REVIEW: The Zone of Interest by Martin Amis
VN alexander
In Martin Amis’ The Zone of Interest (2014), set in a Nazi death camp, the Commander, Paul Doll, has his wife, Hannah, and two daughters living with him in the “zone,” where the smell of rotting flesh from the mass graves functions as a persistent clue that things have gone very, very wrong in the world.
How did the German civilians go about their lives and continue to be human beings in such an atmosphere? That’s the question that must have compelled Amis to write this novel. While no sane person can fully imagine the answer to that question, Amis creates a few plausible stories that people might have told themselves.
In alternating chapters, three first-person narrators give their perspectives. Romantic playboy Angelus Thomsen (aka Golo) opens with a Werther-reminiscent description of Hannah Doll as a German giantess Hera incarnate. A romance in a death camp? Impossible. I almost put the book down; in fact, I did for years, but then last month I picked it back up.
When Thomsen pays a first visit to her house, he notes that Hannah:
leaned over and over rummaged in a flowerpot on a low shelf … to tell the truth, in my amatory transactions I hadn’t had a decent thought in my head for seven or eight years (earlier, I was something of a romantic. But I let that go). And as I watched Hannah curve her body forward, with her tensed rump and one mighty leg thrown up and out behind her for balance, I said to myself: this would be a big fuck. A big fuck: that was what I said to myself.
This is how the story begins, but after the first chapter it became clear that Amis wasn’t going to attempt to write about sex or a romance, and I kept going. We find that Thomsen is not a typical Nazi; he is a tweed-wearing civilian liaison between the military and manufacturers, and we learn that he is the privileged nephew of Hitter’s top advisor. That, in combination with ideal German good looks, gives Thomsen the latitude to be optimistic about cuckholding the genocidal fool running the camp.
Amis certainly sets a challenge for himself to write about love between “good” Germans in the midst of frenzied slaughter, worsening with every loss in the field, as they spiral out of the moral universe at light speed.
Following a parabolic character arch, Thomsen is soon is too concerned about Hannah to dare think of putting her at risk. His romantic impulse returns (and layers itself upon the lust, which does not diminish). Thomsen’s turning point comes when he happens to be out for a walk and finds Hannah napping in a gazebo. After watching her sleep for some time, he admits, “I felt something happen to the sources of my being. Everything I had waived and ceded made itself known to me. And I saw, with self-detestation, how soiled and shrunken I had let my heart become.”
Although Thomsen has “let go” many of the atrocities he has witnessed, he begins to resist his active part in helping the machine run. He is in charge of getting a city-sized factory, for making ethanol and rubber, up and running. When completed, the factory would give Germany self-sufficiency. Though this might not bring victory for the Germans, Thomsen understood it would drag the war out much longer, so he sees to it that one of the British prisoners adds sand to the machinery, a crime for which Thomsen is eventually imprisoned as the war grinds to a halt.
The second narrator is Commander Paul Doll, the Old Boozer, grotesque, thrice “bemedalled (Iron Cross, Silver Wand Badge, SS Honor Ring),” who stood “with his legs absurdly apart, rocking on his heels.” The Commander is dealing with the inconvenient problem that the mass graves his camp has supplied with 100,000+ bodies (before they got the crematory going) are leaching into the aquifers and poisoning the local water supply. He is charged with the task of digging the nearly liquefied remains up and then burning them. It is an engineering problem on a massive scale. But it is his smarter sidekick Szmul, a Jewish inmate, who helps contrive a scooping machine as well as a device to catch the melting fat so that it could be reused as fuel.
Throughout the story Commander Doll is almost always drunk and his main function is to inform newly arrived evacuees that they will be cared for and housed and that they should all undress and go into a shower room for a good delousing. He is aware no one believes him, but he plays his ridiculous part because undressing dead bodies would be difficult and time-consuming.
