3 Tips for Checking Whether a Medical Study is Legit or Bullsh*t
Tools to help you learn to quickly sort out whether a paper is solid or shaky.
Rosemary Frei, via her website
You’ve just watched a video of a high-profile, Covid-sceptic speaker saying that shedding of the spike protein from vaccinated people endangers those they come in close contact with. You want to find out more, so you look at one or two of the links under the video that provide source material for what the speaker said. (Great those links are there; most videos don’t have them.)
Or a friend who is a believer in the official narrative about Covid has sent you a news item with a scary headline about the Indian ‘triple-mutation new variant.’ You’re pretty sure the article is very misleading, so you want to check out the study it’s based on.
How can you find source material and — if and when you find it – try to quickly figure out whether it’s legit?
Because there’s a huge, hot complicated mess of claims and counter-claims out there. And unfortunately there’s misleading information coming from ‘experts’ on both sides of the Covid divide.
And this isn’t unique to Covid. As Scott Adams — who created the Dilbert cartoon strip and now is a pundit — points out in page 14 of his book Loserthink:
One thing I can say with complete certainty is that it is a bad idea to trust the majority of experts in any domain in which both complexity and large amounts of money are involved.”
So I’ve put together three tips to help you quickly discern whether a medical paper is meaningful or meaningless. I’ve distilled the tips from my decades of reading, writing and editing scientific and medical papers.
- Tip One: Is key information left out or hidden?
- Tip Two: If the source material is a study about the effect of an intervention, does the study measure serious illness or death in humans, or is it on animals or theoretical, test-tube models?
- Tip Three: Does the study contain the information that the article or video referring to it says it contains?
*
Tip One: Is key information left out or hidden?
You’ve very likely seen the April 30, 2021, news article from the Salk Institute. It’s titled, ‘The novel coronavirus’ spike protein plays additional key role in illness.’
Its subtitle is, ‘Salk researchers and collaborators show how the protein damages cells, confirming COVID-19 as a primarily vascular disease.’
The article has been weaponized to bolster virtually every Covid-related viewpoint. For example, many news reports about it – such as this one – claim that the Salk paper provides yet more proof that Covid is deadly, and also shows that Covid exerts its action via the spike protein attacking blood vessels.
And many other pieces – such as this video – say that it demonstrates yet another way mRNA vaccines are injuring and killing millions of people.
Here’s how you can easily and quickly check whether this paper is solid.
It’s easy to find the study: here’s a hyperlink to the study in the second paragraph of the Salk article. Click the hyperlink, and you’ll see the study, which is on the Circulation Research journal’s website.
But – ugh – it looks complicated: the title is ‘SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2.’
Don’t despair. It turns out it’s easy to figure out whether the paper is full of holes or not.
Scroll down through the study.
First, you’ll see that in the study the researchers created an artificial, spike-protein-coated, viral shell (and didn’t put any RNA into the shell). Then they place a number of these viral shells into each hamster’s trachea, which is the top of the windpipe leading to the lungs.
So this is very far removed from meaningful studies involving humans. See Tip Two for more on this topic. (Note also that the study wasn’t at all related to injection of mRNA or to vaccines — so it’s a real stretch to extrapolate from it to what could happen in people who have receive an mRNA jab.)
Then scroll down more, and you’ll see this bombshell:
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study, including statistical analyses and reagents used, are available from the corresponding author upon request.
(‘Corresponding author’ refers to the person who’s the contact for responding to queries about the study.)
Whoa! You have to write to one of the study’s authors to get key information about the study?! That’s a whopper of a red flag.
I wouldn’t send this Salk news article and accompanying study – or videos or articles making assertions about them – to others.
Not unless you want to: email the study’s corresponding author asking for the missing data/material, receive the material, analyze it and determine whether it holds water. And the very fact that one has to do all that is enough to conclude there’s something very suspicious going on.
And by the way, there are many other ways of hiding critical information. A very common one is burying the key results in supplemental tables or charts. [‘Supplemental’ is a term for information that’s not included in the main paper but instead is in a separate document or documents.]
To find a current example of this, because I know it’s extremely common, yesterday I went to the medRχiv website, scrolled down a bit and clicked on ‘View by Month.’ Then I clicked on the title of the paper at the top of the list that came up.
That paper was published May 20. It’s on how airway antibodies reappear after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. I scrolled down and saw it only shows the abstract – that is, a summary of the study. [There’s also other info under the abstract, including a ‘Funding Statement’ that says the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was among the funders of the study. That’s a big red flag.]
To look at the full paper, I scrolled back up to the top of the page and clicked ‘Download PDF’ on the right-hand side. Then I looked at the ‘Results’ section of the PDF of the paper. Sure enough [after skipping the first section of the ‘Results,’ on ‘Patient enrollment, assessment of disease severity and timeline,’ which in fact is part of the methods rather than results (sigh)], I saw that the reporting of key results is largely in figures and tables in the supplemental material. So a person would have to click on the supplementary-material hyperlink, download the material, and then search for and examine the figures and tables with the key results.
How many people have time or inclination to do that?
*
Tip Two: If the source material is a study about the effect of an intervention, does the study measure serious illness or death in humans, or is it on animals or theoretical, test-tube models?
We’re constantly being told that a particular ‘treatment,’ ‘vaccine’ or ‘public-health measure’ is saving lives. And that a ‘new variant’ or ‘viral-escape mutation’ is very deadly.
But such claims are meaningless unless they are objectively, verifiably, shown to be true.
So for starters, they’ve got to be studied in people. Not in mice or monkeys, nor in test tubes or petri dishes (AKA ‘in vitro’).
And those human studies have to focus on whether the interventions reduce serious illness and death, or whether things like the ‘new variants’ increase serious illness and death.
Serious illness and death are ‘hard outcomes’ – where the tire hits the road. These are definable, measurable/quantifiable and clinically meaningful. ‘Soft outcomes’ are things like antibody levels in the blood, and relatively minor complaints like coughing, fever, fatigue or a headache.
(One additional caveat: even if papers are on humans and study serious illness or death, they probably are skewed in some very significant ways. Virtually all medical studies conducted in at least the past three decades have been funded by an organization or company with financial and/or political interests. So studies are set up to produce results that further those interests.)
By way of examples, here are two papers that supposedly provide ‘proof’ that the Indian ‘triple-mutation’ new variant dubbed B.1.617 is highly ‘transmissible’/infectious and, by extrapolation, very dangerous and deadly.
These papers aren’t easy to find: the vast majority of pieces on the Indian ‘new variant’ don’t provide primary-source material.
The first paper was posted on the website of the online journal bioRχiv on May 3, 2021, titled, ‘Convergent evolution of SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations, L452R, E484Q and P681R, in the second wave of COVID-19 in Maharashtra, India.’
Here’s what the paper’s authors wrote about the approach they used to figure out whether the new variant is more ‘transmissible’:
For assessment of the noted mutations on binding to neutralizing antibodies, the SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD domain complexed with two selected mAbs REGN10933/ P2B-2F6 were retrieved (PDB ID: 6XDG; resolution 3.90Å and 7BWJ; resolution 2.65 Å respectively)[15][16]. Point mutations were carried out using Biovia Discovery studio visualizer 2020 and the structures of the complexes were subjected to energy minimization using macro model tool in Schrodinger 2020 using default parameters. The molecular interactions between the RBD-ACE2 interface, within the RBD and between the neutralizing mAbs-RBD[,] were analyzed using non-bonded interactions tool in Biovia Discovery studio visualizer 2020.
Translation: the study was done in artificial conditions in vitro using highly complex methods, equipment and computations.
You can’t get more removed from real life than that!
The second paper was posted on bioRχiv on May 5, 2021, titled, ‘SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.167.1 is highly pathogenic in hamsters than B.1 variant.’
The study was done with 18 hamsters. And the scientists didn’t even attempt to see whether this ‘new variant’ actually moves between hamsters faster than other forms of the novel coronavirus or any other virus, and/or sickens and kills more of them.
So these two studies tell us virtually nothing about whether the Indian ‘new variant’ is more dangerous in humans than other forms of the novel coronavirus.
*
Tip Three: Does the study contain the information that the article or video referring to it says it contains?
For illustrative purposes, I’ll use this tip to tackle the topic of ‘spike-protein shedding.’
This is the theoretical scenario in which a person receives an mRNA shot, makes copies of the spike protein in their cells, releases a sizable number of these copies into the environment, and then large quantities of the spike-protein copies enter the body of someone nearby.
One group that’s fanning flames of fear surrounding shedding is America’s Frontline Doctors. On April 26, 2021, the group released an ‘issue brief for citizens, policymakers and physicians’ on complications after Covid vaccination.
The third section of that issue brief is titled, ‘Can the unvaccinated get sick from contact with the vaccinated?’ The section is crammed with claims about damage that occurs in people after they receive the mRNA vaccines. But it has only one hyperlink to source material. That hyperlink is in the second sentence.
Here’s that whole section (I’ve added bolding for emphasis):
The vaccine produces many trillions of particles of spike proteins in the recipients. Patients who are vaccinated can shed some of these (spike protein) particles to close contacts. The particles have the ability to create inflammation and disease in these contacts.
In other words, the spike proteins are pathogenic (“disease causing”) just like the full virus. What is most worrisome is that a person’s body is being suddenly flooded with 13 trillion of these particles and the spike proteins bind more tightly than the fully intact virus. Because of the biomimicry (similarity) on the spike, shedding appears to be causing wide variety of autoimmune disease[s] (where the body attacks its own tissue) in some persons.
Worldwide cases of pericarditis, shingles, pneumonia, blood clots in the extremities and brain, Bell’s Palsy, vaginal bleeding and miscarriages have been reported in persons who are near persons who have been vaccinated. In addition, we know the spike proteins can cross the blood brain barrier, unlike traditional vaccines.
But note again that there’s just one primary-source paper for that paragraph/section; it’s hyperlinked to the word ‘shed.’ The primary-source material is a study published online on September 1, 2020 in a journal called SN Compr Clin Med (the short form for Springer Nature Comprehensive Clinical Medicine). Its title is, ‘COVID-19 and its Modes of Transmission.’
The paper is about indirect and direct modes of transmission of Covid. But it does not mention vaccines, vaccination or injection of mRNA at all. Therefore it doesn’t back up the claim by America’s Frontline Doctors that people who receive Covid mRNA vaccines shed the spike protein.
While we’re at it, let’s look at whether there’s any primary-source material that does support the ‘spike-protein shedding’ claim.
One document that’s being used by a lot of people to try to support the claim that shedding occurs after Covid vaccination is a November 2020 Pfizer document that details the protocol for Pfizer’s Covid-vaccine study.
The focus of all that attention is the first part of subsection ‘8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy,’ on pages 67 and 68 of the document. Subsection 8.3.5.1 reads as follows (bolding added by me for emphasis):
An EDP [exposure during pregnancy] occurs if:
- A female participant [in the study] is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
- A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
- A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
- A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
- A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
The term ‘study intervention’ in this document refers to the Pfizer Covid vaccine.
The section is saying that someone can be ‘exposed to the study intervention during environmental exposure,’ and that that ‘environmental exposure’ is via ‘inhalation or skin contact.’
But how can people make the leap from there to saying that the Pfizer-protocol document is referring to the following theoretical sequence: people receiving the mRNA jab, spike protein being made in their bodies, the spike protein spreading into the environment and then the protein entering the bodies of people nearby (and then making them ill)? There’s no basis for that in the document.
Unfortunately, some prominent people are making that leap a lot, and misquote the Pfizer document to make it match what they’re claiming.
