WATCH: Epidemic of Fraud
The award winning documentary Epidemic of Fraud presents an alternative narrative of the “Covid Pandemic”.
The film argues that early treatment options for “Covid19” – such as ivermectin and most especially hydroxychloroquine – were suppressed in order to boost vaccine profits. It also suggests that the alleged “virus” itself may have the been result of gain of function research carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, with funding from Anthony Fauci.
Does that story hold together? We’ve embedded the entire channel and encourage you to watch it to make up your own minds.
Personally, I have very strong doubts about this narrative, which I have made clear in multiple articles (such as this one and this one).
This quote from Dr Mike Yeadon, in his recent post on the Exposing The Darkness SubStack, sums it up perfectly [emphasis added]:
THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC. No new illness. Nothing changed anywhere in all causes mortality in the run up to the fraudulent declaration by WHO of “a pandemic” […]Don’t hero worship the proponents of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and the like, because they’re not your friends. They’re helping the perpetrators. By reinforcing the notion of “early treatment” of a non-existent disease, they’ll have helped reinforce the propaganda that there was a pandemic and that there might be other pandemics.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Ivermectin & Population Control Poison: a Deep Dive into a Nobel Prize Winning Medicine.
Avermectins are a class of insecticides/pesticides.
A Nigerian study linked Ivermectin to infertility.
Rabbit, mice and rat studies on Avermectins have shown increased stillbirths, lower viability of offspring and birth defects.
Did OffG reply to Nass’s Feb 1, 2021 rebuttal?
Note:
a) I assume it was a third-party who asked Nass to comment.
b) The Feb 1, 2021 rebuttal is included as one-of-the-three in the May 3, 2024 Substack
—
https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/02/again-is-virus-real.html
Meryl Nass
Feb 1, 2021
Is the Virus Real?
I continue to be asked if the virus is real. I answered this question in 2 prior blog posts, below. But Off-Guardian has a new article [1] claiming the virus is fake, and I was again asked to comment.
[1] https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/31/phantom-virus-in-search-of-sars-cov-2
—
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/my-three-is-the-virus-real-articles
My three “Is the virus real?” articles from 2020 and 2021
Several readers demanded I supply the goods, so here they are. Enough for me on this.
Meryl Nass
May 3, 2024
”The award winning documentary”
What award? Is that just another marketing ploy for this very long commercial for the poisonous drug that no-one really needs?
The Hollywood agent making and marketing this film presents himself as ”a storyteller”. And that’s what it is: a fictional story, claiming hydroxicloroquine is ”ancient”, ”a life-saver”, and something people should take for the fictional disease called the covid pandemic.
Furthermore, it would be suicidal for any regime to vehemently seek to create such a pathogen. Bioweapons are intended to be delivered to specific target areas, except in the science fiction wherein immunity from a bioweapon that is both extremely virulent and extremely contagious can be reliably delivered to one’s own population and soldiers. – Denis Rancourt Here’s a scenario for generating localised spikes in covid-like illnesses. A) The MRC (Monolithic & Ruthless Conspiracy; a.k.a. The Invisible Enemy) operates a gain-of-function biolab in China; and it creates an assortment of SARS variants of various properties – virulence, pathogenicity, infectivity, novelty, etc. B) each virus has been tested in lab conditions on healthy humans; together with treatment protocols such as HCQ, zinc, ivermectin, etc. C) the planned delivery method is: 1) twenty healthy individuals (perhaps vit. C & D deficient) will be exposed to a selected virus in lab conditions. 2)… Read more »
There’s a big difference between creating it and actively releasing it.
Create it? The evidence is that they did do this, and it was funded by Fauci.
Did they release it? No.
What I bet is that it escaped. Left on a door knob by a researcher who got it wrong. Or those piglets they tested it on, and then killed. Did a lab technician make a few extra on the side by selling them off in the wet market?
The first is deliberate, the second is cock up.
One of the major arguments against the escape theory is that the “pandemic” was planned and scheduled – that is, to occur immediately after Davos 2020 (Jan 20-24). And “escapes” don’t run to schedule! Another is that pointed out by Rancourt – that viral bioweapons need to be targeted. If a virulent virus had leaked from Wuhan, it would have mutated and degraded after going through multiple transmissions. And therefore wouldn’t cause a pandemic. Also, people who are seriously sick tend to self-isolate. Whereas the less virulent strains spread faster and create natural immunity. The method I describe above (individuals exposed in lab prior to getting on planes) would create targeted deliveries of the engineered virus and expose large numbers of unprotected people. Thereby generating localised spikes of potentially severe covid-like illnesses. This strategy is vulnerable to the counter-measure of restricting entry from China. But it’s possible that a few… Read more »
Is there any evidence of any virus created by scientists in a lab?
Please show that evidence.
What would be the reason for creating a new flu/cold virus, if they could do it, as there are already more than 200 different viruses causing colds and many types of the flu?
Of course, I can’t “prove” anything with regard to what they do in these level-4 biolabs and if “gain of function” for viruses is a real thing. Same as I can’t prove HAARP; or DEWs; or chemtrails; or nanothermite; or graphene nanosheets. However, unless you’ve got some credible evidence otherwise, I think it’s a reasonable assumption that there’s some truth to it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosafety_level#Biosafety_level_4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain-of-function_research
So as to create localised spikes of severe covid-like illness – and thereby feed the “pandemic” propaganda.
In 2020, the year of the pandemic, there were no excess deaths anywhere but where people were murdered. Remdesivir and midazolam were used to kill helpless people in the United States and in the UK. It’s easy to kill people in hospitals, just overdose morphine or other drugs. There’s been plenty of evidence about those things. Also, news about how the first covid victim in Africa was killed by people in the street because they believed he was infected with covid (he wasn’t); nurses and staff leaving a care home in Spain because of fear of covid, leaving all those people to die in their beds without food or drink. Victims of covid are like that: victims of negligence, abuse, violence and murder. Covid-like illness is just flu, cold or other respiratory illness. Or it can be anything else, too. A man in the USA who was shot eight times… Read more »
Yes, I agree with all of that; except maybe some of the assertions and interpretations in the last couple of sentences. And none of it contradicts what I’ve posted.
What’s retarded about the realisation that viruses as a contagious self replicating entity, and has NEVER been proven to exist, either scientifically or intellctually? I’d love to know.
Two questions:
A) is there a top-flight scientist (e.g. Peter Duesberg, Kary Mullis, etc) who supports the no-viruses / no-contagion position?
B) is there a published paper to explain myxomatosis in terms of the no-viruses / no-contagion position?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myxomatosis
Yes, there have been many scientists and doctors who’ve denied germ theory and viruses, ever since germ theory and “viruses” were invented by the medical-chemical cartel who knowingly poison people, animals and wildlife but cover it up, claiming invisible microbes are responsible, to avoid class action suits.
Myxomatosis; don’t need a scientific paper to know it’s pesticides or poison. The most likely candidate being DDT, an organochlorine responsible for the “polio” outbreaks in the US and the extinction of some bird species. DDT was being widely sprayed on crops and grass exactly the same year the faux governments claimed they introduced “myxomatosis”. All alleged viral and bacterial illnesses are actually from toxins.
I asked for just one – “a top-flight scientist” – i.e. a name. And I asked for a paper, not your theorising. But as I thought, you can’t supply either!
