Fake Wars & Higher Prices: What a “Multipolar World Order” REALLY Means
Kit Knightly
The world is changing. The once dominant imperial power of the United States is faltering, hollowed out by corruption, over-extended by hubris, eaten away by the cancers of hatred, nationalism and greed.
Even according to its own propaganda outlets, America has “become the villain”, is “Officially an Empire in Decline”, and we are witnessing its “final act”.
And, as we await the titan’s inevitable fall, the world is considering the future. Everyone is talking about the “multipolar world order” just over the horizon.
From “Pax Americana to Pax Multipolaris”.
This “Multipolar World” has been a political talking point for a long time, but it has been building momentum over the last few years, and noticeably accelerating since the beginning of Donald Trump’s second term.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has been calling for this multipolar order for years, and did so again last week. China’s Xi Jinping regularly does the same, most recently during his trip to South America in February. North Korea’s Kim Jung Il echoed these sentiments in April.
Xi and Putin signed a joint declaration on “building a multipolar world” this morning.
Two weeks ago, in a talk at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz called for “a post-imperial world [and] a resilient rules-based order in a new era of multipolarity”.
In a speech during his trip to China last month, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for “embracing a multipolar world order”:
“What is happening today is not a transfer of hegemony, but an increase in multipolarity — in both power and prosperity,”
Outside of politicians speechifying, the multipolar world order has become the main focus of the international think-tank circuit as well.
“Multipolarization” was the main topic of the Munich Security Conference Report in February 2025.
In December, the Tony Blair Institute partnered with the JPMorgan Chase International Council to publish a report called “World Rewired: Navigating a Multi-Speed, Multipolar Order”, which concludes in the foreword (written by Blair himself and Jamie Dimon of JPMC):
The world still offers enormous potential for those willing to engage constructively—to build coalitions, invest in innovation, and help shape the rules of the next era rather than simply react to them.
And then in March, the World Economic Forum published an (exceedingly dull) report titled “The Future of Materials Systems: Cooperation Opportunities in a Multipolar World”, which uses sentences like this…
In a multipolar world, agile interest-based cooperation will be decisive in shaping resilient, productive and sustainable materials systems.
That’s the traditional circle in which “multipolarity” is most discussed. Reports for alphabet agencies and non-profits, market predictions and risk assessments. Academic language that camouflages meaning in layers of surplus verbiage.
But multipolarity is not just the pet subject of presidents and thinktanks, it is a regular talking point across the media landscape.
America Can’t Escape the Multipolar Order
…said Council on Foreign Relations publication Foreign Affairs, in December.
The European Times headlines “From unipolarity to multipolar reality – A new world order is fast emerging”, and is rather more measured:
Multipolarity itself is neither inherently dangerous nor inherently beneficial. Its ultimate impact will depend on how nations choose to exercise power, uphold international law, and cooperate in addressing common challenges.
In an interview with Politico titled “What the next world order looks like”, British author Rana Dasgupta says:
If we’re entering a multipolar world, that’s not very unusual. That’s the normal state of the world.
As you can see, the potential fall of our modern Rome isn’t terrifying to many of those who owe their money and position to that Empire, rather it is energizing or maybe “the normal state of the world”.
The US/Israeli war with Iran has been blamed for and/or credited with accelerating this long-awaited Imperial decline.
Two weeks ago, The Tehran Times headlines:
How the Iran conflict is catalyzing a multipolar world order
A report from The Middle East Council on Global Affairs frames the war in Iran as the US trying to stop the multipolar world from breaking free:
What is unfolding in Iran is not simply a war over the regional balance of power or nuclear containment. It is an attempt to rupture the geographic core of an emerging multipolar order designed to bypass Western dominance
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace published this…
The Iran War Shows the Limits of U.S. Power – If Washington cannot adapt to the ongoing transformations of a multipolar world, its superiority will become a liability.
In many parts of the independent media there is an almost feverish anticipation.
America’s Empire will fall, and a shiny multipolar new world order will rise in its place, and it’s definitely going to be A Good Thing.
That’s the story.
But that’s all it is, a story.
What is the “multipolar world order”, really?
What multipolarity really means
The cultivated image of a multipolar world – minus the quotes – is that of global cooperation between free-and-equal sovereign nations, each pursuing the interests of their people without living under the cloud of Imperial hegemony.
“Equal and orderly […] inclusive, universally beneficial economic globalisation”, as Xi Jinping said in a February speech.
This was echoed, in greater depth, by Professor Wang Yiwei, who wrote a briefing titled “The Chinese Philosophy of an Equal and Orderly Multipolar World Order”, and describing how different the world would be under Chinese leadership – or rather, non-leadership:
China advocates an equal and orderly multipolar world and inclusive economic globalization. Among these, the core of an equal and orderly multipolar world is to adhere to the equality of all countries, big and small, oppose hegemonism and power politics, and effectively promote the democratization of international relations.
A less utopian view predicts a multipolar world districted into blocs or spheres of influence, but still more dynamic and potentially fair for being out of the Empire’s shadow. That was the original meaning of the phrase when it was first floated in the late 90s.
But neither of these reflect the looming reality, or the true intentions of the powerful people feeding the word to their talking heads.
That might be multipolarity, but it’s not “multipolarity”.
It’s amazing the difference a pair of quotation marks can make, isn’t it?
The powers-that-shouldn’t-be and their soulless meat puppets in the corporate, academic and political spheres have created an entirely euphemistic linguistic phraseology defined by the need for quotation marks.
Words and phrases that don’t mean what they pretend to mean.
“Climate change”, “hate speech”, “public health”.
“Terrorism”, “misinformation” and “sustainability”.
In our political landscape, these have ceased to be words with meanings and become both camouflage and conditioning.
A dishonest cross-breed of programming language and hypnotic suggestion; phrases designed to obfuscate reality on the one hand, and either mechanically call pre-programmed responses or elicit powerful conditioned emotional reactions on the other.
“Multipolarity” is one of those words. And it should always be put in quotes.
The truth behind the word is simple: A global franchise for an old system of control.
Party Politics Goes Global
Defenders of the “multipolar world order” narrative will often argue along the lines “surely a multipolar world is better than US Imperialism? Shouldn’t we welcome resistance to hegemony?”
That same argument has been deployed by climate change supporters, who claim “even if the climate isn’t changing, protecting the environment is still a good thing, isn’t it?”
The flaw in this argument is a failure to question the underlying assumptions and official definitions of these phrases.
Just because something adopts a nice-sounding name doesn’t mean that thing is nice.
Labour don’t support workers. The Democrats hate democracy.
State-backed corporate “environmentalism” is not about planting trees or saving animals, and globalist-backed corporate “multipolarity” is nothing to do with increasing national sovereignty or offering independence from a global authority.
The reality of a “multipolar world” will be a system of intertwining corporate and state institutions implementing authoritarian, anti-human policies and disguising an ideologically monolithic power structure behind an illusory veneer of “choice”.
We in the collective West are more than familiar with this model – it is the way our “democracies” function.
Two major teams, with near identical ideologies and taking orders from the same unelected powers, fiercely battling it out over the tiniest sliver of uncommon ground.
They pitch electoral battles over differences of iconography, phraseology or fractions of percentage points to distract from the fact they agree about everything that really matters, have no real power at all, and are at best replaceable widgets in a vast influence machine.
The point of these battles is to convince people that democracy exists, that they have a choice, and can affect change.
This lie works, and has done for decades.
“Mutlipolarity” is an expansion of that model – the control mechanism of fake binary left-right, red-blue, Coke-Pepsi partisan politics rolling out world-wide.
It’s the same exact method employed to the same exact end: Tribalism as a path to cognitive dissonance, thought termination and the death of objectivity.
Why This? Why now?
It’s worth remembering this faux-antagonistic version of “multipolarity” was not part of the long term plan.
It was obvious, almost from the very start, that the Covid “pandemic” was intended to be a great global unifying moment.
We were all supposed to realise how silly these disagreements across ethnic, national or religious lines were, and come together to beat back the common enemy. A threat to the world that united the world, like in Independence Day.
We were meant to be using digital currency under a globally implemented social credit system by now. Owning nothing and being happy.
But it didn’t work.
The moment they attempted to remove the horizontal divisions created to control society, they only drew attention to the much greater vertical divisions. People suddenly became more aware of the centralized, unified nature of global power structures.
The grand plan to get Global Government through the gates inside the Covid trojan horse not only failed, but backfired spectacularly.
There was a need for a re-adjustment. A new approach.
International unity didn’t work and doesn’t sell, but an international binary might.
That’s the “multipolar world order”.
The Momentum of Real Division
None of this is to deny the existence of real divisions, or whitewash historic crimes. Obviously there are deeply felt, and entirely justified, anti-Imperial sentiments across the developing world, and within the dissenting circles of the developed world.
The USA has been an Imperial power for the best part of two centuries, and a global hegemon for almost forty years, and in that time it has carried out monstrous acts of colonial aggression, and destroyed millions of lives. We have covered many of them.
In pursuit of oil and gold they cut a bloody swathe across the Middle East, and churned South and Central America into political chaos over and over again.
Israel likewise – whether you consider them the power behind the US throne, or Washington’s catspaw in the Middle East – is a brutal apartheid state, that has torn up and spat out international law a thousand times over.
These are all true facts, and the multipolar narrative finds utility in them.
Just as domestic party politics parlays very real economic issues into shallow class-based resentments, or understandable concerns over uncontrolled immigration into reactionary xenophobia – so too does the “multipolar world” narrative prey on historical trauma and the desire for vengeance to embed partisan thought that erodes critical thinking.
The narrative harnesses the momentum of historical hatred to push itself forward.
Indeed, as I have previously said in interviews, the enthusiasm for this new model from the political classes in Russia, China et al. is entirely understandable. It is far better, from their point of view, to have a seat at the globalist table than be living with Uncle Sam’s nuclear gun at their temple.
It’s possible many of the people involved truly believe that a fake “multipolar world order” really does prevent a nuclear war, and is for the best.
Ironically, in their minds, “war” really does mean peace.
The Role of War
War is vital to the development of this multipolar model, in two main ways:
- It disguises, discredits and/or distracts from, the revelation of globalist cooperation highlighted by the Pandemic.
- It furthers, by other means, the “great reset” agenda.
It has other supplementary functions as well.
If “Multipolarity” is the global franchise of fake democracy, then war can be seen as a replacement for the ballot box.. We don’t have global elections (yet); so their role in the system is assumed by geopolitical struggles; trade deals or staged/limited “wars”.
Global unity government was and is a very unpopular idea, so its creeping implementation has to be disguised. Nothing disguises unity of purpose so well as armed conflict.
The sheer number of people who repeat some variant of the argument “how can they be on the same side, they’re shooting at each other!” is testament to the effectiveness of this strategy.
Nothing brings a populous together so well as a perceived external threat. History is replete with rulers who, faced with discontent at home, started a war to garner support. A state of being at war tends to unite people behind the government.
It’s the natural extension of this known tactic that two governments would agree to go to war in order to mutually benefit from this group-think dynamic.
This is international geo-political game theory, as explained in A Beautiful Mind. They both win if they agree not to truly compete.
Both sides have corrupt political classes, both sides have arms manufacturers keen to profit from chaos, both sides crave “emergency war-time powers” to crack down on domestic dissent.
So, we can see how the “war” individually benefits the rulers of each side in the short term. But, more importantly, the supra-national powers have a larger, longer-term agenda (see below) that is also served by the war.
War drives up prices, consumes resources, lowers the standard of living, justifies shortages and manufacturers scarcity.
These factors combine to a make a state of being – or appearing to be – at war vital to the planned breakdown and reconstruction of society.
This is not a new idea, the state has used the framing of war, or at least the threat of war, to boost national unity and increase state powers for centuries.
The new twist is that these “wars” are not real, they are – to one extent or another – staged.
all the wars a stage
We are living in the age of the unreal – The Perfidious Unreality of the New Normal – as we discussed with all those quotation marks.
We regularly live through “terrorism” that is no such thing, we hold “elections” where the voting is irrelevant, and we just had a worldwide “pandemic” without a disease.
It is only natural that warfare should be folded into a propaganda control system that increasingly relies on simply making stuff up.
Just as Western domestic “democracies” need “elections” to maintain the illusion of the system, so too does a “multipolar world” need “wars” to create the appearance of conflict.
These wars are not real.
Or perhaps “real” is not the best word to use – if you want we could say these wars are not honest, not true, not sincere.
But what does staged war mean?
Does it mean no bombs are being dropped or people killed?
No, as we have said many times: Be it in Ukraine or Gaza or Iran, there likely is death and destruction taking place – but that does not necessarily mean war.
