on the list, therefore I’ll call on the name of Lord”
More positive approaches. Perhaps give it a go. May even work for you too
“Perhaps give it a go. May even work for you too”
So, the big Kahuna:
1/made the predestined list prior creation
2/has the Adversary’s will installed in all fetus’
3/knows that just a few will have ITs will take the place of the Adversary’s will at the eureka predestined moment.
Unfortunately I’ve been pre-programed to realise that this is the plan of a malevolent a-hole.
It would, therefore, be impossible for me to love or worship such a character for eternity (no list entry for me).
Of course, a malevolent a-hole might just be lying that a list exists at all but, if if you really are on it, I’m sure you’ll enjoy worshipping it as a robotic a-hole since you’re character is a spitten image of ITs.
So your view of god is a ‘malevolent programmer’. Perhaps try the real one
If love were programmed, then it wouldn’t be love. A ‘robotic worship’ critique defeats itself. Your repeated use of ‘IT’ is telling.
“If love were programmed, then it wouldn’t be love”
Um:
“John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”
IT didn’t love “the World”. If IT had, the Worlds names would have been placed on the predestined list.
IT is a liar.
Your love of a malevolent a-hole is telling.
U fukken robot.
“For God so loved the world” is a mistranslation in the KJV (one of many). It should read: “For Yah so loved The Creation.”
The World is The System or The Matrix which He is coming to burn.
“For Yah so loved The Creation.”
Mmm,
John 3:16
So, we have:
1/ Yah created the predestined list (prior creation, obviously)
2/ The list contained a small fraction of those IT was to create
3/ Before IT created Eve IT decided to give her free will so, obviously, couldn’t know that she would decide to disobey IT but, on reflection, Yah realised that, since ITself is omniscient, it would be impossible to give her free will because a free will decision by Eve would make the outcome to Yah opaque which is logically impossible for an omniscient.
4/ Yah, therefore, decided to create Eve with Yah’s will installed
5/ Yah planned that at the future meeting with the Sepent that IT would install the Adversary’s will in Eve to allow her to cause great offence to IT (IT already had a great word lined up for this future planned offence “sin”).
The plan reverts to normal now:
6/ The plan would now include that all of mankind from that future “fall” time onward would have the Adversary’s will installed from inception so that the person could sin like fuuk from the getgo
7/ The plan was that the predestined list would be used in a small number of cases to change the Adversary’s will installation to that of IT’s own.
8/ This genius stroke meant that IT could now plan to kill itself some way into the creation future to bear the sin offence caused by ITs decision to initially install the Adversary’s will in those whose names IT had wriiten in the predestined list.
9/ It toyed with the idea that it would be simpler to just install IT’s will in the “elect” from the get go (obviating the need for any drama on the cross) but decided a bit of self-abuse crisis would be just what the DR ordered.
The rest is History.
It’d be great if, nearly unbelievably, you get locked away with the Yah nutjob.
Yah created Adam and Eve with free will, knowing that they would fall.
Prior to this event Yah created The Serpent Creature, evil, knowing that he would tempt, and lead astray a third of the angels, and later tempt Eve and lead her astray along with Adam.
Revelation 13:8 (MCV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (The Adversary), whose names are not written in The Book of Life of THE LAMB SLAIN FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD (Creation)
In order for Yashua Messiah to be crucified and resurrected, as planned, evil had to enter the Creation, hence Adam and Eve’s fall.
“Yah created Adam and Eve with free will, knowing that they would fall”
Bollix.
Impossible for an omniscient to create anything with a feeling will.
Free will would render the future opaque to the omniscient.
U r a fukken teat.
An all knowing Yah created Adam and Eve with free will, knowing that they would fall.
NOTHING takes Yah by surprise!!!
That is The Truth. The only problem is you cannot accept The Truth, because you have a fallen carnal mind, just the same as Adam and Eve after they fell. You’re no different.
Paul made it plain in one verse of Scripture:
Romans 8:7 (MCV) Because the carnal mind is enmity (open hostility) against Yah: for it is not subject to The Law of Yah, NEITHER INDEED CAN BE!!
Of course not, by definition of omniscience.