You wouldn’t know how to read or interpret a scientific paper if your life depended on it. If you did you’d already know “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False”
Its the most cited and read paper and analysis in scientific history.
There’s no such thing as a “top flight scientist”. There’s only highly promoted, publicized academics like Dueseberg and Mullis who served as controlled opposition voices for HIV, which like all viruses, doesn’t even exist, never existed.
Virology doesn’t even follow the scientific method, not that you’d know what that is, either.
Among other things, the scientific method involves the publishing of observations, experimental procedures, data, results, conclusions, hypotheses, arguments, etc. It’s done so that other people can find flaws, raise counter arguments, reproduce, supplement, etc. There’s no requirement that they be published in establishment journals. Instead, they could be published independently. I’ve seen such papers for the toxin theories of polio, but apparently nobody’s bothered for the toxin theory of myxomatosis.
The scientific method is a specific set of steps that must include control groups in controlled experiments. When controls aren’t used, the data is invalid and the hypothesis unproven. And, in order for a scientific theory to be valid it must be falsifiable. Controls already disproved virology. It’s not science it’s scientific fraud. Nobody did tox studies of dead rabbits because nobody cares. That’s not an argument for viruses, or proof of viral existence. There’s no necessity to disprove unproven theories. * No viral particles ever found. * No viral particles ever isolated. * No viral particles ever purified. * No viral particles proven to cause disease or illness in any animal or human. * No scientific evidence of contagion. * Contagion still unproven, in animals and humans in all studies. * Koch’s Postulates never fulfilled for bacteria or viruses. *No scientific evidence proving germ theory. * Germ Theory was… Read more »
Having skimmed through Rancourt’s essay “There Was No Pandemic”, I draw the following conclusions. It does not reject the possibility that there was a new pathogen and illness. Moreover, a population-wide study cannot demonstrate that there were not highly localised, virulent pathogens. If such pathogens had been released in specific locations, they could have caused some of the reported effects of severe illness. But they would not have spread far among the wider population for the reason stated by Rancourt. And they would have had little effect on all-cause mortality. Hence, the debate about gain-of-function research and releases of pathogens is potentially very much relevant. However, rather than releasing viruses, my guess is that they used a different method to create localised illness. It may have been emf or something connected with the 2019 flu jabs. The purpose was not to kill people directly, but to get them sufficiently ill… Read more »
So, OffG’s secret unknown editorial writer has finally come around to acknowledging directly that there is no real scientific evidence of any virus existing or any particular disease behind the alleged ‘pandemic’. Can’t say I didn’t call it. Now do Germ Theory!
I have made a recent discovery, if you can call it that, since nobody else appears to have mentioned it anywhere. It applies to anyone taking certain prescription drugs and what has been reported in the literature concerning the adverse effects of certain prescription and over the counter drugs that are touted to produce the following adverse effects namely, Influenza or Flu-like symptoms/Illness also referred to as Influenza Syndrome. Presumably, these effects will only surface if the drugs are taken on a regular or long-term basis, and/or the person has a certain co-morbidity, susceptibility or vulnerability to the medication. It makes one wonder how many people in the population taking these drugs (sometimes more than one from different categories) are diagnosed with alleged “viral” Flu or Covid-19 and its alleged “variants”. For example, people taking certain antipsychotic drugs have been reported with Influenza as a “side-effect”, people taking certain Influenza… Read more »
Interesting find. Thank you!
Looks like the basis of a great paper!
“Over 150 drugs or categories of drugs have been reported to cause pulmonary disease.” Merck Manual
But wouldn’t you know it… there’s a new drug that prevents “flu” (inflammatory response to poisoning) injury. Lol.
It’s interesting that some of the anti-inflammatory classes of compounds cause “influenza syndrome.” Their A-Infl. mechanism of action must be influencing cytokines other than IL-6.
Yes, there’s another problem too concerning people taking more than one prescription drug who may also suffer from low grade ‘silent’ (chronic) inflammation. Anyone who suffers from this form of inflammation usually has no manifest symptoms. It would probably only take another drug in the categories I’ve already mentioned ‘break the camel’s back ‘ to ramp up the inflammation with an acute phase reaction with cytokine release affecting any cells, tissues and organ systems in those people who have become susceptible to influenza. Of course, there may be the relevant cells, tissues and organ systems already encumbered with metabolic waste and exogenous toxic material including the extra-cellular matrix (ECM) which has a ‘filter’ which usually only allows molecules of a certain size and electrical charge to pass through to reach the cells. This just adds to the problem if there is an additional blockade as the ECM is also a… Read more »
Personally I also have very strong doubts about this “new ” disease named Covid. I have come to the conclusion that it is only the flu or common cold marketing in new wrapping
That’s exactly my conclusion, too. Existing illnesses were simply rebranded as “covid”.
That’s all they needed to do and then unleash a constant barrage of fear through the media.
Does the argument that “medical masks are no good for filtering viruses” support the pandemic narrative? To talk about “filtering viruses” just reinforces the propaganda that there’s something which could in theory be filtered. Surely, the correct answer is that there are no viruses worth worrying about – or no viruses at all – and that’s why we shouldn’t wear masks!
https://rumble.com/vvpjc2-you-are-being-lied-to-about-masks-former-pfizer-chief-scientist-dr.-mike-ye.html
Feb 23, 2022
You Are Being Lied To About Masks – With Former Pfizer Chief Scientist Dr. Mike Yeadon
“They (masks) have been tested in proper formal controlled studies and they make no difference whatsoever to the transmission of respiratory viruses.”
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Pfizer chief scientist, discusses the logic of mask wearing during the pandemic and calls medical masks what they are: “splash guards”.
From Episode 22 of “Tea Time” On Children’s Health Defense TV
Hmm; where have we heard this before?
https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/dr-yeadon-asks-dr-tess-lawrie-to
Donate! Donate! Donate!
https://stopcrimesagainsthumanity.org/donate
But there was plenty of fraud to go around — unreliable numbers, propaganda, fear-mongering, threats to get the shots, horrible harms to children and young people, so much still to unravel. But to say there was no sickness at all, I don’t think that’s true. While overblown and mostly a danger to sick or old people, I did question, as a journalist, real docs who saw and treated early Covid deaths. It was real. Off-guardian needs to stay on the story and keep clear and critical thinking, question real people, so as not to lose credibility.
There was no NEW disease.
And many real doctors lost their jobs for trying to treat an actual nasty virus and were blocked from doing so. Saying there was nothing seems a swing too far and discredits dissenters from all different areas, who are coming together. Again beware of provocatuers, agitators, those who seek to divide and conquer.
There was no NEW disease.
Please look at this group below. I have heard reputable, questioning, and independently- thinking doctors speak in person about trying to treat Covid patients and now about treating vaccine injuries. Be wary of divide and conquer and psyop strategies to weaken dissent and disorient dissenters. There was a real disease outbreak, I think, and real deaths from a serious chest virus or something. The push for an EUA was also real, so suppression of early treatment was needed. Lots of deaths in the beginning, and doctors were barred from treating with medicines that worked. When people say there was nothing, when real people saw real illness and death — critics look more untrustworthy. Please have another look. I worry when comments like above are posted, questioners will be more widely dismissed as quacks. This harms us. More than one truth may be present at once. Maybe a few truths. I… Read more »
There was no NEW disease.