For example, Dr. Christiane Northrup says in a May 21, 2021, video:
If you look at the Pfizer document from the very beginning, on page 67 it actually says that ‘no male should be impregnating a woman for seven weeks, and no female should get pregnant for seven weeks,’ and they say right on there because of ‘skin contact’ or ‘sexual contact.’ So you have to ask yourself, what did they know, or do they know, that they’re not telling us?”
She must be referring to page 67 of the Pfizer protocol document, because as far as I know there’s no other document about Pfizer’s Covid vaccine that discusses pregnancy and exposure/transmission, at least not one that discusses them on page 67.
Another example of Northrup misquoting the protocol document is this May 20, 2021 interview of her, starting at 3:30.
I found the first clue to what this section of the protocol is much more likely to mean by simply looking at other parts of the Pfizer document. For example one page later, in the last paragraph of subsection ‘8.3.5.2, Exposure During Breastfeeding,’ it says (bolding added by me for emphasis):
An exposure during breastfeeding is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE [serious adverse event] associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.’
That mention of ‘exposure’ in this paragraph seems to refer to ‘a Pfizer drug’(eg, vitamins).’
So could all the sections in the Pfizer protocol relating to ‘exposure’ from the ‘study intervention’ in fact be using boiler-plate language be referring not to shedding, but instead to people coming into physical contact through the air or another mechanism with the study drug?
That seems the most likely explanation to me.
I searched online and, indeed, this does seem to be Pfizer’s boilerplate-like language.
For example, if you look at section ‘8.10. Exposure During Pregnancy’ in the 2015 Pfizer protocol for its study of dacomitinib (a drug for non-small-cell lung cancer), that section reads (bolding added by me):
For investigational products and for marketed products, an exposure during pregnancy occurs if:
1). A female becomes, or is found to be, pregnant while receiving or having been exposed (eg, because of treatment or environmental exposure) to the investigational product, or the female becomes, or is found to be pregnant after discontinuing and/or being exposed to the investigational product;
An example of environmental exposure would be a case involving direct contact with a Pfizer product in a pregnant woman (eg, a nurse reports that she is pregnant and has been exposed to chemotherapeutic products).
2). A male patient has been exposed (eg, because of treatment or environmental exposure) to the investigational product prior to or around the time of conception and/or is exposed during his partner’s pregnancy.
It has a reasonably strong resemblance to the section on exposure during pregnancy in the Pfizer vaccine protocol document. (And it’s not at all likely that a cancer drug sheds.)
So the only conclusion I can draw is the Pfizer-vaccine protocol document doesn’t provide any sort of support for the concept that people who have received Covid mRNA shots are shedding the spike protein and spreading it to others.
And the fact that America’s Frontline Doctors attempts to support its assertion that Covid mRNA vaccines cause shedding with a paper that has nothing to do with vaccination indicates that there is not any evidence this can take place.
Using very shaky ‘evidence’ to try to ‘prove’ something suggests that in fact there’s probably no proof of it at all.
I do think the vaccines are dangerous and are negatively affecting people who’ve received them; I also believe that people who’ve been in close contact with vaccine recipients can be negatively affected.
There are plenty of plausible reports of, for example, altered periods in women who have been in the vicinity of people who’ve been vaccinated. So altered periods are quite possibly related to being in close proximity with vaccinated people.
But there’s zero proof, as far as I’ve seen, that the spike proteins produced by the mRNA jabs cause those altered periods.
Maybe it’s something else in the shots that’s resulting in all the negative effects in people who’ve been in proximity to individuals who’ve had the jabs. Or maybe perhaps it’s not something in the shots, but somehow another phenomenon associated with receiving the shots.
At the moment it’s very hard to know. Chasing misinformation just makes us go down blind alleys and delays or even permanently stops us from finding the truth.
Spreading information that has extremely flimsy grounds also gives significant fodder to our opponents to paint us all as spreaders of lies. That turns many people away from listening to what any of us are saying.
It also makes people on our side support the physical and emotional separation of Covid believers/pro-vaccinators and us (which is exactly what the architects of the Covid coup want).
For example, Dr. Larry Palevsky at 41:00 in this April 27, 2021, video says people who’ve received these vaccines “should be quarantined and have a badge on their arms that say[s], ‘I’ve been vaccinated’ [i.e., like Jews were marked by yellow-star badges in WWII] … so that we know to avoid them on the street … and not go near them anywhere in society.”
The bottom line? Try to resist the pull to believe an article or video just because it fits with your Covid-sceptic view and is from someone you reflexively trust.
You can use the three tips in this article to work toward staying objective and figuring out for yourself whether there’s solid evidence behind claims made by ‘experts.’
Trust yourself. You can do it.
Rosemary Frei has an MSc in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary, was a freelance medical writer and journalist for 22 years and now is an independent investigative journalist. You can watch her June 15 interview on The Corbett Report, read her otherOff-Guardian articles follow her on Twitter and read her website here.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
This is good stuff. The trouble is, when one checks an msm source material shared from a covid cult friend, subsequently manages to call it out for stretching truth or severely twisting the data/definitions/effectiveness, they cannot be swayed.
The only part of their humanity left is empathy with those suffering from covid. If you can get through to them by highlighting such visible jab ADR examples slipping into mainstream media, personified with individual stories, not overall figures. As well as the collateral damage plight of millions, then they can be open to more dialogue. You will fail trying to connect at a rational common sensical level. It has to be base human emotions, they are still in there somewhere even when it feels like the minds of your loved ones have been “captured”.
Thanks for all your work OffG and thanks to all the posters here that share so much information I am often unaware of.
Perspectives on the Pandemic | “The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine” | Episode 13 Remastered – YouTube
Shaky ? Certainly Scary.
Stephanie Seneff – COVID Vaccines May Bring Avalanche of Neurological Disease (mercola.com)
Here is a really basic fact that no one seems to point out
The PCR tests are useless to diagnosis Sars CoV2 per peer review
So ALL research studies that utilized PCR tests for diagnosis of Covid-19 infection (basically all of them including vaccine trials) are fatally corrupted and invalid
It is interesting that so many alternative sites go on about the tests but then hold up research using these tests as if these studies are valid
They aren’t
Additionally, all test for diagnosis of Covid-19 are non specific and developed without virus isolate
The CDC admits it has no virus isolate
All this talk about the virus escaping from a Chinese lab doesn’t address the fact that the entire foundational story is based on computer modeling and monkey RNA used for isolation research with no definitive timeline or source of origin
Covid appears very much to simply be a disease of attribution to other causes
Early autopsies of 2020 spring deaths showed bacteria infections
This really isn’t that complicated but they have us all so spun with alternative media putting out stories on medication therapies and China lab leaks, we lose track of the basic core problems with the ENTIRE story
More issues with isolation on the testing and isolation discussed HERE:
https://www.unite4truth.com/post/contaminated-covid-19-tests-millions-removed-from-market-implicated-in-india-black-fungal-outbreak
and here
https://www.unite4truth.com/post/on-virus-isolation-method-non-specific-covid-19-tests-new-drug-treatments-for-covid-19-infections
A lot of people have been saying things like they’ve never identified the virus or isolated it and yet that don’t square with public information (i.e. that don’t make it true but it means you can google it).
What was reported way back in january of 2020 is that China “released the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus” to the world (no pun intended).
It’s worth nothing this information is being reported in connection with questions being raised how Moderna could’ve developed a vaccine within two days of China ‘releasing the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus’????? Inquiring minds want to know.
Victorian “outbreak” 9 people with the sniffles. Shut down suburbs, vaccination blitz LOL. Get the picture…
FYI: Same hype, different day? Beijing says US reporter pushing Covid lab-leak theory also fueled debunked Iraq WMD narrative
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin took aim at Michael R. Gordon, a national security correspondent for the Wall Street Journal and one of the authors of the report that added fuel to speculation about Covid-19’s lab origin.
“Not long ago, Michael R. Gordon, an American journalist, by quoting a so-called ‘previously undisclosed US intelligence report,’ hinted [at] a far-fetched connection between the ‘three sick staff’ at the Wuhan lab and the Covid-19 outbreak,” Wang said at a briefing on Friday.
https://www.rt.com/news/525738-lab-leak-iraq-wmd-china/
https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2014/08/03/beware-the-new-york-timess-michaelr-gordon/
Well spotted. Con-19 is a mare’s nest from the same stable as Con-911.
Since last week’s Highwire’s segment about the alleged magnetic properties of the Megadeath Virus of Doom pseudo-vaccines is being referenced again, I’m repeating this relevant comment, with minor editing:
I watch “The Highwire” regularly, and generally appreciate Del’s perspective and hard work; I hope Del recovers from his indisposition and is back soon.
That said, FWIW I don’t feel unconditional positive regard for Del; I can’t resist admitting that it was a pleasure to watch interim host Jefferey Jaxen reporting without Del’s excessive, even incessant, interrupting, talking over, crowding, and smothering Jefferey.
More to the point, I also am strongly inclined to believe that the reports of magnetized or magnetism-sensitive vaccine sites are worth taking seriously and investigating; that is, I assume that there may well be a “there” there.
Still, I respectfully dissent from the praise for Highwire’s man-on-the-street magnetism test. Like many of the independent individual videos allegedly “proving” the phenomenon, the “experiment” was presented too much like the typical social-media stunts that are all the rage nowadays. Even calling it a “challenge” seems tawdry and cheap to me– reminiscent of the “Pepsi Challenge” or the imbecilic “ice bucket challenge”.
Even though my assumption is that there’s something to it, I was disappointed by the low-road “vox pop” approach. These casual extemporaneous demonstrations don’t withstand skeptical scrutiny; the challengers might as well have been street magicians pulling quarters out of astonished volunteers’ ears.
So far, apart from Highwire’s segment and several individual videos, I’ve also seen many familiar scamdemic and vaccination critics in the medical profession (e.g., Drs. Tenpenny and Cahill, etc.) more or less taking the phenomenon at face value and speculating on its cause. But even they seem to be relying on collective or cumulative ad hoc video evidence.
I wish that the Highwire had reported the phenomenon, but instead of “taking it to the streets” had commissioned a qualified professional to at least conduct a more organized and rigorous demonstration. A proper long-term study seems appropriate, but in the meantime a researcher could assemble a representative group of subjects vaccinated with all of the extant “vaccines” at specified points in time, and systematically test them under identical and consistent conditions.
To me, this beats the hell out of a party atmosphere with onlookers hooting “You’ve been chipped!”, and with random volunteers who may or may not be wearing sunscreen, etc. It may help to foment the buzz, but it smacks of cheesy demagoguery.
Yesterday an acquaintance was vaccinated with Moderna, today we were on a terrace and he told me that the spoons stuck to his arm. We have asked the waiter for a fork and I have verified by myself at least ten times that it stuck to him, not in the other arm and I, who am not vaccinated either. True. I have told him why the “authorities” deny it and he has remained with a cow face looking at a train, I have told him not to wear the second one, that this is very strange and he has answered that he is going to wear it. My wife, with a dose on, has seen it, and I have seen her with a pissed-off face. And she asked me for the first time. I have explained a little. She has always refused to listen.
Spoons!? Please, take a video! A2
Where is Uri Geller when we need him?
Slightly off target but why is the odd response I pen undergoing a spam check?
Well, there are a lot of videos out there, but I will. It is better to check it out for yourself, with one who is convinced. It is mind-blowing. I don’t know what this means, but it leaves you baffled.
Oh Pleaaaase is that the best you can do, trying to persuade us all to tell our friends about this spoon nonsense, something they can easily test and see for themselves is not true, then they turn round and call vaccine refusers crazy, is that the idea ?
This is another problem we’re up against:
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-begins-mass-extermination-program-of-americans-children-aged-12-to-17-implementing-eugenic-population-control-measures-through-covid-19-bioweapons/
Health Impact News asserting that the ‘vaccine’ is a “Bioweapon”, out to reduce the population of the world. So what will the parents of these children do if/when their children start dropping like flies? Stand by and watch it happen?
