WATCH: 9/11 Truth – Lessons Learned?

Since the beginning of covid the most remarkable thing for me is the inexorable spread of total boredom throughout the media – even to the “extreme reaches”.

Somewhere in GG Preparata, he notes the insidious vapidity of academic discourse, the grinding soullessness of it all – like a more severe version of the deadening joylessness of school curriculums through which every poor bastard passes – expectant children go in one end and completely desiccated husks emerge at the other. And these are the products our zombie workhouse requires for the delectation of the vampiric appetites at the top.

All of which was vaguely mitigated by what appeared to be a genuine opposition pre-covid but post-covid proves to be a total con. Now even the last vestiges of life have disappeared – at least from the mainstream, which has now proved to be far more all-embracing than previously thought. There is a desert out there now, an endless tundra in which the only sound seems a repetition of Pink Floyd’s “Is there anybody out there?” Thankfully there’s something “in here”. For which I once again thank OffG.

And I reckon I’m long overdue a revisit to past literature which I previously dismissed. Perhaps a visit to Antony Sutton and Carrol Quigley may provide some insights? Perhaps even one Jasun Horsley? He has written two books:

“Prisoner of Infinity: UFOs, Social Engineering, and the Psychology of Fragmentation” 

and

“The Vice of Kings: How Socialism, Occultism, and the Sexual Revolution Engineered a Culture of Abuse” 

I would once have given a wide berth to anything rubbishing “socialism” but, after the dismal showing of “the Left” over covid and their now unmistakable psychological conditioning with its partisan knee jerk reactions, I am prepared for some wider viewpoints.

Even before 9/11 happened there were Americans willing to believe that their governments were capable of such an atrocity. And I’m quite sure that some people had made up their minds while the towers were still standing and burning. 

That there are so many willing to believe 9/11 “truth” is in my opinion an indictment of American journalism and the American state. There is widespread corruption and dishonesty.

But even they are not capable of perpetrating an atrocity of the magnitude of 9/11 on their own soil.

The more dogmatic a narrative the more cult-like it’s followers appear. 9/11 truth is highly dogmatic. To an outsider it has an almost religious quality to it. The movement has converts to the cause. They are interviewed and speak openly about their journey and their conversion.

Those already on board speak warmly of the converts and are openly hostile to unbelievers, accusing them of blasphemy for taking issue with “the truth”.

Now, I know I say that narratives do not contain truth. I should clarify. I’m not saying that narratives are outright lies necessarily – though they may be. What I’m saying is that narratives can at best only describe events, they are not the events themselves.

That’s a subtle and important distinction.

Sometimes even a truthful commentator can get things wrong on occasion. An sometimes eyewitnesses will form a different impression of what happened in a particular event. And yes, there are often unanswered questions.

But this is why the strict adherence to a narrative is always a mistake. If you need to defend your narrative so fiercely then maybe there is something wrong with your narrative? Or is everyone that disagrees with you a Russian bot?

There is an alternative explanation for the collapse of WTC7, but you won’t entertain it because it doesn’t confirm your narrative.

I think that the fact that there are so many willing to believe 9/11 “truth” is an indictment of American journalism and the American state. There is too much dishonesty and cynical manipulation of ordinary Americans in the media and politics.

The media cried wolf in 2001 and many Americans did not believe them. In my opinion that is a very sad reflection on the state of the world and the United States in particular in the 21st century.

Perhaps the dissident sites (the genuine sincere ones, not the mole infested ones) are silent here because they simply do not have the skill set and conceptual tools to understand what they are dealing with. They have been drilled in the Western liberal paradigm that cannot envisage such a matter as concentrated secret communication between clandestine groups i.e. conspiracies.

Furthermore, their entire self-image is based on an aggressively assertive rejection of such conspiratorial suspicion, this latter being relegated to an imagined infantile and (here it comes) “fascistic” mentality. The “proper lines” of enquiry have been firmly established. They have reigned for decades now and the psychic formation has now ossified.

Zubin Damania’s rudimentary “checklist” gives the conspiracy phobic catechism with a crude faddishness. And such is the current confused state of the Left that I have no idea whether they would feel embarrassed to be associated with him or consider him a real funky dude!