Amis works hard to imagine what sort of struggles such a man as Paul Doll might have, and he tries to locate his vulnerabilities, because even the most evil people have them; they may have more than most, in fact. In a masterfully dark comic scene, Amis reveals that Doll is intimidated by a trainload of well-educated wealthy French Jews who, he imagines, look down on the Germans for the uncouth way in which they are proceeding with their final solution. As the newly arrived prisoners stand on the platform, a truck carrying bodies appears at exactly the wrong time:
Here it came, that wretched, that accursed lorry, the size of a furniture van yet decidedly uncouth—positively thuggish—in aspect, its springs creaking and its exhaust pipe rowdily backfiring, barnacled in rust, the green tarpaulin palpitating, the profiled driver with the stub of a cigarette in his mouth and his tattooed arm dangling from the window of his cab. Violently it braked and skidded, jolting to a halt as it crossed the rails, its wheels whining for purchase. Now it slumped sickeningly to the left, the near sideflap bellowed skyward, and there—for 2 or 3 stark seconds—its cargo stood revealed.
It bothers Doll that the Jews judge him as barbaric, unable to commit genocide in a manner befitting the Aryan nation. We understand that embarrassment fuels much of Doll’s hatred and vengeance.
The third narrator is Szmul, a Jewish prisoner who keeps a diary, which he will bury in a hedgerow near the Commander’s house for historians to find. Szmul and a dozen other men like himself are in charge of ushering the evacuees into the gas chamber, then later dragging the bodies out, searching their orifices for valuables, removing gold teeth and cutting their hair (to be sold for wigs). Every little bit to finance the war effort. The men who perform these services for their captors are called Sonders (special) and are rewarded with extra rations.
Szmul notes, “A hero, of course, would escape and tell the world. But it is my feeling that the world has known for quite some time. How could it not, given the scale?”
Every morning at dawn these witnesses talk with each other, eyes averted. Sometimes they consider warning the evacuees of what’s coming, to create panic on the platform and make the whole process more difficult for the Commander. But in the end, they continue to keep everyone calm so that the terror only last for fifteen minutes once they are crowded into the gas chamber. This is how the Sonders justify not committing suicide. When the new arrivals detrain, the Sonders go through the crowd and whisper to young men telling them to say they have a trade so that they won’t be killed immediately. In this way, they are able to save (or prolong), on average, one life per transport.
The novel is increasingly concerned with the fact that the Germans are losing to the Russians. The term Schadenfreude was never so apt; it describes this reader’s feeling so well. It was satisfying to read about the how the Nazis were realizing that their plans were falling apart under their own horrid weight. As Szmul observes,
A bewildered lull settles on the Lager after the German defeat in the east. It is like an attack—and I admit to bathos—of mortal embarrassment. They see the size of their gamble on victory; the fantastic crimes legalised by the state, they finally understand, are still illegal elsewhere.
Although the first-person is the best narrative device for putting the reader in the character’s head, which is what Amis seeks to do, the three narrators all sound a bit too like Amis, fond of the sonic quality of language, witty, capable of very compact descriptions, and British (Thomsen quotes Auden). Perhaps limited ironic third-person would have been a better choice for Paul Doll, and perhaps for Angelus Thomsen too, to parody their internal dialog and to betray the person’s often self-deluded perspective. But I never suspended my disbelief and was always aware of what Amis was doing with his puppets. He doesn’t portray the thoughts of someone like Doll realistically, but tainted with his judgment. Szmul muses that “Somebody will one day come to the ghetto or the Lager and account for the near-farcical assiduity of the German hatred.”
This is, I think, what Amis does very well.
Amis is one of my favorite writers, and I must confess an envious thought or two went through my head as I was reading, Oh sure, that’s a powerful image, both horrible and comical at the same time, but what writer couldn’t write profoundly about such a subject? It’s the proverbial side of the barn. And I also wondered why he doesn’t apply his talent to more contemporary holocausts. Seems there’s plenty to choose from, some ongoing.
But Amis has been obsessed with WWII death camps for decades. After Times Arrow (1991), in which Amis made sense of the Holocaust by narrating it in reverse, he wrote the non-fiction book Koba the Dread (2002) which explores that machinations of Stalin’s holocaust. Next Amis gave us The House of Meetings (2007) which further explores Stalin’s atrocities in fictional form. Amis has given us valuable insight that we might use some day. The cattle cars stand in wait for the next time. We humans really do need to learn from history.
I finally chose to return to this novel now, at this time, because lately people have been saying that they are beginning to understand how the Germans could let genocide happen. I can’t help but recognize that, here I am, in November 2021, a good citizen, and this week a 13-year-old girl in my neighborhood, who got the shot, has been in the ICU in a coma, unable to breathe on her own, suffering constant seizures from an autoimmune response, as her own body attacks her nerves and her brain. What did I do to warn her mother? What did I do to try to shut down the pop-up shot clinic at her school? Not enough.