You mentioned lots of death in the beginning. Real people have seen illness and death from the beginning of humanity. Real people, like myself and many, also did NOT see any death pertaining to the so called virus.
That is why the post mentioned (citing Yeadon) all-cause mortality, something that Denis Rancourt has also gone into in depth. Look up his Twitter account for links. The reason he looked into all-cause mortality is precisely because mortality does not lie. Governments ALWAYS have the numbers of who died.
Then there was also the media. A newspaper editor even admitted to me recently that THEY (the paper) attributed deaths to “Covid” even when the Health Ministry did not… just to scare people and sell more papers. The fact that the HM then chose to remain silent tells you how deep this con goes.
Another “fringe” documentary explicitly confirming the existence of a death causing virus and the benefits of one pharmaceutic toxin over another pharmaceutic toxin. Hosted on Youtube, that’s all you need to know.
Mike Yeadon has it correct. A close look shows the whole virus world is a scam. No science behind it at all.
My last close look turned up slightly more ambiguous results. Lol.
Do tell. How “slightly”?
Would I be right to assume you are not about to make reference to any actually controlled studies, i.e. in which the variable of a so-called virus is in any way credibly isolated and demonstrated to be the cause of “cytopathic effects”? And if so, why are you still going on about this thing without ever making a rational argument for virology as a methodologically sound discipline?
The ‘isolation’ question is a straw man, taken out of context, unless you can also demonstrate that ‘isolation’ is the only valid proof for the virus hypothesis. I haven’t seen this demonstrated. There are myriad ways to ‘prove’ a hypothesis in science, so let’s engage with the whole picture, or let’s drop these layman arguments. A2
If not isolation then what are the “valid proofs” to which you refer? Given your adamance they must be abundant.
‘Valid proofs’ would be infinite. Being able to repeatably, experimentally predict things. Trends in data. Witnessing particles influence other particles which you can measure and/or isolate. Such circuitous paths are necessary in many areas of science. Rhys Jaggar, who posts here regularly and used to work in this field apparently, may be able to chip in his two cents. He often points out that crystallising viruses has been done for a hundred years and viruses have been used in many other areas of science to make huge advancements. They have been instrumental in furthering the genetic sciences, for example. Tbh I think most sciences would say evidence was abundant. I am fully happy to admit, however, I’m not a virologist and I don’t know. However I do know how to spot an illogical argument. You can’t disprove something within reasonable limits by creating a straw man and knocking it down,… Read more »
However I do know how to spot an illogical argument. It would appear you do not. What is illogical is the pretense that epidemiology could in any way form a basis for the discipline of virology since foundational, controlled virology experiments are absolutely necessary in order to justify the causal attribution which said epidemiology relies on in the first place. In order to interpret an epidemiological study as supporting the theory of a virus you have to assume 1) that the proxy marker used to indicate the virus is exclusively associated with such an entity, and 2) that this so-called virus is a direct cause of the disease symptoms in question. Without scientifically establishing these two foundational premises, you have no basis to credibly interpret any epidemiological data as indicative of a virus. You are claiming that if you simply do a great number of epidemiological studies, you can exempt yourself from… Read more »
You are claiming that if you simply do a great number of epidemiological studies, you can exempt yourself I didn’t claim any such thing lol I am saying I haven’t seen virology demonstrated as completely bogus. Epidemiology is the statistical study of patterns of symptoms/disease spread, btw, and is not the same as virologists studying virology. What you have done here is write a dense screed making many irrational assumptions. Eg. That all epidemiology is baseless, and all virology is baseless, because viral isolation has been brought into question. A) There’s no reason to suppose that issues surrounding fulfilling Koch’s postulates should make all virology tumble like a house of cards, except your assumption that it does, and B) epidemiology is a separate discipline, as I explained above, based on statistical observation. You are mixing your disciplines and using a viral isolation straw man to create a circular argument. That’s… Read more »
I am saying I haven’t seen virology demonstrated as completely bogus. “Nothing can be proven true to one who is sufficiently determined not to believe it.” For some reason, I am going to restate the argument one more time: Epidemiology, at least as far as health science, is completely pointless without the ability to attribute causality to the statistical data you generate. If you want to claim to be doing science, this causal assessment cannot be based on mere assumption. Without reliable and reproducible documentation of the biological properties of alleged viruses, these properties are functionally simply assumed. This is why “foundational, controlled virology experiments” are required before you can credibly postulate that any epidemiological data says LITERALLY ANYTHING about any virus. As I say, viruses have been inextricably linked… A bold claim for someone who refuses to scientifically document the basic properties of such entities. I am done now.… Read more »
You don’t understand my point. You are talking past me, speaking extremely broadly, saying not much of anything. A2
The irony is Tommy, methodology, ontology and epistemology all derive from philosophy not science, that also includes empiricism and rationalism. What passes as science is invariably a muddy mixture of them all! Unfortunately, not many people seem to acknowledge the fact, and not many see it as a problem.
What’s indisputable is that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, whether used against an imaginary respiratory illness or real ones passed off as a deadly novel virus, had to be wiped from the board to permit the emergency authorisation of the vaccines. Whatever we think about the existence or no of SARS-CoV-2, these molecules are effective treatments for many real maladies, so that what the “front-line doctors” were seeing might well have been positive patient responses to many things uncovid, including panic. The “lab-leak” and the whole Wuhan hoo-ha have for a while now been looking increasingly like a red pangolin, as this leak in the The Narrative becomes a controlled flow (and note that vaccine harms are now being afforded limited hangout in the New York Times and Telegraph). So-called gain-of-function research does exist and was farmed out by Fauci to the Chinese bat lady but can only be seen as another… Read more »
“What’s indisputable is that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, whether used against an imaginary respiratory illness or real ones passed off as a deadly novel virus, had to be wiped from the board to permit the emergency authorisation of the vaccines.”
The following ‘fact check’ says otherwise:
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-emergency-use-873264912929
Obviously, fact checkers manipulate the truth or more often try to deflect away from the claim they intend to refute but in this case they have tackled it directly.
The question then is, were they lying? I cannot find anything to contradict them?
Do you have links that can prove the AP fact check was a lie? If so, I would like to have something I can use in the future.
I don’t converse with bots.
So I am bot according to you. Well, that’s a first in the short time I have been commenting on OffG. How did you arrive at that conclusion? Because I answered two of you similarly? Yes,I did, since it was relevant to both of your comments. I simply asked you for a link or links, yet, you provided nothing. Was not trying to nudge you trust a ‘fact checker’ but wanted to see if you had something to back up your statement – since I could find nothing new since the date of the AP ‘fact check’ – so that I could use it in the future to support what you stated. If I make a statement and someone asks me for a link I will provide it to back up my point. There is too much bullshit in some quarters of alternative media that does none of us a… Read more »
According to Lioness of Judah Substack, the following is a statement by Mike Yeadon:
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-yeadon-comments-on-epidemic-of
That’s a big and potentially libelous claim to make against identifiable medical professionals. I personally doubt that somebody with Yeadon’s experience would ever make such a statement – even if he believed it to be true.
Quoted quotes ain’t necessarily so. All kinds of nefarious actors, human or otherwise, misquote or just make things up in order to discredit people like Yeadon. Then it gets passed on, as it has now. Any of us can say a thing in exasperation at an unguarded moment that we might regret later having said.