Isn’t it enough that the CDC, the WHO and Big Pharma (let alone the political classes) have every incentive to frighten us into accepting the BS they’ve been pedalling, so why resort to calling the ‘vaccine’ a Bioweapon?
There’s not a shred of evidence to back up Health Impact News’s allegation and it tars us all with the same brush!
[Isn’t it enough that the CDC, the WHO and Big Pharma (let alone the political classes) have every incentive to frighten us into accepting the BS they’ve been pedalling, so why resort to calling the ‘vaccine’ a Bioweapon?]
Agreed. When deliberately alarmist phrasing is used (as did governments as well), the messenger immediately earns my scepticism.
Talking of not letting conformation bias blind you to the Truth and falling for controlled opposition tactics, I’m deeply skeptical of the whole blood clot narrative, I’m naturally skeptical of anything the mainstream media “fesses” up to. Personally I think the side effect of the vaccine is an exaggerated auto immune response, ie when you encounter whatever it is that gives people cold or Flu or any other condition, your immune system will overreact and possibly kill you, this was what all the papers on the RNA altering therapies were previously saying.
I think the blood clotting issue is relatively minor, which is the reason the MSM don’t mind talking about it, as long as when people start dropping dead from exaggerated autoimmune responses in upcoming cold and flu seasons, they can blame it on some new super variant of covid, they’ll be happy.
I think its one of the reasons they are so desperate to have everyone vaccinated, because otherwise there will be a very clear divide between the vaccinated getting very sick and the non vaccinated being just fine.
No, it’s real, and it’s much worse than they are telling us. I know of 3 who’ve died from blood clots within 2 days of the jab, one who has had a massive stroke about 5 weeks after and one wiht a blood clot in his leg 1 day after.
I didn’t say it wasn’t real, I’m just saying I don’t think its the main or intended side effect. I’m saying that I think the mainstream media is talking about it, to distract from the main side effect, exaggerated auto immune response, which they hope to pass of as deadly covid strain x. So people think “well it cant be the vaccine because those side effects are rashes and blood clots” I believe Blood clots from the vaccine are a sizeable issue, amongst many other side effects. just not the main one. And that we need to stay alert to that and not allow them to focus solely on the blood clot issue.
Good point. Alex Jones infowar has not covered magnets jab yet.
Dark, Dark, Man Chris Witty confronted in the street accused of lying, but won’t answer any questions about the recovery study, he is asked whether they have isolated Covid but won’t answer and also of manipulating figures etc. The guy asking questions says ” I’ll see you in court”!
A must watch on David Icke Headlines.
Valuable article, thank you.
Tip 4: If a mainstream or liberal funded site doesn’t have a comments section, they’re reading from a playbook.
Tip 5: if they do have a comments section and it’s all agreements and praise, it’s bots. Actually, if a mainstream or liberal funded site is in existence, don’t waste your time.
Tip 6: If you got your information from a Google link in the first 20 pages, forget it.
Tip 7: If the production of the video you amassed knowledge from is expensive and slick, don’t bother.
Tip 8: If it comes from your TV set, don’t bother unless it’s the current temperature outside or a game score.
Tip 9: If the news you read or watch use the terms Race, Systemic, Existential, Sustainable, Privilege, Homophobe, Xenophobe, Climate Change, Pandemic… they’re lying or insane.
Tips 6 and 9 are wrong (I like the gist of your comment generally though).
[Tips 6 and 9 are wrong (I like the gist of your comment generally though).]
Tip 9 is not 100% correct, but certainly a good indicator that the article may contain significant amounts of biased “information” (I support your freedom to express your view though).
Excellent additions.
Tip 7 is spot on. So many of those “horrifying” vids were slickly manufactured with concerned talking heads sharing the same vocabulary and voices breaking down with stylised emotion and computer graphics and that all pervasive doleful piano music etc.
Tip 9 also good. I’d add: surge, spike, and tsunami along with such phrases as “off the scale” and “I’ve never seen anything like this before!”
“Breaking point” one of their favorites.
[Tip 9 also good. I’d add: surge, spike, and tsunami along with such phrases as “off the scale” and “I’ve never seen anything like this before!”]
And another present favourite: “unprecedented!”
I thought Ms. Frei’s article was thought-provoking. And the number of comments bears that out, many of them thought-provokng as well – I almost always learn a few things here.
Now, my thoughts:
In the end TPTB (government, corporations, the banking industry, the media, the tech industry, Big Agra, the pharmaceutical companies, et al.) do not care about us as individuals because they don’t see us as individuals. To them, we are the lumpen proletariat. We are a giant blob commonly referred to as humanity. And this whole vaccination campaign proves it, beyond a reasonable doubt. It’s one size fits all. Do they give a thorough medical exam before administering the vax? I don’t know for sure because I haven’t had the shot and I hadn’t thought of asking those I know who got the shot. But, I’ll guess that they don’t examine people other than to possibly ask, do you have a fever, a cold, a cough? But as most of you probably know, humans, biologically at least, are much more than a set of symptoms, or lack thereof.
Most people look to these corrupt “institutions” (no longer just government or corporate entities) and the individuals that run them as god-like saviors. And so, they buy into the fraud thinking they’ll be protected and consequently hand over their freedom in exchange for what they perceive as security (paraphrasing Ben Franklin here), when they are actually being exploited.
What is to be done? We must be compassionate – and advertise this fraud widely. Just because they don’t give a damn about us, we have to show, sincerely, that we care about ourselves and other people, regardless of superficial differences which seem to have been blown out of all proportion by the media. And we do this by unmasking their fraud wherever and whenever we can.
thorough exam before any vax? lol!
Absolutely nothing about this virus or the vaccine adds up. Think about that. Don’t try to rationalise the irrational.
Excellent article, and apologies for the length of this post but I believe this is a very important issue.
It is probably not realistic to expect the average citizen, even intelligent and generally well informed ones, to analyze and vet lengthy and detailed scientific expositions on inherently complex issues.
I do agree with the writer’s premise that nontheless it is our obligation to either do this, or if we are unable, DO NOT simply propagate information whether we know it to be true or false (classic propaganda – maybe where the word came from) just because it fits our own narrative. Avoid the trap of confirmation bias.
Sometimes it is relatively easy. Early in the scamdemic there was a covid meme going around that the virus was DEADLY lethal as it would attack key organs – heart, kidneys, lungs, liver AND cause neurological (brain) damage.
Truly frightening. At the time I was VERY skeptical but still not sure what was going on. So I took the trouble to track down a major source of this “information” – ADVISORY BOARD. Sounds kinda like a government/research board hmm ? No, it’s a health industry mega-corp. They are invested in vaccines. So if the referenced research panned out (validly or not) it would stand to see stocks rise significantly.
In the article :
“A separate study of 416 hospitalized Covid-19 patients in China found that 19% showed signs of heart damage, and those patients were more likely to die. According to the study, 51% of patients with heart damage died, compared with 4.5% of patients who showed no signs of cardiac injury. Doctors are trying to determine whether the damage
to patients’ heart muscles is caused by the new coronavirus, itself, or if the damage occurs as a result of other symptoms of Covid-19, such as pneumonia and inflammation, (emphasis mine)”
Yes I think it might be relevant to have some evidence of specific covid-19 causation – pneumonia and inflammation are generalized conditions that occur in many respiratory ailments.
An excerpt from another study cited in this article :
“All neurologic manifestations were reviewed and confirmed by 2 trained neurologists. Major disagreement between 2 reviewers was resolved by consultation with a third reviewer. Neurologic manifestations were categorized into 3 categories: central nervous system (CNS) manifestations (dizziness, headache, impaired consciousness, acute cerebrovascular disease, ataxia, and seizure), peripheral nervous system (PNS) manifestations (taste impairment, smell impairment, vision impairment, and nerve pain), and skeletal muscular injury manifestations. Impaired consciousness includes the change of consciousness level (somnolence, stupor, and coma) and consciousness content (confusion and delirium). To avoid cross-infection during the COVID-19 outbreak, we had to minimize patients going out for examination. Therefore, the diagnosis of nervous system manifestations mainly depended on the subjective symptoms of patients and the examinations available…(emphases mine)”
The patients said they feel bad, so of course they must be suffering neurological damage. That seemed unscientific to me. I also wondered how the third reviewer resolved the “major disagreement” – coin flip, rock/scissors/paper ?
You may notice that most of the symptoms used for attribution of neurological impairment to covid-19 would also apply to common cold or flu most of us have suffered over the years. Yet the serious finding of organ damage and neurological disorders was based on verbal reports of the 214 patients in the study.
I am not a professional scientist but I didn’t need one for my nostrils to flare like opening parachutes and sniff…I did check with an actual scientist friend who did a spit take of her coffee in my face.
A possible ameliorative strategy is set out in Chapter 11 of Steven E. Koonin’s recently released book Unsettled about serious problems of misrepresentation of data in climate science. But his idea of establishing “RED TEAM EXCERCISES” for truly important scientific issues could have general application in a world where, sadly, we simply cannot trust representations of “The Science” by media, political entities, NGOs, and even scientists themselves. All these players have vested interests – political, organizational or financial, in conclusions regarding problems of global import.
The idea is that a Red Team of independent, preferably retired, volunteer scientists – with no direct involvement in any funded research on the topic at hand – would be tasked with objectively analyzing, questioning and pointing out any perceived defects in methodology, data, or conclusions. The “Blue Team” would be those scientists or institutions on the “pro” side of such scientific “conclusions”.
Of course, the sine qua non for this to be of any value is that the Red Team is truly independent, objective and without vested interests.
I would be interested in the writer’s view on Mr. Koonin’s proposal.
Well reasoned comment. Which possibly explains the downvotes. You refrained from using terms like “evil psychopathic corporate fascists.” That often gets the votes.
[Of course, the sine qua non for this to be of any value is that the Red Team is truly independent, objective and without vested interests.]
Having observed my fellow humans over too many decades, I have some reservations about the “truly independent, objective and without vested interests” part.
It is probably not impossible, and I have observed occasional instituted bodies start out being such. Sadly, I can not at the moment think of one that stayed that way.
Maintaining the “purity” of the Red Team(s) is the nub of it.
But given the state science seems to be devolving in – sort of a controlled religion where scientific “conclusions” are turned into divine revelation by vested interests – it is at least worth a try ? I was hoping someone from the scientific community might comment on logistics and practical issues involved in its implementation.
Well made point which shows the root of bad science from the get go.
Rosemary Frei was calling Cahill a shill on twatter
Seems fair.
[Rosemary Frei was calling Cahill a shill on twatter]
That doesn’t sound nice of her. I very much appreciate what Cahill is doing, although I do think she has also occasionally pushed at least one of her ideas harder than warranted.
Yes, I understand she maybe feels she has to inflate something somewhat to get through to some people – but that is also what governments did. If I dislike that from governments, I can not now change my principles just because I like Cahill being mostly “on my side.”
This article leaves me wondering…Coleman had nowt good to say about frei. Its a murky cesspit alright
‘You’ve just watched a video of a high-profile, Covid-sceptic speaker saying that shedding of the spike protein from vaccinated people endangers those they come in close contact with.’
…..
I didn’t watch the video for this very reason. I’m not going to be worried about a fckin ‘virus’ or fearful of being in contact with people whether they have been injected or not.
And what of people who have natural and acquired immunity by infection?
Immunity by infection of what? The vast majority of people are born with a functional immune system I thought. Give the necessary medical care/help to the tiny percentage of vulnerable people who don’t? I know quite a lot of people,though I still don’t know anyone personally who has succumbed to The Virus. I’ve heard only a couple of ‘via-via’ anecdotes.
The vast majority are not borne with functional immune systems. They take time to develop and often childhood vaccines.