The attendant is that the free will of mankind cannot exist since the omniscient could not then know all future happenings
This is not difficult, repeat the following again&again&again to be rid of your shackles:
mankind’s (as in Adam&Eve’s intitial) free will is a Biblical nonsense since that would destroy the Omniscience of the Creator
You can’t have your cake and eat it.
Burn your Romper Room Bible and go do something less childish instead.
As it stands you are a total waste of spacetime.
You are not alone,
95% are gullible, guilty, self-centres, evil, stupid a-holes.
Yah being all knowing, with the ability to read people’s minds, has nothing to do with wills, whether it be free will, which no one has until they are born of Yah, or The Adversary’s will, which all carnal minded fallen people have, including you.
You’re the only waste of time here.
“Yah being all knowing, with the ability to read people’s minds”
If the person had a free will then Yah wouldn’t be able to read that mind until the point at which the person made the decision of interest.
In these circumstances omniscience becomes the description of a pipe dream, a fantasy with no basis in reality.
Zip, zilch, zero, nada.
Erik is particularly stupid but you really are a very silly, slimy wee b’stard.
One more time,
This is not difficult, repeat the following again&again&again to be rid of your shackles:
Repeat:
mankind’s (as in Adam&Eve’s intitial) free will is a Biblical nonsense since that would destroy the Omniscience of the Creator
You can’t have your cake and eat it.
One more time: NOTHING TAKES YAH BY SURPRISE – NOTHING!!!!!!
Those to whom He has given free will are known quantities = He knows them at the vibrational, atomic and molecular level, and even smaller, every last detail. He knows what we will do before we even do it!
And a ‘point in time’ is eternity to Yah. He can freeze it and analyse it forever!
I always eat my cake, every last crumb!!!
If you have children, you will know that a father has so much experience in life so he can read the mind of his children.
What they will do and how they will react. The same!
Um,
https://off-guardian.org/2025/11/06/did-ai-just-evolve-i-dont-think-so/#comment-741227
In, alleged, reality, IT planned, prior creation, that the only way that could happen would be to add the names of ALL OF MANKIND to the predestined list.
IT is omniscient/omnipotent but didn’t do that.
Rather, IT actively planned to do the opposite of what you state – IT only added the names of the “elect” to the list.
i.e. IT does not now nor ever did wish to save ALL OF MANKIND
Rather than a truth teller your statement is a simple lie.
You are a gullible, guilty, self-centred, evil, top-drawer A-hole.
Why Are There Two Resurrections?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2019/08/13/why-are-there-two-resurrections-part-1/
Not at all, there is only one explanation for predestination, and that is as the Jeremiah example. He knows us before we’re even born into this evil world.
NO ONE can call on the name of The Yahavah until The Father calls them:
John 6:37 ALL THAT THE FATHER GIVETH ME SHALL COME TO ME; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except The Father which hath sent me drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Nothing defeatist about it at all, anymore than John died in his sleep whilst the others were martyred (allegedly).
You, like everyone else, can call on the name of The Yahavah, but you have to acknowledge that you have been called by The Father in order to call on His name.
Paul also made it plain:
Romans 8:7 (MCV) Because the carnal mind is enmity (open hostility) against Yah: for it is not subject to The Law of Yah, NEITHER INDEED CAN BE!!
In my experience all those that think that they ACCEPTED A ‘JESUS’ as their saviour are not prepared to do so.
Like these reprobates here:
John 6:65-66 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that revelation many of His Learners (disciples) went back, and walked no more with Him.
All because they could not admit that they had been called. The question now is, are you going to join them?
Not disputing God’s call (which your verses do prove indisputably).
More questioning the psychological approach of an individual to the whole free will – determinism -salvation debate. The basic conjecture being that if someone genuinely, actually, sincerely calls upon the name of the Lord and hence are saved as a result, then they would have also been predestined to do so.
Free will is readily understandable to all.
– Jam or marmalade for the toast. Certainly feels like a free will choice at the time.
– Wear the white shirt or the green one. Again, seems to be my decision.
Likewise, someone can call upon the name of the Lord. Certainly seems within the basic potential of most humans to do so. Who isn’t capable of such a simple act?