You get used to smells, even bad ones. You don’t notice them anymore; you cannot smell your own scent, except when it changes. When the train arrived at the death camp, there was always the characteristic odour to greet the new prisoners. Doll noticed, “some of our newcomers were sniffing it with upward jerks of their heads.” But they tell themselves it can’t possibly be what it seems to be, and even after they see the rotting corpses in the truck, Amis tells us, they “were utterly incapable of absorbing what they had just seen.”
Genocide is unbelievable, no matter how many time history tries to convince us that it does sometimes happen.
V.N. Alexander, V. N. Alexander (vnalexander.com), Ph.D., is a philosopher of science and novelist, who has just completed a new satirical novel, C0VlD-1984, The Musical.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
“Koba the Dread (2002) which explores that machinations of Stalin’s holocaust”
What Stalin Holocaust is this like? Fun fact 99% of all anti Stalin folk are peddling bollocks.
Genocide through gas chambers is a nonsense upon the face of it.
No self respecting German engineer would come up with such a ludicrous method as what’s touted.
Cattle cars and concentration camps for sure. Ugly enough without mass gassing….
Rotting Flesh ?
But a chap on another thread claimed there were enough ovens to do the job. So which version is true ?
I hope it won’t appear I’m trivializing this issue if I compare holocaust denial to virus denial. Both seem very cut and dried: it either existed or it didn’t. But the devil, as they say, is in the details.
Just as the No-Virus proponents have a lot to account for besides the virus itself, so too do the No-Holocaust proponents have a lot to account for.
What of all the gathering of peoples to be sent to the concentration camps? From places like Poland, Croatia, Ukraine? Was that a ruse? if not, where did they go? what happened to them? Clearly they did not all secretly go to the Middle East or else someone in the Middle East would have noticed – and complained. And back then the MSM did not have the stranglehold on public information that they do today; so something would have been reported somewhere.
Comparing the holocaust with, say, the 911 attack: it would indeed be a piece of cake to either invent outright or dispose of a few thousand people. But millions? No, there’s no way such a figure could represent a ruse.
Something happened to millions of people. They must be accounted for if they did not perish in the holocaust. If they were never sent to camps, where did they go? People don’t just vanish.
Yes, I agree to a point – simply too many accounts of deaths and images which are perfectly credible … and while there are numerous stories of miraculous savings of life, the stories have credibility while the 9/11 miracle survival stories have zero credibility.
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/sept11/2003/n_9189/
In the case of the no-virus proponents, they say no virus has been proven to exist according to the scientific method and I think that is a fair claim. Mark Bailey, Mike Stone and others have looked at numerous scientific papers purporting the proof of one virus or another and they explain how the experimental process in every single case is unscientific. However, there is a vacuum one would like to fill in terms of what does cause a lot of the illness said to be caused by viruses. But then look at it this way – there are an awful lot of conditions we tend to think aren’t caused by viruses and we’re OK with that, cancer and loads of other organ conditions, for example.
OffG seems to be pushing this H narrative a lot a the moment.
why…?
Sorry to hear of the death of Martin Amis at a relatively young age.
Oddly, Martin Amis died on the same day that “The Zone of Interest” film premiered (19th May, 2023). And also at the same age as his father Kingsley, 73.
Though, he’d probably argue that 73 isn’t that young. Dickens, Shakespeare etc dying in their 50s
Constantly reliving the horrors of the Nazis of almost a century ago, does help us ignore the Nazis in Ukraine and in NATO today, to turn a blind eye to the followers of Stepan Barndera in the US, Canada, and the family history of people like Chrysta Freeland. We can focus on the slaughter of the Jews and forget that 3 million Russian POWs died, including Stalin’s son. We can take as normal the overt fascism of our current corporate/government marriage and ignore the oligarchy we live under today which treats us all as slaves. Let us never forget, or we may start to see.
The Evil Germans, eh. At this point in time, how were the Jews seen in other parts of Europe?