As Catte says in her 2024 article:
Death isn’t the definition of war. Conflict is the definition of war.
Do a few air strikes or a thousand dead civilians mean the US and Iran are really enemies locked in an ideological struggle for survival? No. Of course not.
We know these governments and agencies do not care about their own people, let alone each other’s.
People were disposable when they were being nailed inside their houses, given illegal DNR orders or injected with toxic Pfizer goo, and they’re just as disposable when they’re being blown up.
It’s like a psychopathic, murderous sport. The players are real – maybe they’re playing to win or maybe paid to lose – but it doesn’t really matter, since the struggle is controlled by a league which sets the terms.
Numbers, times, places, rules and limitations are all agreed on beforehand.
And, just like sport, the fans cheering hate each other far more than the players playing do, everyone gets paid no matter who wins, and the whole thing is owned by a handful of billionaires who all go to the same parties.
What would a staged war look like?
Well, that’s a more complicated question.
The simple answer is “coordination”. Any kind of coordination – especially of scale or scope – means we can infer a certain amount of fakeness. After all, if the two sides can agree to have a limited war, they can agree not have a war at all.
There are a few more specific signs to look out for.
For example, both sides calling ahead to tell each other where they plan to bomb (or not bomb), so that people can be evacuated accordingly.
Or one army making it to the enemy capital inside a month, then turning around and leaving again for unknown reasons.
Or maybe pausing hostilities to carry out a polio vaccination drive.
Or perhaps vague or ever-changing victory conditions.
Or a pattern of airstrikes hitting empty or condemned buildings in such a way that aligns with pre-existing renovation plans.
Or repeated self-defeating or self-sabotaging behavior that seems to artificially halt progress or extend the conflict.
Or sudden, contradictory developments in the narrative that don’t logically follow.
Or apparent collaboration from combatants on strategies that further a globalist agenda.
…that kind of thing.
This is the logical extension of pre-existing modus operandi. The inevitable intersection of the war-for-profit model that is centuries old, and the age of simulacra described by Baudrillard in the 1980s.
What is the benefit of staged war?
The benefit of a staged war vs a real war is much the same as a fake pandemic vs a real pandemic – control.
A coordinated “war” can last as long as it needs to, pause or resume on command, kill as few or as many as necessary, and can’t ever accidentally result in nuclear annihilation.
George Orwell described it almost perfectly eighty years ago. Super-continents locked in eternal, and maybe even fictional, conflict. Warfare becoming “a purely internal affair”, not meant to be won but meant to be continuous.
An endless game and permanent chaos is how they win.
That’s our state of play, grumbling wars with vague victory conditions that neither army ever loses but both sides constantly claim to be winning.
Meanwhile, the price of energy is only going up, we’re being warned of fertilizer crises and food shortages and higher taxes.
Different Paths, Same Destination
Just as in domestic party politics, vociferous or violent disagreements between the parties belie a shared agenda pushed by the power that controls both sides of every apparent divide.
Even as their mutually-beneficial “wars” play out, reports and think-tanks talk up the need for “limited cooperation” or “regional multilateral projects”.
As they bash their soldiers together on one side of the world, they share technology, cooperate on environmental issues or buy gas and oil from each other.
And agree on major policy documents.
The whole world (minus the US, currently) has signed the Pandemic Treaty, or signed up to the United Nations “Pact for the Future”.
The BRICS nations all have globalist ties – recall BRICs was a term coined in a Goldman Sachs report in 2001 – and they all signed the Kazan Declaration in 2024. Supporting, among other things, the IMF, the WHO, Agenda 2030 and “sustainable development goals”. (Read Riley Waggaman’s great break down here)
The Kyoto Protocols, the Paris Climate Agreements, the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals are all backed by every one of our multiple poles.
Everyone on any of the supposed sides believes in the same things and shills the same foundational globalist lies such as climate change and Covid.
And, quirks of implementation or nomenclature aside, they all want the same things and push the same familiar shopping list of policies:
- Programmable Digital currency
- biometric Digital ID
- ending online anonymity
- Cashless society
- Censorship
- “Sustainable development goals”
The unspoken endgame of this collective horror show is easy to summarize: Techno-authoritarianism.
Hrvoje Moric has written about how multipolarity, as a model, is a form of global government.
A dystopian society where the state and mega corporations merge into a Thing-like monstrosity that has constant, real-time access to any and all data for pretty much everyone on the planet. That has the ability and facility to monitor – or control – every transaction, every journey, every message or phone call.
“Multipolarity” disguises this truth, and uses partisan thinking and ideology to draw fake or surface-level distinctions.
BRICS vs NATO, the US vs China, Israel vs Iran, Europe vs Russia, Belt and Road Initiative vs the India-Middle East-Europe Trade Corridor.
Pick a flag and wave it. Fake Wars & Higher Prices, all in the service of The Great Reset.
That is its purpose, and that is what “multipolarity” really means.
Thanks for reading...
You can help us keep doing what we do. Every little helps and is hugely appreciated.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
303 Comments. Wow. Biggest response i’ve seen for an article here in so little time.
Bringing game theory and Baudrillard and a whole boiler maker of theories and perceptions to convince the reader that elites are colluding together their war/conflicts in order to shuttle a volunteering humanity into global totalitarianism, is off base, over-intellectualizing and unproductive.
The US asserted role of world emperor after WW2 because it could while everyone else was destroyed and rebuilding. It has spent it’s prime energy since keeping that world order, with US elites wealth and authority on top. No one else has military bases in another country, except the old colonials, much less in 128 countries like the US. The US does not bargain wars with anyone. It has indulged a financial, spy and military automaton that operates out of self-interest. On a full digital tech planet that became instantaneous, with peak population refugeeing from dysfuntional Western neocolonialist exploitation, this war/conflict automaton is obviously obsolete to any non-elite. But they just keep on, keepin’ on.
The elite, the PTB, the 1% or whatever we want to call the world “leader” class, are incompetent to human evolution and no matter what country they’re in, are the problem. The concept of having an “elite” rule is THE problem. Trying to convince us everything is staged, FAKE, phoney, while in many ways already known to be true, is a paralyzing disservice to the matter at hand. How do we disempower elites from continuing to dictate our lives into a flywheeling catastrophe?
Imagine the US withdrew all it’s foreign military bases, disbanded the CIA, cauterized State Department provocateurism, ended weapons export industry, quit sanctioning/threatening the world with economic obedience, and diverted $1.5T war machine and $1.5T Interest on the [war machine] Debt ($3T/yr) into a services oriented Public Commons. Would any other country be prosecuting war for empire? No. Would they retreat to building internal economic self-sufficiency with neighboring countries after 600 yr. lessons of US/Western Godzilla empires? Yes.
Yes the wars are fake and multipolarity is a scam to get the middle classes on board with a prison planet by selling it as a new age of equality. A large part of former dissident media has been coopted to promote this narrative.
I have been warning about this anywhere I can for a couple years now. I guess the word is spreading slowly, but you are all running out of time to get aware and resist.
Things went international some decades ago and thinking in terms of national dominance is mainly important to the corporate and financial powers for military backing to protect the various international business and trade interests around the globe. That is more of the nature of the top-down beast running things, and their thinking in terms of the alleged unipolar-multipolar conflict of nations. It is said that if you know someone’s interests you can predict their actions, which is not wholly true for most of us erratic creatures, but it seems to hold in matters of geopolitics. Nations, even huge ones such as the US and China, are merely chattels of the international ownership class which has become quite blatant of late in carving up and looting nations to feed their voracious appetites and plans.
With a BRI silk road already pushed through from China to Iran, and with the Levant (Grater Israel) likely to become the largest trade hub on the globe, it is easy to say the conflict with Iran is most likely a very contrived affair, much like the war in the Ukraine. If Simon Dixon was right in saying when the conflict with Iran began earlier this year that regime change in Iran had already been arrange, then it fits that that war from the point of view of the ownership class is one more fake war. I am a firm believer that you cannot do geopolitics without taking into consideration the plans and interests of the ownership class calling all of the major shots. The war in the Ukraine, despite the slaughter, is also for the same reasons a very contrived affair. In the march of the Western militaries through the ME and North Africa, in each case Russia was allied with those nations on the chopping block, and on cue it abandoned those nations just like it did with Syria in late 2024. Russian corporate interests simply get a huge hunk of the Ukraine while Western corporate interests such as BlackRock are already gobbling up the rich assets in the west of the Ukraine. The conflict with Iran, at least to me, appears to be more of a pretext or cover, for expansion of Israel north towards the Euphrates not just for an expanded homeland for the too-few Jews but mainly to control the turf to dominate the planned huge trade hub. The development plans go far beyond the plans for high-end hotels and casinos in Gaza. Coincidentally, the Ukraine will also be a very rich and powerful trade hub with a northern silk road route through it, and also with oil and other goods from the ME hub up the Black Sea to Odessa. Israel, we must remember, is mainly just one more asset owned by the largest financial empire on the globe – which knows no borders, just like the money, assets and governments they control.
Thank you for seeing through the veil of BS, most people don’t. Fyi – a lot of the “slaughter” is fake too, they boost the numbers to cover how limited and token the “wars” really are.
They’re mostly just local exercises with live ammo, blowing up deserted buildings, sending scouting drones for the “other side” to shoot down and get press coverage about, “disabling” energy infrastructure to provide a narrative for pre-planned price gouging – that type of thing.
You don’t get mass casualties like that so they spike the numbers and sometimes get real stupid with them. Like the supposed numbers of dead in Ukraine are just insane. You would need a full scale WW1 situation to get those numbers, which obviously is not happening.
The “war cemeteries” are mostly fake too. Try to find any of the literal millions of angry grieving families there should be if these numbers were true. Barely any can be located, and most of the few that get featured onTV are actors paid to cry but not ask difficult questions.
Multipolar Zone 1: USA $$ being the reserve currency in north, central, south americas and most of europe and mid east.
Multipolar Zone 2: Asia (Russia, China), south Asia (India) and Africa for any alternate reserve currency. That’s a lot of people but less GDP to work with.
To be viable any Zone 2 reserve currency must be backed by something the governments can’t debase. A barter token between countries based on physical resources (gold, silver, oil, etc) could work.
I doubt the Yuan will be it. It has the same inflation problem other currencies have if not worse.
Interesting; I’m not really knowledgeable about currencies, except I’m convinced that if a currency came into being w/o being encumbered w interest, we wdn’t have such megabillionaires. As Jeff Booth points out– w improved technology, our currency ought always to have bought more w time, not less. I.e., it’s natural for currencies to deflate, not inflate.
Hi: I wrote the following about a month ago on this very subject of deflation:
___
If there is no dilution in the purchasing power of the unit-currency / Canadian dollar, then why do Small Claims Courts keep increasing their limits? When I first became aware of it, the limit was $10,000, but when last I checked some years ago it had been increased to $25,000 while the official inflation rate (a ludicrous notion regardless) from Statistics Canada was less than 2% per annum over the same period.
If the Government of Canada or Statistics Canada were on trial in criminal law jurisdiction for criminal waste of resources, then that would qualify as prima facie evidence of mens rea / guilty mind.
Pro forma conference call:
Newly-appointed Governor of Bank of Canada (GoBoC): Good morning to both of you at Stats-Can and CRA (Canada Revenue Agency) respectively. I have requested this call to ascertain whether either of you can provide me with any guidance on what to expect in regards to the upcoming quarterly inflation rate figures.
Stats-Can: I assume that you haven’t been briefed yet, sir, but the way it works is that you have to tell us the rate that you want, and then we choose the items to include that will produce that result.
GoBoC: But what about the actual rate of inflation? The one you determine from your data collection activities?
CRA: Well there isn’t any – that’s the point. Assume, for example, that the question is to determine the rate of inflation in Canada for the 32 years between 1985 and 2017. If you pick an actual real-capital-asset that is literally the same thing, like a specific 39-suite residential apartment building and lot sold in Victoria, B.C., in 1985 for $885,000, and then again in 2017 for $8.5 million, then the corresponding apparent rate of inflation was 7.5% per annum for 32 years, and the exchange value in the Canadian dollar has prima facie declined by 90% over the same 32 years. That is as close as can be estimated because it is a measurement made against the same thing and not a different thing.
But if instead you choose the price of data-storage capacity per megabyte, then a 60-megabyte HDD that was priced at $3,000 in 1985 and a 128 gigabyte (128,000 megabyte) SSD for $70 in 2017, results in – not an inflation rate – but a deflation rate that corresponds to an increase in the exchange-value of the Canadian dollar of about 12 million percent (12,000,000%) over 32 years.