A real decision. Real consequences. Perhaps eternal. If so, predestined
There is no psychological approach or free will debate, and Paul warned us about debates:
2 Corinthians 12:20 (MCV) For I am afraid that perhaps when I come I may find you not to be as I wish, and that you may find me not as you wish, for I am afraid that I will find DEBATES, envyings, wraths, strifes, backbitings, whisperings, swellings, tumults:
Do any of these trivial issues change the state of fallenness in a man or woman? NO! They are still slaves to sin doing The Adversary’s will, not their own will. It’s not rocket science!
As I said, anyone can call upon the name of the Yahavah: the acid test is whether they admit to being called by The Father – if that is the case they they were definitely predestined. If they fake it, (lie to Yah) then there will be a penalty for that. It’s called outer darkness in the resurrection.
Only predestined people are called and chosen.
Isnt this contradictory? Hearing they were called they walked away and no more with him (by free will).
If they were called they would have stayed yes?
Excuse me but this free will question is not quite clear.
I see this ‘call’ as the divine spirit we have inside us will feel dragged toward God, but as the same time tempted by and to follow Satan.
Cant people not chose Satan like Satan did chose to revolt against God?
If we are born in the image of God we could have this ability.
They’re are no contradictions in the Sayings of Yah other than those caused by the Freemason and ex-papist translators of the KJV.
Then they did The Adversary’s will and had no free will. They were obviously called but not chosen, they were seed that had no roots.
Not necessarily. Fakestream Christianity is stuffed full of people claiming to be followers of Christ, but when challenged with the question “When were you called by The Father?” They will give you a blank stare in return.
No one has a “Divine Spirit” inside of them until they are Baptised and born of Yah.
No one is ‘born’ in the image of Yah. Adam was created not born.
Genesis 4:1 Did EVE Really Say: “I have Gotten a MAN From The Lord?”:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2022/02/28/genesis-41-did-eve-really-say-i-have-gotten-a-man-from-the-lord/
You’ve bought into a revived Gnostic heresy. Goes back to Valentinus:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpent_seed
Sheer nonsense. You have run out of straws to clutch at LOL.
TWO SEEDS CAME OUT OF THE GARDEN – PERIOD!!! JUST REPENT, AND GET OVER IT!
Genesis 3:15 (MCV) And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between THY SEED and HER (Adam’s) SEED; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise His heel.
Gnostics were apostates who did not believe that Yashua Messiah was Yah come in the flesh. Some more homework for you!
Genesis 3:15 simply says that Eve’s offspring will be at enmity with the offspring of snakes. Which is borne out in common experience. Women don’t generally get along with them. There’s no hint that the snake had any human offspring. Snakes always breed snakes, at least according to my biology book.
The denial of Jesus as coming in the flesh is the spirit of the deceiver/Antichrist, not that of the Gnostics.
2 John 1:7: “For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist.”
https://biblehub.com/2_john/1-7.htm
The Gnostics held more diverse views. Their ideas are revealed in the Nag Hammadi texts and also in ancient writings of Christian apologists, such as Irenaeus.
They also influenced future heresies such as British Israelism which you also would appear to be expounding:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Israelism
https://odysee.com/@MessengerCharles:e
Genetic Proof The Dews Truly Are The Serpent Seed!:
You will find the video on this page.
British Israel is NOT AN ‘ISM’, whereas Roman Catholicism is!
Read my article in order to alleviate your ignorance:
THE DEWS ARE THE SERPENT SEED!!!
Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/
Brilliant.
No it’s not brilliant, it’s fakestream Christian explaining away garbage.
Eve”s offspring/seed is Christ who will crush the head of the snake (Satan).
How Satan’s seed will bite Christ in its heel is maybe the crucifixion and/or the oppression of Christians.
So Eve had only one descendant???
“… Christ who will crush the head of the snake (Satan)…”
Yes, there is clearly something very prophetic in those verses.
Yes Eve said that very clearly.
Its quite embarrassing for both of us that we had not read that simple verse……. 😶 .
You are fully right, and I was wrong on that point. Thanks a lot for clearing that one up for me.
Thats is precisely why I make these discussions for to learn and correct my knowledge around these things.
Thanks again a lot for your participation!
A serpent seed is a Cain born from an intercourse between satan/eve or demon/woman.
Infected dna with demon. Off course there is no saving of these.