So he could wax lyrical about Nazi Germany but essentially he was clueless:
From interview:
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2020-10-09/martin-amis-on-cancel-culture-mourning-and-what-hitchens-might-have-made-of-2020
Q: You state in “Inside Story” that the 9/11 attacks made writing feel irrelevant at the time. Fiction was “partly a form of play,” you write, while reality was now “earnest.” How does it feel 19 years later to be publishing a novel in the midst of a pandemic?
A: The terrorist attacks were much more shocking to me than has been the coronavirus, which crept up on us. It was a thunderclap at the time, and I felt sort of canceled out by Sept. 11. But when I spoke to Zadie Smith about this at the time, she said: “Yes, but your fighting spirit gets going,” and it does, and it did.
Disappointing, yes. The big novelists have to wait a generation or two before they touch a controversial topic. Dickens, for instance. It’s easier to satirize dead targets. By the way, I wrote a 9/11 novel Locus Amoenus.
Hmmm, so at least one part of the story based on reality is death … but the propaganda strategy for 9/11 was the fake binary (see Catte’s article, https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/16/the-function-of-the-fake-binary/).
We were given two choices:
A. Terrorists did it
B. US government did it
when the reality was C:
the US government (with a great deal of collaboration and complicity) was responsible but they staged the death and injury – which isn’t to say that no one died or was injured.
The fake binary propaganda strategy is used in most big psyops and it’s important to recognise it.
Both the believers and disbelievers of the official story must accept miracles and other nonsense … unless they dig a little deeper.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/both-believers-and-disbelievers-of
I agree with you 100%.
The wife of an Auschwitz death camp commandant would likely qualify as one of the weirdest muses in literary history. Though the film version was apparently well received at the 2023 Cannes festival:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Zone_of_Interest_(film)
Aside from the character’s private lives, the novel was apparently fairly accurate historically
Let’s face it – the politicians dont trust us…
It doesnt matter how Good a boy you try to be, you are never Good Enough…
The bastards just dont trust us, that’s a dead cert !!
I posted one of the first comments and now it’s not there. It has been suppressed by OffG?
It happens.
It’s very disappointing. It seems OffG is just as sensitive to the holohoax and does not want any truth posted in case it upsets the jewish lobby. All other lies and scams can be tackled but not the holohoax, which is a undeserved blight on the people of Germany.
*sigh* No you didn’t.
Talk about the “holohoax” to your heart’s content. You’re clearly very proud of the wordplay.
X
Yes i did, ‘sigh’. It seems talking honestly about one of the most successful scams to date isn’t allowed on OffG. If that’s the case then just say so.
The holocaust and no virus.
The both are a no go zone it seems…
> I posted one of the first comments and now it’s not there. It has been suppressed by OffG?
Maybe you posted the comment on a different site?
Thanks for the suggestion. I definitely posted. Maybe the truth is too much for some?
Yes, we’re terrified of your truth, which is why you’re completely free to post the fact right here.
Sometimes comments go astray, try to get used to the fact.
I think we can safely say that Hitler blamed the Jews for the economic malaise that beset the world and that he wanted their businesses shut down and have them deported. He had made deals with leading Zionists to that effect. Other countries took them in, if they brought trunks full of money, such as Switzerland, and people smugglers made money off those unfortunate Jewish people fleeing on boats to American (only to be offloaded on off-shore sandbanks and to be drowned at sea when the tide returned). So, there were guilty and psychopathic people involved across the world.
However, I’m having doubts as to the systematic incineration of Jews (and Communists, Gays, regime critics, etc.) after some reading of revisionist literature, including texts written by Jewish people.
Here’s one site that claims to be impartial and open to information contrary to what they have in their archive for a more balance retrospective of what may or may not have happened during this horrid time:
Whatreallyhappened.info is based in the United Kingdom and devoted to free inquiry into historical events.
Disclaimer: We link to a wide variety of sites, videos, etc. You may, will, disagree strongly with some of them, since they represent differing viewpoints; you may even find some offensive. Our linking to them in no way implies our support for any views expressed in them. It implies only that we think that viewing them may help us or you to a better understanding of the issues, even where we reject what is said.
This site exists to promote an open scientific, evidenced-based approach to historical enquiry. We do not believe or reject anything, though naturally we do form opinions. However, they are just that: opinions based on our current understanding of the facts. We are not emotionally attached to them and we would have no problem with changing our current positions on any subject if the evidence suggested we should.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/index.html
As for the possibility or impossibility of a relationship/romance.. in a death camp: Please read Rudolf Vrba’s book “I Escaped from Auschwitz” and you will see that impossible things can be quite possible. Greetings.