And if you choose the price of Bitcoin, then a single coin obtained for $0.01 very shortly after its introduction in 2009, was $100,000 at some point in 2025, and the exchange-value of the Canadian dollar will appear, or can be made to appear, to have declined by 99.9999% over the sixteen year period.
The logical impasse is that if it were possible to include everything that is sold in the economy, then the result will always reveal an ongoing deflation in aggregate price-to-value because of technology.
For example, the same capacity data-farm needed to keep a multi-gigabyte file on every Canadian that would cost $100 billion today, would have cost about $1 quadrillion ($1,000,000,000,000,000) in 1985 (if it were even possible to produce at such scale in 1985). And the more nominal money the government puts into it, the lower the apparent rate of inflation, notwithstanding that the rate of private creation of unfunded liabilities is going through the roof. Get it?
HEZBOLLAH IDF WAR IN LEBANON
While Israel has killed 900 civilians in Gaza since the latest Gaza ceasefire, the Israeli IDF is losing in Lebanon with loss of military leaders and tanks.
Fully 1/3 of Israelis are failing to appear when called up for military service; 70,000 have left the country. Nevertheless an add’l 30,000 Israeli troops have entered Lebanon.
Israelis are threatening to flood major areas of Lebanon by destroying an important dam.
Jonathan Pollard: “We have to finish the Gaza and Iran wars in order to be prepared for the next war– which will be against Turkey and Egypt.”
[delusions of grandeur]
FALSE FLAG? Russian Drone Strikes Romanian Apt Complex.
Ukrainians wd have to have a few Russian drones– captured, etc.
Lots of pressure on Putin to strike EU or UK factories making drones for Ukraine, but highly unlikely they’d target a residential bldg. The location in Romania is close to the Ukrainian border.
The ruskies ain’t stupid LOL. They’re sneaky shits but not stupid. They’ll just create accidents like I swear they did already in Bulgaria (or was it Romania?). Things just blow up sometimes and nobody claims it LOL.
Thank you for an interesting point of view on the coming multipolar world.
It would seem to me that many of your arguments against a multipolar arrangement could be applied equally to the US government.
Anyway for now, the predictions of what a multipolar world would look like, are only that – predictions. It remains to be seen how such a multipolar world develops. Perhaps not all the world’s governments are against their own people? And perhaps in a multipolar arrangement, they find more freedom to implement popular policies?
But the main thing that I notice is that much of your argumentation is not really directed against a multipolar world. You seem to be making the point that with the current form of governments, we can never be sure that the government will work for us, rather than for a clique of billionaires and their multinational businesses.
Assuming that this is really the more basic point you’re making, what would be the solution we – as in we the normal people – could work towards. I am almost to the point of saying we need to find a different form of government that IS responding to our needs and wishes. It’s a tall order, for sure, but we might as well start to think about that.
In a multipolar world…
The multipolar world is the dream of the old dying empire, they hope to retain a share of what they had. The British empire had that desire too but at the Brenton Woods conference they were told their empire and their currency would play no part in the new world order.
At the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference, US Treasury official Harry Dexter White and British economist John Maynard Keynes clashed over the postwar global monetary system. White, backed by America’s massive gold reserves, successfully pushed for a US dollar-centric system pegged to gold, which ultimately marginalized the UK’s financial power.
The US will most likely be marginalized to the American continent, Canada, Mexico and S-America. The BRICS taking the rest of the world and Western Europe sinking into a meaningless quagmire or warring factions as it always does.
Reason2Resist with Dimitri Lascaris is a good news source.
The international flotilla to Gaza tries to deliver food to Gaza, to the survivors of Israel’s genocide, who have lost everything. The volunteers aboard the flotilla were abused, then abducted for further abuse. Eventually they were released. This video shows the following:
Dimitri speaks to two participants in the most recent wave of the flotilla to Gaza. Their names are Mathilda Mallet and Ehab Lotayef.
Mathilda is a citizen of France who was shot by an Israeli soldier while in captivity. Ehab is a Canadian citizen who was stabbed and beaten by Israeli soldiers while in captivity.
Both of them talk to Dimitri about the horrors they experienced and witnessed. Ehab and Dimitri also discuss the complicity of the Canadian government of Mark Carney.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IBLtJ8jLas @19
No thanks Fraulein, no anti-jewish propaganda . I remember the murder and rape by the palestinians at the peaceful jewish rave festival. The palestinians are the abhorrent genocidal criminals, not the jews. The jews let them live there peacefully, it’s not the jews fault they spent all their resources digging tunnels and stockpiling arms. Gaza was and is a military base for the other Arab states and Greta Thunberg is a two-faced glory seeker more interested in her social media profile than any cause she claims to back lol.
I’m not in the least anti-Jewish. All my New York friends are Jewish, and there is a strong thread of intellectuality in the Jewish culture that I very much enjoy. And it seems all the wonderful show music is composed by Jews.
Israel violates the normal Jewish understanding of religion. Israel’s new chief rabbi has stated that rape is all right in wartime. I know I won’t persuade you, but if you could look objectively at the zionist program– to steal the land of several countries and to kill as many as possible to out-populate them– you wd be forced to concede that zionism is evil.
You may not hide behind the slander that opposing genocide is racist or anti-Jew. If you believe that zionism is not evil, tell us why w/o hiding behind the “racist” slander.
You rationalize and justify blatant targeting of civilians just like they do. You are the same war criminal slime that they are.
How convenient that this war coincidentally advances & contributes to the global socioeconomic & techno-Communist goals of the WEF viz higher oil prices to increase the sales of electric commie cars & Jewish-Christisn-Islamic eschatology. If you haven’t figured it out yet:
Thesis : USrael-Israel/NATO
Antithesis: Iran/BRICS
Synthesis: WEF-UN Agenda 2030/Third Temple/Messianic AgeOf course, both ‘sides’ are controlled by the same supranational Jewish central banking cartel dialectically advancing its global techno-Communist system & theopolitical aims behind contrived conflict/wars. Ordo Ab Chao.
And the zionist’s win. Great job, OffG, you’ve become what you said you aren’t
Buh bye.
Well your credibility as a real commenter just tanked. Buh bye.
You must be a zionist then. A Gaza genocide supporter.
“War, however, is no longer the desperate, annihilating struggle that it was in the early decades of the twentieth century. It is a warfare of limited aims between combatants who are unable to destroy one another, have no material cause for fighting, and are not divided by any genuine ideological difference.” George Orwell, 1984
I think there is a material cause: greed. US wants to control oil & gas thru controlling the Strait; Israel wants to steal more land. Ukraine war is to weaken Russia, defeat her & steal her resources for US & Europe.
The ultimate war of which these smaller wars are skirmishes is HIGHLY ideological. It is a war between the billionaire ideology of feudalism for the remnant permitted to survive, and an ideology of freedom and survival wanted by humanity.
These ‘combatants’ are all on the same team, following a script. Multipolarity is Communism, which is the end game for the jews.
Now that’s pretty close to the mark imo. Well said
well said. To me it seems driven equally now by the military industrial complex seeking profits, and the major blocks, the US and Western Europe, seeking secure energy sources for the decades to come so they don’t collapse under the weight of their own debt and freeze to death..
Iran War News
–Some low-level US & Israeli fighter jets attacks on speedboats South of Larak Island. Trump says not a violation of ceasefire cuz it’s self-defense; to prevent Iran targeting US ships.
Explosions in the port of Bandar Abbas, Iran’s biggest economic hub; it’s right on the Strait.
–Iran shot down & recovered an Israeli reconnaissance drone.
Apparently, US & Israel bombed the surface of subterranean areas which were known to have been evacuated a long while ago. And that was the reason for the other strikes.
RUSSIAN WAR NEWS
“Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held a telephone conversation on Monday with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio , in which he informed him that his country’s forces will carry out systematic attacks against military targets in Kiev in response to the Ukrainian regime’s terrorist attacks against civilians on Russian territory.”
–RT
Russia/Ukraine war is really heating up. Experts are saying that the fact that Russia led last night’s attack on Kiev with an Oreshnik missile is significant. The missile had no explosive warhead, just a kinetic impact. However, this missile is part of their nuclear program, so it’s a message. Too subtle for me.
Appears Russia is being subjected to the boiling frog technique, as Ukraine and elements of the EU slowly ratchet up attacks. In the past there were attacks on Russia’s nuclear deterrent. Unbelievably trust-busting.
More recently, attacks on FOUR petrochemical facilities. At least the Norsi refinery was partially disabled. Lithuania has requested that nuclear armaments be installed on her territory– absolutely foolhardy.
There’s a threat to attack Kaliningrad.
Europe seems to have gone crazy, as if their hatred of Russia will somehow protect them.
For the past 4 years they have refused to negotiate w Russia, as if it’s a virtue to refuse to speak to the Russians. They WANT to go to war against Russia. It’s breathtakingly stupid.
Russia’s announcing more strikes, advising foreigners to leave Kiev, citizenry to move away from govt & decision-making sites.
Why does OG allow these obvious “clash of civilisation” shills to post here unchecked? It’s obvious “Republic of Scotland”, “colin buchanan”, “brianboru” are either working in concert or are the same agent using dufferent IDs.
Maybe add “Penelope” to that list, though she might just be a bit dotty or dim. The way she continually veers between promoting Simon Dixon’s brand of “they’re all in it together” and ferociously claiming they’re not in it together at all is very weird.
I don’t include Big Al because I think he’s just a tired old racist who can’t get beyond blaming the “joooos” for everything and clearly thinks anyone who even suggests it might not be JUST the joooos is a Mossad agent!
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks” from Hamlet
Yeah he sound like Tony’s long lost son.
Who the fuck are you, man? There you go, you just proved it Blair. You’re running cover for the zionists. And I didn’t say Jews did I, I said zionists. There’s a difference. What do you want to do there Blair, ban anyone that doesn’t agree with you? Is that what you want?
From now on we know for sure, Blair is a zionist shill.
Here, try this, let me know what you think. Then we’ll know for sure.
Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World, by Pierre Simon – The Unz Review
And (I have another comment in pending), you actually just outed yourself by calling me a racist for my criticism of zionists. Classic but very stupid. As brian said below, you went a little too far dude. Like I said, tell me what you think of that article, that’ll be a tell.
I’m not calling you a racist for criticizing zionism, I criticize zionism all the time. I’m 100% opposed to it.
I’m calling you a racist because you seem to think all Jews are zionists and that’s your justification for hating them en masse.
You never talk about the non-Jewish zionists or the non-zionist Jews.
That’s why I call you a racist.
Well, that’s just bullshit, you’re reaching way out of line. If I talk about zionists, that obviously includes non-Jewish zionists, a zio is a zio. And just because I don’t insert the caveat every fucking time that (yes, all Jews aren’t zionists), which is obvious, certainly doesn’t mean I am a racist against all Jews. The only ones I’ve seen use the “racist” trope are the zionists actually, everyone else uses anti-semitism. You might want to rethink your shit on that. Telling a fervant anti-zionist they’re racist is treading on fucked up water, no matter how you try to paint it.
Criticize zionism all you like, I have no problem with that, but you talk about “the Jews” as a collective way too much.
Just a little while ago you went off on some woman who was responding to a “It’s the Jews doing all the bad things” comment. She asked how many Jews, all of them or just a few rich ones and you called her a fucking zionist for “trying to minimise” how many Jews were actually murderers, when all she did was ask a reasonable question.
You didn’t say to her “it’s zionists I’m attacking not Jews”, you just laid into her because you thought she wasn’t hating on Jews enough.
Hating on “the Jews” en masse is racism pure and simple and has nothing to do with being anti-zionist.
That’s why I call you a racist.
Btw, before I leave Blair, are you Jewish? Just wondering.
And one more thing (another comment is pending), you never told me what you think of the Unz Review. Do you think that blog is racist? It’s a yes or no question.
And one more, can’t help it. But you really are a shill or just a dumb shit. That “woman” gave a classic “false choice” response, i.e., presenting a situation as having only two choices You ever heard of that Blair? The old false choice, dichotomy, thing? In that case, “all of them”, or just a “few rich ones”. That’s classic propaganda, right out of the book. And making one of the choices as “a few” rich ones is also bullshit, because there are way more than a “few”. That’s why I ripped into “her”. And notice “she” didn’t respond back. You sound like a young asshole who doesn’t know shit.
In fact, you’re doing the same fucking thing.
Might be best not to feed the troll, Albert.
There’s certainly more than one troll Penelope. This blog is infested with zionist trolls. Whether the admin realizes it or not, it’s being used as controlled opposition for the zionists. Time to get out of here and spread the news. I suppose that will make many happy. All they want is an echo chamber. No different from others they criticize.
You’re right Albert; whenever a war involving Israel heats up they come out of the woodwork. What can you expect from people who see genocide as the glorious fulfillment of greater israel?