These were erased first time in the flood.
But normal human beings from adam and eve and their seed have a choice to jump out of their ancient parents failure: By choosing Christ way.
No Charles I am not serpents seed. Beyond the above I do not buy your spaghetti theories of bloodlines and tribes and races.
It is old nationalsocialism ideology in flesh.
Spirit, please gentlemen!
There was no demon/woman just Eve and The Serpent Creature.
But you’re forgetting, or you may not even be aware of the birth of Canaan, straight after the landing of The Ark.
Canaan was the rekindling of Cain’s blood line post-Flood. This is why Noah cursed him.
What do you know about German National Socialism?
All right so via Vagabard we resolved this ‘serpent’ seed.
But what confused me and still confuse me is the evil forces here around. From Enoch’s book (for some reasons this book is left out) we know fallen angels took room down here before the arch and maybe after.
So my impression was that we had two species here, and this would also fit into the present plans of gene modified lab babies.
But I have to read up on this again from the start.
I only know Seth continued Abel’s line.
Let us leave the national socialism case to another day.
I find the heavenly issues much more interesting and important for the time being.
The demons (spirits) that were the Nephilim were imprisoned by Yah at the time of The Flood, in chains of darkness, their physical bodies drowned in The Flood. Spirits cannot be killed:
2 Peter 2:4 (MCV) For if Yah spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;
This is then combined with those who were Cain’s descendants, who also perished in The Flood, all except Naamah (Noah’s wife) who was the sister of Tubal-Cain.
Yes, there are 2 species, the sons of Adam, which includes chosen Israel = mankind. Then there’s The Serpent Seed from Canaan = hu-man kind.
The sons of Adam have the spirit which is in all men, The Serpent Seed do not have this spirit. They therefore cannot be born of Yah!
Job 32:8 But surely there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding.
This is what Jesus says that we are too sinful to be invited, only by his sacrifice and mercy we can be renewed to our destiny.
But I think we all mean the same. Do we choose the righteous way or the wicked way? This is what Jesus is about and talk about.
Its a non-constructive struggle of words. Time for a little music:
https://youtu.be/SjShJaCsqLg .
Eu não jogo mais conversa fora.
Dessa vez me decidi,
Seu caso é complicado
E não tem mais conserto.
Quer transformar a minha vida
Em uma novela de tv
Onde o ciúme é o dono da situação.
Tô de saco cheio,
não dá mais pra aturar.
A sua maldita obsessão,
Eu bem que tentei por várias vezes conversar
Mas você só vinha com quatro pedras na mão.
Meu amor arrume as malas
Que eu vou viajar
Tchau good bye pra voc
Nova York, Cuba, Toquio pra qualquer lugar
bem longe de você.
https://lyricstranslate.com/en/Banda-Calypso-Tchau-pra-voce-lyrics.html
Keep on dreaming, by way of the Adversary’s will and inferring IT to be a liar.
The “elect” are chosen by IT – you choose nothing, nada.
NO ONE IS INVITED – PERIOD! A calling is NOT AN INVITATION.
“Many are invited but few are selected“.
Where does it say?: “Many are invited but few are selected“. Scripture and verse, but not from the toilet paper called “The Message.”
Directly from the Greek original:
Matthew 22:14 (CLT) For many are the called, yet few are the chosen.
So you are nitty picking again. Yes this is the verse from the wedding symbolic.
Not at all. Do you think Baptism and the gifting of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit is symbolic????
I.t. i.s. a. p.a.r.a.b.e.l. !!!
10 So the servants went out into the streets and gathered everyone they could find, both evil and good, and the wedding hall was filled with guests.
11 But when the king came in to see the guests, he spotted a man who was not dressed in wedding clothes.
12‘ Friend,’ he asked, ‘how did you get in here without wedding clothes?’ But the man was speechless.…
13 Then the king told the servants, ‘Tie him hand and
foot, and throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’
14 For many are invited, but few are chosen.!
Some editions says ‘invited’ (new, standard) and older says ‘called’.
Only YOU make it BIG, BIGGER, THE BIGGEST problem!
I repeat again, IT IS A PARABEL!
Baptism and the gifting of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit is a Parable???