In order for a comment to be libelous it generally has to name or otherwise identify a specific person. The reason for this is obvious: if a person was not named or otherwise identified their claim of personally being damaged by the remarks is tenuous at best. How do you imagine that they are “identifiable” as you claim?
The statement opens:
Yeadon is specifically referring to the documentary. He then states:
Consequently, all the medical professionals in the documentary are identified; and Yeadon has accused them all of being frauds in treating a non-existent illness.
To me, that’s cut and dried libel.
If he has identified them, that potential is there. However you are overlooking you glaring thing: Yeadon is correct and thus no libel has occurred.
There’s a lot of frontline medical professionals who are absolutely convinced there was an illness(es) and there was something new about it. Some of them appear dodgy and may be part of a psyop, but I think most are genuine. Unless I see compelling evidence to the contrary, I’m inclined to believe them. I doubt they’d bother suing Yeadon, but the point I was making is that someone with that level of experience wouldn’t create the opportunity. It’s only a month ago that Steyn lost to Michael Mann. Likewise, Yeadon could find himself tied up in a lengthy case regardless of the rights and wrongs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Steyn#Defamation_lawsuit In February 2024, a civil trial jury in Washington found that Mark Steyn and Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) blogger Rand Simberg defamed and injured climatologist Michael E. Mann in blog posts. The jury awarded Mann $1 in compensatory damages from each writer. It awarded… Read more »
The theory I’m currently drifting towards in that Yeadon is a slimeball. That he’s published these statement on Telegram knowing that they will then get circulated on Substack by other people.
Change my mind!
I did a considerable amount of research at the site usrtk for US Right to Know. They have an extensive archive regarding Covid as well as other issues with Monsanto, etc. There is so much there you really have to spend some time and search. But documentation is always preferable to speculation, and multiple viewpoints are helpful.
There are dangerous labs that do have accidents and more and more all the time. They don’t safeguard properly and they mess around with things they don’t understand.
Criminal fraud. Quite sickening.
The film argues that early treatment options for “Covid19” – such as ivermectin and most especially hydroxychloroquine – were suppressed in order to boost vaccine profits.
The reason for the narrative rejection of alternative treatments such as HCQ and Ivermectin was because it would have made mandating the jabs problematic, if other treatments were publicly promoted as effective.
As far as vaccine profits are concerned – I have said it before but will say it again – the use of saline would have been far more profitable longer term since there would have been no damaging ‘side’ effects caused by the jabs for what was a non-existent named (Covid-19) disease.
Rolling Rock, they suppressed alternative treatments because Emergency Use Authorization cannot be legally granted if other treatments exist, so they made it look like they did not so it could be pushed through on an “emergency” basis. Emergencies declared have caused corrupt politicians to bypass many protective laws, like in war for instance. They create fake or false flag emergencies to push through otherwise illegal agendas. It’s messed.up!
I thought that originally too but it has been claimed that EUA was not limited in law by the availability of other treatments eg Ivermectin and HCQ. Obviously, I am aware that the ‘fact checkers’ distort the truth but did they outright lie? I have not found anything to contradict their statements.
Below, is an example of a ‘fact check’ released in Dec 2020 regarding the jab EUA and other treatments.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-emergency-use-873264912929
Quite right. But I believe you’re responding to a chat bot. Have a look at “Rolling Rock’s” reply and compare it to its reply to my own comment above. The repetition and idiot tone is the give-away, as is the hard nudging towards fact checkers and their none-to-subtle endorsement. Other of the comments made under this handle may, of course, be by human accomplices and thereby strike another tone but the purpose is the same.
Un-fucking-believable.
Paranoia or what. See my comment above in reply to your accusation of me being a bot.
Stephen is deluded and not very bright, I’m afraid. He’s far from the realization that there’s highly organized, briefed, centrally coordinated controlled opposition orgs and they all have their scripts, narratives and central players, well in place before these psychological operations are ever taken live.
I had a crash course in the last four years with regard to the realization that the level of infiltration of supposed opposition (ie those we think are in our side) has occured on multiple levels. It is a minefield out there with narratives, counternarratives and misdirection designed to confuse.
Once people accept that there are no saviours and take personal responsibility for their lives, the sooner they can stop wasting their energy and start organising a life standing on their own two feet.
Yes. Exactly. But most aren’t fully awake yet they are in serious, deep denial and still believe the majority of faux narratives and lies that have been told to them since they were children.
Using saline would have been more profitable, but the purpose of all this is not just about money. The purpose is not just to lie and steal, but murder.
There are many ways to murder. Injecting poison is just one. Other methods have been used as well: denying care, denying means of existence, brainwashing people to believe flu will kill them, selling any (dangerous) drugs as the ”miracle cure”. Ivermectin and hydroxycloroquine were advertised to people who were suspicious of the mainstream media.
Trump advertised the combination of hydroxycloroquine and azithromycin in Spring 2020.
As there is no medicine for the flu, there really wasn’t any medicine for covid-19.
If people believe any of these lies, it’s an opportunity to sell them unnecessary stuff, make profit, harm people, kill and mass murder humanity.
I was answering the filmmakers opinion that the jabs were about vaccine profits. Clearly, that was not the motive.
The motive is far more nefarious. Depopulation, sterilization or nanoparticle injection to facilitate transhumanism or disconnection from ‘source’ or our consciousness.
Yes, also experimenting with their ideas about how to combine nanoparticles or whatever into a human body, a global trial for their transhumanist agenda, and they thought they can use all humanity for it as lab rats.
Why just depopulate, when you can potentially make a fortune doing so, by
treatingpoisoning the vaccine recipients again, with chemo, radiation and toxic Rx, months and years later. Poison injections create patients for life, until death.There’s other motivations that aren’t often discussed: As the faux authorities inject and nasal swab with the nano dust and self assembling nano particles, there’s the track and trace (geotagging, MAC address) aspect and also DARPA’s brain initiative which I believe the poison injections are an integral aspect.
I tend to think of the profit motive of say, cancer treatments for the vaccine recipients as another wealth transfer mechanism. Medical insurers, the State (in countries with socialized medical care) or in a smaller proportion of cases, individuals, will be picking up the tab. Ultimately, more and more of the costs will be borne by the State, as medical insurance costs rise and individuals will not be able to afford to pay the premiums. As long as governments can print currency (until a loss of confidence in the markets) they can distribute it to their chosen partners. It is simply a wealth transfer from the State (taxpayers) – until the State collapses through bankruptcy – to corporates and well connected individuals. Also, having a sick population until the people eventually die keeps them docile, weak both physically and mentally plus it makes them dependent on the controlling public private… Read more »
Yes. Multiple ways to transfer wealth. And let’s not forget, there’s multiple industries literally being funded and built on biofascism, data mining, bio rhythms, sensors, software, facial recognition, AI, miniaturization, tracking and tracing humans and behavior, data being the new oil.
So the transition, going from a production, manufacturing and consumer economy, to a licensing, rentier, PPP economy built on humans as the backbone of the IoT, is also a huge aspect of first growing (through mass poisoning) then transitioning to, (by creating emerging markets in the areas I listed above AND faux bankruptcies of the faux nation state corporations) and then sustaining the new global financial model.