But hey, Penelope. You keep on keeping on. Fuck the online censor brigade.
Go ‘way troll.
Oh shut up Penelope, you’re either too dim or dotty to know what’s going on or you’re pretending to be. Either way it’s just an annoying background twittering at this point.
Yes, he is like a whirling Dervish spewing out slime and slander like the MSM do !
Been reading here since OffG was born, I agree with you is all I want to say. I just mostly ignore what this group say but Penelope is a pest. I imagine many of the readers who never comment also agree with you. We don’t come here to be fed mainstream propaganda in the comments.
The multipolar world requires the membership of the USA and the West and so in a sense it’s not a polar antagonism.The USA and the West definitely need the multipolar world as their own survival requires a constructive relationship with the non-West where by far the greater part of the productive capacity resides. The rest definitely want peaceful and constructive relations with the West.So where is the problem?- it should be win/win as the Chinese like to say.The problem is that th West maintains the oligarchical, elitist mindset that impelled it to imperial dominance of the entire world over in the first place. But it no longer has the capacity to maintain that dominance. Unfortunately, this leads to the pathetic and depressing situation in which we now find ourselves: defeated militarily on every front but unable to recognise defeat. This is leading to, at best, the collapse of Western society and, at worst, global nuclear war. The alternative of constructive engagement with the rest of the world remains elusive across the Western political spectrum- the absence of any anti-war movement bears testimony to this. After all, why oppose wars if they’re all theatre as so many try to make out. These fantasies are themselves a manifestation of the exceptionalist Western mentality now become a sort of imperial death wish
“so many” do not try to “make out” wars are not real. Barely anyone is talking about it. However I do think there is a growing awareness, albeit mostly unspoken, that the “wars” are not making any sense any more after the revelation of method that “covid” brought.
Beyond your attempts at cod psychology and airy dismissal, there is solid real world evidence collated in this article and elsewhere that points inexorably to the obvious conclusion that our current “wars” have become more token than actual and, no matter how many they kill, are rooted more in mutual cooperation between the ruling oligarchies of east and west than in antagonism.
The wars are as real as the pandemic. Both are murderous constructs aimed at promoting an agenda.
In the anti-lockdown movement all the talk is “it’s all theatre”- the Light newspaper is pushing the same theme on its front page. If the whole world is an oligarchy then it’s mission accomplished for the Western imperialists. In reality, it’s only the West that’s an oligarchy.Russia, China and Iran have been fighting effectively to maintain there sovereignty i.e. some form of national government. the Western oligarchies depend on being able to impose the dollar system on the rest of the world and thereby plundering them. It’s been a great gig for all of us but it’s now ending. To reconstruct we must become sovereign nations and recognise other sovereign nations as equals. But that seems to be beyond us!
Lights, Camera, Iran
The Winners and Losers of a Prepackaged War is a substack my one and only informed friend sent me a month ago. It is very relevant to this OffGuardian article. The author has found many instances of missiles from all sides hitting targets already slated for replacement. Many photos and video and working links. Seems genuine? Cheers
https://morganc000.substack.com/p/lights-camera-iran
AI at it’s finest !
Yes, quite. When John Kennedy was killed, CIA manufactured & disseminated several half-credible examples of how & by whom it was done to dilute attention from the real one.
It’s sort of like that. Those who are totally captured by that idea refuse even to LOOK at what’s really happening in the wars. I do think Simon Dixon has a more detailed understanding of the banking/financial forces that manipulate people & nations– but I can’t say that I really understand him.
Iran War News
Trump asked his entire Security Council to cancel their 3-day wkend plans and come in for emergency mtg; they’re negotiating by means of the Pakistanis. Appears he wants to share the blame for his decision. He cannot attack again cuz Iran will further damage the gulf’s oil production facilities.
He’s consulting the gulf countries and he can blame them for accepting it too. They don’t want Iran to control the Strait, but neither do they want it to be closed, nor resumption of war, so they’ll probably blink.
So looks like a relatively meaningless 1-page agreement tomorrow, followed by something more detailed– followed by negotiation on the nuclear deal in 30-60 days.
Doesn’t look like real resolution & nothing prevents future US/Israel strike on Iran, AGAIN.
I can’t even imagine that Israel will stop the killing in Gaza or Lebanon. I give Iran a lot of credit for trying to stop it, but it’s going to continue.
In international waters Israelis seized a flotilla bearing aid for Gaza. They tortured, raped, broke bones of the volunteers & kidnapped them temporarily so they cd continue the abuse. Those people arrived in Turkey in terrible shape: “Survivors reported prolonged beatings, starvation, and degrading strip searches, with reports of rape and sexual assault.”
https://thecradle.co/articles/gaza-flotilla-activists-recount-super-sadistic-torture-sexual-abuse-during-abduction-in-israel
A master class in how and why the Central, City of London, Banks operate !
Richard Werner: Every Major War Begins Under False Pretenses & the Central Banks Are Behind It.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JBSeUwniDj4y/
This was great, Brian. I wonder what anyone could have found to disagree with. They doubt the reality of wars & when you post on some of the ways that wars are manipulated into being they disagree w that too. I guess just trolls w multiple names trying to sideline us. I note they post no arguments.
The only shortcoming I saw to Richard Werner’s presentation is that he downplayed the part of the US in the rise of Mao & the support CIA gave him while he was killing so many compatriots. US financial interests had considerable to do w the rise of communism in Russia too.
Do you have a link for the support Mao received?
I’ll dig into my files & see what I can find. Off the top of my head, there’s this for general info about the degree of early US & Rothschild involvement that I just posted on this site somewhere:
https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopolitics/china-the-rothschilds-and-the-global-rise-of-communism/
Also, during the Long March while so many Chinese were being starved to death, Mao took sick & was dying. He was obviously accompanied by someone from US govt– probably CIA– who got in touch w Washington to save him. A CIA guy was dropped in w penicillin, and Mao was saved. CIA was known ever-after as “the guy who saved Mao’s life.” [This is from memory; Mao may actually have been younger, can’t recall].
No, I don’t have anything else. You know he attended Yale in China & when he showed political talent was given the editorship of the school paper. I would guess he was encouraged & mentored all the way.
I’ve always thought communism was the way to prevent the growth of both China & Russia till the West was ready to deal w them. And then it became the pretext for warring against their satellites. “Godless dictatorships” and all that. At certain points we actually helped China and Russia build missing parts of their military so they were better opponents.
I notice the evidence they usually produce, which is increasingly rare, is eg some post and paste AI construct.
A certain brand of Rum comes to mind named after a British 17/ 18 th century pirate for this particular “ evidence “ source.
How about the war in Gaza, is that fake like the Iran war? Are the zionists actually coordinating with the Palestinians to genocide themselves and with Iran so they can help their Jewish friends accomplish Greater Israel? Is that what the author is proposing?
I do not think that this author, or others who state that the wars are fake necessarily mean everything is nonexistent.
I cannot speak for this author but how I understand it is that the war of ideaology is fake. The deaths are real, the devastation is real. (although the facts around them are not necessarily what we read in the news) People/populations suffer from effects of military abuse.
But it is theatrics. It is scripted. It’s Oligarchs against the world. They might disagree with each other but they will transact if it suits their wants and needs and goals. And they own the news media that reports the “facts” of what it going on. And those facts are scripted.
I do not think this author is trying to sell me anything.
The crazy thing about Wag the Dog is that it is unbelievably believable.
There are plenty on here who are still claiming those school children were not killed. How to explain that other than they’re actually defending the perpetraitors?
That’s a thought-terminating argument. Skepticism is rational when we are dealing with propaganda – especially war propaganda.
You actually agree with that, except you only extend the skepticism one way. You are completely skeptical – and rightly so – of the Israeli propaganda about so-called atrocities committed against Jews, but you reject all skepticism of similar stories coming out of Iran. That’s not a rational position.
It’s fucking been proven and admitted by the US. Good gawd, ya, I knew you were a zionist defender as well.
And actually, considering what the zionists have done (JFK, USS Liberty, 9/11, GENOCIDE in Gaza, etc., etc.), not to mention the war crimes committed by the US, why the hell should I be skeptical that they killed 170 school children? You actually want to give those bastards any benefit of the doubt, of which there is none at this point anyway? Really? That’s rational? Shit.
All these downvotes are simply more proof this is a zionist hangout.
It seems Albert they have a touch of the Hasbaras’ !
big time.
Hannah, so you’re saying that we should regard Iran’s part in the war w skepticism? How so? I’m not just challenging you. I’m genuinely interested. Do you think they are not really trying to defend themselves, or to defend Lebanon via Hezbollah? Or something else?
Try reading the article – here’s a quote from it
See, question answered. The leaders are all in it together and don’t mind killing each other’s proles for their mutual benefit and/or enrichment. War is profit and fake war is even bigger profit because the destruction can be carefully curated
for maximum benefit and minimal inconvenience.
Like I’ve said before. Bullshit, I don’t see it and I’ve seen no direct evidence, only coincidences and conjecture. This is an old meme that is naive and omits important historical background.
There is direct evidence quoted in this article, and indeed by Morgan in her own article. You might not find it enough to convince you, but you can’t claim it doesn’t exist.
Why do you think neither Russia nor Ukraine nor Israel nor Iran make any effort to seriously disable the enemy war machine?
Why do they seem to do little beyond token attacks and so often on property already derelict or scheduled for redevelopment?
Is that just coincidence?
Why do these powers continue to cooperate in every single other sphere, promote all the same anti-human agendas?
Do you think these facts are meaningless?
Do you think the governments of Russia, Iran and China all care about their people and are involved in these wars for legitimate defensive reasons?
Why, given the fact they were all willing to use a fake pandemic to exploit and murder their own people for profit and agenda do you have a problem believing they could do the same with fake wars?
Try this on for size.
Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World, by Pierre Simon – The Unz Review
I’m sorry but how is this a refutation of anything Robber Baron said or anything Kit says? As far as I can see the theories expressed about zionism are perfectly compatible with the evidence for a supra-national control mechanism manipulating all sides, no?
And THAT is what I’ve been saying. But they won’t say it, which is peculiar at best.
I have literally said that to you and I have seen others do the same.
I’m not defending Israel, never have and never will, yet you call me and everyone else you argue with “Zionists”. That just makes you look unhinged.
Tell me what you think of that article then. And I don’t give a fuck how I “look” on this controlled op site. What do you think of the Unz Review and that article I posted specifically? Do we agree on that? Did you know Ron Unz is Jewish?
There is no contradiction in the two ideas. And probably we are all in agreement that there are financial forces which manipulate the aggressor especially. But this groundless assertion that the wars are just a play is without evidence.
Why is it so attractive to you that you continue to dogmatically insist upon it w/o evidence?
Iran has destroyed most of the US bases in the Gulf and much of Israel’s military infrastructure. The remnants NATO’s military assets are strewn across Ukraine and there is next to nothing left leaving Trump high and dry. Trump and Netanyahu have been comprehensively defeated as even neocons like Kaplan are now admitting. The Israeli military, especially Major-General Itzakh Bric, have been lamenting this fact for some time. The trouble with people who think it’s all theatre is that they then fail to study what’s happening- a major failure for people presenting themselves as journalists- ideology trumps reality!
Kaplan isn’t “admitting” anything, he’s selling a narrative. In politics that’s all you do. Things couched as “admissions” are just narratives being sold – always.
The whole way the media and political class has swung towards openly stating the US hegemony is declining points to the fact the actual empire plans to ditch the US and its extended military. The bases therefore have to go and the (always unverified) claims that Iran “destroyed” them is just a cover for that.
They want the planned changeover to seem like a “victory” for the “good” side so that people welcome the NWO as being a triumph for freedom.
The idea that NATO could have its military assets exhausted by that ridiculous non-war in Ukraine is so absurd that only cult-believers in the “clash of civilisations” with zero military knowledge could possibly believe it.
A war so vague no one can even see or record a single major engagement, so inconclusive that the alleged ‘battle lines’ remain virtually unchanged in four years – yet it’s exhausted NATO’s resources in a way the Balkans, Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam and 50 years of the Cold War failed to achieve?
And if NATO is basically destroyed, why isn’t Russia in Kiev now?
In fact why did the Russian military get to the gates of Kiev in about two weeks back in 2022 and then get orders to turn around and go home?
They could have ended things there and then, so why not?
And why did Strelkov complain that the Russian military campaign seemed to be getting sabotaged or at least underfunded from the very top?
Almost as if the whole point was an inconclusive and endless “war” for some political purpose, right?
” if NATO is basically destroyed, why isn’t Russia in Kiev now?”