I thought it was an instruction:
Acts 2:38 (MCV) Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be Baptised every one of you in the name of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS, and ye shall receive the gift of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit.
However, as you have brought up the subject of the wedding garment, here is my article on that very subject:
Matthew 22:1-14: Who Was The Guest Without A Wedding Garment?…
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2022/10/04/matthew-221-14-who-was-the-guest-without-a-wedding-garment/
Off course we have.
The Fear of God is Utmost
12 And by these, my son, be further warned: There is no end to the making of many books, and much study wearies the body.
13 When all has been heard, the conclusion of the matter is this: Fear God and keep His commandments, because this is the whole duty of man.
You have to make a choice by free will for the above yes?
These are exhortions to the Israelites, under the Old Covenant to obey the commandments = Yah’s will, which they could not keep and disobeyed, for they could only do the Adversary’s will.
Nothing to do with free will, as none of them had free will.
What is free will then?
Something given to those who are born of Yah, and no one born prior to Yashua Messiah, with His death and resurrection could be born of Yah.
I refuse to be collectively in ANY deep soup with Liberals. Close your eyes and swim, and shut up.
Oh yes, nothing thwarts Yah’s plans for His Creation.
Psalm 2:1-5 (MCV) Why do the heathen Dews rage, and their people, their shabbos goys imagine a vain thing? 2 The kings of the earth (Prime Ministers, Presidents, Politicians and Popes) set themselves, and the rulers (The Rothschild Dew banksters) take counsel together, against The Yah, and against His Anointed Yashua Messiah and His Elect, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4 He that sits in The Heavens (The Father and Yashua Messiah) shall laugh: The Yahavah shall have them in derision. 5 Then shall He speak unto them in His anger, and torment them in His sore displeasure.
Excellent article but not for the common man.
Ley me say it that way, if AI cant give me love and cant give me feeling, it has to go and find somebody else! Susi Qautro https://yandex.ru/video/preview/1821212655999330903 .
AI costs too much for some.
Hedgie (@HedgieMarkets): “🦔Meta is hiding $30 billion in AI infrastructure debt off its balance sheet using special purpose vehicles, echoing the financial engineering that triggered Enron’s collapse and the 2008 mortgage crisis. Morgan Stanley estimates tech firms will need $800 billion from private credit in off-balance-sheet deals by 2028. UBS notes AI debt building at $100 billion per quarter “raises eyebrows for anyone that has seen credit cycles.” The Structure Off-balance-sheet debt through SPVs or joint ventures is becoming the standard for AI data center deals. Morgan Stanley structured Meta’s $30 billion in an SPV tied to Blue Owl Capital, making it easier to raise another $30 billion in corporate bonds. Musk’s xAI is pursuing a $20 billion SPV deal where its only exposure is paying rent on Nvidia chips via a 5-year lease. Google backstops crypto miners’ data center debt, recording them as credit derivatives. My Take This is 2008-style financial engineering repackaged for AI. The key difference from the dot-com era is growth was financed with equity then. Now there’s rapid capex growth driven by debt kept off balance sheet. When chips estimated to last five to six years may be obsolete in three, and companies structure deals where their only exposure is short-term leases, that’s hidden leverage creating the opacity that preceded past crises. Meta keeping $30 billion off its balance sheet while UBS warns about $100 billion quarterly AI debt buildup shows the pattern I’ve been documenting where leverage accumulates outside traditional visibility. Hedgie🤗” | nitter.poast.org
The “innovation” does appear to already be contained within the prompt. In the use of the word “only”? The “only” implies its having no affect on cells where there was no ‘interferon’. AI merely expanded on the ‘only’ word.
As I understand it, AI works via probabilities. It gives the answer with the highest likelihood of truth. It rarely gives no answer at all. If it doesn’t know the answer then it “wings it”.
If there was nothing in the literature to justify choosing ‘silmitasertib’, then it may simply have guessed. There was a 1 in 4000 chance of selecting silmitasertib. Silmitasertib will amplify this ‘interferon’ and not affect the other cells. Who’s to say otherwise without testing it?
Anyone can dish out a hypothesis eg that Martians always have blonde hair. It requires people in the real world to test its validity.