What I’ve observed over the last four years is the multiple agendas, schemes and benefits served simultaneously within each psychological operation and hoax.
I didn’t watch the film because I knew it would either directly or indirectly sell the viral delusion. HCQ and Ivermectin were pushed and promoted by the faux freedom movement because these “medications” supported the false premise that [1] there was a virus and a disease that [2] needed to be treated, when there is nothing except seasonal detox (colds and flus) and pneumonia in the elderly that is falsely classified as “flu” in order to sell more poison flu “vaccines”. It’s no coincidence the very same allopaths who shilled these highly toxic meds also shill faux democracy, useless voting and previous to 2020 spent careers injecting babies, children and adults with plenty of other poison injections called “vaccines”. Chloroquines and Avermectins are both classes of INSECTICIDES. They were tested widely on African populations (and animals) with devastating side effects, including infertility, seizures, neurological damage and even death. I believe… Read more »
Absolutely, with the exception of surgery for trauma much of allopathic medicine, especially medications, are either unnecessary or can be substituted using natural plant based alternatives.
It is interesting how we are encouraged to eat a plant based diet, often processed or grown using insectides and herbicides, but are never informed about the healing and medicinal properties of wild plants. Herbal medicine which has no patents has been used for centuries, if not, millenia.
During the Plandemic, I noticed that groups of medical practioneers came together very quickly to form the ‘opposition’ to the jabs but always maintained the key part of the agenda, ie that there was a Covid-19 virus. Certain doctors who spoke out very early on as individuals regarding the veracity of the pandemic itself were excluded from speaking at events organized by these high profile groups.
award winning????? documentary Epidemic of Fraud presents an alternative narrative of the “Covid Pandemic”..WHICH IS DOES NOT. It sells the narrative. Why feature the above.?? How is this any different than ”Died suddenly” (which made mainstream news 👁 ) with The Wuhan Lab Leak and China did it 💤 mixed in with Christianity conversion Conservative nidge nudge. Throw in a Dr adder snake venom and covid was real. which then sells and justify the lockdown for protection, passports to make sure we are safe, Quarantine and Isolation. Testing to make sure.Certain restrictions help lessen the spread!!! The RFK jr shill book also nudge that. The only thing missing was Trump / Boris was bullied 💤 or things would of been worse if the other party was in power shill fear porn. (MSM alt media nicely sold helped install this narrative though to the very unwise) Unless this was a exercise… Read more »
https://open.substack.com/pub/drsambailey/p/the-ivermectin-games?r=1g9lv0&utm_medium=ios
“At its formation in 1947, when the WHO was funded and founded, it was founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language:
“Immunity from legal process of every kind.”
Now, if you didn’t intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution, even investigation for prosecution, of every kind?”
~ Dr. David Martin
Rumours says the label “virus” was invented to avoid paying compensation when industry polluted the air with lung irritating synthetic substances. Thus we have the flue, influenza, lung inflammation, m.m. Without expertise in these matters it sounds logical in my ears.
Unlike most, I dont need some shill fake internet Doctor who appeared during bs19 fake spin us a yeadon who managed to get on all the biggest shills shows in alt media. He appeared everywhere and is now some expert in everything conspiratorially. your standards are low when it comes to how psyops works. wont be long before he sets up an new political party and he and Dr baloney will the doctor of medicine.
Epidemic of Fraud should includes these fake heroes that appeared during bs19 sold to us as experts who also shill a MSM narrative.
How many narratives is that now? Hard to keep track.
The design of flawed lab tests created an artifact of COVID pandemic exactly as those same tests created artifact of nonexistent Bird flu pandemic in 2009. The same useless and discredited PCR tests “found” SARS2 in historical sewage samples from 2018 and from summer of 2019 as they found it in fall 2023 samples predicting 2023-24 new pandemic that never materialized. Why? Because facing with nearly 100% correlation between lab test results of those jabbed WHO/CDC decided to stop testing anyone but those with severe respiratory disease symptom and only if other standard diagnosis was excluded. Puff, predicted pandemic suddenly disappeared as it disappeared in 2009. From nearly 20,000 even vaguely related to COVID medical papers published between 2020 and 2023 at least half were seriously challenged or withdrawn citing severe undisclosed conflict of interests, plagiarism, gross negligence and violation of research principles including manipulation and fabrication of data. Still… Read more »
I’m fascinated to know if you have a link or a source for your statement about half of the medical papers published during Covid having to be withdrawn! A2
Me too. Especially the part about PCR tests. Took a lot of flack from the “fact checkers” who were claiming that Kary Mullis never said anything about the flaws in his tests. Pay no attention to the Nobel Prize winning scientist who invented the test……… Be nice to have more references.
PCR tests only locate the presence of a virus, any virus remains still in the body…. PCR tests run at the levels they were run for the fake Pandemic have a very high rate of false positive anyhow… Remember, they were/are “Free”… HaHaHaaaahahahaaaahahahahaaa….. All your tax dollars and new Printed money went to buying all-those-“FREE”-tests/jabs for you compliant sheeple… CONGRATS….
No PCR can’t detect viral presence. Because the alleged viruses have never been found, isolated or purified, so the genetic sequences can’t be known. They are fabricated (invented) using software programs.
The virus scam is fraud from beginning to end. All positives are false and all negatives are false.
They (alleged original progenitor or parent viruses) also have no determinate conditions of existence in the natural world distinct from themselves according to virology. Their alleged natural form of physical existence and formation before replication is inexplicable by science and any reference to the process of their alleged replication and reproduction remains entirely problematic.
Hi Co. Good to see you! Yes, all of that’s true, and entirely unexplained by “virologists” and their absurd pseudoscience of poisoning cancer cells lines and calling that a vaccine and a virus. Deliberate scientific fraud. A disproven hypothesis.
The irony of an alleged, invisible zombie parasite, feeding off, replicating and silently killing an unaware humanity, bizarrely mirrors the controllers themselves. It’s also a recycled script narrative they’ve previously used with the imaginary, unseen “demiurge” and “archons”. Lol.
R, See my comment above regarding certain toxic adverse effects of certain prescription drugs etc concerning Influenza and Influenza Syndrome. I have been looking for substances other than alleged “viruses” that potentially cause the Flu or what can be interpreted and diagnosed as the Flu.
After all Influenza has been long diagnosed and known as a ‘protean’ disease. In some of the drug categories I’ve mentioned as examples, pneumonia is also listed as a “side-effect” – well, blow me down! I’d never have guessed!
Combined side-effects also paint a great picture for prescription drug lovers if they have an inclination to do their research which is advisable for the sake of their own health and well-being. However, you can lead the horse to the water but you can’t force it to drink.
What say you?
Yes, 100%. Because unnatural substances like drugs cannot be metabolized and excreted safely or easily by the liver. Hence, drugs that aren’t anti-inflammatory trigger the pyrogenic cytokine (IL-6) inducing fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue etc.,
Flu “symptoms” are a poison-inflammation-detox response since we don’t have an “immune” system we have a lymphatic system, endocrine system, CNS, metabolic system etc.
I replace “pathogen”, “bacteria” or “virus” in all the scientific literature, with the word toxin/s or poison, and replace “infection” with poisoning.
He bloody well did. It was on several YouTube vids, if they’re still up. He said ‘the PCR test is for lab use only. It must not be used for diagnosis.’