Oh crikey! Whatever did we do before vaccines? Oh that’s right, we all died. Of course! Silly Mother Nature and her daft evolution stuff, neglecting to give us any means to survive naturally.
Sure, right now in the world lots of infants die before they’re five. Surviving that period is the best single bet they have for getting a full life-span. But remember: this is happening to the present population of the Abused and Deprived Eighty Percent of the world’s people – the ADEP – who are kept artificially in their bad condition because they – and their looted homelands – are obliged to be the source of the gross excess wealth, stolen constantly from them to supply the wealth-heaps of the gangsters-in-charge – the gics – of the imperial armed-robbery system that keeps this whole stinking shitshow in place.
In recent times, it’s suited the gics’ calculations to keep a Pampered Twenty Percent class – the PTP; us! – in their stronghold richer states, to service their need for slightly fatter cattle to run the modern iterations of their robbery rackets, as doctrine-entranced gic-servants.
This arrangement is now changing, as the world barrels into the early period of the Long Descent away from hitech industrial civ, and the gics start fortifying their control systems, changing the way they do their rackets to suit the changing circumstances. Because of this, they’ve started defenestrating a steady stream of ex-PTP bourgeois into the growing ranks of the ADEP. We being now in the time of the historic end of economic-growthforever, and thus increasingly surplus to the changed gic requirements: When times grow lean, deprive the plebs first, before any diminution of the gics’ dragon hoards can be allowed, in the slightest.
We shall be learning to live without vaccines again, soon enough. Probably no bad thing, since we do have the natural means to defend our health already on board our bodies at birth, given a ha’pporth of chance. I’ve got to going on eighty-one without ‘benefit’ of vaccines, ever.
[…the wealth-heaps of the gangsters-in-charge – the gics – of the imperial armed-robbery system that keeps this whole stinking shitshow in place.]
Oh my. School-level rhetoric.
But it gets you your upvotes. And that is a scary thinh for me to observe.
Oh well. Let me at least commend you on how well you played to the gallery.
Mother’s milk provides the natural immunity. Not the vaccines.
[Mother’s milk provides the natural immunity.]
Yes, indeed it does! I find that one of the most beautiful things of the immune system.
Of course it is much strengthened the closer the mother is in contact with the infant.
My curiosity was sparked when I read that “immune system” was, and still is, a myth. So I searched and found the explanation of the immune system. The article said that the immune system was mainly the lymphatic system, supported by the circulation system, and muscles….. I stopped right there, for I knew what would it all be: the circulation system and muscles should all be supported by other systems and/or organs which should be supported by other system and/or organs etc etc. In the end, what’s called the “immune system” is the whole body with its systems, organs, etc. What a joke, I must say. Decades I’ve been fed with lies. If not for covid, I might not know it all. Viruses, immune system, contagion, cholesterol, salt, etc, all lies.
Wrong! The mother passes some in the womb, then more via breast milk but most comes from acquired immunity, by catching it! A good example is Chicken Pox (Shingles in your old age), which is why vaccinating against Chicken Pox is a bad idea. I caught it as kid and have never had the Shingles vaccine (I’m almost 76) and I’ve not caught Shingles (yet). Apparently, being around kids who get the Chicken Pox when you’re an adult reinforces your immunity, another reason not to vaccinate children. And, the immune system remembers infection, the ‘memory’ is stored in your bone marrow.
The issue here, is pollution, bad diets etc impair the immune system. Nature spent millions of years evolving the immune and capitalism comes along and fucks it all up! Glyphosate (Roundup) is the perfect example.
[The vast majority of people are born with a functional immune system I thought.]
Yes, the majority of us are. But even amongst us lucky ones, our immune systems are not infallible pathogen-destroying “killer machines.”
If you understand something even as simple as somatic hypermutation you will know why that is the case.
[I know quite a lot of people,though I still don’t know anyone personally who has succumbed to The Virus. I’ve heard only a couple of ‘via-via’ anecdotes.]
Same for me. However, at least two ‘via-via’ people were remote family members that I have just never met. And they are dead now.
https://www.artsenvoorvrijheid.be/blog/2021/06/02/getuigenis-het-vaccin-was-volgens-de-dokter-gevaarlijk-voor-de-patient/
Translated with http://www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Testimony: the vaccine was dangerous for the patient, according to the doctor
I am an assistant to 2 persons with a muscle disease. During November 2020, 1 of these persons (risk patient) had corona. He suffered from a “little scourge” for one week and was soon back to normal. The other resident and the rest of the entire care team strangely enough tested negative. To this day it is a mystery where he got the covid as he never went outside during that period.
Six months later, they asked the family doctor to test them for antibodies. The GP was not very keen, but at my insistence this was done anyway. He told us, ‘After six months, there will hardly be any antibodies left, so get vaccinated anyway’.
The result was not unexpected for me. The maximum number of antibodies is 250 that they can measure in the blood. The patient had more than the maximum number that can be measured. The doctor’s e-mail literally says, ‘So vaccinating now would be very dangerous’.
As if by fate, he received his invitation a few days later. I phoned the vaccination centre and they confirmed the same thing. Vaccinating now is downright dangerous!
If I had not insisted on antibody testing, the patient would have taken the vaccine in full confidence with all the consequences afterwards! It is incomprehensible to me that this is concealed and that people are not first tested for antibodies before they are given a vaccination. An overreaction of the immune system can lead to autoimmune diseases that can even result in death.
I would like to take this opportunity to warn everyone. We have all completely lost faith in the vaccination campaign. We are choosing not to be vaccinated.
If people do want to be vaccinated, please have them tested for antibodies first. That is a very important point that I want to make!
Absolutely! I caught the bug last December and two GPs have told me getting inoculated is NOT a good idea.
Do not get vaccinated. Simple. Nothing adds up.
To answer my earlier query about the odd “retreat” of the media viral propaganda, I read a review of Vernon Coleman’s Coming Apocalypse which is written by one “Kirsten” and includes this bleak prophecy:
So perhaps the damage has been done, the time bomb laid?
Governments don’t want everyone to be vaccinated. The vaccinations are a tool of division, where the mainstream media promote vaccination while the alternative media publish the scare stories. It’s divide and rule. Apparently, half of British adults have been fully vaccinated – don’t expect that’d percentage to budge much. Remember 52:48 Brexit referendum.
They haven’t really started on the 18-30 group. It is my opinion that by the end of the Summer 80-85% of UK adults will have accepted the offer of both jabs (and some elders may well be on “boosters” by then).
That is the level of compliance us critical thinkers have to push against.
Mind you, at the last London demo, it was heartening to see more young people pushing back.
My 24 year old has decided to turn down the offer, thank goodness.
Hah! So you’re equating Brexiteers and vax-notters? Be interesting to see if you’re correct.
Ok… Here’s an example of a lengthy scientific study. >
The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice
Published: 16 December 2020
The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice | Nature Neuroscience
There are also 59 published studies detailed at the close of the article. Wonderful…
Question 1.) How many persons in civilian populations have the time or educational experience to sort out this level of chaff?
Question 2.) Why do civilian populations continue to produce hundreds and hundreds of Dr Frankenstein’s year after year? Isn’t one more than enough?
Question 3.) Why do we need 400+ bio-warfare labs to make us feel safe from other bio-warfare labs?
[Question 2.) Why do civilian populations continue to produce hundreds and hundreds of Dr Frankenstein’s year after year? Isn’t one more than enough?]
It is in our genes.
A way was found to ameliorate the “hundreds of Dr Frankenstein’s” effect. In short: never give government too much power.
That lesson seems to have been largely forgotten.
Hello suddyan: The tendency to produce Frankenstein-like offspring may well be in our genes. However, it’s up to the parents of such children to shape their functional behavior. The functional behavior can be modified. Genetic tendencies should be left alone…
When critical child rearing decisions are delayed or left to the remote realities of public education or government, it is much too late to “correct” the behaviors.
Civil populations need to take back control of their private lives and grow up.
https://www.rt.com/news/525618-flu-strains-extinct-covid-lockdowns/
There – all this s^^t was worth it because maybe a couple of strains of flu have been killed off. Although some have seen their pictures on the side of a milk carton.
This was an really good one.
Thanks and not much to add.
Apart.
Of course.
Sometimes it do happens that one forgets why one started to realise that the only way to counter whats called Officiality, liberal fetishism, etc, was to hammer back, no use of been nice all the time so why not be an assh…. more often, than perhaps circumstansial interferences in the force, probably, hehe, highly lightly, thought was rightfully necessery.
But then again, nothing invigorates reactions lik been kicked mentaly in the nutts..
No I do not regret, nope, non.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3Kvu6Kgp88
I may remind people that this isnt something new, its the norm, and just to use another term, reproducuiability, and transparency, becase its about OUR health after all, but due to corruption, its not.
You wounder why religions talks about Greed, as evil.
Greed is known for another one thing to, its universal, knows no boundarys, infact its an cancer on our humanity, if you want them to rule you, because they somehow deserve that, you will loose, we will loose.
There is no choise of democrasy if we dont have the God given right to say NO.
Thats it.
I dont either waist time on the hunt for an origin, this have been scattered around the globe for centurys, sometimes they go global sometimes they dont, and the hysterical RepubliCONs along wih the Military Ind. Complex, with their payed minions, thru an media they own, this reaks of Chines hate propaganda and nothing else, then we can start to think about whom is that have an motive, huh.
The scam is falling apart, he lies exposed, they know we know, but our problem remains, the cencure, the MSM, whom giudes the public and the senatwhores and politicians whom sucks to anything that have an taste of cash.
peace
[I dont either waist time on the hunt for an origin, this have been scattered around the globe for centurys…]
Erm, mikael, if viruses can now be easily created in a laboratory, I suggest you had better start “waisting” your time thinking how we humans must live with that eventuality going forward.
Here’s a link to an article from globalresearch.ca which suggests “self-spreading vaccines” are being considered – but are not here yet.
In the meantime, I believe Ms Frei’s article says far more than she intended. What it says – and I think pretty clearly – is that this god-like human creation called “Science” is very very far from being what it’s touted to be. Science cannot and will not solve all our problems; nor will it ever satisfactorily explain cosmic phenomena. What it will do is destroy all life on this planet if left unchecked.
A Gypsy card reader has about as much chance of predicting the future as a laboratory filled with scientists.
‘Self-Spreading’ Vaccines Pose Multiple Risks to Society — Including the End of Informed Consent – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization
Delta variant 30-100% more transmissable says Neil Ferguson in Fraud lead.
Not one of the harder ones to call on the legit or bullsh*t front.
Is Sly Stallone taking the lead?
Yes I was unfortunate enough to see some ranting twohat on Question Time last night saying the same thing. Shameless, lying bastards.
Great article. Nuance and anti-fanaticism need be reminded, especially since there is a good portion of commenters who wish harm upon thr jabbed, forgetting that the adherents to the narrative are humans too, misled and abused. Unity will get us through this. And she makes the exact point, precise and short, when she says that THIS IS AT WHAT THE COVID COUP AIMS, A TWO-SPEED SOCIETY/HYGIONOMIC APARTHEID. The other reason why I like her articles here is because she reminds us to be critical, especially with the proliferation of the targeted and eroding theory of “leaky vaccines” whose only logical conclusion is to either get jabbed yourself to protect yourself from an “escaped stronger mutant variant” or at least to become ewually hypochondriac as the covid-fearful but for the reverse reason, which again leads to Apartheid. Be critical and remember that mistrusting authority and capitalism is a virtue.
Poor Piece IMO.
eg The “Shedding” claim. Debunking a “source” specific to the claimer, not the claim.
which leads to a cherry picked peice with a similar example of a poor source.