If AI did actually guess right on this occasion, it doesn’t mean it will necessarily guess right on the next. Not evolution imho, it likely just got lucky.
Apparently an “I don’t know.” update to AI is in the works (the ‘hallucination’ reference seems particularly disturbing):
ChatGPT5:
### 🤖 Technical Side (Why Wrong Answers Happen)
– **Probability-driven outputs**: AI doesn’t “know” things in the human sense. It predicts the next word based on probabilities from training data. The “top of the probability pile” is usually chosen as the best guess.
– **Confidently wrong answers**: Because the system is designed to produce fluent, plausible text, it will often generate something that *sounds right* even if it’s factually wrong. This is sometimes called *hallucination*.
– **Why not just say “I don’t know”?**
– Some models are being trained to do this more often, but it’s tricky: if they say “I don’t know” too frequently, users get frustrated.
– The balance is between **helpfulness** (always giving an answer) and **accuracy** (sometimes admitting uncertainty).
– Newer approaches use confidence scoring — if the probability distribution is too flat (no strong answer), the model can be tuned to say “I don’t know.”
”Spiritualists are content to say that humans have souls and God-given freewill and therefore humans are different from machines.”
No. In essence, humans are souls, not their continually changing material bodies. Freewill is only given as an explanation in Christian religion, which is not made by God but by men.
Of course humans are different from machines, and as humans we have spiritual attributes like God, reason and conscience (logic and morals).
Machines can’t think, there’s no morality in them, there’s no life in them.
Living things are necessarily different from nonliving.
”Descartes set in motion the idea that what we call the “spirit” or the “elan vital” can neither be proven to exist nor analyzed.”
This is not true. Descartes was a genius, and he proved the existence of God with logic.
Descartes’s arguments are called the trademark argument and the ontological argument.
For something to exist, and we do know something exists, there must be something that existed before something that exists now existed. We know with absolute certainty that we as individuals were born, therefore our individual selves had a beginning. Whatever has been born, didn’t always exist. Things that always exist can be called absolute, objective truths.
To deny truth exists is illogical.
Descartes proved with absolute clear thought the existence of the Creator.
But we can only understand his arguments if we can think clearly, abstract thoughts in our mind.
So we must not focus on anything constantly changing, like things in the world, but we focus on absolutes like truth.
Truth must be the basis of everything, because if there’s no truth, there can’t be anything logical, reasonable, trustworthy and so there can’t be any knowledge. Only truth is knowledge.
As God is the absolute Truth, allknowing and always existing, God is clearly the beginning of everything and everything ultimately points to God.
Also, we as divine beings have direct access to God. This can be demonstrated in your life, if you truly pay attention to God.
God gives proof of God.
Materialistic arguments are basically and completely wrong, when they think human beings are their bodies, and they believe everything is material, without spirit. But truth, for example, is not material.
How could you be your body? It doesn’t make any sense to think that there’s no you, the soul that is always present and unchanging no matter how your body is changing. When your body regenerates itself or something is wrong with it, it doesn’t change who you are. You are not your body or any of its parts. You really can’t be the cells or bacteria in your body.
However, your body, or simply your finger, is proof of God. Whatever is created is not the creator. You are not this article you created, but you are you. The question is, who are you.
When you ask that question, the Spirit will answer.
One of your best comments Hv. Bravo!
“Je pense, donc je suis”.
Descartes distinguishes between six fundamentally distinct passions; wonder, love, hatred, desire, joy, sadness.
All the others are either composed from some of these six or they are species of them.
—Descartes, Passions of the Soul, article 69
Passion: https://youtu.be/T7JoW7h6SoM
“One more time my heart is forgetting everything you did,
I do return to this insane love without thinking, to start over again, already knowing the end,
but this is passion, and with passion there is no explanation, it is only to deliver yourselves into it and see what happen, and I always end up involving me with you.
In my depth I cannot live without you, I am crazy about you, I love you.”
The ONLY proof of God (whatever God means) is Love.
Love does not require any religion.
It simply IS.
You’re very near to The Truth!
The obvious argument or case against artificial intelligence is that it is, well … artificial.