I had a casual look a few months back. Several of the vids are missing. It would not be a surprise.
One in particular, he was very laid-back, sort of lecturing a group of students.
Video: Dr. Kary B. Mullis. “The Other Nobel Prize”. No Infection or Illness Can be Accurately Diagnosed with the PCR “Test”: https://www.globalresearch.ca/kary-b-mullis-no-infection-illness-can-accurately-diagnosed-pcr/5757224
It is also on Bitchute here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/q5ZR66TyQWDo/
Thanks: this is really important info for sticking it to covidiots and self-important fraudulent ‘fact checkers.’
Not youboob any more then?
The video in the globalresearch link is on youtube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1FXbxDrDrY
Former Lancet editor reported massive fraud among publications of corporate medicine already in 2019 and then in 2021 relating to COVID publication. Professor John Ioannidis from Stanford ran a center specifically dealing with scientific fraud. It was he who based on his researches in Santa Clara county in California correctly determined IFR of that similar to seasonal flu. The regular fraud was compounded in COVID case by collapse of foundation of entire pandemic namely discredited infection diagnostic tool: PCR test. That was compounded by confirmation of strong levels of COVID immunity among those what had cold prior to declaration of pandemic and that included highly immune children. That made a most of COVID epidemiological papers and many that referred and wrongly interpreted such PCR findings under questions, retraction or at least dramatic revision and that included many COVID related papers on medicine, pharmacology, molecular biology and foundations of virology. Without… Read more »
I was really hoping for a link. Do you have one, or does anyone, to benefit the community here? Links are so important and useful. Ta, A2
CFR they found was 0.2% same as flu as you say.
Did IVM or HCQ help those harmed by the jab? Yes or no?
I don’t think that’s even a question that needs an answer. More to the point why there two suppressed when Covid was about. How can it help those who had been jabbed like sheep? It was, in my view, to help recover from covid not the jab itself. But I do hear pine needle tea may help, not a cure but the body is remarkably resilient. I hope you are ok if you were jabbed and experiencing other things beyond it. God bless.
No. Nor did they help a single person previous to being injected with poison.
Those drugs don’t help anyone and never have. HCQ can induce torsades de pointes (arrhythmia) and death. As can azithromycin. Those two drugs together are highly dangerous and toxic. This was commonly known pre 2020.
Ivermectin is poison: Neurological disorders, muscle weakness, seizures are common side effects, even in animals.
Back again to add your poisonous lies, I see. Your statements are utter and complete distortions/falsehoods that not even the FDA or CDC would attempt to pass off to a covid zombie.
There’s no covid, there’s no diagnostic tests for invisible molecules that have never been found. Ergo, no need for highly toxic Rx. Germ theory is a hoax.
I linked to scientific papers that support my claims unlike you, with nothing but ad hominem and vitriol, proving zero knowledge.
Read some books. Here’s a list:
Virus Mania
Goodbye Germ Theory
What Really Makes You Ill
The Contagion Myth
The Invisible Rainbow
Pasteur vs Béchamp
Can You Catch a Cold?
The Lethal Dose
Unless and until you’ve read all of those you’ll be clueless about anything health related.
There’s also Mark Bailey’s paper “A Farewell to Virology” which only comes in at 67 pages so it’s a quicker read (and free to download as a PDF here). Worth a read for anyone who wants an overview of why virology is being called into question by a growing number of people.
For those who are interested, it’s also worth noting that, according to Bailey and a few others, his paper has yet to be refuted.
Thanks for the link. I forgot to include that paper.
And there’s Mike Stone’s viroliegy blog which has well referenced articles on most of the alleged viral “diseases”.
The problem is that none of any of that (much of which I happen to agree with, as it happens) lends veracity to your baseless and senseless accusations against Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. For one, they have nothing to do with whether or not SARS-CoV-2 exists; I also happen to agree that it does not exist. And just as in the case of the film, by your making vile assertions that essentially agree with but go further in their vitriol than the CDC and mainstream media (“horse-paste”) in their attempts to discredit these molecules, you collaborate with Big Pharma and help them do their dirty work. As for ad hominem, I attacked only your statements. Not for the first time have I felt the need to react to what I consider the nihlistic destructiveness of your outpourings here. So there!
Researcher, what is the deal wth this dude Stephen, who thinks he is a saint?
Talk about delusions of grandeur.
He called me a “chat bot with human accomplices” accusing me of an “idiot tone”, when I aked him a question. Yet, claims in a conversation with you that he does not do ad hominem attacks.
Also, what is the deal with his avatar? I thought it was an illustration of a person sitting cross-legged, in half lotus or lotus maybe. I then enlarged it, to discover a photo of a bare-chested dude wearing shades.
WTF….I thought this was OffG, not Grindr LOL
Lol. Poor man’s Russell Brand, controlled opposition Queen type acolyte. Aging badly, and only able to do the most basic yoga pose. Best to ignore. You can’t fix stupid or wilfully ignorant.
Bruce Charlton. Addicted To Distraction
A Mind Going Direct Paradigm 2024 Mind Map Article
https://web.archive.org/web/20230311121027/https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2023/03/11/covid19-bookburning-aids-hiv-mmrautism-no60ghznet-5g-vaxxed-dontdieofignorance-the-reset-to-carbon-currency-end-game-and-a-centralised-command-and-control-corporatism-is-happening-now/
Consider the relationship of Bruce Charlton to Peter Duesenberg.
<The film argues that early treatment options for Covid19 were suppressed in order to boost vaccine profits. It also suggests that Corona virus SARS-2 aka Covid-19 itself may have the been result of gain of function research carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, with funding from Anthony Fauci.> The whole Con-19 $cam was cooked up to increase vaccine profits. By 1990 the word on the street in the vaccine game was “vaccines are too cheap”. So mRNA Vaxx project was launched and the inevitable Covid-19 lab leak and consequent worldwide epidemic of SARS was their opportunity to roll out the RNA Vaxx and have World Governments mandate the Vaxx instead of conventional flu shots, at a vastly inflated price. (Because every smart operator knows that “every crisis is an opportunity”). Your precis above omits the fact that preliminary Gain of Function on Corona viruses was done at U$ Army Bio-Weapons… Read more »
Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey would agree on all fronts.
However, when my husband (in his mid 80s) was diagnosed with pneumonia via a CT scan in late 2021 (God forbid we used the PCR test), he was treated with hydroxychloroquine, zinc and the antibiotic Azithromycin and was better in 6 days.
And all I got was antibiotics (Azithomicin, If I’m not mistaken) and also got better.
What’s the control for your experiment
What I’ve noticed about much of the MAGA cult, and they are far from the only cult we’re faced with (like the Biden cult), is the proud proclamation that “they” resisted Biden’s jabs. When I push back about Mr. Operation Warpspeed, i.e., Trump, and how he still insists that Warpspeed was one of his greatest accomplishments, i.e., because of him, millions of lives were saved by the “wonderful” vaccines, they will invariably say he was “duped, like the rest of us”. And/or that he didn’t mandate them, Biden did. When I push back on that with facts such as – many of us were not duped and knew right away and that if he was so easily duped, why do they want someone as President who is so easily duped into something that big and criminal, and why does he still insist that he saved millions of lives with Operation… Read more »
Trump needs to shut up about his involvement as it does not serve him well.