How dare you! You are trivializing the suffering of millions with that utterly uncomprehending foulness! Don’t you know history began in the 1930s and ended in 1945? Don’t you know that geography consists entirely of Germany? Don’t you know that there was only one Holocaust and any reference to it must be vetted by The Experts Who Know The Truth? Don’t you know that we must never forget something that we must never ask about and have any understanding of?
Sweet..
Above all, never compare any tragedy to the Supreme Tragedy.
Do you mean the Armenian genocide or the Holodomor?
What holodomor? The soviets sent grain and all sorts to Ukraine.
People who are exposed to torture deny mentally what happens doesnt happen and didnt happen.
They block. Children do the same when they cant handle what happen just now, for example a stupid adult..
Maybe its the same mechanism during this nottobenamed scam period.
I’ll read it if it has leather lampshades and soap (both made-up by the authors of that grim tale of victimhood). Yawwwn… the Germans were such sadists really, weren’t they???
Genocide is unbelievable, no matter how many time history tries to convince us that it does sometimes happen.
Indeed, indeed.
Most Germans did not vote for Hitler ( who was actually voted into power many years before the war using the same shambolic “democratic” system we have today) and there were no ally reports of a H0l0caust when they entered Germany in 1944.
It’s safe to assume most Germans did not become aware of any genocide (probably because there wasn’t any) other than the global war that went on for 4 years. If they lived/died in Dresden they may have seen what genocide looks like, administered by allied planes.
The camps were secret and not an advertised feature of Hitler’s policies. No doubt many Germans would have loathed the dictatorship even with no word of genocide.
“Wenn das der Führer wüsste“. The Germans believed in their Leader.
In fact it looks like the camps were hastily set up with shoddy infrastructure after the Nazis failed to reach an agreement with the Zionist organisation (who wanted a tragedy) about deportation so they came up with a plan B which was work to death in a forced labor camp.
The idea the Nazis would waste enormous amounts of fuel to incinerate 6 million (or was it 5 million) bodies in those camps, in the middle of an insane war effort against the USSR (their main threat) and the rest of the “Allies”, is laughable to the extreme. There were never 6 million dead in those camps, the remains were never found despite thorough digging of the entire areas, the fuel was never there to burn them, nor the incinerators.
But….couldnt we say the substance of this genocide is that communists, joos, JW’s, disabled, coloured were murdered due to racist supremacy fascist ideology?
So the crime against the daily life joos were there. The Zionists were on the contrary secure everywhere, and this is the real crime story.
Source?
Why does everyone get all blasé about the way Jews were treated in WW2, as if 1.1 million as opposed to 6 (or whatever various revisionists say) was just a walk in the park?
And what’s a few cattle cars, honestly, bloody Jews always complaining about those cattle cars and ghettos and being turned into industrial byproducts, having their gold fillings shipped back to Germany etc. (sarcasm).
Holocaust imagery – drilled into every child for the past 60 years – played no small part in helping to deescalate Covid authoritarianism. Yet we’re apparently happy just to trash it at a moment’s notice.
The hubristic complacence really puzzles me.
– I do not understand the squeamishness over the use of gas. I strongly favour using poison gas against uncivilised tribes. It would spread a lively terror. -Winston Churchill, 1920
– Between 1940-06 and 1945-05, British and US forces bombed 1,570 French cities and towns, killing 68,778 civilians. – Wikipedia, 2019
– Churchill initiated the covert bombing of German civiians; USA followed. A raid on one city killed 50,000 people, and a raid on another killed 40,000. This was to provoke a raid on London. The British Air Force rejected Churchill’s order to use poison gas on Germany, and to reduce Rome to rubble. At the end of the war, Britain and USA killed 100,000 at Dresden. Churchill personally directed the war like Hitler, producing one misadventure after another. -David Irving’s book quoted by Paul Roberts, 2019
What is your point? It’s not a competition. The fact the Nazis were evil doesn’t preclude Churchill or anyone else being evil too.
There are excellent historical and even eye witness accounts of this period. You really don’t need to make stuff up.