American Nuclear Weapons Back in the UK after almost 20 years
American Nuclear Weapons Back in the UK after almost 20 years. What’s it about. – Aviation News
The United States and its NATO allies do not disclose exact figures for its European-deployed stockpiles.
In 2021, it is estimated that there are 100 U.S.-owned nuclear weapons stored in five NATO member states across six bases: Kleine Brogel in Belgium, Büchel Air Base in Germany, Aviano and Ghedi Air Bases in Italy, Volkel Air Base in the Netherlands, and Incirlik in Turkey.
The weapons are not armed or deployed on aircraft; they are instead kept in WS3 underground vaults in national airbases, and the Permissive Action Link (PAL) codes used to arm them remain in American hands. To be used, the bombs would be loaded onto dual-capable NATO-designated fighters.
Each country is in the process of modernizing its nuclear-capable fighters to either the F-35A, the F-18 Super Hornet, or the Eurofighter Typhoon.
Fact Sheet: U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe – Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
How is this a response to what I said?
Let me ask again – if NATO is destroyed why isn’t Russia in Kiev now?
and why did the Russian military get to the gates of Kiev in about two weeks back in 2022 and then get orders to turn around and go home?
” How is that a response..”
Hmm, so the fact the US has numerous nuclear weapons deployed against the Russian Federation, in your view, indicates they wouldn’t use them?
Seriously? Because they don’t want to take responsibility for the dump. Not again. Yes, it’s name means ‘borderland’ and it’s never been an actual nation state until the russian’s gave it that after WWII. Stop parroting all the western media. The ukraine is done, nearly all it’s men are dead and 1/3 of its land is now Russian sovereign soil.
My goodness, with such lagtime they’d better stop taunting Russia with attacks on her nuclear readiness, etc.
This sounds more Guardian than off-Gurdian.
In lock step !
You’re claiming the Guardian is championing the fake war narrative now?
The Guardian?
Are you insane?
It’s whether it’s true that’s important, not what label or association you give it.
Ask Vicky Nuland’s husband 🤣 , mighty shaken as reality Bites … and his evil ugly dumb wife led Hunters’ paths to life, after Ukraine:
A forgone conclusion. Not. 1cm . NATO. Get a grip or get Fuk’dUpBigly.
Well said, Colin. Thank you.
@Robber Baron the Dodger of Coerc-Shion: recognize first, the difference between Sunni & Shia and how B.P. sounded out their territories for Oil & Gas, with H.A.A.R.P. (likely before you were born) Fact. First Hand. .. . Then study the very Orchestrated Divisions between Arabic & Farsi ReserveS, & furthermore, sub-divide what my m8 told me, from Basra, (after 3 months absence, upon return), … – – – …
No more U. S. less, RADAR, (than ever) in Iraq ! He listened the bombings and went to look to be Sure, even headed in the quietest Moments…
Just Basra ? Logic must be applied ! Some-Body is Lying … Ai runs deeper.
I disagree that they’re token attacks which avoid disabling each other’s war machine. Nor do I find credible the idea that the destruction is limited to derelict properties. There wd be no point in the latter because such a ruse could not be kept secret forever.
Are you sure you aren’t overly enamored of the idea of “knowing” something that most other people aren’t aware of? I know it’s kind of “cool” to be the outlier but dogmatic certainty in the face of only speculation is not a real good guide to truth.
If you are indeed certain of your conclusion, look for evidence & tell us about it.
Questions answered? No, I see a lot of dogmatic assertions.
We all know that the true motives of war are dressed up to give the perpetrator’s citizens some acceptable story. And even that the perpetrator may be manipulated into starting the war, predominantly by powerful financial forces & debt. There is evidence of these things.
Perhaps there is evidence that entire conflicts are theatre– but if so, why is no one able to show that evidence? Dogmatic assertion is not evidence.
One of the flaws in the thesis of the wars are ” staged” is a long long long history of strive, bitterness and actual wars between the Zionists and their neighbours + Palestinians.
ie 1948 Arab–Israeli War
1948 Arab–Israeli War – Wikispooks
The Yom Kippur War or October War was fought by a coalition of Arab states led by Egypt and Syria (Soviet proxies) against Israel, the US client state, from 6 to 25 October 1973.
Yom Kippur War – Wikispooks
and of course the intifadas as reported by people who actually live in occupied Palestine.
The Electronic Intifada
Wars have always been fought for the same things, power/control and greed. There are always multiple agendas involved as there are now and communications between the countries involved including warnings of attacks, agreements and ground rules, etc. But to say the Iran war is being staged, that those school children weren’t really killed, and that China, Russia, Iran, Israel, US, Europe, etc., are all colluding together for the single purpose of creating the Great Reset to control the world’s population is ludicrous. The technocratic control is rolling out via capitalism and oligarchal greed, it’s happening anyway. It’s much more complicated and I’m pretty well convinced this narrative is misdirection instigated by the zionists, who do this sort of thing, to take the heat off them. I’ve seen that in many articles outside of here at this point. Unfortunately, the author and many of his sycophants here are falling for the ploy. Also, to state that “there LIKELY is death and destruction occurring”, is a clear misunderstanding of what is happening. How about the wars in Iraq, Syria and Libya, was there “likely” death and destruction” happening then? Hell, the number of refugees and deaths numbered in the millions. To play it off like that is naive as hell or done for another purpose as I’ve suggested (there’s a conspiracy theory for ya). I’m into so called conspiracy theories and certainly believe we’re being slowly strangled into submission by the technocrats, but this one is whacked.
All Wars? Wrong wrong wrong. Wars need two sides and the side being attacked is not fighting for power/control and greed is it? Go back and study the wars, most of which in the last 100 years have been started by America. Korea was like the earlier wars in the Pacific, resources and strategic bases. Vietnam the same, and Aluminium. Yes, as crazy as it sounds the US needed lots and it has very little, Vietnam had huge reserves and was there for the taking after the French pulled out. The middle east wars weren’t about power/ control and greed they were about strategic reserves of oil and strategic bases.
When goods don’t cross borders, armies do is the famous maxim and every oil was in the middle east since WWII, including the destruction of Libya, was due to the leaders of those nations going outside the US dollar system to sell oil in other currencies. The Euro mostly but also lately the Yuan. The US regards it’s currency as a “Goods” It must cross borders or it’s army will.
I didn’t say both sides are necessarily fighting for power and greed now did I. It’s like with the current war in Iran. Israel is waging the war for power and greed, along with the US, while Iran is fighting for its sovereignty and existence.
OBVIOUSLY when you speak of the cause (motive) for war you’re speaking of the aggressor.
I WISH technocracy were coming out of only capitalism and the West, but China’s “social credit score” business is rather disquieting.
Absolutely, good point. It is more than capitalism, it’s some of innate human desire to control others.
BREAKING Appears War resumption is imminent w/in hours:
–GPS jamming that affects low satellites.
–US aircraft seen over Iraq, where a formerly “secret” air platform was established by Israel before the February 28 first strike.
–Even earlier Iran closed its nighttime airspace until Monday.
–An unusual number of Iranian aircraft took off from Mehrabad airport. (possibly to park them in Pakistan where they’d be safe?)
–Trump cancelled his Maryland trip & has returned to the White House.
Penelope, you aren’t following the groupthink script the author is trying to sell. You should say, “BREAKING Appears “FAKE” war resumption is imminent”. He has proof that Iran talked to Trump and agreed that he and Nutandyahoo could throw a few more bombs their way. They are all coordinating this in a war room in Switzerland, donchaknow. And it’s all because they want us to have digital IDs.
Big Al. It’s weird that people can’t master the idea that there are VARIOUS actors who wish VARIOUS outcomes, but it’s not sensible to demonize the one you like the least and knight them with omnipotence.
You might take a look at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ure7T9Bxg
where they were covering the war news a while ago.
What nonsense are you talking, Penelope? The idea of “various actors” wishing “various outcomes” is the bog standard interpretation of geopolitics believed by 99% of people on the planet.
The idea that this commonly held belief is a sham is an extreme minority view as yet, only really arising after the covid psyop exposed unprecedented levels of cooperation heretofore considered impossible.
So take comfort from the fact most people you interact with will agree with you that people like me, Rolling Rock, Kit Knightly, Iain Davis et al are all crazy.
The Russia-China spaceship rushes towards Planet Multipolar
–Pepe Escobar
Polycentrism: “The attempts of a number of states to single-handedly manage global affairs, impose their interests on the entire world, and limit the sovereign development of other countries in the spirit of the colonial era have failed.” Russia-China will focus on establishing a “long-term state of polycentrism.”
Polycentrism = multipolarity of course. Please read on:
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2026/05/21/the-russia-china-spaceship-rushes-towards-planet-multipolar/
” these “wars” are not real, they are – to one extent or another – staged. ”
‘ ” © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation
This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of the RAND Corporation research project Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground, sponsored by the Army Quadrennial Defense Review Office, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-8, Headquarters, Department of the Army.
The purpose of the project was to examine a range of possible means to extend Russia. By this, we mean nonviolent measures that could stress Russia’s military or economy or the regime’s political standing at home and abroad.
The steps we posit would not have either defense or deterrence as their prime purpose, although they might contribute to both.
Rather, these steps are conceived of as measures that would lead Russia to compete in domains or regions where the United States has a competitive advantage, causing Russia to overextend itself militarily or economically or causing the regime to lose domestic and/or international prestige and influence. ” ‘
Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground
” War and Theft: The Takeover of Ukraine’s Agricultural Land exposes the financial interests and the dynamics at play leading to further concentration of land and finance.
The total amount of land controlled by oligarchs, corrupt individuals, and large agribusinesses is over nine million hectares — exceeding 28 percent of Ukraine’s arable land.
..The largest landholders are a mix of Ukrainian oligarchs and foreign interests — mostly European and North American as well as the sovereign fund of Saudi Arabia. Prominent US pension funds, foundations, and university endowments are invested through NCH Capital, a US-based private equity fund…
..In addition, according to the government, about five million hectares – the size of two Crimea – have been “stolen” by private interests from the state of Ukraine..
The largest landholders are a mix of oligarchs and a variety of foreign interests – mostly European and North American, including a US-based private equity fund and the sovereign fund of Saudi Arabia. All but one of the ten largest landholding firms are registered overseas, mainly in tax havens such as Cyprus or Luxembourg.
Even when run and still largely controlled by an oligarch founder, a number of firms have gone public with Western banks and investment funds now controlling a significant amount of their shares…
..The report identifies many prominent investors, including Vanguard Group, Kopernik Global Investors, BNP Asset Management Holding, Goldman Sachs-owned NN Investment Partners Holdings, and Norges Bank Investment Management, which manages Norway’s sovereign wealth fund.
A number of large US pension funds, foundations, and university endowments are also invested in Ukrainian land through NCH Capital – a US-based private equity fund, which is the fifth largest landholder in the country.
Most of these firms are substantially indebted to Western financial institutions, in particular the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the European Investment Bank (EIB), and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) – the private sector arm of the World Bank.
Together, these institutions have been major lenders to Ukrainian agribusinesses, with close to US$1.7 billion lent to just six of Ukraine’s largest landholding firms in recent years…”
War and Theft: Blackrock’s Hostile Takeover of Ukraine’s Agricultural Land – Private Equity’s 21st Century Global Enclosure for Slavery | The Land Is Ours
Meet BlackRock, the New Great Vampire Squid, by Ellen Brown – The Unz Review
The common denominator between the Rand ” think ” tank paper, along with numerous other ” research” papers from various other US/UK institutions with the hedge funds are they are controlled by the City of London/ Wall street + affiliated interests. Ie Central bankers.
When one actually reads their papers, it becomes apparent they have no intention of waging war either on the military/ economic/ social front quickly.
Indeed, they wage their campaigns in a staged manner.
Hence, for example, the title Extending Russia or the takeover of Ukraine.
I’m w you. Just because Banking-financial interests/billionaires exert pressure to affect the behavior of countries is no reason to think the war is “fake”, whatever that means.
TPTB want the natural resources of Russia. Nothing new there.
Looks like resumed war at nightfall tonight in Iran.
Thanks for giving me more reading; looks like great stuff. Ellen Brown ran for treasurer here in California. Didn’t get it of course.
Here’s a little reading for YOU, compliments of Ellen Brown, from whom I learned about Primary Water:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/california-water-wars-another-form-of-asset-stripping/5438835
Ellen Brown. Includes several innovative sources for inexpensive water. Suggestion that these are being avoided in order to enhance the value of limited water which is being bought up. It’s the people against the new “water barons” – Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Monsanto, the Bush family, and their ilk – who are buying up water all over the world at an unprecedented pace.
http://www.primarywaterinstitute.org/evidence.html
Latvia has allowed Ukraine to launch drones from its territory – a Lithuanian official has said that Nato should attack Kaliningrad – a Russian enclave – and today the Swedish PM has said that Nato – should help Ukrainian drones reach their Russian targets.