Loose lips, sink ships.
You are confused. Without a doubt. This isn’t about cults and cultists. This is about globalism and depopulation through the hijacking of the political system through the importation of voters to maintain power to continue pursing the agenda of surrendering our sovereignty to the United Nations via health and climate treaties. Crystal.
Okey Dokey Hemlock, whatever you say.
The Trump supporters are no different than you… You support the delusional old “Career” corrupt Politician who has been corrupt his entire life…. The Uni-Party loves you both… Neither of you has any capacity for open critical thought…. Enjoy the Great Reset…
You’ll OWN NOTHING, and you’ll BE HAPPY…….
I support who? Do you have any idea what you’re talking about there Wil?
It has become very clear since the dust settled on the Plandemic that a large part of the so-called awake element of the public returned to their old tribal habits, be it in national politics or geopoplitics. The alt-media has burgeoned in that time as more media consumers were seeking alternatives to legacy media. Lo and behold our ‘masters’ have followed through on Pike’s mantra with a plethora of alt-media talking heads all promoting a hero or driving a narrative: “Whenever people need a hero we shall supply him” As far as names go both Trump and Putin fit that bill. A lot of alt-media consumers are going to badly deceived and hoodwinked in the coming years by the very alternative media talking heads some of them have come to trust almost reflexively. This will be by a combination of controlled/approved opposition and useful idiots within the alternative space that… Read more »
You wilfully ignore . . .
the parts where Trump says:
A) Covid is a hoax
B) He’s a wartime president fighting an invisible enemy
C) Give me therapeutics every time
D) You have your freedoms
and:
E) the staged booing at the rallies
F) the declaration that “we’re not gonna take it!”
—
https://qalerts.pub/?n=4953
Dec 08, 2020 5:05:50 PM EST
We’re Not Gonna Take It
Actually, I haven’t willfully ignored Trump saying “covid” is a hoax because I never seen anything that indicated/proved he said that. If you can provide me that references, I’d greatly appreciate it. I could certainly provide you a number of references where he’s said his Operation Warpspeed saved millions of lives. Now how could he say that and also say that Covid was a hoax. I believe you are incorrect.
Trump (Feb 28, 2020): It’s the flu, bro. The MAGA people got the message ! @3:50 Now the Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right? Coronavirus. They’re politicizing it. We did one of the great jobs. You say, ‘How’s President Trump doing?’ They go, ‘Oh, not good, not good.’ They have no clue. They don’t have any clue. They can’t even count their votes in Iowa, they can’t even count. No they can’t. They can’t count their votes. One of my people came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia. That didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything, they tried it over and over, they’ve been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning, they lost, it’s all turning. Think of it.… Read more »
Because it’s a war; Warp Speed is a military operation; and everything he says during a war, as a “wartime president”, should be viewed potentially as deception. The MAGA people understand this. They got the message. Hence, the booing pantomime!
https://qalerts.pub/?n=2448
Disinfo is necessary
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-booed-alabama-rally-after-telling-supporters-get-vaccinated-n1277404
Aug. 22, 2021
Trump booed at Alabama rally after telling supporters to get vaccinated
“Those boos are what you created,” says the talking-head retard.
Exactofuckingmente!
Would the real Mike Yeadon please step forward!
i.e. why does he not publish these statements on his own Substack?
Here:
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com
Instead of here:
Supposedly Mike Yeadon – May 4, 2024
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-covid-was-a-scam-conventional
You are so powerful that the psychological war will make you catch whatever you think you got. Keep good thoughts, good diet and good physical fitness with love.
Yeadon got it. Films like this one and articles which push the same message about “alternative treatments” help keep the “Pandemic”/”COVID-19″/”SARS-CoV-2” fraud narrative alive.
I agree 100% with all of Yeadon’s claims and admire his courage. However, I have become interested recently in a “new” school of pathology, which really dates back to the 19th century and earlier, which claims that most diseases are caused by parasites other than bacteria, usually multicellular. One explanation of the apparent effectiveness of HCQ and ivermectin is that they clear out a lot of parasites which gives a temporary relief to symptoms which are ascribed by the “experts” to other causes. Perhaps not coincidentally the the primary original human use for both these drugs was against parasites, malaria and river blindness respectively. However, many advocates of this theory claim that the old folk remedy of turpentine is far more effective, safer, and cheaper than the two drugs mentioned above. I intend to study the evidence more. I do not agree that the demonization by the global cabal against… Read more »
DR. Yeadon is totally correct! There was no virus, all the bullshit about lab leaks was to support this false narrative!!!
But… but… see what Wikipedia says about Michael Yeadon:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Yeadon
If he’s someone so prone to making “false” and “misleading” statements “without evidence”, how did he get such a senior position at Pfizer? What does that say about them? They skip over that part.
I trust Wikipedia totally – I mean, there must be a good reason why it comes up first in every Google search!
What worthy sources do you have that proves Yeadon is a Doctor and is this amazing whistle blower that decided one day that the covid thing was a lie and his life work of working and running/owning medical company’s is a lie…>?
Not all bioweapons are designed to kill immediately, some are designed as incapcitating agents. If you can get them past the immune system barriers, all the more effective.
Dr Kevin McCairn lays out long term issues with the bioweapon:
https://rumble.com/v3w8rjx-savims-toxic-peptides-amyloids-and-prions-from-genetic-vaccines-to-sars-cov.html
All bioweapons, indeed the very concept of “bioweapon,” requires Contagion Theory to be true. 120-plus years of attempts to prove it have failed. See Dr Sam Bailey’s page for ample stuff about this matter.
And see the following page, which has a list of such attempts.
https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence
In the first lock down year there was two predictions in alternation media (controlled opposition) that people would die from the jabs within 6-24 month after the first jab.
Nothing of the like happened.
So we are now on the long term bioweapon theory conspiracy?
I am glad to have watched the film. It is s story of the demonization of HCQ, and good to see the ways in which the various players behaved. A pox on them.
I do not see the film as a criticism of Yeadon’s point that there was no pandemic. I agree with him that there was no new illness. What I am still disgusted by is the reliance on testing that was NOT diagnostic. People were condemned to die after a “positive” test, condemned by inappropriate medical care. I’ll wait for that video.
One of the best arguments, in my opinion, against all the measures into which we were coerced or even the ‘alternatives’ – the drugs – which we were no longer permitted to be treated with is the fact that even The Science has never been able to prove that respiratory illnesses are “catching”.
A new, well-researched book out by Dan Roytas, Can You Catch a Cold? permanently discounts the catching-a-virus theory.
Contagion is a lie, and if the majority of people could only see this, then we can emancipate ourselves from this fraudulent medical prison.
Watch this space for the new release (Amazon has sold out on the book).
https://www.humanley.com
There were two in the bed and the little one said:
“How come I got measles straight after you did?”
Go back to sleep. You’ll still be voting in 10 years for your own enslavement and taking poison meds for non contagious, detox symptoms.
Keep injecting your kids and grandkids with poison. Don’t forget to Saturn-Satan worship at the local church on Sundays where can you act out cannibalism in a fun ritual.
Same shitty diet, for instance?
There were two in bed. One got really sick with a respiratory illness, the other did not. Go figure.
From the CDC website:
“Estimates are not available for the 2020-2021 flu season due to minimal influenza activity.”