But where is the actual claim examined? How wide a search did the author perform to discover…
Crickets…
go watch the latest stream from “JC on a bike” youtube channel before YT take him down (he’s currently on a 2 week suspention from streaming) He’s a neuro Biologist. He covers the latest claims of shedding from one of the guys who discovered the mRNA technique Dr Byram Bridle (timestamp about 37:55 for the Dr Brindle coverage)
look in the description for links to JC’s paper (60 references) and note the papers he sites in the video as they are the latest published research in the last 2 weeks since JC et al wrote their paper.
I’m not saying it’s a slam dunk “shedding is kosher” conclusion, science isn’t black and white, but the path is laid bare and it’s a significant smoking gun IMO.
Note within 12 hours of Dr Brindle making these claims, there was a website registered in his name supposidly debunking these claims, clearly a professinal hit site was made in record time (looks like it was funded by Canadian Gov since it redirects to “scienceupfirst” )
sorry No links, I’m not playing spam filter roulette anymore nobody checks it.
https://youtu.be/V2dM7RRav1w?t=3421
Perfectly backs up Rosemary’s article.
Do you make it hard to get at key information? Yes.
When you seek out that information, does it actually say what is claimed? No.
Another red flag for me: people saying you should watch something “before YouTube take it down”. Promotes the “you have a privileged opportunity to be in the know where other people aren’t” idea, rather than proper rigourus debate.
[Another red flag for me: people saying you should watch something “before YouTube take it down”. ]
Not a red flag. YouTube censors. And that includes things that was against the orthodox narrative that later turned out to be correct.
Very good point and post…certainly seems at best disingenuous in places,this article.
This devaluates all what was said prior. It is like comparing apples with oranges. Because negating the “Hystheory” of protein shedding, while stating that it’s maybe something else, is backing the claim by those, who report adverse health reactions in people that were/are in close proximity with the injected ones.
Discrediting the fact that this is happening by alleging it can’t be the “vaccine” – that is not a vaccine by a long shot – is discrediting the people who report such “phenomenon”. That those who have experienced, or are experiencing this “phenomenon” would jump on anything to explain what happened/is happening to them should be a no-brainer. If nobody knows, it is moot to allege what it is not.
Only a thorough investigation will shed light on the “phenomenon”. But the naïvety of the belief that those, who are behind all this bullsh*t – killing hundreds of thousands via injections – would not have added “whatever it might be” to kill as many flies with one swatter, does not only not help, it is unable to end any “hystheory” about the reasons for the “phenomenon”.
Krishnamurti once said that the biggest problem people have, is to stick to the “what is”. What is – what is happening this very moment? Answer: “People are dying that shouldn’t be dying from a pure medical pov.” That does of course not include a metaphysical pov, which will say that everybody has their own moment of death – no matter for what reason.
The deception is wholesome. Argueing about what may, might, could, may not, might not, could not – will not stop the program. It is more helpful to focus on qui bono. What would be revealed with some enhanced interrogation of those who profit beyond imagination from this event/program?
I found a variant in my cellar yesterday.
I call it “The Cellar Variant”.
Everybody in my street is terrified.
Keep the bottle on its side. Apparently it ages better.
I’m safe – I don’t have a cellar. It can’t sneak up on me.
I wouldn’t be so sure Howard. There could be a cellar variant which mutates into a fridge variant….the cellar-fridge hybrid variant….which could turn into a deadlier, more transmissible household appliance variant. ‘It’ is everywhere- we cannot hide from ‘it’.
Rosemary, I am not sure where you are getting at. You are making the case that it is easy for anyone to make the difference between potentially good, bad or fraudulent scientific contribution with 3 easy steps. But deceptive science has become very good at this game. Then you use this pretext to offer somewhat of your own scientific opinion on those criticizing the “vaccines”. Yet, your presentation and argument is not very clear, but you argue that vaccines do pose risk, but not for the shedding associated the spike protein. Yet, you don,t give us your own juice. Are you going to make the case that the Covid “pandemic” is misogynist in nature and is a patriarchal invention to perpetuate violence against women…?
Scientific propositions can be bad sometimes simply because of the way they look at a problem. For example, I started follow some web sites which were hoping to create databases which would point to bad science (somewhat of scientific fact checkers). But even them had difficulty doing so except for the outright frauds.
Let me show you an example from:
Retraction Watch at https://retractionwatch.com/2018/09/17/what-really-happened-when-two-mathematicians-tried-to-publish-a-paper-on-gender-differences-the-tale-of-the-emails/
My Observations (notice, when I comment on science, I usually always post warning about my non-expert status).
Denys Picard
says:
September 24, 2018 at 2:21 pm
I am not sure if the text was retracted for political reasons (cultural war), or because it was considered weak…while the premise seems an amusement for the mathematicians…it lacks in biology knowledge to make it an interesting read…Mathematical juggling not being enough. Two important consideration should have the authors take the opportunity to revisit their subject. 1) Status: People are selective in mating individually and communally. The more primitive the organisation of the community, the more mates were chosen not by the individuals themselves, but by the community, this community approving or rejecting the associations. Further, females seek status in their mates, and so do males. Further, the occupation of women in parenting had them work in community doing very similar chores. For this reason, similar status women must have had more similarity. While similar status men could endure greater differentiation since their chores could create competitive advantages around differing physical-biological characteristics. 2) Recently, it has been determined that high immuno-resistant individuals have a tendency to mate instinctively between themselves.
Considering these 2 points could increase your chance of finding more authority in your current article.
(I am not an academic, just an interested reader)
In a little reply to the down vote, if it is the author or editor. Why is this article bad…because despite the credential of the author an MSc in Microbiology, and being a canadian…The fact that we must rely on human models for much of decisions currently, is because scientists have have time to do Experiments acceptable for peer reviewed publication concerning something as sophisticated as the spike protein. Animal models may be badly structured or inadequate sometimes (like for diabetes Rat were used to study ketoacidosis, when eventually scientist observed that the mice model was better because the ketonic metabolism of mice was closer to humans than that of Rats). When animal models are well used, they can lead to great advancement. But for Covids most complex feature, scientists are now left with Clinical observation of humans which are presented in clinical observation papers.
Further, conflict of interest stands of presentation have grown to create so many loopholes in what constitute a conflict of interest, regarding either the Conflict of interest statement of a paper, or its funding is not of great help. Even papers funded exclusively by NIH (National Institute of health, USA) have demonstrated dubious back funding sources.
And again, as for most of my contributions everywhere, my article was trapped for a small while in the Spam filter (most other places it never appears, so at least the OffGuardian staff fixes problems quickly)…but this author herself appear to be spamming, because she seeds a subject where the answer can only be found on her own blog:…”What she thinks of why the vaccine(s) is or are bad”.
Thank you for your patience…
Sorry to be such a spoilsport…but, when all the animal trials are done and all the miraculous breakthroughs are submitted to mankind…will the mice, rats, hamsters, ferrets, cats, dogs, monkeys deemed worthy of being used for our benefit, benefit in any way, shape or form from these great wondrous miracles?
(Didn’t think so.)
Quite apart from the fact that – as well as being monstrous abuse of these animals – the ‘animal modelling’ doctrine is close to being complete, pointless, ineffective bollocks. One of the idiot unexamined false beliefs of our time.
My Bullshit radar goes of the wall when someone uses words like ‘Seems to suggest’, ‘Appears to give’, ‘We believe it shows’, ‘Initials findings suggest’………in relation to scientific looking literature or media mouthpieces giving their opinion on such subjects.
Such words of qualification do not sit well with science.
as well it should, these are the terms of ‘scientism’, lysenkoism and propaganda..
or as as you succinctly stated..
‘bullshit’…
The Popes of the inquisition have been replaced by the Popes of Science. In some ways Science is far worse.
There is a new Doctrine of Scientific Infallibility, aka “The Science is Settled”.
corporate science is basically science jargon fed through a marketing dept and into the public
The attached link isn’t a medical study, but a timeline from The Age rag (Aussie equivalent of The Guardian) of the discovery of the allegedly supposed super contagious Delta variant, which is now obviously in Melbourne. Obviously.
At least according to Health Officials anyway who also reported 7 more “cases” here today.
Just wondering – is this variant related to the Bulgarian variant? And to be honest, I’m not quite sure how much more fear they can stoke? When is a daily tidal wave of fear enough? They’ve been at it like the Duracell Bunny on steroids, non stop for the last 14 months here.
When Daniel Andrews, the now missing in action Victorian Premier said several times last year that: “the covid normal will continue until every Victorian is vaccinated”, he obviously meant it.
It’s all pretty predictable and transparent.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/victoria-covid-live-updates-restrictions-ease-for-regions-melbourne-starts-second-week-of-lockdown-20210603-p57xrh.html
and still under the “emergency measures” bullshit till Dec 15th, 2021. They still have a bill to go before parliament for an extension into 2022. Scary shit!!
Whatever rights anybody had are now becoming obsolete.
I hope ya well, btw.
I know. The usual suspects will dutifully line up yet again and vote for the extension. I just read a book about living in occupied Paris during WW2 and how the main character is involved in the resistance and trying to avoid the Germans. We can probably relate.
I saw this coming last October after the last lockdown, and saved a fair bit since and have ample food at home, so yeah, enough to last 4-5 months at least.
Yes I’m starting to feel like that guy in “They Live” all the aliens staring at him whispering “he can see” into their watches. John Carpenter was a genius.
John Carpenter is awesome!
Initially, the “free world” could pin disieases, bad culture, even natural disasters on the Third World or their enemies. Now that the shoe is on the other foot (some countries are tracing variants to them), they have moved the goalposts again, renaming the variants using Greek letters.
And they’ll keep moving the goalposts and keep locking down and keep coming up variants and all sorts of absolute bollocks… until a very sizable majority are vaccinated.
Over the last ten months,I’ve spent over 40 days in hospital. Old man issues.
Not once have i had a PCR test, nor have i been asked to have one, or needed to provide clarification of who I’ve meet or been with.
Over the road (testing station) people line up like zombies in a possession of endlessness.
A mind set of “this is my future and i don’t know why”
It’s a conundrum that’s been here forever.
This link is only to emphasize the extend of the deception. Whether this is an Iranian news outlet, or not is not possible to figure. Any news outlet that quotes “bellingcat”, “the syrian observatory for human rights” and other known msm fake news must be in the fold of the deceivers. Sad, as it clarifies that no news can be trusted any longer. Leaving only ones eyes and ears – seeing and hearing what is happening surrounding these senses. The why remains elusive.
https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/06/04/658233/Australia-COVID-variant-Melbourne-Delta-
Ironically, we knew this would happen before it happens. Critical thinking is akin to premonition.
Yep, it’s an Iranian news site. I only skim read the first few paragraphs. Same same everywhere. It’s like there’s a headquarters somewhere disseminating the same scripts for all media. I’ve read the theory that all Govts across the world are in on the scamdemic, but one thing is for certain, I don’t believe any MSM anywhere now.
I actually have an outspoken Iranian friend on FB, tho he keeps getting banned by them. I went to ask him his opinion just then… but he’s suspended again. I only trust about 6 alternative sites now, including this one.
It’s justa reprint. All thinking has ceased.
The German site “KenFM” is now under STASI surveillance. Stasi, because that’s what Gelen’s “Verfassungsschutz” (“Constitutionprotection”/”NSA”) has always been. I just wish more articles would be available in other languages, because the people writing for the site, or being interviewed are stellar.
Here is the “international” segment with selected articles translated into English:
https://kenfm.de/kenfm-international/
Another site is “Rubikon”. Excellent analysis and opinion pieces – also only in German, if not translated by somebody. All content is free to re-distribute, absent any changes in content or license.
I missed this comment… Appreciate those links Not, cheers. My smartphone (I know, sigh) actually translates foreign languages, well at least it can translate French into English, so obviously it’ll do German as well. I’ll have a read of these articles after dinner, then catch up on a few videos.