This all come on top of a wave of Ukrainian drones hitting a school dorm in a Russian area where there’s no military bases or weapons – the drones killed at least 15 people who are still unaccounted for – the drones struck the civilian area in three separate waves.
Putin has said that he will take revenge for this – things are beginning to spiral out of control.
Bullshit.
Putin is STILL exporting oil and gas to pedo nazis.
Please don’t fall for this black vs white propaganda.
Have you ever seen a world war where one side (Russia, Iran, China and many other countries) DO EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO HELP THE NAZIS?
Of course Russia is still exporting oil and gas to Europe via back channels – why wouldn’t they want it US sanctions aside, Europe has been fed on a diet of Russian oil and gas – it needs it – its machines are calibrated to Russia’s type of oil – and most importantly its good business for Russia the sales fill their coffers – it would be mad not to sell the fossils fuels to whoever wants them – fossil fuel sales help support the Russian economy – and money also goes to building and buying weapons.
Its a game of oneupmanship – we want to break you and plunder your economy – but until we can we’ll still buy your wares.
Yes, – remember when the Nazis were exporting their resources to the Allied nations all the way through ww2, because it was “good for business”?
No, no one does – because it didn’t fucking happen!
If you export oil to your enemies you’re helping them make weapons to further prosecute the war against you, which is why during real wars you don’t do that.
In fake or limited “wars” however, where the agreement is to simply keep up a show of “war” while not actually trying to win – well, you can sell all the oil you want to your “enemy” confident it won’t lead to your defeat.
nope. exchange is called win win.
btw, some commercial exchange DID take place during WWII.
The only thing that makes any sense of what we’re seeing is some form of overarching control that sits above national sovereignty and dictates policy at least in broad general terms. It’s obvious no one is trying to win these wars and that must make it a mutual pact to some degree. The wars are certainly not serving the interests of the people on either side, so who are they serving?
They call it a lot of things; power, leverage, competitive, lebensraum, productivity, maga, etc.
President Donald Trump visited China in May 2026 accompanied by a large delegation of top U.S. business leaders and administration officials.
His entourage included:
USA is making serious money.
“ It’s obvious no one is trying to win these wars..” I suggest you read , for example, the following
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR3000/RR3063/RAND_RR3063.pdf
OG’s server just went down again. DDoS? How often do they happen on average?
The Russia-China spaceship rushes towards Planet Multipolar
–Pepe Escobar
Polycentrism: “The attempts of a number of states to single-handedly manage global affairs, impose their interests on the entire world, and limit the sovereign development of other countries in the spirit of the colonial era have failed.” Russia-China will focus on establishing a “long-term state of polycentrism.”
Polycentrism = multipolarity of course. Please read on:
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2026/05/21/the-russia-china-spaceship-rushes-towards-planet-multipolar/
It’s about a strategic, joint Declaration.
here’s Penelope again, posting fake multipolar BS under an article that refutes every single point Escobar – the paid shill – makes.
You might as well quote Piers Morgan or Tucker Carlson as one of these bought and paid for multipolaristas.
Africa and Latin-America have criticised that they dont have a voice in UNSC for example.
The interactions between countries on the International level has previously been decided by a few. UK and US and before France and Spain and before Rome.
The establishment of more forums and centres like BRICS and Turkey-Pakistan-Saudi and more helps to multiply these demanded voices on the International level.
Russia and China are up comers. Growing economies who threatens the previous dominance. Is this difficult to understand?
Nicely equated, Erik : have you considered the misfortune of being named ‘Blair ‘ in any fashion, historically, then having to play a ‘gent’ provocateur , such as Eric , with a soft ‘c’ … in Welsh, ‘coffee bean 💯’
Not directed at you , Erik, (in case you manage an Audible translation…)
If People travel today, they see nothing of. Reality.
Coz’, largely disinterested in lateral thought, let alone longitudinal.
It’s NEWS: Russia & China have signed a joint Declaration.
It’s news about multipolarity, so of course I posted it here. But of course you won’t know that if you’re too close-minded to read the article.
I suppose you’re incapable of noticing that the specific characteristic of multipolar v. unipolar has NOTHING to do w most other characteristics of domestic govts.
Since you hate anyone who is in favor of multipolarism, you must be a unipolarist. You insist that multipolarism has a NECESSARY connection w unwanted characteristics, without the slightest evidence. So I guess I can conclude that your support for unipolarity means you support Israel’s genocide of her neighbors, since that’s part of the current unipolarity.
From the article ” …The leadership in Beijing has always been fully aware that blocking the Strait of Malacca is essential in the American strategy of containing and suffocating China. Power of Siberia 2 offers a solution completely outside of the thalassocratic Empire of Piracy, pumping gas directly to China from the Yamal peninsula through the Altai mountains and the Mongolia steppes…”
Along with the strategy of using other choke points across the Globe to try o ensure the City of London marionettes remain in pole position.
Yeah, it’s great that they’ve signed Siberia 2; it’ll help Russia replace the lost funds from no longer selling to Europe via Nordstream. It was so incredible that they built Nordstream 2 and never even got to turn it on before it was destroyed.
I’ve read that China is now meeting 85% of all her energy needs internally, Hard to believe. Siberia 2 won’t be operational for at least 4 years.
“Thalassocratic” hmphf– more like Empire of thuggery, especially lately.
I didn’t realize City of London was still so important till I read the Unz article on it. You don’t happen to know how deeply it’s embedded in China?
The Spider’s Web: Britain’s Second Empire | The Secret World of Finance
The City of London controlled the opium trade in China after the Communist revolution in 1949 the Chinese expelled the City of London drug dews dealers.
I was thinking of banking connex. If you search “city of London banking and China” the results are quite disquieting. One even says “celebrating 95 years of Sino-British services”
Here is a study of what the City of London did to China. After reading it carefully, ask yourself the question do you think the Chinese trust Western bankers ?
EN — LARRY ROMANOFF: Understanding China — Part 3 — Jewish Opium and British Imperialism
https://www.jpmorganchina.com.cn/en/about-us
Money conquer all disputes and misunderstandings from the past.
Jp Morgan is controlled by whom. Well, when JP himself died over 100 years ago, how much of his untold billions of dollars did he officially leave ? Answer, approximately $68,000;000. Where did the vast bulk go to ? Why the City of London who used JP as a front man. No change there I see.
Ole’ Headge Cutters , Sir Francis Chichester,
Internationale Wooly Pulis, remember the Symbol ?
You know it… the woolen TriumVibrate . . .
The right to individual privacy and freedom is one of the most fundamental problems facing humanity today.
The future depends on how we solve this problem.
It has never been encountered before.
For the first time man has come of age, a certain maturity has happened, and as you become mature you have to face new problems.
Slowly slowly, as man progressed, he became aware of many kinds of slavery, of the simple strategy of the parasitic ruling classes.
If you want to keep millions of people in slavery, let them remain unaware and as uneducated as possible.
If you really educate them they will start seeing themselves as sovereign human beings, equal to all others.
The more educated and self aware they become the more they will demand equality, freedom.
The best way to prevent that is not to educate them.
Only recently in the West have we become aware that the greatest slavery is that of the child.
It was never thought of before.
But now, as psychological insight has deepened into the human mind and its functioning’s, it has become absolutely clear that the child is the most exploited person.
Nobody has been exploited more than the child.
And of course he is being exploited behind a façade of love.
And I don’t say that the parents are aware that they are exploiting the child, that they are imposing a slavery on the child, that they are destroying the child, that they are making him stupid, unintelligent, that their whole effort of conditioning the child as an American, as British, as Israeli, then adding even more layers… as a Jew, as a Mohammedan, as a Christian, as a Buddhist, is inhuman.
They are not aware of it, but that does not make any difference as far as the facts are concerned.
Parents who belong to a certain establishment, a certain nation, a certain church, a certain denomination, are bound to force their ideas on the children.
And the strange thing is that the children are always more intelligent than the parents, because the parents belong to the past and the children belong to the future.
The parents are already conditioned, enveloped, covered.
Their mirrors are covered with so much dust that they don’t reflect anything, they are blind.
The child is being conditioned by the parents in so many ugly ways, and of course the child is helpless, he depends on the parents.
He cannot rebel, he cannot escape, he cannot protect himself.
He is absolutely vulnerable, hence he can be easily exploited.
Parental conditioning is the greatest slavery in the world. It has to be completely uprooted, only then will humanity for the first time be able to be really free, truly free, authentically free, because the child is the father of the man.
If the child is brought up in a wrong way then the whole of humanity goes wrong.
The child is the seed, if the seed itself is poisoned and corrupted by well-intentioned people, well-wishing people, then there is no hope for a free human individual, then that dream can never be fulfilled.
What you think you have is not self aware individuality, it is only unconscious personality.
It is something cultivated in you, in your nature, by your parents, the society, the priest, the politician, the educators
The educator, from the kindergarten to the university, is in the service of the vested interests, is in the service of the establishment.
His whole purpose is to destroy every child in such a way, to cripple every child in such a way, that he adjusts to the crippled established society.
There is a fear.
The fear is that if the child is left unconditioned from the very beginning he will be so intelligent, he will be so alert, aware, that his whole life style will be of rebellion.
And nobody wants rebels, everybody wants obedient people.
Each child is born with such great possibilities and potential that if he is allowed and helped to develop his individuality without any hindrance from others we will have a beautiful world, we will have a tremendous variety of geniuses.
The genius happens very rarely not because the genius is rarely born, no; the genius rarely happens because it is very difficult to escape from the conditioning process of the society.
Only once in a while does a child somehow manage to escape from its clutches.
great now summarize it
children are always more intelligent than the parents, because the parents belong to the past and the children belong to the future.
Ehh….so? You contradict yourself by this:
First you claim the innocent child is compromised and indoctrinated by its parents from birth, then you claim the child is more intelligent than its parents because of future???
Let me guess: You want all babies taken from their mother right after birth and giving to baby factories who are employing Liberals ‘especially educated in children’s need’ from social universities.
You will especially point out that parents yes are not educated to take care of their child yes?
From these children factories with research laboratories the children will be taught genius by Liberal Scientists yes? And their parents?? They work 60 hrs/week to pay off these ‘professional child care takers ‘ from Liberal universities. 😶 .
What are you talking? “Liberal scientists teaching children” is basically what we have now. Who could want that?
Instead of educating children, we should educate parents to help them be wise enough to let their children develop naturally, because to any child, their mama and papa are their most loved and most feared beings in the world and their influence is the most powerful, for good or for bad.
Do you not get tired of all the globalists deceit and fraud, the tyranny and chaos.
Have you not come to feel that this whole business of these so-called elites running the world is one big criminal conspiracy, a swindle, a racket in which only they benefit.
We need a totally different gestalt, a different social structure, a different world view, a different philosophy of life in which intelligence. is respected, in which intelligence is supported, individuality is nourished.
A blind man was standing at a bus stop, when the guy standing next to him was startled to see a dog calmly cock his leg and piss all down the blind man’s trousers.
When the blind man realized what was happening, he put his hand into his pocket and produced a bar of chocolate that he held downwards for the dog.
“That’s a very charitable thing to do,” said the man.
“Oh,” replied the blind man, “I am just finding out where his mouth is so I can kick him really hard in the balls.”
The elites always try to dominate the society.
By feeding poison to the roots of humanity.
This poisoning has gone on for so long with the result that we have forgotten it is poison.
Through their control, manipulation, war, violence and fear agendas society is degenerated.
In fact, so long as these few elites are there amongst us they will continue to dominate and create restlessness for the rest of the world.
The difference is that in the past we called them kings and emperors and now we call them presidents, prime ministers and oligarchs.
An elite group has always been there.
Forms change, but it makes no difference.
Power brings out the worst that is there in people.
Remember, power changes people.
Everybody carries that unconscious power to do evil, the seed, the will, but the opportunity is not there, it is only a potential.
When power really comes into your hands then all your hidden devils start raising their heads.
As long as human society does not evolve so that everyone attains to the same level of growth in every direction of life, there is no escape from elitism.
And I don’t think such a development is ever going to happen.
So long as the disparity in intelligence, talent and ability remains between people and societies, it is impossible to get rid of domination by the so-called chosen few.
And it is also impossible that there will not be those who want to be dominated by them: there will always be people wanting to be dominated by the elites.
Were you befooled by the Covid scam?
Did you take the toxic mRNA eugenics jab?
Do you support the US/UK terrorist states genocides, illegal war crimes and crimes against humanity around the world?
Their complete indifference to the international rule of law?
