WATCH: Identifying State Crimes Against Democracy in Real Time

Your persona, CJ, and all the other proponents of false authority that propagate this site filling the comments below or above the fold with obvious lies, are reprehensible, immoral and dishonest.

If that offends you, then sit with that discomfort.

Lies and propaganda are an affront to the intellect of all the readers here, whether they realize it or not.

I make all my claims or statements using logic, reason and deduction.

The hypocrisy of authors or commenters here pointing out immoral behavior of others, but never taking personal responsibility for their obvious collusion and participation, borders on the absurd.

The authors and “commenters” or “personas” not only allow or condone the immoral, criminal and violent acts of governments to continue unabated, but seek to actively distract from the real issues the inhabitants of the world face, by continuing to propagate lies, hoaxes and the psychological warfare of the authorities, who specialize in social engineering through repetition of lies, mass mind control and disinformation.

I made very clear in my original comment on that other COURT APPEARANCE thread, I was skeptical than anyone who is an author here, who also doesn’t acknowledge the hoaxes and scams, and also believes elections are real, or other obvious scams like “Wikileaks”, is not genuine.

I do not believe that they are merely brainwashed, spellbound ignorant dupes. They have access to the same information we all do, exposing the methods and means for the present and past tyranny.

Regardless, as either (dupe or shill) they are indirectly or directly, wittingly or unwittingly working for and assisting the criminal authorities you call governments.

That goes for all authors anywhere throughout history who never question nor bring up the Hegelian Dialect, nor do they question the immorality and unlawfulness of false authority and criminal governments. These “governments” are all obviously centrally controlled and privately owned.

Govern = Control. Ment = Mind.

Government is Mind Control.

Never once in the history of any so called government have they ever represented the will or welfare of people. Nor have they ever been democracies. The ability to vote does not equal democracy.

Consequently. I see most of the authors in the alt media sphere as envoys of the false authorities: Controlled opposition.

I don’t have to respond to you in a manner you deem appropriate.

Rather, you were extremely rude implying first I need to “behave” castigating me, then implying I am delusional if I have a different take on the psychological operation or psychological warfare that took place with CJ Hopkins (whether he is witting or unwitting) or if I dare disagree with the conclusions or opinions of what I consider to be controlled opposition authors at OG who appear perpetually duped by obvious hoaxes. That perpetual blindness calls into question their words, actions and behavior.

If that conclusion offends your delicate sensibilities, I don’t care.

If someone is NOT rude, NOT using straw men or false equivalencies, NOT misrepresenting my statements, NOT ignoring salient points, NOT attacking my character or intentions, NOT using ad hominem, or NOT gaslighting me, I will respond politely.

If not, then I will respond to them as a mirror of their own behavior. For every action there is also a corresponding reaction. It’s a universal law. It’s also why we have tyranny instead of freedom.

I do not exist as anyone’s teacher, educator or mentor.

It’s not up to me to provide proof for my opinions and nobody else here is subject to that kind of scrutiny. Just the very few who challenge the consensus. Meaning, just because my views or opinions don’t COMFORM TO YOURS, I don’t owe you or anybody else a damn thing or even an explanation.

The authors and commenters here who never (tacit omissions) examine the immorality and unlawfulness of government or authority, are the main problem we face as a “society”.

The founders here at OG, I don’t take any issue with them whatsoever. I find their words and opinions insightful. I don’t have a problem or criticism of OG. They provide an uncensored platform and allow criticism and critique of their authors in the comment section so I applaud them for that and don’t speak to their intent.

I can only take each author (many of whom are obvious Masons and former journalists) and their words at face value, on an individual basis and objectively evaluate the kind of propaganda they are pushing, as I did in my original comment on the COURT APPEARANCE thread.

There are many readers here who are aware of the level of hoaxes and psychological operations that occur everywhere, all the time, and that includes “so called” alt media.

You attempting to imply equivalence with an analogy that has literally nothing to do with my critique is dishonest.

My critique is based on simple logic; that if an author or COMMENT PERSONA is unable to discern between hoaxes, psychological operations, psychological warfare, other types of propaganda like pushing faux economic binaries, and yet ALWAYS ignoring objective morality and the truth, then they can only be either untrustworthy or duped.

Either way, their opinions are largely irrelevant to me, as I don’t take them seriously as someone to debate, I don’t believe I can change their mind, and I don’t see them as an ally in searching for truth, or providing viable solutions to the worldwide tyranny humanity has faced for millennia.

Since your comments and responses here support controlled opposition gaslighting, hoaxes, psychological warfare and faux binaries, I have to assume you too, are an Order Out of Chaos cult member or a completely, brainwashed, mind controlled individual incapable of repeating anything but the lies of their worshipful masters, or controlled opposition faux heroes.

Frankly, I don’t care which type you are. My money is on the former. You always circle the wagons around your faux heroes, who you also fawn over as if they are some great intellect or cultural icon.

Your nescience, or willing ignorance is the kind of banality of evil that Arendt referred to in her writings on the worldwide coordinated military operation of WWII that included hoaxes, mass murder and terrorism all planned for and coordinated by all the “governments” and military in each country against their own populations.

Consequently, I find anyone who knowingly and actively discourages absolute truth and freedom for humanity, to be disingenuous, untrustworthy, rude, gaslighting, venal, sociopathic and as immoral as the faux authorities who commit democide on a daily basis.

Is that clear enough for you, Roger?