Regards your Press TV comment below on food security, like I said to someone else, it’s like there’s one headquarters somewhere churning out all the press releases and doom laden scamdemic mongering and distributes them to all these media organisations from all over the world. Including in Iran.
This is exactly hat it looks like, Gezzah. Which brings me to ask the only remaining question:
How do we get the Pyongyang News? Wouldn’t it be interesting to see what they are publishing? Seems they are the only true outsider on the planet. Thanks to their nukes, I guess.
However, considering the “media”, we indeed already have a global regime.
Ha, ha, ha, I found it and their reporting is very thorough:
http://www.pyongyangtimes.com.kp/?bbs=38323
A real gem. No wonder there is such a drive for “artificial” intelligence. “Intelligence” here not being the critical thinking abilities of a human being – but the bullshitting of the unintelligence agencies.
https://kcnawatch.org/newstream/
https://kcnawatch.org/
Ohhh… You beat me to it! It took me a while to find anything on covid, but I found a whole series of photos of ordinary people… and they’re all masked😲 Even North Korea as well!?
It’s fecken everywhere. Bloody hell.
Maybe there’s somewhere in deepest Patagonia they haven’t heard of it…
You need to watch the videos for some entertainment. I highly recommend the “Bag factory” and “Land of the People”.
“Land of the People” would have had Erich Honecker’s eyes in tears of joy.
And people are called “conspiracy nuts” when they realize how everything is just one huge fake centralized controlled reality.
Okay, I’ll check them out tomorrow Not. I was going to look at more videos on the scamdemic, but got distracted with other stuff…. tho I pretty much know everything about the greatest crime ever perpetrated on humanity.
Very late down here, so time to crash. Have a good weekend my friend…
I read months ago that a person not wearing mask was shot to death. Then I remembered that China had influence on NK and China was the starter of this covid operation.
It’s just a ‘reprint’. More waste of space.
What’s even worse is the waste of energy. One effing outlet would suffice to publish all this propaganda.
I’d like to add that PressTV keeps reporting about “food security” or the lack thereof. Are they not already the pariah of the world? Like North Korea? If so, why are they not promoting the massive permaculture of Hemp and Cannabis? Hemp seeds are one of the most valuable sources of plant protein and important fatty chains. But no – Iran goes the way of “industrial agriculture” reporting with pride about their mono cultures.
It really is just one gigantic bullshittery.
Delta Variant? What bollocks! India has a fatality rate lower than the UK’s! Using total numbers is more gaslighting (India, population 1.4 bilion).
This is what pisses me off. Iran is supposedly the pariah of the world – but is totally in line with all other bs msm oulets the world over? Disgusting this deception. Everything a pathetic ham theater.
The question of WHY virtually every country has ‘fallen into line’ behind the Empire is not easy to explain, if you ignore the power of the Empire to twist arms, isolate, punish, bribe and blackmail any country that doesn’t tow the line, even so-called developed countries like Sweden. Kinder words would explain it as ‘peer pressure’, but which ruling class of country A wants to be a pariah?
Then there’s the issue of the economic pressure exerted by virtue of the lockdown and shutdown of trade, after all global trade is controlled by the Empire. Countries like the UK can actually afford to shut down their economies (except for ‘essentials) and it’s been calculated that the British economy can sail on using only 20% of its workforce!
What’s NOT addressed by the corporate/state media is the devastating impact of this global shutdown on what we call the Global South and it’s not the Bug, it’s starvation and every other kind of disease that’s no longer being treated, where the REAL crimes of the Empire are revealed, India being a case in point. Shutdowns are only for the RICH NATIONS, the nations that can actually afford to indulge in such luxuries (WWII comes to mind).
My Mom keeps asking me how it all came to this. To which I have only one meaningful answer:
Consumerism.
Everything was more important than to prepare for times like this one. Soccer was always more important than growing food. Now it’s “No bread – just games”. Considering how dire the situation here in UY/LA is, when a soccer game is on, nothing else matters.
Soccer, football, rugby, tennis, basketball, NASCAR, boxing, Formula 1, moto GP – all games more important than paying attention to what is in the making politically. Since a very long time.
Combined with planned obsolescence consumerism – leaves no room time to focus on the true essentials. You could also call it “dumbed down to bricks”.
“So long as they (the Proles) continued to work and breed, their other activities were without importance. Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern…Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbors, films, football, beer and above all, gambling filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult.”
― George Orwell, 1984
Wow. To be honest, although I read “1984” a long time ago and was deeply moved by its dystopia, I have forgotten this exceptionally apt description by Orwell. Did he ever travel to South America? What insight into the deepest machinations of a people that completely lost the meaning of life. It is really depressing in an already depressing time.
For a long time, I have been wondering about what a writer like Orwell would write today about what is coming to humanity next.
I remember you called this manufactured wave months ago.
It seems Victoria has been selected as the state in Victoria to launch the new abnormal.
They could never persuade the people to take the jab if ‘covid’ never reappeared.
Apparently there was “vaccine hesitancy” here, and this latest conjuring trick in Victoria is undoubtedly to have way more people getting the jab.
Majority of my customers are your liberal The Guardian reading Labour voting self believing “progressives”… But only until push comes to shove. In name only. The number of them that fully support vaccine passports is just one example.
I’d say at a perceived guess, minimum 80% of my customers had either had the jab or were planning to get it. In fact, I’ve only had one single customer who knew its a scamdemic and total bollocks and who wasn’t getting vaccinated for that very reason, although she was a random customer and not a regular.
More cases here today from this “contagious” Delta variant of course.
Its like these demons pushing this crap were all deliberately put in place a few years (or less) prior to the plandemic. Oh my, is that a conspiracy theory? What am I thinking? Don’t see this current lockdown ending soon.
One of the more serious side-effects of the fake epidemic is the probable disappearance of the publicly funded National Health Services. By now we should know that the NHS was the finest achievement of the Labour Government in the UK in 1945. But it seems unlikely that the publicly funded health services (particularly in Europe) will survive in their present form. People with serious illnesses are now treated as nuisances and their numbers are piling up. But Covid ‘patients’ i.e., those healthy persons acting as human guinea pigs are given priority. Big Pharma, Big Government, Big Media are all behind this. The drive is to let the really sick people die so that resources can be transferred to the happy-jabby normies.
Such normal health services that do exist will be based upon the American model. No money – no treatment. I wonder if our jabby-fans realise this? But I suspect that our silly normies haven’t yet sussed this out? It seems doubtful. Moreover, the economic consequences of recurrent lockdowns and the resulting massive structural unemployment has begun to register of their collective consciences? Population adjustment downwards?
Yes, life is going to be really great after all the Anti-vaxxers are gone. No jobs, no (real)
food, no forever poisoning with the magic jab, no medical attention. No life worth living – the PTB will see to that.
Unfortunately , it seems that people who walk like sheep into the abattoir are frankly too stupid to survive. The PTB know this and so the programme rolls on.
I think you are right about the NHS which, as with so much else, is now the target of a manoeuvre which would have been unthinkable without the fake virus. With that, it joins the overall attack on the public purse. Recall that when the banks made off with vast oceans of cash in 2008, there was an immense upsurge of rage about it. And the PTB knew there was no way they could have gotten away with that a second time. And a few months back, the WEF said that the pandemic had already cost four times as much as that 2008 crash. But – lo and behold! Not a peep of protest over that! Well we were in the heart of this dreadful plague etc.
It’s deeply sobering to think of how the Left has for decades been rattling sabres out of defending the various these fundamental services to the death! We will never give up! And so on. But bring in the deadly plague and suddenly it all goes out the window.
And, as I’ve said so many times before, there was no other way you could have done this – no other way you could have had such a blatant attack on public services and not only get away with it but even have the “dissident” sector cheer you on and demand you go further!
Thus, the calls from the “Right-on Left”: “We must have more lockdowns! More facilities given over to the fight against covid! More people confined to their houses! Increased social distancing! Keep the people apart! Spend more and more money on vaccines and masks!”
Geo, shut up about the left, c’mon dude. Shaddup, you are pretty bang on with your patter but shaddup with all that left/right tosh. Puleease. otherwise, carry on bro ; )
Quite correct. Nobody cares!
I always thought I was a socialist, in the sense that society HAS to afford the weak, ill, young and aged etc some assurance of care; some social responsibility to care. now??
After WW2, socialism and communism provided the incentive (or challenge) that led to many social benefits across Europe and elsewhere. Now, GloboCap strikes back.
…and to further give credence to your accurate point, here is what zeke emmanuel, central figure on the affordable health care act of the u.s.,thinks about euthanasia and “efficient allocation of medical resources”. Keep in mind please, as you listen, that the intetview is from 2019 and he says that he considers a pandemic occurance a certain event of the future. I am clarifying that I am not, have been not, a fan of Trump or the republican party and neither of the democrats. Class war can not be resolved through parliamentary politics.
https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/talks-at-gs/dr-zeke-emanuel.html
And probably no cars either.
When you realise that our media system (in league with the customary consumer capitalist strategy of undermining individual self-worth to create “good consumers”) has always had the primary aim of constantly destabilizing (and thus neutering and coercing) the population, then you also realise that every thing you are told on the media should be taken not so much with a pinch of salt as with a vat of acid. David Icke tends to have a sledgehammer approach but nevertheless, he is essentially correct when he put it simply: “It’s all bollocks!”
I waded through part of the article but didn’t get anything useful out of it. Does Miss Frei believe convid is a real virus that emerged suddenly from bats or from a lab ? Does she believe it is deadly ? She says at one point she thinks the “vaccine” may be harmful. But doesn’t mention the huge death toll and the ocean of adverse events including serious ones.
Each new article from this author comes with ammunition against one or more opponents of the convid narrative. Is this appropriate at a time like this or a situation like this ? We are in the midst of a David vs Goliath propaganda struggle between the global media with it’s unlimited resources, the governments, big business and so much more on the one hand , and a handful of courageous individuals on the other. An unequal struggle like no other and the dissidents face history’s most aggressive censorship regime. To hand out equal amounts of ammunition to each side at this time is hardly fair. The establishment’s propaganda blitz is relentless and overpowering. What is most important is that it based on obvious falsehood. And this makes this situation sinister in the extreme. How can the speculation of a few individuals, the output of slingshots compare with the deafening artillery barrage mankind now faces ?
Even simple products encounter serious problems in the field. Most airliners have killed a lot of people before the problems were sorted out despite advanced analysis at the design stage. The injections are based on untested principles and have already shown themselves to be deadly even with massive under reporting. For God’s sake let people speculate on what might happen and how it might happen. The possibilities in the long term are horrifying. And the idea that the establishment would respect the most considered and qualified contrary opinions is absurd.
“nothing is true, everything is permitted”
I agree. I disagree with Frei’s admonishment at the end of her piece. We don’t need solidarity with the brainwashed coronazombies. We need solidarity amongst ourselves.
“The paper is about indirect and direct modes of transmission of Covid. But it does not mention vaccines, vaccination or injection of mRNA at all. Therefore it doesn’t back up the claim by America’s Frontline Doctors that people who receive Covid mRNA vaccines shed the spike protein”.
Granted that there is no formal research cited to support that claim. But can’t some assumptions be made by common sense, until the research is done? (Which, sadly, will probably never be done in this case, for obvious reasons).
If a person has Covid-19, we are told that he is likely to “shed” viral particles profusely, so that it is dangerous even to be in the same room. Can’t we reasonably assume that if a “vaccine” causes a person to create huge numbers of spike protein particles – which circulate throughout the bloostream – a fair number of those will be exhaled just as viral particles are?
Not just through breath but also through sweat vapour and glands. It really needs scientific proper study.