So long as people remain sleeping in the caves of their unconsciousness,
The criminal elites and retarded politicians will continue to destroy the world.
The unconscious society of elites, the state, all of your so-called religions, the mobocracy, they all want you to be stupid; nobody wants you to be intelligent.
They all condition you to remain stupid your whole life for the simple reason that stupid people are obedient.
Intelligent people start thinking on their own; they start becoming individuals.
They start having their own life, their own lifestyle, their own way of seeing, of being, of growing.
They are no more parts of the crowd, they cannot be.
They have to leave the crowd behind, only then they can grow.
And the crowd feels offended, the crowd does not want anybody to be more than the average person, it is against the average person’s ego.
The crowd, the collective has a great involvement; the involvement is that anybody becoming more intelligent, more individual, more aware, will no longer be accepted as part of the unconscious mob psychology.
This whole educational system exists to destroy intelligence or to divert you from intelligence towards storing information through memory.
Memory is useful, utilitarian.
Intelligence is alive and dangerous; it has no utility for the status quo, it has no utility for the vested interest.
Intelligent people have always proved to be difficult people just because of their intelligence; they cannot bow down to any stupid thing.
And our society is full of superstitions, stupidities; all kinds of nonsense prevails in the name of politics, in the name of religion, in the name of literature, art.
It is really a miracle how few people have escaped from this prison of mind, enlightened individuals – Gautama Buddha, Zarathustra, Lao Tzu, Jesus, Pythagoras – very few people.
It is almost impossible to escape from this prison because the prison that is society is all around you, and it starts from the very beginning, from your very childhood you are conditioned to be a prisoner of your mind.
And when you are prisoners of politics, churches, nations, races, then naturally there is going to be violence.
We have been made to function stupidly.
Our society is a vast web of hypocrisy, but we do not see it because we are born into it, just as the fish are not aware of the ocean because they are born into it.
Humanity is only too willing to be deceived, for deceit has its own logic.
Fraud and deception have their own way of advertisement, their own false logic, and they excite your desires.
Politicians persuade you in their own insidious way through division.
For ego remains only in conflict, in your struggle, of winning and losing.
Even losing is preferred for at least your ego survives.
It is better even to lose rather than be nobody, the ego at least remains.
Therefore, this inner conflict, division and suffering means you are unconsciously trying every minute to be against your nature.
You are busy trying to be what you cannot be.
It is not a question of going anywhere, just of being here-now.
Existence is just one cosmic whole, it is an organic unity.
Where all past has disappeared and the future has not yet arrived.
The way you are in this moment is the only way you can be.
In this present moment, who are you?
totally agree.
Thank you for this, Daniella. Totally agree with you, children are much more clever than adults think, but they are also vulnerable to “guidance” by elders.
There is a popular German song from 1985 called “Kinder an die Macht” (Power to the children) where among other great ideas it says children are the true anarchists.
If children would be allowed to develop freely (and I admit I have no idea how how we could make that work) then we would have a very different society.
Current “education” is not about teaching skills to children, it’s about hampering their development to make them obedient.
(Looks like my post disappeared into pending, so trying again; sorry if this shows up twice.)
Thanks for this analysis; well-written, insightful, and comprehensive, as others have said. I’m always challenged to learn more by what I read here at OG.
My own take on some points differs. For instance, I don’t see the plandemic as a one-off, boom-or-bust attempt at unification of global rule. Transnational capital has had this as a goal a helluva long time, and has been in the bizzness of creative destruction to build back better the conditions to make it so over the long haul, incrementally, whether creeping or accelerating as strategy changes. Convid was part of the strategy as a shock-and-awe coup on unprecedented scale of planetary lockdown. It was zee cut, as Klaus said, and set the stage for all that’s followed in the same direction of a death march into a prison planet.
By itself, this operation to warp-speed us into the new abnormal accomplished an alarming success in getting away with as much as it did. As I’ve come across, approximately 75% of the global population was colonized by weaponized biotech of next-generation-now eugenics and war on humanity. That alone is a chilling legacy of control and culling that continues outside spotlights to turn attention elsewhere as a multifront strategy of polycrisis and warfare – kinetic, psychological, neurological, total – carries on toward final solutions at the end of the line.
And if the best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry, you can count on the masters/monsters out to rule the world having all sorts of strategy and back-up plans to deep and hidden means to ensure evil ends. In the meantime, what revelation of the method may be provided the proles remains easily hidden in plain sight with the kind of “camouflage and conditioning” programmed language likewise provides to keep us from paying attention.
Besides bureaucratic jargon and euphemism to put us to sleep, there’s the hype to agitate feverish reactions, which is where I place end-of-empire agitprop. Reports of the demise of U$ hegemony seem greatly exaggerated as the hegemon bullies the world with its ongoing war of terror. Is this some fit of absentmindedness or senile decline as some keep claiming, after such cover story for any change of the rules-based international order seems standard since WW2, when Pax/Pox Americana was about hegemony of global capital from the get-go, to the point of letting go of ideological narratives from Bretton Woods to the present?
The current death of imperialism looks a lot like the same old racket of the empire bleeding the republic to bring the barbarians outside the gates into the nightmares of civilization, like zee Great Reset and 4IR, to refer to more recently rebranded cover story. Constantly contradictory and ever-collapsing characteristics of the US, which you could trace from its founding like any other social system of class rule by the few over the many, is an inherent feature of empire conveniently complementary to the multipolar ideology that covers for the continuing war on humanity since convid. Stay tuned, and it too will sooner or later likely recede from the spotlight as strategy unfolds.
I think the organized crime of class rule that’s been at the foundation of so-called civilization for millennia is what’s coming to some end or endgame with attempts at final solutions to the inevitable class war that history has brought. Those who appoint themselves as masters over the masses of us may be united in their class contempt for untermenschen but still divided among themselves as they run rackets of intra-class competition for resources to stay in the game, all the more as the ruling paradigm of technocracy requires more monopoly over resources of the material world, which we are tempted to forget amid all the mind control to which we are subject in the matrix.
Crime bosses are always brokering fragile deals to divvy up the spoils of class war, such that conventional war among them remains a real go-to risk to make a deal other sides can’t refuse (as some commentators, like Patrick Wood, have treated the effects of war in Iran upon US-China relations: e.g., The China Card: Global Technocracy Is Emerging Under Trump’s Reign; US And China Agree To Establish Trade And Investment Boards). What’s first of all and finally fake about war is its bizzness-as-usual fog covering for fortunes of the few as the national interest, and whatever other front these crime gangs hide behind. That masses of us keep dying for them may not (fully) define war, but it does define all too much the class war we suffer as sacrificial pawns on their grand chessboards of geopolitics. And in that respect, no war but class war defines the reality we must fight and overcome if we’re to have any life worth living.
Ok, back to mono-polarity.
Which flavour you want, the new CCP one or the old Atlantic MIC one?
Or the WEF hybrid?
It’s ALL monopolarity in that all sides and flavours are being managed by the same controllers. The idea of opposition and choice is an illusion, but apparently it’s an illusion a lot of people don’t want to escape from.
If this is the final and only choice, I would chose the Atlantic MIC.
CCP is still a Commie nation notwithstanding all progress, and WEF smell of Epstein.
Enjoy sucking Epstein’s dick then.
All right tell us who you would select of the three choices?
I’m thinking of commenting here… where do I start… ask for proof? videos, pictures… ? would I be fed idiotic pics like I recently saw about the moon landing put together by a 12 yo photoshop work including sheets of cardboard etc…
TPTB certainly is working hard these days… proof is at the pump and y’all know I’m all about “watch the petrol mofos”… and link it to the dee pop. We’ve been enjoying exponential pop growth and flying to the old countries only for 100 years, on 300k years of humanity. What do you expect? Y’all entitled now…? You want it and are sitting at your keyboards “tirant des plans sur la comète“? But I think I’ll wait and see what keeps happening since I started here 6 years ago..
YES!
YES! That was when I first realized there was something suss going on in Ukraine. And it’s happened over and over. Couldn’t be more obvious neither side are trying to win or even engaging most of the time. And yet they claim millions of dead! It doesn’t add up or make sense. Just like with covid. The only wars with that kind of lopsided profile are fake wars.
And don’t forget those weird videos that came out in 2022 showing obviously silicone bodies. They stopped doping them because they were so bollocks even the normies were seeing through them.
I had strong suspicious something like that was going on in Ukraine a couple of years ago. Now I’m sure of it. Fake wars being used as a cover for big redevelopment projects paid for by the local people through taxes and netting a bloody fortune for the contractors who will all be pals with the ones started the “wars.”
All the time.
keep your pants on will you
Good comment Redpill. The leaders of the US empire (big corporations & banks), want their war on Iran to drag on and on – in a controlled fashion – to keep weakening China, Russia and Asia in particular.
This has been planned for years in advance and is clearly set out in their 2009 policy paper “Which Path to Persia?”. Another good source of the US plans is their National Defense Strategy published in January 2026. Ignore what the many two-bit ignorant journalists of mainstream media (and some ‘alternate’) say. Go to the source – here –
National Defence Strategy 2026 USA
https://docslib.org/doc/9855681/which-path-to-persia-options-for-a-new-american-strategy-toward-iran
Wtf? Are you incapable of seeing anything beyond the illusory east-west left-right red-blue divide? The OP is talking about fake wars and all you can say in response is “yes I agree the wars are real” as if you can’t even process what the discussion is actually about!
Insane.
Eric, don’t get angry. AI is still a work in progress.
How many of the ” they are all in together” acolytes have actually read these papers which outline years in advance what their strategy and goals will be !
You need to look at what they do and listen to the propaganda straws in the wind. Four years of half-hearted “war” in Ukraine while the alleged enemies continue to send each other money and carefully avoid dealing any real strategic damage tells you more about the nature of reality here than any carefully modulated policy document released for public consumption
Corruption is built into their strategies. US is following its agenda step by step. If you care to read their policy docs you’ll understand.
Thank you MH for pointing this out. It runs a coach and horses through the thesis of ” staged ” wars against Russia or Iran !
” Four years of half-hearted “war” in Ukraine..”
‘ The second option would involve substantial increases in spending by European NATO members to improve the readiness and capabilities of their military forces. p248..
..The third option would involve the deployment of much greater numbers of either U.S. or Western European NATO member forces directly in either the Baltic States or Poland.23 NATO’s Enhanced For ward Presence initiative has already led to the rotational deployment of multinational battalions to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, but this option considers forces of much greater scale and effective combat power.24 ..P249
..Potential Benefits and Risks The potential benefits of increasing NATO land forces in Europe or increasing their effective capabilities would be threefold. First, these strategies could decrease the likelihood that Russia would contemplate a short-warning attack on a NATO member by (1) signaling Alliance resolve to fight and (2) increasing NATO capabilities to win that fight…P251 ‘
Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground
The common error many of those who are armchair ” generals ” is mistaking US/UK/NATO methods of waging war, ie shock and awe carpet bombing civilian cities, with the Russian approach of war of attrition.
By grinding down the Ukrainian military and equipment it preserves their military for the war to come against Western Europe plus to some extent the US.
Meanwhile, here is a sample of Russian results on the Ukrainian military so far.
Death Dealers: How War Turned Ukraine’s Burial System Into a Criminal Industry
The reason is known. Ptuin backed because his western equal partners (US,Israel) told him so.
The zionists love this type of shit, takes the pressure off them, which obviously is their intended purpose for trotting out the multipolar circus, the final step, they hope for their long sought new world order. Interesting so many are falling for it, but that’s what political groupthink does.
You’re off your trolley if you think the media is pushing the fake war scenario. No one is talking about that apart from a few people like Kit and Ian Davies and that Hrvje bloke (can’t spell his name) and some others.
Not even most of the so-called alternative media talk about it. It’s wall to wall war porn and “multipolarity is the cat’s bollocks” from them. I’ve been saying there’s something wrong with these so called wars since 2022 and no one was listening. You’re reversing the truth, and I don’t know why. Just look at the evidence in the article. It’s undeniable what’s going on.
That’s because nobody else fucking believes it.
So the wars before 2022 were real? Iraq v Iran, Desert Storm invasion, Afghanistan invasion, Iraq Invasion, Libya invasion, all real. But Syria,and now Iran FAKE? And of course Palestinian leaders have agreed with Israel and US leaders to crucify themselves and take one for the “team”? Please find one former member of the US or any military that had to live through any of these military actions that agrees with you.
Yeah, apparently, Hassan Nasrallah agreed to have his apartment block flattened, taking 300 other Lebanese with him in the process. And Ali Larijani agreed to be killed along with his family and 500 of his neighbours. Makes sense to me.