Everything about the flu stopped for the 2020-2021 “flu season”. (Last reviewed 2/28/24) Then it became Covid-19. End of story.
Or it could be that the flu just wanted to take a break and let Covid-19 run with it for a few years. Then the flu said, “thanks, Mate”, and decided to come back and join Covid-19. Now they’re all one big happy family. Those darn viruses, I tell ya.
Yes, wonder why the sheeple can’t ask the question…. Almost no cases of “Seasonal Influenza” in 2020-2021…. Wow, could it be that “Covid” was just another PsyOp ????
Kind of like the question, if we put a man on the moon in 1969 with that level of technology, why have we not been back since ??? 55 years later, we struggle to get Rockets into Space ??? Is there a “problem” with asking the question ???
The Sheeple just read what the Corporate Media tell them and let the Fear Porn just wash-over-them…. HaHahaaaa…. Bend-over-Everyone…..
Flue has done a good job for many years and has the right to take a sabbath year.
As others have noticed, this film seems to vent its spleen on the idea that certain treatments were demonised or sidelined when they could have been “more effective” and certainly less harmful. But this sidesteps the whole issue of why such treatments were needed in the first place i.e. the film presupposes that there really was a pandemic. I see no reason for such presupposition.
Most people who want to be “Successful” in their “Industry” ( Docu-Films), will stay somewhere in that “Sweet-Centrist-Chardonnay Liberal/Budweiser-Centrist-Traditional Republican” middle to make the most MONEY…. The Mainstream created the Scamdemic, sold it well, scared-the-shit out of the sheeple public, and here we are….
All the successful on-line Grifters are spinning the best info to grow/maintain their “BRANDS”….
True. It is a psychological war, I think. 🕵 are many. And I mean many. And precisely those that people don’t think so.
Big Pharma Executive Disses Cheap Effective Flu Treatment
What’s new?
I’m with Mike Yeadon on this. I had pneumonia last year with lots of phlegm. Earlier this year (March) I started with a very bad cold with lots of phlegm on the chest which could not easily be removed. By then I had got hold of some Ivermectin (IVERCARE-12). It never made an iota of difference.
My suspicion is that 5G (Birmingham is one of two experimental cities in the UK, Cambridge being the other) and EMF at a certain frequency has been shown to create, among other adverse health issues, influenza-like symptoms.
Ivermectin is a total psyop. Yes, 5g is a weapon and a control grid for tracking and tracing the injected and nasal swabbed. The geo-engineering – arial spraying campaigns and filthy tap water don’t help with the detox symptoms (colds and flus).
Public water utilities don’t remove most chemicals, heavy metals or Rx, and add huge amounts of chlorine to sewer and waste water. And now there’s nano (similar to what’s in the vaccines) in processed foods.
Pulbic water utilities “blow out the pipes” each year ….. “throughout the year, the pipes end up with a layer of nasty, toxic film around the inside of them, so when they are blown out, all the crud gets mixed into the water supply then ultimately pushed into our homes. Even if we only drink purified water we all still use the city water and our skin absorbs the buffet of poisons. This is why a large quantity of the population suddenly gets sick in the fall, but it is mistaken for the Flu Virus”
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/roundup-glyphosate-population-control
Saw that the other day. I’ve been calculating the costs they charge for the water and hydro electricity in Canada and it’s an outrageous amount of profit they are making, on very low overheads.
A city with a population of around 300k is making around 60 million a year on the poisoned water, just for the $50 monthly connection-hookup fee. Before the cost of electricity use and water consumption, another $120 million, so $180 million total absolute minimum for every 100k households. Imagine that kind of money per state or province wide for the millions in every population. Yet providing disgusting, fluoridated, poisoned water, dirty electricity, ugly powerlines everywhere and damaging SMART meters. It’s criminal.
So am I. Basically any information that discusses any aspect of the fake pandemic, but definitely anything that purports to talk about medicine or the shots, reinforces the notion that there really was a pandemic, which, as Dr. Yeadon states, never happened. And, FWIW, we have to know that every bit of information that is “allowed” on youtube has been vetted by TPTB and definitely serves to distract us from what is happening; i.e., theft of all property, wealth transfer, movement to a totalitarian state. If it’s on youtube, it’s propaganda.
You tube allows stuff that they would like to be forbidden but show it in a display of impartiality.
They rely on the other media organs to ridicule the presenters such as Dr Yeadon and, to be fair, it works well for them.
I am against all of this ‘everyone is controlled opposition nonsense’
Do you think you are the only person who ‘right thinks’ ?
Youtube uses a number of algorithms to weed out nearly all of what’s potentially threatening to governments. What’s left behind doesn’t have a wide enough audience or reach to matter. They also shadow ban a huge amount of content and creators, just like META and X.
YouTube is Alphabet-Google owned, a CIA-InQTel-DARPA military intelligence operation, scraping data and constantly nudging its audience.
John – Pneumonia is a disease which can be caused by both bacteria and viruses, so if you had bacterial pneumonia, it’s not surprising that Ivermectin had no effect. See https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pneumonia/symptoms-causes/syc-20354204 for a summary…. Ivermectin has well-known anti-viral properties. Here’s a review of how it affects SARS CoV2 replication in laboratory-grown cells: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-020-0336-z That latter data does not affect whether or not SARS-CoV2 was a laboratory-constructed virus, nor does it affect whether or not a pandemic actually existed at all. It just says that ivermectin has potent activity in inhibiting the replication of a coronavirus under laboratory conditions. The paper also describes the effects of ivermectin in cell cultures on Zika virus and Dengue Fever virus, two other already-used hobgoblins/on the long list of future hobgoblins. In the former case, molecular mechanisms were proposed based on a prevention of uptake of a key protein into the cell nucleus, leading to… Read more »
Good points all. Thank you.
Thanks Rhys, but the pneumonia was before I had any Ivermectin. I got some afterwards. I did have a temperature very close to 40 degrees C. And it was caused through cycling home in a wet shirt I suspect – but the thick-phlegm chest cold was something different. Something I’ve never had before. Difficult to retch anything up. All right now..
Lab conditions are not identical to the complex conditions within the human body Rhys, and that applies to the application of cell cultures and in vivo animal experiments to prove something that applies to human beings. Similarity is not identity and correlation is not causality. You even pointed that out yourself many moons ago that correlation is not causality. At best microbiology is conjectural it is not a so-called “exact science” according to Lacan.
The flu injections themselves can cause pneumonia and a bad case on bronchitis.
Dont tell them. We the people love placebo as the real thing. Faith can move mountains and a make a guy without legs walk again.
Denis Rancourt needs to be mentioned as one of the first to point out the flaws in the new virus theory.
And Pierre Chaillot in France, who recognises his debt to Rancourt and has demonstrated that the official death figures showed nothing of note in 2020.
Denis Rancourt wrote the last chapter in “mRNA Vaccine Toxicity” (D4CE.org) called AIDS and HIV: the Blueprint for the Perversion and Subversion of Medical Science. On page 183 there is a brilliant graphic showing the increase in incidence of AIDS (in Africa) and concomitant decrease in Syphilis between the years 1990 and 2006.
This is the same as the increase in so-called SARS-CoV-2 and the non-incidence of influenza when the so-called pandemic was at its height.