One source book that’s worth looking at is “In Broad Daylight” by Father Patrick Desbois. Its written using material from numerous eye witnesses and its message is that “Genocide doesn’t happen without the neighbors” (or rather, in a vacuum — people notice). In it you’ll find out how to manage burying hundreds of bodies while maintaining a semblance of public health — yes, its all thought out, right down to calculating hole sizes, organizing the digging and refilling, quantities of lime needed and so on.
I saw a recent video of Matt Hancock, the Midazolam Kid on twitter, he seems to have earned his spurs. From the rather beige, slightly apologetic, not over confident covid minister, he’s developed into a real uncompromising, masterful thug.
Very true, we have a tendency to over-analyze the “effects” rather than the “cause”.
Comprehending that so many of these large scale events are planned-out decades ahead is very destabilizing, most will shift their attention elsewhere.
Over-analyzing the targeted population, or the middle-managers, benefits the planners.
OT: ‘Bored’ Caitlin now trying to backpedal on her tolerance of ‘pandemic measures’
https://twitter.com/DanielLMcAdams/status/1663003250830856192
Because, says she:
She really is a disgusting piece of work.
She’s an obvious fraud. Why does anyone like/follow her? Her ability to be so condescending when blatantly wrong is truly impressive. This one is my favourite:
“My decision to focus on nuclear brinkmanship with Russia and China over vaccines and lockdowns has been thoroughly vindicated by history.”
If she truly believes this, she is as delusional as they come. Although I’m sure she has made an impact in the prevention of WWIII. Thanks Caitlin!
Yup, she’s the type who dares to be arrogant when she’s been caught lying. It’s almost something to admire, in its utter revoltingness.
Just like our owners, isn’t she? Smug. Arrogant. A seemingly good liar when necessary. She provides a handy excuse and comfort for those who went along with the mandates, lockdowns, shaming, job loss, and all that talk about incarcerating the unvaccinated, etc. Now that some of them have seen just what is on the other side of that little wall, she’s issuing her mea culpa and giving her fans one as well.
She’s nothing special at all, she’s one of far too many who scream that they “didn’t know” when they had both the intellectual capability and the time to do their own research. And it’s not like one had to do a lot of digging to find out that even the owners were saying the magic shot does not make one immune, does not stop transmission and is not even a guarantee against “getting covid.” Disgusting.
But hey, I’m sure she makes nice bank doing it, and she can tell herself she’s really fighting the good fight, the big fight that all those who were angry over a bit of coercion just weren’t focused enough on without her stellar intellect do it for them. Her day will come. When she figures out that she too is easily expendable watch her outrage over how they could turn so quickly on her and those like her when they were just doing as they were told.
does not make one immune, does not stop transmission
Always keep in mind whether there was anything to be immune against or to transmit to others. Moreover, most of the related totalitarianism – including confinement to hospitals, inappropriate treatment and withholding of urgent reliable treatment for real illnesses – was intended to boost the statistics.
All true. But still sad that she got herself injected and may eventually feel the karma.
Her point is, its better to be in a concentration camp than be nuked. Who can argue against that :-D?
I’d rather be nuked.
Well said.
But there could be a positive way of looking at it. She is using a new placating tone which might suggest to some of her fawning admirers that she has been on the wrong side of this all along.
After the Bomb is dropped the local hospital will be manned by a skeleton crew…
She would rather others were hauled off to a concentration camp than she be nuked, you mean.
I take it that you would not concur with this view from Philip Roddis:
That’s the kind of thing you read and …. well, what can you say?
I mean really. I had intended to go into some big spiel there but on reading those words again I feel this immense deflation. Perhaps a couple of pain killers and an early bed would help?
OMFG! I didn’t know her routine was that successful. Withering, perhaps, intelligent? Not as much. And a great deal less honest.
On perusing Caitlin’s comments charting her …umm … bold determination to tackle the …umm … real problems of war in Ukraine, I realise that that old Ukraine manoeuvre was a huge bell chime to signal the resumption of Good Old Leftie Gripe Time. And with nary a flicker of the eye they bolted back to the benches for The Big Fret. You know the one. The one that makes a lot of noise and leaves you feeling “Yeah Right On! Tell it like it is!” … but which leaves not the slightest hint of an actual detail about anything that anyone can actually put their finger on. Evidence for the prosecution? Well, have a look at the post that so impressed Philip:
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2023/05/12/you-dont-have-to-choose-between-happiness-and-being-informed/
Did Caitlin prove herself as a warrior for truth? Was she big hearted and witheringly intelligent? Did she cut through the crap and the cant with unfailing accuracy?