Naturally, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei along with many of his closest family, including his grand children, decided it was a price worth paying to have everyone murdered to remain in the ” in crowd “
Lol Albert. Apart from the fact that a Levite priest encouraged their tribal confused primal citizens to burn and kill everything cuz “they were chosen to do so”… er by God might you….er 5000 years ago (allegedly) The fact of the matter is the Demons can’t produce diarrhea (petrol) fast enough to feed the gullible (of all persuasions) to maintain the growth of the “fidèles”… So… what now?
Thanks for this analysis; well-written, insightful, and comprehensive, as others have said. I’m always challenged to learn more by what I read here at OG.
My own take on some points differs. For instance, I don’t see the plandemic as a one-off, boom-or-bust attempt at unification of global rule. Transnational capital has had this as a goal a helluva long time, and has been in the bizzness of creative destruction to build back better the conditions to make it so over the long haul, incrementally, whether creeping or accelerating as strategy changes. Convid was part of the strategy as a shock-and-awe coup on unprecedented scale of planetary lockdown. It was zee cut, as Klaus said, and set the stage for all that’s followed in the same direction of a death march into a prison planet.
By itself, this operation to warp-speed us into the new abnormal accomplished an alarming success in getting away with as much as it did. As I’ve come across, approximately 75% of the global population was colonized by weaponized biotech of next-generation-now eugenics and war on humanity. That alone is a chilling legacy of control and culling that continues outside spotlights turning attention elsewhere as a multifront strategy of polycrisis and warfare – kinetic, psychological, neurological, total – carries on toward final solutions at the end of the line.
Besides, if the best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry, you can be sure the masters/monsters out to rule the world have all sorts of strategy and back-up plans to deep and hidden means to ensure evil ends. In the meantime, what revelation of the method may be provided the proles remains easily hidden in plain sight with the kind of “camouflage and conditioning” programmed language likewise provides to keep us from paying attention.
Besides bureaucratic jargon and euphemism to put us to sleep, there’s the hype to agitate feverish reactions, which is where I place end-of-empire agitprop. Reports of the demise of U$ hegemony seem greatly exaggerated as the hegemon bullies the world with its ongoing war of terror. Is this some fit of absentmindedness or senile decline, as some keep claiming after such cover story for any change of the rules-based international order seems standard since WW2, when Pax/Pox Americana was about hegemony of global capital from the get-go, to the point of letting go of ideological narratives from Bretton Woods to the present?
The current death of imperialism looks a lot like the same old racket of the empire bleeding the republic to do what it has to do to bring the barbarians outside the gates into the nightmares of civilization, like zee Great Reset and 4IR, to refer to more recently rebranded cover story. Constantly contradictory and ever-collapsing characteristics of the US, which you could trace from its founding like any other social system of class rule by the few over the many, is an inherent feature of empire conveniently complementary to the multipolar ideology that covers for the continuing war on humanity since convid. Stay tuned, and it too will sooner or later likely recede from the spotlight as strategy unfolds.
I think the organized crime of class rule that’s been at the foundation of so-called civilization for millennia is what’s coming to some end or endgame with attempts at final solutions to the inevitable class war that history has brought. Those who appoint themselves as masters over the masses of us may be united in their class contempt for untermenschen but still divided among themselves as they run rackets of intra-class competition for resources to stay in the game, all the more as the ruling paradigm of technocracy requires more monopoly than ever of the material world, which we are tempted to forget amid all the mind control to which we are subject in the matrix.
Crime bosses are always brokering fragile deals to divvy up the spoils of class war, such that conventional war among them remains a real go-to risk to make a deal other sides can’t refuse (as some commentators, like Patrick Wood, have treated the effects of Iranian war upon US-China relations: e.g., The China Card: Global Technocracy Is Emerging Under Trump’s Reign; US And China Agree To Establish Trade And Investment Boards). What’s first of all and finally fake about war is its bizzness-as-usual fog covering for fortunes of the few as the national interest, and whatever other front these crime gangs hide behind. That masses of us keep dying for them may not (fully) define war, but it does define all too much the class war we suffer as sacrificial pawns on their grand chessboards of geopolitics. And in that respect, no war but class war defines the reality we must fight and overcome if we’re to have any life worth living.
Thanks for your comment John. I regard Patrick Wood’s work highly, and especially this latest, an alarming timeline of the 2030 agenda progress – now speeded up thanks to AI developments. This article refers to the US but the same is happening here in Australia.
It refers to the many tricks they use to steal our property and assets…..”you will own nothing and …..”
https://patrickwood.substack.com/p/an-assessment-of-the-accelerating
And thereby, no problem! Come on down!!! 🙂
Poles are diametric opposites: as exemplified by the poles of a magnet.
You can divide the one magnet into many magnets with each magnet its own singularity but still each has only two poles.
Join the divided magnets together and you have one magnet again with only two poles.
Also poles hold up tents and scaffolding and some come from Poland.
Poles as Proles of U.S. Proliferation, Clint-essentially-Eastwards , could become a Polarisierung of the Proletariat in Prussia, pal 🤣
How do wars (or “breaches of the peace”) get underway? Thorstein Veblen has an idea, thoroughly articulated in his book “An Inquiry into the Nature of Peace and the Terms of its Perpetuation” (1917). Allow me to quote a passage from the introductory chapter:
Those fans haven’t a clue what the red face actually means – or what Hanks really is.
Isaac’s Army (@ReturnOfKappy): “Tom Hanks being honored at a NY Mets game….https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/1f440.svg WTF!!!! Symbolism will be their downfall…” | nitter.poast.org
Wow. An interesting piece, until I got to the “brutal apartheid regime” in Israel. Yeah right? Muslims, Christians and Jews coexisting, and increasing in numbers. Compare it with the other countries in the region. I looked up Lebanon. Christian population — once a majority — cratered. Lately somewhat stabilized. Jews? Only a handful remains.
genocide’s not brutal? Depopulating a part of Lebanon to steal land’s not brutal?
“A global franchise for an old system of control.”
Yes.
“Numbers, times, places, rules and limitations are all agreed on beforehand.”
No.
I was with you Kit, until you came to the staged war perception. Imho, you are giving the sociopathic elite, the “leader” class, who run every country, state, city, corporation and big business, way too much credit. Self interested collusion, at times, yes. Lockstep preconceived planning and execution, no. These people are criminal, conscienceless, avaricious climbers with permanent hard-ons for authority and domination of the “other”. They meet, live and party together like any mafia, cartel or Bankser’s Club and politely advance their sociopathic empire, cooperatively, until it doesn’t, and there is battle for booty. Conflict is the essence of capitalist class cohesion. It is expressed in economic, social and military warfare which works always on multiple levels. The direct goals and objectives of treasure, the testing and refining of the new tools and tactics of warfare, flag waving hater home team support, and the terror of FAKE threats, and losing upon an exhausted and over stimulated populace.
Do the Palestinian elite agree to stage 78 years of Hell upon their home team populace? Did Iranian elites agree to have their oil nationalized for two years then decide they’d like a coup d’etat by US/UK so they could have their oil stolen, and really wanted a fascist king installed to run the country as a Western colony, but then revolted into a religious dictatorship to stage as an enemy to the West? Did Iranian elites agree to absorb half a trillion dollars in infrastructure destruction just so drones could be tested as new battlefield technology for both sides or to passify a democracyb thinking populace? Do 75 years of US coups, war provocations, sanctions and threats against Iran not make sense, to anyone over the age of 5, that only a nuclear detente will keep the US from continually threatening them?
“An endless game and permanent chaos is how they win.”
Yes.
The “staged wars” assessment makes the elite look an omnipotent hegemonic collective that can never be outwitted. They are not. They are idiots, fools, mismanaging life on Earth catastrophically. They are obsolete and incompetent and can be removed by a knowledgeable, engaged and solidarity enlightened 95% of humanity. It is up to us, not them.
Not it doesn’t. The “staging” is done so badly it’s laughable. The only reason they get away with the childish stories and unbelievable bollocks they put out is that people don’t want to question it. They are either too lazy or too stupid or have something invested in believing these fake wars are real.
They’re not real, pal. You can’t keep on ignoring all the evidence. Kit is 100% right, except I don’t even think there’s many real casualties. Minimal certainly.
Kit is speculating absolutely and needs proof, instead of circumstantial evidence, which is all he has.
So y’all think all the destroyed cities pix are AI? So all of the individuals involved, military or civilian, in the countries where these events occurred, Syria, Ukraine, Iran, Palestine, Venezuela and now Cuba, would tell you it’s all FAKE? FAKE sanctions? FAKE destruction? All agreed upon, “leader” coordinated performances?
Please… bring on your <strong>EVIDENCE</strong>. Because Russian troops were backed out of Kiev for possible
The “ they are all in it together “ followers can’t provide concrete evidence because there isn’t any. If there was, it would be produced . QED.
” Kit is 100% right, except I don’t even think there’s many real casualties. Minimal certainly.”
The Cost: Military Cemeteries Expand Throughout Ukraine, Russia
Exclusive Satellite Images Reveal the Expansion of Russian War Cemeteries Following Huge Troops Losses in Ukraine | National Security News
Death Dealers: How War Turned Ukraine’s Burial System Into a Criminal Industry
And just recently we were talking about how The Powers that Shouldn’t Be want Adolescence to be required viewing in their indoctrination camps — whoops, I mean schools. Of course it would be far better for this article to be required reading. But what are the odds that that will happen?
I guess it’s a ‘half-empty-half-full’ situation – if the wars aren’t as gruesome or as serious in the past, and there is fakery to hide that fact, maybe that’s a good thing? Surely it has to be a good thing that the United States President and the presidents of Russia and China are meeting and communicating without bloodcurdling rhetoric, and are all, in historical terms, relatively humane individuals. Yes, it could be argued that in some ways they are ‘all in it together’ but even if so, I would say there are perhaps many worse scenarios.
You should probably read 1984, because that is where this ends if they get their way. The plan is for people to be born live and die without ever knowing anything real outside their own immediate experience.
To exist imprisoned by phantasms and fake threats and fake heroics, fake tragedies and perpetual insufficiency. To spend their lives discussing fake events that never happened, cheering victories in wars that exist only on paper, and raging at the enemy’s rocket bombs that periodically drop on them – unaware the “enemy” is just another phantasm and it’s their own government dropping the bombs just to keep everyone afraid and obedient
So, whom is Kit, the author. Sounds very unaware of what is going on to me.
“Whom is” John Rosser? And what does he think is “going on”?
Rosser the tosser?
Classic post on Stolen history, (see amazingly concise attachment), which will, no doubt get the ban here.
I think we are in a phase of malaise of human energy, after all the revelations of past years everything seems like dying. I think that God being the Holy Spirit is leaving the place for its demise and implosion, that’s why the rule of antihuman moronic incarnated demons. They should be obliterated to save the remaining humanity, but that probably cannot be the case.
My grandma, whose grandma prolly remembered something from the resets (apart from 2 world war finishing reset, which she survived) said to me once: “When the world war 3 arrives, people will look for the footprints of another human in the sand, and if they notice any they will fall on their knees crying.”
I personally think, that humans are bred technocratically just to maintain current order of things, i.e. deintellectualisation and soulcrushing. I believe that we are somehow important though, and staying strong while being an unbeliever of mainstream bullshit is a way to go. God loves a Valiant soul (Sylvain the Athonite).
I attach a post from an online imageboard which helps me with the current state of things.
Attachments
The Now; an unauthorized auxiliary to The End | stolenhistory.net – Rediscovered History of the World
post 7
If you start with the premise that everything is fake, then you have more of a chance not to fall for ”the lies of the past”.
which Kit, Iain, and the rest leave out, is due to their prejudices.
You stand there claiming “wars” are not real, but you believe in the fake history they give you.
Bad spellers of the world, untie!
Just kidding. Thanks again, for yet another on-point article, Kit.
Guess that settles it then, no further discussion required.
I view multipolarity through the lens of Orwell’s ‘ Animal Farm’.
Yes, the different farmers do sometimes have real disagreements with each other, but none of them are on the side of us ‘animals’.
Sometimes the conflicts between the farmers’ might go so far, that the ‘animals’ gain some breathing space.
Off topic (or is it).
I read a comments section on an Ebola article at the Grauniad ( so that you don’t have to).
Some of them are completely bonkers – assuming they’re real people.
Indeed, well said. A few weeks ago i came on here in a covidean frothing at the mouth, lambasting you for not supporting Iran…. I apologise.
Now that we are in the calm before the next storm…. well dealing with mad petrol, butter, cheese, onions, eggs, cat food etc prices (I just read that there were 30% less petrol purchases here in South Africa during April) I can now see somewhat more clearly.
The bastards had me going there for a while.
Keep up the good work Kitt.
Thank you.