But the underlying buzz over the whole covid psy-op has simply been an update of the old war propaganda with a new twist. The Krauts/ Commies/ Ragheads have been uploaded to a viral menace. But the accoutrements of this age old scam remain the same: the deadly dull ban on all forms of levity, the insistence on waves of communal grief or ecstatic affirmation to be on hand for instant production, the po-faced presentation of even the most laughable clichés.

And this is where David Icke’s metaphor of reptilian entities is indeed pertinent. The reptile – the unsmiling scaly inscrutable automaton, the mindless scramble around a hierarchy, the absolute negation of all distinction, inspiration, and spirit. This is the utterly dead world that the overlords have always worshipped and considered an utter necessity for the masses that they despise.

Health is always signified by irreverence, by the joyful acknowledgement of absurdity, by the raucous laugh at pomposity tripping up over itself. This the overlords have always despised. And they have not been slow to condemn it. And traditionally it was the Left who were the biggest scoffers, the most gleeful mockers.

But the unprecedented move whereby the controlled opposition now take centre stage has produced a most peculiar situation. The moles guided the duped dissidents into the center – where they blink in confusion. Weren’t they supposed to be the outsiders? Weren’t they supposed to “deconstruct” the press? What happens when the press agree with them? This presents no problem to the moles of course who can gladly churn out contradictions, the biggest being their insistence that the media want to cover up covid or downplay it (?!) But the dupes are the ones who notice things (eventually).

And so what do they do when presented with a hugely advertised “Great Plague Which Will Destroy Capitalism”? How do they account for the curious congruence between their revolutionary ambition and the high profile devastation being eagerly promoted by the media – which is after all a capitalist media?

An unease permeates their souls. Something is amiss here. By their logic, the proles should be lining up for the vax and demanding its application everywhere. So why the increasingly illiberal drive towards coercion from the rulers? Are all vax refusers dupes of the “Right Wing”? If so, why is the media promoting that very notion?

The crash you now hear is the massed floundering of the embarrassed duped dissidents.

This is the sort of video that worries me about Corbett. He claims a) the 9/11 movement failed b) this was because of internal divisions.

The claim the 9/11 movement failed seems more and more like subtle black-pilling to me. It didn’t fail – in fact its success is being shown in the US vaccination rates. Large numbers have been woken up to how large psy-ops are conducted and can now recognise one in real time. That’s a massive transformation achieved against all the wealth and resources of the oligarchs and deep state. Corbett seems to be saying the movement has failed until the perpetrators are in jail. That’s never going to happen – he’s setting up an impossible standard. It’s also not something his rival systems are going to achieve – so presumably they are failures too?

The claim about the danger of internal divisions is a go-to for stifling debate and blocking lines of research (gate-keeping, to be blunt). Was some of the debate about, for example, how exactly were the Towers brought down frustrating? Sure. Was some of that contrived? Almost certainly. So? Does that mean self-appointed leaders can enforce party discipline and order people not to look at the evidence for a directed energy weapon because “laser beams in space” rhetoric can be used to try to make ‘truthers’ sound crazy? It’s nothing more than the old siren call of “respectability” – and look where that got oppositional movements. The crucial part about “you’re crazy” is not to be triggered by it and to keep calmly and patiently explaining one’s evidence for believing something. (I’m not claiming that’s easy or that I’ve always lived up to it BTW).

The part of the video I particularly find concerning is where Corbett implies an equivalence between “no planes on 9/11” and “no viruses”. They are not equivalent at all – the former dismisses something thousands of people saw with their own eyes; the latter questions something that only Rockefeller-trained operatives can see in an expensive piece of tech. What they say they are seeing has plausible alternative interpretations whereas a plane hitting a building is a plane hitting a building. I hate feeling like I ought to write this because it makes me sound like a “no viruses” fanatic. I’m not – I’ve seen plausible evidence to suggest it may be a valid hypothesis, nothing more. The holes in germ theory are quite amazing when one looks – and nobody should say or imply “don’t look”. The answer to “no viruses” is to make a compelling case that viruses do indeed exist, something Corbett hasn’t done. There’s the greatest opportunity ever here to re-conceptualise our whole paradigm of health which is not an opportunity to be passed up lightly. Corbett’s approach would dismiss Covid-19 but leave open the door for every other virus and they have and will concoct.