Only if you maintain a very strong awareness that you’re on the far left of Dunning Kruger.
What you’ve suggested is pure speculation, not “common sense”.
Can we reasonably speculate, hypothesize and discuss? Yes. Can we “reasonably assume”? Absolutely not.
Delta strain found in Australia. Sounds cool, like special ops or something.
Yes, Australia can get more corrupt. They don’t even attempt to hide it.
A badge of honer type decree, against logic.
The dilutes bang their noggins againts brick walls, hoping government will save them.
A badge of honor type crap.
I doubt the start point hasn’t even arrived.
Absolute whore mongering scum.
Every single last one of them!
Perhaps they’re big Lee Marvin fans?
Maybe, more John Wayne i reckon. At least Marvin was in a Sergio Leone flick.
And he sang the most philosophically astute line ever:
“I never seen a sight that didn’t look better looking back”
“If they hadn’t done what I told them not to do, they’d still be alive.” (Mr Blonde, dissecting moral dilemmas)
I’m waiting for the Bulgarian variant to arrive… or maybe the Maltese variant.
Buckle up Shin, this lockdown is going to go on for quite a while yet. The goal: to get the large majority vaccinated so then they can bring in vaccine passports.
They’ll pretend to um and ah about this, but believe me, they’re coming.
It’s straight out psychological warfare.
Been to 6 shops yesterday and today, and no one asked me to scan the QR code, and no one asked me to put a mask on.
Not a word in any of them. Am avoiding Coles and Woolies and going to smaller family owned businesses instead. Hope things are well with you…
It’ll probably be a combination Gezzah. Maybe a Fijian tropically strained Elixir mixed with the deadly Tasmanian chilled “cascade” variant.
The Maltese Mutant?
Yep, from Gozo apparently. Or maybe I’m mixing up Malta with Mali? It’s all a bit confusing at present🤷♂️
Warning: the Perth Amboy strain detected in northern New Jersey … seems to be a cross between the Flatbush variant and the Upper East Side sub-variant.
Pleased to report however that the Bronx has been exonerated and remains more or less within the traditional viral framework.
(Just read that the NYT considers satire “misinformation”. OGers please forgive me my satire. I will surely forgive you yours.)
That sounds so familiar. Where have I witnessed that before? Oh, yes, I remember now! When there were millions of voices (backed by studies about the adverse effects of micro wave radiation) demanding further research into “5G”, the Uruguayan people celebrated the swift installation of “5G” everywhere. “¡Ahora con 5G!” on the front doors of hotels and supermarkets. Demanding “vaccine passports”, driving in their cars double masked and faceshielded.
Must be the same DNA.
Yesterday I went to the butcher/corner store close by shortly before closing time and they were all watching “Uruguay vesus Paraguay” (soccer is the most important thing in life) with their masks all pulled down. At the door, I smile and say “Now we’re talking!” (because I call the face diaper “tapa loca” and speak up against it wherever possible) and they all put them back on synchroneously like swimmers doing their routine.
Thanks to Kevin who posted the link with Dr. Fuellmich having the international heads-up by laywers from South America, I was able to listen to the law professor from Uruguay, who just laughed at the question whether Uruguay is still a democracy. It never was. He called it a Cleptocorporacy. (at ~ 3:00:00).
We are in the last days of our civilization, says Irish writer John Waters, speaking on the Richie Allen show. We are steps away from yellow stars and the unvaxxed being lynched in the streets — for a pandemic that exists largely in the fascist media.
We have been broken like horses… millions have got use to the bridle. One trained to accept it, the horse can never be unbroken.
From 58 minutes.
Cheery news. Something to look forward to then.
Meanwhile, Banners galore seems to indicate that the ‘aliens’ story is ramping up, right on time.
Who could be dumb enough to believe such a story? It’s as dumb as thinking that being vaccinated forever with an untested synthetic gene therapy, for something less risky that the flu, is the route to a long and healthy life.
Why you’d have to be dimwitted enough to believe that the government loves you and cares so much that they would destroy the economy to save you, and exhort such words as ‘None of us is safe until we all are’.
Broken indeed
John does speak in the last six minutes of “men of few words” whom he knows are out there 😉
‘Who could be dumb enough to believe such a story?’
People who have been injected?
I don’t know. Aliens need a break and a laugh sometimes, too. So where would an advanced species on an advanced planet go?
ET: come on down!
There’s a big difference between horses and human beings Moneycircus. The analogy that’s being used doesn’t hold. Although it may be true that some people have been conditioned or trained to accept the current scam it certainly does not apply to everyone.
In fact more people far from being “broken” are beginning to see the light and are willing to do something about the scam given the opportunity.
Unfortunately, at the moment too few organized movements are available to join. However, joining the Common Law Court is a good start to become familiar with CL principles, jurisdiction, Court proceedings, dealing with the police and so on. Although a horse may “never be unbroken” there is no excuse for humans!
Yeah, that worked well in 1933 didn’t it. And that was a single country who couldn’t muster enough opposition to prevent a certain version of history being told.
For society at large, the outlook is bleak.
For outlaws, more of the same.
And as the saying goes Alan: “Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it”. We are now in 2021 not 1933 so let’s hope that people will muster up enough opposition to prevent that version of history being repeated! Or if not, its a question of “Your papers please”!
Outlaw as a description is meaningless in times of war.
Thanks for that link. Listened to it here on Saturday morning.
Has anybody read this piece on Lifsitenews?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vaccine-researcher-admits-big-mistake-says-spike-protein-is-dangerous-toxin
Allegedly, according to the author, the Spike Protein in these novel ‘vaccines’, is toxic!
The problem with ascertaining the veracity (or otherwise) is due to blanket censorship of alternate views. A search for Byram Bridle produced very little aside from republishing of the original article and Bridle’s own Website.
https://byrambridle.com/v1.html
But if true, it really is scary! I’m not a virologist, like most of us, I’m reliant on the science being verifiable, so what does one do? LIfesitenews has some dubious opinions eg, on ‘defending the family’ and anti-abortion propaganda, which leads me to suspect this story ain’t true.
Rosemary Frei agrees the jab is dangerous to the unjabbed. She just feels it is important to write a whole article dismissing any danger from the spike protein or mRNA as unscientific. According to her, the threat is still “something else”.
that website was put up under Dr. Brindles name within hours of his first public claim, it’s not his, it’s a hitpiece smear website,
looks like it was funded by the Canadian Gov since it redirects to scienceupfirst.
“JC on a bike” YouTube channel covers Dr Brindles claims on his latest stream.
Thanks for this! Much appreciated. I had a feeling that it was fake. As I said, the refs to it were self-referential! This is a perfect example of what censorship does to the truth. Had I been able to cross-reference, to other, independent sources i would have seen that it’s a fake.
The website you posted redirects to a ‘debunking’ site. Here is his university faculty page:
https://ovc.uoguelph.ca/pathobiology/people/faculty/Byram-W-Bridle
Bridle was interviewed on a podcast. It’s a very short interview:
https://omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-sugge
Something odd is going on. I get this “google feed” coming in automatically when I call up the net – and today there was, out of a total of perhaps 20 items, only one reference to the pandemic. The BBC supplies a little more but a lot of it seems to be embodying an expectation of “returning to normal”.
So, what does this signify? Has Event Covid achieved the desired effect? Or is this a phony lull before the next assault? Or is it a long-term combination of the two i.e. they have gone as far as they could at present, but they’ll be back and will engage in periodic scares until the generations eventually submit to a new regime?
A further possibility is that covid has now been established as “the norm” i.e. a basic and ever-present shadow that can be called up any time it is desired for instant behavioural modification or to provide an excuse for redistribution of materials and services.
Climate, “cyber attacks” on the food supply and conflict (target Russia) incoming.
It’s not odd. The social engineers know they can only push ONE message for so long before it becomes meaningless.
(A nice experiment you can do is to repeat a word, any word, to yourself and see how long it takes to become just a sound, or symbol if you are doing it silently- btw this is how mantras work)
So, waves are required. Fill people’s mind with something else for a while, then double down on the required message.
These people are nothing if not predictable.
Actually, they are NOTHING but predictable.
THEY are human filth.
This (habituation) seems to be a basic bearure of neurons. E.g., as we look intently at an object, the eye keeps making tiny shifts to move the focal point to a slightly different set of retinal receptors.
Pattern recognition
I reckon that’s a certainty, not a possibility.
That’s what THEY “think”.
Good questions! Nobody knows and the uncertainty of where this whole shitshow is going is also being used as a tool.Thats how the PsyOp works for them I guess.It drives me a bit mental sometimes. Am still trying to be cautiously optimistic but nothing would surprise me anymore.
Optimists are the most disappointed people.
Pessimists can sometimes be pleasantly surprised
There are some even more obvious questions you should ask yourself before being “wowed” by a study:
The reasons above are why you should be sceptical of studies done by pharmaceutical companies for example. Often they are the only ones with access to the data, they have invested sometimes billions in the development of new drugs and their work is often largely not reproducible. Is that “science”? Under a more scientific approach, an independent agency should obviously do all clinical trials on new medicines. I bet the efficacy and side effect profiles would be quite a bit different…. many medicines would not make it to the market.
I just wish somebody would take a sample of a ‘vaxx’ home and get a scientist friend to analyze it for fun.
Somebody out there has access to an electron microscope, and they could even let us see pictures of this unprecedented threat to the world – perhaps also some tattered remnants of viruses which lurked in boots from WW1 trenches…
“you should be sceptical of studies done by pharmaceutical companies”.
You don’t say. Their ONLY objective is to make money. Lots of it.
Twitter suspended the inventor of mRNA technology for saying that vaccinated persons could shed the spike protein… that’s a pretty big red flag in my opinion. It’s also not been reported on at all in MSM. Soon surely there will be multiple Fact checkers websites claiming he never said this.
This has never been about Covid. It’s about the vaccine.
What do you think is the goal of the vaccine?
First, oodles of moola for Big Pharma and then control, preparation for the coming conflagration.
passports, biotech & surveillance
I’ll quote from Independence Day “what do you want us to do?” Die
Depopulation.
It’s about control.
Automated humanity.
Human internet.
Electric identity.
If this trajectory continues, it won’t be long before only a tiny fraction are permitted to have children.
Via technology.
Conception, pregnancy and childbirth as we have known them will cease.
Well, frankly, I would want to spare children from an existence in this horrible mess.
I know it’s not my call, but the potential suffering ahead is unthinkable.
https://winteroak.org.uk/the-great-reset/
Lets assume for a moment that there actually is a covid19 virus (big assumption I know). PM of Australia today: “if you over 70 there is a 10% chance you will die if you contract Covid” Is this for real? WTF!! Am I living in a lunatic asylum? That’s a much better chance of survival than say contracting the flu and you over 70!! In fact given the low percentage one could safely add “over 70 and suffer from some other serious ailment”. In which case any of the usual viruses could be quite deadly. In fact covid sounds like the safer bet!! I mean seriously. We shut down the world for this bullshit!!! Even if it’s true it’s still bonkers. The Government is really terrified that some old people might die naturally from a virus. yeah right. Clearly not. ipso facto there is something else going on and it’s quite obvious. This is a global IQ test. If you fail (get vaccinated) you die. Some other tit bits of info from today’s press conference:
The covid vaccination program in Australia is headed by a military General, huh?
The vaccination council of Australia advises against mandatory vaccination.
btw mandatory? interesting. When did we ever give any government the right to inject any substance into our blood against our will? Let alone a friggin genetically modified virus of unknown origin manufactured by screw everyone for a buck Big Pharma without any testing!!! I’m so sick of this shit!!!
Portugals vaccination program also headed by high ranking military…..