?
Umm …
What the fuck did she actually say there?
“… we live in a mind-controlled dystopia where everything is fake and stupid.”
We certainly do! Examples? Oh hang on a bit she’s not finished yet,
“The politicians lie, the news media lie, the movies lie, the internet lies, the advertisements lie, the shows between the advertisements lie. They lie about our world, they lie about our government, they lie about what’s important, how we should think, what we should value, and how we should measure our level of success and worthiness as human beings. That’s what you get when you live in a civilization that’s made of lies, under an empire that’s held together by lies.”
Yes yes yes! … umm examples?
Ooh I can think of a big one! I mean a really big one!
Covid!
Nope it ain’t there.
Transgenderism!
Nope it ain’t there.
Climate change!
Nope it ain’t there.
There is nothing there at all!
I only skimmed through those effusions, but I’m a better person already.
Meanwhile, she continues to dig… 😂
The Roots Of Modern Eco-Terrorism: From MK Ultra And The Unabomber To Maurice Strong And Yuval Harari
“A century after the Civil War, President Kennedy also took aim at the rot of the closed system ideologues then beginning to latch onto the levers of policy and culture saying:
“Malthus argued a century and a half ago that man, by using up all his available resources, would forever press on the limits of subsistence, thus condemning humanity to an indefinite future of misery and poverty. We can now begin to hope and, I believe, know that Malthus was expressing not a law of nature, but merely the limitation then of scientific and social wisdom.”
…it isn’t technology which is intrinsically good or evil, nor is overpopulation a genuine problem, but rather it is our willingness to tolerate evil ideas shaping the behaviour of technology and political systems that results in those systems turning fascist and collapsing into dark ages.”
It is common sense that overpopulation will eventually become a problem since the Earth is round and hence there is only so much space… The biblical command to multiply and spread and take over the Earth needs to be rejected from the human mind as it goes against nature.
The Mayans had a different take on technology that has nothing to do with good and evil. They believed that the ideas for technological inventions come into the human mind as gifts from spirits, and the spirits require acknowldgment and thanks in the form of rituals and offerings.
If these were not done, the spirits can turn nasty and exact payment from humans for the technology.
The Mayans did not omit the invention of the wheel and advanced weapons because they were stupid, but because they were wise. The cost is too high. This is probably why they abandoned their cities and went back to stone age life in the jungle before the armed and diseased parasites from Europe showed up.
https://www.thesunmagazine.org/issues/304/saving-the-indigenous-soul
Technology advances and weapons tend to go together. A rifle or a pistol are made to kill- there is no other application for them. Firearms are more advanced than swords and also make it much easier to kill, and from a distance; which makes it easy for a even a child to kill another human being. Imagine the psychological consequences of that on the child.
So, as you can see some tech is instrinsically more “evil” than other.
The internet began as a military project and is actually being used for mass brain washing- much more so than TV. It can be argued that the basic intent behind the creation of the internet (control) is malevolent even if the people developing it were not conscious of being evil. See Google’s early motto “Don’t be evil” – no longer in use of course as they are completely up Satan’s rectum and basically a CIA operation.
Genocide made easy: blame the victim. Like the husband beating his wife then accusing her with a heartfelt “Why did you make me do this?”
This wife one is a bit tricky.
Actually women exists who want to be beaten, as they say, a woman need to feel a mans strength, that a strong man protect them, that a man care about them. Attention.
You also have really nasty women who made something that deserved some slaps, to get the message.
The other side is men with low self value who react in jealousy, drunk, or sociopaths.
The psychopath’s “blame the victim” made by Western deep states is one of their most ugly and disgusting sides. Allen Dulles/CIA per info made the “torture without borders”.
Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration [FDA] joined in trying to keep secret/out of public awareness (for 75 years) the gruesome fact: 1,223 people were killed by mRNA injections in the first 90 days after the widespread mRNA injection rollout.
It took a lawsuit to uncover the gruesome truth.