Artificial means something that is made by humans, often as a copy of something natural, or it can refer to something that is not sincere or genuine. Examples include artificial flowers, artificial behavior, artificial thought made manifest via advanced covert neurowarfare, or the criminal technocracy/transhumanist control freaks’ #1 favorite Wet Dream: artificial (digital, central bank digital currency, cryptocurrency, Stablecoin etc.) money enslavement of the masses.
The late Japanese scientist Michio Kushi (1926-2914) warned about the coming of transhumanism (artificial humans), and the serious existential choice humanity faces, 41 years ago, – in 1984.
See: https://onenessofhumanity.wordpress.com/2025/11/03/japanese-scientist-michio-kushi-1926-2014-predicted-the-transhumanist-future-in-1984/
Good day and good luck.
ps.
He wants to replace Bolshevikipedia. He has the finan-
cial means to do so, then hopefully finally without the
constant begging for donations. From then on, it will be:
“Elon is watching you (trust me, I am pure objectivity).”
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/25/ai-models-may-be-developing-their-own-survival-drive-researchers-say
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/elon-musk-launched-grokipedia-heres-how-it-compares-to-wikipedia
The physical senses can notice exactly similar observations between people, labeled “objective”, in the physical plane, basis for Sciencific speculations. The occult senses can notice roughly similar observations between people, labeled “subjective” and in the astral dimension, because no two people are exactly the same, in the same state, the same moment or place.
Both should be called emperical.
No such thing as AI.
Clever algorithms, sure.
Created by humans.
Correct, with limitations and firewalls to stop you from accessing truth.
Try questioning the official narrative of 9/11 or vaccines. AI quickly becomes AS Artificial Stupidity. Or BS Bullshit
Pending purgatory back with a vengeance?
We should as ourselves why, given that the way in which computer based AI (LLMs) are constructed renders them reducible to an equivalent Turing Machine and therefore subject to the same limitations as apply to Turing Machines, we believe such things are capable emulating the human mind when even we don’t fully understand how our minds work. See Roger Penrose’s “The Emperor’s New Mind” and “Shadows of the Mind”.
The immune system is a medical term.
There is no such system; the East calls it the lymphatic system in your deluded medical science terms.
The immune and fighting is madness.
The body does not fight, everything is in balance.
Western military division called medicine needs to sell catchphrases of sickness to tell
people that they need protection because something is attacking them! ( Think COVID )
and ( Immigrants ) is the same mind control application used to justify protection and attacking to ‘heal’ from a fake invisible.
The Church does the same with possessions and unbelievers.
Correct: There is no such thing as an immune system, the term is merely an extension of the adversarial legalistic system applied to the human form. The lymphatic system also is a part of the ‘clean-up’ squad of the so-called ‘immune’ operation, ‘as in ‘you don’t have to pay the bills.’
What we are trying to codify here is PURELY The LOVE we have for this life and its vicissitudes. How PURE is our LOVE? It is an index/indices, an attempt to describe something INEFFABLE.
We will all have to answer for that, sooner AND later.
Women do make birth with pain yes? Men do hard work to make food yes?
If we do not take care we get wounded, bleed, we break bones,m.m.
Children develop child deceases from within, red dogs, measles, sheep sickness, etc., said to ‘improve their immune system.
Even in natural environment you are exposed to malaria, mosquitoes, some spiders and snakes are toxic and you can die. If you eat soil you can die, I have a friend who got his stomach smashed by foreign milk bacteria (Egypt), m.m.
We need to name call this in some way, and I dont see anything wrong in calling it immune system.
Some has a weaker system (vaccinated), some has a stronger system (un-vaccinated)
What questions should we be asking? What can AI do, or not? Or what are we doing to ourselves?
Cognitive Impairment Is Skyrocketing Across America
Mass Neurotoxic mRNA Uptake + Widespread Artificial Intelligence Dependence = A Generation Losing Its Ability to Think.
A case of the old GIGO (Garbage In Garbage Out) methinks.
Ai cannot have a ‘Eureka’ moment because it operates on pure logic.
There is no oxygen for the creative spark, whatever that is, or means.
Descartes of course had it back to front.
It should be; ‘l am, therefore (unfortunately) I think’
That is to say, we OVERthink, and that is where all our problems begin.
A state of thoughtless-ness is when the creative spark ignites into a supernova.
We’ve all had those moments. We should nurture them.