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/portugal-vaccine-rollout-gets-new-chief-after-unsteady-start-portugal-european-union-work-ap-lisbon-b1797508.html
Presumably this is because the civilians previously in charge got a bit squeamish when they realised they were part of a plan to kill people.
So, employ someone who’s actual job is to kill people, instead, and the qualms disappear…..
Worryingly you are correct…bring in the psychopaths when the scientists balk at what they have done
As are many of the posh boarding schools, private colleges, business school… As was MTV in its heyday… The plot thickens, doesn’t it.
Exactly. Imagine if the illness were real: There would be a big shortage of the medication. A long waiting list for jabs and procedures. Governments would be playing DOWN the risks; or telling us to see a private doctor in Poland if we’re not happy.
In other words, the direct opposite of what has been happening.
I am over 70 and I would put my chances below 10% thank you dear prime minister…….
and if the govt really cared about old people they would actually be doing far more with services so many of them didn’t live in poverty, unable to afford better food and living conditions which would keep them alive far better than a bloody injection of a spike protein…
they cannot make it mandatory as it is against the Nuremberg trial laws…and in reality it is near impossible for many of us to actually make informed comment which is actually required under that code…thus injecting an old dementing person is illegal…some of them may be getting cold feet…the court cases must begin sooner or later…surely lawyers are not going to miss this bonza.
so yes total bullshit….
The lawyers will wait until it is safe to go after the bonanza, or in other words, when they are told to by the very same ‘authority’ who created the situation in the first place.
I believe a typical government response to a tsunami of legal cases is to ignore them all, using the excuse that it would cost the taxpayer too much money…
The criminals are all hiding behind each other because they are so many.
Agree.
And in the US Medicare goes after the assets of people who die in say nursing homes if they used Medicare…. (in 1993 Congress made it mandatory for states to try to recover money from the estates of people who used Medicaid for long-term care, which can cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars per person.)
Making the deaths of inconvenient old people a double win. No more government payouts in the form of Medicare or social security, plus the state—Michigan comes to mind—then by law has to/gets to go after whatever assets the deceased might have.
You are most certainly living in an asylum. Maybe try a One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest scenario.
if you over 70 there is a 10% chance you will die if you contract Covid vaccine
Well I’m over 70 and this text is not from beyond the grave.
We have given them this right for a long time. To jab us with fake and harmful concoctions, even as they deny us other treatment we seek. For unheard-of diseases. Not just adults but – especially – infants with undeveloped immunity. Despite ongoing injury. Across the planet. This is the insanity of globalism.
Strange messaging about the emergence of a so called “Nepal variant”
1) Initially reported on front page of a UK newspaper
2) WHO and Nepal deny knowledge of its existence
3) Grant Schapps uses it as an excuse to place Portugal on Amber travel list, ruining lots of peoples in progress holidays and planned holidays.
Is this evidence of them “making it up as they go along”
Or
Simply someone fucked up the narrative, timing wise?
Either way, clearly lies.
and vaccination rates go up. Get the picture.
Yes there was some shouty bloke on TV (Question Time) the other night who said the Alpha variant (or Delta,I can’t remember which) is 30% more transmissible even if you’ve been injected(!) so the vaccination rate must be increased. The mind boggles.
Also the change to travel status was announced on a Portuguese national holiday “corpus christi” 3/6/2021
Anyone else’s numerology/occult senses tingling?
I would say it’s paradoxical programming at its finest
Basically to keep the state of emergency they need to avoid big pharma legal liability
Fauci has a boss who’s rarely talked about: Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health. I’d hate for his preening minion to get all the credit.
Maybe Dr Collins is a nice guy. Does anyone have the nice on him?
Nothing at all fishy about him:
1) He’s a Fellow of the Royal Society (see Robert Lomas’ book for why that’s significant).
2) Educated at Yale.
3) Appointed to current post by Barrack Obama.
4) Belongs to a group called Biologos. If there’s any info on their funding I haven’t yet been able to find it. Their mission, to synthesise two apparent opposites (science and religion), is classic Freemasonry (it’s what the twin pillars symbolise with the invisible third pillar the synthesis).
5) He’s presented as a Christian but there are sound reasons to think this is a Masonic-Luciferian front. He was supposedly converted by reading C.S. Lewis – who just happened to die on the same day as JFK and Aldous Huxley. Collins’ Christianity is a very strange one which rejects both intelligent design and any changes to the abortion laws. He’s the sort of Christian Obama and Christopher Hitchens loved.
6) His background is mostly in the genome project. He said “It is humbling for me, and awe-inspiring to realize that we have caught the first glimpse of our own instruction book, previously known only to God.” Beneath the waffle about humility there’s a clear Luciferian message that man is becoming god here.
7) He worked overseas in missionary work, a classic intelligence front.
8) He plays in a rock band that parodies religious songs, an obvious mockery.
There’s this re Collins
https://thenationalpulse.com/news/faucis-boss-admits-funding-wuhan-lab-we-had-no-control-over-what-they-were-doing/
I am still skeptical of why this is all coming it now and why seeming defrocking of Fauci is now being pushed by MSM.
mRNA technology pioneer says Covid-19 vaccinated people can shed spike protein, Twitter says delete this
Luigi is reported to have said only in minute harmless amounts.
I’ve not yet seen anything well-sourced. It seems obvious that bodily fluids could transmit the vaccine since it enters the bloodstream–blood supply, mother’s milk. Has anyone commented on saliva? sex?
Yes, quite a few. You need to search with Yandex not Google or Duckduck. Bitchute is also a good source. Some very eminent Doctors have reported it.
I’m surprised this gets such a low star rating. IMV it is extremely beneficial advice for novices in the world of medical journalism such as myself. Thank you Rosemary, yet again. It also makes one aware of how totally inadequate, or non-existent, reporting by MSM is.
She has obviously stepped on some overly sensitive toes.
Scepticism is the very basis of scientific progress, and that is what Rosemary Frei is advocating, so she gets five stars from me!
Some people are very invested in this ‘shedding’ narrative which would be my surmise as to the source of the downvoting.Why they are so invested is something else….
If it means anything, it’s a badge of honour. Articles that everyone likes are usually just singing to the choir.
Spike protein shedding has enough evidence in favor of it (Pfizer trial protocols, statements from mRNA tech inventor Luigi Warren) that it seems like it should be regarded as at least possible, rather than “disproven” as msm would have us believe.
If it in fact turns out to be true, the implications are obviously terrifying.
Therefore, caution and awareness of this possibility is well-advised, imo.
I like articles like this. It’s what school/ university doesn’t teach you: how to study.
It’s what the media moans about but does nothing to change: how to evaluate the worth of information; is it simply noise or does it add to knowledge?
Why are misleading articles allowed to fester? Because they profit a vested interest.
The scandal of the Lancet’s short-lived demolition job on HCQ, when the most prestigious medical journal was forced to do someone’s dirty work, on order to suppress at-home treatments and force people onto ventilators to ramp up the death numbers….
No that was not bad research. That was an intel op.
It reminds me, at several removes, of Mae Brussell’s timeless, “How Do You Tell a CIA Espionage Plot from a Revolutionary, Radical, Terrorist Guerrilla Army?”
No the demo job on HCQ was to get the emergency act in…..they couldn’t get that in with any potential drug assistance in existence….so hatchet job on HCQ and ivermectin…yes it helped with death numbers but they were just collateral damage in the real cause of getting the magic injections into action….the need for emergency continues to this day as obviously they have not made enough profit or have this raging need to get that spike protein into as many bodies as possible for some reason we are yet to learn about….
anyone care to enlighten me on that one?
Good points. I listened again to Dr Peter McCullough’s interview yesterday and made notes, especially the second part.
TL;DR if it was just about a population database there would be several ways including a jab that’s tried, tested and harmless. Instead it is setting up the population for a super bug, especially given the stated aim of injecting everyone with a narrow-spectrum treatment.
The medical treatment is customised for every individual. There is no such thing as the “vaccine “.
The treatment may accelerate death (according to the wishes of the individual), it could cause a cripplingly expensive life long medical dependency, or indeed provide a back door directly into the human genetic operating system allowing for remote manipulation.
Basically the system is designed to act as an energy vampire, harvesting and monetising human social energy.
The individuals making these grave errors of misjudgment will, after leaving this plane, be fully aware of their mistakes and will be more cautious and critical in the future.
A world has been prepared for them in order to continue their incarnations and their spiritual growth.
People have given their consent to being injected with “x”.
They have relinquished autonomy of their bodies.
They are now property of corporations and will serve these masters until their physical demise.
Sadly as if we were not before this, when one thinks of reality of life…but the illusion of choice has now gone…and as I know people playing with aps that claim to know what the body and mind is doing from moment to moment, you may well be right that this hooks into that kind of sy
Hello, very interesting and a bit ……..amazing.
What about magnetic jabs?
There are a lot of videos. Are they truly facts?
Roberto, about magnetic jabs– a few people claim that a magnet against the skin of the injected arm causes the injected person to feel something “pulling.” If this is real, it could mean injection of a ferritin protein. I have no data to suggest it is real.
What have YOU heard about magnetic jabs?
I saw a video on Del Bigtree’s site where they tried a magnet on ~15 random vaccinated people on the street. The magnet stuck to about a third of them.
What does this mean? I don’t know. Seems obvious that a microchip small enough to be injected would probably not be enough to get a magnet to stick. But who knows? Seems to warrant an investigation at least
Did they try the magnet on the other arm, too? And is it still there when they are grounded by touching the plumbing?
They tried the other arm, didn’t stick. They didnt test your second question
A third? More like half.
Could be right. i’d have to watch it again
‘They’ want to genetically/protein engineer desirable qualities into humans.
Billions have been invested and every major economy in the world have written white papers regarding the markets they intend to create.
But the technology they hope to use is inexact and their understanding of what they’re doing is limited.
They cannot predict the outcome of changing proteins.
So with smaller organisms they create as large and diverse a pool of mutations as possible and screen them for desirable qualities.
I’d speculate that’s what the intended regime of continual testing and jabbing is for.
First create a full catalogue of all human DNA and then monitor the changes as the shots start to alter it.
Perhaps this has already started or perhaps they are simply in the process of normalising the regime and testing the mediums.
If the mediums cause too many or too diverse reactions it will make it very difficult to get meaningful results from the experiments. They will need to catalogue those reactions first.
Obviously mutating the human population in in such a haphazard fashion will cause large numbers of cancers, neurological disorders, endocrine problems and who knows what other issues.
I don’t think it was coincidence that one of the first criticisms of lockdown allowed in MSM was the catastrophic impact on cancer services.
So everybody knows there’s going to be lots of cancer.
I don’t think it’s as straightforward as ‘they’re going kill/sterilise us’.
Obviously once the system is fully in place they can do whatever they decide and perhaps they haven’t decided yet.
But with the experiments and the disruptions to economy/society, the forced ‘euthanasia’ protocols, not to forget the extraordinary stress people are subject to, I think society is going to experience a kind of crude winnowing.
Not like being herded into death camps, more like being harried out of existence by pirates or raiders.
“I don’t think it’s as straightforward as ‘they’re going kill/sterilise us’.” That statement rather depends on whether you know why they doing it and understand the complete picture. To me everything looks like depopulation and the vaccine is the real virus. It’s actually very simple to understand. Too many people, too little time and dwindling resources. To me it is very straightforward and they have done nothing to suggest otherwise.
It is interesting that the US food etc mob are now apparently suggesting it is useless to test for antibodies to the injection….I am having trouble following that which is supposed to be their advice…..anyone else seen this?
There is no such thing as testing antibodies for a virus. So, they can say whatever they want. They treating us all like dummies because 80% of us are.
That is why I deliberately used to the injection.
We are meant to believe there are too many people, too little time and dwindling resources, but none of these are necessarily true at all; it’s more a matter of ‘them’ wanting to control all resources as well as all people.