This glaring fact can only become properly recognized and/or understood as undeniable proof of premeditated mass murder…
Have not you yet learned that premeditated mass murder is ok, even legal ,if the perpetrator is a private for profit corporation? People get up set when corporation appointed leaders of governments commit murder because governments are suppose to protect the people from the corporations they charter, but every knows governments protect and empower the oligarchs and it is the oligarchs that own the corporations, and that governments privatize their monopoly powers and give the privatized powers to oligarch owned global corporations. Monopoly power is suppose to be an exclusive characteristic of government. Governments are suppose to protect the people from private use of monopoly power.
You want to solve the anti-humanity problems of the world eliminate private ownership or use of patent and copyright monopoly power. Until you do, nothing will ever change: the oligarch will use his or her corporation to own the people that governments pay from the people’s [taxpayer’s] own money. Its not premeditated mass murder its business as usual.
As a Jew living in New York, I know some awake friends who still would recoil from comparing the scamdemic with the Holocaust, but I’m not one.
Comparison is not equation. And I think we have all now had firsthand experience of how societies like Nazi Germany contrive to divide their people against themselves and turn a majority into the persecutors of a minority.
We’ve all now witnessed how quickly and seamlessly our medical institutions can be retooled into places of death and incarceration. Only a minority of physicians or nurses expressing any reservations.
And yes, few of our citizens did much to try to prevent it. Though a lot of readers here, and OffG itself, are heroic exceptions who did put themselves on the line to tell the truth
Watch yourself – comparing genocide with genocide landed Bahkdi in court
I must admit that I too have become obsessed with the holocaust since the start of the covid scam. I was firmly in the cock up theory camp until December 2020 and then one long night it suddenly struck me, this was no accident or cock up or sunk cost fallacy. This was in fact, cold, calculated conspiracy. At that point I became obsessed and watched endless holocaust footage on youtube, I read countless accounts of what had happened. How?? Barbarism beyond belief but why didn’t anyone stop it, why??? why didn’t the jews themselves fight back on the platforms or when they were being murdered in their 1000s in eastern europe, gathered in large groups, men, women and children, shot in the head at point blank range, often by a relatively small group of men, what did they have to lose, at least they could just make it a little bit harder for their murderers. But nothing, killing became easy and once you cross that line as every good serial killer knows, you pass into a different moral universe to most people. But this was lots of people passing into that barbaric universe, millions! But as Hannah Arendt has captured so well, evil was ordinary, it became part of the day to day and you weave it into your day to day, everyone does. I read ‘ordinary men’ about the 101 battalion, the most efficient mass killing machine ever made up of ordinary german men, just like your brothers, fathers and husbands, 80% of them turned into efficient killers. It kind of confirmed that given the right circumstances most people would turn against innocent people and kill them without a second thought. This was at the height of my covid scam terror, i was convinced that’s where we were headed. But I also thought, well maybe we deserved it, maybe we had been the “good germans” during the genocidal episodes of our own governments in the middle east most recently but also in south america, south east asia etc. I did join demos to mark my paultry resistence to such acts but what good did they do?? Otherwise i just got on with my life which was pretty ok, meanwhile millions were being slaughtered by my government who i paid taxes to to aid them in this endeavour. Evil is very ordinary and we are all capable of it.
To follow the crowd is a default setting in a lot of animals including man.
It actually makes a lot of sense to group together as a form of defense.
The problem is that this trait has been used as a weapon against us.
And there we have it in a nutshell.
Humans are NOT animals, despite sharing numerous hereditary characteristics with them.
It makes sense for animals to ‘follow the crowd’, because it increases the likelihood of them not being eaten by more dangerous animals.
But humans, as they are today, follow the crowd for other reasons:
Mostly laziness – to avoid having to think for themselves, and yet thinking for yourself is exactly the thing that makes you human.
We have that choice.
Animals don’t.
Choices aren’t in the animal “Essentials For Survival” kit, even if many animals can claim more than adequate compensation in the fact that they have sense organs which are far more developed than ours.
I think the biggest reason humans follow the crowd is simply because “there’s safety in numbers.”
I don’t think humans in general have completely shed their animal roots. The “more dangerous animals” which might eat them have morphed into “The Other,” which might rob and kill them.
Watch “One Third of the Holocaust” documentary and prepare to think.
I think you are defending the very propaganda system that ran convid by believing everything they say about WW2.